Gastroenterology Research and Practice

Gastroenterology Research and Practice / 2015 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 476215 |

N. Gurukripa Kowlgi, Lovely Chhabra, "D-Lactic Acidosis: An Underrecognized Complication of Short Bowel Syndrome", Gastroenterology Research and Practice, vol. 2015, Article ID 476215, 8 pages, 2015.

D-Lactic Acidosis: An Underrecognized Complication of Short Bowel Syndrome

Academic Editor: Anastasios Koulaouzidis
Received26 Nov 2014
Revised28 Mar 2015
Accepted08 Apr 2015
Published22 Apr 2015


D-lactic acidosis or D-lactate encephalopathy is a rare condition that occurs primarily in individuals who have a history of short bowel syndrome. The unabsorbed carbohydrates act as a substrate for colonic bacteria to form D-lactic acid among other organic acids. The acidic pH generated as a result of D-lactate production further propagates production of D-lactic acid, hence giving rise to a vicious cycle. D-lactic acid accumulation in the blood can cause neurologic symptoms such as delirium, ataxia, and slurred speech. Diagnosis is made by a combination of clinical and laboratory data including special assays for D-lactate. Treatment includes correcting the acidosis and decreasing substrate for D-lactate such as carbohydrates in meals. In addition, antibiotics can be used to clear colonic flora. Although newer techniques for diagnosis and treatment are being developed, clinical diagnosis still holds paramount importance, as there can be many confounders in the diagnosis as will be discussed subsequently.

1. Introduction

D-lactic acidosis (D-la) is a rare form of lactic acidosis seen mostly in patients with short bowel syndrome (SBS). Other conditions implicated are toxic ingestions of chemicals such as propylene glycol and rarely in patients with severe diabetic ketoacidosis. D-lactic acid is an enantiomer of L-lactic acid. L-lactic acid is the main entity involved in lactic acidosis in humans. Historically, D-la has been more commonly described in ruminants, with infrequent occurrence in humans [1]. The condition was first described in 1979 by Oh et al. [2] in a patient with SBS afflicted with severe metabolic acidosis and encephalopathy. SBS is a result of extensive surgical resection of the intestine, leading to malabsorption-induced diarrhea, electrolyte disturbances, and malnutrition due to poor nutrient processing [3]. The incidence of SBS can vary geographically, but the overall estimated incidence is approximately 2 persons per million per year [4].

The predominant organ system affected by D-la is the central nervous system (CNS). Presenting symptoms may include slurred speech, ataxia, altered mental status, psychosis, or even coma [2, 510]. A high index of clinical suspicion is the key in diagnosing D-la in patients with elevated anion gap metabolic acidosis, with normal L-lactate levels, history of SBS, and the above-described clinical features. This paper includes a comprehensive review of the etiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic techniques, and treatment modalities of D-la in patients with SBS.

2. Materials and Methods

In the preparation for this paper, we performed a PubMed and MEDLINE search of the published work in English language to identify case reports, review articles, research studies, and meta-analyses, on D-la in relation to SBS. Key words used were, “D-lact*,” “malabsorp*,” “short bowel,” “short gut,” “bowel surg*,” “bowel resect*,” “colectomy,” “ileal resect*,” “Colon resect*,” “colonic resec*,” “ileal surg*,” “colon surg*,” “gut surg*,” and “bariatric surg*” which yielded 91 articles. Papers from January 1, 1979, to September 30, 2014, were included. Articles that fulfilled the criteria for adequate information including patient characteristics, presence of SBS, pathogenesis, clinical features, and management options of D-la were reviewed. Selected references from the original set of articles were included in the bibliography. For this paper, we selected 32 articles, based on the aforementioned criteria, which were relevant to our current discussion.

3. Objectives

This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of D-la utilizing the reported data in the literature and urges readers to recognize D-la in appropriate clinical settings. We also discuss in detail the diagnostic and therapeutic principles which aim to prevent the untoward consequences of D-la.

4. Pathophysiology of D-Lactic Acidosis

A Swedish chemist named Scheele is credited with the discovery of 2-hydroxypropanoate or lactic acid from sour milk [11]. Lactic acid exists as two enantiomers/stereoisomers, based on the orientation around its asymmetric second carbon atom. These are D (dextrorotatory) and L (levorotatory) types, based on the rotation of light in clockwise and counter-clockwise directions, respectively [12]. Normally, lactic acid exists entirely in L-lactate form (with a concentration of 1-2 mmol/L) as mammalian cells almost exclusively produce this form. The reason for this is the lack of the enzyme D-lactic acid dehydrogenase [13]. However, D-lactate can be formed in miniscule concentrations from methylglyoxal via the glyoxalase pathway [14].

Some fermented foods and beverages such as pickles, yogurt, sour milk, tomatoes, apples, beer, and wine can also increase D-lactic acid [15, 16]. The aforementioned mechanism is relevant to our discussion of D-la in patients with SBS. Compounds such as ringer lactate solution, sodium lactate, propylene glycol, and some peritoneal dialysate solutions can also cause D-la [14, 17]. Notably, both D and L-lactate can be produced by the microbiota in the gastrointestinal tract and the sole determinant of this is the amount of D or L-lactate dehydrogenase present in the bacterial flora of an individual [18]. Varying amounts of D and L-lactate can be formed depending on the relative concentration and biological activity of different bacterial species. Additionally, some bacteria have an enzyme DL-lactate racemase, which can convert one enantiomer to the other [18]. Originally, it was believed that due to the lack of enzyme D-lactate dehydrogenase in humans, we could not metabolize D-lactate to pyruvate. However, in the past two decades there is an abundance of literature suggesting the presence of an enzyme D-2-hydroxy acid dehydrogenase (D-2-HDH) that is mainly found in the liver and kidney [15, 1722]. This enzyme is inhibited by low-pH states, which assumes importance in the relative overproduction of D-lactate in certain clinical situations and has been discussed in details later.

The production of D-lactate in the gut is precipitated by two factors: the first is the absence or reduced length of the small intestine which is normally responsible for the absorption of most simple carbohydrates; and the second is the presence of colon in continuity where all the unabsorbed carbohydrates are presented as a substrate for fermentation to the colonic bacterial flora. In healthy individuals, only dietary fiber, starch, and possibly a small amount of undigested mono- or disaccharides reach the colon where they are fermented and metabolized to organic acids. Usually, the rate of production of these organic acids does not exceed the rate of metabolism and hence, does not lead to clinically significant acidemia [23]. These organic acids mainly consist of acetate, propionate, and butyrate, collectively known as short-chain fatty acids (SCFA). These serve as the principal energy source of colonic mucosal cells, and even for the rest of the body at times. Fermentation of undigested carbohydrates eventually yields a very low concentration of D- and L-lactate [24] as they are metabolized to SCFA at a rate equaling their production [23].

Alteration of the colonic microbiota plays a major role in the production of D-lactate. Short bowel syndrome leads to an increased load of undigested carbohydrates (including simple sugars) in the colon. As a result, the amount of organic acid produced exceeds the amount that can be metabolized by healthy individuals. This leads to an accumulation of organic acids, including SCFA and lactate, resulting in a more acidic environment than normal. Interestingly, the lower pH favors the growth of bacteria responsible for producing D- and L-lactate as they are acid-resistant and this leads to a further decrease in the pH thus generating a vicious cycle. These bacteria include Lactobacillus fermenti and L. acidophilus amongst a few others [25, 26]. As mentioned previously, the primary enzyme responsible for metabolizing D-lactate in humans is D-2-HDH, which is inhibited in the acidic environment. Caldarini et al. [27] demonstrated this in an in vitro study performed on stool samples of a child. Thus, SBS leads to initiation and propagation of D-lactic acid formation.

The studies in infants have shown that, with development of SBS, it takes only 2-3 weeks of oral feeding to produce a dramatic change in their intestinal flora specifically lactate-producing lactobacillus, which increases from 1% to 60% [28, 29]. In spite of this dramatic change, it takes several months to years for the development of significant D-lactate in stool. Thus, it has been hypothesized that the establishment of new flora requires a significant length of time-period to take its effect [28]. Other conditions that can mimic SBS in producing the complications of D-la include inflammatory disease of the small bowel, especially Crohn’s disease, antibiotics, and even probiotics that can alter the existing flora of the colon. Specific case reports are described in Table 1.

Author/yearPatientsAge/sexCause of D-laComments/clinical

Kholostova et al./2014 [44]24<2 yrs./variableSBS—ileojejunal rectal anastomosis for treatment of Hirschsprung’s diseaseFecal D-lactate increased in 35% pts.
Singh et al./2013 [45]137/MAntibiotic induced alteration of colonic flora causing recurrent D-laComplicated with new acute transient systolic CHF
Dahlquist et al./1984 [37]124/FSBS—ischemic small bowel resectionPrimarily CNS symptoms-lethargy, echolalia, ataxia
Burski et al./2013 [46]141/FSBS—bariatric surgeryConfusion (feeling drunk), slurred speech, ataxia.
Gigante et al./2012 [47]151/FSBS—partial small bowel resection, jejunoileal bypass due to Salmonella enteritidis infectionConfusion, blurred vision, slurred speech, nausea, weakness
Guerrero et al./2010 [48]135/FSBS—ileal resection due to ischemic bowelDizziness, gait instability, loss of strength
Munakata et al./2010 [42]15/FSBS—jejunoileal atresia; ileus; peritonitis
probiotic use—Bifidobacterium
Intermittent ataxia, inability to grasp objects, explosive speech
Grunert et al./2010 [49]17/MCongenital disaccharidase deficiencyFound comatose after parenteral nutrition was held, and pt. had oral meals, slurred speech
Dahhak et al./2008 [50]16/MSBS—bowel surgery indication not reportedDysarthria and disorientation
Soler Palacín et al./2006 [51]111/MSBS—multiple bowel resections in the postnatal periodConfusion, encephalopathy, slurred speech
Puwanant et al./2005 [52]114/MSBS—midgut volvulus surgery five years priorEpisodic confusion, hyperpnea
Uchida et al./2004 [53]122/MSBS—volvulus surgery at age threeSlurred speech, somnolence, gait disturbance
Zhang et al./2003 [16]112/MSBS—20 cm resection of small bowel due to volvulus11 episodes of weakness, ataxia, nausea, slurred speech, lethargy
Kamar et al./2003 [54]180/MSBS—subtotal colectomy with ileal J-pouchConfusion, disorientation, tachypnea
Azhar and Beach/2002 [55]153/FSBS—colectomy and colostomy 20 years prior to Ulcerative colitisNausea, vomiting, fatigue, diarrhea from colostomy
Angelet et al./2002 [56]1UnknownSBSNeurological symptoms
Lalive et al./2001 [57]154/—SBS—extensive small bowel surgery few months priorSeveral acute confusional episodes, ataxia, nystagmus, dysarthria
Sela et al./1999 [58]22.25/F
SBS—congenital intestinal obstructionEncephalopathy, ataxia
Day and Abbott/1999 [5]1UnknownSBSUnknown
Vella and Farrugia/1998 [33]150/FSBSRecurrent weakness, ataxia, slurred speech, confusion, nausea
Coronado et al./1995 [9]150/MSBS—Jejunoileal bypass 2 years prior, with recent doxycycline useAtaxia, slurred speech, weakness
Koletzko et al./1994 [59]19/MSBS—small intestinal duplication 2 years priorRecurrent episodes—failure to thrive, unsteady gait, slurred speech, somnolence
Gurevitch et al./1993 [60]11.6 yrs.SBS—midgut volvulusEncephalopathy syndrome
Forsyth et al./1991 [61]1UnknownSBS—jejunal atresiaRecurrent encephalopathy, treated with neomycin
Flourie et al./1990 [35]124/M SBS—recent treatment with BactrimNeurological symptoms
Scully et al./1989 [31]116/MSBS—small bowel ischemia from stab woundsHeadache, confusion, stupor, dysarthria
Rosenthal and Pesce/1985 [62]12.5/MSBS—midgut volvulusAtaxia, lethargy
Haan et al./1985 [63]18/MSBSDepression, slurred speech, confusion, aggressive behavior intermittently
Traube et al./1983 [64]140/MSBS—jejunoileal bypassBizarre behavior, slurred speech, ataxic gait
Satoh et al./1982 [65]2UnknownSBSUnknown
Schoorel et al./1980 [66]13/MSBSConfusion, dyspnea, drowsiness
Oh et al./1979 [2]130/MSBS—ischemic bowelSlurred speech, confusion

5. Review of Clinical Features of D-Lactic Acidosis

All cases of D-la described in this review had a history of SBS due to various causes including ischemic bowel, intestinal obstruction, congenital abnormalities, and midgut volvulus. There is an obvious domination of neurological symptoms in patients with D-la (Table 2). As evident from Tables 1 and 2, all patients exhibit some form of encephalopathy and this may pose a diagnostic challenge for clinicians since the presentation can often be confused with a primary neurological disorder. The primary neurological symptoms occurring in D-la are often attributed to acidosis. However, there have been reports refuting this causal association. Godey et al. [30] described a case of a 2-year-old female who was diagnosed with lactic acidosis and neurological symptoms. Patient had recurrences of neurological symptoms with elevated D-lactate but without significant acidosis 6 months from the original diagnosis.

PresentationPercentage of patients

Slurred speech52
Gait disturbance29
Aggressive behavior10
Acute CHF3
Blurry vision3
Explosive speech 3
“Feeling drunk”3

In one of the first cases describing D-la in 1979, Oh et al. [2] proposed that the neurological manifestations are due to a direct toxic effect on the brain resulting from D-la crossing the blood-brain barrier. A possible mechanism suggested by the authors was that the brain tissue has lower levels of the D-lactate metabolizing enzyme D-2-HDH and, hence, the D-lactate levels rise. However, despite this theoretical basis, other case reports suggest that there is no difference in the concentration of D-lactic acid in blood or cerebrospinal fluid [31]. It is important to understand that the actual levels of D-lactate do not correlate with the clinical presentation. Experimental studies performed with loading of D-lactate in healthy patients using both intravenous and oral formulations, up to twice the upper limit of normal, resulted in only a few clinical symptoms [15, 21]. Thurn et al. [32] further strengthened this hypothesis in a study of 33 patients with history of jejunoileal bypass and also found a poor correlation between D-lactate levels and clinical symptoms.

Due to the aforementioned theory, it was thought that the neurological symptoms might not be related to D-lactate but to the other organic acids produced in the colon, which could be potentially neurotoxic. These include mercaptans, aldehydes, amines, and alcohols, which can potentially act as false neurotransmitters and give rise to clinical symptoms [23].

Other possible causes could be nutritional deficiencies as patients with SBS can lose significant absorptive surface area of the gut. Hudson et al. [8] reported a case of recurrent encephalopathy secondary to D-la in a patient who was found to have elevated erythrocyte transketolase levels suggestive of thiamine deficiency. The cerebellum is a potential target for damage in D-la. This is because it has a limited supply of pyruvate dehydrogenase, the enzyme required to convert pyruvate to acetyl co-A [26]. However, as D-lactate converts to pyruvate [33], the enzyme levels are not sufficient to metabolize all the pyruvate and this, compounded with a relative thiamine deficiency, may produce neurologic symptoms akin Wernicke’s encephalopathy (confusion, ataxia, and ophthalmoplegia). Other theories include decreasing activity of pyruvate dehydrogenase with D-lactate accumulation due to a reduction in the pH [33]. While the pyruvate theory explains many of the clinical manifestations, there has been a case report of D-la where pyruvate levels were normal during acute neurological symptoms [30].

We previously discussed how SCFA are produced in the colon and serve as energy source to the colonic mucosal cells and sometimes even to the rest of the body. In cases of SBS, due to a change in microbiota, the lactate-producing bacteria tend to outgrow the ones producing SCFA. As a result, there is less acetyl-coA produced, leading to less ATP, which could affect neurotransmitter production and neurological functioning [33].

From the above discussion, it is clear that the manner in which D-lactate exerts its clinical influence is complex and there appear to be multiple factors that contribute to the outcomes. Nonetheless, this understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms should prompt a physician to identify D-la in order to implement appropriate and timely therapeutic strategies.

6. Diagnosis of D-Lactic Acidosis

Diagnosis of D-la needs a high clinical suspicion and awareness of the different presentations of the condition, especially in patients with appropriate risk factors. The diagnosis should later be confirmed with appropriate lab testing. Common symptoms are delirium/encephalopathy, slurred speech, and unstable gait amongst others (see Table 1). Some of the cases described violent behavior while others suggested a presentation similar to acute alcohol intoxication. D-la should always be suspected in a patient with SBS, inflammatory bowel disease, or other malabsorption syndromes and it typically requires the presence of a relatively intact colon. Due to the nonspecific nature of symptoms, D-la is frequently missed [34] and, hence, a high index of suspicion is warranted in the above-mentioned patient population. Recent antibiotics or even probiotics have also been implicated in a few case reports [9, 35].

Blood work typically reveals anion gap metabolic acidosis, and if delta-delta ratio is calculated, it will range between one and two unless there are other additional contributing factors to metabolic acidosis. The rise in anion gap is less than expected. This is due to the stereo specificity of D-lactate, which makes it easier for D- rather than L-lactate to be excreted in urine. It can cause both an anion gap metabolic acidosis and a hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis. Sometimes the urine anion gap may be positive, and both this and hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis may lead to a false diagnosis of renal tubular acidosis (RTA) [34]. Urine osmolar gap can be used to calculate unmeasured cations such as NH4+, which is excreted more in D-la due to systemic acidosis and can help in differentiating from RTA. Special assays are required to measure levels of D-lactate as these assays contain D-lactate dehydrogenase. During acute episodes, the levels can rise and while there is no standard, a D-lactate concentration of >3 mmol/L is used to define D-la [36].

The symptoms of D-la are often transient making a biochemical diagnosis challenging. However, clinical history such as that described above should not be ignored. Patients may often give a history of prior neurological symptoms following consumption of a meal rich in carbohydrates. In some cases, physicians have challenged their patients to an enteral carbohydrate load for reproducibility of neurological symptoms and a rise in D-lactate levels [34, 37]. Electroencephalogram is infrequently utilized, as it is nonspecific. However, in an acute state, EEG abnormalities may coincide with D-lactate levels [38]. Stool cultures that grow high concentrations of D-lactate producing bacteria indicate D-la as a cause as well.

Henry et al. [39] recently studied novel methods of determining D- and L-lactate levels in the urine using high-performance liquid chromatograph-tandem mass spectrometry. The limit of detection of D-lactate was 0.125 mmol/L. More recent studies suggest that the ratio of D-lactate/L-lactate may serve as a better metabolic signature of altered colonic microbiota, as compared to the absolute values, and thus may help in a more reliable prediction of poor clinical outcomes in patients with SBS [40].

7. Treatment of D-Lactic Acidosis

Early identification and correction of metabolic abnormalities result in an improvement in the neurological symptoms. The acuity of treatment depends on the clinical status of the patient. The treatment plan can be summed up as follows.(1)Correct acidemia.(2)Removing the offending agent (carbohydrates, propylene glycol, or exogenous D-lactate).(3)Long-term control measures.

Intravenous bicarbonate can be used with fluid hydration to correct acidemia. Lactated ringer should be avoided as it contains both D- and L-lactate. During an acute episode, enteral carbohydrates should be avoided. Not only will this decrease the D-lactate due to lack of substrate but also the lactate-producing bacteria will starve and die in the absence of a food source [29]. Carbohydrates can be supplemented parenterally and thiamine supplementation should be considered to cover for the additional pyruvate dehydrogenase activity, especially in the cerebellum. Oral antibiotics that are poorly absorbed are most effectively used locally in the gut—these include clindamycin, vancomycin, neomycin, and kanamycin [33]. In rare cases, hemodialysis has been used to rapidly clear D-lactate from the plasma [41].

Once the acute phase is controlled, strategies for preventing future occurrences must be implemented. Long-term management should focus on avoiding the substrates responsible for D-lactate production. Simple carbohydrate restriction may be useful as they are metabolized to D-lactate more rapidly [18]. Some exogenous fermented foods such as sour milk, yogurt, and pickles have D-lactate and should be avoided.

Patients with SBS have fat malabsorption and this can lead to calcium soap formation in the gut with free oxalate being absorbed with the risk of renal stones. Patients should stay well hydrated to keep up with the losses. Also oxalate can inhibit D-2-HDH, and hence oxalate intake should be limited. Small amounts of calcium supplementation (up to 1 g/day) may be beneficial. This will also increase the pH in the bowel, which could decrease D-lactate production as shown by Caldarini et al. [27]. Long-term antibiotics can be considered in patients who have repeated episodes. However, with no standard guidelines, this should be on a case-by-case basis. Evidence of probiotics in D-la is unclear and controversial. There have been reports as described above regarding probiotics being implicated as a causative agent in a few cases of D-la [42] but there are no current recommendations to avoid them.

In those rare cases, where neither dietary nor medical treatments are effective, some surgical options might be beneficial. In SBS, certain procedures include intestinal lengthening [18], small bowel transplant, or, in some extreme cases, colon removal. There are some promising novel avenues emerging for the treatment of patients with SBS. One such modality in the experimental phase is technology of scaffolding. This technique involves production of tissue engineered intestine (TEI) using nanoparticles, which can take up the function of the intestine and help prevent the complications of SBS [43]. Further studies are needed in this field before it can be used safely and effectively in humans.

8. Future Direction

D-lactic acidosis is a rare condition with adverse clinical effects fortunately manageable with safe and effective treatment strategies. One aspect aiding the diagnosis of D-la could be the role of measuring organic acids produced during pyruvate metabolism. Further research is needed to better understand the pathophysiology of the associated neurological symptoms to address our knowledge gaps on this important issue.

9. Conclusion

Although D-la is a rare entity, it can negatively impact the quality of life in patients with SBS. Physicians should be aware of the risk factors and presenting symptoms while keeping a high-index of clinical suspicion, as early detection and treatment are imperative in order to effectively manage patients with this condition.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests (financial or otherwise).


The authors are very thankful to Mr. Alan Ahlberg (Department of Cardiology Research at Hartford Hospital) for providing his editorial assistance with the paper.


  1. K. P. Kang, S. Lee, and S. K. Kang, “D-lactic acidosis in humans: review of update,” Electrolyte & Blood Pressure, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 53–56, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. M. S. Oh, K. R. Phelps, M. Traube, J. L. Barbosa-Saldivar, C. Boxhill, and H. J. Carroll, “D-Lactic acidosis in a man with the short-bowel syndrome,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 301, no. 5, pp. 249–252, 1979. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. A. Vanderhoof and A. N. Langnas, “Short-bowel syndrome in children and adults,” Gastroenterology, vol. 113, no. 5, pp. 1767–1778, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. A. L. Buchman, “Etiology and initial management of short bowel syndrome,” Gastroenterology, vol. 130, no. 2, pp. S5–S15, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. A. S. Day and G. D. Abbott, “D-lactic acidosis in short bowel syndrome,” The New Zealand Medical Journal, vol. 112, no. 1092, pp. 277–278, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  6. L. Stolberg, R. Rolfe, N. Gitlin et al., “D-Lactic acidosis due to abnormal gut flora. Diagnosis and treatment of two cases,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 306, no. 22, pp. 1344–1348, 1982. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. T. Ramakrishnan and P. Stokes, “Beneficial effects of fasting and low carbohydrate diet in D-lactic acidosis associated with short-bowel syndrome,” Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 361–363, 1985. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. M. Hudson, R. Pocknee, and N. A. G. Mowat, “D-Lactic acidosis in short bowel syndrome—an examination of possible mechanisms,” Quarterly Journal of Medicine, vol. 74, no. 274, pp. 157–163, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  9. B. E. Coronado, S. M. Opal, and D. C. Yoburn, “Antibiotic-induced D-lactic acidosis,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 122, no. 11, pp. 839–842, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. S. C. Kadakia, “D-lactic acidosis in a patient with jejunoileal bypass,” Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 154–156, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. C. Scheele, The Collected Papers of Carl Wilhelm Scheele, G. Bell, London, UK, 1931, 1782.
  12. M. R. Wright and F. Jamali, “Methods for the analysis of enantiomers of racemic drugs application to pharmacological and pharmacokinetic studies,” Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. C. Petersen, “D-lactic acidosis,” Nutrition in Clinical Practice, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 634–645, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  14. J. P. Talasniemi, S. Pennanen, H. Savolainen, L. Niskanen, and J. Liesivuori, “Analytical investigation: assay of d-lactate in diabetic plasma and urine,” Clinical Biochemistry, vol. 41, no. 13, pp. 1099–1103, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. de Vrese, B. Koppenhoefer, and C. A. Barth, “D-lactic acid metabolism after an oral load of dl-lactate,” Clinical Nutrition, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 23–28, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  16. D. L. Zhang, Z. W. Jiang, J. Jiang, B. Cao, and J. S. Li, “D-lactic acidosis secondary to short bowel syndrome,” Postgraduate Medical Journal, vol. 79, no. 928, pp. 110–112, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  17. T. Yasuda, S. Ozawa, C. Shiba et al., “D-lactate metabolism in patients with chronic renal failure undergoing CAPD,” Nephron, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 416–422, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. H. Hove and P. B. Mortensen, “Colonic lactate metabolism and D-lactic acidosis,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 320–330, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. A. G. Coran, “The effect of lactated ringer's solution on blood and urine levels of lactate isomers,” The Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 450–453, 1971. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. H. Connor, H. F. Woods, and J. G. G. Ledingham, “Comparison of the kinetics and utilisation of D(−)- and L(+)-sodium lactate in normal man,” Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 481–487, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. S. Oh, J. Uribarri, D. Alveranga, I. Lazar, N. Bazilinski, and H. J. Carroll, “Metabolic utilization and renal handling of D-lactate in men,” Metabolism, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 621–625, 1985. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. de Vrese and C. A. Barth, “Postprandial plasma D-lactate concentrations after yogurt ingestion,” Zeitschrift für Ernährungswissenschaft, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 131–137, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. L. Halperin and K. S. Kamel, “D-lactic acidosis: turning sugar into acids in the gastrointestinal tract,” Kidney International, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. D. Bustos, S. Pons, J. C. Pernas et al., “Fecal lactate and short bowel syndrome,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 2315–2319, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. “The colon, the rumen, and D-lactic acidosis,” The Lancet, vol. 336, no. 8715, pp. 599–600, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  26. S. A. Cross and C. W. Callaway, “D-Lactic acidosis and selected cerebellar ataxias,” Mayo Clinic Proceedings, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 202–205, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. M. I. Caldarini, S. Pons, D. D'Agostino et al., “Abnormal fecal flora in a patient with short bowel syndrome: an in vitro study on effect of pH on D-lactic acid production,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 1649–1652, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. G. P. A. Bongaerts, J. J. M. Tolboom, A. H. J. Naber et al., “Role of bacteria in the pathogenesis of short bowel syndrome-associated D-lactic acidemia,” Microbial Pathogenesis, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 285–293, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. G. Bongaerts, J. Bakkeren, R. Severijnen et al., “Lactobacilli and acidosis in children with short small bowel,” Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 288–293, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. F. Godey, A. Bouasria, M. Ropert, M. Diakite, A. Le Trent, and M. Balençon, “Don't forget to test for D-lactic acid in short bowel syndrome,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 95, no. 12, pp. 3675–3677, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. T. B. Scully, S. C. Kraft, W. C. Carr, and J. M. Harig, “D-lactate-associated encephalopathy after massive small-bowel resection,” Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 448–451, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. J. R. Thurn, G. L. Pierpont, C. W. Ludvigsen, and J. H. Eckfeldt, “D-lactate encephalopathy,” The American Journal of Medicine, vol. 79, no. 6, pp. 717–721, 1985. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. A. Vella and G. Farrugia, “D-lactic acidosis: pathologic consequence of saprophytism,” Mayo Clinic Proceedings, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 451–456, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. R. K. Narula, A. El Shafei, D. Ramaiah, and P. G. Schmitz, “D-lactic acidosis 23 years after jejuno-ileal bypass,” American Journal of Kidney Diseases, vol. 36, no. 2, p. E9, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  35. B. Flourie, B. Messing, E. Bismuth, F. Etanchaud, F. Thuillier, and J. C. Rambaud, “D-lactic acidosis and encephalopathy in short-bowel syndrome occurring during antibiotic treatment,” Gastroentérologie Clinique et Biologique, vol. 14, no. 6-7, pp. 596–598, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  36. J. Uribarri, M. S. Oh, and H. J. Carroll, “D-lactic acidosis: a review of clinical presentation, biochemical features, and pathophysiologic mechanisms,” Medicine, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 73–82, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. N. R. Dahlquist, J. Perrault, C. W. Callaway, and J. D. Jones, “D-lactic acidosis and encephalopathy after jejunoileostomy: response to overfeeding and to fasting in humans,” Mayo Clinic Proceedings, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 141–145, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. K. Spillane, K. Nagendran, P. F. Prior, S. Tabaqchali, and M. Wilks, “Serial electroencephalograms in a patient with D-lactic acidosis,” Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 403–405, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. H. Henry, N. Marmy Conus, P. Steenhout, A. Béguin, and O. Boulat, “Sensitive determination of d-lactic acid and l-lactic acid in urine by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry,” Biomedical Chromatography, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 425–428, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. C. Mayeur, J.-J. Gratadoux, C. Bridonneau et al., “Faecal D/L lactate ratio is a metabolic signature of microbiota imbalance in patients with short bowel syndrome,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 1, Article ID e54335, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. P. G. Jorens, H. E. Demey, P. J. C. Schepens et al., “Unusual D-lactic acid acidosis from propylene glycol metabolism in overdose,” Journal of Toxicology. Clinical Toxicology, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 163–169, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. S. Munakata, C. Arakawa, R. Kohira, Y. Fujita, T. Fuchigami, and H. Mugishima, “A case of D-lactic acid encephalopathy associated with use of probiotics,” Brain & Development, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 691–694, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. L. Boomer, Y. Liu, N. Mahler et al., “Scaffolding for challenging environments: materials selection for tissue engineered intestine,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, vol. 102, no. 11, pp. 3795–3802, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. V. V. Kholostova, A. F. Dronov, A. N. Smirnov et al., “Surgical treatment of Hirschprung's disease total form in children,” Khirurgiia, no. 7, pp. 44–54, 2014 (Russian). View at: Google Scholar
  45. P. M. Singh, A. Borle, and A. Trikha, “Diagnostic dilemma: rare case of recurrent d-lactic acidosis leading to recurrent acute cardiac failure,” Acta Anaesthesiologica Taiwanica, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 94–96, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. C. M. Burski, C. S. Miller, and R. M. Centor, “Formerly obese, now thin and confused: the utility of mnemonics in the approach to altered mental status,” The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, vol. 346, no. 6, pp. 499–502, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. A. Gigante, L. Sardo, M. L. Gasperini et al., “D-lactic acidosis 25 years after bariatric surgery due to Salmonella enteritidis,” Nutrition, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 108–111, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. M. J. T. Guerrero, G. Olveira, M. B. Utrera, N. C. Rodriguez, and J. C. F. Garcia, “D-Lactic acidosis secondary to short bowel syndrome,” Nutrición Hospitalaria, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 864–866, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  49. S. Grunert, M. Schmidts, S. Kenzel et al., “D-lactic acidosis: ‘right-left disorientation’ in laboratory testing: acute encephalopathy in a child with carbohydrate malabsorption syndrome,” Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 106–107, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  50. S. Dahhak, S. Uhlen, K. Mention et al., “D-lactic acidosis in a child with short bowel syndrome,” Archives de Pédiatrie, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 145–148, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. P. Soler Palacín, P. Garzón Lorenzo, Y. Castilla Fernández et al., “D-lactic acidosis in an 11-year-old patient with short bowel syndrome,” Anales de Pediatría, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 385–387, 2006 (Spanish). View at: Google Scholar
  52. M. Puwanant, L. Mo-Suwan, and S. Patrapinyokul, “Recurrent D-lactic acidosis in a child with short bowel syndrome,” Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 195–198, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  53. H. Uchida, H. Yamamoto, Y. Kisaki, J. Fujino, Y. Ishimaru, and H. Ikeda, “D-lactic acidosis in short-bowel syndrome managed with antibiotics and probiotics,” Journal of Pediatric Surgery, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 634–636, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. M. Kamar, A. Raziel, S. Susmallian, S. Kyzer, and I. Charuzi, “D-lactic acidosis in a patient after subtotal colectomy,” Israel Medical Association Journal, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 891–892, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  55. S. S. Azhar and R. E. Beach, “D-lactic acidosis in a diabetic patient with a short bowel,” The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 316–318, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  56. P. Angelet, M. T. Compte, J. L. Cid, T. Soriano, J. Vilaseca, and J. Bartolome, “Recurrent episodes of acidosis with encephalopathy in a hemodialysis program patient with short bowel syndrome,” Nefrologia, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 196–198, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  57. P. H. Lalive, A. Hadengue, N. Mensi, and P. R. Burkhard, “Recurrent encephalopathy after small bowel resection. Implication of D-lactate,” Revue Neurologique, vol. 157, no. 6-7, pp. 679–681, 2001 (French). View at: Google Scholar
  58. B. A. Sela, J. Zlotnik, T. Masos, J. Danieli, S. Mazia-Beni, and A. Jonas, “D-lactic acidosis in short bowel syndrome,” Harefuah, vol. 136, no. 5, pp. 347–420, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  59. S. Koletzko, K. L. Waag, and B. Koletzko, “Recurrent D-lactic acidosis with encephalopathy in a boy with short-bowel syndrome,” Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift, vol. 119, no. 13, pp. 458–462, 1994 (German). View at: Google Scholar
  60. J. Gurevitch, B. Sela, A. Jonas, H. Golan, Y. Yahav, and J. H. Passwell, “D-lactic acidosis: a treatable encephalopathy in pediatric patients,” Acta Paediatrica, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 119–121, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  61. R. J. Forsyth, A. Moulden, and D. Hull, “D-lactate associated encephalopathy in short bowel syndrome: management with long-term non-absorbable oral antimicrobials,” Clinical Nutrition, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 352–355, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. P. Rosenthal and M. Pesce, “Long-term monitoring of D-lactic acidosis in a child,” Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 674–676, 1985. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. E. Haan, G. Brown, A. Bankier et al., “Severe illness caused by the products of bacterial metabolism in a child with a short gut,” European Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 144, no. 1, pp. 63–65, 1985. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. M. Traube, J. L. Bock, and J. L. Boyer, “D-lactic acidosis after jejunoileal bypass: identification of organic anions by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 171–173, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. T. Satoh, K. Narisawa, T. Konno et al., “d-lactic acidosis in two patients with short bowel syndrome: bacteriological analyses of the fecal flora,” European Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 138, no. 4, pp. 324–326, 1982. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. E. P. Schoorel, M. A. H. Giesberts, W. Blom, and H. H. van Gelderen, “D-Lactic acidosis in a boy with short bowel syndrome,” Archives of Disease in Childhood, vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 810–812, 1980. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 N. Gurukripa Kowlgi and Lovely Chhabra. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.