Research Article
Effectiveness of Using Online Discussion Forum for Case Study Analysis
Table 4
Summary of analysis.
| Content analysis | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 |
| No evidence that the student read/understood others’ ideas/contributions | 56% | 44% | 54% | 34% | Responding to others contribution by elaboration/critique or building-up | 15% | 21% | 31% | 36% | Evidence of good analysis of the case study data | 32% | 41% | 39% | 44% | Evidence of using and citing other sources/references in the response | 17% | 18% | 21% | 24% | Demonstrable understanding of the questions and identification of issues in case study | 21% | 27% | 33% | 39% | Effective written communication | 64% | 72% | 56% | 71% | Evidence of pooling different ideas, expertise, and information in the development of an artifact (related to question 3 only) | NA | NA | 45% | NA |
|
|