Gastroenterology Research and Practice

Gastroenterology Research and Practice / 2012 / Article

Clinical Study | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 159438 |

Ilyas Tuncer, Mustafa Harman, Yasar Colak, Ismail Arslan, M. Kursad Turkdogan, "Effect of Ursodeoxycholic Acid Alone and Ursodeoxycholic Acid Plus Domperidone on Radiolucent Gallstones and Gallbladder Contractility in Humans", Gastroenterology Research and Practice, vol. 2012, Article ID 159438, 6 pages, 2012.

Effect of Ursodeoxycholic Acid Alone and Ursodeoxycholic Acid Plus Domperidone on Radiolucent Gallstones and Gallbladder Contractility in Humans

Academic Editor: Stuart Sherman
Received06 Dec 2011
Revised01 Feb 2012
Accepted01 Feb 2012
Published07 May 2012


Background/Aims. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) alone and UDCA plus domperidone on dissolution of solitary or multiple gallstones. Methods. Fifty-three patients with cholesterol gallstones were randomized into three treatment groups: group I () was given UDCA (15 mg/kg/day) alone and group II () was treated with domperidone (30 mg/day) in addition to UDCA. The control group () was followed without a medical treatment. Gallbladder volumes and ejection fractions were measured sonographically in all patients before and after treatment. Results. After 12 months of treatment, stone dissolution was found in 9 (40.9%) of the patients in group I and 7 (38.8%) of the patients in group II. The difference was statistically significant compared to controls in both treatment groups () but the two groups did not show a difference between each other (). All the patients that achieved dissolution had multiple gallstones except for one patient with a solitary stone in group I. Neither monotherapy of UDCA nor the combination with domperidone affected the ejection fraction of gallbladder. Conclusions. Combination with domperidone did not potentiate the efficacy of UDCA. It has been observed that both UDCA alone and UDCA plus domperidone treatment did not affect ejection fraction of gallbladder.

1. Introduction

Gallstones are a major cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world. The prevalence of gallstone disease in western industrialized nations is about 10–15% [13]. Although, 2/3 of all gallstones remain asymptomatic (so called silent gallstone), recurrent episodes of upper abdominal pain related to gallstones are the most common indication for the treatment of gallstones [2, 4]. Cholecystectomy is the standard and definitive treatment for symptomatic gallbladder stones and can be performed regardless of the type, number, and size of the stones [1, 5, 6]. However, some, 20%, of patients continue to suffer from pain after cholecystectomy [7].

Nonsurgical management of gallstones has made considerable progress within the past 20 years [2, 8]. Recent studies have raised the possibility that cholesterol-lowering agents that inhibit hepatic cholesterol synthesis (statins) or intestinal cholesterol absorption (ezetimibe), or drugs acting on specific nuclear receptors involved in cholesterol and bile acid homeostasis, may offer, alone or in combination, additional medical therapeutic tools for treating cholesterol gallstones [3, 5, 6]. Ursodeoxycholic acid is a bile salt that reduces the secretion of cholesterol into bile and increases cholesterol solubility. It may also improve gallbladder emptying [2, 4, 9]. Oral litholysis with UDCA induces cholesterol desaturation of bile and may lead to gallstone dissolution in patients with small, radiolucent, cholesterol-enriched stones in a functioning gallbladder with a patent cystic duct [5, 6, 10]. It has been suggested that treatment with bile acids may inhibit gallstone related-symptoms and complications even in patients in whom gallstone dissolution is incomplete [4, 7, 10].

The motility of the gallbladder is another key player in gallstone pathogenesis because enlarged fasting gallbladder volume, together with impaired postprandial and interdigestive gallbladder emptying, is frequent and distinctive features in gallstone patients [5]. Impaired gallbladder motility in patients with gallstone disease can be corrected by prokinetic drugs [11, 12]. Domperidone, a peripheral dopamine 2-receptor antagonist, regulates the motility of gallbladder, gastric, and small intestinal smooth muscle. It is rapidly absorbed after oral administration, and few side effects have been reported [1214].

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of UDCA-alone and UDCA plus domperidone on stone dissolution, fasting gallbladder volume, and gallbladder ejection fraction in solitary and multiple radiolucent gallbladder stones.

2. Methods

Seventy-five patients (64 female, 11 male; mean age: 45.5 ± 11; age range: 25–77) with asymptomatic or mild symptomatic cholesterol gallstone were enrolled in this randomized study.

Evaluation for each subject included a complete history and physical examination, complete blood count, serum cholesterol, triglycerides, aminotransferases, total bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase, serum amylase, abdominal X-rays, and abdominal ultrasound.

All gallstone patients were candidates for oral bile acid therapy (radiolucent gallstones, less than 2 cm in diameter, good gallbladder emptying, patent cystic duct, mild symptoms, and no evidence of acute cholecystitis). Fifty-eight patients had two or more gallbladder stones termed as multiple stones whereas remaining 17 patients had solitary gallbladder stones. There was no history of recent pancreatitis, cholangitis, and biliary colic in any of the patients. Patients who had a history of systemic disease, current pregnancy or lactation, alcohol, and medication were excluded.

After 12 hours overnight fast, fastening, and postprandial gallbladder volumes were measured sonographically before and 60 minutes after ingestion of a standard liquid test meal (18.4 g fat, 16 g protein, 240 kcal per 150 mL) and postprandial ejection fractions were calculated in all patients. Gallbladder volume was measured using a real-time ultrasound scanner (Toshiba SSA-270A, Japan, with a 3.75-mHz curved transducer). Sonographic studies were performed by the same investigator. Gallbladder dimension in the longitudinal, transvers, and saggittal planes were obtained. The smallest volume obtained after feeding at 60th minute was determined as postprandial (or residual) gallbladder volume. Gallbladder volume and ejection fraction were determined using the following formulas [15]: = gallbladder volume, = saggittal length, = width, = axial height, = ejection fraction, = fasting gallbladder volume, = postprandial (residual) gallbladder volume at time 60 minute.

All patients gave written informed consent and the study was approved by the local research ethics committee. The patients were randomized into three treatment groups: group I () received UDCA alone (15 mg/kg/day, Ursofalk, Falk Pharma GmbH, Germany); group II () received UDCA plus 30 mg/day domperidone (Motilium, Janssen-Cilag, Turkey). The control group () was followed without a medical treatment.

The physical examination and blood samples were repeated in each patient in 3-month intervals during the treatment period. In addition, gallbladder motility and gallstone dissolution rates at the third, sixth, ninth and the twelfth months were evaluated by ultrasonography in all patients.

Patients were not allowed to take any other drugs affecting biliary lipids or cholesterol biosynthesis. Patients were excluded from the study if they exhibited any abnormality of gallbladder, bile duct, or pancreatic function as determined by X-ray or ultrasonography. The treatments were discontinued at the 6th month if stone dissolution was not achieved.

Results are presented as mean values ± standard deviation (x ± SD). For statistical comparison of the three groups before and after treatment one-way ANOVA variance analysis was used. Within group analysis for comparison before and after treatments was performed with paired-student’s t-test. Stone dissolution rates were compared with chi-square test. The difference was considered statistically significant if the value was less than 0.05.

3. Results

Six patients in group I, nine patients in group II were dropped out of the study because of nonattendance or incompatibility with the treatments. In addition, 2 patients in group I were excluded from the study due to severe biliary colic in one and acute edematous pancreatitis in the other. Three patients in group II and two patients in group III underwent urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and therefore excluded. The final analysis was performed with 22 patients (18 female, 4 male) from the UDCA group, 18 patients (16 female, 2 male) from UDCA plus domperidone group, and 13 patients (11 female, 2 male) from the control group. There were no statistically significant differences between groups regarding demographic, clinical and laboratory data on admission. The patient characteristics are presented in Table 1.

( )
UDCA and domperidone ( )Control ( )

Mean age
Gender (F/M)
BMI (kg/m2)
Glucose (mg/dL)
Cholesterol (mg/dL)
HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL)
LDL-cholesterol (mg/dL)
Triglyceride (mg/dL)
Solitary stone642
Diameters of solitary stones (mm)
Multiple stone161411
FGVav (mL)
RGVav (mL)
EFav (%)

*Results are expressed as mean ± SD.
BMI: body mass index; FGVav: average fasting gallbladder volume; RGVav: average residual gallbladder volume; EFav: average ejection fraction.

At the end of the treatment period of 12 months, complete stone clearance was achieved in 9 (40.9%) of the patients in UDCA group and in 7 (38.8%) of the patients in UDCA plus domperidone. The difference was statistically significant compared to controls for both treatment groups () but the two groups did not show a difference between each other (). Of the 16 cases that achieved dissolution, all had multiple gallstones except for one in UDCA group. Solitary gallstones did not disappear in any subject treated with UDCA plus domperidone combination (Figure 1 and Table 2). The gallstone dissolution rate at 12 months was not higher for UDCA plus domperidone than treatment with UDCA-alone. Gallstones were not dissolved in any subject in control group.

ParametersUDCA aloneUDCA and domperidone
Solitary ( )Multiple ( )Solitary ( )Multiple ( )
SDΦ (+) SD (−) SD (+) SD (−) SD (+) SD (−) SD (+) SD (−)

Age (mean) 35
Gender (F/M)
BMI (kg/m2)283128.52928.52727
SSav (mm)71314.8
FGVav (mL) 23.6
EFav (%) 69.7

*Results are expressed as mean ± SD.
ΦSD: stone dissolution; BMI: body mass index; SSav: average stone size; FGVav: average fasting gallbladder volume; EFav: average gallbladder ejection fraction.

At the end of the treatment period, no significant differences in terms of fasting and postprandial gallbladder volumes were observed between the groups. Similarly, gallbladder ejection fraction before and after the end of treatment was similar for all three groups () (Table 3).

ParametersUDCA aloneUDCA and domperidone

BMI (kg/m2) NS NS
Glucose (mg/dL) NS NS
Cholesterol (mg/dL) NS NS
HDL-Cholesterol (mg/dL) NS NS
LDL-Cholesterol (mg/dL) NS NS
Triglyceride (mg/dL) NS NS
Solitary stone65NS44NS
Multiple stone168NS147NS
FGVav (mL) NS NS
RGVav (mL) NS NS
EFav (%) NS NS

*Results are expressed as mean ± SD.
BMI: body mass index; FGVav: average fasting gallbladder volume; RGVav: average residual gallbladder volume; EFav: average ejection fraction.
NS: not significant.

Laboratory tests including serum alkaline phosphatase, cholesterol, aspartate, and alanine aminotransferase were measured monthly, and results of these tests showed no change during the treatment periods in all groups (Table 3).

Both regimens showed no significant difference in terms of side effects or drop-out rate. UDCA and domperidone were generally tolerated quite well. The drugs did not cause any severe gastrointestinal or other side effects that required hospitalisation. The only significant side effect was a mild-to-moderate upper-right quadrant pain sometimes necessitating spasmolytics without any laboratory abnormality in 4 cases in UDCA group and 2 cases in the combination group, all of which had successful stone dissolution. There was a remarkable decrease in symptoms in patients that achieved stone dissolution. In patients with partial stone dissolution UDCA therapy was continued beyond the study period.

4. Discussion

Cholelithiasis is one of the most common and costly digestive diseases. Gallstones are usually asymptomatic and no treatment is generally required and laparoscopic cholecystectomy is first-line therapy for symptomatic gallstones [6, 7]. So far, UDCA has been recommended as first-line pharmacological therapy in a subgroup of symptomatic patients with small, radiolucent cholesterol gallstones in a functioning gallbladder with a patent cystic duct, and its long-term administration has been shown to promote the dissolution of cholesterol gallstones [3, 5, 6]. Therapy with bile salts is suitable for only a minority of patients with symptomatic cholesterol gallstones who refuse surgery or have an increased surgical risk [2, 10, 16]. UDCA reduces the synthesis of cholesterol in the liver and its secretion into bile. UDCA also prolongs the nucleation time of gallbladder bile by shifting cholesterol from vesicles to micelles [2, 10, 17].

The therapeutic success of the medical dissolution of gallstones depends substantially on the following factors: (i) patient selection, (ii) dosage of bile acid, and (iii) therapy duration. The ideal patient to be treated by medical therapy is mildly symptomatic, non-obese, with functioning gallbladder and with radiolucent, floating stones, not larger than 5 mm in diameter [10, 18, 19].

In the current study, we achieved complete gallstone dissolution rates of 40.9% with UDCA and 38.8% with combination therapy at 12 months. Stone dissolution rate was higher in patients with multiple stones compared to those with solitary stones but this difference was not statistically significant. Combination of UDCA with domperidone did not improve complete gallstone dissolution rate, gallbladder fasting volume, and gallbladder ejection fraction. In both treatment groups, the use of UDCA reduced incidence of biliary pain. Stone dissolution rates were increased with the lengthening of treatment periods. Younger patients demonstrated higher rates of dissolution compared to elderly subjects. The only solitary stone dissolved with the treatment was 7 mm diameter (see Figure 1, Table 2).

Based on a simple correlation with the gallstone dissolution rate, small size, radiolucency of gallstone, and preserved gallbladder function have been listed as indication criteria for UDCA therapy. Size rather than number of stones is the primary determinant of the dissolution rate [18, 20, 21]. Gallstones smaller than 5 mm show a better dissolution rate than those exceeding 5 mm [20]. Stones of less than 5 mm diameter can be dissolved in almost 79% of cases, whereas the success rates drop to roughly one-third with stones larger than 10 mm in diameter [10, 18]. With stones more than 15–20 mm diameter, the dissolution time is extremely long [10]. Studies using strict inclusion criteria have found dissolution rates of 50 to 60%. However, dissolution rates as low as 23% have been reported in less well-selected populations [9]. UDCA therapy can be useful in patients with biliary sludge or microlithiasis, especially if recently developed [18]. UDCA completely dissolved the stones in 37% of all patients [16]. Jazrawi et al. [22] have found complete stone dissolution as 78% with UDCA treatment at the end of 6 months, whereas Schoenfield and Marks [23] reported a success rate of 50% at the end of 24 months. On the other hand, Bazzoli et al. [24] achieved a stone dissolution rate of as low as 13% at the end of 6 months. The wide variation in the reported response rates can be attributable to differences in patient selection, doses of bile acid, treatment duration, and the diagnostic techniques used to document complete stone dissolution [16].

In previous studies different results have been reported about the effects of UDCA alone or in combination with other drugs. Combination of UDCA with chenodeoxycholic acid therapy enhances the biliary levels of UDCA [25]. Zuin et al. [26] have obtained gallstone dissolution rate of 83% with UDCA plus chenodeoxycholic acid combination in 12 months, whereas Petroni et al. [27] obtained a 30% dissolution rate with the same combination over 24 months. Moreover, Tazuma et al. [28] have found 70% stone dissolution in multiple stones and 25% in solitary stones after 12 months treatment with UDCA. In the same study, combination with simvastatin was not proved superior compared to UDCA treatment alone and was not proved superior for solitary stones. In our study stone dissolution rate was lower than those reported by Tazuma et al. [28]. As in previous studies, we failed to show superiority of combination therapy over UDCA-alone treatment on dissolution of multiple or solitary stones.

Gallbladder emptying abnormalities are common in patients with gallstones, and it has been hypothesized that they contribute to the increased incidence of gallbladder stones [4]. In the treatment of gastrointestinal motility disorders 3 prokinetic agents (metoclopramide, domperidone, and cisapride) have mainly been used. They are differentiated from their pharmacological mode of action, their clinical efficacy, and tolerability. Domperidone is a pure dopamine receptor antagonist. It antagonizes noradrenaline- and dopamine-induced relaxations of smooth muscles [29]. We wondered whether the therapeutic effects of domperidone and UDCA in gallstone disease might be mediated by changes in gallbladder contractility. In our study, we found that neither the UDCA nor domperidone altered fasting gallbladder volume and ejection fraction in patients with gallstone at the end of 12 months. Our findings suggest that the dissolution of gallstones during oral bile acid administration is not paralleled by an improvement in gallbladder function. In the literature, different results have been reported about the effects of prokinetics drugs on gallbladder motility. Tankurt et al. [12] and Nakayama et al. [30] demonstrated that domperidone increases gallbladder contractility in healthy subjects in contrast to Mangiameli et al. [13] who showed that domperidone has no effect on contractility. In studies performed with cisapride, Kapicioglu et al. [31] demonstrated that this drug did not change the fasting mean gallbladder volume as compared to the baseline in the healthy subjects. However, this study showed that the administration of cisapride causes gallbladder volume reduction in diabetic patients. Differently, Gürsoy et al. [32] showed that cisapride did not change the contractility of gallbladder in diabetic patients. Recently proposed some molecular mechanisms bring up alternative treatments for bile stones. For example, the human apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter (hASBT) plays a critical role in the enterohepatic circulation of bile acids and cholesterol homeostasis whose expression is regulated by FXR [33, 34]. Therefore, the use of FXR agonists could have potential therapeutic applications in hypercholesterolemia and in cholestasis, but not in cholesterol gallstone therapy.

We conclude that UDCA treatment should be preferred for patients with small multiple gallstones and that administration of combined UDCA and domperidone is not likely to provide an effective combination. Gallbladder fasting volume and ejection fraction did not change at the end of gallstone dissolution treatment in radiolucent gallstone patients. We also demonstrate that UDCA and domperidone combination have no effect on gallbladder contractility in patients with gallstone.

In conclusion, we found higher dissolution rates in patients with multiple stones compared to these with solitary stones as in previous studies. Younger patient age and longer treatment periods increased the chance of successful treatment. Long-term medical treatment with bile salts may help to reduce gallstone-related complications and need for surgery especially in multiple gallstones in which both the risk of complication and the benefit of therapy are greatest.

Conflict of Interests

Authors disclose no conflict of interests regarding this paper.


  1. L. Barbara, C. Sama, A. M. M. Labate et al., “A population study on the prevalence of gallstone disease: the Sirmione study,” Hepatology, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 913–917, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  2. D. E. Johnston and M. M. Kaplan, “Pathogenesis and treatment of gallstones,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 328, no. 6, pp. 412–421, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. A. Di Ciaula, D. Q. H. Wang, H. H. Wang, L. Bonfrate, and P. Portincasa, “Targets for current pharmacologic therapy in cholesterol gallstone disease,” Gastroenterology Clinics of North America, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 245–264, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. R. K. Sterling and M. L. Shiffman, “Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and gallstone disease: will an aspirin a day keep the gallstones away?” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 93, no. 9, pp. 1405–1407, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. H. H. Wang, P. Portincasa, N. Mendez-Sanchez, M. Uribe, and D. Q. H. Wang, “Effect of ezetimibe on the prevention and dissolution of cholesterol gallstones,” Gastroenterology, vol. 134, no. 7, pp. 2101–2110, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. H. H. Wang, P. Portincasa, N. Mendez-Sanchez, M. Uribe, and D. Q. Wang, “Medicinal treatments of cholesterol gallstones: old, current and new perspectives,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 1531–1542, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. F. M. Konikoff, “Gallstones—approach to medical management,” MedGenMed, vol. 5, no. 4, article 8, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  8. T. Sauerbruch and M. Neubrand, “Nonsurgical management of gallstones,” Progress in liver diseases, vol. 10, pp. 193–218, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  9. R. A. Rubin, T. E. Kowalski, M. Khandelwal, and P. F. Malet, “Ursodiol for hepatobiliary disorders,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 207–218, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  10. M. C. Bateson, “Fortnightly review: gallbladder disease,” British Medical Journal, vol. 318, no. 7200, pp. 1745–1748, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  11. P. Portincasa, P. van de Meeberg, K. J. van Erpecum, G. Palasciano, and G. P. VanBerge-Henegouwen, “An update on the pathogenesisi and treatment of cholesterol stones,” Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 223, pp. 60–69, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  12. E. Tankurt, S. Apaydin, E. Ellidokuz et al., “The prokinetic effect of domperidone in gallbladder - not upon dopaminergic receptors,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 34, no. 3-4, pp. 153–156, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. Mangiameli, A. Brogna, R. Catanzaro, M. Sofia, and A. Blasi, “Levosulpiride vs domperidone for functional dyspepsia,” Clinica Terapeutica, vol. 144, no. 2, pp. 107–114, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  14. M. C. Champion, M. Hartnett, and M. Yen, “Domperidone, a new dopamine antagonist,” Canadian Medical Association Journal, vol. 135, no. 5, pp. 457–461, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  15. F. E. Murray, S. J. Stinchcombe, and C. J. Hawkey, “Effect of indomethacin and misoprostol on fasted gallbladder volume and meal-induced gallbladder contractility in humans,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1228–1231, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  16. G. Paumgartner, “Nonsugical management of gallstone disease,” in Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease, M. Feldman, L. S. Friedman, and M. H. Sleisenger, Eds., pp. 1107–1115, Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 7th edition, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  17. I. Hirota, K. Chijiiwa, H. Noshiro, and F. Nakayama, “Effect of chenodeoxycholate and ursodeoxycholate on nucleation time in human gallbladder bile,” Gastroenterology, vol. 102, no. 5, pp. 1668–1674, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  18. M. Angelico, “The medical therapy of cholelithiasis. Critical reflections,” Annali Italiani di Chirurgia, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 709–711, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  19. K. A. Hood, D. C. Ruppin, and R. H. Dowling, “Gall stone recurrence and its prevention: the British/Belgian gall stone study group's post-dissolution trial,” Gut, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 1277–1288, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  20. Tokyo Cooperative Gallstone Study Group, “Efficacy and indications of ursodeoxycholic acid treatment for dissolving gallstones,” Gastroenterology, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 542–548, 1980. View at: Google Scholar
  21. G. R. May, L. R. Sutherland, and E. A. Shaffer, “Efficacy of bile acid therapy for gallstone dissolution: a meta-analysis of randomized trials,” Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 139–148, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  22. R. P. Jazrawi, M. G. Pigozzi, G. Galatola, A. Lanzini, and T. C. Northfield, “Optimum bile acid treatment for rapid gall stone dissolution,” Gut, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 381–386, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  23. L. J. Schoenfield and J. W. Marks, “Oral and contact dissolution of gallstones,” American Journal of Surgery, vol. 165, no. 4, pp. 427–430, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  24. F. Bazzoli, D. Festi, G. Mazzella et al., “Acquired gallstone opacification during cholelitholytic treatment with chenodeoscyholic, ursodeoxycholic, and tauroursodeoxycholic acids,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 90, no. 6, pp. 978–981, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  25. M. Podda, M. Zuin, N. Dioguardi et al., “A combination of chenodeoxycholic acid and ursodeoxycholic acid is more effective than either alone in reducing biliary cholesterol saturation,” Hepatology, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 334–339, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  26. M. Zuin, M. L. Petroni, G. Grandinetti et al., “Comparison of effects of chenodeoxycholic and ursodeoxycholic acid and their combination on biliary lipids in obese patients with gallstones,” Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 257–262, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  27. M. L. Petroni, R. P. Jazrawi, P. Pazzi et al., “Ursodeoxycholic acid alone or with chenodeoxycholic acid for dissolution of cholesterol gallstones: a randomized multicentre trial,” Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 123–128, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. S. Tazuma, G. Kajiyama, T. Mizuno et al., “A combination therapy with simvastatin and ursodeoxycholic acid is more effective for cholesterol gallstone dissolution than is ursodeoxycholic acid monotherapy,” Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 287–291, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. H. Kilbinger and T. R. Weihrauch, “Drugs increasing gastrointestinal motility,” Pharmacology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 61–72, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  30. S. Nakayama, T. Neya, and T. Yamasato, “Effects of domperidone on gastrointestinal and gallbladder motility and gastric emptying,” Nippon Heikatsukin Gakkai Zasshi, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 327–335, 1979. View at: Google Scholar
  31. S. Kapicioglu, O. Senturk, N. Bambul, and K. Ilgun, “Action of cisapride on gallbladder contraction in patients with diabetes mellitus,” Hepatogastroenterology, vol. 45, no. 23, pp. 1410–1414, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  32. M. Gürsoy, N. Güvener, I. Isiklar, E. Tutal, B. Ozin, and S. Boyacioglu, “The effect of cisaprid on gallbladder contractility in type II diabetic patients,” Hepatogastroenterology, vol. 48, no. 41, pp. 1262–1265, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  33. C. J. Sinal, M. Tohkin, M. Miyata, J. M. Ward, G. Lambert, and F. J. Gonzalez, “Targeted disruption of the nuclear receptor FXR/BAR impairs bile acid and lipid homeostasis,” Cell, vol. 102, no. 6, pp. 731–744, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  34. M. Montagnani, A. Marangoni, A. Roda et al., “Generation of a novel antibody probe to the apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter that inhibits ileal bile acid absorption,” Molecular Pharmaceutics, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1012–1018, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2012 Ilyas Tuncer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles