Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine / 2013 / Article
Special Issue

Translational Research in Complementary and Alternative Medicine

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 525613 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/525613

Ramar Perumal Samy, Jayapal Manikandan, Mohammed Al Qahtani, "Evaluation of Aromatic Plants and Compounds Used to Fight Multidrug Resistant Infections", Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2013, Article ID 525613, 17 pages, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/525613

Evaluation of Aromatic Plants and Compounds Used to Fight Multidrug Resistant Infections

Academic Editor: Rong Zeng
Received29 Nov 2012
Revised07 May 2013
Accepted23 May 2013
Published08 Oct 2013


Traditional medicine plays a vital role for primary health care in India, where it is widely practiced to treat various ailments. Among those obtained from the healers, 78 medicinal plants were scientifically evaluated for antibacterial activity. Methanol extract of plants (100 μg of residue) was tested against the multidrug resistant (MDR) Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Forty-seven plants showed strong activity against Burkholderia pseudomallei (strain TES and KHW) and Staphylococcus aureus, of which Tragia involucrata L., Citrus acida Roxb. Hook.f., and Aegle marmelos (L.) Correa ex Roxb. showed powerful inhibition of bacteria. Eighteen plants displayed only a moderate effect, while six plants failed to provide any evidence of inhibition against the tested bacteria. Purified compounds showed higher antimicrobial activity than crude extracts. The compounds showed less toxic effect to the human skin fibroblasts (HEPK) cells than their corresponding aromatic fractions. Phytochemical screening indicates that the presence of various secondary metabolites may be responsible for this activity. Most of the plant extracts contained high levels of phenolic or polyphenolic compounds and exhibited activity against MDR pathogens. In conclusion, plants are promising agents that deserve further exploration. Lead molecules available from such extracts may serve as potential antimicrobial agents for future drug development to combat diseases caused by the MDR bacterial strains as reported in this study.

1. Introduction

Treatment of infections is compromised worldwide by the emergence of bacteria that are resistant to multiple antibiotics [1]. New and emerging drug resistance bacteria strains, particularly methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB), and multidrug resistance (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria, are increasing worldwide and add to the gravity of the situation [2]. S. aureus cause a variety of syndromes such as food poisoning, toxic shock syndrome, skin lesions [3], hyperproliferative skin disease [4], and atopic dermatitis [5, 6]. Community-acquired pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae, Klebsiella pneumonia, and S. aureus accounts for significant mortality in Southeast Asia [7]. Melioidosis has been recognized as an important human infection caused by Burkholderia pseudomallei in Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, and Northern Australia [8, 9]. Cases have also been reported from some other tropical and subtropical regions like Africa and America, and a number of cases in man has recently been reported to increase in China, Taiwan, and South India [10, 11]. Infection with antibiotic resistant bacteria negatively impacts on public health, due to an increased incidence of treatment failure and severity of diseases. Development of resistant bacteria due to the chromosomal mutations is more commonly associated with the horizontal transfer of resistance determinants borne on mobile genetic elements [12]. B. pseudomallei is intrinsically resistant to many antibiotics [13, 14]. Considering the higher cost for producing synthetic drugs and the various side effects associated with their use, the need to search for alternative agents from medicinal plants and essential oils used in folklore medicine is further justified to overcome these issues. In India, there are about 550 tribal communities covered under 227 ethnic groups residing in about 5000 villages throughout different forest and vegetation regions [15]. India is one of the world’s 12 megabiodiversity countries [16, 17]. Plant derived medicines have played a major role in human societies throughout the history and prehistory of mankind [18]. The traditional healers (traditional physicians) or medicinemen have a long history of their own diagnostic and treatment system, which they have acquired from their ancestors [19]. Approximately 80% of the world population still relies on traditional medicine for the treatment of common diseases [2022]. Medicinal plants thus offer significant potential for the development of novel antibacterial therapies and adjunct treatments [23]. Plant derived drugs serve as a prototype to develop more effective and less toxic medicines. In previous studies, few attempts were made to confirm the antimicrobial activity of some indigenous medicinal plants [24, 25]. Not only extracts of various medicinal plants but also essential oils and their constituents have been investigated for their antimicrobial properties against bacteria and fungi [2628].

The principal compounds from the leaves showed a better antibacterial activity against P. aeruginosa and B. subtilis bacteria and a significant antifungal activity on C. albicans [29]. The essential oil from R. officinalis (alpha pinene/verbenone/bornyl acetate) was found to be more sensitive to the Gram-positive bacteria (MIC 2.5–4 mg/mL) than to the Gram-negative bacteria [30]. Several essential oils kill bacteria by damaging the cell membrane structure and inhibiting their membrane function [31]. Because of the antimicrobial potency of plant extracts and oils, they become a rich source of raw materials for many biotechnological and pharmaceutical industries for the development of therapeutic drugs. The increasing trend in the use of aromatic plants and essential oils in food, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical industries suggests that a systematic study of traditional medicinal plants is very important in order to find active compounds from such sources [3234]. The purpose of this study is to survey and investigate popular medicinal aromatic plants and their essential oils with a view to fight against multidrug resistant human pathogens. In the present study, 71 plant species were selected on the basis of the available medicinal information and screened for their in vitro antimicrobial efficacy against bacteria.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethnomedicinal Survey and Collection of Plants

Ethnomedicinal surveys were conducted during March 1998 and July 2001 from various tribal localities (Kolli hills, Kalrayan hills, Pachamalai, Javadi hills, Mundanthurai) of Eastern and Western Ghats, Tamil Nadu, India. For ethnobotanical studies, questioners were used to collect the general information on the tribes, and the key information on medicinal details was collected through interviews. The medicinal plants were identified by a taxonomist using the standard Flora of Tamil Nadu Carnatic [35], and the voucher specimens were deposited in the department’s herbarium at the Entomology Research Institute, Loyola College, Chennai, India.

2.2. Preparation of Plant Extracts

Using a Soxhlet apparatus, the shade-dried and powdered plant materials (200 g of each) were extracted with 1000 mL of methanol (CH3OH) for 10 h. The collected methanol extracts were filtered (Whatman no. 1 filter paper) and evaporated with a rotary evaporator and freeze dryer (lyophilized) to obtain the crude extracts (Buchi, Labortechnik AG, Switzerland). The dried crude extracts were stored at 4°C for antimicrobial assays [34].

2.3. Culture of Microorganisms

The following Gram-negative: Burkholderia pseudomallei (TES21), Burkholderia pseudomallei (KHW22), Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC15380), Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC27853), Vibrio damsela, and Salmonella typhi (ATCC51812) and Gram-positive: Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 29213), Streptococcus pyogenes, and Streptococcus pneumoniae (ATCC49619) microorganisms were used for cultures. B. pseudomallei bacterial strains such as KHW and TES were isolated from the patient samples obtained from the Department of Microbiology, NUS, Singapore. The strains were subcultured on 20 mL Tryptic Soy (TS) and Mueller Hinton (MH) agar plates (pH 7.4) and incubated overnight at 37°C before use.

2.4. Antimicrobial Activity

The standard bacterial cultures were stored at −70°C, subcultured on 20 mL MH and TS agar plates (pH 7.4), and incubated overnight at 37°C prior to use. The antimicrobial property was tested using the disc-diffusion method [36]. Five young colonies of each strain of bacteria taken from their respective cultures grown overnight on TS agar plates (Oxoid limited, Wode Road, Basingstoke, Hants, England, UK) were suspended in 5 mL of sterile saline (0.9%), and the density of the suspension was adjusted to approximately colony forming unit (CFU). The swab was used to inoculate the dried surface of TS agar plate by streaking four times over the surface of the agar and rotating the plate approximately 90°C to ensure an even distribution of the inoculums. The medium was allowed to dry for about 3 min before adding a 6 millimeter in diameter (mm) sterile paper disc (Becton Dickinson, USA) on the surface. Each disc was tapped gently down onto the agar to provide a uniform contact. Lyophilized residue (100 μg/mL) of each plant extracts and purified fractions was weighed and dissolved in 1 mL of water, and 20 μL of the extracts and oils (containing 100 μg of residue) were applied on each disc (3 replicates), while the sterile blank disc served as a normal control. The antimicrobial effect of the extracts on the clinical isolates was determined in comparison with the reference antibiotics (chloramphenicol 30 μg/disc and ceftazidime 30 μg/disc), which were used as positive controls. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h, and the inhibition zones were measured and calculated.

2.5. Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) Assay

MICs were evaluated based on the in vitro screening of 16 purified fractions that were found to have potent antimicrobial activity. Broth dilution method was used for the MIC assay with some slight modifications as recommend by the NCCLS [37]. Two-fold serial dilutions of all the fractionated compounds were made with MH and TS broth in microtiter plate wells to adjust the final concentration from 7.8 to 250 μg/mL, while wells containing the broth alone without any sample served as a control. Three replicates ( ) were used for each dilution and culture containing approximately CFU/mL. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h, and the absorbance was measured at 560 nm.

2.6. Cytotoxicity Assay

The cytotoxic effects of various extracts were tested by MTT assay [38] using human skin fibroblast HEPK cells. The toxic effect of plant extracts and essential oils was assayed on human skin fibroblast (HEPK) cell proliferation in 96-well microtitre plates. Confluent cells ( cells per well) were incubated with extracts and oils for 24 h, and the percentage inhibitory concentration (IC50) was determined.

2.7. Phytochemical Analysis of Plant Extracts

The most active extracts were used for purification of antimicrobial compounds [39]. 100 g each of the plant powder was percolated with 500 mL of 4% aqueous HCl (adjusted to pH 2) and heated at 50°C for 3 h. The extract was washed with  mL of diethyl ether, and the organic phase evaporated to dryness using vacuum rotary evaporator. The dark brown gummy residues obtained by acid hydrolysis were chromatographed on silica gel column  cm (60–120 mesh, pH 7, Merck) by gradually eluting with n-hexane/ethyl acetate (8 : 2; 6 : 4; 3 : 7 and 1 : 1) and chloroform/methanol (3 : 2). The aliquots of each fraction were subjected to thin layer chromatography (TLC) on silica gel coated TLC plate (1 mm Merck) using the solvent system consisting of 20% (v/v) n-hexane/ethyl acetate. The chromatograms were detected using 50% H2SO4 solution as a spray reagent [34]. The individual fractions were collected and concentrated by vacuum rotary evaporator at 40°C. All the purified compounds recovered from the silica gel column were monitored by reading the absorbance at 190–350 nm (UV spectrophotometer, Hitachi, Japan). The active fractions were further purified, and the final yields of the compounds were recorded. The lyophilized pooled concentrated compounds were then assayed (100 μg/mL) against bacteria. The phytochemical screening was done on the pure compounds using the chemical method previously reported for the detection of secondary metabolites [40]. The different chemical constituents tested include alkaloids, flavonoids, glycosides, polyphenols, saponin, sterols, triterpenes, tannins, reducing sugars, gallic acid, catechol, and aglycones.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

The bacterial growth inhibitory activity (inhibition zones millimeter in diameter) was compared for significant differences within the bacterial strains. One way analysis of variance was performed (mean ± SD, replicates) using GraphPad Prism 4, USA. * was considered statistically significant (inhibition zones of extracts/fractions versus antibiotic drugs).

3. Results

3.1. Study Area for the Collection of Aromatic Medicinal Plants

The Western and Eastern Ghats were selected for the present study with the cite map showing the landmarks (Figures 1(a)-1(b)). Kalrayan hills are situated north of Attur taluk (Salem district), one of the major range of hills in the Eastern Ghats of Tamil Nadu (Figure 1(c)). Pachamalai hills are situated to the north of Thuraiyur taluk of Tiruchirappalli district. The rich biodiversity part of Eastern Ghats lies between latitudes 11°09′ 00′′ to 11° 27′ 00′′ N and longitudes 78°28′ 00′′ to 78° 49′ 00′′ E, and occupies an area of about 527.61 square km. It is located near 11° 11′N 78°21E/11.18°N 78.35°E/11.18; 78.35 (Figure 1(d)). Mundanthurai is located nearly 45 km west of Tirunelveli district, TN, between latitude 8° 25′ and 8° 53′ N and longitude 77° 10′ and 77° 35′ E. This is the only area of Western Ghats that has the longest raining period of about 8 months and forms the catchment area for 14 rivers and streams (Figure 1(e)). Kolli Malai is a small mountain range located in Namakkal district. The mountains are about 1000–1300 m in height and cover an area of approximately 280 km. The Kolli hills are part of the Eastern Ghats, which is a mountain range that runs mostly parallel to the east coast of Tamil Nadu in South India (Figure 1(f)). Javadi hills are one of the largest in the Eastern Ghats in Vellore district in the northern part of the state of Tamil Nadu. They consist of bluish gray hills, with peaks averaging 3600–3800 feet or 1100–1150 meter (Figure 1(g)). Based on the vegetation type (Figures 2(a)–2(d)), the study area consists of (i) dry, deciduous, (ii) moist deciduous, and (iii) rain forests and diverse proportion of plant parts in abundance (Figures 2(e)-2(f)). Three different types of tribes (i.e., Kani, Malayali and Paliyan tribes) inhabit in the hill ranges. The Kani tribes, located at Mundanthurai, raise different types of vegetables in their own fields, while the Malayali tribes cultivate rice. They all engage not only in the agricultural work but also are involved in silvicultural work assigned by the forest department, Government of TN, India.

3.2. Medicinal Plants Glory

Western Ghats (Mundanthurai) and Eastern Ghats (Kolli hills, Javadi hills, Kalrayan hills, Pachamalai hills) possess a rich diversity of medicinal plants that are used as food and drug by different groups of tribal communities. Urbanization, habitat degradation, and fragmentation of these forests have resulted in the depletion of natural resources on which these tribes used to depend for their livelihoods. It has become increasingly difficult for them to live in their traditional way. In addition, the impact of modernization and urbanization has encroached in and around tribal settlements, thus changing their lifestyles.

3.3. Plants Valued as Edibles

Various types of plant parts are collected during different seasons, cooked, and eaten along with boiled rice (Table 1). For example, Solanum nigrum leaf is most commonly used in all the four regions. There are a large number of wild edible fruits, including yielding plants such as Citrus acida, Ficus benghalensis, Ficus microcarpa, Ficus racemosa, Phyllanthus emblica, Solanum trilobatum, and Syzygium cumini are popularly used by the tribes.

Scientific name Family Voucher specimenPlant parts Yield (gm)Phytochemical analysis

Adhatoda vasica NeesAcanthaceaeD2020Leaf6.4Vasicine
Aegle marmelos (L.) Correa ex Roxb.RutaceaeD2018Root-bark5.8Alkaloids
Alangium salvifolium (L.) f. Wangerin.Alangiaceae0140Leaf6.3Phenolic
Andrographis paniculata Wallich ex NeesAcanthaceae0061Leaf6.8Andrographolide
Andrographis echioides NeesAcanthaceae0116Leaf7.0Terpenoids,
Acalypha indica L.Euphorbiaceae29644Leaf6.1Acalyphe
Acalypha lanceolata L.Euphorbiaceae15791Leaf7.1Alkaloids
Achyranthes aspera L.Amaranthaceae2666Leaf2.7Betaine
Ageratum conyzoides L.Asteraceae4812Leaf3.7Essential oils
Asteracantha longifolia L.Acanthaceae0234Stem7.4Glycosides
Azadirachta indica A. Juss.MeliaceaeD0204Leaf, bark6.7Tannins
Borassus flabellifer L.ArecaceaeD0202Root0.8Flavonoids, phenolics
Boerhavia erecta L.Nyctaginaceae10897Whole plant2.8Phenolics
Calotropis procera (Ait.) Ait. f.AsclepiadaceaeD073Root-bark1.3Terpenoids
Calotropis gigantea (L.) R.Br.ex Ait AsclepiadaceaeD070Milky latex4.8Alkaloids
Cassia auriculata L.Caesalpiniaceae0141Leaf4.9Saponins
Cassia occidentalis L.Caesalpiniaceae0111Root9.5Flavonoids, saponins
Cassia tora L.Caesalpiniaceae0100Stem, bark6.9Saponins
Cassia fistula L. Caesalpiniaceae037Whole plant7.9Saponins
Cardiospermum halicacabum L.Sapindaceae0125Whole plant5.8Flavonoids
Catharanthus roseus (L.) G.Don.Apocynaceae0029Leaf,
Cinnamomum zeylanicum Garcin ex Blume Lauraceae00209Bark3.1Essential oil, Tannin
Cinnamomum iners Reinw. ex BlumeLauraceae043-cLeaf, barkAlkaloids
Cissus quadrangularis Roxb.VitaceaeD02023Leaf6.8Glycosides
Citrus acida Roxb. Hook.f.Rutaceae0213Leaf5.2Saponins, Terpenoids
Centella asiatica (L.)Umbelliferae0138Whole plant8.9Flavonoids, Alkaloids
Clerodendrum inerme (L.) Gaertn.VerbenaceaeD02043Stem7.8Sterols, diterpenes
Clitoria ternatea L.PapilionaceaeD02026Seed9.8Protein
Cleistanthus collinus (Roxb.) Benth. and Hook.f.Euphorbiaceae0011Whole plant0.03Cleistanthin, collinusin
Cleome gynandropsis L. Capparidaceae12247Leaf6.2Glycosides
Cleome viscose L.Capparidaceae29999Leaf2.7Phenolics
Coccinia grandis W & ACucurbitaceaeD02030Leaf, root0.9Glycosides
Cymbopogon citratus (DC.)GramineaeD012Root0.25Essential oil
Datura metel L.SolanaceaeD02038Leaf, stem3.9Steroids
Eucalyptus globulus Labill.MyrtaceaeD0220Leaf1.2Terpenoids
Eclipta alba (L.) HasskAsteraceaeD028Whole plant0.7Phenolic
Euphorbia hirta LinnEuphorbiaceae0018-cWhole plant0.12
Eclipta prostrata (L.)AsteraceaeD210Leaf1.10Triterpenoid, saponin
Eugenia caryophyllus (Sprengel) Bullock & HarrisonMyrtaceae0025Flower buds1.16Essential oils
Elettaria cardamomum White et Mason Zingiberaceae0009Fruit pods3.17Essential oils
Gloriosa superba L.Liliaceae 020-STuber1.08Alkaloids, phenol
Jatropha curcas L.Euphorbiaceae015Whole plant5.3Alkaloids, flavonoids
Hyptis suaveolens (L.) Poit.Lamiaceae24688Leaf6.3Essential oil
Hemidesmus indicus L.AsclepiadaceaeD-009RootsCoumarins
Ichnocarpus  frutescens (L.) R.Br.Apocynaceae0110Root, flower7.3Terpenoids
Leucas aspera (Willd.) LinkLabiatae0114Leaf8.3Triterpenes
Lawsonia inermis L.LythraceaeT261Leaf0.9Glycosides, phenolic
Madhuca longifolia (L.) JF MacbrSapotaceaeD01415Nut9.3Sitosterol
Merremia hastate L. (Desr.) Hallier.f.Convolvulaceae10894Whole plant4.0Alkaloids
Mentha piperita L.Lamiaceae0217-cWhole plant0.7Essential oils
Morinda tinctoria RoxbRubiaceae0122Leaf1.4Glycosides
Mimosa pudica L.Mimosaceae0071Whole plant0.6
Oldenlandia umbellata L.RubiaceaeD02047Leaf4.4Alkaloids
Ocimum sanctum L.Lamiaceae0016Whole plant3.0Alkaloids
Piper attenuatum Buch. Hamex Miq.Piperaceae007Flower4.6Alkaloids
Plumbago zeylanica (L.) CavPlumbaginaceae0121Root4.8Plumbagin
Plectranthus amboinicus (L.) Spreng. Lamiaceae0410Whole plant1.2Essential oils, terpenoids
Phyllanthus debilis L. (Klein ex Willd)Euphorbiaceae0120Whole plant4.9Polyphenol
Phyllanthus madraspatensis L.Euphorbiaceae0117Whole plant5.0Polyphenol
Premna tomentosa Willd.Verbenaceae0129Leaf5.3Diterpenes
Rosmarinus officinalis L. Lamiaceae0017Root0.23Essential oils
Rauwolfia serpentine L.Apocynaceae020-SRoot1.15Alkaloid
Sebastiania chamaelea (L.) Muell Arg.Euphorbiaceae0034Leaf1.1Polyphenol
Solanum trilobatum L.SolanaceaeD02054Leaf, flower4.0Tannins
Sphaeranthus indicus L.AsteraceaeD02060Whole plant1.0Essential oil
Swertia chirata (L.) Ham.GentianaceaeD0540Whole plant 1.6Glycodises
Strychnos nux-vomica L.LoganiaceaeS-22Nuts0.36Alkaloids
Tragia involucrata L. EuphorbiaceaeD068Leaves1.6Shellsol
Tinospora cordifolia (Willd.) Miers ex Hoof.f & ThomsMenispermaceae0118Leaf,
root, stem
5.0Glycosides, tannins
Tridax procumbens L.Compositae 10649Leaf1.8Flavonoids
Terminalia arjuna (DC) W & ACombretaceae033-cBark8.0Phenolics
Tephrosia purpurea (L.) PersFabaceaeS-43Whole plant0.8Isoflavone
Vitex negundo L.Verbenaceae0031Leaf2.4Terpineol
Vetiveria zizanioides L.Gramineae0051Root1.03Essential oil
Withania somnifera (L.) DunalSolanaceaeD02063Root2.1Alkaloids
Wedelia calendulacea LessAsteraceaeS-24LeavesFlavonoids
Zingiber officinale Rosc.Zingiberaceae0327Rhizome2.3Tannins
Zanthoxylum limonella (Dennst.) AlstonRutaceae009Bark1.9Alkaloids, essential oil

Class of chemical compounds: A: alkaloids, S: saponins, T: tannins, St: steroids, G: glycosides, T: terpenoids, P: polyphenol, P: phenolics, Sh: shellsol, H: hydrocarbon esters.

3.4. Plants Used for Snakebite Treatment

Thirty-four plants used for snakebite treatment are documented (Table 1). Snakebite is a major health hazard that leads to high mortality in tribal settlements. The majority of the antidotes are prepared freshly from plant materials frequently collected from the leaves of A. paniculata, A. echioides, Aristolochia indica, E. alba, E. prostrata, M. pudica, O. sanctum, T. involucrata, and Cleistanthus collinus (Oduvanthalai); the whole plants of Achyranthes aspera and Wedelia calendulacea; the stem-barks and nuts of Strychnos nux-vomica; the roots of Hemidesmus indicus, Tephrosia purpurea, Rauwolfia serpentina, C. roseus, and so forth, and the tubers of Gloriosa superba. The tuber paste is usually applied externally on the site of snakebite, and decoction is given orally for treatment by indigenous people. Besides, these tribes rely on the medicinal plants as ingredients for fabricating a kind of medicated stone for health management. “Vishakallu” (poison stone) is used by the indigenous groups called Kani in Kerala, India, to treat a snakebite. When the stone is placed directly on the bitten area, it sticks to the body to absorb the poison and then become detached when absorption seems to be complete. The ingredients of Vishakallu stones are made with leaves of Ocimum sanctum, Anisomeles malabarica, Leucas aspera, Piper betle, Santalum album, and the pebbles collected from the river bank.

3.5. Survey of Medicinal Plants and Their Health Care Values

The present study is an attempt to provide scientific basis and obtain justification for the traditional beliefs of reliance on a rich diversity of ethnomedicinal plants, along with the rich heritage of traditional medicine practices related to health care system made available by the primitive tribal communities located at different settlements. The native traditional practitioners called “vaidyars” have a good knowledge about the traditional plants locally available for treatment of various diseases (Figures 3(a)–3(p)). Such traditional medical knowledge is used for preparing home remedies, ill health prevention, and routine health maintenance. This knowledge is also applicable to cover other sectors of social life. During the ethnobotanical survey, the wealth of 78 medicinal plant species used by the indigenous tribal community for various types of health treatment was documented. The botanical names, family names, parts used, chemical constituents, and their application are provided (Table 1).

3.6. Antimicrobial Activity of Crude Extracts

In this study, we reported the antimicrobial screening of methanolic crude extracts of 78 medicinal plants (Table 2). Results revealed that 68 plant extracts displayed potent activities against one or more Gram-positive and -negative bacteria. Of which, Tragia involucrata, Citrus acida, Aegle marmelos, Adhatoda vasica, Calotropis procera, Andrographis paniculata and Mentha piperita, Azadirachta indica, Sphaeranthus indicus, and Elettaria cardamomum showed the highest antibacterial activity against the multidrug resistant B. pseudomallei (KHW and TES) and S. aureus at 100 μg/mL concentration. The extracts showed pronounced antibacterial activity with their inhibitory zones ranging from 20 to 31 mm in diameter as compared to the standard drugs chloramphenicol and ceftazidime (29–33 mm). The majority of the plants demonstrated a powerful antimicrobial potency against the multidrug resistant strains of B. pseudomallei (KHW and TES), K. pneumonia, and S. aureus. Approximately, twenty-one plant extracts exerted only a weak or moderate effect against the tested bacteria, while the crude extract of 13 plants failed to show any effect at all. Except for the plant extracts of T. involucrata, A. lanceolata, A. vasica, and S. indicus extracts, the majority of the plant extracts were ineffective against the V. damsela infection, fascinatingly, only 11 plants exhibited activity against P. aeruginosa, of which S. indicus, M. piperita, and C. procera were found to have very strong inhibition of bacteria at the tested concentrations. Interestingly, sixteen plants such as Andrographis echioides, C. auriculata, C. viscose, C. gigantea, T. arjuna, Oldenlandia umbellata, Boerhavia erecta, and E. hirta exerted a strong activity against the Gram-positive S. aureus bacteria.

Scientific name Microorganisms; growth inhibition zones (6 millimeter in diameters)

Adhatoda vasica Nees2819221812101716
Aegle marmelos (L.) Correa ex Roxb.291791015
Alangium salvifolium (L.) f. Wangerin.15108812910
Andrographis echioides L.1291789
Andrographis paniculata Wallich ex Nees262119132581612
Acalypha indica L.18
Acalypha lanceolata L.12131021
Achyranthes aspera L.714151211
Ageratum conyzoides L.108
Asteracantha longifolia L.161215
Azadirachta indica A. Juss.1517211614231214
Borassus flabellifer L.910178910
Boerhavia erecta L.89716
Calotropis procera (L.)1518289
Calotropis gigantea (L.) R.Br.ex Ait1192098
Cardiospermum halicacabum L.2314919
Catharanthus roseus (L.) G.Don.13712915118
Cassia auriculata L.1713121913
Cassia occidentalis L.18
Cassia tora L.
Cassia fistula L.
Citrus acida Roxb. Hook.f.262212299138
Cissus quadrangularis L.
Cinnamomum zeylanicum Garcin ex Blume 141672022197
Cinnamomum iners Reinw. ex Blume2016151612
Rosmarinus officinalis L. 91078
Centella asiatica (L.)9811
Clerodendrum inerme (L.) Gaertn. 1371215118
Clitoria ternatea L.
Clitoria ternatea L.161213810
Cleome gynandropsis L.12191191512
Cleome viscose L.8101420
Coccinia grandis W & A910178910
Cymbopogon citratus (DC.)16181714
Datura metel L.
Eclipta alba (L.) Hassk20910
Euphorbia hirta Linn1116
Eucalyptus globulus Labill.77
Eugenia caryophyllus Bullock & Harrison71198
Elettaria cardamomum White et Mason2120714221217
Hyptis suaveolens (L.) Poit.81087
Ichnocarpus  frutescens (L.) W.J. Aiton
Jatropha curcas L.811127
Leucas aspera (Willd.) Link91017812910
Lawsonia inermis L.
Madhuca longifolia (L.) JF Macbr1816141912879
Merremia hastate L. (Desr.) Hallier.f.
Morinda tinctoria Roxb
Mentha piperita L. 23172612202519
Ocimum sanctum L. 1291171578
Oldenlandia umbellata L. 17
Piper attenuatum Buch. Hamex Miq.137122117118
Plumbago zeylanica (L.) Cav 91017812910
Plectranthus amboinicus (L.) Spreng.81115
Phyllanthus debilis L. (Klein ex Willd)7899187
Phyllanthus maderaspatensis L.17
Premna tomentosa Willd.131015910
Gloriosa superba L.171678158
Sebastiania chamaelea (L.) Muell Arg.19121713198
Solanum trilobatum L.1398
Sphaeranthus indicus L.20182172211916
Swertia chirata (L.) Ham.
Terminalia arjuna (W. & A)16
Tinospora cordifolia (Willd.) Miers ex Hoof.f & Thoms23161215
Tridax procumbens L.98714
Tragia involucrata L.25232031282219
Vitex negundo L.14
Vetiveria zizanioides (L.)11977168
Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal12201512
Zingiber officinale Rosc.14117157127
Zanthoxylum limonella (Dennst.) Alston137129118
Chloramphenicol (30 µg/disc)21121517291615181311
Ceftazidime (30 µg/disc)33162219162521201215

*Bacteria (+/−). Results obtained in the disc diffusion assay; antibacterial activity is expressed as the mean ± SD ( ), of the inhibition by the extract and its diameter around the discs. One way analysis of variance was performed (mean ± SD, replicates). Size of inhibition zones were including the sterile blank discs 6 millimeter (mm) in diameters. Absence of bacterial inhibition indicates (—), antibiotic disc (30 µg/disc).
3.7. Phytochemical Screening of Plants

The results obtained from the phytochemical screening as shown in Table 1 indicate the presence of various types of secondary metabolites such as polyphenols, tannins, saponins, alkaloids, and glycosides/polysaccharides. Most of the plant extracts relatively rich in alkaloids, phenols, flavonoids, polyphenols, tannins, sterols, and terpenoids were found to inhibit the growth of organisms.

3.8. Antimicrobial Activity of Fractioned Compounds

Active components were purified from the most active extracts for further testing. The compound shellsol of T. involucrata and C. acida exhibited the most potent action against the antibiotic resistant strains of B. pseudomallei (KHW), S. aureus, B. pseudomallei (TES), and K. pneumoniae. A. marmelos was also found to inhibit the growth of B. pseudomallei (KHW) more effectively than other tested bacteria. A. vasica showed the broad spectrum growth inhibitory activity on B. pseudomallei (KHW), K. pneumoniae, K. pneumoniae, resistant B. pseudomallei (TES), S. pyogenes, and V. damsela. However, E. cardamomum displayed antimicrobial activity on some of the B. pseudomallei (KHW), S. pyogenes, B. pseudomallei (TES), and S. typhi strains. Similarly, A. indica exerted the growth inhibition on K. pneumoniae and S. aureus. Remarkably, Sebastiania chamaelea was more active against K. pneumoniae, K. pneumoniae, and S. pyogenes. The compound from S. indicus inhibited the growth of K. pneumoniae, K. pneumoniae, B. pseudomallei (KHW and TES), and S. typhi strains, as compared to the activity shown by the crude extracts (Figure 4). The antimicrobial efficacy of fractions collected from the oil yielding plants was also compared with that of the tested compounds. C. zeylanicum and R. officinalis were the most sensitive in controlling the growth of B. pseudomallei (KHW), S. aureus, K. pneumonia, and S. pneumoniae. Fascinatingly, all the compounds obtained from aromatic plants, except those from E. globules, were found to be very effective against the multidrug resistant human pathogen B. pseudomallei (KHW) that causes melioidosis. On the other hand, compounds from C citrates, O. sanctum, E. caryophyllus, and Z. zizanioide, showed some promising effect only against S. aureus (Figure 5). The activity of the compounds were pronounced more than that of the oil yielding plant fractions.

3.9. Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs)

The antibiotic potential of the purified fractions was obtained from the MIC determination. The hydrocarbon ester shellsol (T. involucrata) and C. acida showed an interesting inhibitory potential against S. aureus (MIC of 7.8 μg/mL) and B. pseudomallei strain of KHW (MIC of 15.6 μg/mL). A. vasica showed an MIC of 15.6 μg/mL against B. pseudomallei (KHW) and an MIC of 31.25 μg/mL against K. pneumoniae, K. pneumoniae, S. pyogenes, and V. damsela strains. Fractions from A. marmelos and terpenoid from A. indica exerted bacteriostatic effect with MIC values of 31.25 μg/mL on some selected bacteria including B. pseudomallei of KHW, S. aureus, and B. pseudomallei of TES. The MIC of 31.25 μg/mL was found for E. cardamomum against S. aureus, K. pneumonia, and S. pyogenes. S. indicus displayed a very strong inhibition against MDR K. pneumoniae (MIC of 15.6 μg/mL), and against B. pseudomallei (KHW and TES) at MIC of 31.25 μg/mL. When the antimicrobial efficacies of purified fractions from aromatic plants were compared, the C. zeylanicum fraction displayed an important antimicrobial effect against S. aureus (MIC of 7.8 μg/mL), MDR B. pseudomallei of KHW (MIC of 15.6 μg/mL), and S. pneumoniae (MIC of 31.25 μg/mL). The essential oil from M. piperatea showed MIC value of 31.25 μg/mL against K. pneumoniae, S. aureus, and B. pseudomallei (KHW), respectively. O. sanctum and C. citratus fractions also showed antimicrobial activity (MICs of 31.25–125 μg/mL) only at higher concentrations against the tested bacteria. In addition to that, higher concentrations (>250 μg/mL) (of Vetiveria fractions) were required to inhibit Vibro species, and others (including E. globulus fractions) failed to show any effect at tested concentrations (7.8–125 μg/mL). However, the purified fractions (from most active medicinal plants) showed strong bacteriostatic inhibition against the tested organisms (Table 3).

Botanical nameFamilyParts usedGram-positive and -negative bacteria (MICs µg/mL)

A. indica Juss. MeliaceaeSeed (fraction)31.2562.5125<25031.25
A. marmelos (L.) RutaceaeRoot-bark (F)31.2531.2531.2562.5125250
A. paniculata NeesAcanthaceaeLeaf (fraction)25012562.5125
A. vasica NeesAcanthaceaeFraction (Stem)15.631.2531.2562.5<25031.2531.25
C. acida Roxb. RutaceaeLeaf (fraction)15.662.57.831.25
E. cardamomum White et Mason AcanthaceaeFraction (WP)62.531.2531.2525062.5
S. indicus (L.)EuphorbiaceaeWhole plant (F)31.2512515.662.5<250
T. involucrata (L.)EuphorbiaceaeShellosol (leaf)15.631.257.862.5
Cinnamomum zeylanicum (L.)LauraceaeBark (fraction)15.662.57.831.25125
Cymbopogon citratus (L.)GraminaeLeaf (fraction)250<25062.562.5125
Eugenia caryophyllus (L.)MyrtaceaeFlower buds (F)62.512562.5
Eucalyptus globulus (L.)MyrtaceaeFraction (leaf)<250<250
Mentha piperita (L.)LabiataeFraction (WP)62.531.2531.25<250
Ocimum sanctum (L.)LabiataeLeaf (fraction)62.512531.2562.5125<250
Rosmarinus officinalis (L.)LabiataeRosemary oil31.2531.25
Vetiveria zizanioides (L.)GraminaeRoot (fraction)125125>250>250

The bacterial growth inhibitory activity was compared for significant differences within the bacterial strains by broth-dilution method at 250, 125, 62.5, 31.25, 15.6, and 7.8 µg/mL. F: fractions.

3.10. Cytotoxic Effects of Plants

When the components were assayed for cytotoxicity against the normal human skin fibroblasts (HEPK) cells, the compounds obtained from E. cardamomum, T. involucrata, S. indicus, C. acida, A. vasica, A. marmelos, A. indica, and A. paniculata did not show toxicity up to 1000 μg/mL (see Figures S1 and S2 in Supplementary Material available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/525613). A slight reduction of cell proliferation was noted only at higher doses (2000 μg/mL). In contrast, cell proliferation was markedly reduced after exposure of HEPK cells to O. sanctum, E. globulus, V. zizanioides, C. citratus, and E. globulus compounds. There was no gradual reduction in skin cell proliferation seen after exposure to C. zeylanicum, R. officinalis, and M. piperita (see Figures S3 and S4) compounds. The toxicity was found to be concentration-dependent when the skin fibroblasts (HEPK) cells were exposed to various compounds. The cell proliferation was increased by the influence of the plant components at the lower concentrations. Whereas the oil yielding plant compounds showed inhibition of cell proliferation and toxicity at higher doses 250–1000 μg/mL.

4. Discussion

The Western Ghats is considered as one of the richest biodiversity hotspots in the world [41]. In this survey, we collected nearly 78 medicinal plants from Western and Eastern Ghats that are edible and popularly used for curing various ailments including snakebite. Traditional remedies have a long-standing history in many tribal settlements in TN, India, and they continue to provide useful and applicable tools for treating ailments [42]. The ingredients that make up the “Vishakallu” stone, which is used as an antidote for snakebite, are different herbs and pebbles available from the river banks. Likewise, aqueous paste and decoction obtained from the leaves of A. paniculata are widely used for snakebite treatment by indigenous people [43]. Previous studies have reported that ethnomedicine plays major roles in conserving the disappearing knowledge of tribal communities [4447]. The traditional beliefs of reliance on a rich diversity of ethnomedicinal plants located at different settlements have also been confirmed in another study [48, 49]. Herein, we explored the various types of traditional practices reported by the primitive tribal communities with a view to gain further knowledge from such studies.

In the present investigation, potentially rich sources of tribal medicine (71 plants) were scientifically evaluated for their antibacterial activity against the MDR bacteria, and the accumulated data was disseminated for the first time to the scientific community. Out of the 71 medicinal plants screened for the antibacterial activity, 10 of them (T. involucrata, C. acida, A. marmelos, A. vasica, C. procera, A. paniculata and M. piperita, A. indica, S. indicus, and E. cardamomum) displayed the highest antibacterial activity against the multidrug resistant B. pseudomallei (KHW and TES) and S. aureus strains. The antibacterial activity of those crude plant extracts was as equally effective as that of the standard drugs. Our findings corroborated with the previous reports made on the antistaphylococcal activity of tribal medicinal plants [34, 50, 51]. On the other hand, isolated components from the most active extracts of T. involucrata, shellsol, and C. acida exhibited the most potent action against the antibiotic resistant B. pseudomallei (KHW), K. pneumoniae, and S. aureus strains. These results further confirmed our previous findings on the leaves of T. involucrata and its compounds hydrocarbon ester-like shellsol, which displayed a high antibacterial effect against the different bacterial strains, especially that of S. aureus [34]. Eugenol and caryophyllene are the active agents contained in the M. piperita [52] and O. sanctum plants, which are believed to be mainly responsible for the antimicrobial properties of these plants [53]. Interestingly, the compounds obtained from the aromatic plants such as C. zeylanicum and R. officinalis were also found to be very effective against the multidrug resistant human pathogen K. pneumoniae, S. aureus, S. typhi, and B. pseudomallei (KHW) that causes melioidosis.

The inhibitory potential determined for the shellsol (T. involucrata), vaseline (A. vasica), C. acida, and C. zeylanicum indicates that the MIC of 7.8–31.25 μg/mL found against the B. pseudomallei of KHW, K. pneumoniae, K. pneumoniae, S. pyogenes, and V. damsel, and S. pneumoniae was quite low. Similarly, lower MIC values were found for M. piperita (MIC of 1.13–2.25 mg/mL) against the above bacterial strains [52]. MIC was found for the most active alcohol extracts of A. salvifolium (MIC 0.034–0.263 mg/mL) on S. aureus [54], and the MIC for S. trilobatum aqueous extracts determined against the tested organisms ranged from 0.06 to 0.5 mg/mL [55]. C. zeylanicum was found to have an effective antibacterial activity (MIC 64 μg/mL) against P. aeruginosa, E. coli, B. subtilis, and S. aureus [56]. Previously, several investigators have demonstrated that active agents exert interesting activity against bacteria even at lower concentrations tested [57, 58]. The bacteriostatic mechanism involves damage to the cell walls of bacteria, followed by inhibition of protein synthesis that ultimately leads to bacterial death [59]. The most active plants are widely used by various tribes as traditional treatment (i.e., cut wounds, skin infection, and scabies), thus indicating the potential for further development into promising drugs. In order to ascertain the safety and efficacy of the most active compounds, their effect on human skin fibroblast cells was evaluated. Chemical constituents of E. cardamomum, T. involucrata, S. indicus, C. acida, A. vasica, A. marmelos, A. indica, and A. paniculata plants failed to produce any noticeable toxicity up to 1000 μg/mL. Although some of the tested compounds exhibited a slight reduction of cell proliferation and some minor morphological changes, such changes were insignificant at lower doses and became evident only at higher doses. However, certain aromatic compounds of O. sanctum, E. globulus, V. zizanioides, C. citratus, and E. globulus plants showed reduction of cell proliferation against HEPK cells.

Our phytochemical screening also provides evidence of the presence of several types of compounds that are mainly responsible for the remarkable antibacterial effect of these plants. The differences noted for the bactericidal activity of various plant extracts in this study appears to be directly related to the diversity of compounds (shown in parentheses) that are accumulated in the following plants (e.g., A. marmelos and O. umbellate) [6062]. Compounds like tannins, phenol, and polyphenols can bind the Gram-negative bacteria to form a heavy soluble complex on the cell surface, which subsequently disturbs the availability of receptor on cells and kills the bacteria [63]. Several species having wide spectra of antimicrobial activity mainly due to the active constituents such as essential oil, phenolic compounds like thymol, carvacrol in oregano and thyme, eugenol in clove, and cinnamon were also identified previously [64, 65]. Essential oils degrade the cell wall, interact with the cell components, and then disrupt the cytoplasmic membrane [66]. The antimicrobial effect of phenolic compounds may involve multiple modes of action, including damage to the membrane protein, interference with membrane integrated enzymes [67], causing leakage of cellular components, coagulation of cytoplasm, depletion of the proton motive force, alteration of fatty acid and phospholipid constituents, impairment of enzymatic mechanisms for production and metabolism, alteration of nutrient uptake and electron transport [68], influencing the synthesis of DNA and RNA, and destroying protein translation and the function of the mitochondrion in eukaryotes [69]. The mode of action of antimicrobial agents depends on the type of microorganism and is mainly related to their cell wall structure and the outer membrane arrangement. Most of the plant spices and herbs contain complex phenolics (i.e., phenolic acids, flavonoids, tannins, lignans, coumarins, quinines). In addition, the mechanisms of action of each phenolic compound against various bacteria are also very complicated [26, 70]. Further investigation is therefore required to understand the relationship between the antimicrobial action and the chemical structure of every phenolic compound in the tested extracts. The information available from previous pharmacological sources combined with the findings herein reported on the medicinal plant extracts may serve as essential data for future drug development to combat diseases caused by the MDR bacterial strains.


MDR: Multidrug resistant bacteria
TES: Strain of Burkholderia pseudomallei
MRSA: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
VRE: Vancomycin-resistant enterococci
MTB:Mycobacterium tuberculosis
CH3OH: Methanol
CFU: Colony forming unit
HCl: Hydrochloric acid
TLC: Thin layer chromatography
H2SO4: Sulphuric acids
UV: Ultraviolet spectrophotometer
HEPK: Human skin fibroblasts.


The authors are thankful to the ERI, Loyola College, Chennai, India, for his support during the survey. The authors also thank the Department of Microbiology, NUHS, NUS for the bacterial cultures used in this investigation. The authors are thankful to the tribal people for sharing their healing knowledge on medicinal aromatic plants.

Supplementary Materials

Evaluating herbal drugs in vitro could be a valuable tool for screening antibiotic potential of plants. To develop new strategy for improvement for the assessment of their pharmacological, toxicological profile, scientific evidence based approaches are being employed to appropriately evaluate composition, quality, potential medicinal activity and safety of these natural products.

  1. Supplementary Material


  1. M. N. Alekshun and S. B. Levy, “Molecular mechanisms of antibacterial multidrug resistance,” Cell, vol. 128, no. 6, pp. 1037–1050, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. A. D. Russell, “Antibiotic and biocide resistance in bacteria: introduction,” Symposium Series Society for Applied Microbiology, vol. 31, no. 92, pp. 1S–3S, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  3. D. R. Guay, “Treatment of bacterial skin and skin structure infections,” Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 1259–1275, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. A. J. Brosnahan and P. M. Schlievert, “Gram-positive bacterial superantigen outside-in signaling causes toxic shock syndrome,” FEBS Journal, vol. 278, no. 23, pp. 4649–4667, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. K. Fellermann, J. Wehkamp, K. R. Herrlinger, and E. F. Stange, “Crohn's disease: a defensin deficiency syndrome?” European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 627–634, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. L. Chen, S. Lin, R. Agha-Majzoub, L. Overbergh, C. Mathieu, and L. S. Chan, “CCL27 is a critical factor for the development of atopic dermatitis in the keratin-14 IL-4 transgenic mouse model,” International Immunology, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1233–1242, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. J. H. Song, V. Thamlikitkul, and P. R. Hsueh, “Clinical and economic burden of community-acquired pneumonia amongst adults in the Asia-Pacific region,” International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 108–117, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. D. A. B. Dance, “Melioidosis,” Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 127–132, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  9. N. J. White, “Melioidosis,” The Lancet, vol. 361, no. 9370, pp. 1715–1722, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. S. Yang, “Melioidosis research in China,” Acta Tropica, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 157–165, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. P. R. Hsueh, L. J. Teng, L. N. Lee et al., “Melioidosis: an emerging infection in Taiwan?” Emerging Infectious Diseases, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 428–433, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  12. C. Walsh and S. Fanning, “Antimicrobial resistance in food-borne pathogens—a cause for concern?” Current Drug Targets, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 808–815, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. Vorachit, P. Chongtrakool, S. Arkomsean, and S. Boonsong, “Antimicrobial resistance in Burkholderia pseudomallei,” Acta Tropica, vol. 74, no. 2-3, pp. 139–144, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. F. M. Thibault, E. Hernandez, D. R. Vidal, M. Girardet, and J. D. Cavallo, “Antibiotic susceptibility of 65 isolates of Burkholderia pseudomallei and Burkholderia mallei to 35 antimicrobial agents,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1134–1138, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. R. L. S. Sikarwar, “Ethnogynaecological uses of plants new to India,” Ethnobotany, vol. 12, no. 1-2, pp. 112–115, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  16. R. Siva, “Status of natural dyes and dye-yielding plants in India,” Current Science, vol. 92, no. 7, pp. 916–925, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  17. P. Kumar Singh, V. Kumar, R. K. Tiwari, A. Sharma, Ch. V. Rao, and R. H. Singh, “Medico-ethnobotany of ‘chatara’ block of district sonebhadra, Uttar Pradesh, India,” Advances in Biological Research, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 65–80, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  18. W. H. Lewis and M. P. Elwin-Lewis, Medical Botany: Plants Affecting Human Health, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2003.
  19. R. Perumal Samy, P. N. Pushparaj, and P. Gopalakrishnakone, “A compilation of bioactive compounds from Ayurveda,” Bioinformation, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 100–110, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  20. World Health Organization (WHO), Traditional Medicine Strategy 2002–2005, Genera: World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2002.
  21. P. S. Haddad, G. A. Azar, S. Groom, and M. Boivin, “Natural health products, modulation of immune function and prevention of chronic diseases,” Evidence Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 513–520, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. K. Poonam and G. S. Singh, “Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by the Taungya community in Terai Arc Landscape, India,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 167–176, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. G. B. Mahady, “Medicinal plants for the prevention and treatment of bacterial infections,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 11, no. 19, pp. 2405–2427, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. V. P. Kumar, N. S. Chauhan, H. Padh, and M. Rajani, “Search for antibacterial and antifungal agents from selected Indian medicinal plants,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 182–188, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. R. Nair, T. Kalariya, and S. Chanda, “Antibacterial activity of some plant extracts used in folk medicine,” Journal of Herbal Pharmacotherapy, vol. 7, no. 3-4, pp. 191–201, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. D. Kalemba and A. Kunicka, “Antibacterial and antifungal properties of essential oils,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 813–829, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. A. H. Ashour, “Antibacterial, antifungal, and anticancer activities of volatile oils and extracts from stems, leaves, and flowers of Eucalyptus sideroxylon and Eucalyptus torquata,” Cancer Biology and Therapy, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 399–403, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  28. M. J. Abad, L. M. Bedoya, L. Apaza, and P. Bermejo, “The Artemisia L. genus: a review of bioactive essential oils,” Molecules, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 2542–2566, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. H. N. Marzoug, M. Romdhane, A. Lebrihi et al., “Eucalyptus oleosa essential oils: chemical composition and antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of the oils from different plant parts (stems, leaves, flowers and fruits),” Molecules, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 1695–1709, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. C. Proestos, D. Sereli, and M. Komaitis, “Determination of phenolic compounds in aromatic plants by RP-HPLC and GC-MS,” Food Chemistry, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 44–52, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. S. Chao, G. Young, C. Oberg, and K. Nakaoka, “Inhibition of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) by essential oils,” Flavour and Fragrance Journal, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 444–449, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. M. Akin, D. Oguz, and H. T. Saracoglu, “Antibacterial effects of some plant extracts from Labiatae (Lamiaceae) growing naturally around Sirnak-Silopi, Turkey,” International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Applied Sciences, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 4–47, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  33. K. Bayoub, T. Baibai, D. Mountassif, A. Retmane, and A. Soukri, “Antibacterial activities of the crude ethanol extracts of medicinal plants against Listeria monocytogenes and some other pathogenic strains,” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 9, no. 27, pp. 4251–4258, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  34. R. P. Samy, P. Gopalakrishnakone, M. Sarumathi, P. Houghton, and S. Ignacimuthu, “Purification of antibacterial agents from Tragia involucrata—a popular tribal medicine for wound healing,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 99–106, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. K. M. Matthew, The Flora of Tamil Nadu Carnatic, Part I–III printed at the Diocesan Press, Madras, India, 1981–1983.
  36. A. W. Bauer, W. M. Kirby, J. C. Sherris, and M. Turck, “Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method,” American Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 493–496, 1966. View at: Google Scholar
  37. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Performance Standards For Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 12th Informational Supplement, Approved standard M100-S12, National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa, USA, 2002.
  38. E. A. Elsinghorst, “Measurement of invasion by gentamicin resistance,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 236, pp. 405–420, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. J. B. Harborne, Phytochemical Methods, Chapman and Hall, New York, NY, USA, 1976.
  40. H. Wagner, S. Bladt, and E. M. Zgairski, Plant Drug Analysis, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1984.
  41. N. Myers, R. A. Mittermeler, C. G. Mittermeler, G. A. B. da Fonseca, and J. Kent, “Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities,” Nature, vol. 403, no. 6772, pp. 853–858, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. R. Perumal Samy and S. Ignacimuthu, “Antibacterial activity of some folklore medicinal plants used by tribals in Western Ghats of India,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 63–71, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. K. Nampoothiri, A. Chrispal, A. Begum, S. Jasmine, K. G. Gopinath, and A. Zachariah, “A clinical study of renal tubular dysfunction in Cleistanthus collinus (Oduvanthalai) poisoning,” Clinical Toxicology, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 193–197, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. M. Strathern, Useful Knowledge, The Isiah Berlin Lecture. University of Manchester, Brunswick, UK.
  45. C. N. Sunil and A. K. Pradeep, “(2001) Another new species of Tripogon (Poaceae) from India,” Sida, vol. 19, pp. 803–806, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  46. S. Biber-Klemm and T. Cottier, Right To Plant Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge: Basic Issues and Prospective, Oxfordshire, Nosworthy Way, UK, 2006.
  47. V. S. Ramachandran, S. Shijo Joseph, and R. Aruna, “Ethnobotanical studies from amaravathy range of Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary, Western Ghats, Coimbatore District, Southern India,” Ethnobotanical Leaflets, vol. 13, pp. 1069–1087, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  48. A. H. Rajasab and I. Mohamad, “Documentation of folk knowledge on edible wild plants of North Karnataka,” Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 419–429, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  49. M. Rajadurai, V. G. Vidhya, M. Ramya, and A. Bhaskar, “Ethno-medicinal plants used by the traditional healers of pachamalai hills, Tamilnadu, India,” Studies on Ethno-Medicine, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 39–41, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  50. S. K. Adesina, O. Idowu, A. O. Ogundaini et al., “Antimicrobial constituents of the leaves of Acalypha wilkesiana and Acalypha hispida,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 371–374, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  51. M. T. Gutierrez-Lugo, M. P. Singh, W. M. Maiese, and B. N. Timmermann, “New antimicrobial cycloartane triterpenes from Acalypha communis,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 872–875, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. A. K. Tyagi and A. Malik, “Antimicrobial potential and chemical composition of Mentha piperita oil in liquid and vapour phase against food spoiling microorganisms,” Food Control, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 1707–1714, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. G. Devendran and U. Balasubramanian, “Qualitative phytochemical screening and GC-MS analysis of Ocimum sanctum L. leaves,” Asian Journal of Plant Science and Research, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 44–48, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  54. V. C. Jain, N. M. Patel, D. P. Shah, P. K. Patel, and B. H. Joshi, “Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of Alangium salvifolium (L.f.) Wang root,” Global Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 13–18, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  55. P. Swapna Latha and K. Kannabiran, “Antimicrobial activity and phytochemicals of Solanum trilobatum Linn,” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 5, no. 23, pp. 2402–2404, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  56. M. Usha1, S. Ragini, and S. M. A. Naqvi, “Antibacterial activity of acetone and ethanol extracts of Cinnamon (Cinnamomum zeylanicum) and Ajowan (Trachyspermum ammi) on four food spoilage bacteria,” International Research Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 7–11, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  57. S. Prabuseenivasan, M. Jayakumar, and S. Ignacimuthu, “In vitro antibacterial activity of some plant essential oils,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 6, article 39, pp. 1–8, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. G. A. Ayoola, F. M. Lawore, T. Adelowotan et al., “Chemical analysis and antimicrobial activity of the essential oil of Syzigium aromaticum (clove),” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 7, no. 13, pp. 2227–2231, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  59. Y. J. Fu, L. Chen, Y. Zu et al., “The antibacterial activity of clove essential oil against Propionibacterium acnes and its mechanism of action,” Archives of Dermatology, vol. 145, no. 1, pp. 86–88, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. D. Venkatesan, C. M. Karrunakarn, S. Selva Kumar, and P. T. Palani Swamy, “Identification of phytochemical constituents of Aegle marmelos responsible for antimicrobial activity against selected pathogenic organisms,” Ethnobotanical Leaflets, vol. 13, pp. 1362–1372, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  61. P. Arun, K. G. Purushotham, J. Johnsy jayarani, and V. Kumari, “In vitro Antibacterial Activity of Oldenlandia umbellata an Indian medicinal Plant,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 198–201, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  62. A. Manjamalai, R. Sardar Sathyajith Singh, C. Guruvayoorappan, and V. M. Berlin Grace, “Analysis of phytochemical constituents and antimicrobial activity of some medicinal plants in Taminadu, India,” Global Journal of Biotechnology and Biochemistry, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 120–128, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  63. E. Haslam, “Natural polyphenols (vegetable tannins) as drugs: Possible modes of action,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 205–215, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. Y. Cai, Q. Luo, M. Sun, and H. Corke, “Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds of 112 traditional Chinese medicinal plants associated with anticancer,” Life Sciences, vol. 74, no. 17, pp. 2157–2184, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. B. Shan, Y. Z. Cai, M. Sun, and H. Corke, “Antioxidant capacity of 26 spice extracts and characterization of their phenolic constituents,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 53, no. 20, pp. 7749–7759, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. R. J. W. Lambert, P. N. Skandamis, P. J. Coote, and G.-J. E. Nychas, “A study of the minimum inhibitory concentration and mode of action of oregano essential oil, thymol and carvacrol,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 453–462, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. M. Raccach, “The antimicrobial activity of phenolic antioxidants in food: a review,” Journal of Food Safety, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 141–170, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. M. Taniguchi, Y. Yano, E. Tada et al., “Mode of action of polygodial, an antifungal sesquiterpene dialdehyde,” Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 1409–1414, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  69. G. J. E. Nychas, “Natural antimicrobials from plants,” in New Methods of Food Preservation, G. W. Gould, Ed., pp. 58–89, Blackie Academic, London, UK, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  70. S. Burt, “Essential oils: their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foods—a review,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 223–253, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Ramar Perumal Samy et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.