Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Education Research International
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 242417, 7 pages
Research Article

Motivational Processes in Online Learning: The Role of Tutorship for Laboratory Activities through the Semistructured Self-Evaluation Tests

Department of Education, Roma Tre University, Via Milazzo 11 B, 00185 Rome, Italy

Received 17 November 2013; Revised 8 March 2014; Accepted 8 March 2014; Published 7 April 2014

Academic Editor: Gwo-Jen Hwang

Copyright © 2014 Valeria Biasi and Gaetano Domenici. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. Mourlas, N. Tsianos, and P. Germanakos, Eds., Cognitive and Emotional Processes in Web-Based Education: Integrating Human Factors and Personalization, Information Science Referente, Hershey, New York, NY, USA, 2009.
  2. R. Mayer, Multimedia Learning, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2001.
  3. A. Paivio, Imagery and Verbal Processes, Holt, New York, NY, USA, 1971.
  4. P. Chandler and J. Sweller, “Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction,” Cognition and Instruction, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 293–332, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  5. A. Calvani and M. Rotta, Fare formazione in internet. Manuale di didattica on line, Erickson, Trento, Italy, 2000.
  6. G. Domenici, Ed., Le prove semistrutturate di verifica degli apprendimenti, UTET, Turin, Italy, 2005.
  7. G. Domenici, Ed., Valutazione e auto-valutazione per la qualificazione dei processi formativi e-learning, Pensa Multimedia, Lecce, Italy, 2009.
  8. R. Trinchero, Valutare l’apprendimento nell’e-learning, Erikson, Trento, Italy, 2006.
  9. G. Trentin, Dalla formazione a distanza all’apprendimento in rete, Franco Angeli, Milan, Italy, 2001.
  10. R. Maragliano, Nuovo manuale di didattica multimediale, Laterza, Bari, Italy, 2004.
  11. M. Pellerey, Dirigere il proprio apprendimento, La Scuola, Brescia, Italy, 2006.
  12. B. J. F. Meyer, K. K. Wijekumar, and Y.-C. Lin, “Individualizing a web-based structure strategy intervention for fifth graders' comprehension of nonfiction,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 140–168, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. B. J. F. Meyer, K. Wijekumar, W. Middlemiss et al., “Web-based tutoring of the structure strategy with or without elaborated feedback or choice for fifth- and seventh-grade readers,” Reading Research Quarterly, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 62–92, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. P. Zaharias, “Usability in the context of e-learning: a framework augmenting 'traditional' usability constructs with instructional design and motivation to learn,” International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 37–59, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. N. Mammarella, C. Cornoldi, and F. Pazzagli, Psicologia dell’apprendimento multimediale, E-Learning e Nuove Tecnologie, Bologna, Italy, 2005.
  16. E. Magno Caldognetto and F. Cavicchio, Eds., Aspetti emotivi e relazionali nell’E-learning, Firenze University Press, Firenze, Italy, 2008.
  17. V. Biasi, P. Bonaiuto, and P. Cordellieri, “La componente estetica nella comunicazione didattica. Opportunità offerte dalle nuove tecnologie,” Tecnologie Didattiche, no. 1, pp. 4–13, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  18. P. Bonaiuto, V. Biasi, P. Cordellieri, and Esperienza estetica, “apprendimento e relazioni con la personalità,” in Verso una nuova qualità dell’insegnamento e apprendimento della Psicologia. II, P. Bisiacchi, P. Boscolo, N. de Carlo et al., Eds., pp. 101–111, Università degli Studi di Padova, Padova, Italy, 2007, View at Google Scholar
  19. B. G. Witmer and M. J. Singer, “Measuring immersion in virtual environments,” Tech. Rep. 1014, US Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Alexandria, Va, USA, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  20. G. Domenici, Istruzione a distanza, Juvenilia, Bergamo, Italy, 1990.
  21. V. Biasi, Processi affettivi e dinamiche della conoscenza, Guerini, Milano, Italy, 2010.
  22. P. Bonaiuto, “La fenomenologia delle motivazioni nel design per l’età evolutiva,” Rassegna di Psicologia Generale e Clinica, no. 8, pp. 36–65, 1967. View at Google Scholar
  23. J. P. Guilford, “Creativity,” American Psychologist, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 444–454, 1950. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. P. Guilford, Intelligence, Creativity, and Emotional Implications, Knapp, San Diego, Calif, USA, 1968.
  25. H. J. Eysenck, “Creativity and personality: suggestions for a theory,” Psychological Inquiry, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 147–178, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. Csikszentmihalyi, Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention, Harper Collins, New York, NY, USA, 1997.
  27. R. J. Sternberg, Ed., Handbook of Creativity, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1999.
  28. M. Runco, Creativity: Theories and Themes: Research, Development, and Practice, Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2007.