Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Education Research International
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 948138, 12 pages
Research Article

Critical Concerns for Oral Communication Education in Alabama and Beyond

Department of Communication, Alabama State University, Montgomery, AL 36104, USA

Received 23 August 2010; Revised 25 October 2010; Accepted 30 November 2010

Academic Editor: Eric Z. F. Liu

Copyright © 2011 Richard Emanuel. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. H. Buckley, “Focus on research: we listen a book a day; speak a book a week: learning from walter loban,” Language Arts, vol. 69, pp. 622–626, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  2. R. Emanuel, J. Adams, K. Baker et al., “How college students spend their time communicating,” International Journal of Listening, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 13–28, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  3. “Career Projections to 2005: Fastest Growing Careers,” U.S. Department of Labor Report. Chevy Chase, Md, USA, 1995.
  4. S. P. Morreale, M. M. Osborn, and J. C. Pearson, “Why communication is important: a rationale for the centrality of the study of communication,” Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, vol. 29, pp. 1–25, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  5. S. Becker and L. R. V. Ekdom, “That forgotten basic skill: oral communication,” Iowa Journal of Speech Communication, vol. 12, pp. 1–18, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  6. G. Crawley and K. Klomparens, The 1997-98 MSU Ph.D. Alumni Survey, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Mich, USA, 2000.
  7. R. Diamond, “Curriculum reform needed if students are to master core skills,” The Chronicle of Higher Education, B7.
  8. T. W. Harrell and M. S. Harrell, “Stanford MBA careers: a 20-Year longitudinal study,” Graduate School Business Research Paper 723, Graduate School Business, Stanford, Calif, USA, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  9. V. Satir, Peoplemaking, Science & Behavior Books, Los Altos, Calif, USA, 2nd edition, 1988.
  10. R. K. Mosvick and R. B. Nelson, We’ve Got to Start Meeting Like This: A Guide to Successful Meeting Management, Park Avenue, Indianapolis, Ind, USA, 1996.
  11. R. M. Felder, D. R. Woods, J. E. Stice, and A. Rugarcia, “The future of engineering education: part 2. Teaching methods that work,” Chemical Engineering Education, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 26–39, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. L. Darling and D. P. Dannels, “Practicing engineers talk about the importance of talk: a report on the role of oral communication in the workplace,” Communication Education, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. L. Winsor, D. B. Curtis, and R. D. Stephens, “National preferences in business and communication education: a survey update,” Journal of the Association of Communication Administration, vol. 3, pp. 170–179, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  14. “Graduates are not prepared to work in business,” Association Trends, 4, June 1997,
  15. R. Murane and F. Levy, Teaching the New Basic Skills, Free Press, New York, NY, USA, 1996.
  16. D. N. McCloskey, “The neglected economics of talk,” Planning for Higher Education, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 11–16, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  17. N. L. Keating, D. C. Green, A. C. Kao, J. A. Gazmararian, V. Y. Wu, and P. D. Cleary, “How are patients' specific ambulatory care experiences related to trust, satisfaction, and considering changing physicians?” Journal of General Internal Medicine, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 29–39, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. “Patients consider dropping doctors who are poor communicators,” Center for the Advancement of Health, September 2009,
  19. T. H. Willett, “Reading the client: nonverbal communication as an interviewing tool,” in Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association, ERIC, Chicago, Ill, USA, November 1984.
  20. “Review of General Education Literature,” University of Hawaii General Education Project, 1996,
  21. “Report of the University General Education Committee June 30, 2008,” Mercer University, January 2010,
  22. “General education in the 21st century,” Tech. Rep., Center for Studies in Higher Education, University of California, Berkeley, Calif, USA, 2007,
  23. “Improving the Transfer of General Education Credit: Alternative Policies for Florida Public Postsecondary Institutions,” 2003,
  24. “HLC Reaccreditation Subcommittee Report Common Academic Experience: the general education curriculum,” University of Iowa’s Higher Learning Commission (HLC), February 2010,
  25. “Review of general education literature,” General Education Project, University of Hawaii, 1996,
  26. “Strong foundations: twelve principles for effective general education programs,” Prepared by participants in the Project on Strong Foundations for General Education, The Association of American Colleges, 1994,
  27. “What will they learn? A Report on General Education Requirements at 100 of the Nation’s Leading Colleges and Universities,” January 2009,
  28. “Reinventing Undergraduate Education: Three Years After the Boyer Report,” Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Menlo Park, Calif, USA, 2001.
  29. I. N. Engleberg, R. C. Emanuel, T. Van Horn, and D. L. Bodary, “Communication education in U.S. community colleges,” Communication Education, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 241–265, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. S. Morreale, L. Hugenberg, and D. Worley, “The basic communication course at U.S. colleges and universities in the 21st century: study VII,” Communication Education, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 415–437, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. “What is the AGSC?” February 2007,
  32. College Learning for the New Century, “A report from the National Leadership Council for Liberal Education & America's Promise,” p. 15, 2007,
  33. P. Terenzini, “U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics. Student Outcomes Information for Policy-Making, NCES 97-991, prepared for the Council of the National Postsecondary Education Cooperative Working Group on Student Outcomes from a Policy Perspective,” Washington, DC, USA, 1997.
  34. Commission on Colleges, “Southern Association of Colleges and Schools,” January 2010,
  35. Principles of Accreditation, “Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges,” January 2010,
  36. Auburn University General Education Outcomes—Oral Communication, “Office of Undergraduate Studies,” October 2009, provost/undergrad_studies/oral_measures.html.
  37. “Objectives for ENG 1100. (n.d.) Auburn University Department of English,” August 2009,
  38. “Objectives for ENG 1100. (n.d.) Auburn University Department of English,” August 2009,
  39. University Learning Outcomes Assessment (UNILOA), “National Report of Means, 2008-2009. The Center for Learning Outcomes Assessment, Inc., Indiana State University, Terre Haute, Ind, USA,” October 2010,
  40. Central Alabama Community College 2009–2011, February 2010,
  41. “Jefferson State Community College 2010-2011 Catalog,” September 2010,
  42. “Gadsden State Community College 2009-2010 Catalog and Student Handbook,” February 2010,
  43. B. Lurleen, “Wallace Community College 2009-2010 Catalog,” February 2010,
  44. S. Fish, “What should colleges teach?” The New York Times Opinionator, October 2010,
  45. “Committee on Written and Spoken English,” Final Report, Washington University, St. Louis, Mo, USA, December 1998,
  46. “Specific Guidelines and Criteria for Courses Submitted in Communication Studies,” Alabama Articulation and General Studies Committee. Area II Guidelines, October 2010,
  47. E. Friedland, “Oral communication across the curriculum: what's a small college to do? Report of a collaborative pilot by theatre and education faculty,” Journal of General Education, vol. 53, no. 3-4, pp. 288–310, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  48. “FIPSE grant database—Saint Olaf College. 2000,” October 2010,
  49. R. Emanuel, “The case for fundamentals of oral communication,” Community College Journal of Research and Practice, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 153–162, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  50. Approved AGSC General Course Listings by Area, “Two-year institutions,” October 2010,
  51. “SPH106—Fundamentals of Oral Communication,” Course syllabus, 2004,
  52. “Policy Platform Statement on the Role of Communication Courses in General Education,” November 1996,
  53. S. J. Messman, “Communication and Technology in Action: Thoughtfully investigating the use of technology to enhance learning in the basic course. Panel presentation at the National Communication Association Convention,” New Orleans, La, USA, November 2002.
  54. R. Emanuel, “A regional analysis of communication education in U.S. community colleges,” American Communication Journal, vol. 10, no. 4, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  55. Faculty Credentials Guidelines, Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges, 2010,
  56. “Guidance on Determining Qualified Faculty (n.d.) Higher Learning Commission. A Commission of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools,” October 2010,
  57. Faculty Credentials Operations Manual 2008-2009, Hillsborough Community College, October 2010,
  58. Digest of Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Table 275, Bachelor’s, master’s, and doctor’s degrees conferred by degree-granting institutions, by sex of student and discipline division: 2006-2007, 2007,
  59. Community College Section, “Regional Summaries,” 2008,