Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine / 2012 / Article
Special Issue

Complementary and Alternative Medicine and Cancer Survivorship

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 676984 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/676984

Maria do Carmo Santos Araújo, Iria Luiza Farias, Jessie Gutierres, Sergio L. Dalmora, Nélia Flores, Julia Farias, Ivana de Cruz, Juarez Chiesa, Vera Maria Morsch, Maria Rosa Chitolina Schetinger, "Uncaria tomentosa—Adjuvant Treatment for Breast Cancer: Clinical Trial", Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2012, Article ID 676984, 8 pages, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/676984

Uncaria tomentosa—Adjuvant Treatment for Breast Cancer: Clinical Trial

Academic Editor: Alyson Huntley
Received15 Nov 2011
Revised26 Apr 2012
Accepted27 Apr 2012
Published28 Jun 2012


Breast cancer is the most frequent neoplasm affecting women worldwide. Some of the recommended treatments involve chemotherapy whose toxic effects include leukopenia and neutropenia. This study assessed the effectiveness of Uncaria tomentosa (Ut) in reducing the adverse effects of chemotherapy through a randomized clinical trial. Patients with Invasive Ductal Carcinoma—Stage II, who underwent a treatment regimen known as FAC (Fluorouracil, Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide), were divided into two groups: the UtCa received chemotherapy plus 300 mg dry Ut extract per day and the Ca group that only received chemotherapy and served as the control experiment. Blood samples were collected before each one of the six chemotherapy cycles and blood counts, immunological parameters, antioxidant enzymes, and oxidative stress were analyzed. Uncaria tomentosa reduced the neutropenia caused by chemotherapy and was also able to restore cellular DNA damage. We concluded that Ut is an effective adjuvant treatment for breast cancer.

1. Introduction

Breast cancer is the most frequent neoplasm affecting women worldwide, both in terms of incidence and mortality. The disease is more common in developed countries with its highest incidence being observed in the United Kingdom, Australia, USA, and Canada. From invasive tumors, ductal carcinoma and its variants represent 80% of cases [1] and the proportion of women with tumors in clinical stages I and II increased from 41 to 65% in the last decade [1, 2]. About 70% of breast cancers express Estrogen hormone receptors and/or Progesterone receptor [3]. These markers along with the HER-2 receptor (c-erbB2) provide information about the tumor and how it might respond to different treatments [4].

Chemotherapy is among the recommended treatments for breast cancer, which can be a single or combination therapy with multiple drugs. Chemotherapy drugs have very narrow therapeutic indexes in terms of nonselective toxic effects on normal tissues, with neutropenia being the most frequently observed adverse reaction, which increases the risk of infections [5].

Pharmacological interventions that reduce or prevent adverse effects may have a substantial impact on cancer treatment. According to World Health Organization (WHO), 80% of the population use medicinal plants as alternative or complementary procedures for the treatment of their diseases [6].

Studies have reported the use of herbal medicines in cancer patients to minimize the effects of chemotherapy. Uncaria tomentosa (Utor Cat’s Claw) is a medicinal herb that has been used in the treatment of different diseases including cancer. Patients who use Cat’s Claw along with traditional cancer therapies, such as chemotherapy and radiation, reported fewer adverse effects to those therapies [7]. Uthelps in the restoration of cellular DNA, preventing mutations and cell damages caused by chemotherapy drugs [8]. It modulates the activity in the immune system, such as the proliferation of normal T and B lymphocytes [9], also modulating certain cytokines, including IL-1 and IL-6, TNF- [10]. In addition, it has antioxidant properties [11]. Its direct myelostimulating effects, through myelopoiesis stimulation and Colony-Stimulating Factors (G-CSF) [8, 12], seem to be a beneficial option to minimize the risks associated with neutropenia.

Numerous reports present a theoretical understanding of Ut action mechanisms, but none of these studies consisted of clinical trials. Thus the objectives of this study are situated in this context, which consisted of a clinical trial using Uncaria tomentosa Herbarium tablets, as adjuvant treatment for breast cancer.

2. Methods

2.1. Design and Patients

A randomized interventional study was performed. It was carried out with 40 patients who had undergone complete breast cancer resection, which was histologically diagnosed as Invasive Ductal Carcinoma—Stage II [2], and who were going to begin adjuvant chemotherapy with Doxorubicin-based scheme for six cycles, at the Santa Maria University Hospital, Brazil.

Patients were randomly divided into two groups: the CaUt group, which was treated with six cycles chemotherapy + Ut and the cancer group (Ca), which only received six cycles of chemotherapy, according to the date treatment was started, as follows: the first patient who agreed to participate in the study was included into the CaUt group, the second, into the Ca group, and, thus, successively, until the end.

For the control group were invited to participate healthy women, classified by clinical trial, with similar age of the patients and that did not receive any medication in the last 30 days or have chronic disease.

Patients were part of the study during 6 chemotherapy cycles, of 21 days each. Medication dosage in the CaUt group was as follows: FAC (Fluorouracil, Doxorubicin, and Cyclophosphamide) and 3 tablets of Ut (Unha de Gato Herbarium), daily, from day 2 to day 21. The dose of Ut was similar to that used in previous studies, with 250–350 mg C-MED-100, in aqueous Ut extracts [13].

The calculation to estimate the sample size required for randomized clinical trial was performed according to Greenberg et al. [14], with constant significance level (α) of 5%, and statistical power of 90% ( 10%), using as reference the studies of Sheng et al. [15].

The Human Ethics Committee of the Santa Maria University Hospital, Brazil, approved the present study and informed consent was obtained from all participants (protocol number: 0169.0.0242.000-07.). All subjects were invited to participate and were informed in detail about the design of this study through a Statement of Consent signed by the researcher and participants. They were informed that they could be selected randomly for the Ca or UtCa group.

2.2. Materials

Each tablet of Unha de Gato Herbarium contained 100 mg of dry Uncaria tomentosa extract. Biological materials used in the tablets were derived from plants in their natural habitat. The Uncaria tomentosa extract was prepared by Ultra-turrax Extraction (Biotron, Kinematica AG) from ground bark (Centroflora) using 70% ethanol (Dipalcool). The HPLC analysis of the Ut dry extract presents 2.57% pentacyclic oxindole alkaloids (POAs) content, which was calculated with reference to external calibration curves of mitraphylline. The extract analysis showed absence of tetracyclic oxindole alkaloids in the sample, allowing its use for therapeutic and research purposes in accordance with the U.S. Pharmacopeia.

2.3. Sample Collection

Blood was collected into citrate, EDTA, heparin Vacutainer tubes, without any anticoagulants, before chemotherapy and after each of the 6 cycles.

2.4. Biochemical Parameters

A COBAS INTEGRA system was used for the quantitative determination of the blood chemical constituents, and data were acquired through a COBAS INTEGRA 400 Plus apparatus (USA).

2.5. Hemograms

Blood samples were analyzed using a Pentra apparatus (France). The lowest values were confirmed by observation of slides, using a May Grünwald-Giemsa Stain and optical microscopy.

2.6. CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ Cells

Samples were collected in EDTA and analyses were performed using a three-color fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACSCalibur, Becton Dickinson Biosciences, United States) and a Multiset software (Becton Dickinson). FITC-conjugated anti-CD4, PE-conjugated anti-CD8, and PerCP-conjugated anti-CD3 were used. Immune subpopulations were measured as a percentage of the total CD3+ cell number.

2.7. Interleukin 6 (IL-6)

ELISA assays of IL-6 were carried out according to a previously published method [16], at room temperature in Microtiter 96-Well Plates (Nunc-Immuno Plate MaxiSorp) and optical densities (O.D.) at 490 nm, which were determined using a Microplate Reader (Thermo Scientific Multiskan FC, Vantaa, Finland).

2.8. Single Cell Gel Electrophoresis (Comet Assay)

The alkaline comet assay was performed as described by Singh et al. [17] in accordance with the general guidelines for use of the comet assay [18, 19]. Lymphocytes were suspended in 0.7% low-melting-point agarose and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at 37°C and placed on microscopic slides with a layer of 1% agarose. The slides were immersed in lysis solution at 4°C for 1 h and followed by electrophoresis at 25 V, 300 mA, for 40 min at steady temperature. The slides were then silver-stained, as described by Nadin et al. [20]. All steps, from sample collection to electrophoresis, were conducted under yellow light to minimize the possibility of cellular DNA damage. One hundred cells (50 cells from each of the two replicate slides) were selected and analyzed. Cells were visually scored according to tail length and received scores from 0 (no migration) to 4 (maximal migration). Therefore, the damage index for cells ranged from 0 (all cells with no migration representing a damage index of 0%) to 400 (all cells with maximal migration, representing a damage index of 100%). The slides were analyzed under blind conditions by at least two different individuals [21].

2.9. Carbonylation of Serum Protein

The carbonylation of serum proteins was determined by a modified Levine’s method [22]. The absorbance of the supernatant at 370 nm was measured using a spectrophotometer. Carbonyl content was calculated using  mM−1 cm−1 as the molar extinction coefficient, and the results were expressed as nanomoles of carbonyl groups per milligram protein.

2.10. Determination of Lipid Peroxidation

Lipid peroxidation was estimated by measuring TBARS levels in plasma samples according to a modified method of Jentzsch et al. [23]. The concentration of malondialdehyde (MDA) was determined by measuring the absorbance at 532 nm using a spectrophotometer. The results were expressed as nanomoles of MDA per milliliter of plasma.

2.11. Catalase (CAT) and Superoxide Dismutase (SOD) Activities

CAT activity was determined in accordance with a modified method of Nelson and Kiesow [24]. The change in absorbance at 240 nm was measured for 2 min. CAT activity was calculated using the molar extinction coefficient (0.046 mM−1 cm−1), and the results were expressed as picomoles of CAT per milligram of protein.

SOD activity was determined based on the inhibition of the radical superoxide reaction with adrenaline as described by McCord and Fridovich [25]. SOD activity is determined by measuring the rate of adrenochrome formation, observed at 480 nm, in a medium containing glycine-NaOH (50 mM, pH 10) and adrenaline (1 mM).

2.12. Statistics

Results are expressed as deviation. The statistical analysis was performed with Graph-Pad Prism 5.0 (GraphPad Prism 5.0 Software Inc., USA) using the Student’s t-test. was considered to represent a significant difference in all tests.

3. Results

All patients (40) included in the trial had Breast Cancer, Invasive Ductal Carcinoma—Stages II A or II B, according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the American Cancer Society (ACS) staging systems [2].

The general characteristics of patients and controls who participated in the study are described in Table 1.

Clinical parametersControl Ca UtCa

Age interval32–7932–7140–75
Mean age
Cholesterol levels
Estrogen receptor status (ER)
Progesterone receptor status (PR)
HER-2 receptor status (HER2)*

The results for ER, HER2, and REP are represented as positive and negative numbers for the expression of receptors by number of women, while other parameters are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. UtCa group: patients treated with chemotherapy +300 mg Uncaria tomentosa daily ; Ca group: patients received chemotherapy ; control group .
*To HER-2 receiver only data were obtained from 18 patients.

To evaluate the effectiveness of Ut as adjuvant treatment for breast cancer, haematological parameters were used and analyzed (Table 2). At day zero, the results of the haematological parameters analyzed in the blood count did not significantly differ among the Control, the Ca, and the UtCa groups. A greater reduction in the white blood cell (WBCs) and the neutrophil counts were observed in the Ca group along the treatment, differently from the UtCa group, which remained closely the reference values, obtained in the control group (Figure 1). Considering the lymphocytes number, a significant difference between the control group and the groups of patients with breast cancer, either treated or not with Ut in the chemotherapy cycles, was observed. ( ). Monocytes number in patients with breast cancer (treated and not treated with Ut) at 5-6 chemotherapy cycles were higher than control group, but in the UtCa group, this increase was more strong (Table 2).

(cells/mm3) 0 1-2 3-4 5-6

 Control2264 ± 490,6
 UtCa2276 ± 503,32376 ± 708,11627 ± 578,7*1411 ± 596,6*
 Ca2177 ± 453,32284 ± 867,91460 ± 512,5*1208 ± 395,1*
 Control487,6 ± 128,9
 UtCa515,3 ± 169560 ± 322814,9 ± 309#817 ± 444,6
 Ca541,6 ± 161526,6 ± 154654,1 ± 310*#500,9 ± 226*#

Data expressed asmean ± standard deviation.
*Represent difference significant between the Ca and UtCa groups, P <0.05.
#Represent difference significant of the control group, P <0.05 (Student’s t-test).

To evaluate the immune response of patients with breast cancer, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells (absolute count and ratio) and IL-6 levels were analyzed. During the chemotherapy treatment cycles, no significant difference was observed between groups. There was no difference between groups for any of the parameters analyzed (Table 3).

ParametersGroupChemotherapy cycles

CD4+ T cellsUtCa1008.25 (379.21)786.60 (310.49)
Cells/μLCa1053.00 (620.81)798.00 (366.14)

CD8+ T cellsUt Ca568.81 (295.60)459.87 (246.46)
Cells/μLCa679.84 (273.22)565.62 (231.05)

CD4+ T/CD8+ T ratioUtCa 2.044 (0.62)1.858 (0.89)
Ca1.630 (0.69)1.652 (0.49)

IL6UtCa3.4 (4.50)2.1 (6.6)
pg/mLCa5.6 (5.53)3.8 (7.312)

Data expressed as mean ± standard deviation; UtCa group: patients treated with chemotherapy +300 mg Uncaria tomentosa daily ; Ca group: patients received chemotherapy .

No correlation between the IL-6, CD4+ T/CD8+ T ratio and age, body mass index, and hormone receptor status was found (data not shown).

Antioxidant defenses were analyzed by the activity of Superoxide Dismutase (SOD) and Catalase (CAT) compared to treatment cycles zero and six, as well as between the UtCa and the Ca groups. There were no statistically significant differences among groups. An increase in SOD enzyme when compared to treatment cycles zero and six for the group supplemented with Ut was observed, but that difference was not observed between the groups (UtCa = 11.53 U/mg protein, Ca = 11.43 U/mg protein) or at the end of treatment (17.32 U/mg protein, 11.74 U/mg protein). Lipid Peroxidation was also estimated by the TBARS scale and the carbonylation of serum proteins, but there was no difference between groups (UtCa and Ca).

The protective effect of chemotherapy to extract Ut was evaluated by the Comet Assay. In the start of the treatment (zero cycle), the Ca group and UtCa group showed no significant difference in the Comet assay index. However, in the sixth cycle (end of the treatment), it was observed a significant decrease in the index test in the UtCa group, when compared to the Ca group ( ) Figure 2.

4. Discussion

Uncaria tomentosa enables the stimulation of the immune system, increasing resistance to diseases when the body is immunosuppressed due to stress, malnutrition, or due to the effect of some medication.

Many herbal medicines are used for various purposes, in various combinations (along with allopathic and homeopathic, medicines, etc.) based on historical or personal evidences generally not being associated with any adverse effects [26]. Therefore, this study, through a randomized clinical trial, evaluated the efficacy of Ut as a complementary therapy to chemotherapy.

The cytotoxic effect of chemotherapeutic agents is not selective for neoplastic cells, being also harmful to other body cells. Hematopoietic suppression is the major complication limiting dosage of such cytostatic agents; neutropenia and thrombocytopenia are the most frequent ones [1]. Treatment should be discontinued when neutrophil count is below 500 cells/mm3 [27]. Thus, the success of the treatment process depends on the neutrophils content. Prevention of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia should be considered a clinical priority [28]. Once it is known that neutropenia predisposes to serious infections, often resulting in delays in treatment cycles and dose reductions.

Treatment using a daily dose of 300 mg dry Ut extract was effective in reducing the main chemotherapy effect, which is neutropenia. The effects of chemotherapy on blood cells tend to become more pronounced during treatment. However, our results show that in cycle six, which corresponds to the end of chemotherapy, the differences in the leukocytes and neutrophils counts were even more significant, as the group that was supplemented with Ut presented values twice as high of neutrophils when compared to the cancer group (without supplementation). In the group without supplementation, 67.89% of patients had neutropenia. Similarly, there was an increase in activated monocytes, as the activated precursors were common to both strains.

Our findings are corroborated by other studies that had already shown that the Ut extract has a stimulating effect on growth and differentiates the CFU-GM from mice bone marrow and spleen, using the model for listeriosis [29]. Increased leukocytes numbers were also detected using Ut aqueous extract for six consecutive weeks in volunteers [13]. The recovery of leukocytes was also observed in mice using a model for chemotherapy-induced leukopenia (Doxorubicin) using Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (Neupogen) as a positive control [15].

Our group confirmed these results using a model for ifosfamide-induced neutropenia in mice, which caused a severe neutropenia. Bioassays showed that treatment with Ut significantly increased neutrophils counts, and a power of 85.2% was calculated in relation to Filgrastim (rhG-CSF) at the corresponding doses tested (5 and 15 mg/day of Ut, and 3 and 9 mcg/day Filgrastim, resp.) [13]. Through in vitro assays in human hematopoietic stem precursor cells (hHSPCs) obtained from umbilical cord blood (UCB), we reach the conclusion that this effect happened due to proliferation of Forming Units-Granulocyte-Macrophage (CFU-GM) [13].

In this study, no differences were observed in lymphocyte counts between groups, either supplemented or not with Ut, over the chemotherapy cycles; however, its counts presented decrease due to chemotherapy when compared to the control group. These differences were not observed in the CD4+ and CD8+ subpopulations.

This paper reports the effects of different Uncaria tomentosa extracts. The aqueous extract that has the highest concentration of quinic acid and low concentrations of oxindole alkaloids, being related to immunomodulatory properties is mediated by cytokines such as TNF- [30]. Clinical studies using 20 mg/day of Uncaria tomentosa extract for 2 to 5 months in patients with HIV, receiving no other therapy, showed an increase in total peripheral lymphocytes without significant changes in the proportion of CD4+ and CD8+ [31]. Healthy volunteers receiving 350 mg of aqueous Ut extract for 8 weeks showed leukocytosis, with a tendency to higher proliferation of lymphocytes [15]. In an animal model, using aqueous extract, which has the highest concentration of quinic acid and low concentrations of oxindole alkaloids, an increase in lymphocytes was also observed [15, 32].

Furthermore, alcoholic extracts and/or pentacyclic oxindole alkaloids have higher myeloproliferative effects [33, 34]. Other studies have shown that the increase in the lymphocyte counts happens due to increased survival rates rather than proliferation [32].

Thus, changes observed in lymphocytes are associated with the chemically active components defined as quinic and bioactive acid esters in vivo, as quinic acid present in the aqueous extract used by authors. In our study, hydroalcoholic extract was used.

High levels of circulating IL-6 are associated with worse survival rates for patients with metastatic breast cancer, being correlated to the extent of the disease [30].

The patients who comprised our sample did not present a negative progression during the treatment cycles, that is, there was no occurrence of relapses or increased lesion extent, which could lead to an increase in IL-6.

Different Uncaria tomentosa extracts were tested in vitro in order to determine their antioxidant activity. Aqueous and alcoholic extracts prevent the production of reaction products with thiobarbituric acid (TBARS) and, therefore, damage the cytoplasmic membrane (lipids) and DNA by the nonformation of free radicals [35, 36] among the evaluated parameters of oxidative stress, such as SOD, CAT, TBARS, and carbonylated proteins.

Women with breast cancer present an increase in blood concentrations of oxidized substances, such as products derived from lipids peroxidation, proteins, and DNA [32, 33].

The only observed differences were in the SOD enzyme between groups, either with or without supplementation with Ut. These results were also found in an animal model, where an increase in the activity of this enzyme [10] was perceived. In a study on women with breast cancer, SOD activity showed a significant increase regardless of clinical stage and menopausal status [31]. There is evidence that the state of oxidative stress is higher than the greater degree of the disease stage is [37, 38].

Similar to results found in IL-6, the fact that all patients in the study had Stage II cancer may explain the results found.

The ability of doxorubicin to bind itself to the cell membrane lipid can affect a variety of cellular functions. The reaction of the doxorubicin enzymatic reduction by a variety of oxidase, reductase, and dehydrogenases genes generates ROS and, thus, may result in damage to DNA and proteins, triggering apoptosis [39, 40].

The performance of antioxidants in vivo depends on the types of free radicals formed, where and how these radicals are generated, and what are the doses for optimal protection. So it is entirely possible for an antioxidant to act as a protector in any given systems, but it is also possible for it to fail to protect, or even increase lesions induced in other systems or tissues. Thus, the use of antioxidants in cancer treatment is controversial.

Ambrosone and colleagues [41] observed that women having breast cancer with genotypes that result in higher levels of ROS had better survival rates than those with genotypes associated with lower generations of ROS. Such results indicate that an increased oxidative stress may increase the effects of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, resulting in improved treatment efficacy and, thus, better survival rates. The overexpression of SOD is associated with better survival rates for patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer [42].

Cleveland and Kastan suggest that a promising treatment for some types of cancer could happen by increasing ROS levels and inhibiting SOD levels [43, 44]. Other authors report that the overexpression of SOD has presented resistance to doxorubicin [43, 44], but not 5-fluorouracil in gastric cells [41]. Another study on breast cancer cells showed an increased resistance to Adriamycin with the intracellular level of glutathione (GSH) [45].

The protective effect of Ut on DNA was observed during the breast cancer cycles of treatment, by the Comet test analysis.

Doxorubicin has its own mechanism of action related to its binding to the DNA and the inhibition of nucleic acid synthesis. Studies have shown that aqueous Ut extracts present DNA repairing activities [15]. Mammone et al. (2006) showed the ability to modulate Uncaria tomentosa and repair of DNA in human skin and organ cultures [46].

In the present study, the results of comet test suggest that Ut had a protective effect of the DNA during the treatment cycles. However, it is necessary for other studies to confirm these effects.

5. Conclusions

Uncaria tomentosa, used at dose of 300 mg dry extract per day, is effective in the recovery from neutropenia induced by chemotherapy in women diagnosed with Invasive Ductal Carcinoma—Stage II. It is also able to restore cellular DNA. Thus, it is a safe and effective adjuvant treatment in reducing adverse chemotherapy effects.

Conflict of Interests

All authors deny any conflict of interests.


The authors would like to thank the physicians and patients at the Serviço de Hematologia/Oncologia (Department of Hematology/Oncology Services) of the Santa Maria University Hospital Brazil and Herbarium Botanic Laboratory. This work was supported by governmental funds: CNPq and CAPES.


  1. V. T. DeVita, T. S. Lawrence, and S. A. Rosenberg, DeVita, Hellman, and Rosenberg's Cancer: Principles & Practice of Oncology, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 8th edition, 2008.
  2. International Union Against Cancer—UICC, TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 6th edition, 2002, Edited by L.H. Sobin and Ch. Wittekind.
  3. T. Phillips, G. Murray, K. Wakamiya et al., “Development of standard estrogen and progesterone receptor immunohistochemical assays for selection of patients for antihormonal therapy,” Applied Immunohistochemistry and Molecular Morphology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 325–331, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. T. Anim, B. John, S. A. AbdulSathar S et al., “Relationship between the expression of various markers and prognostic factors in breast cancer,” Acta Histochemica, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 87–93, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. H. Ozer, J. O. Armitage, C. L. Bennett et al., “2000 Update of recommendations for the use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors: evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 18, no. 20, pp. 3558–3585, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  6. World Health Organization, Guidelines on Safety Monitoring of Herbal Medicines in Pharmacovigilance Systems, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2004.
  7. L. Riva, D. Coradini, G. Di Fronzo et al., “The antiproliferative effects of Uncaria tomentosa extracts and fractions on the growth of breast cancer cell line,” Anticancer Research, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 2457–2461, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  8. Y. Sheng, R. W. Pero, and H. Wagner, “Treatment of chemotherapy-induced leukopenia in a rat model with aqueous extract from Uncaria tomentosa,” Phytomedicine, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 137–143, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  9. M. Wurm, L. Kacani, G. Laus, K. Keplinger, and M. P. Dierich, “Pentacyclic oxindole alkaloids from Uncaria tomentosa induce human endothelial cells to release a lymphocyte-proliferation-regulating factor,” Planta Medica, vol. 64, no. 8, pp. 701–704, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. L. Allen-Hall, P. Cano, J. T. Arnason, R. Rojas, O. Lock, and R. M. Lafrenie, “Treatment of THP-1 cells with Uncaria tomentosa extracts differentially regulates the expression if IL-1β and TNF-α,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 312–317, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. R. Pilarski, H. Zielinski, D. Ciesiołka, and K. Gulewicz, “Antioxidant activity of ethanolic and aqueous extracts of Uncaria tomentosa (Willd.) DC,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 104, no. 1-2, pp. 18–23, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. I. Farias, M. D. C. Araújo, E. S. Zimmermann et al., “Uncaria tomentosa stimulates the proliferation of myeloid progenitor cells,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 137, no. 1, pp. 856–863, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. Y. Sheng, L. Li, K. Holmgren, and R. W. Pero, “DNA repair enhancement of aqueous extracts of Uncaria tomentosa in a human volunteer study,” Phytomedicine, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 275–282, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  14. R. S. Greenberg, S. R. Daniels, W. D. Flanders, J. W. Eley, and J. R. Boring, “Appendix A: estimation of sample size requirements for randomized controlled clinical trials,” in Medical Epidemiology, McGraw-Hill, Columbia, SC, USA, 4th edition, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  15. Y. Sheng, C. Bryngelsson, and R. W. Pero, “Enhanced DNA repair, immune function and reduced toxicity of C-MED-100(TM), a novel aqueous extract from Uncaria tomentosa,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 115–126, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. Y. S. Taktak, S. Selkirk, A. F. Bristow et al., “Assay of pyrogens by interleukin-6 release from monocytic cell lines,” Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 578–582, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  17. N. P. Singh, M. T. McCoy, R. R. Tice, and E. L. Schneider, “A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 175, no. 1, pp. 184–191, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  18. R. R. Tice, E. Agurell, D. Anderson et al., “Single cell gel/comet assay: guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing,” Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 206–221, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. A. Hartmann, E. Agurell, C. Beevers et al., “Recommendations for conducting the in vivo alkaline comet assay,” Mutagenesis, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 45–51, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. S. B. Nadin, L. M. Vargas-Roig, and D. R. Ciocca, “A silver staining method for single-cell gel assay,” Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 1183–1186, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  21. A. Collins, M. Ai-Guo, and S. J. Duthie, “A cinética de Mut reparação de danos no ADN oxidativo (quebras de fita e pirimidinas oxidados) em células humanas,” Mutation Research, vol. 336, pp. 69–77, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  22. R. L. Levine, D. Garland, C. N. Oliver et al., “Determination of carbonyl content in oxidatively modified proteins,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 186, pp. 464–478, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. A. M. Jentzsch, H. Bachmann, P. Fürst, and H. K. Biesalski, “Improved analysis of malondialdehyde in human body fluids,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 251–256, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. D. P. Nelson and L. A. Kiesow, “Enthalpy of decomposition of hydrogen peroxide by catalase at 25° C (with molar extinction coefficients of H2O2 solutions in the UV),” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 474–478, 1972. View at: Google Scholar
  25. J. M. McCord and I. Fridovich, “Superoxide dismutase. An enzymic function for erythrocuprein (hemocuprein),” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 244, no. 22, pp. 6049–6055, 1969. View at: Google Scholar
  26. S. Z. Rahman and K. C. Singhal, “Problems in pharmacovigilance of medicinal products of herbal origin and means to minimize them,” Uppsala Reports, vol. 17, pp. 1–4, 2002, WHO Collaborating Center for ADR monitoring, Uppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden. View at: Google Scholar
  27. National Cancer Institute (NCI), “Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v. 3.0 (CTCAE),” http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/ctcaev3.pdf. View at: Google Scholar
  28. J. Crawford, D. C. Dale, and G. H. Lyman, “Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: risks, consequences, and new directions for its management,” Cancer, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 228–237, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. S. Eberlin, L. M. B. Dos Santos, and M. L. S. Queiroz, “Uncaria tomentosa extract increases the number of myeloid progenitor cells in the bone marrow of mice infected with Listeria monocytogenes,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 5, no. 7-8, pp. 1235–1246, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. M. Sandoval, R. M. Charbonnet, N. N. Okuhama et al., “Cat's claw inhibits TNFα production and scavenges free radicals: role in cytoprotection,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 71–78, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. K. Keplinger, G. Laus, M. Wurm, M. P. Dierich, and H. Teppner, “Uncaria tomentosa (Willd.) DC.—ethnomedicinal use and new pharmacological, toxicological and botanical results,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 23–34, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. C. Akesson, R. W. Pero, and F. Ivars, “C-Med 100, a hot water extract of Uncaria tomentosa, prolongs lymphocyte survival in vivo,” Phytomedicine, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 23–33, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. D. G. Gimenez, E. G. Prado, T. S. Rodríguez, A. Fernández Arche, and R. De La Puerta, “Cytotoxic effect of the pentacyclic oxindole alkaloid mitraphylline isolated from Uncaria tomentosa bark on human ewing's sarcoma and breast cancer cell lines,” Planta Medica, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 133–136, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. R. Pilarski, B. Filip, J. Wietrzyk, M. Kuras, and K. Gulewicz, “Anticancer activity of the Uncaria tomentosa (Willd.) DC. preparations with different oxindole alkaloid composition,” Phytomedicine, vol. 17, no. 14, pp. 1133–1139, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. C. Desmarchelier, E. Mongelli, J. Coussio, and G. Ciccia, “Evaluation of the in vitro antioxidant activity in extracts of Uncaria tomentosa (Willd.) DC,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 254–256, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  36. C. Gonçalves, T. Dinis, and M. T. Batista, “Antioxidant properties of proanthocyanidins of Uncaria tomentosa bark decoction: a mechanism for anti-inflammatory activity,” Phytochemistry, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 89–98, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. G. Ray, S. Batra, N. K. Shukla et al., “Lipid peroxidation, free radical production and antioxidant status in breast cancer,” Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 163–170, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. M. Valko, J. Moncol, C. J. Rhodes, M. Izakovic, and M. Mazur, “Free radicals, metals and antioxidants in oxidative stress-induced cancer,” Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 160, no. 1, pp. 1–40, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. A. M. L. Janssen, C. B. Bosman, C. F. M. Sier et al., “Superoxide dismutases in relation to the overall survival of colorectal cancer patients,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 78, no. 8, pp. 1051–1057, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  40. B. Halliwell, “Oxidative stress and cancer: have we moved forward?” Biochemical Journal, vol. 401, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. C. B. Ambrosone, J. Ahn, K. K. Singh et al., “Polymorphisms in genes related to oxidative stress (MPO, MnSOD, CAT) and survival after treatment for breast cancer,” Cancer Research, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 1105–1111, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  42. G. C. Hur, S. J. Cho, C. H. Kim et al., “Manganese superoxide dismutase expression correlates with chemosensitivity in human gastric cancer cell lines,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 9, no. 15, pp. 5768–5775, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  43. J. L. Cleveland and M. B. Kastan, “Cancer: a radical approach to treatment,” Nature, vol. 407, no. 6802, pp. 309–311, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. A. Suresh, L. Guedez, J. Moreb, and J. Zucali, “Overexpression of manganese superoxide dismutase promotes survival in cell lines after doxorubicin treatment,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 457–463, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. S. Osbild, L. Brault, E. Battaglia, and D. Bagrel, “Resistance to cisplatin and adriamycin is associated with the inhibition of glutathione efflux in MCF-7-derived cells,” Anticancer Research, vol. 26, no. 5 A, pp. 3595–3600, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  46. T. Mammone, C. Akesson, D. Gan, V. Giampapa, and R. W. Pero, “A water soluble extract from Uncaria tomentosa (cat's claw) is a potent enhancer of DNA repair in primary organ cultures of human skin,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 178–183, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2012 Maria do Carmo Santos Araújo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.