Multiple Roles of SIRT2 in Regulating Physiological and Pathological Signal Transduction

Zhu, Changhui; Dong, Xue; Wang, Xiwei; Zheng, Yingying; Qiu, Juanjuan; Peng, Yanling; Xu, Jiajun; Chai, Zhengbin; Liu, Chunyan

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9282484

Genetics Research

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusion Data Availability Consent Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 9282484 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9282484

Multiple Roles of SIRT2 in Regulating Physiological and Pathological Signal Transduction

Changhui Zhu,^1,2Xue Dong,³Xiwei Wang,⁴Yingying Zheng,²Juanjuan Qiu,⁵Yanling Peng,⁵Jiajun Xu,⁵Zhengbin Chai,^6,7and Chunyan Liu²

Academic Editor: Muhammad Babar Khawar

Received16 Apr 2022

Revised01 Jul 2022

Accepted08 Jul 2022

Published29 Aug 2022

Abstract

Sirtuin 2 (SIRT2), as a member of the sirtuin family, has representative features of evolutionarily highly conserved nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+)-dependent deacetylase activity. In addition, SIRT2, as the only sirtuin protein colocalized with tubulin in the cytoplasm, has its own functions and characteristics. In recent years, studies have increasingly shown that SIRT2 can participate in the regulation of gene expression and regulate signal transduction in the metabolic pathway mainly through its post-translational modification of target genes; thus, SIRT2 has become a key centre in the metabolic pathway and participates in the pathological process of metabolic disorder-related diseases. In this paper, it is discussed that SIRT2 can regulate all aspects of gene expression, including epigenetic modification, replication, transcription and translation, and post-translational modification, which enables SIRT2 to participate in energy metabolism in life activities, and it is clarified that SIRT2 is involved in metabolic process-specific signal transduction mechanisms. Therefore, SIRT2 can be involved in metabolic disorder-related inflammation and oxidative stress, thereby triggering the occurrence of metabolic disorder-related diseases, such as neurodegenerative diseases, tumours, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases. Currently, although the role of SIRT2 in some diseases is still controversial, given the multiple roles of SIRT2 in regulating physiological and pathological signal transduction, SIRT2 has become a key target for disease treatment. It is believed that with increasing research, the clinical application of SIRT2 will be promoted.

1. Introduction

The silent information regulator (sirtuin, SIRT) family, also known as type III histone deacetylases (HDACs), are nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+)-dependent deacetylases that are highly conserved from bacteria to humans. To date, seven types of sirtuins have been identified in mammals (SIRT1-7), all of which have different functions and localizations in cells [1]. SIRT1, SIRT6, and SIRT7 mainly exist in the nucleus, where SIRT1 regulates transcription, chromatin modification, and energy metabolism, while SIRT6 and SIRT7 are related to DNA repair and rDNA transcription [2–4]. SIRT3–5 are localized in mitochondria, where they regulate oxidative stress and ATP production in response to caloric restriction [5]. The SIRT2 gene is located on autosomal chromosome 19q13.2, colocalizes with tubulin in the cytosol, and is distributed in metabolically active tissues, such as the liver, heart, skeletal muscle, and brain [6].

Studies have shown that SIRT2 can participate in the regulation of gene expression and regulate signal transduction in metabolic pathways through its post-translational modification of target genes [7, 8]. This paper mainly discusses the specific mechanism by which SIRT2 regulates gene expression in all aspects and through the post-translational modification of each target gene of synthetic metabolism and catabolism in lipid metabolism and glucose metabolism (mainly deacetylation) and directly or indirectly affects the transduction of metabolic-related signals (synergy, etc.), resulting in crosstalk between metabolic signalling pathways; thus, SIRT2 has become a key centre in metabolism. Therefore, SIRT2 can be involved in metabolic disorder-related inflammation and oxidative stress and participate in the pathological process of metabolic disorder-related diseases, rendering SIRT2 a target for the clinical treatment of diseases. This paper first elucidates the specific mechanism of SIRT2 in the correlation between gene expression regulation and metabolic pathway signal transduction to provide new ideas and methods for the treatment of diseases.

2. Roles of SIRT2 in Regulating Gene Expression

Gene expression refers to the synthesis of biologically active proteins from the genetic information carried by DNA sequences through replication, transcription, and translation. SIRT2 can regulate gene expression by participating in replication, transcription, translation, epigenetic modification, and post-translational modification.

2.1. SIRT2 Regulates Replication, Transcription, and Translation

At the replication level, on the one hand, after DNA damage, SIRT2 mainly recovers DNA replication from the stress state through ataxia telangiectasia-mutated and Rad3-related (ATR) kinase checkpoint. At sites of DNA damage, SIRT2 can deacetylate ATR-interacting protein (ATRIP) K32, thereby driving ATR activation through the binding of ATR-ATRIP to replication protein A-coated single-stranded DNA (RPA-ssDNA). Furthermore, SIRT2 can deacetylate CDK9 lysine 48 and partially depend on ATR to activate CDK9 kinase activity, promoting the recovery of DNA replication [9, 10]. On the other hand, SIRT2 maintains the activity of RNR by deacetylating the subunit RRM2 of ribonucleotide reductase (RNR), ensuring a sufficient supply of precursor dNTPs for DNA synthesis and promoting the progress of DNA replication [11].

At the transcriptional level, SIRT2 inhibits transcription through its deacetylation activity. In the transcription system of mouse cellular RNA polymerase I (Pol I), SIRT2 can deacetylate the TATA box-binding protein (TBP) factor TIF-IB/SL1 TAF_I68 and impair the binding of TAFI68 to rDNA promoters, resulting in rDNA transcription inhibition [12]. In addition, the interaction between SIRT 2 and the homeobox transcription factor HOXA10 was identified in human cells [13].

At the translational level, the most studied SIRT2 is eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A (eIF5A). SIRT2 can regulate the subcellular localization of eIF5A by regulating the acetylation level of eIF5A. The acetylated form of eIF5A is located in the nucleus, while unacetylated eIF5A is located in the cytoplasm, which enables it to perform different functions in different cell sites, and its specific functional mechanism remains to be studied [14–16].

2.2. SIRT2 Is Involved in Epigenetic and Post-Translational Modifications

After DNA replication, transcription, and translation, the synthesized protein is an inactive protein precursor that needs to undergo various post-translational modifications to become a protein with specific biological functions. Studies have shown that SIRT2 can participate in the epigenetic regulation of genes by the post-translational modification of histones, thereby indirectly regulating life activities within cells. SIRT2 can also directly participate in regulating intracellular life activities through the post-translational modification of nonhistone proteins. The details are shown in Table 1.

In summary, SIRT2 can lead to biologically active proteins through replication, transcription, translation, and epigenetic and post-translational modifications related to gene expression. This finding is consistent with Li et al.’s research, which showed that SIRT2 can target genes and proteins involved in the regulation of gene expression and metabolism and can target certain diseases [31, 32]. This finding suggests that SIRT2 can form crosstalk between gene expression regulation and metabolism and participate in the pathological process of disease.

3. Role of SIRT2 in Signal Transduction

3.1. SIRT2 and Lipid Metabolism-Related Signal Transduction

Lipid metabolism includes lipid uptake, synthesis, oxidation, and storage. The key regulatory factors include insulin, glucagon, and adrenaline. Insulin promotes the synthesis of triglycerides in the liver and the storage of triglycerides in white adipose tissue (WAT). Glucagon and adrenaline stimulate the fat decomposition in WAT and fatty acid oxidation in other tissues when nutrients are limited (Figure 1).

Figure 1

SIRT2 is involved in lipid metabolism. SIRT2 affects lipid synthesis through ACLY. P300/PCAF can stabilize ACLY by acetylation, thereby promoting lipid synthesis. SIRT2 degrades ACLY by deacetylation to inhibit lipid synthesis. SIRT2 promotes the binding of SREBP-2 to the SRE by promoting the nuclear translocation of SREBP-2, thereby promoting the transcription of cholesterol synthesis-related genes and ultimately promoting the synthesis of cholesterol. SIRT2 inhibits lipid synthesis by deacetylating HNF4α. SIRT2 promotes fatty acid oxidation and inhibits lipid synthesis by inhibiting the nuclear translocation of FOXO1. In addition, SIRT2 promotes fatty acid oxidation through the deacetylation of PGC-1.

3.1.1. Lipogenesis

Studies have shown that inhibiting the expression of SIRT2 can promote fat production. This process involves increasing the expression of many genes associated with adipocyte differentiation, including peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBPα), glucose transporter 4 (Glut4), adipokine fatty acid-binding protein (aP2), fatty acid synthase (FASN), and C/EBPβ [33, 34]. For example, in a study by Lu et al., it was shown that targeting and downregulating SIRT2 can lead to the upregulation of FASN and SREBP-1 expression, thereby promoting adipogenesis [35].

PPAR is a key transcription factor that maintains lipid homeostasis in tissues with three isoforms, PPARα, PPARβ/δ, and PPARγ, which have different subcellular localizations and functions [36]. Among them, PPARγ is a key transcriptional regulator of adipogenesis that can increase the expression of adipogenesis-related genes, including FASN [37]. Studies have shown that mammalian class O (FoxO) forkhead transcription factor 1 (FOXO1) can inhibit the PPARγ gene, leading to the upregulation of SLC2A4 (GLUT4) gene expression, and FOXO1 can also affect GLUT4 to regulate insulin sensitivity [38]. SIRT2 deacetylates FOXO1 and simultaneously reduces the phosphorylation level of FOXO1 by synergistic action (insulin and/or insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) activates protein kinase B (Akt, PKB) via phosphorylation), preventing FOXO1 from translocating from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, strengthening the binding of FOXO1 to the PPARγ gene promoter, inhibiting transcription of the PPARγ gene, and ultimately inhibiting adipogenesis [39].

3.1.2. Lipid Synthesis

In the de novo synthesis of lipids, ATP-citrate lyase (ACLY) cleaves citrate into acetyl-CoA (acetyl-CoA) and oxaloacetate (OAA) under ATP-consuming conditions, thereby converting intracellular glucose catabolism linked to de novo lipid synthesis of lipids. Therefore, ACLY is a key enzyme in the synthesis of nascent lipids and can regulate gene expression by supplying acetyl-CoA, thereby linking the metabolic status to histone acetylation [40]. Numerous studies have shown that lipid synthesis can be affected by regulating the acetylation state of ACLY through SIRT2 and P300/calcium-binding protein (CBP)-associated factor (PCAF) acetyltransferases. SIRT2 deacetylates ACLY for ubiquitination and degradation, inhibiting de novo lipid synthesis. P300/PCAF catalyses the opposite effect [41, 42]. In addition, studies have shown that SIRT2 can target lysine 458 of hepatocyte nuclear factor 4α (HNF4α) to deacetylate HNF4α to promote its stability, thereby preventing the degeneration of liver fat [43].

Cholesterol synthesis is mainly controlled by the sterol regulatory element binding protein SREBP-2 [44]. In the endoplasmic reticulum, the inactive precursor of SREBP tightly binds the SREBP cleavage activator protein (SCAP) to retain it on the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. In the presence of low sterol levels, the SREBP-SCAP complex is transported to the Golgi apparatus, where the inactive precursor undergoes cleavage by S1P and S2P, converting it into the active form nSREBP-2 (the SREBP-2 nuclear form). Finally, nSREBP-2 translocates to the nucleus and binds the sterol response element (SRE) to activate the transcription of cholesterol synthesis-related genes and promote cholesterol synthesis [45–48]. The binding of nSREBP-2 to the SRE can be mediated by a feedforward mechanism that induces the transcription of SREBP-2 [49]. Studies have shown that SIRT2 can lead to cholesterol biosynthesis by promoting the nuclear translocation of SREBP-2 [50].

3.2. Fatty Acid Oxidation

Fatty acid oxidation is the main source of energy in the body and mainly occurs in the liver and muscle but does not occur in nerve tissue. β-oxidation and specific oxidation modes (propionic acid oxidation, α-oxidation, ω-oxidation, and unsaturated fatty acid oxidation) occur.

Recent studies have shown that genes involved in fatty acid oxidation are transcriptionally regulated by PPAR and its coactivator peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator 1 (PGC-1). PPARα can enhance fatty acid β-oxidation and the expression of ketogenic genes, and PPARδ can induce long-chain fatty acid (LCFA) oxidation genes and control mitochondrial biogenesis and function by inducing PGC-1, thereby affecting the oxidation of fatty acids [51].

Previous studies have shown that SIRT2 is involved in lipid synthesis by affecting the nuclear translocation of FOXO1, which inhibits the transcription of PPARγ [39]. SIRT2 can also inhibit lipid synthesis by downregulating FOXO1 [52]. However, a recent study by Akbulut et al. showed that decreased FOXO1 levels were related to lipid peroxidation and increased SIRT2 expression levels [53]. However, the specific mechanism remains unclear. In addition, Krishnan et al. showed that SIRT2 could deacetylate PGC-1, resulting in increased β-oxidation and mitochondrial gene expression [54].

3.3. SIRT2 and Glucose Metabolism-Related Signal Transduction

The metabolism of sugar in the human body is divided into anabolism and catabolism, which are in a dynamic balance to stabilize the blood sugar levels. The main processes of glucose metabolism in the human body include the uptake of glucose by intestinal epithelial cells, the decomposition of glycogen in the liver, gluconeogenesis to produce glucose, and the uptake and decomposition of blood glucose by other tissues (Figure 2).

Figure 2

SIRT2 is involved in glucose metabolism. SIRT2 promotes gluconeogenesis by deacetylating FOXO1 and PEPCK. SIRT2 can promote glycolysis by interacting with glycolytic enzymes. SIRT2 can promote insulin secretion through the Akt/GSK-3β/β-catenin pathway. SIRT2 can also regulate glucose metabolism through the insulin-PI3K-AKT-metabolism pathway. AMPK can phosphorylate and activate SIRT2 and enhance the interaction between SIRT2 and AKT. In addition, SIRT2 can activate AKT and PDK1 through deacetylation, thereby promoting glycolysis and inhibiting gluconeogenesis.

3.3.1. Gluconeogenesis

After fasting, the body is in a state of nutrient deficiency and needs to use substances within the body to produce glucose and provide the energy required for physiological activities. During short-term fasting, the liver produces and releases glucose primarily through glycogenolysis. During prolonged fasting, glycogen is depleted, and hepatocytes use nonsugar substances (lactic acid, pyruvate, glycerol, and glycogenic amino acids) to produce and release glucose through gluconeogenesis.

Studies have shown that SIRT2 is involved in the regulation of gluconeogenesis mainly through phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK/PCK), which is encoded by the PCK gene. Since PEPCK can catalyse the conversion of OAA to phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) in the first step of gluconeogenesis, PEPCK is a key regulatory enzyme involved in hepatic glucose production. Jiang et al. showed that SIRT2 is the main deacetylase that acts on PEPCK1, which reduces the acetylation of PEPCK1 and the association between PEPCK1 and UBR5 (the HECT domain of E3 ubiquitin ligase), increasing the stability of PEPCK1 and thereby promoting gluconeogenesis [55–58]. In addition, SIRT2 can deacetylate FOXO1 and PGC-1α and promote the transcription of gluconeogenic enzyme genes, suggesting that SIRT2 may regulate gluconeogenesis through different mechanisms [39, 59].

3.3.2. Glycolysis and Glucose Uptake

After food is ingested, the blood sugar level increases due to the uptake of glucose by epithelial cells in the small intestine. After blood sugar rises, a large amount of energy is produced by consuming glucose to maintain normal physiological activities. After the energy requirement is met, unconsumed glucose is converted into glycogen and converted into fat by stimulating the secretion of insulin.

Hamaidi et al. showed that eight enzymes associated with glycolysis (hexokinase 1 (HK1), phosphofructokinase (PFKP), aldolase A (ALDOA), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), phosphoglycerate kinase 1 (PGK1), enolase 1 (ENO1), pyruvate kinase M (PKM), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)) interacted with SIRT2 [60]. Cha et al. further demonstrated that the acetylation levels and activities of glycolytic enzymes (ALDOA, PGK1, ENO1, and GAPDH) were regulated by SIRT2 but not SIRT1 [61]. Therefore, SIRT2 is a key enzyme that regulates the glycolytic pathway. In addition, glucokinase (GCK) can catalyse the conversion of glucose to 6-phosphate glucosamine to facilitate the consumption of glucose via glycolysis. SIRT2 can activate GCK by deacetylating GCK-regulated protein (GKRP), which separates GKRP from GCK (GCK), thereby promoting hepatic glucose uptake [62].

Studies have shown that the inhibition of SIRT2 can not only improve the stability of GKRP protein and promote the degradation of ALDOA but also inhibit glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) by regulating the Akt/glycogen synthase kinase (GSK)-3β/β-catenin pathway in β cells, resulting in a decrease in glycolytic flux [63, 64]. The main downstream signalling pathway of insulin action is the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-AKT/PKB pathway. Activated AKT can translocate to the nucleus to phosphorylate its targets (FOXO1, etc.), thereby inhibiting gluconeogenesis. In the insulin-PI3K-AKT-metabolism pathway, the activation of AKT first binds to the inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate (PIP (3)) on the plasma membrane, which causing changes in its conformation to activate kinase PDK1 and rapamycin complex 2 (mTORC2), and then, PDK1 and mTORC2 phosphorylate AKT Thr 308 and Ser 471 to activate AKT, so that the activated AKT is translocated to the nucleus [33, 39, 65–67]. SIRT2 can deacetylate AKT and PDK1, thereby promoting their membrane localization and activation [68, 69]. Insulin induces the dissociation of SIRT2 from AKT because adenosine 5′-monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activity is negatively regulated by insulin. The insulin-induced activation of PI3K-AKT inhibits AMPK, reduces the phosphorylation of SIRT2 by AMPK, and reduces SIRT2 activity to induce a dissociation between SIRT2 and AKT. Glucose and nutrient degradation and PI3K inhibition promote SIRT2 binding to AKT [58, 70, 71]. Therefore, while the decrease in SIRT2 reduces the secretion of insulin and the activation of AKT, the interaction between SIRT2 and AKT can be increased by the negative regulation of AMPK by insulin to inhibit gluconeogenesis.

3.3.3. Role of SIRT2 in the Intersection between Lipid and Glucose Metabolism

As previously mentioned, ACLY links glucose catabolism with lipid synthesis, creating crossover between lipid and glucose metabolism. SIRT2 can deacetylate ACLY to promote its ubiquitin-mediated degradation and reduce the conversion of glucose into acetyl-CoA, thereby inhibiting lipid synthesis [41, 42, 72]. Furthermore, while ACLY expression is regulated by SREBP-1, its activity is regulated by the PI3K/Akt pathway [73]. Studies have shown that ACLY is also a target of Akt, which can directly phosphorylate and activate ACLY [74]. SIRT2 can interact with Akt and regulate AKT activation through the insulin-PI3K-AKT pathway [68]. Therefore, SIRT2 can also indirectly act on ACLY through the PI3K-AKT pathway, thereby affecting the metabolism of carbohydrates and lipids to maintain metabolic stability in the body.

4. SIRT2 and Metabolic Disorders

4.1. Inflammation

Research has shown that there is a close relationship between metabolism and immunity [75]. Systemic low-grade chronic inflammation plays a key role in the pathogenesis of metabolic disorders, and the main regulators are nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and the inflammasome (NOD-like receptor pyrin domain-containing 3, NLRP3).

In the NF-κB pathway, SIRT2 is inactivated by Lys 310 deacetylation of the NF-κB subunit p65 in the cytoplasm, which decreases the expression of its downstream target genes (interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1), a chemokine that regulates the expression and secretion of activated normal T cells (RANTES), matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9), and MMP-13), thereby exerting anti-inflammatory effects [76, 77]. Lee et al. showed that inhibiting SIRT2 could reduce the phosphorylation and degradation of NF-κB, reduce the phosphorylation of NF-κB subunit p65 Ser 536, reduce the nuclear translocation of p65, and inhibit the expression of NF-κB [78]. This cascade reduces the expression of iNOS and NO, the downstream target genes of NF-κB, and exerts an anti-inflammatory effect. However, there has been no discussion regarding the specific molecular mechanism linking the phosphorylation and acetylation of p65. In other experimental inflammatory disease models, the anti-inflammatory effect of SIRT2 has been demonstrated by inhibiting the NF-κB signalling pathway [78–81]. However, Pais et al. showed that SIRT2 also stimulates the activation of NF-κB through Toll-like receptors (TLRs), leading to an inflammatory response [82]. In addition, studies have shown that the inflammatory NF-κB pathway is associated with SIRT2 and HSP90, but current research related to this topic is still controversial [83, 84].

In the MAPK-related inflammatory signalling pathway, SIRT2 deacetylates MKP-1, decreasing the acetylation level of MKP-1, which promotes the transduction of TLR signalling, upregulates MAPK signalling, and increases the ERK, p38, and JNK phosphorylation levels, thereby promoting the production of the proinflammatory factors IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and iNOS, leading to the occurrence of inflammation [85–88].

In the NLRP3 inflammatory signalling pathway, NLRP3 is acetylated by macrophages, which promotes the assembly and activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome, thereby enabling the production of the inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-18 to induce inflammatory reactions [89]. By contrast, the targeted deacetylation of NLRP3 by SIRT2 inactivates this process.

4.2. Oxidative Stress

SIRT2 protects against oxidative damage, and SIRT2-mediated deacetylation of its targets plays an important role during oxidative stress [90, 91]. Studies have shown that reactive oxygen species (ROS) are important enzymes that catalyse the generation of oxygen free radicals and activate oxidative stress responses [92]. SIRT2 can act on ROS through signalling pathways, such as FOXO3, Nrf2, PEPCK1, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1), and p65, to reduce the generation of oxygen free radicals [93].

Under oxidative stress, SIRT2 can activate its target FOXO3 through deacetylation, and then, FOXO3a shuttles to the nucleus and induces the expression of its target antioxidants manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD), SOD1/2, p27 (Kip1), and Bim, which reduce the cellular ROS levels and enhance the cellular antioxidant capacity [94–96].

Nrf2 is a key transcription factor that regulates the gene expression of multiple antioxidant enzymes [97]. Under normal physiological conditions, Nrf2 stably binds Kelch-like enoyl-CoA hydratase-associated protein 1 (Keap1) and is stabilized in the cytoplasm, preventing Nrf2 translocation to the nucleus and inhibiting the ability of Nrf2 to activate target genes [98]. Under oxidative stress, SIRT2 induces the dissociation of Nrf2 and Keap1, and Nrf2 translocates to the nucleus to interact with antioxidant response elements (AREs), thereby activating the target gene antioxidant element haem oxygenase 1 (HO-1) to protect cells from oxidative damage [97–100].

In addition, SIRT2 can regulate ROS by targeting metabolic enzymes, such as glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD), phosphoglyceride mutant enzyme (PGAM2), and NF-κB [101]. Under oxidative stress conditions, SIRT2 can deacetylate and activate the key enzyme G6PD in the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) to stimulate the production of cytoplasmic NADPH, thereby maintaining the reduced form of GSH against oxidative damage [102–104]. In addition, Xu et al. showed that SIRT2 could increase NADPH production through the deacetylation and activation of PGAM2 to enable cells to respond to oxidative stress [105]. SIRT2 promotes the activation of enzymes, including NADPH oxidase, xanthine oxidoreductase, inducible NO synthase, cyclooxygenase-2, and cytochrome p450, through the activation of NF-κB. SIRT2 can also target ROS-inhibiting enzymes, such as SOD 1 and 2, thioredoxin, and glutathione S-transferase, which increase the level of ROS in cells. In turn, NF-κB activity is also regulated by the ROS levels [82, 106].

Studies have shown that SIRT2 can also deacetylate PARP1 K249, resulting in the ubiquitination and degradation of PARP1 by WW domain-containing protein 2 (WWP2), thereby alleviating the vascular oxidative stress injury caused by PARP1 mediated by angiotensin II (Ang II) [107]. Alternatively, SIRT2 can deacetylate K431 of Bcl-2-associated athanogene 3 (BAG3), thereby mediating BAG3 binding to PARP1 to promote the ubiquitination degradation of WWP2 at PARP1 K249 to protect against oxidative damage [108].

Collectively, these findings suggest that SIRT2 plays a key role in regulating the oxidative stress response, which protects organisms from metabolic damage through oxidative stress-dependent mechanisms.

5. Role of SIRT2 in Disease

SIRT2 participates in metabolic pathways through various signalling pathways and is associated with the occurrence of nervous system-related degenerative diseases, various tumours, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases (Figure 3).

Figure 3

The role of SIRT2 in various metabolic disorders. SIRT2 promotes the progression of Huntington’s disease, acute ischaemic stroke, multiple myeloma, prostate cancer, clear-cell renal cell carcinoma, liver cancer, gastric cancer, and ischaemia reperfusion injury. SIRT2 inhibits the progression of traumatic brain injury coronary heart disease, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, heart failure, cardiac hypertrophy, myocardial hypertrophy, and myocardial infarction. The role of SIRT2 in type 2 diabetes, colorectal cancer, and breast cancer remains controversial.

5.1. SIRT2 and Neurodegenerative Diseases

Neurodegenerative diseases are neurasthenic disorders in which the main pathogenic mechanism is protein degradation and inflammatory defects caused by impairments in energy metabolism and disturbances in redox homeostasis [109, 110]. SIRT2 is expressed in almost all brain cells, particularly oligodendrocytes in the central nervous system, and is indirectly involved in cellular processes relevant to the pathophysiology of neurodegenerative diseases [111, 112].

In Huntington’s disease (HD), SIRT2 inhibition was shown to prevent HD by reducing sterol biosynthesis and exerting neuroprotective effects [113]. This protective effect was closely related to the transcriptional regulation of genes that control metabolism, including sterol and fatty acid biosynthesis, carbohydrate metabolism, and purine metabolism [114].

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is associated with an increased risk of different neurodegenerative diseases, and the main pathological features include neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, excitotoxicity, and mitochondrial dysfunction. Studies have shown that SIRT2 plays a protective role in TBI. In TBI, SIRT2 inhibition stimulates NF-κB activation, induces MMP-9 expression, and perturbs the blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity, allowing plasma components, such as macrophages and inflammatory factors, to more readily cross the BBB, which worsens neuroinflammation [115]. Alternatively, SIRT2 exerts a protective effect by inhibiting p53-induced ferroptosis [116].

The pathogenesis of acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) mainly involves oxidative stress, impaired mitochondrial function, and poststroke inflammation [117]. Studies have shown that SIRT2 expression is positively correlated with the severity of AIS and proinflammatory cytokines, but its specific mechanism still needs further study.

5.2. SIRT2 and Cancer

Metabolic pathway reprogramming is a hallmark of cancer, and SIRT2 can affect tumour progression through metabolic pathways. In recent years, the role of SIRT2 in cancer has remained controversial, and SIRT2 acts as both an oncogene and a tumour suppressor; to a certain extent, its impact may be greater than that of SIRT1 [118]. Therefore, SIRT2 has become a new focus of tumour research.

As a tumour-promoting factor, SIRT2 mainly promotes the immune escape of tumour cells by inducing immune avoidance, improving energy metabolism, and changing the tumour microenvironment, thereby inducing the development of tumours. In this article, we mainly describe the effects of SIRT2 on cancer through metabolic pathways. Studies have shown that SIRT2 can promote various cancers through various metabolic pathways. In gastric cancer, SIRT2, as a downstream target of miR-138, can increase PEPCK1-related metabolism, thereby promoting gastric cancer cell migration and invasion through the RAS/ERK/JNK/MMP-9 pathway [119, 120]. In colorectal cancer (CRC), Wnt/β-catenin inhibition can increase the expression level of the Wnt/β-catenin target gene SIRT2 and promote the proliferation of CRC cells [121]. In breast cancer, SIRT2 can be activated by NOTCH signalling, leading to the deacetylation and activation of high aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH1A1), thereby promoting breast cancer progression [122]. In liver cancer, SIRT2 can promote mitochondrial metabolism and inhibit the E-cadherin pathway, thereby promoting cancer cell invasion [123]. In prostate cancer (PCa), SIRT2-mediated deacetylation of LIFR-K620 inhibits the progression of PCa [124]. In multiple myeloma (MM), a high expression of SIRT2 can act on the RAS/ERK signalling pathway to promote MM cell proliferation, thereby promoting MM progression [125]. In clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), SIRT2 deacetylates G6PD and increases its stability, thereby promoting ccRCC progression [126]. In addition, the deacetylation of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) by SIRT2 increases its enzymatic activity, leading to the accumulation of lactate and promoting tumour cell proliferation [127]. Under conditions of nutrient excess, the activity of SIRT2 decreases, and the level of the acetylation of PKM2 increases, which increases its enzymatic activity and decreases lactate production and pyruvate accumulation, thereby resulting in a similar Warburg effect to promote cancer progression [128–130].

As a tumour suppressor, SIRT2 can inhibit cancer by not only inhibiting fibroblast activity and angiogenesis but also inhibiting cancer through various metabolic pathways [131]. Studies have shown that T cells from SIRT2-deficient mice exhibit increased glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation, resulting in enhanced proliferation and effector functions and exerting antitumour effects [60]. In breast cancer, SIRT2 not only promotes tumours but also suppresses tumours. For example, SIRT2 can inhibit the antioxidant activity of peroxiredoxin-1 (Prdx-1), rendering breast cancer cells sensitive to ROS-induced DNA damage and cytotoxicity, leading to apoptosis in breast cancer cells [132]. Alternatively, SIRT2 regulates the reversible acetylation of PHGDH through TIP60 and promotes the binding of PHGDH and RNF5 to induce PHGDH degradation, which reduces the serine and glycine levels and disturbs redox homeostasis, thereby inhibiting breast cancer cell proliferation [133]. In colorectal cancer, SIRT2 also inhibits CRC progression [134]. SIRT2 deacetylation is an important mechanism that regulates IDH1, which can exhibit tumour suppressor function by targeting the IDH1 K224 residue [135]. Furthermore, in many other tumour cell types, SIRT2 can deacetylate ACLY and reduce its stability, thereby inhibiting tumour cell proliferation [41].

In brief, the current evidence suggests that SIRT2 plays dual roles in cancer, and its specific role in cancer still needs to be revealed by further studies.

5.3. SIRT2 and Diabetes

In recent years, with the increasing number of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), increasing attention has been given to its pathogenesis and treatment. Studies have shown that T2D pathogenesis is mediated by abnormal glucose metabolism, insulin resistance (IR), and β-cell function. SIRT2 is a key hub in metabolic processes and, therefore, has been investigated as a potential therapeutic target for T2D [62, 90].

PEPCK1 can promote the utilization of glucose and glutamine via anabolism; thus, it is an important marker in evaluating T2D [119]. Studies have shown that inhibiting the deacetylase SIRT2 in the liver can promote the acetylation of PEPCK1, leading to its degradation and thereby inhibiting gluconeogenesis [56, 57].

IT in skeletal muscle is associated with a prediabetic state [136]. SIRT2 expression decreases with the progression of diabetic osteoarthritis (OA), resulting in increased H3 acetylation, oxidative stress, and inflammatory responses. Inhibiting SIRT2 accelerates the progression of diabetic OA, whereas the upregulation of SIRT2 may alleviate the development of diabetic OA by inhibiting the oxidative stress and inflammatory responses associated with H3 deacetylation. Furthermore, SIRT2 attenuates oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction and increases insulin sensitivity in hepatocytes [137].

Impaired hepatic glucose uptake (HGU) contributes to postprandial hyperglycaemia in T2D. In HFD-fed obese diabetic mice and db/db mice, SIRT2 activity decreased with decreasing hepatic NAD + levels, which enhanced GKRP acetylation and impaired HGU, whereas K126 deacetylation of GKRP alleviated glucose tolerance and impaired IR. Therefore, SIRT2 ameliorated HGU damage by deacetylating K126 of GKRP, dissociating glucose-dependent GCK from GKRP [62, 63].

These studies show that SIRT2 protects against diabetes. However, Zheng et al. showed the opposite effects, suggesting that the haplotype of SIRT2 contributes to transcription factor binding and T2D susceptibility [138]. Although the role of SIRT2 in diabetes is currently controversial, undoubtedly, SIRT2 may be a novel molecular target for future diabetes treatment.

5.4. SIRT2 and Cardiovascular Disease

Currently, cardiovascular disease is an important factor in human mortality, and its pathogenesis involves oxidative stress, the inflammatory response, apoptosis, autophagy, myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion, ageing, and energy restriction [139]. Therefore, studies have increasingly been conducted to explore the relationship between SIRT2 and cardiovascular disease.

Atherosclerosis is a main cause of cardiovascular disease. Studies have shown that during atherosclerosis, SIRT2 can inhibit the occurrence and development of atherosclerotic macrophages by inhibiting the polarization of macrophages [139]. Alternatively, SIRT2 can directly act on its target Nrf2/FOXO3/PARP1 and indirectly act on PARP1 by deacetylating BAG3, which alleviates the further aggravation of hypertension and oxidative stress, prevents intraluminal occlusion and stenosis from causing organic lesions, and avoids the occurrence of coronary heart disease (CHD) of myocardial ischaemia [97, 98, 107, 108]. Furthermore, in acute myocardial infarction (AMI), functional DNA sequence variants (DSVs) can alter the SIRT2 levels by affecting the transcriptional activity of the SIRT2 promoter, leading to the progression of AMI into severe disease [140].

In heart failure, the downregulation of the creatine kinase (CK) system is a hallmark of impaired myocardial energy in failing hearts, and the acetylation of muscle creatine kinase negatively affects high-energy phosphate transfer in heart failure [141]. Deacetylation by SIRT2 reduces the acetylation of key lysine residues, improves dimer formation, and restores CK muscle form (CKM) activity in failing heart tissue, resulting in the amelioration of heart failure. In addition, miR-140-5p inhibitor experiments have shown that inhibiting miR-221-3p leads to SIRT2 activation, thereby targeting Nrf2/FOXO3, inhibiting cardiomyocyte apoptosis and oxidative stress, and relieving cardiac exhaustion [142, 143].

In cardiac hypertrophy, SIRT2 acts as a cardioprotective deacetylase [144]. SIRT2 binds and deacetylates LKB1 at lysine 48, promoting the phosphorylation of LKB1 and its translocation from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, which activates LKB1-AMPK signalling. Some other targets of SIRT2, such as FOXO1 and PGC1-α, are also known regulators of cardiac hypertrophy. FOXO1, FOXO3a, and PGC1α are also downstream of LKB1-AMPK signalling. Therefore, the activation of LKB1-AMPK signalling may be a core mechanism underlying SIRT2-mediated cardioprotective effects. This hypothesis was confirmed in a study by Mei et al., who showed that CSN6 was partially dependent on the stabilization of the Nkx2.2 protein, which is a transcriptional repressor of SIRT2 that inhibits SIRT2 and promotes cardiac hypertrophy [145]. Gu et al. showed that PHD finger protein 19 (PHF19) can inhibit the expression of SIRT2, thereby promoting Ang II-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy [146]. Furthermore, in myocardial infarction, maintaining SIRT2 activity can interfere with the interaction between CDK5 and SIRT2 through the interaction between LncHrt and SIRT2, thereby activating the downstream LKB1-AMPK cascade to maintain the balance of cardiac metabolism [147]. Collectively, these studies have shown that SIRT2 is a cardioprotective deacetylase in cardiovascular disease and could be a therapeutic target for cardiovascular disease.

5.5. SIRT2 and Other Metabolic Diseases

Recent studies have shown that the NAD+/SIRT2 pathway plays an important role in regulating nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) [148]. NR (nicotinamide riboside) stimulates SIRT2, promotes SIRT2 deacetylation, and stabilizes Fndc5 to prevent HFD-induced NAFLD; SIRT2 also deacetylates and stabilizes CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta (C/EBPβ) to prevent NAFLD; alternatively, NAFLD can be treated by targeting the SIRT2-HNF4α pathway [43, 149, 150]. Furthermore, during hepatic ischaemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury, SIRT2 upregulates the MAPK pathway through MKP-1 deacetylation, thereby enhancing the inflammatory response and cell death, leading to the exacerbation of postoperative liver injury [151].

5.6. Application of SIRT2 in Disease

As previously mentioned, SIRT2 enables crosstalk between gene expression regulation and metabolism and plays an important role in related diseases; thus, it can be used as a key target for disease treatment or drug development. In mouse models of HD and acute cerebral ischaemia, AK-7, an inhibitor of SIRT2, showed neuroprotective effects [152, 153]. The cardiotoxicity caused by the antineoplastic drug doxorubicin can be alleviated by increasing SIRT2 activity with limonoid or the adiponectin agonist ADP355 [142, 154]. In the treatment of NAFLD, silibinin can increase the activity of SIRT2, thereby protecting the liver [155].

In addition, numerous studies have shown that SIRT2 has different expression characteristics in different diseases; thus, it can be used as a biomarker of disease to judge the occurrence, development, and prognosis of disease. In tumours, SIRT2 can be used as a biomarker for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of tumours, such as to predict the development of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and endometrial cancer (EC) [156–158]. SIRT2 predicts future atrial fibrillation prevalence in coronary artery disease (CAD) and myocardial infarction [159, 160].

Overall, currently, SIRT2 is mainly applied to screen drugs as therapeutic targets for disease or as a biomarker to facilitate the diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of disease. However, the clinical application of SIRT2 requires further research.

6. Conclusion

The current study shows that SIRT2 can form crosstalk between gene expression regulation and metabolic regulation, and thus, SIRT2 plays an important role in maintaining metabolic homeostasis and the occurrence of related diseases. SIRT2 can participate in metabolic processes, such as adipogenesis, lipid synthesis, gluconeogenesis, glycolysis and glucose uptake, inflammatory response, and oxidative stress, through the regulation of gene expression and cause neurodegeneration, cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, metabolic disorders, etc. It is believed that in-depth research in the future could help us elucidate more molecular mechanisms of SIRT2 between gene expression and metabolic pathways to use it as a potential target for disease treatment and promote its clinical application.

Data Availability

All the data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Changhui Zhu, Zhengbin Chai, and Chunyan Liu wrote the manuscript. Changhui Zhu, Xue Dong, Xiwei Wang, Yingying Zheng, Yanling Peng, Juanjuan Qiu, and Jiajun Xu prepared the figures in this work. Zhengbin Chai and Chunyan Liu provided funding. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Zhengbin Chai and Chunyan Liu equally contributed to this work.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Jinan Science and Technology Development Program (Nos. 202019192 and 201907116), the National Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2021LSW018), the Shandong Provincial Key R&D Program (No. 2019GSF108115), and the National Natural Science Foundation for the Youth of China (No. 81802422).

References

L. F. Costa-Machado and P. J. Fernandez-Marcos, “The sirtuin family in cancer,” Cell Cycle, vol. 18, no. 18, pp. 2164–2196, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Shen, X. Deng, Z. Chen et al., “SIRT1: a potential therapeutic target in Autoimmune diseases,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 12, Article ID 779177, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Yang, M. Zhu, J. Liang et al., “SIRT6 mediates multidimensional modulation to maintain organism homeostasis,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Li, Z. Dong, J. Yang et al., “Progress in roles and mechanisms of deacetylase SIRT7,” Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 13–26, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
Z. Ji, G. H. Liu, and J. Qu, “Mitochondrial sirtuins, metabolism, and aging,” Journal of Genetics and Genomics, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 287–298, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. J. North, B. L. Marshall, M. T. Borra, J. M. Denu, and E. Verdin, “The human Sir2 ortholog, SIRT2, is an NAD+-dependent tubulin deacetylase,” Molecular Cell, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 437–444, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Kunadis, E. Lakiotaki, P. Korkolopoulou, and C. Piperi, “Targeting post-translational histone modifying enzymes in glioblastoma,” Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 220, Article ID 107721, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. J. Lee, M. M. Lee, S. Park, and K. S. Jeong, “Sirt2 positively regulates muscle regeneration after notexin-induced muscle injury,” Experimental and Molecular Pathology, vol. 127, Article ID 104798, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Zhang, P. Head, W. Daddacha et al., “ATRIP deacetylation by SIRT2 drives ATR checkpoint activation by promoting binding to RPA-ssDNA,” Cell Reports, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1435–1447, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Zhang, S. H. Park, B. G. Pantazides et al., “SIRT2 directs the replication stress response through CDK9 deacetylation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, vol. 110, no. 33, pp. 13546–13551, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Chen, Y. Luo, K. Warncke et al., “Acetylation regulates ribonucleotide reductase activity and cancer cell growth,” Nature Communications, vol. 10, no. 1, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Muth, S. Nadaud, I. Grummt, and R. Voit, “Acetylation of TAF(I)68, a subunit of TIF-IB/SL1, activates RNA polymerase I transcription,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1353–1362, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. S. Bae, M. J. Swanson, A. Vassilev, and B. H. Howard, “Human histone deacetylase SIRT2 interacts with the homeobox transcription factor HOXA10,” Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 135, no. 6, pp. 695–700, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Shah, A. Ito, A. Nakata, and M. Yoshida, “Identification of a selective SIRT2 inhibitor and its anti-breast cancer activity,” Biological & Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 1739–1742, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ishfaq, K. Maeta, S. Maeda, T. Natsume, A. Ito, and M. Yoshida, “Acetylation regulates subcellular localization of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A (eIF5A),” FEBS Letters, vol. 586, no. 19, pp. 3236–3241, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ishfaq, K. Maeta, S. Maeda, T. Natsume, A. Ito, and M. Yoshida, “The role of acetylation in the subcellular localization of an oncogenic isoform of translation factor eIF5A,” Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, vol. 76, no. 11, pp. 2165–2167, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Yi, Y. Zhang, Z. Wang et al., “The deacetylation-phosphorylation regulation of SIRT2-SMC1A axis as a mechanism of antimitotic catastrophe in early tumorigenesis,” Science Advances, vol. 7, no. 9, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Serrano, P. Martinez-Redondo, A. Marazuela-Duque et al., “The tumor suppressor SirT2 regulates cell cycle progression and genome stability by modulating the mitotic deposition of H4K20 methylation,” Genes & Development, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 639–653, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Bhaskar, S. Kumar, M. Z. Khan, A. Singh, V. P. Dwivedi, and V. K. Nandicoori, “Host sirtuin 2 as an immunotherapeutic target against tuberculosis,” eLife, vol. 9, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Xu, X. Guan, X. Jia, H. Li, R. Chen, and Y. Lu, “In-depth profiling and quantification of the lysine acetylome in hepatocellular carcinoma with a trapped ion mobility mass spectrometer,” Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, vol. 21, no. 8, Article ID 100255, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Delaney, M. Tan, Z. Zhu et al., “Histone lysine methacrylation is a dynamic post-translational modification regulated by HAT1 and SIRT2,” Cell Discovery, vol. 7, no. 1, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Ntorla and J. R. Burgoyne, “The regulation and function of histone crotonylation,” Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 9, Article ID 624914, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Bao, Y. Wang, X. Li et al., “Identification of “erasers” for lysine crotonylated histone marks using a chemical proteomics approach,” Elife, vol. 3, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Tian, J. Yang, A. D. Guo et al., “Genetically encoded benzoyllysines serve as versatile probes for interrogating histone benzoylation and interactions in living cells,” ACS Chemical Biology, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 2560–2569, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Huang, D. Zhang, Y. Wang et al., “Lysine benzoylation is a histone mark regulated by SIRT2,” Nature Communications, vol. 9, no. 1, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Cui, X. Li, J. Lin, Q. Hao, and X. D. Li, “Histone ketoamide adduction by 4-oxo-2-nonenal is a reversible posttranslational modification regulated by Sirt2,” ACS Chemical Biology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 47–51, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. J. Galligan, K. L. Rose, W. N. Beavers et al., “Stable histone adduction by 4-oxo-2-nonenal: a potential link between oxidative stress and epigenetics,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 136, no. 34, pp. 11864–11866, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Jin, B. He, X. Zhang, H. Lin, and Y. Wang, “SIRT2 reverses 4-oxononanoyl lysine modification on histones,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 138, no. 38, pp. 12304–12307, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Xie, L. Chen, R. Wang et al., “Chemical probes reveal sirt2’s new function as a robust “eraser” of lysine lipoylation,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 141, no. 46, pp. 18428–18436, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Kosciuk, I. R. Price, X. Zhang et al., “NMT1 and NMT2 are lysine myristoyltransferases regulating the ARF6 GTPase cycle,” Nature Communications, vol. 11, no. 1, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Li, V. Valsakumar, K. Poorey, S. Bekiranov, and J. S. Smith, “Genome-wide analysis of functional sirtuin chromatin targets in yeast,” Genome Biology, vol. 14, no. 5, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Zhang, E. B. Dammer, D. M. Duong, D. Danelia, N. T. Seyfried, and D. S. Yu, “Quantitative proteomic analysis of the lysine acetylome reveals diverse SIRT2 substrates,” Scientific Reports, vol. 12, no. 1, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Jing, S. Gesta, and C. R. Kahn, “SIRT2 regulates adipocyte differentiation through FoxO1 acetylation/deacetylation,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 105–114, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Siersbæk, R. Nielsen, and S. Mandrup, “Transcriptional networks and chromatin remodeling controlling adipogenesis,” Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 56–64, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Lu, H. Xia, J. Jiang et al., “MicroRNA-212 targets SIRT2 to influence lipogenesis in bovine mammary epithelial cell line,” Journal of Dairy Research, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 232–238, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Wahli and L. Michalik, “PPARs at the crossroads of lipid signaling and inflammation,” Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 351–363, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Zhang, Q. Sun, W. Zhong, X. Sun, and Z. Zhou, “Hepatic peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma signaling contributes to alcohol-induced hepatic steatosis and inflammation in mice,” Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 988–999, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Jiao, X. Liang, J. Hou et al., “Adenovirus type 36 regulates adipose stem cell differentiation and glucolipid metabolism through the PI3K/Akt/FoxO1/PPARγ signaling pathway,” Lipids in Health and Disease, vol. 18, no. 1, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Wang and Q. Tong, “SIRT2 suppresses adipocyte differentiation by deacetylating FOXO1 and enhancing FOXO1’s repressive interaction with PPARγ,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 801–808, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Chowdhury, A. Kar, D. Bhowmik et al., “Intracellular Acetyl CoA potentiates the therapeutic efficacy of anti-tumor CD8+ T cells,” Cancer Research, vol. 82, 2022.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Lin, R. Tao, X. Gao et al., “Acetylation stabilizes ATP-citrate lyase to promote lipid biosynthesis and tumor growth,” Molecular Cell, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 506–518, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Guo, Y. Y. Guo, B. Y. Li et al., “Enhanced acetylation of ATP-citrate lyase promotes the progression of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 294, no. 31, pp. 11805–11816, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Ren, F. Hu, D. Wang et al., “Sirtuin 2 prevents liver steatosis and metabolic disorders by deacetylation of hepatocyte nuclear factor 4α,” Hepatology, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 723–740, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. S. Dinavahi, Y. C. Chen, R. Gowda et al., “Targeting protein translation in melanoma by inhibiting EEF-2 kinase regulates cholesterol metabolism though SREBP2 to inhibit tumour development,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 23, no. 7, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Li, M. Liu, Z. Li et al., “Sterol-resistant SCAP overexpression in vascular smooth muscle cells accelerates atherosclerosis by increasing local vascular inflammation through activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome in mice,” Aging and Disease, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 747–763, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kong, Y. Zhu, J. Shao, Z. Fan, and Y. Xu, “The chromatin remodeling protein BRG1 regulates SREBP maturation by activating SCAP transcription in hepatocytes,” Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 9, Article ID 622866, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. H. Lee, J. H. Lee, and S. S. Im, “The cellular function of SCAP in metabolic signaling,” Experimental & Molecular Medicine, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 724–729, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Gomez, S. Campusano, M. S. Gutierrez et al., “Sterol regulatory element-binding protein Sre1 regulates carotenogenesis in the red yeast xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 61, no. 12, pp. 1658–1674, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Sato, J. Inoue, Y. Kawabe, T. Kodama, T. Takano, and M. Maeda, “Sterol-dependent transcriptional regulation of sterol regulatory element-binding protein-2,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 271, no. 43, pp. 26461–26464, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. P. Thangaraj, K. L. Furber, L. Sobchishin, S. Ji, J. R. Doucette, and A. J. Nazarali, “Does Sirt2 regulate cholesterol biosynthesis during oligodendroglial differentiation in vitro and in vivo?” Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 329–340, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. T. Nakamura, B. E. Yudell, and J. J. Loor, “Regulation of energy metabolism by long-chain fatty acids,” Progress in Lipid Research, vol. 53, pp. 124–144, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Park, M. J. Chung, J. Y. Son et al., “The role of sirtuin 2 in sustaining functional integrity of the liver,” Life Sciences, vol. 285, Article ID 119997, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. G. Akbulut, S. H. Aktas, and H. Akbulut, “The role of melatonin, sirtuin2 and FoXO1 transcription factor in the aging process of colon in male rats,” Biogerontology, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 99–108, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Krishnan, C. Danzer, T. Simka et al., “Dietary obesity-associated Hif1α activation in adipocytes restricts fatty acid oxidation and energy expenditure via suppression of the Sirt2-NAD+ system,” Genes & Development, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 259–270, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Jiang, S. Wang, M. Xiao et al., “Acetylation regulates gluconeogenesis by promoting PEPCK1 degradation via recruiting the UBR5 ubiquitin ligase,” Molecular Cell, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 33–44, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Zhang, Y. Pan, R. G. Dorfman et al., “Sirtinol promotes PEPCK1 degradation and inhibits gluconeogenesis by inhibiting deacetylase SIRT2,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. R. Ren, Y. L. Ye, Y. Feng et al., “SL010110, a lead compound, inhibits gluconeogenesis via SIRT2-p300-mediated PEPCK1 degradation and improves glucose homeostasis in diabetic mice,” Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 1834–1846, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. H. Yao, H. K. Nguyen, and B. L. G. Nyomba, “Prenatal ethanol exposure causes glucose intolerance with increased hepatic gluconeogenesis and histone deacetylases in adult rat offspring: reversal by tauroursodeoxycholic acid,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 3, Article ID e59680, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Schartner, M. G. Sabbir, A. Saleh et al., “High glucose concentration suppresses a SIRT2 regulated pathway that enhances neurite outgrowth in cultured adult sensory neurons,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 309, pp. 134–147, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Hamaidi, L. Zhang, N. Kim et al., “Sirt2 inhibition enhances metabolic fitness and effector functions of tumor-reactive T cells,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 420–436, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Cha, M. J. Han, H. J. Cha et al., “Metabolic control of primed human pluripotent stem cell fate and function by the miR-200c-SIRT2 axis,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 445–456, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Watanabe, Y. Inaba, K. Kimura et al., “Sirt2 facilitates hepatic glucose uptake by deacetylating glucokinase regulatory protein,” Nature Communications, vol. 9, no. 1, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Zhou, L. Zhang, K. Zhu et al., “SIRT2 ablation inhibits glucose-stimulated insulin secretion through decreasing glycolytic flux,” Theranostics, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 4825–4838, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Qian, Y. Yang, N. Tang et al., “M1 macrophage-derived exosomes impair beta cell insulin secretion via miR-212-5p by targeting SIRT2 and inhibiting Akt/GSK-3β/β-catenin pathway in mice,” Diabetologia, vol. 64, no. 9, pp. 2037–2051, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Martelli, G. Tabellini, D. Bressanin et al., “The emerging multiple roles of nuclear Akt,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research, vol. 1823, no. 12, pp. 2168–2178, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. A. Hemmings and D. F. Restuccia, “PI3K-PKB/Akt pathway,” Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, vol. 4, no. 9, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Schultze, B. A. Hemmings, M. Niessen, and O. Tschopp, “PI3K/AKT, MAPK and AMPK signalling: protein kinases in glucose homeostasis,” Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine, vol. 14, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Ramakrishnan, G. Davaakhuu, L. Kaplun et al., “Sirt2 deacetylase is a novel AKT binding partner critical for AKT activation by insulin,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 289, no. 9, pp. 6054–6066, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. R. Sundaresan, V. B. Pillai, D. Wolfgeher et al., “The deacetylase SIRT1 promotes membrane localization and activation of Akt and PDK1 during tumorigenesis and cardiac hypertrophy,” Science Signaling, vol. 4, no. 182, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. J. North and E. Verdin, “Mitotic regulation of SIRT2 by cyclin-dependent kinase 1-dependent phosphorylation,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 27, pp. 19546–19555, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Hahn-Windgassen, V. Nogueira, C. C. Chen, J. E. Skeen, N. Sonenberg, and N. Hay, “Akt activates the mammalian target of rapamycin by regulating cellular ATP level and AMPK activity,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 37, pp. 32081–32089, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Wang, L. Jiang, J. Wang et al., “Abrogation of hepatic ATP-citrate lyase protects against fatty liver and ameliorates hyperglycemia in leptin receptor-deficient mice,” Hepatology, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 1166–1175, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. M. Kim, H. T. Shin, Y. H. Seo et al., “Sterol regulatory element-binding protein (SREBP)-1-mediated lipogenesis is involved in cell senescence,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 38, pp. 29069–29077, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Migita, T. Narita, K. Nomura et al., “ATP citrate lyase: activation and therapeutic implications in non-small cell lung cancer,” Cancer Research, vol. 68, no. 20, pp. 8547–8554, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Osborn and J. M. Olefsky, “The cellular and signaling networks linking the immune system and metabolism in disease,” Nature Medicine, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 363–374, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. M. Rothgiesser, S. Erener, S. Waibel, B. Luscher, and M. O. Hottiger, “SIRT2 regulates NF-κB-dependent gene expression through deacetylation of p65 Lys310,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 123, no. 24, pp. 4251–4258, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Lin, B. Sun, C. Jiang, H. Hong, and Y. Zheng, “Sirt2 suppresses inflammatory responses in collagen-induced arthritis,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 441, no. 4, pp. 897–903, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. S. Lee, Y. J. Jung, D. Kim et al., “SIRT2 ameliorates lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation in macrophages,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 450, no. 4, pp. 1363–1369, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhang and D. Chi, “Overexpression of SIRT2 alleviates neuropathic pain and neuroinflammation through deacetylation of transcription factor nuclear factor-kappa B,” Inflammation, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 569–578, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Wang, Y. Zhang, W. Cao, X. Wei, J. Chen, and W. Ying, “SIRT2 plays significant roles in lipopolysaccharides-induced neuroinflammation and brain injury in mice,” Neurochemical Research, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 2490–2500, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Chen, D. Wu, X. Ding, and W. Ying, “SIRT2 is required for lipopolysaccharide-induced activation of BV2 microglia,” NeuroReport, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 88–93, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. F. Pais, E. M. Szego, O. Marques et al., “The NAD-dependent deacetylase sirtuin 2 is a suppressor of microglial activation and brain inflammation,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 32, no. 19, pp. 2603–2616, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. S. Thangjam, C. Birmpas, N. Barabutis et al., “Hsp90 inhibition suppresses NF-κB transcriptional activation via Sirt-2 in human lung microvascular endothelial cells,” American Journal of Physiology - Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology, vol. 310, no. 10, pp. L964–L974, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Sun, X. Wang, N. Fang et al., “SIRT2 suppresses expression of inflammatory factors via Hsp90-glucocorticoid receptor signalling,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 24, no. 13, pp. 7439–7450, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. H. Eo, D. W. Kim, S. Y. Choi, H. A. Kim, and S. J. Kim, “PEP-1-SIRT2 causes dedifferentiation and COX-2 expression via the MAPK pathways in rabbit articular chondrocytes,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 339, no. 2, pp. 351–359, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Jiao, Y. Wang, W. Zhang et al., “AGK2 alleviates lipopolysaccharide induced neuroinflammation through regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase-1,” Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 196–208, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Z. Jiao, Y. Wang, W. B. Zhang et al., “Protective role of AGK2 on thioacetamide-induced acute liver failure in mice,” Life Sciences, vol. 230, pp. 68–75, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. J. Jung, W. Park, K. P. Kang, and W. Kim, “SIRT2 is involved in cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury through regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase-1,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 1145–1156, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. He, H. H. Chiang, H. Luo et al., “An acetylation switch of the NLRP3 inflammasome regulates aging-associated chronic inflammation and insulin resistance,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 580–591, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Gomes, T. Fleming Outeiro, and C. Cavadas, “Emerging role of sirtuin 2 in the regulation of mammalian metabolism,” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 756–768, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Sarikhani, S. Mishra, P. A. Desingu et al., “SIRT2 regulates oxidative stress-induced cell death through deacetylation of c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase,” Cell Death & Differentiation, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1638–1656, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Mazereeuw, N. Herrmann, A. C. Andreazza et al., “Baseline oxidative stress is associated with memory changes in omega-3 fatty acid treated coronary artery disease patients,” Cardiovascular Psychiatry and Neurology, vol. 2017, Article ID 3674371, 7 pages, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Wang, C. H. Chan, K. Chen, X. Guan, H. K. Lin, and Q. Tong, “Deacetylation of FOXO3 by SIRT1 or SIRT2 leads to Skp2-mediated FOXO3 ubiquitination and degradation,” Oncogene, vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 1546–1557, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Wang, M. Nguyen, F. X. F. Qin, and Q. Tong, “SIRT2 deacetylates FOXO3a in response to oxidative stress and caloric restriction,” Aging Cell, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 505–514, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Singh, P. S. Hanson, and C. M. Morris, “Sirtuin-2 protects neural cells from oxidative stress and is elevated in neurodegeneration,” Parkinson’s Disease, vol. 2017, Article ID 2643587, 17 pages, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Yang, Y. Peng, W. Liu, M. Zhou, Q. Meng, and C. Yuan, “Sirtuin 2 expression suppresses oxidative stress and senescence of nucleus pulposus cells through inhibition of the p53/p21 pathway,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 513, no. 3, pp. 616–622, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Shi, Y. Zhang, J. Zhang et al., “MiR-339 is a potential biomarker of coronary heart disease to aggravate oxidative stress through Nrf2/FOXO3 targeting Sirt2,” Annals of Palliative Medicine, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 2596–2609, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Q. Liu, K. Ren, S. H. Liu, W. M. Li, C. J. Huang, and X. H. Yang, “MicroRNA-140-5p aggravates hypertension and oxidative stress of atherosclerosis via targeting Nrf2 and Sirt2,” International Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 839–849, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Zhao, X. Tao, Y. Qi, L. Xu, L. Yin, and J. Peng, “Protective effect of dioscin against doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity via adjusting microRNA-140-5p-mediated myocardial oxidative stress,” Redox Biology, vol. 16, pp. 189–198, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Zhao, X. Zhang, X. Tao et al., “Sirt2 in the spinal cord regulates chronic neuropathic pain through Nrf2-mediated oxidative stress pathway in rats,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 12, Article ID 646477, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. K. Singh, G. Chhabra, M. A. Ndiaye, L. M. Garcia-Peterson, N. J. Mack, and N. Ahmad, “The role of sirtuins in antioxidant and redox signaling,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 643–661, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kitada, Y. Ogura, I. Monno, and D. Koya, “Sirtuins and type 2 diabetes: role in inflammation, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial function,” Frontiers in Endocrinology, vol. 10, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. P. Wang, L. S. Zhou, Y. Z. Zhao et al., “Regulation of G6PD acetylation by SIRT2 and KAT9 modulates NADPH homeostasis and cell survival during oxidative stress,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 1304–1320, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. de Angelis, D. Amatore, P. Checconi et al., “Influenza virus down-modulates G6PD expression and activity to induce oxidative stress and promote its replication,” Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, vol. 11, Article ID 804976, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Xu, F. Li, L. Lv et al., “Oxidative stress activates SIRT2 to deacetylate and stimulate phosphoglycerate mutase,” Cancer Research, vol. 74, no. 13, pp. 3630–3642, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Morgan and Z. G. Liu, “Crosstalk of reactive oxygen species and NF-κB signaling,” Cell Research, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 103–115, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Zhang, Y. Zhang, B. Wu et al., “Deacetylation-dependent regulation of PARP1 by SIRT2 dictates ubiquitination of PARP1 in oxidative stress-induced vascular injury,” Redox Biology, vol. 47, Article ID 102141, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Zhang, Y. Zhang, W. Miao et al., “An unexpected role for BAG3 in regulating PARP1 ubiquitination in oxidative stress-related endothelial damage,” Redox Biology, vol. 50, Article ID 102238, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. T. Lin and M. F. Beal, “Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in neurodegenerative diseases,” Nature, vol. 443, no. 7113, pp. 787–795, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. G. McWilliams and I. G. Ganley, “Life in lights: tracking mitochondrial delivery to lysosomes in vivo,” Autophagy, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 2506-2507, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Pandithage, R. Lilischkis, K. Harting et al., “The regulation of SIRT2 function by cyclin-dependent kinases affects cell motility,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 180, no. 5, pp. 915–929, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Zhu, L. Zhao, E. Wang et al., “The QKI-PLP pathway controls SIRT2 abundance in CNS myelin,” Glia, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 69–82, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Luthi-Carter, D. M. Taylor, J. Pallos et al., “SIRT2 inhibition achieves neuroprotection by decreasing sterol biosynthesis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, vol. 107, no. 17, pp. 7927–7932, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. M. de Oliveira, J. Sarkander, A. G. Kazantsev, and T. F. Outeiro, “SIRT2 as a therapeutic target for age-related disorders,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 3, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Yuan, Z. M. Xu, L. Y. Lu et al., “SIRT2 inhibition exacerbates neuroinflammation and blood-brain barrier disruption in experimental traumatic brain injury by enhancing NF-κB p65 acetylation and activation,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 136, no. 3, pp. 581–593, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Gao, Y. Li, and R. Song, “SIRT2 inhibition exacerbates p53-mediated ferroptosis in mice following experimental traumatic brain injury,” NeuroReport, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 1001–1008, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhang, Q. Yan, and Y. Zhang, “Overexpression of sirtuin 2 and its association with prognosis in acute ischemic stroke patients,” Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, vol. 35, no. 4, Article ID e23707, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Mei, X. Zhang, J. Yi, J. Huang, J. He, and Y. Tao, “Sirtuins in metabolism, DNA repair and cancer,” Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 35, no. 1, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Li, M. Zhang, R. G. Dorfman et al., “SIRT2 promotes the migration and invasion of gastric cancer through RAS/ERK/JNK/MMP-9 pathway by increasing PEPCK1-related metabolism,” Neoplasia, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 745–756, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Wang, J. Wu, L. Wang, X. Min, and Z. Chen, “The LINC00152/miR-138 axis facilitates gastric cancer progression by mediating SIRT2,” Journal of Oncology, vol. 2021, Article ID 1173869, 9 pages, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Li, Y. Zhou, J. T. Kim et al., “Regulation of SIRT2 by Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in colorectal cancer cells,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research, vol. 1868, no. 4, Article ID 118966, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Zhao, Y. Mo, M. T. Li et al., “NOTCH-induced aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A1 deacetylation promotes breast cancer stem cells,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 124, no. 12, pp. 5453–5465, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Huang, Z. Zhao, D. Tang et al., “Downregulation of SIRT2 inhibits invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma by inhibiting energy metabolism,” Translational Oncology, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 917–927, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Ding, H. Chi, J. Shao et al., “Leukemia inhibitory factor receptor homodimerization mediated by acetylation of extracellular lysine promotes prostate cancer progression through the PDPK1/AKT/GCN5 axis,” Clinical and Translational Medicine, vol. 12, no. 2, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Ding and J. Hao, “Sirtuin 2 knockdown inhibits cell proliferation and RAS/ERK signaling, and promotes cell apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in multiple myeloma,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 24, no. 5, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Ni, Z. Yang, Y. L. Agbana et al., “Silent information regulator 2 promotes clear cell renal cell carcinoma progression through deacetylation and small ubiquitin-related modifier 1 modification of glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase,” Cancer Science, vol. 112, no. 10, pp. 4075–4086, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Zhao, S. W. Zou, Y. Liu et al., “Lysine-5 acetylation negatively regulates lactate dehydrogenase A and is decreased in pancreatic cancer,” Cancer Cell, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 464–476, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. H. Park, O. Ozden, G. Liu et al., “SIRT2-mediated deacetylation and tetramerization of pyruvate kinase directs glycolysis and tumor growth,” Cancer Research, vol. 76, no. 13, pp. 3802–3812, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. V. Dang, “PKM2 tyrosine phosphorylation and glutamine metabolism signal a different view of the Warburg effect,” Science Signaling, vol. 2, no. 97, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Lv, D. Li, D. Zhao et al., “Acetylation targets the M2 isoform of pyruvate kinase for degradation through chaperone-mediated autophagy and promotes tumor growth,” Molecular Cell, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 719–730, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ponnusamy, X. Zhou, Y. Yan et al., “Blocking sirtuin 1 and 2 inhibits renal interstitial fibroblast activation and attenuates renal interstitial fibrosis in obstructive nephropathy,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 350, no. 2, pp. 243–256, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Fiskus, V. Coothankandaswamy, J. Chen et al., “SIRT2 deacetylates and inhibits the peroxidase activity of peroxiredoxin-1 to sensitize breast cancer cells to oxidant stress-inducing agents,” Cancer Research, vol. 76, no. 18, pp. 5467–5478, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Wang, X. Wan, T. Yu et al., “Acetylation stabilizes phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase by disrupting the interaction of E3 ligase RNF5 to promote breast tumorigenesis,” Cell Reports, vol. 32, no. 6, Article ID 108021, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Li, S. Zheng, T. Cheng et al., “Decylubiquinone inhibits colorectal cancer growth through upregulating sirtuin2,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 12, Article ID 804265, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Wang, Y. Ye, X. Yang et al., “SIRT2-dependent IDH1 deacetylation inhibits colorectal cancer and liver metastases,” EMBO Reports, vol. 21, no. 4, Article ID e48183, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. M. Parikh, T. Elgzyri, A. Alibegovic et al., “Relationship between insulin sensitivity and gene expression in human skeletal muscle,” BMC Endocrine Disorders, vol. 21, no. 1, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Lemos, R. M. de Oliveira, L. Naia et al., “The NAD+-dependent deacetylase SIRT2 attenuates oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction and improves insulin sensitivity in hepatocytes,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 26, no. 21, pp. 4105–4117, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Zheng, J. Li, J. Sheng et al., “Haplotypes of the mutated SIRT2 promoter contributing to transcription factor binding and type 2 diabetes susceptibility,” Genes, vol. 11, no. 5, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Zhang, Y. Ma, and C. Xiang, “SIRT2 decreases atherosclerotic plaque formation in low-density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice by modulating macrophage polarization,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 97, pp. 1238–1242, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Yang, F. Gao, P. Zhang et al., “Functional genetic variants within the SIRT2 gene promoter in acute myocardial infarction,” PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 4, Article ID e0176245, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Walker, J. Chavez, O. Villet et al., “Acetylation of muscle creatine kinase negatively impacts high-energy phosphotransfer in heart failure,” JCI Insight, vol. 6, no. 3, Article ID 144301, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Zhao, C. Xue, J. Li et al., “Adiponectin agonist ADP355 ameliorates doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity by decreasing cardiomyocyte apoptosis and oxidative stress,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 533, no. 3, pp. 304–312, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Zhuang, W. Xia, D. Chen et al., “Exosomal LncRNA-NEAT1 derived from MIF-treated mesenchymal stem cells protected against doxorubicin-induced cardiac senescence through sponging miR-221-3p,” Journal of Nanobiotechnology, vol. 18, no. 1, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Tang, X. F. Chen, N. Y. Wang et al., “SIRT2 acts as a cardioprotective deacetylase in pathological cardiac hypertrophy,” Circulation, vol. 136, no. 21, pp. 2051–2067, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. L. Mei, H. B. Wang, Y. H. Hu, and L. Xiong, “CSN6 aggravates Ang II-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy via inhibiting SIRT2,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 396, no. 1, Article ID 112245, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Gu, Y. Cheng, S. Wang, T. Sun, and Z. Li, “PHD finger protein 19 promotes cardiac hypertrophy via epigenetically regulating SIRT2,” Cardiovascular Toxicology, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 451–461, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Liu, M. Kataoka, Y. Wang et al., “LncRNA LncHrt preserves cardiac metabolic homeostasis and heart function by modulating the LKB1-AMPK signaling pathway,” Basic Research in Cardiology, vol. 116, no. 1, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Zhang, D. Xu, Y. Zhang et al., “Silybin restored CYP3A expression through the sirtuin 2/nuclear factor kappa-B pathway in mouse nonalcoholic fatty liver disease,” Drug Metabolism & Disposition, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 770–779, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. J. Li, S. J. Sun, J. T. Fu et al., “NAD (+)-boosting therapy alleviates nonalcoholic fatty liver disease via stimulating a novel exerkine Fndc5/irisin,” Theranostics, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 4381–4402, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhang, X. Long, X. Ruan et al., “SIRT2-mediated deacetylation and deubiquitination of C/EBPβ prevents ethanol-induced liver injury,” Cell Discovery, vol. 7, no. 1, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Wang, H. Koh, L. Zhou et al., “Sirtuin 2 aggravates postischemic liver injury by deacetylating mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase-1,” Hepatology, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 225–236, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Chopra, L. Quinti, J. Kim et al., “The sirtuin 2 inhibitor AK-7 is neuroprotective in Huntington’s disease mouse models,” Cell Reports, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 1492–1497, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Wu, W. Lu, Z. Wei, M. Xu, and X. Liu, “Neuroprotective effect of Sirt2-specific inhibitor AK-7 against acute cerebral ischemia is P38 activation-dependent in mice,” Neuroscience, vol. 374, pp. 61–69, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Deng, M. Huang, and H. Wu, “Protective effect of limonin against doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity via activating nuclear factor - like 2 and sirtuin 2 signaling pathways,” Bioengineered, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 7975–7984, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Zhang, D. Xu, L. She et al., “Silybin inhibits NLRP3 inflammasome assembly through the NAD(+)/SIRT2 pathway in mice with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 757–767, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Zhao, Z. Zhang, J. Li et al., “Lysine acetylome study of human hepatocellular carcinoma tissues for biomarkers and therapeutic targets discovery,” Frontiers in Genetics, vol. 11, Article ID 572663, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. P. Yang, H. Q. Feng, J. C. Ma, H. Wu, C. R. Liu, and J. D. Hou, “SIRT2 expression exhibits potential to serve as a biomarker for disease surveillance and prognosis in the management of cervical cancer patients,” Medicine (Baltimore), vol. 99, no. 11, Article ID e18668, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Q. Wang, F. Yan, L. Wang et al., “Identification of new hypoxia-regulated epithelial-mesenchymal transition marker genes labeled by H3K4 acetylation,” Genes Chromosomes & Cancer, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 73–83, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. S. Anand, T. S. Rector, M. Kuskowski, J. Snider, and J. N. Cohn, “Prognostic value of soluble ST2 in the valsartan heart failure trial,” Circulation: Heart Failure, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 418–426, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Kalstad, P. L. Myhre, K. Laake et al., “Biomarkers of ageing and cardiac remodeling are associated with atrial fibrillation,” Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 213–219, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Changhui Zhu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

988

Downloads

687

Citations