Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine / 2019 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 8314693 | 29 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8314693

Genus Miliusa: A Review of Phytochemistry and Pharmacology

Academic Editor: Armando Zarrelli
Received01 Jul 2019
Accepted15 Jul 2019
Published14 Aug 2019


Background. Genus Miliusa (family Annonaceae), widely distributed in mainland Asia and Australia to New Guinea, has been employed in both traditional herbal uses and pharmacological medicines. Original research articles related to this genus are now available, but supportive reviews highlighting phytochemical and pharmacological aspects are now insufficient. Objective. This account is an overview of most of the compounds isolated from this genus, along with their pharmacological evaluations. Conclusion. A vast amount of data showed that genus Miliusa contained various classes of secondary metabolites. Herein, more than two hundred constituents were isolated, comprising alkaloids, geranylated homogentisic acids, flavonoids, lignans, neolignans, terpenoids, acetogenins, styryls, lactones, phenolics, amides, alcohols, and furfural derivatives. Novel miliusanes and bicyclic lactones have been remarkable characteristics of Miliusa plants. Essential oils from these plants were also detected, with a high amount of β-caryophyllene. Numerous in vitro biological researches on, for example, anticancer, antifungal, antimycobacterial, anti-inflammation, and cardiac activity, especially in terms of cytotoxicity, using either isolated compounds or plant extracts, implied that Miliusa phytochemical components now set out to have a key role in pharmacological development. M. smithiae ethyl acetate extract and its flavonoid ayanin (75) inhibited the growth of MCF-7 cell line comparable with positive control ellipticine. (+)-Miliusol (72) stimulated in vivo anticancer experiment against HCT116 xenograft mouse tumor following the p21-dependent induction of cellular senescence mechanism.

1. Introduction

People around the world have been extensively using herbal plants and their products for healthcare objectives. As can be seen, the aromatic medicinal plants have been extensively researched as an important resource of commercial drugs because of their wide traditional uses and pharmacological potencies [1]. Natural products are also recognized to be among the richest resources for new drugs and/or drug leaders due to their high structural diversity as they are not available throughout synthetic pathways [2]. Genus Miliusa (family: Annonaceae) comprises about 60 species and is widely native throughout India and Bhutan to Australia and New Guinea, but mostly found in many Asia countries such as Vietnam, Thailand, and China [3].

More than thirty newly rare secondary metabolites belong to derivatives of geranylated homogentisic acid; in particular, the serial novel miliusanes I-XXXI could be seen as characteristic signals to recognize plants from genus Miliusa.

Phytoconstituents derived from Miliusa plants were subjected to cytotoxic activity, acetylcholinesterase inhibition, activation of cardiac myosin ATPase, anticancer, antifungal, antibacterial, antimalaria, anti-inflammation, anti-herpes, and antioxidant activity [414].

In Southeast Asian traditional medicines, M. balansae species was used for gastropathy and glomerulonephropathy, M. velutina was recommended as tonic and aphrodisiac medicine, or with Thai people, M. thorelii species, also known as “Maa-Dam”, was applied to analgesic treatment [7, 8].

Secondary metabolites from medicinal plants of genus Miliusa are renowned for traditional uses and pharmaceutical potentials. However, there have not been specific reviews to assess the value of this genus, to the best of our knowledge. The current paper deals with most researches over the past 20 years related to Miliusa species and has given a great insight into the botanical description, the correlated chemical isolated compounds in phytochemical aspect, and their role in pharmacological applications. Databases used to search for literature mostly rely on the Plant List, SCI-Finder, Google Scholar, the Web of Science, Scopus, Hindawi, Bentham Science, Science Direct, PubMed, Chemical Abstracts, ACS journals, Springer, Taylor Francis, Wiley Online Library, Thieme Medical Publishers, and IOP Science.

2. Botanical Description

(i) Nomenclature: According to a database of the Plant List (www.Theplantlist.org, 2019), the following acceptable names of thirteen Miliusa species were listed at a level of high confidence: M. balansae Finet & Gagnep., M. bannaensis X.L. Hou, M. brahei (F. Muell.) Jessup, M. glochidioides Hand.-Mazz., M. horsfieldii (Bennett) Baill. ex Pierre, M. indica Lesch. ex A.DC., M. macropoda Miq., M. prolifica (Chun & F.C. How) P.T. Li, M. sclerocarpa (A.DC.) Kurz, M. sinensis Finet & Gagnep., M. tenuistipitata W.T. Wang, M. traceyi Jessup, and M. velutina (A.DC.) Hook.f. & Thomson [15].

Besides known nineteen Thai species, from morphological point of view, seven new species were found in Thailand: M. fragrans Chaowasku & Kessler sp. nov., M. hirsuta Chaowasku & Kessler sp. nov., M. intermedia Chaowasku & Kessler sp. nov., M. nakhonsiana Chaowasku & Kessler sp. nov., M. sessilis Chaowasku & Kessler sp. nov., M. thailandica Chaowasku & Kessler sp. Nov, and M. umpangensis Chaowasku & Kessler sp. nov. [16]. By using DNA-barcoding analysis and the morphological comparisons with the two species M. pumila Chaowasku and M. filipes Ridl., M. chantaburiana Damthongdee & Chaowasku was recorded as a new species, growing in Bangkok, Thailand [17]. In the same way, an allied member of M. indica Leschen, named M. jainii Goel at Sharma, sp. nov., was discovered in South Andaman, India, and three new species, M. cambodgensis sp. nov., M. astiana, and M. ninhbinhensis spp. nov., were reported to grow in Cambodia and Vietnam, respectively [3, 18].

(ii) Phylogeny: Genus Miliusa belongs to the tribe Miliuseae of the subfamily Malmeoideae of the pantropical family Annonaceae [16, 19]. Plants of this genus established a close relationship with two genera, Hyalostemma Wall and Saccopetalum Benn., and a distinguishing feature between them can be the different number of ovules (Hyalostemma only one, Miliusa two, and Saccopetalum more than two) [19].

(iii) General morphology: The plants exist in shape of shrub or tree (up to ca. 40 m high). The wood appeared yellow when fresh but became darker on exposure; the parenchyma was in fine tangential lines, forming a network with the narrow to moderately broad to broad rays. The mature leaf in M. horsfieldii, for instance, indicated elliptic to ovate shape [19]. Miliusa species have also been shown to be associated with the following characteristics: equally sized sepals and outer petals both of which are much smaller than the inner petals, a densely hairy torus, miliusoid stamens, i.e. stamens without conspicuously dilated connective tissue covering the thecae, and four part-lamellate ruminations of the endosperm [16].

(iv) Distribution: Genus Miliusa, until now, has been reported to consist of about 60 species [17], distributed throughout India and Bhutan to Australia and New Guinea, but mostly found in mainland Asia [19].

3. Phytochemical Investigation

Nowadays, the methods and the processes of the isolation and elucidation of naturally occurring compounds from the medicinal plants have received heavy supports from the modern techniques, such as high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), gas chromatography-mass spectrum (GC-MS), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis), infrared (IR), optical rotation (OR), and circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopies [1, 20]. We, herein, set out an updated phytochemical account of all isolated metabolites from Miliusa species, principally based on chromatographic procedures. Many works have been carried out on the phytochemical investigations of several parts of ten plants, namely, M. balansae, M. CF. banacea, M. cuneata, M. fragrans, M. mollis, M. sinensis, M. smithiae, M. thorelii, M. umpangensis, and M. velutina [4, 7, 2126]. Two hundred twenty secondary metabolites were recorded and presented in Table 1 and Figures 19. The names of the isolated compounds have been prepared following the arrangement of alphabetical words. In addition, Table 2 indicated a list of main essential oils from five studied species: M. baillonii, M. brahei, M. horsfieldii, M. traceyi, and M. sinensis [2729]. Isolated metabolites of Miliusa species were classified into a wide range, including alkaloids, geranylated homogentisic acids, flavonoids, lignans and neolignans, acetogenins, styryls, mono-phenols, terpenoids, amines and amides, alcohols, furans, and other types. The first group of thirty-two compounds 1-32 was referred to as alkaloids [4, 7, 2126]. Forty-one metabolites from compound 33 to compound 73 could be conveniently classified into the group of homogentisic acid derivatives [7, 13, 14, 3034]. The structures 74-116 were recognized to be flavonoids [7, 8, 11, 25, 30, 33, 3538]. Lignans and neolignans were also found in the plants of genus Miliusa and were actually described by the state of next compounds 117-144 [7, 9, 10, 24]. Due to the remarkable features, the serial compounds 145-158 were assignable to the group of acetogenin derivatives [5, 32, 3840]. Ten compounds 159-168 can be seen as lactones [11, 38], and eight constituents 169-176 belonged to styryl derivatives [31, 32, 38, 41]. Terpenoids included the structures 177-185 [11, 25, 37, 42]. The reports of mono-phenols and their glycosides from Miliusa species are now available elsewhere, but, herein, they were summed up in a total of thirteen compounds 186-198 [11, 24, 30, 32, 42]. Six amines and amides 199-204 [7, 8, 26], six alcohols 205-210 [11], three aldehydes type furfurals 211-213 [32], and last compounds 214-220 [25, 26, 32, 41] have been identified as the remaining metabolites present in genus Miliusa.


1AsimilobineM. mollis twig[24]
2CoclaurineM. balansae stem[26]
3DehydroxylopineM. cuneata stem and leaf[21]
41,9-Dihydroxy-2,11-dimethoxy-4,5-dihydro-7-oxoaporphineM. cuneata stem and leaf[21]
52,10-Dimethoxy-3,11-dihydroxy-5,6-dihydroprotoberberineM. cuneata stem and leaf[21]
6N,O-DimethylharnovineM. cuneata stem and leaf[21]
710-HydroxyliriodenineM. CF. banacea root[4]
8IsocorydineM. velutina stem bark[23]
9(+)- Isocorydine α-N-oxideM. velutina stem bark[22]
10KinabalineM. cuneata stem and leaf[21]
11LanuginosineM. cuneata stem and leaf[21]
12LiriodenineM. balansae stem; M. cuneata stem and leaf; M. mollis twig, M. sinensis leaf and branch; M. velutina stem bark [21, 2326, 37]
13(+)-LiriotulipiferineM. cuneata stem and leaf[21]
1410-Methoxyliriodenine (lauterine)M. CF. banacea root[4]
151-N-MethylcoclaurineM. balansae stem[26]
16N-MethylcorydaldineM. cuneata stem and leaf[21]
17N-MethyllindcarpineM. cuneata stem and leaf[21]
18Miliusacunine AM. cuneata leaf[7]
19Miliusacunine BM. cuneata leaf[7]
20Miliusacunine CM. cuneata leaf[7]
21Miliusacunine DM. cuneata leaf[7]
22Miliusacunine EM. cuneata leaf[7]
23Miliusathorine AM. thorelii stem and root[8]
24Miliusathorine BM. thorelii stem and root[8]
25NorcorydineM. velutina stem bark[23]
26(-)-NordicentrineM. cuneata stem and leaf[21]
27NorisocorytuberineM. cuneata stem and leaf[21]
28(−)-NorushinsunineM. mollis twig; M. thorelii stem and root[8, 24]
29PseudocolumbamineM. cuneata stem and leaf[21]
30ReticulineM. velutina stem bark[23]
31SalutarineM. cuneata stem and leaf[21]
32WilsonirineM. cuneata stem and leaf[21]
Homogentisic acid derivatives
33Methyl 2-(1′β-geranyl-5′β-hydroxy-2′-oxocyclohex-3′-enyl) acetateM. umpangensis leaf; M. velutina fruit[32, 33]
342-(1′β-Geranyl-5′β-hydroxy-2′-oxocyclohex-3′-enyl) acetic acidM. velutina fruit and flower[32]
35MiliusanalM. velutina fruit[32]
36Miliusanone AM. velutina fruit[32]
37Miliusanone BM. velutina fruit[32]
38Miliusanone CM. velutina flower[32]
39Miliusanone DM. velutina flower[32]
40(+)-MiliusateM. balansae leaf, branch and stem; M. sinensis leaf, twig and flower; M. umpangensis leaf[13, 14, 31, 33, 34]
41(+)-Miliusane IM. balansae stem; M. sinensis leaf, twig and flower; M. umpangensis leaf[13, 14, 33]
42(+)-Miliusane IIM. balansae stem; M. sinensis leaf, twig and flower[13, 14]
43(+)-Miliusane IIIM. sinensis leaf, twig and flower[14]
44(+)-Miliusane IVM. sinensis leaf, twig and flower[14]
45(+)-Miliusane VM. sinensis leaf, twig and flower[14]
46(+)-Miliusane VIM. sinensis leaf, twig and flower[14]
47(+)-Miliusane VIIM. sinensis leaf, twig and flower[14]
48(+)-Miliusane VIIIM. sinensis leaf, twig and flower[14]
49(+)-Miliusane IXM. balansae stem; M. sinensis leaf, twig and flower[13, 14]
50(+)-Miliusane XM. sinensis leaf, twig and flower[14]
51(+)-Miliusane XIM. sinensis leaf, twig and flower[14]
52(+)-Miliusane XIIM. sinensis leaf, twig and flower[14]
53(+)-Miliusane XIIIM. sinensis leaf, twig and flower[14]
54(+)-Miliusane XIVM. balansae stem; M. Sinensis leaf, twig and flower[13, 14]
55(+)-Miliusane XVM. balansae stem; M. Sinensis leaf, twig and flower[13, 14]
56(+)-Miliusane XVIM. sinensis leaf, twig and flower[14]
57(+)-Miliusane XVIIM. balansae stem; M. sinensis leaf, twig and flower[13, 14]
58(+)-Miliusane XVIIIM. sinensis leaf, twig and flower[14]
59(+)-Miliusane XIXM. sinensis leaf, twig and flower[14]
60(+)-Miliusane XXM. sinensis leaf, twig and flower[14]
61Miliusane XXIM. balansae stem[13]
62Miliusane XXIIM. balansae stem[13]
63Miliusane XXIIIM. balansae stem[13]
64Miliusane XXIVM. balansae stem[13]
65Miliusane XXVM. balansae stem[13]
66Miliusane XXVIM. balansae stem[13]
67Miliusane XXVIIM. balansae stem[13]
68Miliusane XXVIIIM. balansae stem[13]
69Miliusane XXIXM. balansae stem[13]
70Miliusane XXXM. balansae stem[13]
71Miliusane XXXIM. balansae stem[13]
72(+)-MiliusolM. balansae leaf, stem and branch; M. cuneata leaf, M. sinensis leaf, twig and flower; M. umpangensis leaf[7, 13, 14, 24, 30]
73MiliusolideM. balansae leaf and branch[30]
74ArtemetinM. thorelii leaf[8]
75Ayanin (5,3′-dihydroxy-3,7,4′-trimethoxyflavone)M. smithiae leaf and twig; M. umpangensis leaf[33, 36]
76Chrysosplenol B (chrysoplenetin)M. balansae leaf and branch; M. cuneata twig[7, 35]
77Chrysosplenol CM. balansae leaf and branch[11, 30, 35]
78Chrysosplenol DM. umpangensis leaf[33]
793,5-Dihydroxy-7,3′,4′-trimethoxyflavoneM. sinensis leaf and branch[25, 37]
806,4′-Dihydroxy-3,5,7-trimethoxyflavoneM. thorelii stem and root[8]
81DimethylmikaninM. thorelii stem and root[8]
823,5,6,7,3′,4′-HexamethoxyflavoneM. thorelii leaf[8]
835-Hydroxy-3,7-dimethoxy-3′,4′-methylenedioxyflavoneM. cuneata leaf and twig; M. thorelii stem, root and leaf[7, 8]
845-Hydroxy-3,7,4′-trimethoxyflavoneM. smithiae leaf and twig[36]
855-Hydroxy-3,6,7,4′-tetramethoxyflavoneM. thorelii stem and root[8]
864′-Hydroxy-3,5,6,7-tetramethoxyflavoneM. thorelii stem and root[8]
874′-Hydroxy-3,5,7,3′-tetramethoxyflavoneM. cuneata leaf[7]
88IsokanuginM. thorelii leaf[8]
893-O-MethylkaempferolM. thorelii stem and root[8]
90MelisimplexinM. thorelii stem, root and leaf[8]
91MelisimplinM. thorelii leaf[8]
92MiliufavolM. balansae leaf and branch[35]
93MiliusathoroneM. thorelii stem and root[8]
94OmbuineM. balansae leaf and branch; M. umpangensis leaf[33, 35]
95PachypodolM. balansae leaf and branch;
M. cuneata leaf and twig; M. thorelii leaf
[7, 8, 35]
963,5,7,3′,4′-PentamethoxyflavoneM. thorelii stem, root and leaf[8]
97Quercetagetin-3,5,7-trimethyl etherM. thorelii stem and root[8]
98Quercetagetin-3,5,7,3′-tetramethyl etherM. thorelii stem and root[8]
99Quercetin-3-O-methyl etherM. thorelii stem and root[8]
100Quercetin-3,7-dimethyl etherM. thorelii stem and root; M. umpangensis leaf[8, 33]
101Quercetin-3,5,3′-trimethyl etherM. thorelii stem and root[8]
102RetusinM. thorelii stem and root[8]
103RhamnetinM. velutina leaf[38]
104RutinM. balansae leaf; M. umpangensis leaf[11, 33]
1057,3′,4′-TrimethylquercetinM. umpangensis leaf[33]
1062′,6′-Dihydroxy-4′-MethoxydihydrochalconeM. balansae leaf and branch[31]
1074′,6′-Dihydroxy-2′,3′,4-trimethoxydihydrochalconeM. sinensis leaf and branch[37]
108DihydropashanoneM. balansae leaf and branch; M. sinensis leaf and branch[25, 31, 37]
109PashanoneM. sinensis leaf and branch[6, 25, 37]
1105-Hydroxy-6,7-dimethoxyflavanone (onysilin)M. balansae leaf and branch; M. sinensis leaf and branch[6, 25, 31, 37]
1115-Hydroxy-7,8-dimethoxyflavanoneM. balansae leaf and branch; M. sinensis leaf and branch[25, 31, 37]
1125-Hydroxy-7-methoxyflavanone (pinostrobin)M. balansae leaf and branch; M. sinensis leaf and branch[25, 31, 37]
1135-Hydroxy-7,4′-methoxyflavanoneM. balansae leaf and branch; M. sinensis leaf and branch[25, 31, 37]
1147-O-MethyleriodictyolM. velutina leaf[38]
115SakuranetinM. velutina leaf[38]
116(−)-EpicatechinM. balansae leaf; M. fragrans leaf and stem; M. mollis leaf[9, 11, 24]
Lignans and neolignans
117(+)-3-HydroxyveraguensinM. fragrans stem[9]
118(7S,8S,7′R,8′S)-3,4,5,3′,4′-Pentamethoxy-7,7′-epoxylignanM. fragrans stem[9]
119(+)-SyringaresinolM. cuneata leaf[7]
120VeraguensinM. fragrans stem[9]
1212-(4-Allyl-2,6-dimethoxyphenoxy)-1-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)propaneM. mollis leaf[9]
122ConocarpanM. mollis twig[24]
123DecurrenalM. mollis leaf[10]
124(+)-3-O-Demethyleusiderin C [(7S,8R)-Δ-3-hydroxy-4,5,5′-trimethoxy-7.O.3′,8.O.4′-neolignan]M. fragrans leaf[9]
125(+)-4-O-Demethyleusiderin C [(7S,8R)-Δ-4-hydroxy-3,5,5′-trimethoxy-7.O.3′,8.O.4′-neolignan]M. fragrans leaf and stem[9]
126(2R,3R)-2,3-Dihydro-2-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-3-methyl-5-(E)-propenylbenzofuranM. mollis twig[24]
127(2S,3S)-2,3-Dihydro-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-methyl-5-[1(E)-propenyl] benzofuranM. mollis twig[24]
128(+)-Eusiderin AM. fragrans stem[9]
129Eusiderin CM. fragrans stem[9]
130Eusiderin DM. fragrans stem and leaf[9]
131Licarin AM. fragrans leaf[9]
132(7S,8S)-threo-4-MethoxyneolignanM. mollis twig[24]
1337-Methoxymiliumollin [(2R,3R)-5-allyl-2,3-dihydro-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-7-methoxy-3-methylbenzofuran]M. mollis leaf[10]
1343′-Methoxymiliumollin [(2R,3R)-5-allyl-2,3-dihydro-2-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-3-methylbenzofuran]M. mollis leaf[10]
135(−)-4-O-Methylmiliusfragrin [(7R,8R)-Δ-3,4,5′-trimethoxy-7.O.3′,8.O.4′-neolignan]M. fragrans stem[9]
1364′-O-Methylmiliumollin [(2S,3S)-5-allyl-2,3-dihydro-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-methylbenzofuran)]M. mollis leaf[10]
137(−)-Miliufragranol A [(Δ-9′-hydroxy-3,4,3′,5′-tetramethoxy-8.O.4′-neolignan]M. fragrans stem[9]
138(−)-Miliufragranol B [(Δ-4-hydroxy-3,5′-dimethoxy-8.O.4′-neolignan]M. fragrans leaf[9]
139(−)-Miliusfragrin [(7R,8R)-Δ-4-hydroxy-3,5′-dimethoxy-7.O.3′,8.O.4′-neolignan]M. fragrans leaf and stem[9]
140Miliumollin [(2R,3R)-5-allyl-2,3-dihydro-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-3-methylbenzofuran)]M. mollis leaf[10]
141Miliumollinone [(2R,3R)-2,3-dihydro-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-3-methyl-5-(2-oxopropyl)-benzofuran]M. mollis leaf[10]
142Miliusanollin [(7R,8R)-threo-7-acetoxy-4-methoxy-8-O-4′-neolignan]M. mollis leaf[10]
143(7S,8R)-7-hydroxy-3,4,3′-trimethoxy-Δ-8.O.4′-neolignanM. fragrans leaf[9]
144Virolongin BM. fragrans stem[9]
145Acetogenins AM. velutina stem bark[5]
146Acetogenins BM. velutina stem bark[5]
147Cananginone AM. velutina stem bark and flower[32, 40]
148Cananginone BM. velutina stem bark[40]
149Cananginone CM. velutina stem bark[40]
150Cananginone DM. velutina stem bark[40]
151Cananginone EM. velutina stem bark[40]
152Cananginone FM. velutina stem bark[40]
153Cananginone GM. velutina stem bark[40]
154Cananginone HM. velutina stem bark, leaf and flower[32, 38, 40]
155Cananginone IM. velutina stem bark[40]
156MiliusolideM. velutina stem bark[39]
157Miliusolide dihydro derivativeM. velutina stem bark [39]
158GoniothalamusinM. velutina stem bark[5]
159CurcolideM. balansae leaf[11]
160SerralactoneM. balansae leaf[11]
161Velutinone AM. velutina leaf[38]
162Velutinone BM. velutina leaf[38]
163Velutinone CM. velutina leaf[38]
164Velutinone DM. velutina leaf[38]
165Velutinone EM. velutina leaf[38]
166Velutinone FM. velutina leaf[38]
167Velutinone GM. velutina leaf[38]
168Velutinone HM. velutina leaf[38]
Mono-styryl derivatives
1693,4-Dimethoxy-6-styryl-pyran-2-oneM. balansae leaf and branch[31]
170(2E,5E)-2-Methoxy-4-oxo-6-phenyl-hexa-2,5-dienoic acid methyl esterM. balansae leaf and branch[31]
171YangoninM. velutina leaf, fruit and flower[32, 38]
Bi-styryl derivatives
172Miliubisstyryl AM. balansae leaf and branch[41]
173Miliubisstyryl BM. balansae leaf and branch[41]
174Velutinindimer AM. velutina leaf, fruit and flower[32, 38]
175Velutinindimer BM. velutina leaf, fruit and flower[32, 38]
176Velutinindimer CM. velutina leaf[38]
Norsesquiterpenoids type megastigmanes and megastigmane glycosides
177Alangionoside BM. balansae stem[42]
178AmpelopsisionosideM. balansae leaf[11]
179Milbaside AM. balansae leaf[11]
180Milbaside BM. balansae leaf[11]
181Milbaside CM. balansae leaf[11]
182Miliusoside CM. balansae stem[42]
183Myrsinionoside AM. balansae leaf[11]
184Myrsinionoside DM. balansae leaf[11]
18524-Methylencycloartane-3β,21-diolM. sinensis leaf and branch[25, 37]
Mono-phenols and mono-phenol glycosides
186bis(2-Hydroxyphenyl)methyl etherM. balansae leaf and branch[30]
187CuchilosideM. balansae stem[42]
1884-HydroxybenzonitrileM. velutina fruit[32]
1894-HydroxybenzaldehydeM. velutina fruit[32]
190Icariside D2M. mollis twig[24]
191IsovanillinM. velutina fruit[32]
1921-(3-Methylbutyryl)phloroglucinol-glucopyranosideM. balansae leaf[11]
193Miliusoside AM. balansae stem[42]
194Miliusoside BM. balansae stem[42]
195Osmanthuside HM. balansae stem[42]
1961-(α-L-Rhamnosyl-(1→6)-β-D-glucopyranosyloxy)-3,4,5-trimethoxybenzeneM. balansae stem[42]
1973,4,5-Trimethoxyphenol-β-D-glucopyranosideM. balansae stem[42]
198Tyrosol-1-O-β-xylopyranosyl-(1→6)-O-β-glucopyranosideM. mollis twig[24]
Amines and amides
199 Adenine ribosideM. balansae stem[26]
200 AllantoinM. balansae stem[26]
201N-trans-CaffeoyltyramineM. cuneata twig; M. thorelii stem and root[7, 8]
202N-trans-CoumaroyltyramineM. cuneata twig[7]
203N-trans-FeruloyltyramineM. cuneata twig; M. thorelii stem and root[7, 8]
204UridineM. balansae stem[26]
205β-D-Glucopyranoside (Z)-3-hexenolM. balansae leaf[11]
206erythro-GuaiacylglycerolM. balansae leaf[11]
207threo-GuaiacylglycerolM. balansae leaf[11]
208(L)-Guaiacyl glycerol 2′-O-β-D-glucopyranosideM. balansae leaf[11]
209erythro-1-C-SyringylglycerolM. balansae leaf[11]
210threo-1-C-SyringylglycerolM. balansae leaf[11]
2115-AcetyloxymethylfurfuralM. velutina fruit[32]
2125-HydroxymethylfurfuralM. velutina fruit[32]
2135-MethoxyfurfuralM. velutina fruit[32]
214D-​GlucoseM. balansae stem[26]
215Octacosanoic acidM. balansae leaf and branch[41]
216β-SitosterolM. balansae stem; M. velutina fruit[26, 32]
217β-Sitosterol glucosideM. balansae stem; M. sinensis leaf and branch[25, 26]
218Sodium benzoateM. balansae leaf and branch[30]
219StigmasterolM. sinensis leaf and branch; M. velutina fruit and flower[25, 32]
220SucroseM. balansae stem[26]

coincidence name

SpeciesCollectionsPart UsesMain constituentsReferences

M. bailloniiQuang Binh-VietnamFresh leafNaphthalene (1.0%), bicycloelemene (1.1%), germacrene B (1.2%), germacrene D (1.2%), δ-cadinene (1.4%), isolongifolene (1.2%), spathulenol (1.4%), α-terpinolene (1.5 %), elemol (1.7%), linalool (2.7%), β-elemene (3.5%), τ-muurolol (3.8%), α-humulene (6.2%), β-caryophyllene (10.6%), and Z-citral (41.2%)[28]

M. sinensisNghean-VietnamDried leaf(E)-β-Ocimene (2.4%), aromadendrene (6.6%), β-elemene (7.1%), α-humulene (7.9%) and β-caryophyllene (19.5%)[29]

M. brahei16°31’S, 145°28’E  
LeafCubeban-11-ol (1.0%), caryophyllene oxide (1.1%), α-copaene (1.2%), α-selinene (1.2%), viridiflorene (1.2%), δ-cadinene (1.8%), viridiflorol (1.8%), β-selinene (2.2%), geraniol (2.3%), (Z)-β-ocimene (2.6%), aromadendrene (3.0%), globulol (3.3%),α-terpineol (3.5%), spathulenol (3.6%), germacrene D (5.3%), linalool (7.4%), α-humulene (11.3%), β-caryophyllene (12.8%) and bicyclogermacrene (12.9%)[27]

M. horsfieldii13°48’S, 143°28’E  
LeafGeraniol (1.0%), globulol (1.2%), cubeban-11-ol (1.3%), bicycloelemene (1.8%), α-cadinol (1.9%), allo-aromadendrene (1.9%), viridiflorene (2.5%), bicyclogermacrene (2.5%), α-selinene (2.6%), β-selinene (2.8%), δ-cadinene (3.0%), α-humulene (3.4%), linalool (3.8%), α-copaene (7.5%), caryophyllene oxide (12.5%) and β-caryophyllene (20.2%),[27]

M. traceyi14°00’S, 143°19’E  
Leafδ-Cadinene (1.8%), α-humulene (2.4%), spathulenol (2.9%), limonene (3.0%), bicyclogermacrene (3.8%), germacrene D (4.9%), β-caryophyllene (13.5%), β-pinene (18.6%) and α-pinene (18.7%)[27]

3.1. Alkaloids

With natural product substances, alkaloidal compounds were famous long ago. The proportion of alkaloids has been found to deeply depend on the typical parts of the plants and environmental effects. For example, Aniszewski (2007) suggested that a large percentage of alkaloids reached up to 10-25% from the higher plants [1]. Miliusa species also provide a rich alkaloidal source. Up to now, over thirty alkaloidal constituents 1-32 were recorded, involved in the previous phytochemical investigations on several plants, M. balansae, M. CF. banacea, M. mollis, M. sinensis, M. thorelii, and M. velutina, but mostly found in M. cuneata (Figure 1) [4, 7, 2126, 37]. Among them, eleven constituents, namely, compounds 4-5, 7, 9, and 18-24, were new in nature. Liriodenine (12) was likely to be familiar with plants from genus Miliusa and widely distributed in M. balansae stem, M. cuneata stem and leaf, M. mollis twig, M. sinensis leaf and branch, and M. velutina stem bark [21, 2326, 37]. With the exception of new compounds and two known others, 12 and 28, it was remarked that the remaining compounds were isolated from this genus for the first time. Miliusa alkaloids can be found in formulating a variety of main skeletons, such as aporphine and oxo-aporphine backbones in respective asimilobine (1) and 10-hydroxyliriodenine (7), tetrahydroisoquinoline and quinolone in respective coclaurine (2) and N-methylcorydaldine (16), azafluorenone in kinabaline (10), dihydroprotoberberine and oxo-protoberberine in respective 2,10-dimethoxy-3,11-dihydroxy-5,6-dihydroprotoberberine (5) and miliusacunine A (18), benzylisoquinoline in reticuline (30), or morphinan in salutarine (31).

Taking the newly isolated alkaloids into consideration, two new oxo-aporphine and dihydroprotoberberine alkaloids 4-5, in addition to thirteen known others (Table 1), were obtained from 95% ethanol extract of air-dried and powdered stem and leaf of M. cuneata [21]. One of the immensely value aspects of 2,10-dimethoxy-3,11-dihydroxy-5,6-dihydroprotoberberine (5) is that this compound possessed the positive and negative charges in nitrogen and oxygen atoms, respectively [21]. Khan and Kumar (2015) suggested that alkaloids with bipolar charges had a tendency to bind to the serum proteins better than that of neutral compounds [43].

Following the outcomes in the isolation and NMR-structural elucidation, 10-methoxyliriodenine (14) was a known alkaloid, but its 10-hydroxylated derivative 7 was determined to be a new oxo-aporphine alkaloid in nature; both of these two compounds were precipitated out of the MeCOEt extract (2.8 g) of M. CF. banacea species [4]. Likewise, isocorydine (8), especially its new unusual derivative (+)-isocorydine α-N-oxide (9), has successfully been separated from extracts of M. velutina stem bark [22, 23].

An additional significance in phytochemical works related to plants is that the leaf of M. cuneata species is likely to be a rich source of oxo-protoberberine alkaloids. In 2005, five new alkaloids of type oxo-protoberberine were isolated from the acetone extract of M. cuneata leaf, trivially named miliusacunines A-E (18-22) [7].

Finally, three alkaloids, consisting of two new dihydro-oxo-protoberberine derivatives miliusathorines A-B (23-24) and known one (−)-norushinsunine (28), have been purified from the combined extract between stem and root of M. thorelii species [8].

3.2. Geranylated Homogentisic Acid Derivatives

Phenolic acids of type homogentisic acids are usually detected in both terrestrial plants and bacterial pathogenic strains [44, 45]. Homogentisic acids indicated the significant antioxidant and anti-inflammatory capacities, but the excess accumulation of these can cause “alkapton” symptom in the human body [45, 46].

Considerable attention should be paid to the novel class of geranylated homogentisic acid derivatives from plants of genus Miliusa. Among the total forty-one isolated compounds 33-73, secondary metabolites 40-73 were novel and relatively rare compounds in nature while a number of isolates 35-39 were new in literature.

General features were highlighted in the chemical structures 33-34 and 36-72; that is, carbonylation and geranylation often occurred at carbons C-2 (or C-2′) and C-1 (or C-1′), respectively (Figure 2). Furthermore, double bonds might be located at carbons C-3 and C-4 (or C-3′ and C-4′); hydroxylation, methoxylation, or acetoxylation was normally observed at carbon C-5 (or C-5′).

Of isolated compounds 40-72, most of these unique structures might possibly be formed by a rare C-18 skeleton, containing a characteristic γ-lactone spiro-ring system. Five-member γ-lactone ring were geranylated in the structures 40-57, 61-67, and 72, but were found to be opened in the structures 58-60 and 68-71. Two isolated compounds 59-60 also contained a tetrahydrofuran ring. Additionally, the combination of NOE effect observations, Mosher reactions, and X-ray measurements allowed for determining the absolute configuration, in which 1R,5S,1′R-form and 5β-orientation were suitable for the group of compounds 40-72 [14]. -NMR provided the evidence of chemical shifts , thereby showing that, at carbons C-1, C-5, and C-1′ of compounds containing spiro-ring system, reached ca. 52.0-56.0 ppm, ca. 63.0-68.0 ppm, and ca. 26 ppm, respectively.

As part of an interdependent work, more recently, Promgool et al. (2019) reported that chromatographic separation of extracts of M. velutina fruit and flower has resulted in isolating and elucidating five new rare geranylated homogentisic acid derivatives, miliusanal (35) and miliusanones A-D (36-39), in addition to known ones, methyl 2-(1′β-geranyl-5′β-hydroxy-2′-oxocyclohex-3′-enyl) acetate (33) and 2-(1′β-geranyl-5′β-hydroxy-2′-oxocyclohex-3′-enyl) acetic acid (34) [32]. New compound 35 indicated the property of a phenolic aldehyde with CHO ( 196.1 ppm in solvent CDCl3), whereas new compounds 38-39 were significantly made of 6′′-hydroxylated groups ( 75.6-77.4 ppm in solvent CDCl3 + CD3OD).

Novel (+)-miliusate (40) was one of the interesting constituents of Vietnamese plant M. balansae [31]. After that, it was reported appearing in two other species: M. sinensis leaf, twig and flower, and M. umpangensis leaf [14, 19, 33, 34]. So far, the methanol-water extract (95:5, v/v) of Vietnamese plant M. balansae leaf and branch has shown to comprise one novel compound, (+)-miliusol (72), and one new natural product, miliusolide (73) [30]. In NOE interactions H-3a to H-5 and H-7a were key evidence to determine these three protons with oriented cis-shape and the absolute configuration was established as 3aS,5S,7aR in compound 73.

Novel geranylated homogentisic acids derived Miliusa plants were more commonly referred to by their trivial name. By using Table 1 and Figure 2, we continue to make comments relating to a serial number of (+)-miliusanes I-XXXI (41-71). Secondary metabolites 41-60 were separated from dichloromethane extract of the other Vietnamese plant M. sinensis leaf, twig, and flower, whereas the remaining members 61-71, once again, derived from M. balansae species [13, 14]. As shown in Figure 2, the plausible biogenetic pathway explained why these compounds were classified as geranylated homogentisic acids, in which the first step involved the combination between precursor homogentisic acid and geranyl unit of geranyl diphosphate (geranyl PP). Obviously, the methylation of intermediate product A produced compound 53 while lactone ring-cyclization and dehydrate applied to A would give 72; compound 53 was then joined to epoxide ring-cyclization reaction and dehydrated to form 59 [14].

Taken together, serial compounds 40-72 were useful biomarkers for either genus Miliusa or family Annonaceae, and they also accounted for the close relationship between the two species M. balansae and M. sinensis.

3.3. Flavonoids

Now we do take a point of crucial information in mentioning another class of Miliusa metabolites. Phytochemical investigations on Miliusa species also proved the existence of flavonoids. Flavonoids were detected in leaf, twig, branch, stem, or root of nine plants: M. balansae, M. cuneata, M. fragrans, M. mollis, M. sinensis, M. smithiae, M. thorelii, M. umpangensis, and M. velutina, to date (Table 2). Herein, we draw a list of forty-three isolated compounds 74-116 from Miliusa species. Chemical index also exhibited that Miliusa flavonoids can be divided into several main groups: flavonols 74-105, chalcones 106-109, flavanones 110-115, and flavan 116 (Table 1 and Figure 3) [7, 8, 11, 25, 30, 33, 3537]. More than thirty flavonols were found but flavones and isoflavones were absent, to the best of our knowledge. Likewise, flavanones and isoflavanones have not been recorded yet.

The most important information to be gained from structural features is that isolated flavonoids derived from Miliusa species were generated as mono-flavonoid derivatives. The phenomenon of methoxylation occurred at carbon C-3 of most isolated flavonols. Normally, flavonols and flavanones were associated with substituents at carbons C-5, C-6, C-7, C-8, C-3', and C-4' by hydroxy and methoxyl groups.

Despite the fact that the known flavonoids 74, 77-82, 84-91, 96-99, 101-103, 105-107, 109, and 114-115 are abundant in the plant kingdom, these compounds were reported from Miliusa species for the first time. Rutin (104) was recognized to be only flavonol glycoside isolated from plants of genus Miliusa. In the meantime, (−)-epicatechin (116) was also a unique flavan to be found.

M. thorelii species seemed to be a rich supply of flavonols. Bioguided assay and fractionation of extracts of leaf, stem, and root afforded one new natural product, miliusathorone (92), in addition to nineteen known ones, 74, 80-83, 85-86, 88-91, and 95-102 [8]. New metabolite 92 had the characteristic remark with chemical shifts of -O-CH2-O- [ 6.06, 101.8]. Interestingly, new metabolite named miliufavol (92) was derived from methanol-water (95:5, v/v) extract of air-dried ground M. balansae leaf and branch [35], in which this compound was an uncommon flavonol by combining of pachypodol (95) and benzyl unit at carbon C-8.

Four chalcone derivatives, 2′,6′-dihydroxy-4′-methoxydihydrochalcone (106), 4′,6′-dihydroxy-2′,3′,4-trimethoxydihydrochalcone (107), dihydropashanone (108), and pashanone (109), were significant constituents of the two Vietnamese plants M. balansae and M. sinensis [25, 31, 37]. In contrast to 109, three compounds 106-108 belong to dihydrochalcone, and compound 107 was a new isolated compound in literature. Isolated flavanones 110-113 were also considered as main components of Vietnamese M. balansae and M. sinensis, but two compounds, final derivatives 7-O-methyleriodictyol (114) and sakuranetin (115), were only detected in M. velutina leaf up to now [38].

3.4. Lignans and Neolignans

We continuously provide the next phytochemical profiles of the other class of isolated compounds. Starting with the deepest aim to find biologically active molecules from genus Miliusa, four lignans 117-120 and twenty-four neolignans 121-144 have also been isolated (Table 1 and Figure 4). In addition, these phytochemicals from genus Miliusa originated from three parts, leaf, stem, and twig, of two main species, M. fragrans and M. mollis, but occasionally found in M. cuneata species [810, 24].

It is possible to set up a clear arrangement for backbones of either lignans or neolignans. Miliusa lignans were able to form up to two main skeletons, tetrahydrofuran lignan (compounds 117-118 and 120) and 7,9′:7′,9-diepoxylignan (compound 119). In the case of neolignans, three main scaffolds can be found, namely, 8.O.4′-neolignan (compounds 121, 132, 137-138, and 142-144), 7.O.3′,8.O.4′-neolignan (124-125, 128-130, 135, and 139), and dihydrobenzofuran skeleton (compounds 122-123, 126-127, 131, 133-134, 136, and 140-141). Two skeletons of 8.O.4′-neolignan and 7.O.3′,8.O.4′-neolignan were only represented in the two Thai species M. fragrans and M. mollis, thereby suggesting the close relationship between them [9, 10, 24].

Besides geranylated homogentisic acids, oxo-protoberberine alkaloids, and flavonols, chemical constituents of M. cuneata leaf were also in association with the presence of the well-known lignan (+)-syringaresinol (119) [7]. In 2013, sixteen secondary metabolites, being isolated from methanol extracts of Thai M. fragrans leaf and stem in the work of Sawasdee and partners, were described as three lignans 117-118, 120 and thirteen neolignans 121, 124-125, 128-131, 135, 137-139, and 143-144 [9]. The new lignan (+)-3-hydroxyveraguensin (117) and its relatives 118 and 120 have been structurally established as 7S,8S,7′R,8′S-configuration (cis-H-7/H-7′, cis-H-7′/H-8′, trans-H-7/H-8, and trans-H-8/H-8′). The new neolignans 124-125, 128, 135, and 139 and two known ones 129-130 shared the same structure of three parts, 5-methoxyl-phenylpropanoid unit, 2-methyl-1,4-dioxane unit, and phenyl ring linkage to carbon C-7. However, the absolute configurations were elucidated as 7S,8R for 124-125 and 129-130, 7S,8S for 128, and 7R,8R for 135 and 139, but the stereochemistry for new 8.O.4′-neolignans 137-138 and their analogs 138 and 144 could not be determined.

In the two years 2010 and 2013, Sawadee and partners provided the results of the phytochemical isolation and NMR-structural elucidation of Thai M. mollis, in which one new neolignan of type dihydrobenzofuran (2S,3S)-2,3-dihydro-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-methyl-5-[1(E)-propenyl]benzofuran (127), one new 8.O.4′-neolignan (7S,8S)-threo--4-methoxyneolignan (132), and two known others 123 and 126 were isolated from twig; five new neolignans of type dihydrobenzofuran 7-methoxymiliumollin (133), 3′-methoxymiliumollin (134), 4′-O-methylmiliumollin (136), miliumollin (140), miliumollinone (141); one new 8.O.4′-neolignan miliusanollin (142); and one known other (123) were derived from leaf [9, 10].

Neolignans of type dihydrobenzofuran from Thai plants have been shown to be associated with 2R,3R-absolute configuration (trans-H-2/H-3) in groups 122-123, 126, 133-134, and 140-141 and 2S,3S-absolute configuration (cis-H-2/H-3) in 127 and 136, while new compound 132 set up 7S,8S-model when compared to 7R,8R-model in 142 and 7S,8R-model in 143.

3.5. Acetogenins and Lactones

A bit of the attractive phytochemical outcome arose from the class of isolated acetogenins. As we know, acetogenins and their analogs are now remarkable characteristics of the family Annonaceae [47]. From Table 1 and Figure 5, isolated acetogenins existed in bark, stem bark, flower, and leaf of M. velutina species and they were new compounds except for goniothalamusin (158). The most striking feature is that these isolated compounds were able to form up to one or two triple bonds in a long aliphatic side chain terminated by γ-hydroxy (or γ-methoxyl)-γ-lactone unit, methyl group, or double bond.

Earlier phytochemical report by Jumana and coauthors (2000) showed that acetogenins A-B (145-146) obtained from Bangladeshis M. velutina species reached up to 0.00154% and 0.008% of extract weight, respectively [5]. However, NMR data of long alkyl side chain of these two compounds remain unknown. Paying attention to the result of phytochemical study on n-hexane extract of Thai M. velutina stem bark, based on repeating chromatographic columns on silica gel and sequential LiChrosorb RP-18 column techniques, we found that eight new compounds, alphabetically named cananginones A-I (147-155), have been successfully isolated as colorless viscous liquids [40]. Taking cananginone A (147) as an example, this new C23 linear olefinic acetogenin is accompanied by a variety of significant chemical shifts [(γ-methoxyl)-γ-lactone] unit established at 179.6 (C-1), 39.2 (C-2), 30.4 (C-21), 76.7 (C-22), 74.3 (C-23), and 59.5 (C-24); two double bonds and two triple bonds occurring at 65.1-146.6 ppm] [40]. Additionally, the positive OR value of +17.4 (c 0.206, CHCl3) evidently confirmed 2R,22S-configuration compared with that of goniothalamusin (158) [+14.6 (c 0.206, CHCl3)] [40].

Miliusolide and its dihydro derivatives 156-157 were also new derivatives of acetogenin detected in M. velutina stem bark [39]. Unfortunately, the trivial name ‘miliusolide’ was used for both metabolites 73 and 156 [30, 39].

In the light of phytochemical research, Wongsa and partners (2017) continuously provided the outcome relative to Thai M. velutina species (Figure 5) [38]. From n-hexane and ethyl acetate extracts of leaf of this plant, a rare class of eight bicyclic lactones with a C18 carbon backbone, trivially named velutinones A-H (161-168), were isolated. Similar to acetogenins, these compounds were collected with the physical property of colorless viscous liquids. Furthermore, they had shown the same feature in chemical structures, by which geranyl groups are located at carbon C-2a and the relative configuration at carbons C-2a and C-6a was syn-model (2aR,6aR). In general, it is worth concluding that olefinic acetogenins with terminated γ-lactone and 2-geranylated bicyclic lactones indicated a great crucial role in chemotaxonomic aspect to recognize M. velutina. Lactones in genus Miliusa were also found in M. balansae; the two known compounds curcolide (159) and serralactone (160) were two components of the leaf of this plant, collected from Vietnam [11].

3.6. Styryls

Most of secondary metabolites of interest to chemists pointed out that styryl derivatives were found in genus Miliusa. Styryls presented as the significant constituents of the two species M. balansae and M. velutina [31, 32, 38, 41]. As shown in Table 1 and Figure 6, the three mono-styryls 169-171 and the five bis-styryls 172-176 have been updated. It is worth noting that yangonin (171) was, for the first time, reported from genus Miliusa, while the seven remaining isolates 169 and 172-176 were reported to be new compounds in nature.

The shrub tree M. balansae is widely distributed in Vietnam and China; chromatographic examination of the polar extract of leaf and branch of this plant yielded the two new mono-styryls 3,4-dimethoxy-6-styryl-pyran-2-one (169) and (2E,5E)-2-methoxy-4-oxo-6-phenyl-hexa-2,5-dienoic acid methyl ester (170) [31].

Regarding isolated compounds of type bis-styryls, the general chemical structure was designated by cyclobutyl nucleus, while side chains were made up of phenyl rings, α-pyrone rings, and α,β-unsaturated ketones.

In order to identify bioactive constituents, phytochemical investigation has been carried out on methanol-water extract (95:5, v/v) of Vietnamese M. balansae leaf and branch, which continuously demonstrated the existence of two bulk new bis-styryls miliubisstyryls A-B (172-173). Although NMR data of 172 were not completely assigned, the key NOE evidence proposed that the relative configurations of 172 and 173 were identical, being trans-form for H-7/H-8 and H-7′/H-8′, together with cis-form for H-8/H-7′ and H-7/H-8′.

As mentioned above, M. velutina is a good reservoir of unique bicyclic lactones. From this plant, the three new bis-styryls velutinindimers A-C (174-176) were also separated [38]. According to this article, OR value approximately reached zero ( +0.08 (c 0.63, MeOH-CHCl3 3:1)] and no Cotton effect was observed in CD spectrum which can be responsible for the symmetrical property of velutinindimer A (174) (compound containing a symmetrical plane). Similarly, the combination of the assignments of 1H, 13C-NMR spectroscopic signals and the correlations in 2D-NMR data, as well as the most utilization of advantageous techniques such as the CD and X-ray measurements that considered velutinindimers B-C (175-176), were two racemic compounds and the relative configurations of these compounds were 5′S,6′R,7S,8S in compound 175 ( +0.08 (c 0.63, MeOH-CHCl3 5:1)) and 5′R,6′S,7R,8S in compound 176 ([α] +0.03 (c 0.23, MeOH-CHCl3 9:1)).

3.7. Terpenoids and Phenols

M. balansae species seems to be the most crucial objective in the contents of phytochemical researches related to plants of Miliusa species. Following the application of the variously chromatographic methods, norsesquiterpenoids of type megastigmanes, mono-phenols, and their glycosides have been determined as characteristics of genus Miliusa, especially M. balansae species. Eight terpenoids 177-185 and thirteen phenolic compounds 186-198 were summarized in Table 1 and Figure 7, which were newly isolated compounds or isolated for the first time from genus Miliusa [11, 25, 30, 32, 37, 42].

Herein, mono-saccharide units of type β-D-glucopyranosyl parts and disaccharides units of type α-D-apiofuranosyl-(1→6)-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl, β-D-apiofuranosyl-(1→6)-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl, β-xylopyranosyl-(1→6)-O-β-D-glucopyranoside, α-L-rhamnosyl-(1→6)-β-D-glucopyranosyl moieties are glycone parts linked to aglycones of terpenoids and phenols, whereas aglycones of phenols are mostly structurally formed by phenylethanoid nucleus.

Together with the one known terpenoid alangionoside B (177) and the four known phenolic glycosides cuchiloside (187), osmanthuside H (195), 1-(α-L-rhamnosyl-(1→6)-β-D-glucopyranosyloxy)-3,4,5-trimethoxybenzene (196), and 3,4,5-trimethoxyphenol-β-D-glucopyranoside (197), the phytochemical investigation of Chinese M. balansae species afforded one new megastigmane glycoside miliusoside C (182) and two new mono-phenols of type phenylethanoid glycosides miliusosides A-B (193-194) from 80% ethanol extract of dried stem [42]. The newly isolated compound 182 differed from its similar structure 177 in the orientation of D-apiosyl unit (α-form in 182 and β-form in 177).

In Vietnamese M. sinensis leaf and branch, 24-methylencycloartane-3β,21-diol (185) was the only triterpenoid reported to date, whereas the small-simple molecules 4-hydroxybenzonitrile (188), 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde (189), and isovanillin (191) were mono-phenols from M. velutina fruit [25, 32, 37].

Phytochemical analysis of methanol extract of Vietnamese M. balansae leaf has permitted the isolation and determination of the three new megastigmane glycosides milbasides A-C (179-181), in addition to the three analogs ampelopsisionoside (178), myrsinionosides A and D (183-184), and one glucosylated phenol 1-(3-methylbutyryl)phloroglucinol-glucopyranoside (192) [11]. Structures 179-181 shared the same E-geometrical shape of double bond outside; in addition, due to the negative Cotton effect at around 240 nm (Δε ranged from –1.73 to –3.27), the absolute configurations of 179-180 were 2R,3S,5S,6S, while compound 181 was proposed as 3S,5R,6R +3.27). In the same manner, chemical shift of methylene group of bis(2-hydroxyphenyl) methyl ether (186) was higher than that of hydroxymethyl alcohol by 8 ppm, implying that compound 186 was a new symmetrical ether [30].

This review updated a phytochemical result of M. mollis; the twig of this plant also contained the two phenolic glycosides icariside D2 (190) and tyrosol 1-O-β-xylopyranosyl-(1→6)-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (198) [24]. The highlight in phenyl ring of aglycone of new compound 198 corresponded to A2B2 spin system [ 7.10 (2H, d, J = 8.6 Hz, H-3 and H-5) and 6.95 (2H, d, J = 8.6 Hz, H-2 and H-6)], with glycone being remarked with two anomeric protons at 4.73 (1H, d, J = 7.3 Hz, H-1′) and 4.17 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz, H-1′′).

3.8. Amine, Amide, Alcohol Derivatives and Miscellaneous Types

A phytochemical survey conducted by Yu and partners (2009) pointed out that M. balansae leaf, collected from China, has also been composed of one amine adenine riboside (199), and two amide allantoin (200), and uridine (204) (Figure 8) [26]. Although these compounds are now available in the natural plants, they were isolated as single compounds from genus Miliusa for the first time. Utilizing silica gel (63-200 μm) and sephadex LH-20 columns in the chromatographic isolation, three tyramine derivatives, N-trans-caffeoyltyramine (201), N-trans-coumaroyltyramine (202), and N-trans-feruloyltyramine (203), have been purified from acetone of M. cuneata air-dried twig [7]. Since then, acetone extract of M. thorelii stem and root was demonstrated to contain two isolates, 201 and 203 too [8].

Vietnamese M. balansae species might have been considered as a rich resource of diverse compounds. Based on the evidence of phytochemical findings and NMR explanations, six well-known alcohol derivatives, 205-210, were further obtained from the leaf of this plant for the first time [11]. Among them, β-D-glucopyranoside (Z)-3-hexenol (205) was a glycosylation of long n-alkyl side chain alcohol, while the five remaining ones 206-210 were categorized as two pairs of erythro and threo isomers of glycerols and one other glucosylated glycerol. They were erythro-guaiacylglycerol (206), threo-guaiacylglycerol (207), erythro-1-C-syringylglycerol (209), threo-1-C-syringylglycerol (210), and (L)-guaiacyl glycerol 2′-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (208), respectively. There were also records of these compounds from genus Miliusa for the first time. As can be seen, the difference of chemical components from Vietnamese and Chinese M. balansae species has been depending on geographic factor more often.

Besides the presence of the rare compounds of type homogentisic acid derivatives, the ethyl acetate extract of air-dried M. velutina fruit also consisted of furfural derivatives, in which three small molecules, 5-acetyloxymethylfurfural (211), 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (212), and 5-methoxyfurfural (213), were isolated [32]. Despite the fact that these compounds were formulated with a simple pattern, they were recorded from the plants of genus Miliusa for the first time.

As shown in Figure 9 and Table 1, the common chemical compounds of type phytosterols can be found in several Miliusa plants. For instance, M. balansae stem was reported to contain β-sitosterol (216), and its glucoside (217), or stigmasterol (219); this one turned out to be one of the components from both M. sinensis leaf and branch and M. velutina fruit and flower [25, 32].

Chromatographic separation of the extracts from M. balansae stem also led to the isolation and determination of two mono-saccharide D-glucose (214) and sucrose (220) whereas M. balansae leaf and branch were accompanied by the existence of fatty acid octacosanoic acid (215) and benzoate sodium (218) [26, 32, 41].

3.9. Essential Oils

For a long time, there have been researches related to essential oils, which have frequently played an important role and been regarded as a branch of either phytochemistry or pharmacological products findings [1]. Many studies focused on the applications providing multifunction in healthcare problems, alternative medicines, food and drink manufacturers, or household cleaning products. Normally, the distillation method, often by using water steam, is a prompt and efficacious way; in addition, the extractions of solvent or florasols have always been used depending on the raw materials. The systematic GC and GC-MS techniques are usually being used to identify volatile individuals. Miliusa species are also among the largest sources of this specific chemical compound. In the review of all circumstances, following the results of ethno-geographic distribution, species property, part use, extraction method, and GC-MS technical analysis, the results of studying essential oils of Miliusa species were compiled in Table 2.

Essential oils studies on Miliusa plants are quite limited. There have been only three reports to date. Among forty-six members identified from essential oils of fresh leaf of, Quang Binh, Vietnamese M. baillonii species, the main constituent Z-citral reached the highest amount of 41.2% [28]. M. sinensis species, collected from Nghe An, Vietnam, is also likely to be a rich resource of essential oils. From this plant, 67.1% of a total of 95.1% of essential oils were sesquiterpene hydrocarbons [29]. Significantly, α-humulene and β-caryophyllene could be seen as the main components of oils of these two Vietnamese Miliusa plants (Table 2). In the same manner, the properties of plants, environmental factors, and collection time accounted for the differential components in essential oils of three, Queensland, Australian Miliusa plants, M. brahei, M. horsfieldii, and M. traceyi [27]. As can be seen from Table 2, these three species yielded oils, in which terpenoids predominated. α-Humulene, β-caryophyllene, and bicyclogermacrene achieved more than 10% of oils of M. brahei, while the major sesquiterpene of type caryophyllene derivatives ranged from 12% to 20%, present in M. horsfieldii oils; the highest components in oils of last plant M. traceyi encountered were the two isomers α- and β-pinene (approximately 19%). Of particular interest, β-caryophyllene was found to be one of the main compounds in all the five species (Table 2), which accounted for 10% to 20% of oils of Miliusa species.

4. Pharmacological Activities

4.1. Cytotoxic Activity

The plants of genus Miliusa included sets of variously useful isolated components to the 得 experimentally cytotoxic targets. In the review of all conditions, the cytotoxic results were briefly summarized in Table 3. Earlier report in 2000 by Jumana and partners mentioned the cytotoxicity of constituents from M. velutina species; the LC90 results of tested compounds may run as acetogenin A (145) (LC 7.1 μg/mL) > acetogenin B (146) (LC 14.1 μg/mL) > positive control vincristine (LC 15.0 μg/mL) > goniothalamusin (158) (LC 20.0 μg/mL) [5]. Nine new acetogenins cananginones A-I (147-155) were found to possess the weak IC values of 16.6-129.7 μM or be inactive in the cytotoxic assay against three cancer cell lines KB, MCF7, and NCI-H187, when compared to those of reference compound doxorubicin (IC 0.46-1.05 μM) [40].

NoInhibitory concentrations (cell lines)References

Isolated compound

12IC 2.89 μg/mL (MCF-7), IC 6.66 μg/mL (LU), IC 5.23 μg/mL (Hep-G2) and IC 2.30 μg/mL (KB)[37]

18-22Inactive (KB and Vero)[7]

33IC 26.5 μg/mL (KB), IC 32.7 μg/mL (MCF-7), IC 5.8 μg/mL (NCI-H187) and IC 6.3 μg/mL (Vero)[32]

34IC 11.8 μg/mL (KB), IC > 50.0 μg/mL (MCF-7), IC 6.1 μg/mL (NCI-H187) and IC 17.7 μg/mL (Vero)[32]

35IC 9.3 μg/mL (KB), IC 3.6 μg/mL (MCF-7), IC 40.4 μg/mL (NCI-H187) and IC 39.1 μg/mL (Vero)[32]

36IC 11.9 μg/mL (KB), IC 23.2 μg/mL (MCF-7), IC 6.1 μg/mL (NCI-H187) and IC 16.1 μg/mL (Vero)[32]

37IC 17.9 μg/mL (KB), IC 26.4 μg/mL (MCF-7), IC 6.2 μg/mL (NCI-H187) and IC 5.8 μg/mL (Vero)[32]

38IC > 50.0 μg/mL (KB, MCF-7, NCI-H187, Vero)[32]

39IC > 50.0 μg/mL (KB, MCF-7, NCI-H187, Vero)[32]

40IC 1.18 μg/mL (KB), IC 2.02 μg/mL (Lu1), IC 1.56 μg/mL (Col2), IC 3.18 μg/mL (LNCaP), IC 3.58 μg/mL (MCF-7), IC 2.89 μg/mL (HUVEC), IC 0.32 μg/mL (HL60), IC 2.70 ± 0.09 μM (HCT116), IC 1.67 ± 0.11 μM (A375) and IC 6.97 ± 0.16 μM (A549)[13, 14]

41IC 1.40 μg/mL (KB), IC 2.86 μg/mL (Lu1), IC 2.92 μg/mL (Col2), IC 5.06 μg/mL (LNCaP), IC 2.23 μg/mL (MCF-7), IC 1.79 μg/mL (HUVEC), IC 0.45 μg/mL (HL60), IC 3.50 ± 0.02 μM (HCT116), IC 3.70 ± 0.11 μM (A375) and IC 4.36 ± 0.40 μM (A549)[13, 14]

42IC 5.45 μg/mL (KB), IC 5.80 μg/mL (Lu1), IC 9.40 μg/mL (Col2), IC 19.64 μg/mL (LNCaP), IC 21.34 μg/mL (MCF-7), IC 6.55 μg/mL (HUVEC), IC 1.73 μg/mL (HL60), IC 17.2 ± 1.86 μM (HCT116), IC 9.86 ± 0.19 μM (A375) and IC 18.4 ± 0.35 μM (A549)[13, 14]

43IC 1.18 μg/mL (KB), IC 4.84 μg/mL (Lu1), IC 4.29 μg/mL (Col2), IC 5.06 μg/mL (LNCaP), IC 2.61 μg/mL (MCF-7) and IC 0.56 μg/mL (HL60)[14]

44IC 32.17 μg/mL (KB), IC 60.43 μg/mL (Lu1), IC 38.45 μg/mL (Col2), IC > 62.0 μg/mL (LNCaP), IC 15.78 μg/mL (MCF-7) and IC 18.66 μg/mL (HL60)[14]

45IC > 55.0 μg/mL (KB, Lu1, Col2, LNCaP and MCF-7) and IC 52.29 μg/mL (HL60)[14]

46IC 3.97 μg/mL (KB), IC 6.61 μg/mL (Lu1), IC 4.23 μg/mL (Col2), IC 5.29 μg/mL (LNCaP) and IC 4.76 μg/mL (MCF-7)[14]

47IC 5.82 μg/mL (KB), IC 6.16 μg/mL (Lu1), IC 3.70 μg/mL (Col2), IC 5.82 μg/mL (LNCaP) and IC 6.08 μg/mL (MCF-7)[14]

48IC 47.35 μg/mL (KB), IC 63.58 μg/mL (Lu1), IC 33.44 μg/mL (Col2), IC 43.38 μg/mL (LNCaP), IC 26.42 μg/mL (MCF-7) and IC > 10.9 μg/mL (HUVEC)[14]

49IC > 57.4 μg/mL (KB, Lu1, LNCaP), IC 46.01 μg/mL (Col2), IC 52.56 μg/mL (MCF-7), IC 13.3 ± 0.62 μM (HCT116), IC 7.24 ± 0.81 μM (A375) and IC 18.3 ± 2.54 μM (A549)[13, 14]

50/51IC 5.22 μg/mL (KB), IC 21.44 μg/mL (Lu1), IC 8.03 μg/mL (Col2), IC 29.56 μg/mL (LNCaP), IC 5.03 μg/mL (MCF-7) and IC 3.28 μg/mL (HL60)[14]

52/53IC 54.97 μg/mL (KB), IC 9.31 μg/mL (Lu1), IC 13.43 μg/mL (Col2), IC 51.82 μg/mL (LNCaP) and IC 12.18 μg/mL (MCF-7)[14]

54/55IC 5.28 μg/mL (KB), IC 7.46 μg/mL (Lu1), IC 5.36 μg/mL (Col2), IC 27.62 μg/mL (LNCaP), IC 10.06 μg/mL (MCF-7), IC 3.30 ± 0.06 μM (HCT116), IC 3.38 ± 0.09 μM (A375) and IC 10.4 ± 0.32 μM (A549)[13, 14]

56IC 6.11 μg/mL (KB), IC 19.94 μg/mL (Lu1), IC 3.89 μg/mL (Col2), IC 6.11 μg/mL (LNCaP) and IC 6.39 μg/mL (MCF-7)[14]

57IC 6.71 μg/mL (KB), IC 14.94 μg/mL (Lu1), IC 9.48 μg/mL (Col2), IC 23.95 μg/mL (LNCaP), IC 10.99 μg/mL (MCF-7), IC 4.20 ± 0.30 μM (HCT116), IC 4.25 ± 0.05 μM (A375) and IC 20.8 ± 1.24 μM (A549)[13, 14]

58IC 3.07 μg/mL (KB), IC 1.82 μg/mL (Lu1), IC 2.26 μg/mL (Col2), IC 2.41 μg/mL (LNCaP), IC 3.01 μg/mL (MCF-7) and IC 0.63 μg/mL (HL60)[14]

59IC 2.61 μg/mL (KB), IC 1.82 μg/mL (Lu1), IC 2.01 μg/mL (Col2), IC 1.73 μg/mL (LNCaP) and IC 2.26 μg/mL (MCF-7)[14]

60IC > 59.0 μg/mL (KB, Lu1, Col2, LNCaP and MCF-7) and IC 57.01 μg/mL (HL60)[14]

61IC > 65.0 μg/mL (HCT116, A375, A549)[13]

62/63IC 9.80 ± 0.51 μM (HCT116), IC 6.96 ± 0.23 μM (A375) and IC 24.3 ± 1.42 μM (A549)[13]

64/65IC > 52.9 μM (HCT116, A375 and A549)[13]

66/67IC > 55.0 μM (HCT116, A375 and A549)[13]

68IC 4.10 ± 0.13 μM (HCT116), IC 3.60 ± 0.33 μM (A375) and IC 7.15 ± 0.18 μM (A549)[13]

69IC > 57.5 μM (HCT116, A375 and A549)[13]

70IC 13.0 ± 0.17 μM (HCT116), IC 10.4 ± 0.66 μM (A375) and IC 24.5 ± 1.56 μM (A549)[13]

71IC 18.3 ± 0.59 μM (HCT116), IC 11.6 ± 1.45 μM (A375) and IC 18.0 ± 2.80 μM (A549)[13]

72IC 10.2 ± 0.1 μM (KB), IC 13.5 ± 0.5 μM (Vero), IC 2.00 ± 0.16 μM (HCT116), IC 1.50 ± 0.15 μM (A375), IC 2.45 ± 0.24 μM (A549), IC 1.18 μg/mL (KB), IC 1.64 μg/mL (Lu1), IC 1.35 μg/mL (Col2), IC 1.78 μg/mL (LNCaP), IC 3.09 μg/mL (MCF-7), IC 1.32 μg/mL (HUVEC) and IC 0.66 μg/mL (HL60)[7]; [13], [14]

75ED 3.6 μg/mL (P-388), ED 0.76 μg/mL (Col2), ED 0.68 μg/mL (MCF-7)
ED 16.08 μg/mL (ASK), ED 2.81 μg/mL (Hek293) and Inactive (KB, Lu-1 and T24)

76IC 4.6 μg/mL (KB), IC 0.93 μg/mL (Hep-G2) and IC > 5.0 μg/mL (RD)[35]

77IC 4.3 μg/mL (KB), IC 0.57 μg/mL (Hep-G2) and IC 2.09 μg/mL (RD)[35]

79 and 107IC > 128.0 μg/mL (MCF-7, LU, Hep-G2 and KB)[37]

83 and 87Inactive (KB and Vero)[7]

94> 5.0 μg/mL (KB and RD) and 1.5 μg/mL (Hep-G2)[35]

95IC 0.7 μg/mL (KB), IC 0.55 μg/mL (Hep-G2) and IC 3.01 μg/mL (RD)[35]

116Inactive (KB, MCF-7 and NCI-H187)[9]

119Inactive (KB and Vero)[7]

123IC 137.4 μM (KB), IC 169.1 μM (MCF-7) and IC 94.7 μM (NCI-H178)[10]

124IC 20.0 μg/mL (KB), IC 21.0 μg/mL (MCF-7) and IC 17.1 μg/mL (NCI-H178)[9]

125IC 17.9 μg/mL (KB), IC 28.4 μg/mL (MCF-7) and IC 15.9 μg/mL (NCI-H178)[9]

130IC 18.4 μg/mL (KB), IC 22.6 μg/mL (MCF-7) and IC 20.6 μg/mL (NCI-H178)[9]

131IC 12.9 μg/mL (KB), IC 45.6 μg/mL (MCF-7) and IC 16.7 μg/mL (NCI-H178)[9]

134IC 31.4 μM (KB), IC 56.2 μM (MCF-7) and IC 61.3 μM (NCI-H178)[10]

139IC 23.8 μg/mL (KB), IC 24.4 μg/mL (MCF-7) and IC 16.7 μg/mL (NCI-H178)[9]

140IC 27.2 μM (KB), IC 71.9 μM (MCF-7) and IC 95.3 μM (NCI-H178)[10]

141IC 95.9 μM (KB), IC 142.7 μM (MCF-7) and IC 115.9 μM (NCI-H178)[10]

143IC 14.4 μg/mL (KB), IC 13.0 μg/mL (MCF-7) and IC 12.7 μg/mL (NCI-H178)[9]

145LD 7.1 μg/mL[5]

146LD 14.1 μg/mL[5]

147IC 99.0 μM (KB), Inactive (MCF7) and IC 48.9 μM (NCI-H187)[40]

148IC 67.4 μM (KB), IC 93.7 μM (MCF-7) and IC 60.7 μM (NCI-H187)[40]

149IC 57.2 μM (KB), IC 84.8 μM (MCF-7) and IC 66.3 μM (NCI-H187)[40]

150IC 79.8 μM (KB), IC 126.3 μM (MCF7) and IC 61.1 μM (NCI-H187)[40]

151IC 45.2 μM (KB), IC 16.6 μM (MCF-7) and IC 70.2 μM (NCI-H187)[40]

152IC 33.9 μM (KB), IC 67.3 μM (MCF7) and IC 27.0 μM (NCI-H187)[40]

153IC 112.6 μM (KB), Inactive (MCF-7) and IC 66.7 μM (NCI-H187)[40]

154IC 59.9 μM (KB), IC 92.0 μM (MCF7) and IC 28.6 μM (NCI-H187)[40]

155IC 43.3 μM (KB), IC 129.7 μM (MCF-7) and IC 32.3 μM (NCI-H187)[40]

158LD 20.0 μg/mL[5]

161IC 4.0 μM (KB), IC 4.8 μM (MCF-7), IC 4.2 μM (NCI-H187) and IC 5.8 μM (Vero)[38]

162IC 9.6 μM (KB), IC 12.9 μM (MCF-7), IC 6.5 μM (NCI-H187) and IC 8.8 μM (Vero)[38]

163IC 12.9 μM (KB), IC 10.9 μM (MCF-7), IC 11.4 μM (NCI-H187) and IC 10.3 μM (Vero)[38]

164IC 10.5 μM (KB), IC 15.2 μM (MCF-7), IC 8.7 μM (NCI-H187) and IC 11.7 μM (Vero)[38]

166IC 14.5 μM (KB), IC 20.7 μM (MCF-7), IC 11.5 μM (NCI-H187) and IC 11.2 μM (Vero)[38]

167IC 24.1 μM (KB), IC 21.0 μM (MCF-7), IC 14.7 μM (NCI-H187) and IC 17.9 μM (Vero)[38]

168IC10.5 μM (KB), IC 11.9 μM (MCF-7), IC 6.8 μM (NCI-H187) and IC 18.2 μM (Vero)[38]

174-176Inactive (KB, MCF-7, NCI-H187 and Vero)[38]

201-203Inactive (KB and Vero)[7]

Plant extracts

n-Hexane extract of M. sinensisIC 86.6 μg/mL (MCF-7), IC 78.33 μg/mL (LU), IC 36.72 μg/mL (Hep-G2) and IC 82.04 μg/mL (KB)[37]

Ethyl acetate extract of M. sinensisIC 72.52 μg/mL (MCF-7), IC 75.09 μg/mL (LU), IC 42.50 μg/mL (Hep-G2)
And IC 59.13 μg/mL (KB)

n-Butanol extract of M. sinensisIC > 128.0 μg/mL (MCF-7 and KB)[37]

n-Hexane extract of M. smithiaeED 9.07 μg/mL (P-388), ED 12.0 μg/mL (KB), ED 8.53 μg/mL (Col2), ED 1.16 μg/mL (MCF-7), ED 11.98 μg/mL (Lu1), ED 13.31 μg/mL (T24), ED 11.6 μg/mL (ASK) and ED 6.74 μg/mL (Hek293)[36]

Ethyl acetate extract of M. smithiaeED 2.07 μg/mL (P-388), ED 5.45 μg/mL (KB), ED 1.98 μg/mL (Col2), ED 0.3 μg/mL (MCF-7), ED 5.85 μg/mL (Lu1), ED 3.29 μg/mL (T24), ED 3.83 μg/mL (ASK) and ED < 4.0 μg/mL (Hek293)[36]

Methanol and acetone extracts of M. smithiaeInactive (P-388, KB, Col2, MCF-7, Lu1, T24, ASK and Hek293)[36]

results derived from different models.

Huong and partners (2004b) pointed out four flavonoids, 75-76 and 94-95, from Vietnamese M. balansae plant not just to show their powerful capacities (IC < 5.0 μg/mL) in cytotoxic assay against the three cancer cell lines KB, Hep-G2, and RD, but also to emphasize that the introduction and modification of functional groups at carbon C-3, C-6, C-3′, and C-4′ were reasonable in the different results between pachypodol (95) and the remaining tested compounds 75-76 and 94 [30].

We then moved on to the demonstration of the proper agents from another Vietnamese medicinal plant, M. sinensis. n-Hexane and ethyl acetate extracts of this plant were moderately or weakly active against the four cancer cell lines MCF-7, LU, Hep-G2, and KB (IC 42.5-86.6 μg/mL); in particular, their secondary metabolite liriodenine (12) induced the strong IC values of 2.3-2.89 μg/mL towards MCF-7 and KB, but n-butanol extract and two isolated flavonoids, 3,5-dihydroxy-7,3′,4′-trimethoxyflavone (79) and 4′,6′-dihydroxy-2′,3′,4-trimethoxydihydrochalcone (107), did not show significant potency (IC > 128.0 μg/mL) [37]. Likewise, the weak-polar extracts of type n-hexane and ethyl acetate extracts of Thai M. smithiae species generally revealed moderate cytotoxic results in the experiment with eight cell lines, P-388, KB, Col-2, MCF-7, Lu-1, T24, ASK, and Hek293, but better than the inactivation of the polar extracts of type acetone and methanol extracts [36]. It is worthy of note that ethyl acetate part and its isolated flavonoid ayanin (75) against MCF-7 with the IC values of 0.3-0.68 μg/mL were comparable to positive control ellipticine (IC 0.37 μg/mL) [36].

In a comparison between new dihydrobenzofuran neolignan 3′ methoxymiliumollin (134) and its analogs decurrenal (123), miliumollin (140), and miliumollinone (141) in the cytotoxic assay against the three cancer cell lines KB, MC7, and NCI-H187 (Table 3), methoxylation would lead to reducing the IC values but the modification of allyl group did not seem to be the way of positive signal [9]. In another case, with the same test to KB, MC7, and NCI-H187 cell lines, the cytotoxic activity of chemical constituents of M. fragrans induced a clear arrangement as follows: 7S,8R-8.O.4′-neolignan 143 (IC 12.7-14.4 μg/mL) > dihydrobenzofuran neolignan 131 (IC 12.9-16.7 μg/mL) > 7R,8R-7.O.3′,8.O.4′-neolignan 139 (IC 16.7-23.8 μg/mL) > 7S,8R-7.O.3′,8.O.4′-neolignans 124-125 and 130 (IC 15.9-28.4 μg/mL) > flavan 116 (inactive) [10].

Now, it is pretty noticeable that uncommon bicyclic lactones velutinindimers A-D and F-H (161-164 and 166-168) gave rise to a range of the IC values from 4.0 μM to 24.1 μM in inhibiting three cancer cell lines, KB, MCF-7, and NCI-H187, and Vero cell line, while three new styryl derivatives 174-176 failed to do so [38]. As discussed above, leaf of M. cuneata was renowned as a reservoir of the diverse classes of secondary metabolites, but there has been a discrepancy between them in the cytotoxic assay [7]. In detail, either alkaloids, amides, flavonoids, or lignans inactivated towards two cell lines, KB and Vero, only geranylated homogentisic acid (+)-miliusol (72) and took part in suppressing these two cell lines with the IC values of 10.2 ± 0.1 μM and 13.5 ± 0.5 μM, respectively.

Phytochemical studies on Miliusa plants have reached certain successes with isolating and identifying the presence of geranylated homogentisic acids, but more than ever, these compounds were further set to justify the cytotoxicity.

Isolated compounds 33-37 possessed the cytotoxic activities against the four cell lines KB, MCF-7, NCI-H187, and Vero with IC values in the range of 5.8-40.4 μg/mL, and the failure of the two compounds 38-39 (IC > 50.0 μg/mL) led to a hypothetical suggestion that the modification of double bond of geranyl unit would not be considered as a good method to promote the positive signal in assay [32].

Twenty-two homogentisic acid derivatives, comprising (+)-miliusate (40), (+)-miliusol (72), and serial (+)-miliusanes I-XX (41-60), have been screened by the cytotoxic assay with seven cancer cell lines, KB, Lu1, Col2, LNCaP, MCF-7, HUVEC, and HL60, and the results were briefly summarized in Table 2 [14]. It is worth mentioning that in structure-biology relationship, at the dose of 20.0 μg/mL, (+)-miliusane V (45) was reported to be a nontoxic compound (IC > 55.0 μg/mL) due to acetyl amide group. When comparing between (+)-miliusate (40) and (+)-miliusane IX (49), at carbon C-2, carbonylation was better than hydroxylation, but the opposite phenomenon was observed between (+)-miliusane VIII (48) and (+)-miliusol (72) since hydroxy group transferred into carbonyl group at carbon C-5. In accordance with the above results, hydroxylation, carbonylation, and epoxidation occurred at double bond of geranyl units of (+)-miliusanes X-XVII (50-57); the cytotoxicity did not enhance. Last but not least, γ-lactone ring opening, such as in compounds (+)-miliusanes XVIII-XIX (58-59), was shown not to render the cytotoxicity.

As part of the ongoing effort to improve the efficacy of miliusane derivatives, recently, nineteen isolated compounds, (+)-miliusate (40), (+)-miliusanes I-II, IX, XIV-XV, XVII, XXI-XXI (41-42, 49, 54-55, 57, 61-71), and (+)-miliusol (72), were continued to submit the cytotoxic assay with three cancer cell lines HCT116, A375, and A549 [13]. The results showed the positive signals when compounds 40-42, 54-55, 57, 68, especially (+)-miliusate (40), and (+)-miliusol (72) were demonstrated to be the most active with the IC values of 1.0-5.0 μM.

4.2. Anticancer Activity

Anticancer experiments have been so far designated as a consequence of cytotoxicity. With the GI values in the range of 0.03-4.79 μM, three geranylated derivatives of homogentisic acids, (+)-miliusate (40), (+)-miliusane I (41), and (+)-miliusol (72), showed the potential antitumor activities towards NCI-60 panel of human cancer cell lines, but were more active with HCT116 cell line [13]. In a comprehensive analysis, the main component of Miliusa plants, namely, (+)-miliusol (72), was highly recommended to anticancer drugs development. At the end of 21st day of in vivo anticancer treatment, this compound (20.0 mg/kg) induced the decrease in average size of excised HCT116 xenograft mouse tumor up to 72.7%, and the mechanism may be due to p21-dependent induction of cellular senescence rather than apoptosis [13].

4.3. Antimalarial Activity

With regard to antimalarial activities against Plasmodium falciparum strains TM4 and K1, the IC values established a consistent arrangement as follows: standard compound cycloguanil (IC 0.08 ± 0.01 μM and IC 31.0 ± 8.4 μM) > geranylated homogentisic acid (+)-miliusol (72) (IC 11.1 ± 2.0 μM and IC 9.1 ± 3.1 μM) > new oxo-protoberberine alkaloids 18-22, flavones 76 and 87, and amides 201 and 203 (IC 19.3-41.4 μM and IC 10.8-54.9 μM) > flavones 83 and 95, lignan 119 and amide 202 (inactive) [7]. It should be noted that among the four flavones 76, 83, 87, and 95, methylation at 5-OH and methoxylation at carbon C-6 can be responsible for promoting antimalaria, in contrast to the phenomenon dioxane-cyclization between two hydroxyl groups at C-3′ and C-4′, whereas hydroxylation and methoxylation at meta-position of caffeoyl unit induced the potential differences among the three amides 201-203.

In addition to antimalarial assay, two known isolated compounds 33-34 and new one miliusanone A (36) inhibited the growth of P. falciparum with the IC values of 3.3-3.9 μg/mL but better than those of analogs miliusanone A (37) (IC 5.2 μg/mL), miliusanal (35), and miliusanones C-D (38-39) (IC > 10 μg/mL) [32]. From these data, it was also concluded that among the four geranylated homogentisic acid derivatives 33-34 and 36-37, the number of ester groups in the structure seemed to be the main for the outcome.

Serial new acetogenins cananginones A-I (147-150 and 152-155) failed to inhibit P. falciparum except for cananginone E (151) (IC 24.4 μM) [40]. Comparing between the structure 151 and the close group of compounds 152 and 154-155, dihydroxylation of double bonds and methylene reduction would not be facilitated.

Three new bulk styryl derivatives, velutinindimers A-C (174-175), established better IC values in the range of 5.4-6.4 μM towards P. falciparum than new unique bicyclic lactones velutinones B-D, G, and H (162-164 and 167-168) (IC 7.3-10.0 μM) [38].

4.4. Antifungal and Antimycobacterial Activities

In the search for natural products against DNA repair mutant in the yeast strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the MeCOEt extract of M. CF. banacea root showed inhibited rad 52. top 1 (IC 2000 μg/mL), but failed to do so with rad 52 and rad+ (IC > 8000 μg/mL) [4]. In the meantime, new alkaloid 10-hydroxyliriodenine (7) and positive control camptothecin afforded the respective IC values of 72 μg/mL and >20 μg/mL in suppressing rad 52. top 1, being better than that of 10-methoxyliriodenine (14) (IC 113 μg/mL).

The MIC values ranging from 4.0 μg/mL to >128 μg/mL were the results when using chalcone pashanone (109) and flavanone 5-hydroxy-6,7-dimethoxyflavanone (110) against thirteen human pathogenic fungi, Candida albicans ATCC10231, Candida krusei ATCC6258, Candida lusitaniae ATCC42720, Candida tropicalis ATCC13803, Cryptococcus gattii R265, Cryptococcus gattii WM276, Cryptococcus neoformans JEC21, Cryptococcus neoformans ATCC36556, Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii H99, Aspergillus fumigatus ATCC16424, and Trichophyton mentagrophytes ATCC9533 [6].

The effect of new cananginones H-I (154-155) on fungal C. albicans has been shown to be associated with the IC values of 75.2 μM and 37.4 μM, respectively, but new acetogenins cananginones A-G (147-153) did not appear active [40]. Herein, the reason is opposite to antimalarial analysis when four structures 151-152 and 154-155 were considerably compared.

The global health problem in developing countries is becoming increasingly involved in growing and expanding of microbacteria. Historical records have accumulated evidence showing that the use of traditional antibiotics, which are derived from synthetic substances, is always accompanied by a long duration of treatment, high cost, and drug resistance [48]. Therefore, calls for new antibiotic drugs from natural sources in the fight against multidrug-resistant bacteria are always strategy.

In a short communication, various components from M. tomentosa species suppressed the growth of several kinds of bacteria and fungi, but the most significant finding is that leaf volatile oil extract reduced the growth of bacterium Bacillus subtilis NCIM 2250 and fungal C. albicans NCIM 3471 with the same MIC value of 0.62 mg/mL, being better than those of leaf aqueous extract (2.5 mg/mL and 5.0 mg/mL, respectively) [49].

Acetogenin A (145) and goniothalamusin (158) are associated with the moderate antibacterial activity with diameters of the inhibitory zone of 9-14 mm against positive Gram bacteria Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococcus β-haemolyticus and 9-11 nm against negative Gram bacteria Salmonella typhi, Shigella flexneri, and Shigella dysenteriae, whereas acetogenin A (146) only influenced B. cereus with diameter zone of 11 mm [5].

The MIC values ranged from 32.0 to 64.0 μg/mL, which were the moderate antibacterial result of two geranylated homogentisic acids, 33 and 35, repellent positive Gram bacteria B. cereus DMST 5040, S. aureus DMST 8013, and methicillin resistant S. aureus. Meanwhile, two other geranylated homogentisic acids, 34 and 36, and two styryls, 171 and 175, were only found to be associated with the MIC values of 64.0-128.0 μg/mL against B. cereus DMST 5040 [32]. It was, therefore, concluded that geranylated homogentisic acids seemed to be better candidates for this problem rather than styryl derivatives.

At the same time, compound 33 revealed the MIC value of 50 μg/mL to treat Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Ra compared with that of the similar structures 34-39 (MIC > 50 μg/mL) [32]. Apparently, substituting groups R1 and R2 demonstrated the great role affecting the results.

Two unique bicyclic lactones, 161-162, resisted the growth of M. tuberculosis with the MIC values of 43.4 μM and 82.1 μM, respectively, but analogs 163-168 showed no activity. It is possible to note that epoxidation and hydroxylation would not be good circumstances to have positive signals in the activity [38].

4.5. Anti-Inflammatory Activity

Inflammation can be seen as a part of the complex biological response of the body tissues to harmful stimuli, such as irradiation, physical damage, metabolic overload, or infection [20]. Nowadays, modern diseases, for instance, cardiovascular and neurodegenerative disorders, are closely related to inflammation. Suppressing NO production is recognized to be a useful strategy for this problem.

On the screening of anti-inflammatory activity, by using mode of lipopolysaccharides (LPS) (1.0 μg/mL)-induced NO production in microglial RAW 264.7 cells, megastigmane glycosides milbasides A-C (179-181), alcohols β-D-glucopyranoside (Z)-3-hexenol (205), and (L)-guaiacyl glycerol 2′-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (208), at a concentration of 20.0 μM, together with flavan (−)-epicatechin (116) and megastigmane glucoside myrsinionoside D (184), at a concentration of 40.0 μM, indicated potent inhibitory activity comparable with or better than positive control sulfuretin (81.3 ± 4.9% at 20.0 μM) [11].

Because of glycosylation, NO inhibitory capacity compound 208 was generated 2.0-2.5 times higher than those of erythro- and threo-guaiacylglycerol (206-207) (48.4 ± 3.9%) [11].

4.6. Antiherpetic Activity

At the dose of 100 μg/mL, methanol extracts from stem and leaf of M. fragrans showed the IC values of 60-80 μg/mL in the antiherpetic experiment against HSV-1 and HSV-2. Meanwhile, in contrast to the inactive results of 116-118, 120-121, 124, 128-130, 135, 139, and 143-144, (+)-4-O-demethyleusiderin C (125) and licarin A (131) were found to possess the same IC values of 62.5-66.7 μg/mL (HSV-1) and 87.5 μg/mL (HSV-2) [9]. It was figured out that 7S,8R-7.O.3′,8.O.4′-neolignans should be the best choice for this model. Furthermore, by comparing 124-125 and 129-130, their antiherpetic outcomes closely depended on two functional groups, R1 and R2 (Figure 4).

4.7. Antioxidant Activity

Although phytochemical investigation of M. wayanadica species has not yet been performed extensively, its ethanol leaf extract was observed to be equivalent to or better than positive controls in antioxidant assays. For instance, in DPPH assay, the IC value of 465 μg/mL arising from M. wayanadica ethanol leaf extract was comparable with those of standard compounds BHT (570 μg/mL) and BHA (615 μg/mL); with regard to the ferric reducing antioxidant examination, the IC values for these three objects reached 600 μg/mL, 835 μg/mL, and 870 μg/mL, respectively [50].

4.8. Enzyme Acetylcholine Inhibitory Activity

To date, only one research dealt with the use of chemical constituents from M. thorelii species exploring the potency of Miliusa secondary metabolites in acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity. The results pointed out that alkaloids (the inhibitory capacity of new oxo-protoberberines 23-24 and known one 28 reached the significant range of 27.93%-50.17%) were promising agents rather than flavonoids (the inhibitory percentages of <10%-38.68% were for 80-83, 85-86, 88-91, 93, 95-99, and 101-102) or amides (tested compounds 201 and 203 were inactive, <10%) [32].

4.9. Cardiac Activity

Chrysosplenol C (77), a flavonol, isolated from M. balansae, proved to be an essential backbone to induce a positive inotropic effect on rat ventricular myocytes [12]. This compound caused the contractive percentage of ventricular cell and the active percentage of cardiac myosin ATPase up to 53.0 ± 4.07% at 50 μM and 28.1 ± 1.20% at 10 μM, respectively, compared with those of positive control omecamtiv mecarbil [59.3 ± 2.60% at 400 nM and 80.4 ± 2.89% at 10 μM, respectively] [12].

5. Conclusion

Taken together, Miliusa species have been fully researched in both phytochemical and pharmaceutical aspects, and a general view of the previous results has been outlined in the current paper. This review mostly focused on the knowledge about botanical description, phytochemistry, and biological evaluation. Basic findings might be concluded as below:(i) Miliusa plants are widely distributed in tropical and subtropical regions, particularly Asia mainland.(ii)Based on morphological analysis and the heavy support of DNA-barcoding techniques, the number of new Miliusa plants discovered increased more often. Up to present, approximately sixty species were identified.(iii)More than ten Miliusa species were highlighted in studying phytochemical and pharmacological aspects. Among them, Miliusa plants, collected from Vietnam, Thailand, and China, were major objectives for phytochemical investigations.(iv)A variety of secondary metabolites have been successfully isolated. In the current paper, we draw a list of twenty-two hundred isolated compounds. Chemical constituents derived from Miliusa have fallen into multiple classes of compounds, such as alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids, styryls, and lactones, but serial novel derivatives of geranylated homogentisic acid could be seen as biomarkers to recognize Miliusa species.(v)The geographic factors, environment, and collection time can be responsible for the difference in chemical components of each country. For instance, Thai M. mollis and M. fragrans plants established the high amount of lignans and neolignans whereas some Vietnamese Miliusa plants were characterized by the rich flavonoids, terpenoids, or miliusanes.(vi)Naturally occurring isolated compounds and plant extracts of this genus have been subjected to various pharmacological types, but cytotoxic assay seemed to be the main content of previous researches.(vii)It was also observed that the biological activation or inactivation of tested compounds closely depended on the key role of functional groups in the chemical structures.(viii)β-caryophyllene (10%-20%) was considered as major component in essential oils extracted from Vietnamese and Australian Miliusa plants.Finally, plant growing proposals, scientific assessments, and extensive phytochemical discoveries on this valuable source ought to be a willingness for drug leads and future pharmaceuticals. Bioactive compounds, in vitro and in vivo pharmaceutical analyses, clinical applications, and unknown mechanism explanations are expected.


HPLC:High performance liquid chromatography
GC-MS:Gas chromatography-mass spectrum
NMR:Nuclear magnetic resonance
OR:Optical rotation
CD:Circular dichroism
BHA:Butylated hydroxyanisole
BHT:Butylated hydroxytoluene
HSV-1 and HSV-2:Herpes simplex virus-1 and herpes simplex virus-2
MCF-7:Human breast carcinoma cell line
A549 and LU:Human lung carcinoma cell lines
Hep-G2, KB:Human oral epidermoid carcinoma cell line
Vero:Kidney epithelial cell line
NCI-H187, Col2, and HCT116:Human colon carcinoma cell lines
LNCaP:Human prostate carcinoma cell line
HUVEC:Human umbilical vein endothelial cell line
HL60:Human promyelocytic leukemia cell line
A375:Human melanoma carcinoma cell line
P-388:Human murine lymphocytic leukemia cell line
ASK:Rat glioma cell line
Hek293:Noncancerous human embryonic kidney cell line
T24:Human urinary bladder cancer cell line.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.


This work was supported by a grant from Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Vietnam, 2019.


  1. N. The Son, “Secondary metabolites of genus pandanus - an aspect of phytochemistry,” Mini-Reviews in Organic Chemistry, vol. 16, no. 1, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. N. T. Son and A. I. Elshamymistry, “Flavonoids and other non-alkaloidal constituents of genus erythrina: a detailed account of phytochemical review,” Current Organic Chemistry, vol. 23, no. 1, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. T. Chaowasku and P. J. Kessler, “Miliusa cambodgensis sp. nov. (Annonaceae) from Cambodia and M. astiana, M. ninhbinhensis spp. nov. from Vietnam,” Nordic Journal of Botany, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 298–307, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. T. Chaowasku and P. J. A. Kessler, “Isolation of bioactive and other oxoaporphine alkaloids from two annaceous plants, Xylopia aethiopica and Miliusa CF. banacea,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 68–73, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. S. Jumana, C. M. Hasan, and M. A. Rashid, “Antibacterial activity and cytotoxicity of Miliusa velutina,” Fitoterapia, vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 559–561, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. W. J. Lee, J. S. Moon, Y. T. Kim, T. T. Bach, D. V. Hai, and S. U. Kim, “Inhibition of the calcineurin pathway by two flavonoids isolated from miliusa sinensis finet & gagnep,” Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 1696–1700, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. T. Promchai, A. Jaidee, S. Cheenpracha et al., “Antimalarial oxoprotoberberine alkaloids from the leaves of Miliusa cuneata,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 978–983, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. T. Promchai, T. Saesong, K. Ingkaninan, S. Laphookhieo, S. G. Pynef, and T. Limtharakul, “Acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity of chemical constituents isolated from Miliusa thorelii,” Phytochemistry Letters, vol. 23, pp. 33–37, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. K. Sawasdee, T. Chaowasku, V. Lipipun, T. Dufat, S. Michel, and K. Likhitwitayawuid, “New neolignans and a lignan from Miliusa fragrans, and their anti-herpetic and cytotoxic activities,” Tetrahedron Letters, vol. 54, no. 32, pp. 4259–4263, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. K. Sawasdee, T. Chaowasku, V. Lipipun, T. Dufat, S. Michel, and K. Likhitwitayawuid, “Neolignans from leaves of Miliusa mollis,” Fitoterapia, vol. 85, pp. 49–56, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. N. P. Thao, B. T. T. Luyen, B. H. Tai et al., “Chemical constituents of Miliusa balansae leaves and inhibition of nitric oxide production in lipopolysaccharide-induced RAW 264.7 cells,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 25, pp. 3859–3863, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  12. E. Venkateswararao, M. J. Son, N. Sharma et al., “Exploration of pharmacophore in chrysosplenol C as activator in ventricular myocyte contraction,” ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 6, pp. 758–763, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  13. X. Xu, S. W. Tsang, Y. Guan et al., “In vitro and in vivo antitumor effects of plant-derived miliusanes and their induction of cellular senescence,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 1541–1561, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. H. Zhang, C. Ma, N. V. Hung et al., “Miliusanes, A class of cytotoxic agents from Miliusa sinensis,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 693–708, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. “Genus Miliusa,” 2019, http://www.theplantlist.org/. View at: Google Scholar
  16. T. Chaowasku and P. A. Kessler, “Seven new species of Miliusa (Annonaceae) from Thailand,” Nordic Journal of Botany, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 680–699, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. A. Damthongdee and T. Chaowasku, “Miliusa chantaburiana (Annonaceae), a new species from SE Thailand,” Willdenowia, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 293–401, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. A. K. Goel and S. C. Sharma, “A new species of Miliusa (Annonaceae) from Andaman Islands, India,” Nordic Journal of Botany, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 629–631, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. J. Mols and P. Kessler, “The genus Miliusa (Annonaceae) in the Austro-Malesian area,” Blumea - Biodiversity, Evolution and Biogeography of Plants, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 421–462, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. N. T. Son, “A review on the medicinal plant Dalbergia odorifera species: phytochemistry and biological activity,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2017, Article ID 7142370, 27 pages, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. B. Chen, C. Feng, B. Li, and G. Zhang, “Two new alkaloids from Miliusa cuneata,” Natural Product Research (Formerly Natural Product Letters), vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 397–402, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. C. M. Hasan, S. Jumana, and M. A. Rashid, “(+)-Isocorydine α- N −oxide: a new aporphine alkaloid from Miliusa velutina,” Natural Product Research (Formerly Natural Product Letters), vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 393–397, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. S. Jumana, C. M. Hasan, and M. A. Rashid, “Alakaloids from the stem bark of Miliusa velutina,” Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 483–485, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. K. Sawasdee, T. Chaowasku, and K. Likhitwitayawuid, “New neolignans and a phenylpropanoid glycoside from twigs of Miliusa mollis,” Molecules, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 639–648, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. T. T. T. Thuy and N. T. H. Anh, “Study on chemical constituents and biogical activities of Miliusa sinensis Fitnet et Gagnep., (Annonaceae),” Vietnam Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 48, pp. 81–87, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  26. L. Yu, W. L. Jun, B. Dan, S. J. Wei, and T. P. Fei, “Isolation and identification of chemical constituents from stems of Miliusa balansae,” Journal of Shenyang Pharmaceutical University (Abbreviation: Shenyang Yao Ke Da Xue Xue Bao), vol. 26, pp. 104–107, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  27. J. J. Brophy, R. J. Goldsack, and P. I. Forster, “The leaf oils of the australian species of Miliusa (Annonaceae),” Journal of Essential Oil Research, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 253–255, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. T. M. Hoi, D. N. Dai, T. D. Thang, and N. X. Dung, “Chemical composition of the essential oil of Miliusa baillonii Pierre (Annonaceae) from Vietnam,” Vietnam Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 60–63, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  29. T. D. Thang, D. N. Dai, B. V. Thanh, D. M. Dung, and I. A. Ogunwande, “Study on the chemical constituents of essential oils of two annonaceae plants from Vietnam: Miliusa sinensis and Artabotrys taynguyenensis,” American Journal of Essential Oils and Natural Products, vol. 1, pp. 24–28, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  30. D. T. Huong, C. Kamperdick, and T. V. Sung, “Homogentisic acid derivatives from Miliusa balansae,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 445–447, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. C. Kamperdick, N. Hong Van, and T. Van Sung, “Constituents from Miliusa balansae (Annonaceae),” Phytochemistry, vol. 61, no. 8, pp. 991–994, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. T. Promgool, K. Kanokmedhakul, S. Tontapha et al., “Bioactive homogentisic acid derivatives from fruits and flowers of Miliusa velutina,” Fitoterapia, vol. 134, pp. 65–72, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. K. Sawasdee, T. Chaowasku, V. Lipipun et al., “Geranylated homogentisic acid derivatives and flavonols from Miliusa umpangensis,” Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, vol. 54, pp. 179–181, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. R. Wu, Q. Ye, N. Y. Chen, and G. L. Zhang, “A new norditerpene from miliusa balansae finet et gagnep,” Chinese Chemical Letters, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 247-248, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  35. D. T. Huong, D. V. Luong, T. T. P. Thao, and T. V. Sung, “A new flavone and cytotoxic activity of flavonoid constituents isolated from Miliusa balansae (Annonaceae),” Die Pharmazie, vol. 60, no. 8, pp. 627–629, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  36. C. Naphong, W. Pompimon, and P. Sombutsiri, “Anticancer activity of isolated chemical constituents from Miliusa smithiae,” American Journal of Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 787–792, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. T. T. Thuy, T. D. Quan, N. T. Anh, and T. Van Sung, “A new hydrochalcone from Miliusa sinensis,” Natural Product Research (Formerly Natural Product Letters), vol. 25, no. 14, pp. 1361–1365, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. N. Wongsa, K. Kanokmedhakul, J. Boonmak, S. Youngme, and S. Kanokmedhakul, “Bicyclic lactones and racemic mixtures of dimeric styrylpyrones from the leaves of Miliusa velutina,” RSC Advances, vol. 7, no. 41, pp. 25285–25297, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. J. D. Connolly, S. Dagli, and M. E. Haque, “Constituents of the Annonaceae speices Miliusa velutina and Desmos longiforus,” Journal of the Indian Chemical Society, vol. 12, pp. 1169–1173, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. N. Wongsa, S. Kanokmedhakul, and K. Kanokmedhakul, “Cananginones A–I, linear acetogenins from the stem bark of Cananga latifolia,” Phytochemistry, vol. 72, no. 14-15, pp. 1859–1864, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. D. T. Huong, N. T. Van, C. Kamperdick, C. Kamperdick, N. T. Anh, and T. V. Sung, “Two new bis-styryl compounds from miliusa balansae,” Zeitschrift für Naturforschung B, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 335–338, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. Y. Lei, L. Wu, H. Shi, and P. Tu, “Three new glycosides from the stems of miliusa balansae,” Helvetica Chimica Acta, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 495–500, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. A. Y. Khan and G. Suresh Kumar, “Natural isoquinoline alkaloids: binding aspects to functional proteins, serum albumins, hemoglobin, and lysozyme,” Biophysical Reviews, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 407–420, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. P. Cabras, A. Angioni, C. Tuberoso et al., “Homogentisic acid: a phenolic acid as a marker of strawberry-tree (Arbutus unedo) honey,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 4064–4067, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. S. Wang, H. Li, L. Zhang, Z. Lin, and Y. Kuo, “Conversion of squid pen to homogentisic acid via paenibacillus sp. TKU036 and the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of homogentisic acid,” Marine Drugs, vol. 14, no. 10, p. 183, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. C. Phornphutkul, W. J. Introne, M. B. Perry et al., “Natural history of alkaptonuria,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 347, no. 26, pp. 2111–2121, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. V. Seidel, F. Bailleul, and P. G. Waterman, “Goniothalamusin, a linear acetogenin from Goniothalamus gardneri,” Phytochemistry, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 1101–1103, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. N. T. Son, M. Oda, N. Hayashi et al., “Antimicrobial activity of the constituents of Dalbergia tonkinensis and structural-bioactive highlights,” Natural Product Communications (NPC), vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 157–161, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. V. B. Badgujar and S. J. Surana, “Comparative investigation on antimicrobial property of Miliusa tomentosa leaf oil and leaf extract,” Iranian Journal of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 7–10, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  50. P. Favaz, P. A. Thomas, D. G. Thomas Parambi, K. B. Anil, A. Baby, and N. Rajan, “Histological evaluation, antioxidant and cytotoxic studies of Miliusa wayanadica,” IOSR Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Sciences, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 50–60, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Ninh The Son. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

993 Views | 397 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.