Research Article

Interest Rate Liberalization and Firm Leverage in China: Effects and Channels

Table 5

Robustness analyses using difference-in-differences regression.

VariablesPanel A: DIDPanel B: PSM + DID
LevSlevLlevLevSlevLlev
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)

LPR0.00660.00250.00270.0032−0.00070.0019
(1.10)(0.43)(0.92)(0.38)(−0.08)(0.44)
Post−0.0673−0.0648−0.0039−0.0721−0.0731−0.0012
(−23.78)(−23.82)(−2.81)(−7.47)(−7.94)(−0.24)
LPR × post−0.0395−0.0339−0.0038−0.0345−0.0257−0.0063
(−4.55)(−4.12)(−0.93)(−2.72)(−2.15)(−1.04)
ControlsYesYesYesYesYesYes
Constant−0.30620.2386−0.5301−0.2307−0.1668−0.0394
(−0.95)(0.78)(−3.38)(−0.28)(−0.21)(−0.10)
Firm effectsYesYesYesYesYesYes
Year effectsYesYesYesYesYesYes
N179561795617956301530153015
Adj-R20.36650.25970.39150.37560.26410.3935
Diff (p-value)p ≤ 0.001p ≤ 0.001

Note. , , and indicate statistical significance at 1 percent, 5 percent, and 10 percent, respectively. Two alternative measures of interest rate liberalization are used in Table 5. The t-statistics are in parentheses, we calculate them on the basis of standard errors that are robust to heteroscedasticity.