Profanity as a Self-Defense Mechanism and an Outlet for Emotional Catharsis in Stress, Anxiety, and Depression

Husain, Waqar; Wasif, Samia; Fatima, Insha

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8821517

Depression Research and Treatment

On this page

Abstract Introduction Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Ethical Approval Disclosure Conflicts of Interest References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2023 | Article ID 8821517 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8821517

Profanity as a Self-Defense Mechanism and an Outlet for Emotional Catharsis in Stress, Anxiety, and Depression

Waqar Husain,¹Samia Wasif,¹and Insha Fatima¹

Academic Editor: Janusz K. Rybakowski

Received07 Feb 2023

Revised14 Apr 2023

Accepted18 Apr 2023

Published03 May 2023

Abstract

Background. Swearing is an increasing trend among men and women worldwide. Earlier studies on the positive aspects of profanity mostly relate to pain management and the release of negative emotions. The uniqueness of the current study is its analysis for a possible constructive role of profanity in stress, anxiety, and depression. Method. The current survey involved 253 conveniently selected participants from Pakistan. The study analyzed the role of profanity in connection to stress, anxiety, and depression. Profanity Scale and the Urdu version of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale were used along with a structured interview schedule. Descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, and -test were implied to obtain results. Results. The study revealed that the usage of profane language had significantly inverse correlations with stress (; ), anxiety (; ), and depression (; ). Higher profaners also revealed significantly lower levels of depression (, vs. , ; ; Cohen’s ) and stress (, vs. , ; ; Cohen’s ) as compared to lower profaners. Profanity had no significant correlations with age (; ) and education (; ). Men projected significantly higher levels of profanity as compared to women. Conclusion. The current study viewed profanity similar to the self-defense mechanisms and emphasized on its cathartic role in stress, anxiety, and depression.

1. Introduction

1.1. Self-Defense Mechanisms

Humans are programmed to seek pleasure and avoid pain [1]. They want to repeat pleasurable and emotionally satisfying situations [2]. Based on the same pleasure principle, Sigmund Freud proposed a concept of the unconscious related self-defense mechanisms which are considered as the counter forces that activate in reaction to anxiety and negative feelings [3–5]. Defense mechanisms function at four hierarchical levels, i.e., from the least to the most mature [6], and include the psychotic defenses (delusional projection, psychotic denial, and psychotic distortion), the immature defenses (acting out, autistic fantasy, dissociation, hypochondriasis, passive aggression, and projection), the intermediate defenses (displacement, intellectualization, reaction formation, and repression), and the mature defenses (altruism, anticipation, humor, sublimation, and suppression). Repression, for example, is a flight from pain [7] in which a person tends to forget the painful and traumatic experiences of life [8, 9]. In denial, a person may refuse or deny a situation to exist [10]. Projection makes a person to attribute his unwanted thoughts and feelings to another person [11]. Displacement is to redirect an impulse of aggression to a comparatively easier and less powerful target. In regression, a person exhibits an unsuitable behavior and fantasy to avoid blame from self and others [8, 12]. Sublimation is also a self-defense mechanism in which a person tries to find satisfying ways to displace the unacceptable emotions into behaviors which are constructive and socially acceptable [8]. Sublimation is considered the most mature self-defense mechanism as it enables the person to satisfy the intolerable urges through socially acceptable and satisfying ways [12–14]. Sublimation functions as a healthy, creative, socially acceptable, and useful resolution of inner conflicts between original urges and hindering forces [15]. Defense mechanisms are unconscious, beyond the knowledge of the user and appearing as odd behaviors to the observers, dynamic and reversable, adaptive and creative, and the major means of mitigating the distressing effects of both intense emotion and cognitive dissonance [6].

The concept of defense mechanisms is widely accepted [12, 16] as it is visible in everyday behavior and emotions [17] of both men and women [18]. Defense mechanisms are regarded significant in human functioning [6]. Defense mechanisms alter perception [19] unconsciously [3] without involving the cognitive mechanisms for coping [3, 20]. Defense mechanism protects a person from the threatening and harmful biological changes, severe anxiety, depression, personality disorders, losing self-esteem, feeling ashamed, falling in cognitive conflicts, accepting failures, irresponsibility, self-centeredness, maladaptive functioning, eating disorders, somatic problems, and being affected from several negative thoughts [3, 12, 16, 18, 21–41].

1.2. Emotional Catharsis

Self-defense mechanisms are primarily oriented toward emotional catharsis. Emotional catharsis means the intense expression of emotions [42], the discharge of repressed or immediate emotions to release tension [43], and releasing the hostile [44] or traumatic [45, 46] feelings from mind. Studies have established the positive effects of emotional catharsis in releasing psychological distress during the psychotherapeutic procedures or in the daily life conditions [46–49]. Achieving emotional catharsis during psychotherapy is seen as an important cause of psychotherapeutic success [46, 50–52] as it helps in building rapport with the clients which strengthens the foundations of the psychotherapeutic relationship. Studies have also established that crying [53, 54], listening to music [55, 56], engaging in martial arts [57], and aggressive activities [58] such as playing violent video games [59, 60] help individuals to cope with life stressors and negative emotions.

1.3. Profanity

Profanity refers to offensive [61] and aggressive [62, 63] taboo words [64] related to body parts, bodily functions, sex, religion [65], and language based on positive or negative emotions [61, 66] and is subject to the subjective interpretation of the receiver [67] and the context in which profane language is used [68]. Profanity can be an unfiltered and abrupt expression of emotions [69] and a planned insult of an object, place, or a person [70]. Profanity is a fundamental part of language [71] and has its own grammatical structure [72]. Sociolinguistics correlates language and society ([73]; J. [74]) and tries to find out the relationship of profane language with gender, age, ethnicity, social class, context [75], religion, and political differences [76]. Research has established the biological effects of hearing or reading profane language such as the faster heartbeat, changes in respiration, blushing, autonomic arousal, increased galvanic skin response, and loss of bowel or bladder function (A. F. [77]). People with lesser agreeableness, lesser conscientiousness, higher extraversion, higher hostility, and antisocial personality traits swear more than their counterparts [78, 79]. People with sexual anxiety and sexual repression swear less [70].

Using profane language was punishable in 15^th century (Teresa E. [65, 80]). Profane language, in the current times, has been losing its power [81] and has becoming more common [82]. Profanity is more tolerable in private gatherings as compared to formal meetings [64, 83] and within the same gender groups as compared with groups involving mixed genders [61]. The objectives of using profane language include social bonding, handling emotional and physical pain, emotional catharsis, expressing power and control, establishing dominant-submissive relationships, confronting authorities, labeling others, conveying aggression, and humiliating others [64, 66, 67, 84–90]. Profanity is also used for humor and comedy [91–93] and to stimulate sexual excitement (Teresa E. [80]). The profane words of one’s native language contain more emotional strength [94].

Profanity can be used for both constructive and destructive purposes [95]. Swearing is a natural response to release stress [82, 96], to avoid pain [97], and to avoid severe mental consequences [66, 98]. Profane words tend to express deep emotional feelings [99, 100]. Words like “shit,” “fuck,” “bullshit” can express both positive and negative feelings [101]. Complimentary profane words such as “fucking brilliant” are also considered polite under certain circumstances [102]. Profanity can lead to tighter emotional and social bonds and a harmonious environment [64, 70, 83]. It also indicates the closeness of speaker and swearer and whether they consider each other belonging to a shared intimate or social group [64, 103, 104]. The use of profanity within a group is also the symbol of acceptance, inclusiveness, and the improvement of relationships by breaking social taboos together [102]. Swearing has an established positive effect on social interactions regarding social cohesion, comfort, and familiarity [70]. A study suggested that managers should adopt a rather permissive leadership style with respect to swearing [82]. Similarly, groups of adolescents use swearing as a sign of solidarity [63]. Profanity has also been positively correlated with honesty (G. [105]).

1.4. Rationale of the Current Study

Swearing and cursing can serve as an unconscious and mature self-defense mechanism to reduce the adverse effects of daily stressors. The earlier studies have also emphasized on the similar roles of profanity in releasing stress [82] and avoiding the fear of pain [90]. The literature, however, lacked studies focusing on the reduction of stress, anxiety, and depression through profanity. The current study, therefore, identified this knowledge gap and intended to analyze the role of profanity in connection to stress, anxiety, and depression. The study perceived profanity similar to self-defense mechanisms and regarded it as an outlet for emotional catharsis.

2. Method

2.1. Participants

The study involved 253 conveniently selected adult participants from Pakistan. These include both men () and women ().

2.2. Instruments

As the mother tongue of the participants was Urdu, the instruments used in the study were also in Urdu for getting more reliable results. Profanity Scale [106] is a self-respondent scale in Urdu which intends to measure the frequency of using profane language in daily conversation. The scale comprises of 62 items and records responses through a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. The developers reported strong validity (communalities for all the items ranged between 0.58 and 0.87), and excellent reliability (; item-total and item-scale correlations were highly significant at 0.001 level) for the scale. The scale reports 12 aspects involved in profanity, i.e., happiness, aggression, sexual frustration, revenge, attention seeking, thrill seeking, emotional satisfaction, avoiding physical fights, conversational habit, dominance, emotional immaturity, and power seeking. The study also used the Urdu translated version [107] of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale [108]. The scale is based on the tripartite model of depression and anxiety [109] which focuses on both the common and uncommon features of depression and anxiety. The earlier studies have supported the usefulness of the tripartite model of depression and anxiety [110, 111] and the clinical reliability of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale [112–115]. The items of the scale are based on the prime features of depression (dysphoria, hopelessness, devaluation of life, self-deprecation, lack of interest, anhedonia, and inertia), anxiety (autonomic arousal, skeletal musculature effects, situational anxiety, and subjective experience of anxious effect), and stress (difficulty relaxing, nervous arousal, easy agitation, irritability, over-reaction, and impatience). The Urdu version is also a self-respondent scale comprising of 42 items. It uses a 4-point Likert scale to gather responses and asks the respondents to report the possible symptoms of stress, anxiety, and depression present in the last week. The developers reported strong validity (communalities for all the items ranged between 0.71 and 0.96) and excellent reliability (; item-total and item-scale correlations were highly significant at 0.001 level) for the scale. Both these scales were found excellently reliable in the current study too (Table 1). A demographic information schedule was also used to obtain data about gender, age, education, and contact details of the participants. A structured interview schedule was also used with the 30 selected interviewees to obtain their views on the connections of profanity with psychological distress. The questions of the interview reflected upon the instances where the interviewees successfully managed their distress through profanity.

2.3. Procedure

The researchers approached the participants of the study individually while visiting different hospitals, clinics, educational institutions, and public offices. The participants were informed about the purpose of the study, and their consent to participate in the study was appropriately taken. They were assured for the confidentiality of the data and were thanked for their participation. The study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of the Department of Humanities, COMSATS University Islamabad, Pakistan. All the procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments.

2.4. Analysis

The data were recorded in the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (version 23). Descriptive statistics were calculated to measure the accuracy of the data and to quantify the findings of the interviews. This involved measuring item range, skewness, and kurtosis. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was applied to measure the correlations of profanity with stress, anxiety, depression, age, and education. -test was used to measure the gender-based differences in using profane language, stress, anxiety, and depression. The probability level was 95%.

3. Results

3.1. Reliability of the Instruments

The findings revealed excellent reliability for profanity (), depression (), anxiety (), and stress () scales (Table 1).

3.2. Levels of Profanity, Depression, Anxiety, and Stress

The level of profanity among the participants was 41.88% (Table 1) as calculated through the mean score. The levels of depression (57.30%), anxiety (50.21%), and stress (59.77%) were also recorded through the mean scores of the participants (Table 1).

3.3. Correlations of Profanity with Stress, Anxiety, and Depression

The usage of profane language had significantly inverse correlations (Table 2) with stress (; ), anxiety (; ), and depression (; ), as predicted.

3.4. Correlations with Age and Education

Profanity had no significant correlations with age and education (Table 2). Stress (; ), anxiety (; ), and depression (; ) had significantly inverse correlations with age (Table 2). Stress (; ) and depression (; ) also had significantly inverse correlations with education (Table 2).

3.5. Comparisons between Lower and Higher Profaners

The inverse correlations of profanity with depression, anxiety, and stress were further tested by making two groups out of the respondents. These groups were based on the mean score on profanity (Table 1; ), i.e., lower profaners whose score on profanity was till 130 and higher profaners whose score on profanity was above 130. Higher profaners projected significantly lower levels of depression (Table 3; , vs. , ; ; Cohen’s ) and stress (Table 3; , vs. , ; ; Cohen’s ) as compared to the lower profaners. The differences between higher and lower profaners for anxiety were not statistically significant (Table 3; , vs. , ; ) but reflected a trend of reduced anxiety for higher profaners.

3.6. Differences in Men and Women

Men projected significantly higher levels of profanity as compared to women (Table 4; , vs. , ; ; Cohen’s ). Women projected significantly higher levels of stress as compared to men (Table 4; , vs. , ; ; Cohen’s ). Men and women did not project significant differences in anxiety and depression (Table 4).

4. Discussion

The uniqueness of the current study is its analysis for a possible correlation of profanity with stress, anxiety, and depression. The earlier literature lacked findings on this specific connection. The experiences of stress, anxiety, and depression are quite normal in our daily lives. However, the excessive, unrealistic, and abnormal behaviors resulting from stress, anxiety, and depression may lead us to the clinically significant levels that may require treatment. Psychological distress, simply labeled as stress, is a change in one’s emotional state caused by the psychosocial stressors in life [116]. Anxiety refers to the unrealistic and excessive worry about the future [117]. It is considered the most common complaint of the outdoor patients in hospitals [118], a chronic illness [119, 120], and is highly prevalent worldwide [121]. Anxiety is positively correlated with several other mental disorders [122] and chronic physical conditions ([123]; A. C. [124, 125]). Depression is an umbrella term used for the subcategories of depressive and bipolar disorders. Depression is a global challenge (Correction [126, 127]) and the most frequent mental disorder worldwide [128–132]. Depression may also lead to diabetes, cardiovascular disease [133], premature deaths [134], suicide [135, 136], etc. Studies also reveal that people, in many parts of the world, lack sufficient knowledge on mental health [137], still stigmatize mental disorders [138], and stay reluctant to seek professional psychological help [139]. They are more inclined toward self-made strategies to deal with psychological problems [140]. Profanity, in such an environment, can be viewed as a cultural alternative to manage stress, anxiety, and depression. Expression of negative emotions has been regarded as the main purpose of swearing [61, 62, 68, 69].

The current study has found significantly inverse correlations of profanity with stress, anxiety, and depression. The findings of the current study also revealed significantly lower levels of depression and stress among respondents who scored higher on profanity. These significant differences further established the positive effects of profanity in depression and stress. Profanity is a form of emotional expressivity which refers to the positive or negative expressions of emotions through verbal or nonverbal communication [141]. Emotional expressivity is regarded helpful for a better psychosocial wellbeing [142, 143]. Suppressing or repressing emotions, on the other hand, has been seen negatively with regard to mental health [21, 37]. Emotional suppression and repression have been positively linked up with depression [32, 34, 35], anxiety [39], personality disorders [18, 30, 40], low self-esteem [34], irresponsibility, self-centeredness [16, 26–28, 38, 41], maladaptive functioning [3], eating disorders [25], somatic problems [29], etc. Cognitive hyperactivity is an integral part of both anxiety [144] and depression [145]. Although the earlier literature is silent in reporting the specific connections of profanity with stress, anxiety, and depression, several relevant findings do support the notion that profanity may help in reducing stress, anxiety, and depression, the same way as it stays helpful in reducing physical pain [87, 90, 97, 146–151] and the effects of negative emotions [62]. Profanity has an established cathartic effect [62, 66]. It represents the intensity of the mental state of a person [72] and discharges negative emotions in a cathartic fashion [62]. Cathartic swearing has been considered to release negative emotions [104]. Cathartic swearing can be done with or without an audience [104] and is neither polite nor rude [64, 104, 152]. Some studies have projected that the use of profane language by therapists during the therapeutic session resulted in the negative evaluation of the therapists by the clients [67]. The clients perceived the therapists using profane language as dishonest, incapable, dissatisfying [153], untrustworthy (M. [154]), physically unattractive [155], disrespectful, unprofessional, and insensitive to the needs of the clients [156]. Some other studies, however, have portrayed the positive effects of using profane language during the therapeutic session ([157]; M. J. [100, 153, 156, 158–160]) such as to create an impression that the therapist is understanding and relatable to the clients [160], to oppose the prevailing culture [161], to make the conversation more effective (G. [105, 160]), and to be more convincing [67] like the public speakers who use profane language in their speeches that were found to be more effective (M. D. [162]), more persuasive and intense [93], and more trustworthy for the listeners [62]. A study required the respondents to listen to the recorded conversation between therapists and clients and found that the respondents, upon the use of profane words by clients, found the therapist involved as more expert, attractive, and more trustworthy [156].

The additional findings of the current study revealed significantly higher levels of profanity among men as compared to women. These findings are in line with the earlier literature in this regard. Women have been regarded ethically stronger than men [163]. Studies have reported higher trends of swearing among men and regarded men as angrier than women because their anger is socially more acceptable [61, 66, 164–173]. Some other studies, however, did not find any significant differences in this regard and concluded that men and women swear equally ([62]; D. I. [174–177]). A study has rather claimed differently by reporting that women swear more than men [95]. Swearing, however, has been more socially acceptable for men as compared to women [91]. The current study also analyzed the relationship of profanity with age and education and found no significant correlations in this regard.

4.1. Limitations

The study could have been more fruitful if the experimental design would also have been incorporated in addition to the traditional data collection through scales and interviews. The study would have been more accurate if the sample would have been more diversified by including the elderly and uneducated participants as well.

5. Conclusion

The current study contributed to the existing body of scientific knowledge by correlating profanity with stress, anxiety, and depression. The study viewed the positive effects of profanity similar to the role of self-defense mechanisms in releasing psychological distress. Furthering the existing studies on pain and stress management, the current study highlighted the cathartic role of profanity in stress, anxiety, and depression as well.

5.1. Suggestions for Future Researchers

Researchers are advised to further explore the positive aspects of profanity in the management of other significant mental disorders. Similar studies from diversified cultures, especially from the Eastern collectivistic cultures, are needed to establish the cathartic effects of profanity in a more scientific fashion.

Data Availability

Data associated with this paper can be presented on demand.

Ethical Approval

The ethical approval was granted by the departmental review committee at the Department of Humanities, COMSATS University Islamabad, Pakistan. All the procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Disclosure

The authors state that the current study is original.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest with the publishing journal.

References

R. R. Hoffman and P. J. Hayes, “The pleasure principle,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 86–89, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Pakaluk, Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics: An Introduction, Cambridge University Press, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site
P. Cramer, “Seven pillars of defense mechanism theory,” Social and Personality Psychology Compass, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 1963–1981, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Hovanesian, I. Isakov, and K. L. Cervellione, “Defense mechanisms and suicide risk in major depression,” Archives of Suicide Research, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 74–86, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Perry, S. M. Beck, P. Constantinides, and J. Elizabeth Foley, “Studying change in defensive functioning in psychotherapy using the defense mechanism rating scales: four hypotheses, four cases,” in Handbook of Evidence-Based Psychodynamic Psychotherapy, R. A. Levy and J. Stuart Ablon, Eds., pp. 121–153, Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. E. Vaillant, Triumphs of experience, Harvard University Press, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site
S. Boag, “Freudian repression, the common view, and pathological science,” Review of General Psychology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 74–86, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Diehl, H. Chui, E. L. Hay, M. A. Lumley, D. Grühn, and G. Labouvie-Vief, “Change in coping and defense mechanisms across adulthood: longitudinal findings in a European American sample,” Developmental Psychology, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 634–648, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Zepf, “Repression and substitutive formation: the relationship between Freud’s concepts reconsidered,” Psychoanalytic Review, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 397–420, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Bandes, “Repression and denial in criminal lawyering,” Buffalo Criminal Law Review, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 339–389, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. E. Vaillant, “Coping and defending: processes of self-environment organization,” American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 135, no. 1, p. 139, 1978.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Cramer, “Defense mechanisms: 40 years of empirical research,” Journal of Personality Assessment, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 114–122, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Cohen and E. Kim, “Sublimation (defense mechanism),” in Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences, V. Zeigler-Hill and T. K. Shackelford, Eds., pp. 5275–5278, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. D. Ghazvini, M. Khajehpour, M. Rahmani, and E. Memari, “Sublimation, as a technique for treatment,” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 5, pp. 1811–1817, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Metzger, “Adaptive defense mechanisms: function and transcendence,” Journal of Clinical Psychology, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 478–488, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Cramer, “Defense mechanisms in psychology today: further processes for adaptation,” American Psychologist, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 637–646, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Perry, “Anomalies and specific functions in the clinical identification of defense mechanisms,” Journal of Clinical Psychology, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 406–418, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Granieri, L. La Marca, G. Mannino, S. Giunta, F. Guglielmucci, and A. Schimmenti, “The relationship between defense patterns and DSM-5 maladaptive personality domains,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 8, p. 1926, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. E. Vaillant, “Theoretical hierarchy of adaptive ego mechanisms: a 30-year follow-up of 30 men selected for psychological health,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 107–118, 1971.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Bond, S. T. Gardner, J. Christian, and J. J. Sigal, “Empirical study of self-rated defense styles,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 333–338, 1983.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Akkerman, T. J. Lewin, and V. J. Carr, “Long-term changes in defense style among patients recovering from major depression,” Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, vol. 187, no. 2, pp. 80–87, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. R. Brody, S. Muderrisoglu, and O. Nakash-Eisikovits, Emotions, defenses, and gender, 2002.
R. D. Chessick, “Psychoanalytic diagnosis: understanding personality structure in the clinical process,” American Journal of Psychotherapy, vol. 49, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. H. Cooper, “Changing notions of defense within psychoanalytic theory,” Journal of Personality, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 947–964, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Coveney and M. Olver, “Defence mechanism and coping strategy use associated with self-reported eating pathology in a non-clinical sample,” Psychreg Journal of Psychology, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 19–39, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Cramer and A. Tracy, “The pathway from child personality to adult adjustment: the road is not straight,” Journal of Research in Personality, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 369–394, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. W. Davidson, M. W. MacGregor, E. A. Johnson, E. Z. Woody, and W. F. Chaplin, “The relation between defense use and adaptive behavior,” Journal of Research in Personality, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 105–129, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Hibbard, P. C. Y. Tang, R. Latko et al., “Differential validity of the defense mechanism manual for the TAT between Asian Americans and whites,” Journal of Personality Assessment, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 351–372, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. N. Hyphantis, T. C. Taunay, D. S. Macedo et al., “Affective temperaments and ego defense mechanisms associated with somatic symptom severity in a large sample,” Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 150, no. 2, pp. 481–489, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. G. Johnson, R. F. Bornstein, and A. B. Krukonis, “Defense styles as predictors of personality disorder symptomatology,” Journal of Personality Disorders, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 408–416, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. F. Kernberg, “Unconscious conflict in the light of contemporary psychoanalytic findings,” Psychoanalytic Quarterly, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 65–81, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. G. Kneepkens and L. D. Oakley, “Rapid improvement in the defense style of depressed women and men,” Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, vol. 184, no. 6, pp. 358–361, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Kohut, The Restoration of the Self, International Universities Press, New York, 1977.
A. McNIchols, Low self-esteem, gender, and defense mechanisms among depressive disorders, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Adler School of Professional Psychology, 2014, https://search.proquest.com/docview/1646476383?accountid=15299%0Ahttp://resolver.ebscohost.com/openurl?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Psychology+Database&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&rft.genre=dissertations.
G. G. Noam and C. J. Recklitis, “The relationship between defenses and symptoms in adolescent psychopathology,” Journal of Personality Assessment, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 311–327, 1990.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Ozoh, “Use of psychological defense mechanism in academic activities among student teacher in Nigerian education system,” Knowledge Review, vol. 32, no. 1, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Pollock and G. Andrews, “Defense styles associated with specific anxiety disorders,” American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 146, no. 11, pp. 1500–1502, 1989.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. E. Romans, J. L. Martin, E. Morris, and G. Peter Herbison, “Psychological defense styles in women who report childhood sexual abuse: a controlled community study,” American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 156, no. 7, pp. 1080–1085, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Spinhoven and C. G. Kooiman, “Defense style in depressed and anxious psychiatric outpatients: an explorative study,” Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, vol. 185, no. 2, pp. 87–94, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. E. Vaillant, “Ego mechanisms of defense and personality psychopathology,” Journal of Abnormal Psychology, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 44–50, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. T. Whitty, “Coping and defending: age differences in maturity of defence mechanisms and coping strategies,” Aging and Mental Health, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 123–132, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Steckley, “Catharsis, containment and physical restraint in residential child care,” British Journal of Social Work, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1645–1663, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. J. Scheff, “Catharsis and other heresies: a theory of emotion,” Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 98–113, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. J. Bushman, R. F. Baumeister, and C. M. Phillips, “Do people aggress to improve their mood? Catharsis beliefs, affect regulation opportunity, and aggressive responding,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 17–32, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Husain, “The psychosocial variations in grieving parental and spousal death,” Journal of Loss and Trauma, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 99–104, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Scharfetter, Athena awakening: a theoretical exploration of cathartic integration within psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy for post-traumatic stress disorder, vol. 78, California Institute of Integral Studies, 2018, http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=psyc14&NEWS=N&AN=2017-33540-034.
A. Klopstech, “Catharsis and self-regulation revisited: scientific and clinical considerations,” Bioenergetic Analysis, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 101–131, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. P. Nichols and J. S. Efran, “Catharsis in psychotherapy: a new perspective,” Psychotherapy, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 46–58, 1985.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. D. Volkan, “Re-Grief Therapy,” Bereavement: Its Psychosocial Aspects, pp. 334–350, 1975.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Bemak, “Role of catharsis in group psychotherapy,” International Journal of Action Methods, vol. 50, no. 4, p. 166, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
F. X. Kosmicki and C. Glickauf-Hughes, “Catharsis in psychotherapy,” Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 154–159, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. M. Symonds, “A comprehensive theory of psychotherapy,” American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 697–714, 1954.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. M. Bylsma, A. J. J. M. Vingerhoets, and J. Rottenberg, “When is crying cathartic? An international study,” Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 1165–1187, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. J. Gross, B. L. Fredrickson, and R. W. Levenson, “The psychophysiology of crying,” Psychophysiology, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 460–468, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Arnett, “Heavy metal music and reckless behavior among adolescents,” Journal of Youth and Adolescence, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 573–592, 1991.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. D. Walworth, “The effect of preferred music genre selection versus preferred song selection on experimentally induced anxiety levels,” Journal of Music Therapy, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 2–14, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. C. Bing and S. J. Kim, “A phenomenological study of mental health enhancement in taekwondo training: application of catharsis theory,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 18, no. 8, p. 4082, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. J. Bushman, R. F. Baumeister, and A. D. Stack, “Catharsis, aggression, and persuasive influence: self-fulfilling or self-defeating prophecies?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 367–376, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. J. Lee, H. S. Kim, and S. Choi, “Violent video games and aggression: stimulation or catharsis or both?” Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 41–47, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. G. Snodgrass, M. G. Lacy, F. Dengah, S. Eisenhauer, G. Batchelder, and R. J. Cookson, “A vacation from your mind: problematic online gaming is a stress response,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 38, pp. 248–260, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Timothy and K. Janschewitz, “The pragmatics of swearing,” Journal of Politeness Research, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 267–288, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Rassin and P. Muris, “Why do women swear? An exploration of reasons for and perceived efficacy of swearing in Dutch female students,” Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 1669–1674, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Stapleton, “Gender and swearing: a community practice,” Women and Language, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 22–33, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
A. J. J. M. Vingerhoets, L. M. Bylsma, and C. de Vlam, “Swearing: a biopsychosocial perspective,” Psihologijske Teme, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 287–304, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Pinker, D. Wolff, M. Diamond, M. Pollen, E. Watters, and A. Reverman, The stuff of thought: Language as a window into human nature, Penguin, 2019.
T. Jay, K. King, and T. Duncan, “Memories of punishment for cursing,” Sex Roles, vol. 55, no. 1–2, pp. 123–133, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. L. Patton, M. Asken, W. J. Fremouw, and R. Bemis, “The influence of police profanity on public perception of excessive force,” Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 340–357, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. E. Stone, M. McMillan, and M. Hazelton, “Back to swear one: a review of English language literature on swearing and cursing in western health settings,” Aggression and Violent Behavior, vol. 25, pp. 65–74, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. E. Cavanna and H. Rickards, “The psychopathological spectrum of Gilles de La Tourette syndrome,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1008–1015, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Jay, “The utility and ubiquity of taboo words,” Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 153–161, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. D. Long, “English at large--the mother tongue: English & how it got that way by Bill Bryson,” Technical Communication, vol. 41, no. 3, p. 509, 1994.
View at: Google Scholar
L. W. McGarrity, “What the F: What Swearing Reveals about Our Language, Our Brains, and Ourselves by Benjamin K. Bergen,” Language, vol. 93, no. 4, pp. e372–e374, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. G. Goldin and R. Fasold, “The sociolinguistics of society,” The Modern Language Journal, vol. 69, no. 4, p. 424, 1985.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Holmes, An introduction to sociolinguistics, vol. 28, Routledge, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site
N. S. Baron, “Instant messaging and the future of language,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 29–31, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Thomas, “Universal grammar and the interpretation of reflexives in a second language,” Language, vol. 67, no. 2, p. 211, 1991.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. F. Johnson and B. H. Jacobson, Eds., Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 2006.
L. A. Fast and D. C. Funder, “Personality as manifest in word use: correlations with self-report, acquaintance report, and behavior,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 334–346, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Jay, “Do offensive words harm people?” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 81–101, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. E. Stone and M. Hazelton, “An overview of swearing and its impact on mental health nursing practice,” International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 208–214, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Aristar-dry, The use of fuck: a sociolinguistic approach to the usage of fuck in the BNC and Blog Authorship Corpus, R. Howe, Ed., Thesis Submitted to the Department of English Language and Literature Eastern Michigan University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requiremen, 2012, http://commons.emich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1782&context=theses.
Y. Baruch and S. Jenkins, “Swearing at work and permissive leadership culture,” Leadership & Organization Development Journal, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 492–507, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R.-E. Mercury, “Swearing: a ‘bad’ part of language; a good part of language learning,” TESL Canada Journal, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 28, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Ginsburg, S. M. Ogletree, and T. D. Silakowski, “Vulgar language: review of sex differences in usage, attributions, and pathologies,” North American Journal of Psychology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 105–116, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
D. L. Paletz and W. F. Harris, “Four-letter threats to authority,” The Journal of Politics, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 955–979, 1975.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Rassin and S. Van Der Heijden, “Appearing credible? Swearing helps!,” Psychology, Crime & Law, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 177–182, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. L. Robbins, E. S. Focella, S. Kasle, A. M. López, K. L. Weihs, and M. R. Mehl, “Naturalistically observed swearing, emotional support, and depressive symptoms in women coping with illness,” Health Psychology, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 789–792, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. D. Rothwell, “Verbal obscenity: time for second thoughts,” Western Speech, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 231–242, 1971.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. W. Selnow, “Sex differences in uses and perceptions of profanity,” Sex Roles, vol. 12, no. 3–4, pp. 303–312, 1985.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Stephens and C. Umland, “Swearing as a response to pain--effect of daily swearing frequency,” Journal of Pain, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 1274–1281, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. K. Kaye and B. S. Sapolsky, “Taboo or not taboo? That is the question: offensive language on prime-time broadcast and cable programming,” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 22–37, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. S. Sapolsky and B. K. Kaye, “The use of offensive language by men and women in prime time television entertainment,” Atlantic Journal of Communication, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 292–303, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. R. Scherer and B. J. Sagarin, “Indecent influence: the positive effects of obscenity on persuasion,” Social Influence, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 138–146, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Dewaele, “The emotional force of swearwords and taboo words in the speech of multilinguals,” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, vol. 25, no. 2–3, pp. 204–222, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. C. Alarde, R. Antolihao, K. B. Bagares et al., “Determining the benefits of using profanity in expressing emotions of grade 12 students in FCIC,” in 10th International Conference on Arts, Social Sciences, Humanities and Interdisciplinary Studies (ASSHIS-17), Manila (Philippines), 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Daly, J. Holmes, J. Newton, and M. Stubbe, “Expletives as solidarity signals in FTAs on the factory floor,” Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 945–964, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Stephens, J. Atkins, and A. Kingston, “Swearing as a response to pain,” Neuroreport, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 1056–1060, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Montagu, “On the physiology and psychology of swearing,” Psychiatry (New York), vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 189–201, 1942.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Jay, Why We Curse, John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site
G. J. Maier and R. D. Miller, “Toward the therapeutic use of obscene language: a legal and clinical review,” Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 227–243, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Goddard, “‘Swear words’ and ‘curse words’ in Australian (and American) English. at the Crossroads of Pragmatics, Semantics and Sociolinguistics,” in Intercultural Pragmatics, De Gruyter Mouton, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Finn, “Swearing: the good, the bad & the ugly,” Ortesol Journal, vol. 34, pp. 17–26, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Jay, C. Caldwell-Harris, and K. King, “Recalling taboo and nontaboo words,” American Journal of Psychology, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 83–103, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Steven, D. Wolff, M. Diamond, M. Pollen, E. Watters, and A. Reverman, The stuff of thought: Language as a window into human nature, Penguin, 2019.
G. Feldman, H. Lian, M. Kosinski, and D. Stillwell, “Frankly, we do give a damn: the relationship between profanity and honesty,” Social Psychological and Personality Science, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 816–826, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Husain, F. Ahmed, and M. Bokhari, “The Prevalence and Predictors of Profanity among Men and Women from a Collectivistic Culture,” 2023, (Submitted for publication).
View at: Google Scholar
W. Husain and A. Gulzar, “Translation, adaptation and validation of depression, anxiety and stress scale in Urdu,” Insights on the Depression and Anxiety, vol. 4, no. 1, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. F. Lovibond and S. H. Lovibond, “The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the Beck depression and anxiety inventories,” Behaviour Research and Therapy, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 335–343, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. A. Clark and D. Watson, “Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications,” Journal of Abnormal Psychology, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 316–336, 1991.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. S. Endler, S. D. Macrodimitris, and N. L. Kocovski, “Anxiety and depression: congruent, separate, or both?” Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 42–60, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Watson, K. Weber, J. S. Assenheimer, L. A. Clark, M. E. Strauss, and R. A. McCormick, “Testing a tripartite model: I. evaluating the convergent and discriminant validity of anxiety and depression symptom scales,” Journal of Abnormal Psychology, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 3–14, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. A. Brown, B. F. Chorpita, W. Korotitsch, and D. H. Barlow, “Psychometric properties of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) in clinical samples,” Behaviour Research and Therapy, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 79–89, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. P. Clara, B. J. Cox, and M. W. Enns, “Confirmatory factor analysis of the depression-anxiety-stress scales in depressed and anxious patients,” Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 61–67, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. R. Crawford and J. D. Henry, “The depression anxiety stress scales (DASS): normative data and latent structure in a large non-clinical sample,” British Journal of Clinical Psychology, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 111–131, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Nieuwenhuijsen, A. G. E. M. De Boer, J. H. A. M. Verbeek, R. W. B. Blonk, and F. J. H. Van Dijk, “The depression anxiety stress scales (DASS): detecting anxiety disorder and depression in employees absent from work because of mental health problems,” Occupational and Environmental Medicine, vol. 60, no. >90001, pp. 77i–782, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. H. Ridner, “Psychological distress: concept analysis,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 536–545, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Andrews, M. J. Hobbs, T. D. Borkovec et al., “Generalized worry disorder: a review of DSM-IV generalized anxiety disorder and options for DSM-V,” Depression and Anxiety, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 134–147, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. T. Fogarty, S. Sharma, V. K. Chetty, and L. Culpepper, “Mental health conditions are associated with increased health care utilization among urban family medicine patients,” Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 398–407, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Hawkins, P. Scott Richards, H. Mac Granley, and D. M. Stein, “The impact of exposure to the thin-ideal media image on women,” Eating Disorders, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 35–50, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Hunt, T. Slade, and G. Andrews, “Generalized anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder comorbidity in the National Survey of Mental Health and Well-Being,” Depression and Anxiety, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 23–31, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Tyrer and D. Baldwin, Generalised Anxiety Disorder, vol. 368, Lancet. Elsevier B.V, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site
A. M. Ruscio, W. T. Chiu, P. Roy-Byrne et al., “Broadening the definition of generalized anxiety disorder: effects on prevalence and associations with other disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication,” Journal of Anxiety Disorders, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 662–676, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. J. Martens, P. De Jonge, B. Na, B. E. Cohen, H. Lett, and M. A. Whooley, “Scared to death? Generalized anxiety disorder and cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary heart disease: the heart and soul study,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 67, no. 7, pp. 750–758, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Denollet, K. Maas, A. Knottnerus, J. J. Keyzer, and V. J. Pop, “Anxiety predicted premature all-cause and cardiovascular death in a 10-year follow-up of middle-aged women,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 452–456, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. C. Phillips, G. David Batty, C. R. Gale et al., “Generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and their comorbidity as predictors of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: the Vietnam experience study,” Psychosomatic Medicine, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 395–403, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Collins, V. Patel, S. S. Joestl et al., “Grand challenges in global mental health,” Nature, vol. 475, no. 7354, pp. 27–30, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. D. Mathers and D. Loncar, “Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 3, no. 11, p. e442, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Bromet, L. H. Andrade, I. Hwang et al., “Cross-national epidemiology of DSM-IV major depressive episode,” BMC Medicine, vol. 9, no. 1, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. E. Egede, “Depression: greater effect on overall health than angina, arthritis, asthma or diabetes,” Evidence-Based Mental Health, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 57, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Gutiérrez-Rojas, A. Porras-Segovia, H. Dunne, N. Andrade-González, and J. A. Cervilla, “Prevalence and correlates of major depressive disorder: a systematic review,” Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 657–672, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Husain, “Prevalent tendencies for mental disorders in Pakistan,” Clínica y Salud, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 34–38, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. C. Kessler, T. C. Wai, O. Demler, and E. E. Walters, “Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 617–627, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Whooley and J. M. Wong, “Depression and cardiovascular disorders,” Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 327–354, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Cuijpers and F. Smit, “Excess mortality in depression: a meta-analysis of community studies,” Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 227–236, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Chesney, G. M. Goodwin, and S. Fazel, “Risks of all-cause and suicide mortality in mental disorders: a meta-review,” World Psychiatry, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 153–160, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Turecki and D. A. Brent, “Suicide and suicidal behaviour,” The Lancet, vol. 387, no. 10024, pp. 1227–1239, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Husain and F. A. Faize, “Public awareness of psychological problems in Pakistan,” Mental Health Review Journal, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 35–45, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Husain, “Components of psychosocial health,” Health Education, vol. 122, no. 4, pp. 387–401, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Husain, “Barriers in seeking psychological help: public perception in Pakistan,” Community Mental Health Journal, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 75–78, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Husain, A. Gulzar, and S. Tofail, “How Pakistanis cope with stress?” Pakistan Perspectives, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 189–206, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
A. M. Kring, D. A. Smith, and J. M. Neale, “Individual differences in dispositional expressiveness: development and validation of the emotional expressivity scale,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 934–949, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Maslow, Toward a psychology of being, D Van Nostrand, Princeton, 1962.
View at: Publisher Site
V. Negovan, “Dimensions of students’ psychosocial well-being and their measurement: validation of a students’ psychosocial well being inventory,” Europe’s Journal of Psychology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 85–104, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Z. Tan, E. E. Forbes, R. E. Dahl et al., “Emotional reactivity and regulation in anxious and nonanxious youth: a cell- phone ecological momentary assessment study,” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 197–206, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. L. Rock, J. P. Roiser, W. J. Riedel, and A. D. Blackwell, “Cognitive impairment in depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Psychological Medicine, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 2029–2040, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. R. Edwards, C. Campbell, R. N. Jamison, and K. Wiech, “The neurobiological underpinnings of coping with pain,” Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 237–241, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Engelthaler and T. T. Hills, “Humor norms for 4,997 English words,” Behavior Research Methods, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 1116–1124, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Philipp and L. Lombardo, “Hurt feelings and four letter words: swearing alleviates the pain of social distress,” European Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 517–523, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. S. Robertson, S. J. Robinson, and R. Stephens, “Swearing as a response to pain: A cross-cultural comparison of British and Japanese participants,” Scandinavian Journal of Pain, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 267–272, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Stephens and O. Robertson, “Swearing as a response to pain: assessing hypoalgesic effects of novel ‘swear’ words,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 11, p. 723, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Wiech, M. Ploner, and I. Tracey, “Neurocognitive aspects of pain perception,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 306–313, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. G. MacKay and M. V. Ahmetzanov, “Emotion, memory, and attention in the taboo Stroop paradigm,” Psychological Science, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 25–32, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. J. Heubusch and J. J. Horan, “Some effects of counselor profanity in counseling,” Journal of Counseling Psychology, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 456–458, 1977.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Phillips and H. Kassinove, “Effects of profanity, touch, and sex of the counselor on perceptions of the counselor and behavioral compliance: implications for rational-emotive therapists,” Journal of Rational-Emotive Therapy, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 3–12, 1987.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. V. Paradise, B. Cohl, and J. Zweig, “Effects of profane language and physical attractiveness on perceptions of counselor behavior,” Journal of Counseling Psychology, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 620–624, 1980.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. L. Kottke and C. D. MacLeod, “Use of profanity in the counseling interview,” Psychological Reports, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 627–634, 1989.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. N. Bostrom, J. R. Baseheart, and C. M. Rossiter, “The effects of three types of profane language in persuasive messages,” Journal of Communication, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 461–475, 1973.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Feldman, “The use of obscene words in the therapeutic relationship,” The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 45–48, 1955.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Kurklen and H. Kassinove, “Effects of profanity, touch, and Subject’s religiosity on perceptions of a psychologist and behavioral compliance,” Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 131, no. 6, pp. 899–901, 1991.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. A. Wiley and D. C. Locke, “Profanity as a critical variable in counseling,” Counselor Education and Supervision, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 245–252, 1982.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Braswell, “Four-letter word games: the psychology of obscenity,” Journal of Music Therapy, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 146, 1967.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. D. Holmes and B. W. Smith, “Intergroup dynamics of extra-legal police aggression: an integrated theory of race and place,” Aggression and Violent Behavior, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 344–353, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Husain, “Women are the better halves: gender-based variations in virtues and character strengths,” Journal of Human Values, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 103–114, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. E. Bebbington, H. Meltzer, T. S. Brugha et al., “Unequal access and unmet need: neurotic disorders and the use of primary care services,” Psychological Medicine, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1359–1367, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. L. Brescoll and E. L. Uhlmann, “Can an angry woman get ahead?” Psychological Science, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 268–275, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. E. Gibson and R. R. Callister, “Anger in organizations: review and integration,” Journal of Management, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 66–93, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Jay, Cursing in America: a psycholinguistic study of dirty language in the courts, in the Movies, in the Schoolyards and on the Streets. World of Irish Nursing, vol. 10, John Benjamins Publishing, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site
A. M. Kring, “Gender and anger,” Gender and Emotion, vol. 211, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. A. Moss-Racusin, J. E. Phelan, and L. A. Rudman, “When men break the gender rules: status incongruity and backlash against modest men,” Psychology of Men & Masculinity, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 140–151, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. E. Phelan, C. A. Moss-Racusin, and L. A. Rudman, “Competent yet out in the cold: shifting criteria for hiring reflect backlash toward agentic women,” Psychology of Women Quarterly, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 406–413, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. A. Rudman and P. Glick, “Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women,” Journal of Social Issues, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 743–762, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Timmers, A. H. Fischer, and A. S. R. Manstead, “Gender differences in motives for regulating emotions,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 974–985, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Winters and S. Duck, “You!: swearing as an aversive and a relational activity,” in Behaving Badly: Aversive Behaviors in Interpersonal Relationships, pp. 59–77, American Psychological Association, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Bayard and S. Krishnayya, “Gender, expletive use, and context: male and female expletive use in structured and unstructured conversation among New Zealand University students,” Women and Language, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
D. I. Johnson and N. Lewis, “Perceptions of swearing in the work setting: an expectancy violations theory perspective,” Communication Reports, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 106–118, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. D. Klerk, “Expletives: men only?” Communication Monographs, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 156–169, 1991.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. T. Ng, Is there a crass ceiling?: the effects of gender on perceptions of profanity usage at work, no. 1605495, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2015.

Copyright

Copyright © 2023 Waqar Husain et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

2445

Downloads

732

Citations