Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Cardiology Research and Practice
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 394740, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/394740
Review Article

Arterial and Venous Thrombosis in Cancer Patients

1University of Birmingham Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, Department of Medicine, City Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH, UK
2Department of Biomedical Science & Physiology, School of Applied Sciences, Research Institute in Healthcare Sciences, University of Wolverhampton, Wulfruna Street, Wolverhampton WV1 1AD, UK

Received 22 October 2010; Accepted 4 January 2011

Academic Editor: Syed Wamique Yusuf

Copyright © 2011 Andrew D. Blann and Simon Dunmore. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The most frequent ultimate cause of death is myocardial arrest. In many cases this is due to myocardial hypoxia, generally arising from failure of the coronary macro- and microcirculation to deliver enough oxygenated red cells to the cardiomyocytes. The principle reason for this is occlusive thrombosis, either by isolated circulating thrombi, or by rupture of upstream plaque. However, an additionally serious pathology causing potentially fatal stress to the heart is extra-cardiac disease, such as pulmonary hypertension. A primary cause of the latter is pulmonary embolus, considered to be a venous thromboembolism. Whilst the thrombotic scenario has for decades been the dominating paradigm in cardiovascular disease, these issues have, until recently, been infrequently considered in cancer. However, there is now a developing view that cancer is also a thrombotic disease, and notably a disease predominantly of the venous circulation, manifesting as deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Indeed, for many, a venous thromboembolism is one of the first symptoms of a developing cancer. Furthermore, many of the standard chemotherapies in cancer are prothrombotic. Accordingly, thromboprophylaxis in cancer with heparins or oral anticoagulation (such as Warfarin), especially in high risk groups (such as those who are immobile and on high dose chemotherapy), may be an important therapy. The objective of this communication is to summarise current views on the epidemiology and pathophysiology of arterial and venous thrombosis in cancer.

1. Introduction

The greater part of human mortality and morbidity (certainly in the developed world) focuses on cardiovascular disease and its risk factors, cancer, and connective tissue disease [1]. The pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease (endothelial damage leading to hypertension and thrombosis) is established [2], whilst those subjects with connective tissue disease (generally inflammatory) are also at risk of possible life-terminating atherothrombosis [3]. A relationship between cancer and thrombosis has been recognised for almost 150 years, and each year brings additional data that confirms this association [4, 5]. Furthermore, the large proportion of terminal events in neoplastic diseases are thrombotic, leading to the hypothesis that cancer is a prothrombotic disease [69]. However, such thromboses may occur in arteries and/or veins, and many authorities fail to differentiate between these two circulations, generally focusing on venous thromboembolism (VTE). Nevertheless, of PubMed citations of works on arterial and venous thrombosis, approximately 25% are to arterial thrombosis.

An additional aspect of thrombosis and cancer is the inevitably adverse effect of chemotherapy (often anti-neoplastic and cytotoxic) in promoting thrombosis [8, 9]. Although there are isolated reports where hypercoagulability and thrombosis closely follows chemotherapy [10, 11], guidelines advocating prophylactic anticoagulation therapy in the para-antineoplastic drug setting are becoming available. Indeed, one study named thromboembolism and infection as leading precise causes of death in cancer patients on chemotherapy [12].

The objective of this paper is to summarise potential pathophysiological mechanisms to explain this relationship, and to update facets of both arterial and venous thrombosis in various cancers. To achieve this aim, on-line search engines such as PubMed and Medline were probed using key words cancer, arterial thrombosis, venous thrombosis, and anticoagulation. Whilst acknowledging advances brought by tissue culture and animal models, the paper will focus on human disease.

2. The Pathophysiology of Thrombosis

Perhaps the oldest and most dominant theory of the pathophysiology of thrombosis is that of Virchow, which has three separate but overlapping parts: the contents of the blood, the blood vessel wall, and blood flow [13]. We currently interpret this triad in terms of, respectively, platelets and coagulation factors (with minor roles for red and white blood cells), the endothelium, and blood turbulence (as may be present at valves and at bifurcations) and venostasis [14]. Certainly, however, these principles are as equally applicable to arterial thromboses and to venous thromboses, and also to cancer (Table 1). Indeed, patients with various cancers frequently demonstrate abnormalities in each component of Virchow’s triad, leading to a prothrombotic or hypercoagulable state. The mechanisms are likely to be multiple and, probably, synergistic. For example, tumour cells may be directly prothrombotic, inducing thrombin generation, whilst normal host tissues may stimulate (or be stimulated to) prothrombotic activity as a secondary response to the cancer. However, dissecting the exact mechanisms is frustrated by comorbidity and treatment effects, such as bed rest, infection, surgery, and drugs. Nevertheless, Virchow’s triad also gives us the opportunity to dissect and identify different aspects of the causes of thrombosis.

tab1
Table 1: Virchow’s triad in cancer.
2.1. The Contents of the Blood: Cells

Pathologists focus on cells and on plasma molecules. The former clearly centre on the platelet, although there are potential roles (if only minor) for white blood cells and red blood cells, the latter as ADP donors [15, 16]. Examples of platelet (hyper)activity in cancer include reduced life span in myeloma, reduced sensitivity to prostacyclin in endometrial, and cervical cancer [17, 18], with increased aggregability and higher levels of platelet specific products soluble P-selectin, platelet factor 4, thrombospondin and beta-thromboglobulin in lung, breast, prostate, ovarian, and other cancers [1926]. These and other findings support the general hypothesis of altered platelet activity in cancer, especially in metastatic disease [2729]. Furthermore, it has been suggested that inappropriate platelet activity promotes metastases [30, 31].

There are several plausible theories as to the causes of this excess platelet activity. Cancer cells may activate platelets in vitro by contact, by releasing platelet stimulators such as ADP and thromboxane A2, and by generating thrombin through the activity of the tumour-associated procoagulants. Increased von Willebrand factor, ristocetin cofactor, and enhanced ADP-induced platelet aggregation have all been demonstrated [3236], and all these mechanism may promote thrombosis. However, in at least one clinical setting, the true value of this has been questioned, as Canobbio et al. [37] found that hypercoagulability was more likely to be related to coagulation than to the expected increase in platelet aggregability. Nevertheless, there are several calls for antiplatelet therapy in cancer [3840], although concerns have been aired [41].

A rapidly expanding area is that of microparticles [42, 43]. Increased numbers of platelet microparticles have been described in gastric, colon, and breast cancer [4446]. Interest in platelet microparticles follows a number of themes; in the promotion of angiogenesis and metastases [4648], in the promotion of thrombosis (such as by bearing tissue factor and phospholipids, thus providing a platform for thrombosis) [45, 49, 50], and in the promotion of invasiveness [51]. The tumour itself may also shed microparticles, and these too may be prothrombotic [5254].

Monocytes may also be involved in cancer [55]. Early work suggested a role in an immunological response to neoplasia [56, 57], and although this persists, a more recent view linking monocytes to coagulation has been introduced, based on their ability to express tissue factor [5861]. However, other mechanisms may also be important, such as the delivery of cytokines and a role in angiogenesis [62, 63] and there are also reports of the procoagulant activity of monocyte microparticles [64], and also of cross-talk between the monocyte and the platelet [65], all of which have the potential to promote thrombosis.

2.2. The Contents of the Blood: Soluble Plasma Molecules

There is also considerable evidence which implicates soluble coagulation factors in cancer-related thrombosis [66]. The normal clotting-fibrinolytic system of haemostasis involves a fine balance between the activation and inhibition of platelets, procoagulant factors, anticoagulant factors, and fibrinolytic factors [67]. This can easily be disrupted as tumour cells can, for example, activate the coagulation system directly through interactions with the clotting and fibrinolytic systems to generate thrombin [68]. The delicate balance between the coagulation and fibrinolytic systems can easily shift to induce a prothrombotic state, perhaps via an excess of procoagulant proteins such as tissue factor, fibrinogen and plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1), and/or deficiencies in other molecules, such as anti-thrombin, Proteins C and S, and tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) [67, 69]. However, perhaps the greater part of the literature in this area considers tissue factor and cancer procoagulant.

Tissue factor is primary initiator of coagulation. Forming a complex with factor VII to activate factors X and IX, it is produced by monocytes and the endothelium [59] and is functional both at the surface of the cell and as a soluble component of plasma [70, 71]. Thus in vivo expression of tissue factor, either by tumour and/or “normal” cells, and soluble tissue factor has been implicated in intratumoral and systemic activation of blood coagulation via the extrinsic pathway, as well as in tumour growth and dissemination [7275].

Cancer procoagulant is a cysteine proteinase growth factor that is a calcium-dependent, Mn2+ stimulated enzyme [76]. Unlike tissue factor, cancer procoagulant is a direct activator of factor X without the need for factor VII and is found in malignant and fetal tissue, but not in normally differentiated tissue [77]. Concerns that at least some part of cancer procoagulant activity could be accounted for by contaminating tissue factors seem to have been dispelled [78]. In the presence of factor V, cancer procoagulant may further enhance thrombin generation by up to 3-fold. Increased cancer procoagulant levels have been reported in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia, malignant melanoma, and cancers of the colon, breast, lung, and kidney, and there is in vitro evidence that it may also be involved in metastatic potential [7982]

Numerous other proteins within the coagulation cascade have been shown to be abnormally elevated, often in association with a fall in the activity of “anticoagulant” factors. For example, reduced levels of t-PA activity have been described in patients with gastrointestinal cancer [83], whilst that of PAI-1 and other inhibitory factors of the fibrinolytic pathway can be elevated [84]. Both of these factors are likely to lead to a prothrombotic or hypercoagulable state. In addition, there are decreases in other anticoagulant factors, including anti-thrombin and resistance to activated protein C. The evidence of this on-going underlying state of heightened coagulation in cancer is clear from the numerous studies looking at levels of fibrinogen and other indices of fibrin turnover including D-dimers [71, 8589]. Increased levels of the latter reflect increased clot turnover (thrombolysis) which in turn implies increased thrombotic load, as is present in actual venothromboembolic disease, and levels of D-dimers are part of the clinical assessment of subjects with suspected venothromboembolism [90]. However, there is evidence of very high D-dimer levels in patients with cancer who do not have VTE. This suggests that elevated D-dimer levels in patients with VTE and malignancy are not solely due to presence of thrombus. Knowlson et al. suggest that high D-dimer levels in malignancy are likely to reflect the biology of the underlying tumour, with higher levels observed in breast, prostate, and bowel cancers [91].

2.3. Abnormalities of Vessel Wall

The role of endothelium in mediating the prothrombotic or hypercoagulable state is well-known, and disturbances in vascular function may be assessed by changes in plasma levels of certain molecules such as von Willebrand factor (vWf), soluble thrombomodulin, and soluble E-selectin [92]. Increased vWf has long been described in cancer [93, 94], and this may not only indicate endothelial damage but also seem likely to contribute to thrombosis by promoting platelet-platelet and platelet-subendothelium adhesion, as may increased fibrinogen [9294]. Similarly, increased soluble (i.e., plasma) thrombomodulin (as in present in cancer [95]) may account for the loss of anticoagulant membrane thrombomodulin at the endothelial surface [96]. Thus changes in vWf and thrombomodulin are likely to promote coagulopathy and thus provide a paradigm for thrombosis in cancer. Increased soluble E selectin in cancer may simply be a marker of endothelial disturbance with no direct implications for hameostasis [97]

Endothelial cells may become prothrombotic under the influence of inflammatory cytokines such as tumour necrosis factor (TNF) and interleukin (IL)-1. Such cytokines suppress endothelial fibrinolytic activity, increase endothelial cell production of IL-1 and vWf, and downregulate thrombomodulin expression that diminishes the activation of the anticoagulant protein C [98]. Cytokines such as TNF and IL-1, often increased in cancer [99], also increase the endothelial expression of E selectin, platelet activating factors, and tissue factor [98, 100]. Thus hypoxia and/or cytokine-mediated endothelial cell damage or dysfunction has the potential to further contribute to hypercoagulable state. A damaged endothelium may also present less of a challenge to a metastatic tumour cell seeking to penetrate the vessel wall. Solid tumours growing outside of the blood vasculature may also increase the permeability of the microvasculature, allowing fibrinogen and other plasma-clotting proteins to leak into the extravascular space where procoagulants associated with tumour cells or with benign stromal cells can initiate clotting and subsequent fibrin deposition [100].

Several findings suggest a link between angiogenesis and thrombosis. One of the oldest provides a rationale for a role for platelet derived growth factor (PDGF), and platelet derived endothelial growth factor, possibly shed from para-neoplastic thrombus, in neovascularisation [101, 102]. Others have localised tissue factor expression in the vascular endothelium of breast cancer tissue, which strongly correlate with the initiation of angiogenesis, hence suggesting a further possible link between the prothrombotic states and angiogenesis in these patients [103, 104]. Tissue factor expression has also been shown to correlate positively with microvessel density and the expression of the angiogenic modulator, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [105]. Interestingly, VEGF induces hyperpermeability by a direct action on the endothelium [106] and (unlike basic fibroblast growth factor) promotes platelet activation and adhesion [107] although both in vitro. An additional factor is the possibility that platelet-derived VEGF and other angiogenic molecules may be important in malignancy [108110].

2.4. Abnormalities of Blood Flow

There seems to little firm in vivo data directly implicating this third aspect of Virchow’s triad in the pathogenesis of human cancer, although imaging studies of blood flow may be a useful investigation [111]. What would seem to be a likely mechanism in cardiovascular disease [112] may not be the case in neoplasia, although there are in vitro data [113]. Nevertheless, blood viscosity at both high and low rates of shear [114], and a yield stress index measured preoperatively in cancer patients, has been correlated with the incidence of post-operative DVT [115]. The possibility arises that abnormal blood vessel formation (perhaps related to cancer angiogenesis and factors promoting this) may cause flow disturbance.

3. The Effects of Therapy and Staging on the Risk of Thrombosis

Apart from what may be described as the “natural” pathophysiology, as exemplified by Virchow’s triad, many interventions to treat cancer are prothrombotic. There is ample evidence that numerous chemotherapeutic agents, including methotrexate, cisplatin and etoposide, as well as hormonal therapies used in cancer, such as medroxyprogesterone acetate and thalidomide, have all been implicated as risk factors for thromboembolism [116121]. Other interventions such as central venous catheter placements, surgery, sepsis, and venous stasis from immobility also contribute to risk of thromboembolism [122], although some of this extra risk may be due to local inflammation and/or infection [123]. Furthermore, the general principle that chemotherapy induces thrombosis extends to nonmalignant diseases such as lupus [124]. An exact position for a role of radiotherapy in promoting thrombosis is marred in many studies by combination chemotherapy. Nevertheless, there are instances where radiotherapy does indeed increase the risk of thrombosis but may also damage the endothelium, and collectively, these issues prompt the need for pro-active anticoagulant therapy in high risk groups [121, 125128].

Levels of plasma markers of thrombin and plasmin generation have been related to staging, prognosis and intervention in patients with various cancers, including those of the cervix, lung, ovary, prostate, and breast. For example, in the study by Gadducci et al. [128], levels of prothrombotic indices were significantly raised in patients with cervical cancer, and related to surgical-pathological stage and tumour size, but not to histologic type. Similarly, several studies have shown an association between activation of blood coagulation and fibrinolysis with distant metastasis, histologic type of tumour and response to chemotherapy; indeed, gross abnormalities of prothrombotic indices might even be a sign of unfavourable prognosis in certain patients [129131]. However, others failed to note any changes in preoperative or sequential measurements up to 9 months postoperatively of fibrinopeptide A, fibrin fragment B beta 15–42, fibrinogen and serum fibrin degradation products that correlated with early recurrent breast cancer, although some markers were higher in patients with oestrogen receptor positive tumours, or increased postoperatively, largely because of an increase in patients with oestrogen receptor negative tumours [132].

4. Arterial Thrombosis in Cancer

As discussed, there is considerably more data on venous thrombosis than for arterial thrombosis in cancer. Nevertheless, thrombosis in arteries has long been recognised, although the exact mechanisms, in many cases, remain obscure [133135]. However, increased levels of coagulation molecules, concurrent disease (such as endocarditis), use of growth factors, and cytotoxic chemotherapy may all precipitate thrombosis [136140]. A potential mechanism for the latter may be endothelial damage with the loss of its natural anticoagulant nature and acquisition of a procoagulant profile [141]. However, the fact that a large proportion of these studies are case reports underlines the rarity of arterial thrombosis in cancer [138141]. Ross et al. provided additional possible pathogenic mechanisms related to atherosclerosis whilst Lowe summarised common risk factors for arterial and venous thrombosis [142, 143].

5. Prophylaxis and Treatment

A detailed discussion of the prevention and treatment of thromboembolism in cancer is beyond the scope of this paper, although at least one commentator refers to treatment of arterial cancer with anticoagulants [134]. Nevertheless, primary prevention of VTE, possibly by vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) should be considered for “high-risk” cancer patients during and immediately after chemotherapy, when long-term indwelling central venous catheters are placed, during prolonged immobilization from any cause, and following surgical interventions [118, 127]. For example, in cancer patients going for general surgery without prophylaxis, the incidence of deep vein thrombosis is approximately 29% as compared to 19% of patients without cancer [144]. Thus a possible route for the prevention of VTE in high-risk cancer patients undergoing surgery or adjuvant chemotherapy may be the use of long-term low-intensity anticoagulation [145]. However, there are concerns of the safety of VKA anticoagulants in cancer as these may cause an increase in all bleeding, major bleeding, and minor bleeding compared to patients free of cancer [146]. A meta-analysis found no evidence that warrants treatment with VKAs with the aim of improving survival [147].

These and other data suggest that, for many, low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) will be the therapy of choice [155], not merely because of a reduced rate of complications such as haemorrhage [127], but also because it improves overall survival [156]. Lee et al. reported a rate of recurrent VTE of 17% in patients on VKA anticoagulants compared to 9% in those on an LMWH [157], and later noted that the use of a LMWH relative to coumarin derivatives was associated with improved survival in patients with solid tumours who did not have metastatic disease at the time of an acute VTE [158]. Indeed, a recent international guideline on the use of anticoagulants in cancer for prophylaxis and treatment is dominated by LMWHs [148] (Table 2). Although use of LMWH compared to unfractionated heparin confers a survival advantage, the precise role of LMWHs in survival in those free of VTE is unclear but demands careful prospective analysis [159]. But whatever treatment mode is adopted, its use is likely to be long-term in high risk groups [148, 149, 160].

tab2
Table 2: Potential treatments of patients with cancer.

6. Conclusion

It has been long been recognised that cancer confers a prothrombotic or hypercoagulable state, most likely through an altered balance between the coagulation and fibrinolytic systems [161]. More recently it is clear that this risk can be related to long-term prognosis and treatment [162164], and hospitalisation for a VTE is a risk factor for a second cancer [165]. Whilst most thromboses in cancer are venous, arterial thrombosis is common, possible because the two share many risk factors [140]. Indeed, patients with an unprovoked VTE are at increased risk of an arterial thrombosis [166]. Procoagulants such as tissue factor are expressed by many tumours [73, 75, 104], and although platelet turnover and activity are also increased, it is unclear whether or not platelets themselves and/or their products actively promote thrombosis [167, 168], although a high platelet count is a risk factor for chemotherapy-associated thrombosis [169]. Risk factors for VTE whilst on chemotherapy include presence of metastases, high leukocyte count and platin-based chemotherapy [170]. There is also a growing view that some cancers are more prothrombotic than others (Table 3). Although a flawed analysis, a crude summation of this table suggests that pancreatic cancer and ovarian cancer are most likely to provoke a VTE.

tab3
Table 3: Evidence that not all cancers are associated with the same risk of VTE.

Although guidelines and a consensus statement for anticoagulant treatment are available [148150, 171], further work is needed to elucidate the mechanism (s) leading to the prothrombotic state in cancer, the potential prognostic and treatment implications, and the possible value of quantifying indices of hypercoagulability in routine clinical practice. Carefully designed studies with the appropriate methodology to establish the predictive value of various abnormalities of the prothrombotic or hypercoagulable state are needed. In this respect the development of a risk factor score, which includes leukocyte count, platelet count, and levels of tissue factor, soluble P-selectin and D-dimer, points a possible way forward in identifying those at greatest risk of thrombosis, possibly due to chemotherapy, and who therefore warrant treatment [172174]. In support of this hypothesis is data showed the value of adding soluble P-selectin and D-dimer to a risk calculator [175].

References

  1. World Health Organization, “Annex Table 2: deaths by cause, sex and mortality stratum in WHO regions, estimates for 2002,” The world health report 2004—changing history, 2004, http://www.who.int/entity/whr/2004/annex/topic/en/annex_2_en.pdf.
  2. A. D. Blann, “How a damaged blood vessel wall contibutes to thrombosis and hypertension,” Pathophysiology of Haemostasis and Thrombosis, vol. 33, no. 5-6, pp. 445–448, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. J. Kaplan, “Cardiovascular disease in rheumatoid arthritis,” Current Opinion in Rheumatology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 289–297, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. Trousseau, “Phlegmasia alba dolens,” Clinique Medicale de l’Hotel Dieu de Paris, vol. 3, pp. 654–712, 1865, translated by the New Sydenham Society, London as ‘Lectures on Clinical Medicine delivered at the Hotel Dieu de Paris’, pp. 281–95, 1872. View at Google Scholar
  5. G. H. Sack Jr., J. Levin, and W. R. Bell, “Trousseau's syndrome and other manifestations of chronic disseminated coagulopathy in patients with neoplasms: clinical, pathophysiologic, and therapeutic features,” Medicine, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 1–37, 1977. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. G. Y. H. Lip, B. S. P. Chin, and A. D. Blann, “Cancer and the prothrombotic state,” Lancet Oncology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 27–34, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. Doni, G. Lippi, G. Leoncini, S. Fedi, G. Gabbrielli, and C. Piovanelli, “Hemostatic disorders in 25 patients with limited and uncomplicated thyroid and breast cancer: prophylactic and therapeutic considerations,” Chemioterapia, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 90–96, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. F. R. Rickles, M. Levine, and R. L. Edwards, “Hemostatic alterations in cancer patients,” Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, vol. 11, no. 3-4, pp. 237–248, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. P. Prandoni, “Antithrombotic strategies in patients with cancer,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 141–144, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. T. Saphner, D. C. Tormey, and R. Gray, “Venous and arterial thrombosis in patients who received adjuvant therapy for breast cancer,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 286–294, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. H. Yamamoto, S. Noguchi, K. Miyauchi et al., “Changes in hematologic parameters during treatment with medroxyprogesterone acetate for breast cancer,” Japanese Journal of Cancer Research, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 420–425, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. A. Khorana, C. W. Francis, E. Culakova, N. M. Kuderer, and G. H. Lyman, “Thromboembolism is a leading cause of death in cancer patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 632–634, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. R. Virchow, Gesammalte Abhandlungen zur Wissenschaftlichen Medtzin, Medinger Sohn, Frankfurt, Germany, 1856.
  14. A. D. Blann and G. Y. H. Lip, “Virchow's triad revisited: the importance of soluble coagulation factors, the endothelium, and platelets,” Thrombosis Research, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 321–327, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. B. Dube, M. N. Khanna, and B. J. Kulkarni, “Changes in platelets of cancer patients,” American Surgeon, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 651–655, 1974. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. F. Abrahamsen, “Platelet turnover in metastatic cancer and the effect of platelet aggregation inhibitors,” Zeitschrift fur Krebsforschung und Klinische Onkologie, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 109–111, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. E. Fritz, H. Ludwig, W. Scheithauer, and H. Sinzinger, “Shortened platelet half-life in multiple myeloma,” Blood, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 514–520, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. J. Scialla, S. F. Speckart, M. J. Haut, and D. B. Kimball, “Alterations in platelet surface sialyltransferase activity and platelet aggregation in a group of cancer patients with a high incidence of thrombosis,” Cancer Research, vol. 39, no. 6 I, pp. 2031–2035, 1979. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. D. Blann, D. Gurney, M. Wadley, D. Bareford, P. Stonelake, and G. Y. H. Lip, “Increased soluble P-selectin in patients with haematological and breast cancer: a comparison with fibrinogen, plasminogen activator inhibitor and von Willebrand factor,” Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 43–50, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. D. A. Lane, H. Ireland, S. Wolff, E. Ranasinghe, and J. Dawes, “Detection of enhanced in vivo platelet α-granule release in different patient groups—comparison of β-thromboglobulin, platelet factor 4 and thrombospondin assays,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 183–187, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  21. R. Landolfi, S. Storti, F. Sacco, D. Scribano, L. Cudillo, and G. Leone, “Platelet activation in patients with benign and malignant ovarian diseases,” Tumori, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 459–462, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  22. P. B. Panici, G. Scambia, B. Massidda, P. Chessa, A. Tarquini, and S. Mancuso, “Elevated plasma levels of beta-thromboglobulin in breast cancer,” Oncology, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 208–211, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  23. R. Jain, D. C. Tabor, and J. C. Engle, “Plasma β-thromboglobulin levels in lung cancer,” Southern Medical Journal, vol. 76, no. 11, pp. 1380–1382, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. G. Schernthaner, H. Ludwig, and K. Silberbauer, “Elevated plasma β-thromboglobulin levels in multiple myeloma and in polycythaemia vera,” Acta Haematologica, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 219–222, 1979. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. R. J. Farrell, M. J. Duffy, M. J. Moriarty, and G. J. Duffy, “Plasma concentrations of the platelet-specific β-thromboglobulin in malignant disease,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 989–991, 1980. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. H. Al-Mondhiry, A. Manni, J. Owen, and R. Gordon, “Hemostatic effects of hormonal stimulation in patients with metastatic prostate cancer,” American Journal of Hematology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 141–145, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. P. Mehta, “Potential role of platelets in the pathogenesis of tumor metastasis,” Blood, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 55–63, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. G. J. Gasic, “Role of plasma, platelets, and endothelial cells in tumor metastasis,” Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 99–114, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. E. Bastida and A. Ordinas, “Platelet contribution to the formation of metastatic foci: the role of cancer cell-induced platelet activation,” Haemostasis, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 29–36, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. D. A. Walz, “Thrombospondin as a mediator of cancer cell adhesion in metastasis,” Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, vol. 11, no. 3-4, pp. 313–324, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. K. V. Honn, D. G. Tang, and J. D. Crissman, “Platelets and cancer metastasis: a causal relationship?” Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, vol. 11, no. 3-4, pp. 325–351, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. G. Grignani and G. A. Jamieson, “Tissue factor-dependent activation of platelets by cells and microvesicles of SK-OS-10 human osteogenic sarcoma cell line,” Invasion and Metastasis, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 172–182, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. J. D. Scarlett, P. J. Thurlow, J. M. Connellan, and C. J. Louis, “Plasma-dependent and -independent mechanisms of platelet aggregation induced by human tumour cell lines,” Thrombosis Research, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 715–726, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. F. M. Pulcinelli, G. Manzari, A. Faggioni et al., “Differential platelet proaggregating activity of three Burkitt's lymphoma-derived human cell lines,” Thrombosis Research, vol. 62, no. 1-2, pp. 9–22, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. M. G. Lampugnani and N. Crawford, “Tumour-cell-induced platelet aggregation: studies with cloned metastatic and non-metastatic variants,” Invasion and Metastasis, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 311–324, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. G. Grignani and G. A. Jamieson, “Platelets in tumor metastasis: generation of adenosine diphosphate by tumor cells is specific but unrelated to metastatic potential,” Blood, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 844–849, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. L. Canobbio, T. Fassio, A. Ardizzoni et al., “Hypercoagulable state induced by cytostatic drugs in Stage II breast cancer patients,” Cancer, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 1032–1036, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  38. E. Sierko and M. Z. Wojtukiewicz, “Inhibition of platelet function: does it offer a chance of better cancer progression control?” Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 712–721, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. L. Borsig, “The role of platelet activation in tumor metastasis,” Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 1247–1255, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. B. Ho-Tin-Noé, T. Goerge, and D. D. Wagner, “Platelets: guardians of tumor vasculature,” Cancer Research, vol. 69, no. 14, pp. 5623–5626, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. V. L. Serebruany, “Aggressive chronic platelet inhibition with prasugrel and increased cancer risks: revising oral antiplatelet regimens?” Fundamental and Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 411–417, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. A. Blann, E. Shantsila, and A. Shantsila, “Microparticles and arterial disease,” Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 488–496, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. C. Amin, N. MacKman, and N. S. Key, “Microparticles and cancer,” Pathophysiology of Haemostasis and Thrombosis, vol. 36, no. 3-4, pp. 177–183, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. B. Toth, S. Liebhardt, K. Steinig et al., “Platelet-derived microparticles and coagulation activation in breast cancer patients,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 663–669, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. G. Hron, M. Kollars, H. Weber et al., “Tissue factor-positive microparticles: cellular origin and association with coagulation activation in patients with colorectal cancer,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 119–123, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. H. K. Kim, K. S. Song, Y. S. Park et al., “Elevated levels of circulating platelet microparticles, VEGF, IL-6 and RANTES in patients with gastric cancer: possible role of a metastasis predictor,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 184–191, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. D. Varon and E. Shai, “Role of platelet-derived microparticles in angiogenesis and tumor progression,” Discovery Medicine, vol. 8, no. 43, pp. 237–241, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. H. K. Kim, K. S. Song, J. H. Chung, K. R. Lee, and SE. N. Lee, “Platelet microparticles induce angiogenesis in vitro,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 376–384, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. F. Langer, B. Spath, K. Haubold et al., “Tissue factor procoagulant activity of plasma microparticles in patients with cancer-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation,” Annals of Hematology, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 451–457, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. M. E. T. Tesselaar, F. P. H. T. M. Romijn, I. K. Van Der Linden, R. M. Bertina, and S. Osanto, “Microparticle-associated tissue factor activity in cancer patients with and without thrombosis,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 1421–1423, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. O. Dashevsky, D. Varon, and A. Brill, “Platelet-derived microparticles promote invasiveness of prostate cancer cells via upregulation of MMP-2 production,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 124, no. 8, pp. 1773–1777, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. G. M. Thomas, L. Panicot-Dubois, R. Lacroix, F. Dignat-George, D. Lombardo, and C. Dubois, “Cancer cell-derived microparticles bearing P-selectin glycoprotein ligand 1 accelerate thrombus formation in vivo,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 206, no. 9, pp. 1913–1927, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. J. I. Zwicker, H. A. Liebman, D. Neuberg et al., “Tumor-derived tissue factor-bearing microparticles are associated with venous thromboembolic events in malignancy,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 15, no. 22, pp. 6830–6840, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. J. Baran, M. Baj-Krzyworzeka, K. Weglarczyk et al., “Circulating tumour-derived microvesicles in plasma of gastric cancer patients,” Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 841–850, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. B. Chomet, J. LaPorte, and E. A. McGrew, “Atypical monocytes in patients with malignant tumors,” Acta Cytologica, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 197–199, 1966. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. R. Samak, R. Edelstein, D. Bogucki, M. Samak, and L. Israël, “Testing the monocyte-macrophage system in human cancer,” Biomedicine, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 165–169, 1980. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. J. Bartholeyns, “Monocytes and macrophages in cancer immunotherapy,” Research in Immunology, vol. 144, no. 4, pp. 288–291, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. D. Morgan, R. L. Edwards, and F. R. Rickles, “Monocyte procoagulant activity as a peripheral marker of clotting activation in cancer patients,” Haemostasis, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 55–65, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. B. Østerud, “Tissue factor expression by monocytes: regulation and pathophysiological roles,” Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. S9–S14, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. B. A. Lwaleed, P. S. Bass, and A. J. Cooper, “The biology and tumour-related properties of monocyte tissue factor,” Journal of Pathology, vol. 193, no. 1, pp. 3–12, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. N. Mackman, “Role of tissue factor in hemostasis and thrombosis,” Blood Cells, Molecules, and Diseases, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 104–107, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. G. Grignani and A. Maiolo, “Cytokines and hemostasis,” Haematologica, vol. 85, no. 9, pp. 967–972, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. C. E. Lewis, M. De Palma, and L. Naldini, “Tie2-expressing monocytes and tumor angiogenesis: regulation by hypoxia and angiopoietin-2,” Cancer Research, vol. 67, no. 18, pp. 8429–8432, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. S. Kanazawa, S. Nomura, M. Kuwana, M. Muramatsu, K. Yamaguchi, and S. Fukuhara, “Monocyte-derived microparticles may be a sign of vascular complication in patients with lung cancer,” Lung Cancer, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 145–149, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. A. Amirkhosravi, M. Alexander, K. May et al., “The importance of platelets in the expression of monocyte tissue factor antigen measured by a new whole blood flow cytometric assay,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 87–95, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. F. R. Rickles, “Mechanisms of cancer-induced thrombosis,” Pathophysiology of Haemostasis and Thrombosis, vol. 35, no. 1-2, pp. P103–P110, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. R. L. Nachman and R. Silverstein, “Hypercoagulable states,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 119, no. 8, pp. 819–827, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. L. R. Zacharski, V. A. Memoli, D. L. Ornstein, S. M. Rousseau, W. Kisiel, and B. J. Kudryk, “Tumor cell procoagulant and urokinase expression in carcinoma of the ovary,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 85, no. 15, pp. 1225–1230, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. J. W. J. Van Wersch and M. K. T. Tjwa, “Coagulation/fibrinolysis balance and lung cancer,” Haemostasis, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 117–123, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. C. Milsom and J. Rak, “Tissue factor and cancer,” Pathophysiology of Haemostasis and Thrombosis, vol. 36, no. 3-4, pp. 160–176, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. A. K. Kakkar, N. DeRuvo, V. Chinswangwatanakul, S. Tebbutt, and R. C. N. Williamson, “Extrinsic-pathway activation in cancer with high factor VIIa and tissue factor,” Lancet, vol. 346, no. 8981, pp. 1004–1005, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. B. A. Lwaleed, M. Chisholm, and J. L. Francis, “The significance of measuring monocyte tissue factor activity in patients with breast and colorectal cancer,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 80, no. 1-2, pp. 279–285, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. C. Shigemori, H. Wada, K. Matsumoto, H. Shiku, S. Nakamura, and H. Suzuki, “Tissue factor expression and metastatic potential of colorectal cancer,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 894–898, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. F. R. Rickles, G. A. Hair, R. A. Zeff, E. Lee, and R. D. Bona, “Tissue factor expression in human leukocytes and tumor cells,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 391–395, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. A. K. Kakkar, N. R. Lemoine, M. F. Scully, S. Tebbutt, and R. C. N. Williamson, “Tissue factor expression correlates with histological grade in human pancreatic cancer,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 82, no. 8, pp. 1101–1104, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. W. P. Mielicki, “Biochemistry of cancer procoagulant,” Haemostasis, vol. 31, supplement 1, pp. 8–10, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. S. G. Gordon and W. P. Mielicki, “Cancer procoagulant: a factor X activator, tumor marker and growth factor from malignant tissue,” Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 73–86, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. S. Raasi, W. P. Mielicki, S. G. Gordon, and W. Korte, “Properties of proteins in cancer procoagulant preparations that are detected by anti-tissue factor antibodies,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 428, no. 2, pp. 131–135, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. M. S. Tallman and H. C. Kwaan, “Reassessing the hemostatic disorder associated with acute promyelocytic leukemia,” Blood, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 543–553, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. M. Kamocka, M. Rózalski, U. Krajewska, R. Wierzbicki, and W. P. Mielicki, “Effect of cancer procoagulant (CP) on the growth and adhesion of MCF-7 cells to vitronectin in vitro,” Cancer Letters, vol. 222, no. 1, pp. 89–94, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. M. Jozwik, S. D. Szajda, Z. Skrzydlewski, M. Jozwik, and S. Sulkowski, “The activity of cancer procoagulant in cases of uterine leiomyomas,” European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 407–410, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. M. Kaźmierczak, K. Lewandowski, M. Z. Wojtukiewicz et al., “Cancer procoagulant in patients with adenocarcinomas,” Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 543–547, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. D. De Lucia, F. De Vita, M. Orditura et al., “Hypercoagulable state in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer: evidence for an acquired resistance to activated protein C,” Tumori, vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 948–952, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. S. Nand, S. G. Fisher, R. Salgia, and R. I. Fisher, “Hemostatic abnormalities in untreated cancer: incidence and correlation with thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 1998–2003, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. D. Green, K. Maliekel, E. Sushko, R. Akhtar, and G. A. Soff, “Activated-protein-C resistance in cancer patients,” Haemostasis, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 112–118, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. A. Falanga, F. A. Ofosu, F. Delaini et al., “The hypercoagulable state in cancer patients: evidence for impaired thrombin inhibitions,” Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis, vol. 5, supplement 1, pp. S19–S23, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. A. S. Adamson, J. L. Francis, R. O. Witherow, and M. E. Snell, “Coagulopathy in the prostate cancer patient: prevalence and clinical relevance,” Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 100–104, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. C. G. Mitter and C. C. Zielinski, “Plasma levels of D-dimer: a crosslinked fibrin-degradation product in female breast cancer,” Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 259–262, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. O. Taguchi, E. C. Gabazza, H. Yasui, T. Kobayashi, M. Yoshida, and H. Kobayashi, “Prognostic significance of plasma D-dimer levels in patients with lung cancer,” Thorax, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 563–565, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. J. Kelly, A. Rudd, R. R. Lewis, and B. J. Hunt, “Plasma D-dimers in the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 162, no. 7, pp. 747–756, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. L. Knowlson, S. Bacchu, S. Paneesha, A. McManus, K. Randall, and P. Rose, “Elevated D-dimers are also a marker of underlying malignancy and increased mortality in the absence of venous thromboembolism,” Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 818–822, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  92. A. D. Blann and D. A. Taberner, “A reliable marker of endothelial cell dysfunction: does it exist?” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 244–248, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. M. Blombäck, P. O. Hedlund, and U. Säwe, “Changes in blood coagulation and fibrinolyis in patients on different treatment regimens for prostatic cancer. Predictors for cardiovascular complications?” Thrombosis Research, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 111–121, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. J. W. J. Van Wersch and M. K. T. Tjwa, “Coagulation/fibrinolysis balance and lung cancer,” Haemostasis, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 117–123, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. A. K. Lindahl, M. C. Boffa, and U. Abildgaard, “Increased plasma thrombomodulin in cancer patients,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 112–114, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. P.-L. Liu, J.-R. Tsai, C.-C. Chiu et al., “Decreased expression of thrombomodulin is correlated with tumor cell invasiveness and poor prognosis in nonsmall cell lung cancer,” Molecular Carcinogenesis, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 874–881, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  97. R. E. Banks, A. J. H. Gearing, I. K. Hemingway, D. R. Norfolk, T. J. Perren, and P. J. Selby, “Circulating intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), E-selectin and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) in human malignancies,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 122–124, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. J. S. Pober, “Cytokine-mediated activation of vascular endothelium,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 133, no. 3, pp. 426–433, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. O. Kemik, A. Sumer, A. S. Kemik et al., “The relationship among acute-phase response proteins, cytokines and hormones in cachectic patients with colon cancer,” World Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 8, article 85, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  100. H. F. Dvorak, “Thrombosis and cancer,” Human Pathology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 275–284, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. R. Ross and A. Vogel, “The platelet-derived growth factor,” Cell, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 203–210, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. M. Ohi and C. Miki, “Tissue concentration of platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor in colorectal cancer,” Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 413–418, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  103. J. Contrino, G. Hair, D. L. Kreutzer, and F. R. Rickles, “In situ detection of tissue factor in vascular endothelial cells: correlation with the malignant phenotype of human breast disease,” Nature Medicine, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 209–215, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. R. Koomägi and M. Volm, “Tissue-factor expression in human non-small-cell lung carcinoma measured by immunohistochemistry: correlation between tissue factor and angiogenesis,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 19–22, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  105. S. A. Abdulkadir, G. F. Carvalhal, Z. Kaleem et al., “Tissue factor expression and angiogenesis in human prostate carcinoma,” Human Pathology, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 443–447, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  106. S. Hippenstiel, M. Krüll, A. Ikemann, W. Risau, M. Clauss, and N. Suttorp, “VEGF induces hyperpermeability by a direct action on endothelial cells,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 274, no. 5, pp. L678–L684, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. H. M. W. Verheul, A. S. Jorna, K. Hoekman, H. J. Broxterman, M. F. B. G. Gebbink, and H. M. Pinedo, “Vascular endothelial growth factor-stimulated endothelial cells promote adhesion and activation of platelets,” Blood, vol. 96, no. 13, pp. 4216–4221, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. J. E. Peterson, D. Zurakowski, J. E. Italiano Jr. et al., “Normal ranges of angiogenesis regulatory proteins in human platelets,” American Journal of Hematology, vol. 85, no. 7, pp. 487–493, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  109. G. J. Caine, G. Y. H. Lip, and A. D. Blann, “Platelet-derived VEGF, Flt-1, angiopoietin-1 and P-selectin in breast and prostate cancer: further evidence for a role of platelets in tumour angiogenesis,” Annals of Medicine, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 273–277, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  110. T. Wiesner, S. Bugl, F. Mayer, J. T. Hartmann, and H. G. Kopp, “Differential changes in platelet VEGF, Tsp, CXCL12, and CXCL4 in patients with metastatic cancer,” Clinical and Experimental Metastasis, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 141–149, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  111. L. Pallwein, M. Mitterberger, J. Gradl et al., “Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and elastography in imaging of prostate cancer,” Current Opinion in Urology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 39–47, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  112. P. F. Davies, M. Civelek, Y. Fang, M. A. Guerraty, and A. G. Passerini, “Endothelial heterogeneity associated with regional athero-susceptibility and adaptation to disturbed blood flow in vivo,” Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 265–275, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  113. S. Jadhav and K. Konstantopoulos, “Fluid shear- and time-dependent modulation of molecular interactions between PMNs and colon carcinomas,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 283, no. 4, pp. C1133–C1143, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  114. G. F. Von Tempelhoff, L. Heilmann, G. Hommel, and K. Pollow, “Impact of rheological variables in cancer,” Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 499–513, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  115. W. V. Humphreys, A. Walker, and D. Charlesworth, “Altered viscosity and yield stress in patients with abdominal malignancy: relationship to deep vein thrombosis,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 559–561, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  116. M. N. Levine, M. Gent, J. Hirsh et al., “The thrombogenic effect of anticancer drug therapy in women with stage II breast cancer,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 318, pp. 404–407, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  117. L. T. Goodnough, H. Saito, A. Manni, P. K. Jones, and O. H. Pearson, “Increased incidence of thromboembolism in stage IV breast cancer patients treated with a five-drug chemotherapy regimen. A study of 159 patients,” Cancer, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 1264–1268, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  118. F. R. Rickles and M. N. Levine, “Venous thromboembolism in malignancy and malignancy in venous thromboembolism,” Haemostasis, vol. 28, supplement 3, pp. 43–49, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  119. M. Di Nisio, N. Ferrante, M. De Tursi et al., “Incidental venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 104, no. 5, pp. 1049–1054, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  120. N. Starling, S. Rao, D. Cunningham et al., “Thromboembolism in patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer treated with anthracycline, platinum, and fluoropyrimidine combination chemotherapy: a report from the UK National Cancer Research Institute Upper Gastrointestinal Clinical Studies Group,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 27, no. 23, pp. 3786–3793, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  121. N. Uaprasert, P. M. Voorhees, N. Mackman, and N. S. Key, “Venous thromboembolism in multiple myeloma: current perspectives in pathogenesis,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 1790–1799, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  122. X. Zhou, S. Teegala, A. Huen et al., “Incidence and risk factors of venous thromboembolic events in lymphoma,” American Journal of Medicine, vol. 123, no. 10, pp. 935–941, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  123. R. Kanz, T. Vukovich, R. Vormittag et al., “Thrombosis risk and survival in cancer patients with elevated C-reactive protein,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 57–63, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  124. G. K. Bertsias, J. E. Salmon, and D. T. Boumpas, “Therapeutic opportunities in systemic lupus erythematosus: state of the art and prospects for the new decade,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 69, no. 9, pp. 1603–1611, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  125. C. L. Dubois, C. Pappas, A. Belmans et al., “Clinical outcome of coronary stenting after thoracic radiotherapy: a case-control study,” Heart, vol. 96, no. 9, pp. 678–682, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  126. M. Byrne, J. V. Reynolds, J. S. O'Donnell et al., “Long-term activation of the pro-coagulant response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and major cancer surgery,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 73–79, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  127. E. Hiller, “Cancer and thrombosis: managing the risks and approaches to thromboprophylaxis,” Onkologie, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 474–478, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  128. A. Gadducci, U. Baicchi, R. Marrai et al., “Pretreatment plasma levels of fibrinopeptide-A (FPA), D-dimer (DD), and von Willebrand Factor (vWF) in patients with operable cervical cancer: influence of surgical-pathological stage, tumor size, histologic type, and lymph node status,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 354–358, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  129. R. Seitz, N. Rappe, M. Kraus et al., “Activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis in patients with lung cancer: relation to tumour stage and prognosis,” Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 249–254, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  130. S. S. Mirshahi, E. Pujade-Lauraine, C. Soria et al., “D-dimer and CA 125 levels in patients with ovarian cancer during antineoplastic therapy: prognostic significance for the success of anti- cancer treatment,” Cancer, vol. 69, no. 9, pp. 2289–2292, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  131. M. Nakanishi, K. Yagawa, S. Hayashi et al., “Plasma thrombosis-inducing activity in 120 patients with primary lung cancer,” Oncology, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 297–300, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  132. P. McCulloch, G. D. O. Lowe, J. T. Douglas, G. D. Murray, and W. D. George, “Haemostatic abnormalities and outcome in patients with operable breast cancer,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 950–953, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  133. G. H. Sack Jr., J. Levin, and W. R. Bell, “Trousseau's syndrome and other manifestations of chronic disseminated coagulopathy in patients with neoplasms: clinical, pathophysiologic, and therapeutic features,” Medicine, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 1–37, 1977. View at Google Scholar
  134. J. E. Naschitz, D. Yeshurun, and J. Abrahamson, “Arterial occlusive disease in occult cancer,” American Heart Journal, vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 738–745, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  135. T. Uchiyama, M. Matsumoto, and N. Kobayashi, “Studies on the pathogenesis of coagulopathy in patients with arterial thromboembolism and malignancy,” Thrombosis Research, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 955–965, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  136. T. B. Grage, P. P. Vassilopoulos, and W. W. Shingleton, “Results of a prospective randomized study of hepatic artery infusion with 5-fluorouracil versus intravenous 5-fluorouracil in patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: a central oncology group study,” Surgery, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 550–555, 1979. View at Google Scholar
  137. K. T. Barnett and M. P. Malafa, “Complications of hepatic artery infusion: a review of 4580 reported cases,” International Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 147–160, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  138. A. W. Tolcher, R. M. Giusti, J. A. O'Shaughnessy, and K. H. Cowan, “Arterial thrombosis associated with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) administration in breast cancer patients treated with dose-intensive chemotherapy: a report of two cases,” Cancer Investigation, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 188–192, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  139. K. H. Scholz, C. Herrmann, U. Tebbe, J. M. Chemnitius, U. Helmchen, and H. Kreuzer, “Myocardial infarction in young patients with Hodgkin's disease—potential pathogenic role of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and splenectomy,” Clinical Investigator, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 57–64, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  140. D. A. Minjarez, M. A. Delorit, and S. A. Davidson, “Spontaneous arterial thrombosis with an advanced ovarian malignancy,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 176–179, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  141. M. C. Bertomeu, S. Gallo, D. Lauri, M. N. Levine, F. W. Orr, and M. R. Buchanan, “Chemotherapy enhances endothelial cell reactivity to platelets,” Clinical and Experimental Metastasis, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 511–518, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  142. J. S. Ross, N. E. Stagliano, M. J. Donovan, R. E. Breitbart, and G. S. Ginsburg, “Atherosclerosis: a cancer of the blood vessels?” American Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 116, supplement, pp. S97–S107, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  143. G. D. O. Lowe, “Common risk factors for both arterial and venous thrombosis,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 140, no. 5, pp. 488–495, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  144. G. P. Clagett, F. A. Anderson, W. Geerts et al., “Prevention of venous thromboembolism,” Chest, vol. 114, no. 5, supplement, pp. 531S–560S, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  145. M. Levine, J. Hirsh, M. Gent et al., “Double-blind randomised trial of very-low-dose warfarin for prevention of thromboembolism in stage IV breast cancer,” Lancet, vol. 343, no. 8902, pp. 886–889, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  146. G. Palareti, C. Legnani, A. Lee et al., “A comparison of the safety and efficacy of oral antiocoagulation for the treatment of venous thromboembolic disease in patients with or without malignancy,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 805–810, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  147. S. M. Smorenburg, R. Vink, H. M. Otten, F. Swaneveld, and H. R. Büller, “The effects of vitamin K-antagonists on survival of patients with malignancy: a systematic analysis,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 1586–1587, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  148. G. H. Lyman, A. A. Khorana, A. Falanga et al., “American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline: recommendations for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in patients with cancer,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 25, no. 34, pp. 5490–5505, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  149. A. A. Khorana, “The NCCN clinical practice guidelines on venous thromboembolic disease: strategies for improving VTE prophylaxis in hospitalized cancer patients,” Oncologist, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 1361–1370, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  150. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), “Venous thromboembolism: reducing the risk,” Guideline 92; 17-18, http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG92.
  151. S. Iodice, S. Gandini, M. Löhr, A. B. Lowenfels, and P. Maisonneuve, “Venous thromboembolic events and organ-specific occult cancers: a review and meta-analysis,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 781–788, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  152. S. Paneesha, A. McManus, R. Arya et al., “Frequency, demographics and risk (according to tumour type or site) of cancer-associated thrombosis among patients seen at outpatient DVT clinics,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 338–343, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  153. S. Sallah, J. Y. Wan, and N. P. Nguyen, “Venous thrombosis in patients with solid tumors: determination of frequency and characteristics,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 575–579, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  154. J. W. Blom, J. P. M. Vanderschoot, M. J. Oostindiër, S. Osanto, F. J. M. Van Der Meer, and F. R. Rosendaal, “Incidence of venous thrombosis in a large cohort of 66 329 cancer patients: results of a record linkage study,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 529–535, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  155. A. Y. Y. Lee, “The role of low-molecular-weight heparins in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients,” Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 351–355, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  156. A. Lazo-Langer, G. D. Goss, J. N. Spaans, and M. A. Rodger, “The effect of low molecular weight heparin on cancer survival. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 5, pp. 729–737, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  157. A. Y. Y. Lee, M. N. Levine, R. I. Baker et al., “Low-molecular-weight heparin versus a coumarin for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 349, no. 2, pp. 146–153, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  158. A. Y.Y. Lee, F. R. Rickles, J. A. Julian et al., “Randomized comparison of low molecular weight heparin and coumarin derivatives on the survival of patients with cancer and venous thromboembolism,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 2123–2129, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  159. A. K. Kakkar, “Antithrombotic therapy and survival in cancer patients,” Best Practice and Research: Clinical Haematology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 147–151, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  160. M. N. Levine, A. Y. Lee, and A. K. Kakkar, “From Trousseau to targeted therapy: new insights and innovations in thrombosis and cancer,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 1456–1463, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  161. E. E. Sproul, “Carcinoma and venous thrombosis: the frequency of association of carcinoma in the body of tail of the pancreas with multiple venous thrombosis,” American Journal of Cancer, pp. 566–585, 1938. View at Google Scholar
  162. A. Y. Y. Lee, “Management of thrombosis in cancer: primary prevention and secondary prophylaxis,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 128, no. 3, pp. 291–302, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  163. G. Agnelli, “Venous thromboembolism and cancer: a two-way clinical association,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 117–120, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  164. H. T. Sørensen, L. Mellemkjær, J. H. Olsen, and J. A. Baron, “Prognosis of cancers associated with venous thromboembolism,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 343, no. 25, pp. 1846–1850, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  165. H. T. Sørensen, L. Pedersen, L. Mellemkjær et al., “The risk of a second cancer after hospitalisation for venous thromboembolism,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 93, no. 7, pp. 838–841, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  166. C. Becattini, M. C. Vedovati, W. Ageno, F. Dentali, and G. Agnelli, “Incidence of arterial cardiovascular events after venous thromboembolism: a systemic review and a meta-analysis,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 8, pp. 891–897, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  167. C. Ay, R. Simanek, R. Vormittag et al., “High plasma levels of soluble P-selectin are predictive of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: results from the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study (CATS),” Blood, vol. 112, no. 7, pp. 2703–2708, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  168. Y. Hara, M. Steiner, and M. G. Baldini, “Platelets as a source of growth-promoting factor(s) for tumor cells,” Cancer Research, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 1212–1216, 1980. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  169. A. A. Khorana, C. W. Francis, E. Culakova, and G. H. Lyman, “Risk factors for chemotherapy-associated venous thromboembolism in a prospective observational study,” Cancer, vol. 104, no. 12, pp. 2822–2829, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  170. M. Di Nisio, N. Ferrante, M. De Tursi et al., “Incidental venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 104, no. 5, pp. 1049–1054, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  171. A. A. Khorana, M. B. Streiff, D. Farge et al., “Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in cancer: a consensus statement of major guidelines panels and call to action,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 27, no. 29, pp. 4919–4926, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  172. G. C. Connolly and A. A. Khorana, “Emerging risk stratification approaches to cancer-associated thrombosis: risk factors, biomarkers and a risk score,” Thrombosis Research, vol. 125, supplement 2, pp. S1–S7, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  173. R. Simanek, R. Vormittag, C. Ay et al., “High platelet count associated with venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: results from the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study (CATS),” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 114–120, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  174. G. C. Connolly, A. A. Khorana, N. M. Kuderer, E. Culakova, C. W. Francis, and G. H. Lyman, “Leukocytosis, thrombosis and early mortality in cancer patients initiating chemotherapy,” Thrombosis Research, vol. 126, pp. 113–118, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  175. C. Ay, D. Dunkler, C. Marosi et al., “Prediction of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients,” Blood, vol. 116, no. 24, pp. 5377–5382, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar