Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine / 2019 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 1475163 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1475163

Nisma Lena Bahaji Azami, Mingyu Sun, "Zeaxanthin Dipalmitate in the Treatment of Liver Disease", Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2019, Article ID 1475163, 14 pages, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1475163

Zeaxanthin Dipalmitate in the Treatment of Liver Disease

Academic Editor: Wen-yi Kang
Received11 May 2019
Revised16 Jul 2019
Accepted29 Jul 2019
Published21 Aug 2019


Goji berry, Lycium barbarum, has been widely used in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), but its properties have not been studied until recently. The fruit is a major source of zeaxanthin dipalmitate (ZD), a xanthophyll carotenoid shown to benefit the liver. Liver disease is one of the most prevalent diseases in the world. Some conditions, such as chronic hepatitis B virus, liver cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma, remain incurable. Managing them can constitute an economic burden for patients and healthcare systems. Hence, development of more effective pharmacological drugs is warranted. Studies have shown the hepatoprotective, antifibrotic, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antiapoptotic, antitumor, and chemopreventive properties of ZD. These findings suggest that ZD-based drugs could hold promise for many liver disorders. In this paper, we reviewed the current literature regarding the therapeutic effects of ZD in the treatment of liver disease.

1. Introduction

Goji berry, Lycium barbarum, is a popular fruit consumed in China and used in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). Its description and indications first appeared in the Divine Husbandman’s Classic of Materia Medica or Shennong Ben Cao Jing [1]. In TCM, goji berry treats kidney yin and liver blood deficiencies and their related symptoms such as dry eyes and blurred or decreased vision [1]. Modern research has shown that goji berry protects against oxidative damage [2] and is a rich source of phenolics, linoleic acid, minerals such as potassium and phosphorus [3], flavonoids, as well as polysaccharides [4], such as arabinogalactan [5], and monosaccharides [6]. Goji berry also contains the highest concentration of the antioxidant xanthophyll carotenoid zeaxanthin dipalmitate (ZD) [7]. ZD is a zeaxanthin diester formed from zeaxanthin (ZE) and palmitic acid (Figure 1).

As a vital organ in the human body, the liver plays metabolic, detoxifying, immunological [8], and bile-secreting roles, which are altered under pathogenesis [810]. Liver disease is one of the most predominant diseases in the world and is often accompanied by poor prognosis. In China, it affects about 300 million people [11]. So far, there are no pharmaceutical drugs capable of reversing liver fibrosis [12] or curing conditions such as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), alcoholic liver disease (ALD), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), liver cirrhosis (LC), and liver failure (LF). Current prevention and management methods include lifestyle changes, weight loss, and abstinence [13, 14], with liver transplantation being indicated for end-stage liver disease, though patients face the challenge of finding donors and risk postoperative complications [15]. Risk factors, such as obesity, insulin resistance, alcohol consumption, and inadequate resources to prevent viral infections in some areas, contribute to the widespread and progression of liver disease [1619]. Thus, development of effective drugs is necessary. Recent interest in phytochemicals and TCM has enabled scientists to determine active ingredients in various herbs that could potentially cure liver disease. Besides goji berry-derived ZD, other active compounds have been isolated from TCM herbs, and their effects on liver disease were investigated. These include berberine (Huanglian) [20, 21], emodin (Dahuang) [22], and gastrodin (Tianma) [23, 24]. Although few studies assessing the benefits of ZD cover a wide range of liver conditions. To our best knowledge, this is the first English literature review on the subject. The properties and quantification methods of ZD are first discussed, followed by the potential therapeutic effects of ZD on liver disease. Studies employing ZE instead of ZD are also included.

2. Goji Berry

2.1. Properties of Goji Berry in TCM and Recent Literature

In TCM, goji berry is used to treat kidney yin deficiency and liver blood deficiency syndromes, which can be discerned in patients through symptom and sign collection, radial pulse palpation, and tongue’s shape and fur observation. In the case of kidney yin deficiency, palpating the radial pulse often reveals a thready and rapid pulse. The tongue body is usually dry and red with or without fur. Other clinical signs and symptoms include, but are not limited to, dry mouth and throat, night sweats, dizziness, tinnitus, weak legs and knees, and gynecological disorders such as seminal emission and amenorrhea [25]. Classical herbal formulas to tonify kidney yin such as Zuo Gui Wan (restore the left (kidney) pills) contain goji berry and are currently sold in Chinese pharmacies as OTC drugs. The Zuo Gui Wan formula was first recorded in The Complete Works of Jing Yue (Jing Yue Quan Shu) by Zhang Jingyue, a famous doctor from the Ming dynasty (1368–1644). Another OTC formula containing goji berry is Yi Guan Jian (ever-effective decoction), which was first recorded in the Qing dynasty and whose current clinical applications include acid regurgitation, gastric ulcer, and chronic hepatitis [26].

Recently, the effect of goji berry and its compounds on different diseases have been elucidated. Evidence showed that goji berry may offer retinal protection and tissue restoration in early stage of type 2 diabetes [27]. Here, ZD lowered endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress biomarkers and restored the activities of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and forkhead O transcription factor 3 α (FoxO3α). In line with these results, a nonpurified phytochemical extract from goji berry was found to have chemopreventive effects and could halt the proliferation of leukemia cells by eliminating oxidative stress and inhibiting the nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) NF-κB and PI3/AKT pathways while activating AMPK [28]. Furthermore, water-soluble Lycium barbarum polysaccharides (LBP) induced apoptosis of cervical cancer cells through the collapse of mitochondrial transmembrane potential and the accumulation of intracellular calcium and nitric oxide in cancer cells [29]. In carbon tetrachloride- (CCL4-) induced liver injury, LBP was shown to alleviate fibrosis; reduce hepatic necrosis, serum ALT, and lipid peroxidation; inhibit TLRs/NF-kB signaling pathway; and promote liver regeneration [30, 31]. LBP also displayed cardioprotective activity [32] and were reported to recover testicular function by inhibiting testicular excessive autophagy in an animal model with diabetic testicular dysfunction [33].

2.2. Zeaxanthin Dipalmitate Extraction Methods

The ability of goji berry to form chromoplasts enables the fruit to biosynthesize high levels of carotenoids such as ZE and ZD and prevent carotenoid degradation [34]. In fact, adding these carotenoids, including ZD, to cooking oils could prevent their oxidative degradation during storage and improve shelf life, which is a safer alternative to synthetic antioxidants [35]. In ZD, double bond between ZE and palmitic acid can be broken with saponification, in which case free ZE is released [36]. Due to its lipid solubility, the optimal extraction for ZD may be achieved with the use of organic solvents and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Figure 2). Acetone is usually employed to isolate ZD because its polarity is closer to the polarity of the latter [37]; however, in the case of an exhaustive extraction of total carotenoid content, other solvents are included [36, 38]. There are many studies in which ZD has been isolated and quantified. We list some of them below (Table 1).

Li et al. [39]Weller et al. [40]Peng et al. [41]Chang et al. [37]Karioti et al. [38]Zheng et al. [36]Patsilinakos et al. [42]

Study aimCompare different eluents for optimal carotenoid extractionEvaluate ZE esters, free ZE, and total ZE content in plant extracts as potential source of oleoresinsQuantify ZD in different goji berry speciesExtract ZDAchieve exhaustive extraction of total carotenoid and ZDCompare different eluents for optional extraction of total carotenoid contentUse simplified extraction method of carotenoids/conduct colorimetric analysis
Goji berry samplesFruit, freeze-driedFruit, heat-driedFruit, 2 g in 5 ml of water for 30 min and then groundFruit, freeze-dried/groundFruit, N2-freeze-dried and ground; juice; jamGoji berry juiceFruit, frozen and then unfrozen before use
ExtractionPetroleum ether/acetone (1 : 1)Methanol/ethyl acetate/light petroleum (1 : 1 : 1)Sonication petroleum ether/acetone extractionUltrasonic acetone extractionDried fruit: ultrasonication hexane/acetone (50 : 50)Hexane/ethanol/acetone (2 : 1 : 1)Ethanol-acidified water mixture/cyclohexane (1 : 1); ethyl acetate
Juice: ultrasonication hexane/acetone (40 : 60)
HPLC solventAcetonitrile/methylene chloride (60 : 42)Petroleum/acetone (94 : 6)Acetonitrile/dichloromethane (42 : 58)DichloromethaneAcetone/methanol (55 : 45)NAAcetone/methanol (80 : 20)
Quantification methodHPLC-UV-visible spectrophotometryHPLC-DAD and LC-(APCI)MSHPLC-DADHPLC + nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyHPLC-DADUV-visible spectrophotometryHPLC-DAD
InstrumentNRHP 1100 modular system (Agilent 1100)Agilent 1100NRAgilent 1200Ultrasonic stirring apparatus (25 kHz, 400 W)PerkinElmer Series 200
Column chromatographySkim-pack CLC-ODS (150 mm × 6 mm i.d.) with C18 reversed-phase columnYMC (5 μm, 250 × 4.6 mm i.d.) with C30 reversed-phase (10 × 4.0 mm i.d.) precolumnAlltima C18 (5 μm, 250 mm × 4.6 mm i.d.)(30 cm × 3 cm i.d.) and (30 cm × 10 cm i.d.)Luna RP-C18 (5 μm, 150 mm × 4.6 mm)NALuna (Phenomenax) PR-C18 (5 μm, 250 mm × 4.6 mm)
ZD recrystallizationNANANAOne sample used liquid antisolvent ethanol; another used CO2 supercritical antisolvent precipitationNANANA
Saponification (Y/N)NY, in sample intended to measure total zeaxanthin. Methanolic KOH usedNNNY, compared ZD content in saponified and nonsaponified samplesN

As reported by the authors. NR: not reported; NA: not applicable; Y/N: yes/no.

One ZD extraction method, for potentially making dietary supplements, consisted of removing goji berry glycosides, followed by ultrasonic acetone extraction of ZD and column fractioning. The obtained fraction was dissolved in dichloromethane and then precipitated by continuously applying ethanol to recrystallize ZD [37]. A second method consisted of freeze-drying the fruit with nitrogen gas (N2) before grinding it. This was followed by ultrasonication with water to remove polysaccharides and then ultrasonication with hexane/acetone (50 : 50) solvent to extract the carotenoid content. Finally, a mixture of acetone/methanol (55 : 45) was used in the mobile phase of HPLC to isolate ZD. This method showed that ZD constituted more than 85% of the total carotenoid in goji berry [38]. Another method extracting carotenoids using petroleum ether/acetone (1 : 1) followed by acetonitrile/dichloromethane (42 : 58) in the HPLC mobile phase also showed that ZD was the predominant carotenoid (this time 31–56% of total carotenoids) [41]. Similar use of solvents but with the HPLC method consisting of acetonitrile/methylene chloride (60 : 42) in the mobile phase showed that ZD accounted for 77.5% of the total carotenoids [39]. Choosing methanol/ethyl acetate/light petroleum (1 : 1 : 1) to extract ZE and ZE esters from heat-dried goji berries followed by drying the supernatant with anhydrous sodium sulfate and HPLC-DAD analysis with petroleum/acetone (94 : 6) in the mobile phase also revealed that ZD was the major xanthophyll carotenoid in goji berry [40]. Another extraction method involved freezing and storing goji berries at low temperatures before unfreezing and grinding. Extraction of carotenoids was achieved by hydroalcoholic mixture/cyclohexane (1 : 1) and ethyl acetate to prepare the aliquot. The mobile phase consisted of acetone/methanol (80 : 20). This method also validated ZD as the major carotenoid in goji berry (55–81%) [42]. As for carotenoid isolation from goji berry juice, one study showed that hexane/ethanol/acetone (2 : 1 : 1) solvent combination may ensure optimal extraction. The authors of this study reported performing both direct extraction and saponified extraction, followed by UV-visible spectrometry analysis to confirm the profiles of ZD and ZE. Direct extraction was preferred based on optimal carotenoid wavelength absorption. In this case, ZD was also reported as the predominant carotenoid in goji berry juice [36]. It is also worth noting that two geometric isomers of ZD in goji berry have been identified recently: 13Z-zeaxanthin dipalmitate and 9Z-zeaxanthin dipalmitate [43].

2.3. ZD Pharmacokinetics

ZD is a polar lipophilic and lipotropic carotenoid obtained through diet and cannot be synthesized by the human body [44]. Although ZD digestion and absorption has not clearly been mapped out, a few studies attempted to elucidate it. In vitro experiments showed that lipase and carboxyl ester lipase hydrolyzed ZD into free ZE in the small intestine, where it is absorbed [45, 46]. Furthermore, examination of enterocytes showed no traces of ZD. Rather free ZE and ZE monoesters were present [46]. Another study comparing plasma responses in the human subject after ingestion of ZD and ZE did not detect ZD in the collected blood samples. However, postingestion of ZD correlated with higher plasma ZE compared with consumption of nonesterified ZE. The authors hypothesized that the nonpolar nature of ZD, which allows effective micelle formation before lipase activity, accounts for the results [47]. Correspondingly, supplementing healthy elderly subjects with a milk-based formulation of goji berry for 90 days increased plasma zeaxanthin by 26% and antioxidant activities by 57% [48]. In another study, where volunteers supplemented with goji berry for 28 days, collected blood samples showed fasting plasma ZE increasing by 2.5 folds compared with the baseline [49]. As far as the carotenoids’ tissue distribution, a meta-analysis study concluded that ZE along with its isomers lutein (LU) and meso-zeaxanthin (MZ) concentrated in the macula. In addition, the dietary intake of ZE, LU, and MZ increased macular pigment and prevented macular degeneration in healthy individuals and age-related macular degeneration (AMD) patients [50]. Similarly, in a randomized-controlled trial, patients with early AMD consumed goji berries (GB) for 90 days, after which ZE serum levels and macular pigment optical density were significantly higher than the baseline and control group [51]. In animal models, ZE was found in the liver, spleen, and fat and its concentration in these tissues increased after consumption of goji berry [52, 53]. From these studies, we gathered that the uptake of ZD increased the bioavailability of ZE in the blood, macula, spleen, liver, and adipose tissue.

3. Zeaxanthin Dipalmitate and Liver Disease

3.1. Fibrosis and Biomarkers in Liver Disease

Fibrogenesis or tissue scarring is common in chronic liver disease and may evolve into cirrhosis. As fibrous tissues form in response to injury, the histology and hemodynamics [54] of the liver are altered, impairing its function. During fibrogenesis, Kupffer cells respond to chemokines such as CXCL6 by secreting transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF‐β1) through the SMAD2/BRD4/C‐MYC/EZH2 pathway [55]. TGF‐β1 activates hepatic stellate cells (HSC), which turn into myofibroblasts and shift from storing vitamin A in normal conditions to producing extracellular matrix proteins. In addition, HSC release chemokines and increase the number of inflammatory receptors [56].

So far, there are no FDA-approved drugs for hepatic fibrosis. Nonetheless, studies showed that ZD may ameliorate and inhibit tissue scarring. In fact, histological findings in one animal study showed that oral ZD (25 mg/kg) inhibited secondary fibrosis and decreased the collagen content (including 4-hydroxyproline) in the liver. ZD also restored glutathione S-transferase (GST) activity, which was shown to bind and neutralize bilirubin [57]. In another animal study employing ZE, histopathological assessment indicated that ZE (25 mg/kg) inhibited liver fibrosis [58]. Moreover, treatment with ZD improved hepatic histology and reduced fibrosis in the AFLD model (25 mg/kg) and in the superimposed nonobese nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and HBV animal model (2 mg/kg) [59, 60]. Although ZD was shown to attenuate liver fibrosis, the underlying mechanisms are still unclear. Overall, studies have been limited to histological observations. Recent discovery of the role of synectin in fibrogenesis and how this scaffold protein regulates HSC’s platelet-derived growth factor receptors (PDGFR), PDGFR-α, and PDGFR-β may further clarify the mechanisms of fibrosis [61]. Synectin could also be used in future ZD studies to investigate how ZD inhibits fibrosis at a molecular level.

Screening for most hepatic diseases involves measuring the level of serum liver enzymes, which serve as biomarkers of liver injury. Abnormal laboratory results show elevated liver enzymes alanine aminotransferase (ATL) (also called glutamic pyruvic transaminase) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST). In case of hepatobiliary or bone disorders, abnormal levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) are also detected [62]. On the contrary, albumin, the most abundant protein in the plasma, decreases in most hepatic diseases, notably in ALD where ethanol inhibits albumin synthesis [63]. In healthy individual, ALT normal range is not standardized and varies from one clinical laboratory to another depending on the local population [64]. The AST : ALT ratio is below 2; otherwise, a ratio exceeding 2 is usually associated with alcoholic hepatitis [65]. Administration of ZD after bile duct ligation induced fibrosis and improved serum ALT, AST, and ALP levels in a dose-dependent manner [57]. ZD also ameliorated serum ALT in the AFLD animal model [59] and serum ALT, AST, ALP, and ALB levels in the superimposed NASH and chronic HBV model [60]. Moreover, concurrent exposure of primary hepatocytes to CCL4 and ZD showed that ZD inhibited the release of ALT and sorbitol dehydrogenase (SDH) [66]. Inhibition of SDH was shown to induce the antiaging and antiapoptotic enzyme SIRT1 and protect the liver against ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury and tissue necrosis [67].

Finally, elevated serum levels of total cholesterol and low-density lipoproteins (LDL) are often detected in AFLD and NASH patients. Administration of ZD regulated the imbalanced levels of total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) in NASH and AFLD models [59, 60]. In addition, ZD restored the expression of lipogenic sterol-regulator element binding protein-1c (SREBP-1c) and decreased lipolytic adipose triglyceride lipase ATGL [60].

3.2. Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

The prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has rapidly risen over the past years making the disease one of the leading causes of liver transplant after hepatitis C virus in the United States [68]. The disease is also associated with a high lifetime economic burden for patients [69]. NAFLD features hepatocellular fatty change or steatosis, which can be identified with imaging or biopsy. It can be further divided into nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). NAFL tends to be benign and nonprogressive and is characterized by the presence of simple steatosis, or fat infiltration in the hepatocytes, without hepatocyte injury. On the contrary, NASH may evolve into cirrhosis and is characterized by the presence of steatosis and inflammation with hepatocyte injury (such as ballooning) with or without fibrosis [70]. NAFLD risk factors include visceral obesity, excessive BMI, type 2 diabetes mellitus, high HDL levels, and dyslipidemia [71]. Proinflammatory factors such as cytokines and oxidative stress may contribute to the progression of NAFL into NASH. As there is no cure for NAFLD, only lifestyle changes or bariatric surgery to reduce visceral obesity can inhibit inflammation and reverse steatosis [72]. The pathogenesis of NAFLD remains unclear; however, different hypotheses have been developed to elucidate it. Such hypotheses include the two-hit hypothesis and the multifactor-hit hypothesis, both of which underline a more-than-one-step process of NAFLD development [73].

Studies have shown that NASH induces cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP2E1) [72], an enzyme, metabolizing hydrophobic compounds and organic solvents, which include hepatotoxic agents such as CCL4 [74]. Other factors such as ethanol, fasting, diabetes, obesity, and a high-fat/low-carbohydrate diet also induce CYP2E1, which in turn generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) in hepatic mitochondria and ER [75] and induces lipid peroxidation [76]. The subsequent imbalance between oxidants and antioxidants (oxidative stress) leads to liver injury and inflammation [75].

ZE treatment in the NASH animal model reduced lipid peroxidation levels and oxidative stress in a dose-dependent manner [58]. In one population-based research in China, 2,935 participants had their serum carotenoid levels analyzed. The prevalence of NAFLD among the middle-aged and old participants was 50.6%, and NAFLD severity was determined by abdominal ultrasonography. Assessment of serum ZE and its isomer LU (ZE + LU) showed that high serum levels of ZE + LU significantly and inversely correlated with NAFLD severity [77].

In a superimposed nonobese NASH and chronic HBV model, wild-type and hepatitis B virus (HBV) transgenic mice were treated with 2 mg/kg ZD three times a week for eight weeks [60]. This treatment was shown to partially restore the animal body weight and reduced liver-to-body weight ratio. More importantly, ZD reduced steatosis in hepatocytes, inflammation, and fibrosis and restored liver function. Furthermore, ZD upregulated the gene expression of antioxidant enzymes catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) and reduced the activity of oxidative stress biomarkers 3-nitrotyrosine (3-NTR) and malondialdehyde (MDA) [60]. Studies [78, 79] have showed a positive correlation between elevated proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α, and the occurrence of NAFLD. The levels of chemokine monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1) were also elevated in simple steatosis patients [80]. Treatment with ZD lowered all proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines such as TNF-α, IL-1ß, IL-6, and MCP-1 and reduced the activities of caspase 3/7 and 8 [60]. These findings highlighted the potential antioxidative, anti-inflammatory, and antiapoptotic roles of ZD in the treatment of NASH.

3.3. Hepatitis B Virus

HBV is a hepatotropic noncytopathic DNA virus leading to acute and chronic infections. Globally, 250 million people are estimated to have chronic HBV. Hepatitis B-related complications include cirrhosis and HCC, which are fatal and account for more than half million of death per year [81, 82]. Different genotypes of HBV exist and influence the formation of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) as well as HBV DNA’s intracellular and extracellular levels. These genotypes may also cause different degrees of damage in hepatocytes and determine the disease prognosis [82, 83]. Overall, chronic hepatitis B virus has no cure despite development of novel antiviral and immune therapies [84]. Inducing NASH in the transgenic HBV mice model reactivated HBV replication, while ZD administration reduced HBV DNA replication and serum HBsAg levels [60]. These preliminary results call for further investigation as ZD could be a potential therapeutic agent in the treatment of viral hepatic infections.

3.4. Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Like NAFLD, alcoholic fatty liver disease (AFLD) is characterized by steatosis with or without inflammation. The etiology however differs in that AFLD is alcohol-induced. More broadly, alcoholic liver disease (ALD) refers to a range of ethanol-induced liver injuries, such as steatosis, alcoholic hepatitis, and cirrhosis, caused by excessive consumption of alcohol (>20–30 g/day). Alcohol abstinence is prescribed in all stages of ALD. Survival rate and increased risk of developing cirrhosis are seen in patients who fail to abstain from alcohol and manage their lifestyle after diagnosis [85, 86]. Histological stages of ALD often include simple steatosis, alcoholic hepatitis, and chronic hepatitis with fibrosis or cirrhosis [87]. In addition to alcohol consumption, risk factors of developing ALD include genetic predisposition, ethnicity, diet, obesity, concurrent viral infections, and gender [85, 87].

At the hepatocyte levels, ethanol is converted into acetaldehyde with the help of the oxidizing enzymes alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and CYP2E1 [88]. The activation of CYP2E1 to oxidize ethanol increases oxidative stress by producing ROS and reactive nitrogen species (RNS). Chronic ethanol-induced reactive species alter the morphology and function of mitochondria and may lead to hepatocyte apoptosis [89]. To counter ethanol-induced hepatotoxicity, damaged mitochondria are eliminated by mitophagy through the PINK1-Parkin pathway [90]. Moreover, evidence suggests that this CYP2E1-meditated oxidative stress reduces the phosphorylation of Akt in the liver, which in turn induces steatosis [91]. In this process, intestinal permeability to endotoxin increases [92], and liposaccharides (LPS) from Gram-negative bacteria leak into the blood circulation and trigger the release of macrophages in the blood and liver. These macrophages secrete cytokines such as TNFα, IL-1β, and IL-6 and trigger NF-κB [93]. The activation of Kupffer cells in the liver eventually lead to liver fibrosis.

As previously mentioned, ZD attenuated liver fibrosis and improved hepatic histology in the AFLD animal model [59], where it was reported to modulate MAPK pathways (i.e., p38 MAPK, ERK, and JNK) to reduce ethanol-induced hepatotoxicity. Here, ZD inhibited the phosphorylation of p38 MAPK and JNK, which had been increased with chronic ethanol administration. On the contrary, the inhibition of p38 MAPK and ERK (but not JNK) impaired the therapeutic effect of ZD. Furthermore, the carotenoid (25 mg/kg) reinstated the animals’ body weight, restored the expression levels of SOD1 and CAT, as in the NASH animal model [60], and lowered the expression of cytochrome CYP2E1. Inhibition of CYP2E1 was shown to decrease highly reactive free radicals and protect against liver injury in other studies [9496], possibly through the HMGB1-TLR4 signaling pathway [97, 98]. Similarly, ZD administration reduced the oxidative stress products serum MDA and plasma 8-isoprostane. ZD also inhibited the activity of NF-kB, by restoring NF-kB cytosolic inhibitor-kappa B-alpha (IkBa), and downregulated the expression levels of TNFα, IL-1β, IL-6, and MCP-1. Finally, as ethanol induces hepatocyte apoptosis, ZD downregulated the mRNA expressions of proapoptosis genes Bax-1 and caspase-3/7 and upregulated the expression of Bcl-2 [59]. Another study [99] established the ability of ZD to ameliorate liver histology in the ALFD model and decrease serum levels of ALT and AST. The authors showed ZD binding to two receptors, P2X7 and adipoR1, which in turn induced mitophagy. The role of ZD-modulating autophagy was then verified by inhibiting systemic autophagy and specific receptors P2X7 and adipoR1, which impaired the therapeutic effect of ZD. After binding to P2X7 and adipoR1, ZD inhibited PI3K/AkT and activated the AMPK/FoxO3a pathway, which restored mitophagy and inactivated the NLRP3 inflammasome pathway. Inactivation of NLRP3 decreased caspase-1 activity as well as IL-1ß and TN-Fa and restored cellular autophagy through the upregulation of the gene expressions of Atg5, beclin-1, and LC3A/B and the downregulation of p62, caspase-3/7, and caspase-8. Overall, as in the NASH model, ZD played antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antihepatotoxic, and antiapoptotic roles in the treatment of AFLD.

3.5. Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of primary liver cancer and the third leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide with about 6-month life expectancy from the time of diagnosis. HCC is associated with chronic liver diseases with HBV infection being the most common risk factor. Other risk factors include HCV, cirrhosis, and diabetes. Geographically, HCC incidence has been higher in regions with widespread of HBV and HCV, such as East Asia, combined with chronic alcoholism or consumption of aflatoxin B1-contaminated peanuts. In the US, HCC incidence and mortality have been increasing across different demographic groups and were associated with a medical history of HBV and HCV [100, 101]. Treatment options for early-stage HCC involve liver resection, transplantation, percutaneous ablation, and chemoembolization; however, early diagnosis remains difficult [102]. The pathogenesis of HCC is a multistep process involving alteration of gene expression. Moreover, HBV and HCV, with chronic aflatoxin exposure or excessive alcohol consumption, produce inflammatory responses, which generate ROS [101].

In vitro, rat ascites hepatoma AH109 A cells were cocultured with rat mesothelial cells. The addition of ZE to the culture inhibited AH109 invasion. This inhibitory effect increased when AH109 cells were pretreated with ROS-generating enzymes before adding ZE. In addition, pretreating AH109 with ZE before culturing AH109 with mesothelial cells lowered AH109 invasive activities. The authors of the study concluded that ZE may remain in the plasma membrane and inhibit HCC invasion through its antioxidant properties [103]. In line with these findings, Woodall et al. [104] showed that ZE protected phospholipids in aqueous solution and liposome against lipid peroxidation, which could be through allylic hydrogen abstraction. This involves the transfer of a hydrogen atom from ZE to the radical for radical stabilization [105]. Moreover, compared with β-carotene, astaxanthin, and lycopene, zeaxanthin offers the greatest protection against lipid peroxidation in liposomes [104]. These results support the antioxidant properties of ZE. So far, and to our best knowledge, there are no published studies on the effect of ZD on HCC.

3.6. Liver Failure

Liver failure (LF) is a fatal condition in which the liver loses its functions. The disease can be categorized into acute liver failure, acute-on-chronic liver failure, and decompensated liver cirrhosis. Acute LF is a severe impairment of liver function marked by hepatic encephalopathy and bleeding as result of liver necrosis. This condition has an acute onset (within 6 months) and can be caused by viral infections, autoimmune hepatitis, and drug allergy-induced liver damage [106]. Acute-on-chronic LF is an acute liver deterioration of pre-existing chronic liver disease. Bernal et al. [107] divides it further into three types: type A includes noncirrhotic condition which histologically differs from acute LF by the presence of substantial hepatic fibrosis, type B compensated cirrhosis with hepatic deterioration after a major insult, and type C occurs in patients with previous or concurrent cirrhotic decompensation. Finally, cirrhosis occurs following chronic liver injury, which produces extensive fibrosis. Most cirrhotic patients are asymptotic until they develop decompensated cirrhosis, in which case patients may have symptoms such as ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, and variceal bleeding [108].

All liver failure cases are accompanied by poor prognosis, and this often calls for liver transplantation as the only life-saving intervention. Liver transplantation faces many challenges such as organ availability and timing of surgery. One potential treatment for acute LF is stem cell therapy, in which differentiated hepatocyte-like cells are transplanted in the failing liver where stem cells can recover essential hepatic functions [109]. However, this therapy have so far resulted in low cell survival after transplantation due to the stem cells’ inability to adapt to an impaired liver environment, in which they fail to resist oxidative and inflammatory stress [110].

Treating human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hADMSC) with ZD before transplantation increased stem cell survival and improved the therapeutic outcome [111]. Incubation of stem cells with ZD (0.5 μm), in a differentiation medium, inhibited inflammation and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production via the PKC/Raf-1/MAPK/NF-kB pathway, which upregulated microRNA-210, and maintained cell homeostasis. Here, ZD reduced TNF-α and IL-6 as well as the activity of caspases 3/7 and 8 and recovered the GSH/GSSG ratio and CAT/SOD1 protein expression. ZD also increased the secretion of IL-10, a hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) from stem cells and promoted their differentiation into hepatocytes. This was shown by the increased levels of proteins α-fetoprotein (AFP) and hepatocyte nuclear factor 4α (HNF4), the improved expression of liver-regeneration genes, epidermal growth factor (EGF) and oncostatin M (OSM), and the enhanced secretion of urea and albumin. Finally, the study highlighted the potential role of ZD in optimizing stem cell therapy [111].

3.7. ZD Safety

All reviewed papers reported no side effects from ZD and ZE treatment. Toxicological studies involving ZE support these findings [112].

4. Future Challenges and Prospects

The literature on ZD and its nonesterified form ZE in the treatment of liver disease is limited regardless of the safety and potential therapeutic effects of this carotenoid (Table 2, Figure 3). Nonetheless, as the trend of investigating the properties of herbal active compounds is on the rise and with goji berry’s increasing popularity and commercialization as a superfood, ZD will likely get more attention from the scientific community, and its effect on liver disease might be studied further.

Experimental drugModelExperiement durationDose (ZD or ZE) and course of treatmentCase/controlDisease typeMethodEfficacyControlZD side effectReferenceReference #

ZDHepatocytes of Wistar rats25.5 hours0.1 μM; 1 μM; 10 μMNAALD/ethanol-induced liver injuryCell culture in 10 nM CCI4-containing mediumInhibited ALT and SDH in a dose-dependent mannerUnchallenged and untreated cellsNoneKim66
ZE0.1 μM; 1 μM; 10 μMNAALD/ethanol-induced liver injuryCell culture in 10 nM CCI4-containing mediumInhibited ALT and SDH in a dose-dependent mannerUnchallenged and untreated cellsNone
ZDWistar rats6 weeks12.5 mg/kg/d; 25.0 mg/kg/d16/5Hepatic fibrosis (secondary biliary fibrosisBile duct ligation25 mg/kg significantly reduced collagen content in the liver. TBARS decreased. Elevated serum ALT significantly decreased at 25.0 mg/kgSham operationNoneKim57
ZEMongolian gerbils6 weeks12.5 mg/kg/d; 25.0 mg/kg/618/6NASHMC dietDecreased oxidative stress and liver fibrosis in a dose-dependent manner. 25 mg/kg/d inhibited fibrosisRegular chowNoneChamberlain58
ZE + LUPopulation-based study4 year and 8 months: July 2008–June 2010 and April 2011–January 2013NA2,935/NANASHNA/Regular dietHigh serum levels of ZE + LU significantly and inversely correlated with NAFLD severityNANoneCao77
ZDTransgenic balb/c mice; wild-type balb/c mice8 weeks2 mg/kg for three days a week70/10NASH + HBVMC diet and HBV transgenic mouse phenotypeRestored body weight. Inhibited oxidative stress. Regulated liver enzyme levels. Lowered production HBV DNA replication and serum HBsAg levelsRegular chowNoneLi60
ZDSprague–Dawley rats10 weeks25 mg/kg/d from 5 to 10th week18/6AFLDIntragastrically fed 4.0 g/kg ethanol diluted in water for 10 weeksRestored body weight. Improved liver histology. Decreased inflammation and apoptosis. Reduced hepatic oxidative stress. Did not change blood alcohol levelRegular chowNoneXiao59
ZDSprague–Dawley rats; BRL-2A cells6 weeksExperiments: in vitro: 1 μM. AFLD animal model: 10 mg/kg/d for 2 weeks; systemic autophagy inhibition model: 10 mg/kg/d for 6 weeks; knockdown of P2X7 and AdipoR1: 10 mg/kg/d for 6 weeks48/16 (not clear)AFLDLieber-DeCarli liquid diet with ethanol intake increased gradually and maintained at 5% (w/v)Induced mitophagy. Inhibited the P13 K/AKT pathway and restored AMPK/Fox3a. Partially inhibited NLRP3 inflammasomeDextrin/maltose-based liquid dietNoneGao99
ZEAH109A cells2 months5 μMNAHepatocellular carcinomaAH109 A cells cultured in Donryu rats’ peritoneal cavity and harvested for in vitro assaysInhibited AH109 A cell invasion through its antioxidant properties. ZE may remain in the cell membraneControl medium 0.5% DSMO aloneNoneKozuki103
ZDHuman adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hADMSC); nonobese/diabetic severe combined immunodeficient (NOD/SCID) mice1 week0.5 μM84/12Liver failureIntraperitoneal injection of nonobese diabetic severe combined immunodeficient mice with pretreated stem cellsOptimized stem cell therapy in animal model. Improved stem cell visibility ratio and decreased apoptosis. Upregulated miR-210 expression. Reduced the activity of caspases 3/7 and 8 and recovered GSH/GSSG and CAT/SOD1 levelsIntraperitoneal injection with PBS onlyNoneLiu111

5. Conclusion

The carotenoid ZD yields very promising applications in the treatment of liver disease. Although research has shown its safety and antioxidant, hepatoprotective, antiapoptotic, antifibrotic, antitumor, and anti-inflammatory qualities, further studies are needed, especially clinical ones to investigate the efficacy of ZD in treating patients with liver disease.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.


This work was supported by the major project of Shanghai Municipal S and T Commission (no. 15DZ1900104), the fourth outstanding TCM talents of the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Innovation Course of Postgraduate Students in Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (2017), Shanghai Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Clinical Medicine, Key Disciplines of Liver and Gall Bladder Diseases, and Key Laboratory of Chronic Deficiency Liver Disease of the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of the People’s Republic of China.

Supplementary Materials

Graphical abstract. (Supplementary Materials)


  1. D. Bensky and T. J. Kaptchuk, Chinese Herbal Medicine Materia Medica, Eastland Press, Inc., Seattle, WA, USA, 3rd edition, 2004.
  2. Y. Liu and Y. Zhang, “Lycium barbarum polysaccharides alleviate hydrogen peroxide-induced injury by up-regulation of miR-4295 in human trabecular meshwork cells,” Experimental and Molecular Pathology, vol. 106, pp. 109–115, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. Z. Endes, U. Nurhan, M. Ö. Mehmet, E. Fatif et al., “Physico-chemical properties, fatty acid composition and mineral contents of goji berry (Lycium barbarum L.) fruit,” Journal of Agroalimentary Processes and Technologies, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 36–40, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  4. Y. Lu, S. Guo, F. Zhang et al., “Comparison of functional Components and antioxidant Activity of Lycium barbarum L. Fruits from different Regions in China,” Molecules, vol. 24, no. 12, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. R. Tang, X. Chen, T. Dang et al., “Lycium barbarum polysaccharides extend the mean lifespan of Drosophila melanogaster,” Food and Function, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 4231–4241, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. D. Montesano, L. Cossignani, L. Giua et al., “A simple HPLC-ELSD method for sugar analysis in goji berry,” Journal of Chemistry, vol. 2016, Article ID 6271808, 5 pages, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. B. S. Inbaraj, H. Lu, C. F. Hung, W. B. Wu, C. L. Lin, and B. H. Chen, “Determination of carotenoids and their esters in fruits of Lycium barbarum Linnaeus by HPLC-DAD-APCI-MS,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 47, no. 4-5, pp. 812–818, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. B. Gao, “Basic liver immunology,” Cellular and Molecular Immunology, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 265-266, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. J. Heindel, B. Blumberg, M. Cave et al., “Metabolism disrupting chemicals and metabolic disorders,” Reproductive Toxicology, vol. 68, pp. 3–33, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. Acalovschi, “Gallstones in patients with liver cirrhosis: incidence, etiology, clinical and therapeutical aspects,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 20, no. 23, pp. 7277–7285, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. F. S. Wang, J. G. Fan, Z. Zhang, B. Gao, and H. Y. Wang, “The global burden of liver disease: the major impact of China,” Hepatology, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 2099–2108, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Sun and T. Kisseleva, “Reversibility of liver fibrosis,” Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. S60–S63, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. L. Z. Kong, N. Chandimali, Y.-H. Han et al., “Pathogenesis, early diagnosis, and therapeutic management of alcoholic liver disease,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 20, no. 11, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. N. Chalasani, Z. Younossi, J. E. Lavine et al., “The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases,” Hepatology, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 328–357, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. B. Bozkurt, M. Dayangac, and Y. Tokat, “Living donor liver transplantation,” Chirurgia, vol. 112, no. 3, pp. 217–228, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. R. Parker, S. J. Kim, G. Y. Im et al., “Obesity in acute alcoholic hepatitis increases morbidity and mortality,” EBioMedicine, vol. 45, pp. 511–518, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. E. Loftfield, N. D. Freedman, G. Y. Lai et al., “Higher glucose and insulin levels are associated with risk of liver cancer and chronic liver disease mortality among men without a history of diabetes,” Cancer Prevention Research, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 866–874, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. F. Åberg, J. Helenius-Hietala, P. Puukka, M. Färkkilä, and A. Jula, “Interaction between alcohol consumption and metabolic syndrome in predicting severe liver disease in the general population,” Hepatology, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 2141–2149, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. C. W. Spearman and M. W. Sonderup, “Health disparities in liver disease in sub-Saharan Africa,” Liver International, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 2063–2071, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. X. Zhu, H. Bian, L. Wang et al., “Berberine attenuates nonalcoholic hepatic steatosis through the AMPK-SREBP-1c-SCD1 pathway,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 141, pp. 192–204, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. Y. Luo, G. Tian, Z. Zhuang et al., “Berberine prevents non-alcoholic steatohepatitis-derived hepatocellular carcinoma by inhibiting inflammation and angiogenesis in mice,” American journal of translational research, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 2668–2682, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
  22. F. Liu, J. Zhang, J. Qian, G. Wu, and Z. Ma, “Emodin alleviates CCl4-induced liver fibrosis by suppressing epithelial-mesenchymal transition and transforming growth factor-β1 in rats,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 3262–3270, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. L.-L. Qu, B. Yu, Z. Li, W.-X. Jiang, J.-D. Jiang, and W.-J. Kong, “Gastrodin ameliorates oxidative stress and proinflammatory response in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease through the AMPK/Nrf2 pathway,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 402–411, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. X. X. Li, Z. H. Jiang, B. Zhou, C. Chen, and X. Y. Zhang, “Hepatoprotective effect of gastrodin against alcohol-induced liver injury in mice,” Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 29–37, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. Z. Liu, Essentials of Chinese Medicine, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2009.
  26. D. Chen, “Formulas of traditional Chinese medicine,” in Chinese-English Bilingual Textbooks for International Students of Chinese TCM Institutions, pp. 422–426, People’s Medical Publishing House, Beijing, China, 2nd edition, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  27. L. Tang, Y. Zhang, Y. Jiang et al., “Dietary wolfberry ameliorates retinal structure abnormalities in db/db mice at the early stage of diabetes,” Experimental Biology and Medicine, vol. 236, no. 9, pp. 1051–1063, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. Y. Jiang, Y. Zhang, L. Wark et al., “Wolfberry water soluble phytochemicals down-regulate ER stress biomarkers and modulate multiple signaling pathways leading to inhibition of proliferation and induction of apoptosis in jurkat cells,” Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences, vol. 1, no. S2, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. C.-P. Zhu and S.-H. Zhang, “Lycium barbarumpolysaccharide inhibits the proliferation of HeLa cells by inducing apoptosis,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 149–156, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. J. Xiao, E. C. Liong, Y. P. Ching et al., “Lycium barbarum polysaccharides protect mice liver from carbon tetrachloride-induced oxidative stress and necroinflammation,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 139, no. 2, pp. 462–470, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. F. Gan, Q. Liu, Y. Liu et al., “Lycium barbarum polysaccharides improve CCl 4 -induced liver fibrosis, inflammatory response and TLRs/NF-kB signaling pathway expression in wistar rats,” Life Sciences, vol. 192, pp. 205–212, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. R. Zhang, Y. Xu, H. Niu et al., “Lycium barbarum polysaccharides restore adverse structural remodelling and cardiac contractile dysfunction induced by overexpression of microRNA-1,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 4830–4839, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. G. J. Shi, J. Zheng, X.-X. Han et al., “Lycium barbarum polysaccharide attenuates diabetic testicular dysfunction via inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway-mediated abnormal autophagy in male mice,” Cell and Tissue Research, vol. 374, no. 3, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  34. Y. Liu, S. Zeng, W. Sun et al., “Comparative analysis of carotenoid accumulation in two goji (Lycium barbarum L. and L. ruthenicum Murr.) fruits,” BMC Plant Biology, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 269, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. D. Montesano, G. Rocchetti, L. Cossignani et al., “Untargeted metabolomics to evaluate the stability of extra-virgin olive oil with added Lycium barbarum carotenoids during storage,” Foods, vol. 8, no. 6, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. X. Zheng, F. Zhu, M. Wu, X. Yan, X. Meng, and Y. Song, “A rapid and effective approach for on-site assessment of total carotenoid content in wolfberry juice during processing,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 95, no. 14, pp. 2951–2955, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. L.-P. Chang, J.-H. Cheng, S.-L. Hsu, B.-C. Liau, T.-M. Wu, and C.-M. J. Chang, “Application of continuous supercritical anti-solvents for rapid recrystallization and purification of zeaxanthin dipalmitates from de-glycosides of Lycium barbarum fruits,” The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 155–161, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. A. Karioti, M. C. Bergonzi, F. F. Vincieri, and A. R. Bilia, “Validated method for the analysis of goji berry, a rich source of zeaxanthin dipalmitate,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 62, no. 52, pp. 12529–12535, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. Z. Li, G. Peng, and S. Zhang, “Separation and determination of carotenoids in Fructus lycii by isocratic non-aqueous reversed-phase liquid chromatography,” Se Pu (Chinese Journal of Chromatography/Zhongguo Hua Xue Hui), vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 341–343, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  40. P. Weller and D. E. Breithaupt, “Identification and quantification of zeaxanthin esters in plants using liquid chromatography−mass spectrometry,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 51, no. 24, pp. 7044–7049, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. Y. Peng, C. Ma, Y. Li, K. S.-Y. Leung, Z.-H. Jiang, and Z. Zhao, “Quantification of zeaxanthin dipalmitate and total carotenoids in Lycium fruits (Fructus Lycii),” Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 161–164, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. A. Patsilinakos, R. Ragno, S. Carradori, S. Petralito, and S. Cesa, “Carotenoid content of Goji berries: CIELAB, HPLC-DAD analyses and quantitative correlation,” Food Chemistry, vol. 268, pp. 49–56, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. J.-T. Long, H.-X. Fan, Z.-Q. Zhou et al., “The major zeaxanthin dipalmitate derivatives from wolfberry,” Journal of Asian Natural Products Research, pp. 1–8, 2019, In press. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. H. Tapiero, D. M. Townsend, and K. D. Tew, “The role of carotenoids in the prevention of human pathologies,” Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 100–110, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. X. Wen, J. Hempel, R. M. Schweiggert, Y. Wang, Y. Ni, and R. Carle, “Screening of critical factors influencing the efficient hydrolysis of zeaxanthin dipalmitate in an adapted in vitro- digestion model,” Food Chemistry, vol. 257, pp. 36–43, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. C. Chitchumroonchokchai and M. L. Failla, “Hydrolysis of zeaxanthin esters by carboxyl ester lipase during digestion facilitates micellarization and uptake of the xanthophyll by Caco-2 human intestinal cells,” The Journal of Nutrition, vol. 136, no. 3, pp. 588–594, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. D. E. Breithaupt, P. Weller, M. Wolters, and A. Hahn, “Comparison of plasma responses in human subjects after the ingestion of 3R,3R’-zeaxanthin dipalmitate from wolfberry (Lycium barbarum) and non-esterified 3R,3R’-zeaxanthin using chiral high-performance liquid chromatography,” British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 707–713, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. P. Bucheli, K. Vidal, L. Shen et al., “Goji berry effects on macular characteristics and plasma antioxidant levels,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 257–262, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. C. Y. Cheng, W. Y. Chung, Y. T. Szeto, and I. F. F. Benzie, “Fasting plasma zeaxanthin response to Fructus barbarum L. (wolfberry; Kei Tze) in a food-based human supplementation trial,” British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 123–130, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. L. Ma, R. Liu, J. Du, T. Liu, S. Wu, and X. Liu, “Lutein, zeaxanthin and meso-zeaxanthin supplementation associated with macular pigment optical density,” Nutrients, vol. 8, no. 7, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. S. Li, N. Liu, L. Lin, E. D. Sun, J. D. Li, and P. K. Li, “Macular pigment and serum zeaxanthin levels with Goji berry supplement in early age-related macular degeneration,” International Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 970–975, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. I. Leung, M. Tso, W. Li, and T. Lam, “Absorption and tissue distribution of zeaxanthin and lutein in rhesus monkeys after taking Fructus lycii (Gou Qi Zi) extract,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 466–471, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  53. Y. Toyoda, L. R. Thomson, A. Langner et al., “Effect of dietary zeaxanthin on tissue distribution of zeaxanthin and lutein in quail,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 1210–1221, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  54. K. T. Suk and D. J. Kim, “Staging of liver fibrosis or cirrhosis: the role of hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement,” World Journal of Hepatology, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 607–615, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. X. Cai, Z. Li, Q. Zhang et al., “CXCL6-EGFR-induced Kupffer cells secrete TGF-β1 promoting hepatic stellate cell activation via the SMAD2/BRD4/C-MYC/EZH2 pathway in liver fibrosis,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 5050–5061, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. S. L. Friedman, “Mechanisms of disease: mechanisms of hepatic fibrosis and therapeutic implications,” Nature Clinical Practice Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 98–105, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. H. P. Kim, E. J. Lee, Y. C. Kim et al., “Zeaxanthin dipalmitate from Lycium chinense fruit reduces experimentally induced hepatic fibrosis in rats,” Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 390–392, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. S. M. Chamberlain, J. D. Hall, J. Patel et al., “Protective effects of the carotenoid zeaxanthin in experimental nonalcoholic steatohepatitis,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 1460–1464, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. J. Xiao, J. Wang, F. Xing et al., “Zeaxanthin dipalmitate therapeutically improves hepatic functions in an alcoholic fatty liver disease model through modulating MAPK pathway,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 4, Article ID e95214, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. J.-J. Li, H. Gao, Y. Lv et al., “Zeaxanthin dipalmitate alleviates hepatic injury induced by superimposed chronic hepatitis B and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in non-obese mice,” Journal of Asian Natural Products Research, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 910–923, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. M. C. Drinane, U. Yaqoob, H. Yu et al., “Synectin promotes fibrogenesis by regulating PDGFR isoforms through distinct mechanisms,” JCI Insight, vol. 2, no. 24, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. M. M. Kaplan, “Alkaline phosphatase,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 286, no. 4, pp. 200–202, 1972. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. M. A. Rothschild, M. Oratz, and S. S. Schreiber, “Alcohol, amino acids, and albumin synthesis,” Gastroenterology, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 1200–1213, 1974. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. B. A. Neuschwander-Tetri, “Influence of local reference populations on upper limits of normal for serum alanine aminotransferase levels,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 168, no. 6, pp. 663–666, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. M. Botros and K. A. Sikaris, “The de ritis ratio: the test of time,” The Clinical Biochemist Reviews, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 117–130, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  66. S. Y. Kim, H. P. Kim, H. Huh, and Y. C. Kim, “Antihepatotoxic zeaxanthins from the fruits ofLycium chinense,” Archives of Pharmacal Research, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 529–532, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. C. Zhang, X. Li, and Q. Liu, “Sorbitol dehydrogenase inhibitor protects the liver from ischemia/reperfusion-induced injury via elevated glycolytic flux and enhanced sirtuin 1 activity,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 283–288, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. R. J. Wong, M. Aguilar, R. Cheung et al., “Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is the second leading etiology of liver disease among adults awaiting liver transplantation in the United States,” Gastroenterology, vol. 148, no. 3, pp. 547–555, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. Z. M. Younossi, R. Tampi, M. Priyadarshini et al., “Burden of illness and economic model for patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in the United States,” Hepatology, vol. 69, no. 2, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. E. Hashimoto, K. Tokushige, and J. Ludwig, “Diagnosis and classification of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: current concepts and remaining challenges,” Hepatology Research, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 20–28, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. N. Chalasani, Z. Younossi, J. E. Lavine et al., “The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guideline by the American gastroenterological association, American association for the study of liver diseases, and American college of gastroenterology,” Gastroenterology, vol. 142, no. 7, pp. 1592–1609, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. G. C. Farrell and C. Z. Larter, “Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: from steatosis to cirrhosis,” Hepatology, vol. 43, no. S1, pp. S99–S112, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. E. Buzzetti, M. Pinzani, and E. A. Tsochatzis, “The multiple-hit pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD),” Metabolism, vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 1038–1048, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. E. Tanaka, M. Terada, and S. Misawa, “Cytochrome P450 2E1: its clinical and toxicological role,” Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 165–175, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. H. Cichoż-Lach and A. Michalak, “Oxidative stress as a crucial factor in liver diseases,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 20, no. 25, pp. 8082–8091, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  76. G. Robertson, I. Leclercq, and G. C. Farrell, “II. Cytochrome P-450 enzymes and oxidative stress,” American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, vol. 281, no. 5, pp. G1135–G1139, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. Y. Cao, C. Wang, J. Liu, Z.-M. Liu, W.-H. Ling, and Y.-M. Chen, “Greater serum carotenoid levels associated with lower prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Chinese adults,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 12951, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. Y. Y. Seo, Y. K. Cho, J.-C. Bae et al., “Tumor necrosis factor-α as a predictor for the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a 4-year follow-up study,” Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 41–45, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. J. M. Hui, A. Hodge, G. C. Farrell, J. G. Kench, A. Kriketos, and J. George, “Beyond insulin resistance in NASH: TNF-? or adiponectin?” Hepatology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 46–54, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. G. Kirovski, C. Dorn, H. Huber et al., “Elevated systemic monocyte chemoattractrant protein-1 in hepatic steatosis without significant hepatic inflammation,” Experimental and Molecular Pathology, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 780–783, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. P. Karayiannis, “Hepatitis B virus: virology, molecular biology, life cycle and intrahepatic spread,” Hepatology International, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 500–508, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. M. Sunbul, “Hepatitis B virus genotypes: global distribution and clinical importance,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 20, no. 18, pp. 5427–5434, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. C.-L. Lin and J.-H. Kao, “New perspectives of biomarkers for the management of chronic hepatitis B,” Clinical and Molecular Hepatology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 423–431, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. A. S. Lok, F. Zoulim, G. Dusheiko, and M. G. Ghany, “Hepatitis B cure: from discovery to regulatory approval,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 847–861, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. R. S. O’Shea, S. Dasarathy, and A. J. McCullough, “Alcoholic liver disease,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 14–33, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. F. Scaglioni, S. Ciccia, M. Marino, G. Bedogni, and S. Bellentani, “ASH and NASH,” Digestive Diseases, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 202–210, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. R. Bruha, K. Dvorak, and J. Petrtyl, “Alcoholic liver disease,” World Journal of Hepatology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 81–90, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. N. A. Osna, T. M. Donohue, and K. K. Kharbanda, “Alcoholic liver disease: pathogenesis and current management,” Alcohol Research: Current Reviews, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 147–161, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  89. S. M. Bailey, “A review of the role of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species in alcohol-induced mitochondrial dysfunction,” Free Radical Research, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 585–596, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  90. J. A. Williams and W.-X. Ding, “Targeting Pink1-Parkin-mediated mitophagy for treating liver injury,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 102, pp. 264–269, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. T. Zeng, C.-L. Zhang, N. Zhao et al., “Impairment of Akt activity by CYP2E1 mediated oxidative stress is involved in chronic ethanol-induced fatty liver,” Redox Biology, vol. 14, pp. 295–304, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. V. Purohit, J. C. Bode, C. Bode et al., “Alcohol, intestinal bacterial growth, intestinal permeability to endotoxin, and medical consequences: summary of a symposium,” Alcohol, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 349–361, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. R. A. Ansari, K. Husain, and S. A. Rizvi, “Role of transcription factors in steatohepatitis and hypertension after ethanol: the epicenter of metabolism,” Biomolecules, vol. 6, no. 3, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. Z. J. Zhang, Z.-Y. Xia, J.-M. Wang et al., “Effects of flavonoids in lysimachia clethroides duby on the activities of cytochrome P450 CYP2E1 and CYP3A4 in rat liver microsomes,” Molecules, vol. 21, no. 6, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. H. I. Lee, R. A. McGregor, M.-S. Choi et al., “Low doses of curcumin protect alcohol-induced liver damage by modulation of the alcohol metabolic pathway, CYP2E1 and AMPK,” Life Sciences, vol. 93, no. 18-19, pp. 693–699, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. C. P. Stice, C. Liu, K. Aizawa, A. S. Greenberg, L. M. Ausman, and X.-D. Wang, “Dietary tomato powder inhibits alcohol-induced hepatic injury by suppressing cytochrome p450 2E1 induction in rodent models,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 572, pp. 81–88, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. G. Yang, L. Zhang, L. Ma et al., “Glycyrrhetinic acid prevents acetaminophen-induced acute liver injury via the inhibition of CYP2E1 expression and HMGB1-TLR4 signal activation in mice,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 50, pp. 186–193, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. H. Gaskell, X. Ge, and N. Nieto, “High-group box-1 and liver disease,” Hepatology Communications, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 1005–1020, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. H. Gao, Y. Lv, Y. Liu et al., “Wolfberry-derived zeaxanthin dipalmitate attenuates ethanol-induced hepatic damage,” Molecular Nutrition and Food Research, vol. 63, no. 11, Article ID e1801339, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. S. F. Altekruse, K. A. McGlynn, and M. E. Reichman, “Hepatocellular carcinoma incidence, mortality, and survival trends in the United States from 1975 to 2005,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1485–1491, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. M. A. Feitelson, B. Sun, N. Lale Satiroglu Tufan, J. Liu, J. Pan, and Z. Lian, “Genetic mechanisms of hepatocarcinogenesis,” Oncogene, vol. 21, no. 16, pp. 2593–2604, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. A. Forner, J. M. Llovet, and J. Bruix, “Hepatocellular carcinoma,” The Lancet, vol. 379, no. 9822, pp. 1245–1255, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  103. Y. Kozuki, Y. Miura, and K. Yagasaki, “Inhibitory effects of carotenoids on the invasion of rat ascites hepatoma cells in culture,” Cancer Letters, vol. 151, no. 1, pp. 111–115, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  104. A. A. Woodall, G. Britton, and M. J. Jackson, “Carotenoids and protection of phospholipids in solution or in liposomes against oxidation by peroxyl radicals: relationship between carotenoid structure and protective ability,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—General Subjects, vol. 1336, no. 3, pp. 575–586, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  105. N. I. Krinsky and K.-J. Yeum, “Carotenoid-radical interactions,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 305, no. 3, pp. 754–760, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  106. K. Sugawara, N. Nakayama, and S. Mochida, “Acute liver failure in Japan: definition, classification, and prediction of the outcome,” Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 849–861, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  107. W. Bernal, R. Jalan, A. Quaglia, K. Simpson, J. Wendon, and A. Burroughs, “Acute-on-chronic liver failure,” The Lancet, vol. 386, no. 10003, pp. 1576–1587, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  108. F. F. Poordad, “Presentation and complications associated with cirrhosis of the liver,” Current Medical Research and Opinion, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 925–937, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  109. R. N. Wesson and A. M. Cameron, “Stem cells in acute liver failure,” Advances in Surgery, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 117–130, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  110. W. Zeng, J. Xiao, G. Zheng et al., “Antioxidant treatment enhances human mesenchymal stem cell anti-stress ability and therapeutic efficacy in an acute liver failure model,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 11100, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  111. Y. Liu, Y. Xiong, F. Xing et al., “Precise regulation of mir-210 is critical for the cellular homeostasis maintenance and transplantation efficacy enhancement of mesenchymal stem cells in acute liver failure therapy,” Cell Transplantation, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 805–820, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  112. J. A. Edwards, “Zeaxanthin: review of toxicological data and acceptable daily intake,” Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 2016, Article ID 3690140, 15 pages, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Nisma Lena Bahaji Azami and Mingyu Sun. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.