Magic of Choosing Suitable Course Coordinator Based on Students’ Feedback: A Single Center Experience from Saudi Arabia

Table 4

Association and difference based on the level of study, that is, preclinical and clinical phase.

Phase		N	Mean	±	Std. dev	R	value
Phase II	Course coordinators rating as coordinator	65	3.69	±	0.85	0.893	<0.001
	Coordinators rating (as a teacher)	64	3.72	±	1.02
Phase III	Course coordinators rating as coordinator	28	3.62	±	1.01	0.985	<0.001
	Coordinators rating (as a teacher)	28	3.64	±	1.09
Phase II	Course coordinators rating as coordinator	65	3.69	±	0.85	0.868	<0.001
	Ave. evaluation (all domains)	65	3.52	±	0.57
Phase III	Course coordinators rating as coordinator	28	3.62	±	1.01	0.938	<0.001
	Ave. evaluation (all domains)	28	3.59	±	0.71
Phase II	Course coordinators rating as coordinator	65	3.69	±	0.85	0.526	<0.001
	Mean faculty rating	65	3.78	±	0.28
Phase III	Course coordinators rating as coordinator	28	3.62	±	1.01	0.693	<0.001
	Mean faculty rating	28	4.22	±	0.30
Phase II	Ave. evaluation (all domains)	65	3.52	±	0.57	0.927	<0.001
	Overall course evaluation	65	3.46	±	0.65
Phase III	Ave. evaluation (all domains)	28	3.59	±	0.71	0.965	<0.001
	Overall course evaluation	28	3.52	±	0.80

Correlation test: significant value. BC rating: rating of course coordinator as a coordinator.