Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Education Research International
Volume 2019, Article ID 1359362, 9 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1359362
Research Article

Peer Review of Manuscripts: A Valuable yet Neglected Educational Tool for Early-Career Researchers

1School of Chemical Engineering & Analytical Science, The University of Manchester, The Mill, Sackville Street, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
2Advanced Membranes and Porous Materials Center, Physical Science and Engineering Division (PSE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia

Correspondence should be addressed to Gyorgy Szekely; as.ude.tsuak@ylekezs.ygroyg

Received 26 January 2019; Accepted 20 May 2019; Published 4 June 2019

Academic Editor: Kirsi Tirri

Copyright © 2019 Robert McNair et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Wiley RANO Survey, Principles of Peer Review, Wiley Author Services, 2013, https://authorservices.wiley.com/asset/Principles_of_Peer_Review.pdf.
  2. Elsevier, The Publishing Research Consortium (PRC) Survey, How Researchers Really Feel About Peer Review, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2016, https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/205717/PeerReviewWeek2016_Infographic.pdf.
  3. G. McDowell, Early Career Researchers and their Involvement in Peer Review, ASAPbio, 2018, http://asapbio.org/mcdowell-ecrs.
  4. C. Tancock, Innovation in Peer Review: Introducing ‘Volunpeers’, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2018, https://www.elsevier.com/connect/reviewers-update/innovation-in-peer-review-introducing-volunpeers.
  5. ACS Reviewer LabTM, “Peer-review training for scientific researchers,” ACS Publications, Washington, DC, USA, 2018, https://www.acsreviewerlab.org/?utm_source=Reviewer%20Email&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Mentor%20Angle_Est%20Reviewers. View at Google Scholar
  6. J. Wilson, Peer Review–The Nuts and Bolts (A Guide for Early-Career Researchers), Sense about Science, 2012, http://senseaboutscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/peer-review-the-nuts-and-bolts.pdf.
  7. M. N. Ovando, “Constructive feedback: a key to successful teaching and learning,” International Journal of Educational Management, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 19–22, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. N. Sieroka, V. I. Otto, and G. Folkers, “Critical thinking in education and research—why and how?” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 57, no. 51, pp. 16574-16575, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. Morrison, How to Promote Critical Thinking with Online Discussion Forums, Online Learning Insights, 2013, https://onlinelearninginsights.wordpress.com/2013/10/01/how-to-promote-critical-thinking-with-online-discussion-forums/.
  10. P. J. Silvia, How to Write a Lot: A Practical Guide to Productive Academic Writing, American Psychological Association, Worcester, MS, USA, 2018.
  11. J. M. Swales and C. B. Feak, Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. K. J. Topping, E. F. Smith, I. Swanson, and A. Elliot, “Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students,” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 149–169, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. C. Coffin, M. J. Curry, S. Goodman, A. Hewings, T. M. Lillis, and J. Swann, Teaching Academic Writing: A Toolkit for Higher Education, Routledge, London, UK, 2003.
  14. J. Madraso, “Proofreading: the skill we’ve neglected to teach,” English Journal, vol. 82, pp. 32–41, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. A. Wallwork, English for Writing Research Papers, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2011.
  16. R. Coates, B. Sturgeon, J. Bohannan, and E. Pasini, “Language and publication in “cardiovascular research” articles,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 279–285, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. P. Olk and P. Rosenzweig, “The halo effect and the challenge of management inquiry: a dialog between Phil Rosenzweig and Paul Olk,” Journal of Management Inquiry, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 48–54, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. J. Herrera, “Language bias discredits the peer-review system,” Nature, vol. 397, p. 467, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers, 2017, http://www.publicationethics.org.
  20. J. van Harten, A Reviewer’s Guide to Ethics in Publishing, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2015, https://www.elsevier.com/reviewers-update/story/publishing-ethics/a-reviewers-guide-to-publishing-ethics.
  21. S. van Etten, M. Pressley, G. Freebern, and M. Echevarria, “An interview study of college freshmens’ beliefs about their academic motivation,” European Journal of Psychology of Education, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 105–130, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. N. A. M. Razali, M. S. Rusiman, W. S. Gan, and N. Arbin, “The impact of time management on students’ academic achievement,” Journal of Physics Conference Series, vol. 995, Article ID 012042, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. H. Kearns, M. Gardiner, and K. Marshall, “Innovation in PhD completion: the hardy shall succeed (and be happy!),” Higher Education Research & Development, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 77–89, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. L. R. Zientek, J. M. Werner, M. V. Campuzano, and K. Nimon, “The use of Google scholar for research and research dissemination,” New Horizons in Adult Education & Human Resource Development, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 39–46, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. Editorial, “The art of the revision,” Nature Chemical Biology, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 1, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus