Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Education Research International
Volume 2014, Article ID 510342, 15 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/510342
Research Article

A Framework for Designing Training Programs to Foster Self-Regulated Learning and Text Analysis Skills

Department of Educational Research, Saarland University, Campus Building A 4 2, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany

Received 5 May 2014; Revised 25 June 2014; Accepted 9 July 2014; Published 10 August 2014

Academic Editor: Lieven Verschaffel

Copyright © 2014 Daniela Wagner et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. F. Perels, M. Merget-Kullmann, M. Wende, B. Schmitz, and C. Buchbinder, “Improving self-regulated learning of preschool children: evaluation of training for kindergarten teachers,” British Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 311–327, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Leidinger and F. Perels, “Training self-regulated learning in the classroom: development and evaluation of learning materials to train self-regulated learning during regular mathematics lessons at primary school,” Education Research International, vol. 20, pp. 1–14, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  3. F. Perels, T. Gürtler, and B. Schmitz, “Training of self-regulatory and problem-solving competence,” Learning and Instruction, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 123–139, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Siadaty, D. Gašević, J. Jovanović et al., “Self-regulated workplace learning: a pedagogical framework and semantic Web-based environment,” Educational Technology & Society, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 75–88, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  5. P. R. Pintrich, “The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning,” in Handbook of Self-Regulation, M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner, Eds., pp. 451–502, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  6. J. C. Núñez, R. Cerezo, A. Bernardo et al., “Implementation of training programs in self-regulated learning strategies in Moodle format: results of a experience in higher education,” Psicothema, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 274–281, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  7. A. C. Graesser, D. S. McNamara, and K. VanLehn, “Scaffolding deep comprehension strategies through Point&Query, AutoTutor, and iSTART,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 225–234, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. Azevedo, “Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 199–209, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. L. S. Fuchs, D. Fuchs, K. Prentice et al., “Enhancing third-grade students' mathematical problem solving with self-regulated learning strategies,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 306–315, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. L. Haag and E. Stern, “In search of the benefits of learning Latin,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 174–178, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. Sharoff, “Translation as problem solving: uses of comparable corpora,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Language Resources for Translation Work, Research & Training at LREC, Genoa, Italy, May 2006.
  12. L. Nota, S. Soresi, and B. J. Zimmerman, “Self-regulation and academic achievement and resilience: a longitudinal study,” International Journal of Educational Research, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 198–215, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. C. Dignath-van Ewijk and G. van der Werf, “What teachers think about self-regulated learning: investigating teacher beliefs and teacher behavior of enhancing students’ self-regulation,” Education Research International, vol. 2012, Article ID 741713, 10 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. B. van Hout-Wolters, R. J. Simons, and S. Volet, “Active learning: self-directed learning and independent work,” in New Learning: Three Ways to Learn in a New Balance, R. J. Simons, J. van der Linden, and T. Duffy, Eds., pp. 21–36, Kluwer, New York, NY, USA, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  15. K. J. Klauer, Transfer des Lernens. Warum wir oft mehr lernen als gelehrt wird [Transfer of learning. Why do we often learn more than we are taught?], Kohlhammer, Stuttgart, Germany, 2011.
  16. M. V. J. Veenman, L. Bavelaar, L. de Wolf, and M. G. P. van Haaren, “The on-line assessment of metacognitive skills in a computerized learning environment,” Learning and Individual Differences, vol. 29, pp. 123–130, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. B. J. Zimmerman and M. Martinez-Pons, “Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies,” The American Educational Research Journal, vol. 23, pp. 614–628, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  18. L. Corno, “Introduction to the special issue work habits and work styles: volition in education,” Teachers College Record, vol. 106, no. 9, pp. 1669–1694, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. P. R. Pintrich, C. Wolters, and G. P. Baxter, “Assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning,” in Issues in the Measurement of Metacognition, G. Schraw and J. C. Ampara, Eds., pp. 43–97, University of Nebraska, Buros Institute of Mental Measurements, Lincoln, Mass, USA, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  20. B. J. Zimmerman, “Attaining self-regulation: a social cognitive perspective,” in Handbook of Self-Regulation, M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner, Eds., pp. 13–39, Elsevier/Academic Press, Burlington, Mass, USA, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  21. B. Weiner, An Attributional Theory of Motivation and Emotion, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1986.
  22. R. Brooks and S. Goldstein, The Power of Resilience: Achieving Balance, Confidence, and Personal Strength in Your Life, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 2004.
  23. E. A. Nida and C. Taber, The Theory and Practice of Translation, E. J. Brill, Leiden, The Netherlands, 1969.
  24. E. Souvignier and J. Mokhlesgerami, “Using self-regulation as a framework for implementing strategy instruction to foster reading comprehension,” Learning and Instruction, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 57–71, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. Keip and T. Doepner, Interaktive Fachdidaktik Latein [Interactive Teaching Methodology for Latin Instruction], Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen, Germany, 2010.
  26. F. Perels, S. Bruder, R. Bruder, and B. Schmitz, “Erfolgreicher Mathematik lernen [Learning mathematics more successfully],” Praxis Schule, vol. 5, pp. 10–14, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  27. F. Perels, C. Dignath, and B. Schmitz, “Is it possible to improve mathematical achievement by means of self-regulation strategies? Evaluation of an intervention in regular math classes,” European Journal of Psychology of Education, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 17–31, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. B. Kramarski and M. Gutman, “How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical E-learning environments?” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 24–33, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. S. Graham, K. R. Harris, and L. Mason, “Improving the writing performance, knowledge, and self-efficacy of struggling young writers: the effects of self-regulated strategy development,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 207–241, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. R. A. LaFleur, “Latin students score high on SAT and achievement tests,” Classical Journal, vol. 76, no. 3, p. 254, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  31. A. K. de Vane, “Efficacy of Latin studies in the information age,” PSY 702: Educational Psychology, Valdosta State University, Valdosta, Ga, USA, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  32. P. Newmark, A Textbook of Translation, Prentice Hall, Hempstead, NY, USA, 1988.
  33. R. Azevedo, “Beyond intelligent tutoring systems: using computers as METAcognitive tools to enhance learning?” Instructional Science, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 31–45, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. S. Kistner, K. Rakoczy, B. Otto, C. Dignath-van Ewijk, G. Büttner, and E. Klieme, “Promotion of self-regulated learning in classrooms: investigating frequency, quality, and consequences for student performance,” Metacognition and Learning, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 157–171, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. E. de Corte, L. Verschaffel, and C. Masui, “The CLIA-model: a framework for designing powerful learning environments for thinking and problem solving,” European Journal of Psychology of Education, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 365–384, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. A. L. Brown, J. C. Campione, and J. D. Day, “Learning to learn: on training students to learn from text,” Educational Researcher, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 14–21, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  37. G. Schraw, “Promoting general metacognitive awareness,” Instructional Science, vol. 26, no. 1-2, pp. 113–125, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. T. J. Cleary and B. J. Zimmerman, “Self-regulation empowerment program: a school-based program to enhance self-regulated and self-motivated cycles of student learning,” Psychology in the Schools, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 537–550, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. C. Dignath, G. Buettner, and H. Langfeldt, “How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively? A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programmes,” Educational Research Review, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 101–129, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. B. Otto, Schüler-, Eltern- und Lehrertrainings zur Vermittlung effektiver Selbstregulation [SELVES. Student-, parent- and teacher trainings for the teaching of effective self-regulation] [Dissertation], Technische Universität, Fachbereich Humanwissenschaften, Darmstadt, Germany, 2007.
  41. P. C. Austin, “An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies,” Multivariate Behavioral Research, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 399–424, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. A. Bandura, Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control, Freeman, New York, NY, USA, 1997.
  43. T. Leard and A. F. Hadwin, “Log file analysis: a review of the literature,” in Log File Navigation Profiles and Analysis: Methods for Tracking and Examining Hypermedia Navigation, A. F. Hadwin, Ed., Symposium Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, American Educational Research Association, Seattle, Wash, USA, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  44. P. R. Pintrich, A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich, USA, 1991.
  45. M. V. J. Veenman, “Alternative assessment of strategy use with self-report instruments: a discussion,” Metacognition and Learning, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 205–211, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. M. V. J. Veenman, “The assessment of metacognitive skills: what can be learned from multi-method designs?” in Lernstrategien und Metakognition: Implikationen für Forschung und Praxis, C. Artelt and B. Moschner, Eds., pp. 77–99, Waxmann, Münster, Germany, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  47. W. H. Kruskal and W. A. Wallis, “Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 47, no. 260, pp. 583–621, 1952. View at Google Scholar
  48. K. Waeytens, W. Lens, and R. Vandenberghe, “Learning to learn: teachers' conceptions of their supporting role,” Learning and Instruction, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 305–322, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. M. Bannert, Metacognition and Learning with Hypermedia: Assessment, Description and Teaching of Effective Metacognitive Strategies and Regulation Activities, vol. 61, Waxmann, Münster, Germany, 2007.
  50. E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, “Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being,” The American Psychologist, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 68–78, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. R. E. Clark, “When teaching kills learning: studies of mathematantics,” in Learning and Instruction: European Research in an International Context, H. Mandl, E. de Corte, N. S. Bennet, and H. F. Friedrich, Eds., pp. 1–22, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  52. L. Maggioni and M. M. Parkinson, “The role of teacher epistemic cognition, epistemic beliefs, and calibration in instruction,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 445–461, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. B. Kramarski and T. Michalsky, “Investigating preservice teachers' professional growth in self-regulated environments,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 161–175, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. C. S. Carver and M. F. Scheier, Attention and Self-Regulation: A Control Theory Approach to Human Behavior, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1981.
  55. E. Aronson, T. Wilson, and R. M. Akert, Sozialpsychologie [Social Psychology], Pearson, München, Germany, 4th edition, 2004.
  56. M. Pressley, B. L. Snyder, and T. Cariglia-Bull, “How can good strategy use be taught to children?: evaluation of six alternative approaches,” in Transfer of Learning, S. Cormier and J. D. Hagman, Eds., pp. 81–120, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  57. C. Dignath and G. Büttner, “Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students: a meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level,” Metacognition and Learning, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 231–264, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. N. E. Perry, K. O. VandeKamp, L. K. Mercer, and C. J. Nordby, “Investigating teacher-student interactions that foster self-regulated learning,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 5–15, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. M. V. J. Veenman, “Assessing metacognitive skills in computerized learning environments,” in International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies, R. Azevedo and V. Aleven, Eds., pp. 157–168, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  60. M. V. J. Veenman, L. Bavelaar, L. de Wolf, and M. G. P. van Haaren, “The on-line assessment of metacognitive skills in a computerized learning environment,” Learning and Individual Differences, vol. 29, pp. 123–130, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. P. R. Pintrich and E. V. de Groot, “A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 667–686, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. M. V. J. Veenman, “The assessment and instruction of self-regulation in computer-based environments: a discussion,” Metacognition and Learning, vol. 2, no. 2-3, pp. 177–183, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus