Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine / 2018 / Article
Special Issue

Natural Products and/or Isolated Compounds on Wound Healing

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 9525624 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9525624

Kamonwan Jenwitheesuk, Porntip Rojsanga, Bowornsilp Chowchuen, Palakorn Surakunprapha, "A Prospective Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Trial of the Efficacy Using Centella Cream for Scar Improvement", Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2018, Article ID 9525624, 9 pages, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9525624

A Prospective Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Trial of the Efficacy Using Centella Cream for Scar Improvement

Academic Editor: Gioacchino Calapai
Received13 Apr 2018
Revised03 Aug 2018
Accepted16 Aug 2018
Published17 Sep 2018


Objective. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of Centella asiatica extract in cream, a preparation for the prevention of scar development of the split-thickness skin graft (STSG) donor site. Methods. A prospective randomized, double-blind control study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of Centella cream in 30 patients who underwent a STSG operation. Both Centella cream and placebo were applied equally to the donor site at least 2 weeks after epithelialization was completed. A scar assessment using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) was taken at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Results. Of the original 30 patients, 23 patients completed evaluation. There were significant differences in pigmentation parameter of VSS and comparative total VSS scores between 4 and 12 weeks in Centella cream group. Conclusion. The effect of Centella cream on scar development of a STSG operation may be attainable in terms of better pigmentation. By means of objective measurements and longer follow-up times, Centella cream may prove to be an alternative product for hypertrophic scar amelioration.

1. Introduction

Wound healing is a process that takes place with almost all medical treatments. The history of the wound care dates back to the days when natural substances, such as honey and other various remedies, were the norm for treatment since 2600-2200 BCE [1]. Later studies found that natural substances contained in herbs and plants have many positive properties that assist in and enhance the wound healing process, substances such as antioxidants, anti-inflammatories, and antibacterial agents [2]. Many species of plants support the theory that herbs have served a major role in assisting the process of recovery and healing. Studies from different parts of the world have produced concrete findings that support such theories in the era of modern medicine. Evidence stems from research regarding plants and herb usage for treating wounds in different geographical locations, countries such as Africa [3, 4], India [5], China [6] Thai [7], and even the United States, Canada, or Europe [8].

When wounds occur, the chances of a scar forming are greatly increased; scars usually have negative impact on patient. There are many methodologies such as occlusive dressings, compression therapy, intralesional corticosteroid injections, radiation therapy, laser therapy, interferon therapy, and topical silicone gel application, and herbal extracts have been prescribed as the norm. The high cost of these treatments has been the greatest obstacle for patients to continue with treatment, especially in developing countries. “Ugly scars” is a term referring to scar contracture, stretching or hypertrophic scarring resulting from abnormal response by fibroblasts during the proliferative stage and imbalance between collagen synthesis and degradation during the remodeling stage [9]. Nowadays, herbs have an important role in restoring the healing wound process and ameliorating scar. Current studies on C. asiatica have been conducted to improve the outcome of the wound healing process in small wound types and hypertrophic scar as well as burns, psoriasis, and scleroderma [1014].

Centella asiatica, also commonly known as Gotu kola, is a small plant that depends on the soil with water trapped, as a herbaceous that originates from Asia. It is an annual plant of the family Apiaceae. This plant has been used in folk medicine as well as in western medicine [15]. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of Centella asiatica extract in a cream preparation for the prevention of scar development on the STSG donor site.

2. Methods

2.1. Design Overview

All patients who participated consented to join the study on a voluntary basis as the donor site of STSG. Subjects were divided randomly into 2 groups, with various cream applied to each part of the donor’s scar site. Cream A (7% w/w Centella asiatica extract in cream preparation) or Cream B (placebo) was randomly applied on the subjects. The gels were applied for a total treatment period of 12 weeks. The assessment was conducted by one experienced nurse who was blinded to the subject grouping and was trained to administer all the assessments in standardized manner.

2.2. Setting and Participants

From January 2014 to February 2015, 36 patients who underwent split-thickness skin graft harvesting were enrolled in this study, but six patients were excluded because they declined to participate at the Outpatient Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Srinagarind Hospital. All 30 patients in this study were aged over 20 years and met the inclusion criteria. This study was approved by Khon Kaen University Ethics Committees for Human Research.

Inclusion Criteria(1)The donor site of the patients who underwent STSG operation completed more than 14 days of epithelialization.(2)All of the participants were 20 years or older.

Exclusion Criteria(1)Patients with critical illnesses such as those with systemic infection or hemodynamic instability.(2)Patients with a major acute or chronic medical illness that could have impact on the wound healing process.(3)Patients who were pregnant.(4)Patients who could not read the Thai language.(5)Patients who declined to participate.

2.3. Sample Size

30 voluntary patients were included in this study. The donor site of skin graft in each subject was divided into 2 parts, with different treatments randomly applied to each part. For sample analysis, with 23 subjects per method, the statistical power to remark a mean difference of 1 unit on the rating scale, assuming an SD of 1.71, was 80%. A 2-tailed test with type 1 error rate 5% was supposed. In statistical method, 1.00 corresponded to Mu (M) and 0.02 to the Beta (β). Concerning defense against the withdrawal of the patients, it was necessary to raise the number of patients of each group to be 30.

2.4. Randomization and Interventions

The Centella asiatica was prepared by being extracted with 70% alcohol in cream preparation (Chao Phya Abhaibhubejhr Hospital, Prachin Buri, Thailand). It was formulated from 7% w/w Centella extract, 100 gram, combined with Centella extract 7 g., cetyl alcohol 15 g., stearyl alcohol 12 g., mineral oil 5 g., cetomacrogol-1,000 3 g., propylene glycol 1 g., paraben concentrate 1.5g, and water refill for total of 100 g. for the whole combination. The Centella extract comprised asiaticoside 5.12% and madecassoside 5.1%. The placebo cream was similar in color and consistency to the Centella asiatica extract cream and was packed in the same sealed packages. For the composition, it was the same as Centella asiatica extract cream except 7 g. of paraben concentrate. Centella and placebo cream were marked A or B. The patients were advised to clean their hands before applying each cream and to use the template (Figure 1). After placing the template on the wound, the patient had to gently apply approximately 1 gram of each cream and wait until they were completely absorbed. This application was done twice daily. Each patient was scheduled for follow-up at 4, 8, and 12 weeks (Figure 2).

2.5. Outcomes and Measurements

Patient demographic data were recorded. The scars were examined and rated using the Vancouver Scar Scale (Table 1) to determine pigmentation, vascularity, pliability, and height. The digital photos of each scar were also recorded by using a digital camera each time the assessment was performed, and the photos taken were standardized with fixed distance and lighting. A digital camera was used to ensure that the images taken were clear and comparable.


HeightFlat<2 mm2-5 mm>5 mm

The Vancouver Scar Scale measured vascularity, pliability, and height, each on a 3- to 6-point ordinal scale; pigmentation was measured on a 3-point categorical scale. The results were recorded and patients identified as to which of the 2 groups they belonged after the protocol was finished. If the treatment decreased in the score of each parameter, the result concluded with improvements. If the score was the same or higher, no response was reported.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Greenhouse-Geisser correction (p value) and one-way repeated measures ANOVA were used to assess two more groups who were participants in the same group. All statistical analyses were operated using SPSS 16.0 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL.). A p value equal to or below 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant

3. Results

Only 23 of 30 patients completed the study protocol. 2 patients were excluded due to rash at the scar, which may have been caused by an allergic response to the products. 5 patients were lost to follow-up because they lived far away. Of 23 patients, there were 13 males and 10 females. The average age was 54 years old (range: 20-65 years old). As shown in Table 2 and Figures 37, differences within groups are as follows: For the Centella cream group, there were differences from baseline including the pigmentation score at 8 and 12 weeks and between 4 and 12 weeks (-0.443, p value 0.019; -0.707, p value 0.001; -0.557, p value 0.001) and the overall Vancouver Scar Scale scores between 4 and 12 weeks (-1.279, p value 0.041). However, for height, it was worse at 4 weeks (0.300, p value 0.043). For the placebo group, there were 2 differences from the baseline including the pigmentation score between 4 and 12 weeks (-0.399, p value 0.020) and after 12 weeks (-0.549, p value 0.002), while the pliability and the height scores of both groups were compared before and after treatment and still were not different.

Vancouver Scar ScaleCentella creamContrast95% CIP-value

Afterweek 4th0.400-0.799 - 1.5990.510
Afterweek 8th-0.089-1.312 - 1.1330.885
Afterweek 12th-0.879-2.102 - 0.3440.157
Between8&4 weeks-0.489-1.712 - 0.7330.429
Between12&4 weeks-1.279-2.502 - -0.0560.041
Between12&8 weeks-0.789-2.020 - 0.4410.206

Vancouver Scar ScalePlacebo

Afterweek 4th0.150-1.049 - 1.3490.805
Afterweek 8th0.312-0.911 - 1.5350.614
Afterweek 12th-0.793-2.016 - 0.4290.201
Between8&4 weeks0.162-1.061 - 1.3850.794
Between12&4 weeks-0.943-2.166 - 0.2790.129
Between12&8 weeks-1.105-2.336 - 0.1250.078

VascularityCentella cream

Afterweek 4th0.100-0.426 - 0.6260.707
Afterweek 8th-0.055-0.591 - 0.4810.838
Afterweek 12th-0.213-0.749 - 0.3230.432
Between8&4 weeks-0.155-0.691 - 0.3810.567
Between12&4 weeks-0.313-0.849 - 0.2230.249
Between12&8 weeks-0.158-0.697 - 0.3810.563


Afterweek 4th-0.050-0.576 - 0.4760.851
Afterweek 8th-0.051-0.587 - 0.4850.850
Afterweek 12th-0.367-0.903 - 0.1690.177
Between8&4 weeks-0.001-0.537 - 0.5350.996
Between12&4 weeks-0.317-0.853 - 0.2190.244
Between12&8 weeks-0.316-0.855 - 0.2240.248

PigmentationCentella cream

Afterweek 4th-0.150-0.478 - 0.1780.366
Afterweek 8th-0.443-0.777 - -0.1090.010
Afterweek 12th-0.707-1.041 - -0.3730.001
Between8&4 weeks-0.293-0.627 - 0.0410.084
Between12&4 weeks-0.557-0.891 - -0.2230.001
Between12&8 weeks-0.263-0.599 - 0.0730.124


Afterweek 4th-0.150-0.478 - 0.1780.366
Afterweek 8th-0.233-0.567 - 0.1010.170
Afterweek 12th-0.549-0.883 - -0.2150.002
Between8&4 weeks-0.083-0.417 - 0.2510.624
Between12&4 weeks-0.399-0.733 - -0.0650.020
Between12&8 weeks-0.316-0.652 - 0.0200.065

PliabilityCentella cream

Afterweek 4th0.200-0.202 - 0.6020.326
Afterweek 8th0.179-0.231 - 0.5890.389
Afterweek 12th-0.137-0.547 - 0.2730.509
Between8&4 weeks-0.021-0.431 - 0.3890.919
Between12&4 weeks-0.337-0.747 - 0.0730.106
Between12&8 weeks-0.316-0.728 - 0.0970.132


Afterweek 4th0.150-0.252 - 0.5520.461
Afterweek 8th0.312-0.098 - 0.7220.134
Afterweek 12th-0.004-0.414 - 0.4060.985
Between8&4 weeks0.162-0.248 - 0.5720.435
Between12&4 weeks-0.154-0.564 - 0.2560.458
Between12&8 weeks-0.316-0.728 - 0.0970.132

HeightCentella cream

Afterweek 4th0.3000.009 - 0.5910.043
Afterweek 8th0.229-0.067 - 0.5250.129
Afterweek 12th0.176-0.120 - 0.4730.241
Between8&4 weeks-0.071-0.367 - 0.2250.636
Between12&4 weeks-0.124-0.420 - 0.1730.410
Between12&8 weeks-0.053-0.351 - 0.2460.727


Afterweek 4th0.200-0.091 - 0.4910.176
Afterweek 8th0.284-0.012 - 0.5810.060
Afterweek 12th0.126-0.170 - 0.4230.400
Between8&4 weeks0.084-0.212 - 0.3810.575
Between12&4 weeks-0.074-0.370 - 0.2230.623
Between12&8 weeks-0.158-0.456 - 0.1400.296

4. Discussion

The split-thickness skin graft donor site is a superficial partially thickness wound in which losing the epidermis and part of the dermis exists. Epithelialization is the natural act of healing dermal tissue resulting in minimal or no scarring [16]. In most cases, scars occur if the depth reaches the dermis layer; the exposed area of the scar can be more problematic. Treatment for scars can be difficult, and in some cases the skin cannot return to its normal condition causing additional suffering to the patient. Some patients complained about discoloration, both hyperpigmentation and hypopigmentation. When hypertrophic scar or keloid developed, it may induce itching, pain, and uninviting scar damage, sometimes in the form of scar contracture which may cause organ dysfunction. In some cases, patients were unhappy and expressed a great deal of regret, anger, rejection, and isolation despair [17]. The knowledge of scar protection/prevention and causes of the scar is an important factor and helps reduce its severity. However, some Asians displayed a condition referred to as “Fitzpatrick Skin” (type III or type IV): commonly known as hypervascular, hyperpigmented, hypopigmented, or hypertrophic scars when other related characteristics are the anatomic region, patient’s skin type or genetic factors, nature of injury, skin tension, and prolonged inflammatory process [18]. Numerous attempts have been made to introduce natural substances to reduce scars such as onion extract [19, 20], resveratrol in grape’s skin [21], curcumin [22], and Centella [23].

Scar protection applications can be made by starting from coagulation, inflammation, and proliferation phase, which tried to make each phase without any complications and was time consuming. In the remodeling phase, collagen was rearranged and was broken by enzyme matrix metalloproteinase (MMPs), which is controlled by tissue inhibitors of MMP (TIMPs) [24]. The balance between regeneration and degradation of collagen was initiated during the time periods of 6 months to 1 year. The scar was entirely abnormal in appearance, the architectural arrangement of collagen, and ECM. The strategy for minimized scar needed many factors like efficiently control inflammation [25] and low levels of cytokines such as TGF βI, TGF βII, and platelet-derived growth factor [26, 27] but high levels of TGF β III [2628]. TGF β I and TGF β II played a role in activating proliferation of fibroblasts, whereas TGF β III was antagonist and that is why it could prevent scar formation [29].

Prior studies have shown the effectiveness of C. asiatica extract in promotion of wound healing and prevention of hypertrophic scars [19, 30, 31]. The active compounds of C. asiatica responsible for those activities are pentacyclic triterpenes, including asiaticoside, and madecassoside. In vitro study demonstrated that asiaticoside decreased fibroblast proliferation in a dose-related manner and reduced the expression of both TGF- β I and TGF- β II at the transcriptional and translational level [32]. Asiaticoside also slows down scar formation possibility by increasing the activity process of Smad7 which is a negative regulator of TGF-β signaling [33]. The other active composition, madecassoside, is related to inhibiting the migration of fibroblasts from keloids [34]. Both active chemical substances promote C. asiatica to induce fibroblast proliferation and collagen synthesis. It involves the improvement of the tensile strength of newly formed skin and stimulation of maturation of the scar by the production of type I collagen. Inversely, the expression of TGF-βI in hypertrophic scars and keloid is reduced [32, 34, 35]. Both asiaticoside and madecassoside affected the healing process mechanism in which inflammatory, proliferation, and remodeling phases initiate the improvement of wound healing and scar prevention [10]. In the case of animal research they showed effective result of diminished hypertrophic scar [30]. Numerous data confirmed that C. asiatica extract in a combination form with other herbs could prevent abnormal scars from median sternotomy or split-thickness skin graft donor sites; however, no exact demonstration revealed that one was stronger for preventing scar [19, 31]. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Centella cream with only one chemical substance, not combined with other herbal substances, on the prevention of scar development. Our study revealed that Centella cream improved scar outcomes against placebo. The Centella cream significantly improved the overall Vancouver scores between 4 and 12 weeks and pigmentation from the baseline since 8th week, in comparison with the improved pigmentation from the baseline since the 12th week in the placebo group. This evidence concluded that the nature of scar development of the donor site of the split- thickness skin grafts got better over time, ameliorating by Centella effect. Figures 8 and 9 demonstrated the better outcome in skin pigmentation after applying the Centella cream. In this study, an allergic dermatitis was observed in 2 patients. Gomes reported in the reported case that the patient had contact dermatitis due to Centella asiatica extract [36]. Since the allergic reaction occurred with both Centella cream and placebo, the ingredients of the placebo may be responsible for the allergic dermatitis. Previous reports showed that contact dermatitis developed when paraben-containing products were applied [37].

The efficacy of C. asiatica formulation may be affected by the release of active compounds from the formulation. The animal (rat) model demonstrated the promoted cellular proliferation and collagen synthesis effects of the aqueous extract C. asiatica. The gel formulation provided significantly better healing outcome than the ointment and cream formulations [38].

The VSS is more subjective measurement. Studies with longer follow-ups may be required to confirm the benefits of this product. In the future, the dosage and the manner evaluation of efficacy of Centella asiatica need standardized experimentation in the healing process and scar prevention.

5. Conclusion

The effect of Centella cream on scar development of the donor site of the split- thickness skin grafts may be attainable in terms of better pigmentation. By means of objective measurements and longer follow-up times, Centella cream may prove to be an alternative product for hypertrophic scar amelioration.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no financial interest or commercial association with any information mentioned in this article.


This study was supported by a grant from Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University (KKU). The authors wish to thank Faculty of Medicine and the Tawanchai Project, KKU, for their support and professor James A. Will for assistance with the English-language presentation of the manuscript under the aegis of the Publication Clinic, Research Affairs, Faculty of Medicine, KKU.


  1. R. Zubair and N. Aziz, “As smooth as honey-the historical use of honey as topical medication,” JAMA Dermatology, vol. 151, no. 10, p. 1102, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. S. A. Meo, S. A. Al-Asiri, A. L. Mahesar, and M. J. Ansari, “Role of honey in modern medicine,” Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 975–978, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. C. Agyare, Y. D. Boakye, E. O. Bekoe, A. Hensel, S. O. Dapaah, and T. Appiah, “Review: African medicinal plants with wound healing properties,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 177, pp. 85–100, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. N. C. Dlova and M. A. Ollengo, “Traditional and ethnobotanical dermatology practices in Africa,” Clinics in Dermatology, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 353–362, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. Sharma, S. Gairola, Y. P. Sharma, and R. D. Gaur, “Ethnomedicinal plants used to treat skin diseases by Tharu community of district Udham Singh Nagar, Uttarakhand, India,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, pp. 140–206, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. Q. Li, Y. Niu, P. Xing, and C. Wang, “Bioactive polysaccharides from natural resources including Chinese medicinal herbs on tissue repair,” Chinese Medicine, vol. 13, no. 1, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. O. Neamsuvan and P. Bunmee, “A survey of herbal weeds for treating skin disorders from Southern Thailand: Songkhla and Krabi Province,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 193, pp. 574–585, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. M. Sharifi-Rad, D. Mnayer, M. F. Morais-Braga et al., “Echinacea plants as antioxidant and antibacterial agents: From traditional medicine to biotechnological applications,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 1653–1663, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. C. J. M. van den Helder and J. Joris Hage, “Sense and nonsense of scar creams and gels,” Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 307–313, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. R. Bahramsoltani, M. H. Farzaei, and R. Rahimi, “Medicinal plants and their natural components as future drugs for the treatment of burn wounds: an integrative review,” Archives of Dermatological Research, vol. 306, no. 7, pp. 601–617, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. L. Salas Campos, M. Fernándes Mansilla, and A. M. Martínez de la Chica, “Topical chemotherapy for the treatment of burns,” Revista de enfermería (Barcelona, Spain), vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 67–70, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  12. Y. Kimura, M. Sumiyoshi, K.-I. Samukawa, N. Satake, and M. Sakanaka, “Facilitating action of asiaticoside at low doses on burn wound repair and its mechanism,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 584, no. 2-3, pp. 415–423, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. Liu, Y. Dai, Y. Li et al., “Madecassoside isolated from Centella asiatica herbs facilitates burn wound healing in mice,” Planta Medica, vol. 74, no. 8, pp. 809–815, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J. Somboonwong, M. Kankaisre, B. Tantisira, and M. H. Tantisira, “Wound healing activities of different extracts of Centella asiatica in incision and burn wound models: an experimental animal study,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 12, article 103, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. W. Bylka, P. Znajdek-Awizeń, E. Studzińska-Sroka, and M. Brzezińska, “Centella asiatica in cosmetology,” Postepy Dermatologii i Alergologii, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 46–49, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  16. A. J. Grossman, “A simplified technique for split-thickness skin graft donor-site care,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 796-797, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J. Mirlashari, A. N. Nasrabadi, and P. M. Amin, “Living with burn scars caused by self-immolation among women in Iraqi Kurdistan: A qualitative study,” Burns, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 417–423, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. I. F. K. Muir, “On the nature of keloid and hypertrophic scars,” British Journal of Plastic Surgery, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 61–69, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. K. Jenwitheesuk, P. Surakunprapha, K. Jenwitheesuk, C. Kuptarnond, S. Prathanee, and W. Intanoo, “Role of silicone derivative plus onion extract gel in presternal hypertrophic scar protection: A prospective randomized, double blinded, controlled trial,” International Wound Journal, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 397–402, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. S. Wananukul, S. Chatpreodprai, D. Peongsujarit, and P. Lertsapcharoen, “A prospective placebo-controlled study on the efficacy of onion extract in silicone derivative gel for the prevention of hypertrophic scar and keloid in median sternotomy wound in pediatric patients.,” Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet Thangphaet, vol. 96, no. 11, pp. 1428–1433, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  21. J. George, M. Singh, A. K. Srivastava et al., “Resveratrol and black tea polyphenol combination synergistically suppress mouse skin tumors growth by inhibition of activated MAPKs and p53,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 8, Article ID e23395, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. A. Scharstuhl, H. A. M. Mutsaers, S. W. C. Pennings, W. A. Szarek, F. G. M. Russel, and F. A. D. T. G. Wagener, “Curcumin-induced fibroblast apoptosis and in vitro wound contraction are regulated by antioxidants and heme oxygenase: Implications for scar formation,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 712–725, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. D. Bian, J. Zhang, X. Wu et al., “Asiatic acid isolated from Centella asiatica inhibits TGF-β1-induced collagen expression in human keloid fibroblasts via PPAR-γ activation,” International Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 1032–1042, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. C. M. Dang, S. R. Beanes, H. Lee, X. Zhang, C. Soo, and K. Ting, “Scarless fetal wounds are associated with an increased matrix metalloproteinase-to-tissue-derived inhibitor of metalloproteinase ratio,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 111, no. 7, pp. 2273–2285, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. J. Larouche, S. Sheoran, K. Maruyama, and M. M. Martino, “Immune Regulation of Skin Wound Healing: Mechanisms and Novel Therapeutic Targets,” Advances in Wound Care, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 209–231, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. M. Shah, D. M. Foreman, and M. W. J. Ferguson, “Neutralisation of TGF-beta 1 and TGF-beta 2 or exogenous addition of TGF-beta 3 to cutaneous rat wounds reduces scarring,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 985–1002, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  27. M. W. J. Ferguson and S. O'Kane, “Scar-free healing: from embryonic mechanism to adult therapeutic intervention,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 359, no. 1445, pp. 839–850, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. N. L. Occleston, H. G. Laverty, S. O'Kane, and M. W. J. Ferguson, “Prevention and reduction of scarring in the skin by Transforming Growth Factor beta 3 (TGFβ3): From laboratory discovery to clinical pharmaceutical,” Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1047–1063, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. B. Berman, A. Maderal, and B. Raphael, “Keloids and hypertrophic scars: Pathophysiology, classification, and treatment,” Dermatologic Surgery, vol. 43, pp. S3–S18, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. X. Ju-Lin, Q. Shao-Hai, L. Tian-Zeng et al., “Effect of asiaticoside on hypertrophic scar in the rabbit ear model,” Journal of Cutaneous Pathology, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 234–239, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. A. Chuangsuwanich, S. Arunakul, and S. Kamnerdnakta, “The efficacy of combined herbal extracts gel in reducing scar development at a split-thickness skin graft donor site,” Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 770–777, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. B. Tang, B. Zhu, Y. Liang et al., “Asiaticoside suppresses collagen expression and TGF-β/Smad signaling through inducing Smad7 and inhibiting TGF-βRI and TGF-βRII in keloid fibroblasts,” Archives of Dermatological Research, vol. 303, no. 8, pp. 563–572, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. S. H. Qi, J.-L. Xie, S. Pan et al., “Effects of asiaticoside on the expression of Smad protein by normal skin fibroblasts and hypertrophic scar fibroblasts,” Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 171–175, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. J. Song, H. Xu, Q. Lu et al., “Madecassoside suppresses migration of fibroblasts from keloids: involvement of p38 kinase and PI3K signaling pathways,” Burns, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 677–684, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. F. Wu, D. Bian, Y. Xia et al., “Identification of Major Active Ingredients Responsible for Burn Wound Healing of Centella asiatica Herbs,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2012, Article ID 848093, 13 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. J. Gomes, T. Pereira, C. Vilarinho, M. D. L. Duarte, and C. Brito, “Contact dermatitis due to Centella asiatica,” Contact Dermatitis, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 54-55, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. F. Hafeez and H. Maibach, “An overview of parabens and allergic contact dermatitis.,” Skin Therapy Letter, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 5–7, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  38. Sunilkumar, S. Parameshwaraiah, and H. G. Shivakumar, “Evaluation of topical formulations of aqueous extract of Centella asiatica on open wounds in rats,” Indian Journal of Experimental Biology (IJEB), vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 569–572, 1998. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2018 Kamonwan Jenwitheesuk et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.