Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Agronomy
Volume 2018, Article ID 1829160, 13 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1829160
Review Article

Plant Sources, Extraction Methods, and Uses of Squalene

1Centro de Desarrollo de Productos Bióticos, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, San Isidro, 62731 Yautepec, MOR, Mexico
2Institute for Drug Research, School of Pharmacy, Hadassah Medical School, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91120, Israel
3Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias, Campo Experimental Valle de México, Coatlinchan, 56250 Texcoco, MEX, Mexico
4Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Delegación Miguel Hidalgo, 11340 Ciudad de México, Mexico

Correspondence should be addressed to Alma Leticia Martínez-Ayala; xm.npi@alayala

Received 2 March 2018; Accepted 28 May 2018; Published 1 August 2018

Academic Editor: José M. Alvarez-Suarez

Copyright © 2018 M. Azalia Lozano-Grande et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Squalene (SQ) is a natural compound, a precursor of various hormones in animals and sterols in plants. It is considered a molecule with pharmacological, cosmetic, and nutritional potential. Scientific research has shown that SQ reduces skin damage by UV radiation, LDL levels, and cholesterol in the blood, prevents the suffering of cardiovascular diseases, and has antitumor and anticancer effects against ovarian, breast, lung, and colon cancer. The inclusion of SQ in the human diet is recommended without causing health risks; however, its intake is low due to the lack of natural sources of SQ and efficient extraction methods which limit its commercialization. Biotechnological advances have developed synthetic techniques to produce SQ; nevertheless, yields achieved are not sufficient for global demand for industrial or food supplement purposes. The effect on the human body is one of the scientific issues still to be addressed; few research studies have been developed with SQ from seed or vegetable sources to use it in the food sector even though squalene was discovered more than half a century ago. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of SQ to establish research focus with special reference to plant sources, extraction methods, and uses.

1. Introduction

Squalene is a linear triterpene synthesized in plants, animals, bacteria, and fungi as a precursor for the synthesis of secondary metabolites such as sterols, hormones, or vitamins. It is a carbon source in the aerobic and anaerobic fermentation of microorganisms [1, 2].

The SQ was discovered by Tsujimoto Mitsumaru in 1916, a Japanese researcher who described the compound as a highly unsaturated molecule, assigning its name to the genus from which was isolated, Squalus spp. [3, 4]. The main source of SQ was the liver of marine animals rich in lipids and unsaponifiable matter (50–80%), whose SQ content may comprise up to 79% of the total oil. SQ is considered important in oily extract for the survival of deep-water animals, where oxygen supply is poor and pressures are very high [5].

The use of marine animal oil as a source of SQ has been limited by animal protection regulations and the presence of organic pollutants (POPs) as organochlorine pesticides, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, dioxins, or heavy metals that cause cancer. This has generated interest in finding new natural sources, especially of plant origin [6].

Among the plant sources reporting SQ content are olive oil (564 mg/100 g), soybean oil (9.9 mg/100 g), rice, wheat germ, grape seed oil (14.1 mg/100 g), peanut (27.4 mg/100 g), corn, and amaranth (5942 mg/100 g). Of these species, olive is only used for extracting commercial squalene despite the highest content reported for amaranth.

SQ is also found in the human body, is secreted by the sebaceous glands for skin protection, and forms part of 10–15% of lipids on the skin surface in concentrations of 300–500 µg/g and on internal organs such as the liver and small intestine in concentrations of less than 75 µg/g [3, 4, 7].

Several studies have confirmed the health benefits of SQ in nutritional, medicinal, and pharmaceutical aspects. It is considered a potent chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic agent, which inhibits the tumor growth in the colon, skin, lung, and breast, and it stimulates the immune system for the application of drugs in the treatment of diseases such as HIV, H1N1, leukemia, papilloma, and herpes, among others [811].

SQ-related research such as pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and food applications are issues that have been addressed independently and do not address commercial expectations. This review provides an overview of the potential natural sources and forms of extraction of this natural lipid.

2. Physicochemical Characteristics of Squalene and Biosynthesis

The SQ (2,6,10,15,19,23-hexamethyl-6,6,10,14,18,20-tetracosahexane) is a hydrocarbon chain formed by six isoprene units (Figure 1); when the units are assembled, they form a triterpene that gives the lipid character. The six carbon double bonds (C=C) allow the molecule to be one of the most unsaturated lipids, and it is sensitive to oxidation [12].

Figure 1: Linear (a) and flat trigonal (b) structure of squalene.

The SQ is physically a transparent oil with the molecular weight of 410.7 g/mol, density of 0.855 g/cm3, melting temperature of −20°C, and it is soluble in organic solvents and insoluble in water [9, 12].

Due to its unsaturated structure, the SQ is sensitive to oxidation; the double bonds pass to the oxidized form by chain reactions, where the unsaturated carbons join ions producing saturated forms of the molecule. Other oxidation products are generated through self-hydrolytic processes such as peroxides, but the SQ is not susceptible to peroxidation; on the contrary, it has an antioxidant protective effect by trapping oxygen singlets during the reaction processes [4, 13].

Studies on oxidation of SQ were scarce; until the last century, the cyclic diperoxides were reported as oxidation products. After 80 years, with advanced techniques (1H·NMR and 13C·NMR), it was found that oxidation mechanisms and chemical structures of epoxy and alcohol are formed after a prolonged oxidation to 55–150°C [1417].

Naziri et al. [17] studied squalene oxidation at different temperatures and air conditions, finding the formation of epoxy with prooxidant activity in the oil at 40°C and 62°C. On the other hand, Psomiadou and Tsimidou [18] reported the antioxidant effect of SQ in olive oil, where the antioxidant activity was weak in presence of other fatty acids, possibly due to a competitive oxidation between the same lipids of the extract. As an endogenous compound, the SQ also contributes to oxidative stability, but this has not been completely studied.

3. Function of Squalene in Plants

Plants biosynthesize a wide variety of metabolites (>230 constituents) in response to stress conditions due to drought, predation, or disease. Among these metabolites, those are the fractions unsaponifiable (<1.5%) that contribute to bioactive properties of oils and imparts stability to the cell membrane of plants [13, 19].

Unsaturated lipids are key components in cell membranes, which together with SQ can regulate biophysical properties, diffusion, and dynamic membrane organization. Models of cell membranes have suggested that SQ acts in the lipid bilayer with other fatty acids as inhibitors of proton leakage in alkaline membranes and influence in the synthesis of ATP [12].

By its nonpolar nature, the SQ is located on the hydrophobic center of the lipid bilayer, organized in a spiral or extended conformation, oriented in parallel to the phospholipid chains between the cell membrane (Figure 2) [20].

Figure 2: Location of minor compounds in the plant cell membrane: oleic acid (A) squalene (B), carotene (C), and tocopherols (D), adapted from López et al. [12].

When the SQ adopts the hexagonal form, it increases the rigidity and the size of the cell membrane. Studies on the lipid-protein interaction in cell membranes have revealed that the SQ increases the polarity and hydrophobic interactions; it is contributing to membrane reconstitution, functional regulation of proteins, and movement of ions. Therefore, the SQ plays an important role in electrochemical cell gradient [13, 21].

Other components such as saponins in interaction with phytosterols and squalene form insoluble complexes, which fix the architecture of the lipid bilayer and generate pores that participate in the permeability of cell membranes [22, 23]. Only 10% of total SQ on the membrane is metabolically active for sterol synthesis, while the rest is stored with triacylglycerides and sterol esters as lipid droplets [21].

The SQ store is used to form important molecules such as β-sitosterol, campesterol, and stigmasterol, which are precursors of hormones for the growth (i.e., brassinosteroids) and plant adaptation to biotic stress [2426]. The sterols are biosynthesized in plant cells via mevalonate or isoprenoids route, where SQ is also metabolized.

3.1. Squalene Biosynthesis

The SQ is an intermediate compound in synthesis of hopanoids, phytosterols, and more than 200 important triterpenes for the cell membrane [2729]. SQ is synthesized from isopentenyl units, isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP) when the intermediate is mevalonate (MVA), and dimethyl-allyl-diphosphate (DMAPP) when the intermediate is methylerytritol phosphate (MEP). The biosynthesis by IPP begins with conversion of three molecules of acetyl-CoA to MVA through the acetoacetyl-CoA until 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) is catalyzed by balsamic-acetyl-CoA synthase (AAS) and HMG-CoA synthase (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Routes of squalene biosynthesis via mevalonate (MVA) and via methylerythritol phosphate (MEP). Acetyl CoA: acetyl coenzyme A; HMG-CoA: hydroxymethyl glutaryl coenzyme A; IPP: isopentenyl diphosphate; SQS: squalene synthase; DXP: desoxicelulose 5-phosphate; DXS: desoxicelulose 5-phosphate synthase; IDI: isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase; IDS: isopentenyl diphosphate synthase; FPS: farnesyl diphosphate synthase; GPP: geranyl diphosphate; HSQS: hydrosqualene.

The reduction of HMG-CoA results in MVA, and this is phosphorylated to MVA-5-diphosphate by the MVA kinase and phospho-MVA-kinase enzymes. The MVA-5-diphosphate in the presence of ATP (adenosine triphosphate) is decarboxylated to form IPP. IPP isomerase (IDI) catalyzes the isomerization of IPP to DMAPP and condensation of two IPP molecules to form GPP (geranyl diphosphate). GPP is condensed with another IPP molecule and creates 15-carbon farnesyl-diphosphate (FPP). Finally, two molecules of farnesyl-diphosphate are reduced via enzymatic reaction to form the SQ which continues its path to the biosynthesis of phytosterols [1, 10, 22, 29].

Phytosterols are the products of cascade cyclization of SQ; these mechanisms are activated from ionic species by deprotonation, hydration (Figure 4), or from oxide-squalene activated by the action of triterpene enzymes such as squalene cyclase (SQs) and oxide-squalene cyclase (OSQ) [17, 30].

Figure 4: Cyclization process of squalene, autohydrolytic (a) or due to involvement ionic species (b).

SQs and OSQ catalyze reactions that convert the pyrophosphate of geranyl, pyrophosphate of farnesyl, and geranyl-geranyl into 57–66 different terpenes [28]. Despite the differences in sites of action of these enzymes (start or end the carbonated chain), all cycling products obtained from SQ are important for functional components of the cell membrane.

There are other forms of squalene production, those produced by prokaryotes organisms (such as E. coli) or in eukaryotes (fungi and yeasts such as Saccharomyces cereviceae, Torulaspora delbrueckii, and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii). These organisms produce SQ via MEP (2-C-methyl-D-erythritol-4-phosphate) by the merger of two FPP [2, 28, 31].

The biosynthesis in these microorganisms begins with 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate (DXP) formation where DXP-synthase and other enzymes participate to reduce MEP to form building block IPP and DMAPP. This block is isomerized via IDI, and the farnesyl-diphosphate-synthase catalyzes the IPP coupling with DMAPP to result in GPP, eventually forming FPP. Recent studies have proposed the synthesis of SQ by three steps with the participation of the enzymes PSPP-synthase, HSQ-synthase (HSQS), and squalene-synthase (SQS). Not in two consecutive steps some authors mention how the SQS catalyzes the fusion of two FPP molecules to pre-SQ diphosphate (PSPP) and then the arrangement of PSPP with NADPH to form the SQ [32].

MEP biosynthesis is used in metabolic engineering as a new strategy for the commercial production of squalene. This includes fermentation with micro-organisms; however, although these techniques are promising, the reported yields (14.5-160.2 mg/L) have not been sufficient to supply commercial production of squalene, and little mention is made of the costs involved [1, 29].

4. Bioactive Properties of Squalene

Various plant terpenes have excellent bioactive properties with applications such as antimicrobials, antibiotics, supplements, flavorings, or repellents. Some terpenes of interest are limonene, carveol, geraniol, stevioside, β-carotene, and lutein. The case of SQ is considered a triterpene with nutritional and medicinal values with broad expectations for pharmaceutical application. Table 1 shows some properties, and their perspectives will be mentioned.

Table 1: List of squalene properties and pharmaceutical applications.
4.1. Weight and Cholesterol Control

The consumption of SQ from natural sources (olive oil, wheat germ, rice husk, or amaranth) can be part of an integral diet. Oral administration of SQ can produce other benefits when ingested in the body. Between 60% and 80% of the exogenous SQ is absorbed and distributed to various tissues, while the endogenous SQ is first synthesized in the liver and then transported to the skin or organs through blood. It has been established that SQ is absorbed faster in the circulatory system than cholesterol, where it is deposited as excess in adipose tissue or muscle tissue [8, 10, 33].

In rat models, oral SQ was absorbed by lymphatic vessels like cholesterol, with only 20% becoming sterols during transit through the small intestine. While in 102 patients, its consumption was also shown to reduce total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels after 20 weeks with SQ-pravastatin treatments [34].

Other in vivo studies have demonstrated the cardioprotective effect of SQ. Farvin et al. [35] tested SQ at a dose of 2% for 45 days and found that it significantly reduced the levels of cholesterol, triglycerides, and fatty acids in plasma and heart tissues. The SQ had an antilipidemic effect on the levels of LDL cholesterol and an increase of HDL cholesterol counteracted lipid peroxidation and maintained the levels in almost normal state of the rats. In another investigation, a dose of 1000 mg/kg reduced leptin levels in blood plasma after 4 weeks, as well as cholesterol, triglycerides, and glucose, and increased testicular weight in rats [36]. The consumption of exogenous SQ has been studied for up to 75 days in high doses without finding differences from the fourth week; however, the effects of excess consumption are still unknown. In this regard, more studies are required for dietary supplement.

4.2. Antioxidant

The six double bonds of SQ in transposition impart reactivity to compound; however, it is very stable to peroxidation and other reactions related to unsaturated compounds. Evidence indicates that the antioxidant activity comes from its capacity to trap oxygen singlets during the autohydrolytic reaction processes and oxidation products (peroxides, SQ-OOH, SQ-OH, and isomers of SQ oxides) [4].

In the skin, it has the capacity to absorb up to a quarter of its weight in oxygen, an important factor that prevents the development of cutaneous flora and peroxidase forms that lead to the development of skin diseases, acne, comedogenics, and wrinkles [15].

In vitro and in vivo studies have determined the by-products of oxidation of SQ and the way of interaction on the physiology of the skin and flora, both under normal conditions and under disorders such as acne. Ozone, UV rays, and cigarette smoke are oxidizing agents of SQ; photoluminescence studies with mass spectrometry (NMR) have elucidated that SQ double bonds react with oxygen on the surface of the skin and prevent photooxidation by the rays [37].

On the contrary, the antioxidant activity of the SQ in terms of its capacity to absorb oxygen radicals (ORACs) in food is less investigated. Tikekar et al. [38] studied the antioxidant activity of SQ in amaranth oil, under different temperature conditions (125°C–150°C for 20 min) and bursting (250°C–290°C). In all conditions, the oxidation of the SQ was low (12.7%) even under extreme conditions of toasting and bursting. On the contrary, pure SQ shows weak antioxidant capacity, compared to the complete amaranth extract; the authors suggest that the antioxidant property of SQ is linked to other components of the oil, such as tocopherols and tocotrienols.

Kohno et al. [39] demonstrated the entrapment velocity of O radicals by SQ, and this was superior compared to other lipids even compared to additive hydroxytoluene (HBT) and food antioxidant frequently used. Similar studies in olive oil have established their antioxidant potential, both by the content of SQ (196 mg/kg) and by interaction with other minor compounds: polyphenols, secoroids, lignans, and vitamin E [40, 41]. Hrncirik and Fritsche [42] and Psomiadou and Tsimidou [18] demonstrated that the antioxidant capacity of SQ oil is not only a function of concentration but also of temperature conditions (<62°C) and interaction with other acids fatty acids, which reduce the oxidation rate due to competitive oxidation [43].

4.3. Emollient and Moisturizer

SQ is a natural antioxidant molecule that protects cells from oxidative damage by exposure to ultraviolet light and other external sources; this molecule participates as a defense mechanism for the internal and external tissues of the skin in the human body.

Kohno et al. [39] found that SQ is not susceptible to peroxidation like other lipids; it is stable against the attack of peroxide radicals which suggests that the chain reaction of lipid peroxidation is spread with adequate levels of SQ on the surface of the skin. However, this protective effect is modified when the SQ undergoes exacerbated oxidations, becoming a source of lipid peroxides. Investigations have suggested a link between comedogenesis and acne where exposure to UV rays, pollution, and cigarette smoke induce higher peroxide formation which impact on sunspots of the skin [44].

Through high-performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) methods, SQ oxides have been described in acne comedons and skin lipids, showing that there is a decrease in pure SQ and an increase in oxidized by-products. This suggests that excessive oxidation of SQ can lead to the production of comedogenic molecules and have no antibacterial properties that prevent the development of the existing flora. Ultimately, they break the comedonal pockets and propagate inflammatory reactions of the dermis that aggravate the effects of acne [4, 45].

In contrast, other studies suggest the SQ relieves skin irritations, through topical applications which prevent photoaging and cancer induced by UV light. Treatments of SQ with oils offer protection to burns, and topical applications of creams added with antioxidants (vitamin E, Co-Q10, and SQ) can increase the bait of the skin and reduce the attack of bacteria and fungi [7, 9, 46].

Thus, it is evident that SQ is not only the main component on the surface of the skin (12%); its importance also lies in the cutaneous physiological function as an antioxidant agent, humectant, and emollient as well as against seborrhea disorders, acne, dermatitis, psoriasis, among other skin diseases.

4.4. Detoxifying

SQ, by its nonpolar nature, has an affinity to nonionized drugs that allows it to function as a purifier of xenobiotic substances in the human body. It has been found that SQ improves the elimination of hexachlorobenzene (HCB, organochlorine xenobiotic) through feces when SQ is supplied in 8% concentrations in the diet. Other xenobiotic substances such as theophylline and strychnine can also be eliminated in feces when the intake of SQ is greater [44].

Other studies in pediatric patients have determined that SQ helps stimulate liver detoxification enzymes, such as the P450 enzyme or for detoxification with lead and other toxic substances. The consumption of SQ in infants also showed greater growth in height and better neuromotor development [47].

Few references [4850] abound on toxicological investigations of SQ for metals and toxic substances; however, SQ has been classified as a detoxifying agent of the ideal human body. This is an area for further investigations.

4.5. Anticancer

Cancer is a system of genetic changes and cell proliferation that occurs in different stages of development. Each stage involves genetic changes caused by chemical agents, UV light, and reactive species that damage DNA, modify genetic expression, and alter the cellular defense system [51].

The consumption of SQ has been shown to have effects on the incidence of cancer; epidemiological models in animals showed that an oral consumption of 1% SQ in the diet influences mammary cells and colon cancer. A hypothesis on the mechanism of inhibition in anticancer activity indicates that SQ reduces the activity of the HMG-CoA reductase enzyme by limiting the steps towards normal cholesterol synthesis and intermediate stages where geranyl diphosphate (GDP) and farnesyl diphosphate (FDP) produce important substrates for the biosynthesis of ubiquinones and for the prenylation (farnesylation) of proteins. Inhibition of these proteins inactivates and reduces signal transduction in the proliferation and differentiation of active cells such as oncogenes and GTP-binding proteins [5153].

An increase in SQ consumption may reduce the development of oncogene-dependent tumors that require prenylation for activation, such as colon, breast, pancreatic, and melanoma tumors. It has been shown that when endogenous SQ is increased, FPP production is reduced and the oncogene is inactivated via prenylation [11].

Similarly, Smith [51] proposed three mechanisms of SQ with a protective effect against carcinogenesis. The first is the inhibition of the activity of HMG-CoA reductase towards cholesterol biosynthesis via the MVA, the second is by mechanisms of regulation of the SQ on the enzymes involved in the metabolism of xenobiotic substances that alter the metabolic activation of carcinogenesis, and the third occurs on the elimination of free radicals and reactive oxygen that produce mutagenic lesions in the DNA, lipids, and proteins that lead to carcinogenesis.

Warleta et al. [54] investigated the properties of SQ on cell proliferation, apoptosis, the level of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and oxidative damage to DNA in human breast cells. They found that SQ did not have significant activity in cell proliferation rates; however, it exerted effects on epithelial cells in a dose-dependent manner of SQ. They observed that SQ reduced levels of intracellular ROS and oxidative damage induced by H2O2.

Other reports have suggested a relationship between the low incidence of cancer with a feeding style based on SQ-rich products, antioxidants, and fiber. Such is the case of Mediterranean diet, where there is a high consumption of SQ and phenolic compounds from the consumption of fish, vegetables, and fruits, which influence a low incidence of diseases of degenerative diseases [40, 55].

Other hypotheses have been established about the possible anticancer effect of SQ; however, there are still few in vitro and in vivo studies that specifically describe the role of SQ in antitumor activity among other mechanisms.

5. Potential Applications of Squalene

5.1. Drug Administration Agent

During the experimental studies carried out to verify the potential effect against cancer and antitumor treatments, it was observed that SQ in combination with other compounds improves the effectiveness of drugs and the immune response to the antigen. In this sense, scientific research was conducted in the search for specific treatments to elucidate the way of acting and specific location for the delivery of drugs in the human body.

The nontoxic chemical nature of lipids is considered excellent carriers for their ability to permeate the cell membrane. The SQ due to its lipidic nature has been efficient in the preparation of emulsions and conjugates for the release of drugs, with a prolonged effect on shelf life. The SQ can be prepared in emulsions, alone or as a secondary ingredient. Water-SQ emulsions with polysorbate 80 have been proposed for influenza vaccines and lecithin-squalene emulsions with tween 80 effective for the induction of antibodies [56].

Wang et al. [57] reported SQ emulsions with phosphatidylethanolamine or Pluronic® F68 that prolong the release of morphine and maintain analgesic activity in animal models in vitro. Other substances such as aluminum hydroxide, aluminum sulfate, and mineral oils have been used in previous decades for the preparation of vaccines, but have been inefficient in the action against the antigen, causing a variety of pathologies such as the formation of granulomas at the site of injection or tumor development [58, 59].

A promising emulsion, known as MF59, has been developed by the company Novartis®, which is formulated on oil in water (o/w) with SQ (4.3% dispersed phase), surfactant Span85, tween 80, and citrate in the continuous phase. This emulsion has been developed as an aid and stimulant of the immune system. Its effectiveness has been proving in several vaccines such as malaria, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, herpes, cytomegalovirus, and even in HIV and the pandemic H1N1 virus [56, 6062].

The mechanisms which SQ contributes to immune response are not yet clear; recent reports indicate that after injection, MF59 increases the immune response causing an influx of phagocytic cells in the vaccination site, allowing a more efficient transport of the antigen to the lymph nodes, and this improves the preactivation of immune response, Figure 5 [61, 62].

Figure 5: Chemical coupling of a conjugate with SQ (squalene-gemcitabine) (a) and immune response mode in human body of squalene vaccine (b), adapted from Seubert et al. [61].

Other advantages of SQ have been found in therapeutic emulsions to carry and supply poorly soluble drugs since they modify the biodistribution and reduce the toxicity, facilitating the targeting of the drug. These lipid conjugate formed by covalent bonds have gained importance in the market such as the case of docosahexaenoic acid conjugated with paclitaxel (Taxoprexin®) or cardiolipin conjugated with gemcitabine, which has been shown to improve the kinetics of the drug and increase the therapeutic index [63, 64].

The process of carrying the drug has been called squalenylation, a technique based on the property of SQ to protect (or coat) the anticancer and antiviral compounds to bring them into the cell and induce their cytotoxic activity [65].

Squalenylation has allowed the formation of nanoassemblies (100–300 nm) when assembled in water without the addition of surfactants. The anticancer effects of squalenylation have been demonstrated superior in in vitro human cancer cells and in vivo of murine cells with leukemia [65]; however, much remains to be investigated in in vivo models.

5.2. Skin Protection

Given the characteristics of SQ as a natural emollient, it is considered an important component in the formulation of cosmetics and moisturizing agents for skin protection. It is a compound of efficient absorption on the surface of the skin, restoring it without leaving oily residues.

It has been reported that SQ is used as a fixing for perfumes and the elaboration of lipsticks because it accelerates the dispersion of the dye and produces greater brightness. When SQ is applied to hair and skin exposed to the sun, it helps restore lost oils and easily forms emulsions with other lipophilic substances which allows not to oxidize quickly [9].

The SQ is a natural constituent of the skin, which has a moisturizing effect that counteracts the appearance of wrinkles and burns through the fixation of water molecules on the surface of the skin. This effect was demonstrated with a synthetic substance such as vernix caseosa (fatty material found in the skin of a newborn) composed of SQ in mixture with other lipids, cholesterol, triglycerides, ceramides, and fatty acids. Its application was successful and recommended as a cream against barrier effect to psoriasis [15].

Other conditions that can be treated with topical SQ applications are seborrheic dermatitis and acne, which controls the amount of unsaturated fatty acids in the skin reducing the condition [9].

The use of SQ in the pharmaceutical and cosmetic industry is broad, although more research is needed related to adverse effects in cutaneous applications.

6. Methods of Extraction of Squalene

The statistics of Global Market Insights for 2016 establish that the world production of SQ exceeded 5,900 tons with a commercial value of USD 111.9 million. By 2022, it is expected its value and production will have a significant increase (9%), attributed to the greater consumption of products with health benefits, cholesterol control medications, food supplements, as well as cosmetics and pharmaceutical products: moisturizing creams, lotions, lipsticks, bronzers, and conditioners for hair, among others.

An innovative product in recent years is the application of SQ as a coadjuvant carrier in vaccines, a patent of the world-renowned laboratory brand, which allows an area of opportunity for further expansion of the market. Europe and Asia are the most attractive markets, and Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Italy, China, and India are the countries with the highest demand for SQ [66].

The global demand for SQ is mainly covered by three sources of extraction: animal, vegetable, and synthetic methods. The SQ extracted from shark liver oil is the most appreciated for its high yield (up to 40% of the weight of the organ); however, the extraction of plant sources is becoming increasingly important, given the protection of marine species in danger of extinction and the release of prohibitive norms on the extraction of SQ from marine species. Even transnational food and cosmetics companies (L’Oreal® and Unilever®) have declared their products are free of SQ from marine animals; this has increased the demand for SQ from other sources.

Biotechnology has developed techniques for the industrial production of SQ, and however, the yields obtained from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Botrycoccus braunii, Aurantiochytrium sp., and E. coli are lower than those from plant sources (5–15 mg/g dry matter, 4.1–340.5 mg/L) and only reach less than 10% of the world [1].

For this reason, they have dedicated themselves to researching potential sources of plant origin, among which are Olea europea, Amaranthus sp., Glycine max, and Zea mays. The concentration of SQ varies depending on the species, harvest season, postharvest conditions, the extraction method, physicochemical treatments to the extract is subjected, and the removal of minor compounds from the oil [3].

In vegetable sources, the yield of squalane varies depending on the extraction method. Table 2 shows that amaranth has the highest content followed by olive, walnut, and other seeds.

Table 2: Content of fatty acids and squalene in different sources naturally extracted with various extraction methods.

Oils are traditionally extracted by mechanical pressure methods or organic solvents, but require refining processes to eliminate undesirable compounds, pigments, free fatty acids, phospholipids, and so on. These processes reduce the yield of SQ to less than 80%; for example, it can decrease from 13 to 7% just by a discoloration process. However, the extraction process by mechanical pressure is still preferred because it produces little modification of the compounds compared with other processes which use physicochemical treatments [3].

The solvent method shows good performance in the extraction of vegetable oils, up to 98%; however, it is difficult to obtain high-purity SQ because of the low concentrations present in the unsaponifiable fraction. Czaplicki et al. [89] reported amaranth SQ concentrations of 5740, 6000, and 6500 mg/100 g of oil, extracted by cold pressure, solvent, and supercritical fluid, respectively. The difference is attributed to the extraction conditions and low sterol content, which are affected when the cell wall is broken during the extraction process.

Other investigations establish supercritical fluid extraction (ScCO2) as a suitable method for oil processing, which facilitates separation of squalene at low temperatures without leaving traces of organic solvents. Generally, ScCO2 is a recommended technique for nonpolar compound extraction with molecular weights less than 500 g/mol soluble in CO2, such as SQ. The extraction time reduces considerably; Krulj et al. [90] found differences between the solvent and ScCO2 method using petroleum ether for the squalene extraction from three amaranth genotypes. The yield obtained was 450 and 350 mg/100 g of oil, respectively. The variability of squalene performance depended on extraction conditions and genotype as well.

He et al. [91] found SQ yields extracted by ScCO2 of 4770 mg/100 g oil based on temperature, pressure, and moisture content of the sample (>10%) as determining factors for extraction efficiency.

Wejnerowska et al. [70] also reported SQ yields in amaranth by ScCO2 extraction, of 1200–9000 mg/100 g oil, the best conditions depending on particle size (0.08–0.5 mm), pressure (20 MPa), temperature (130°C), and time (30 min). They obtained SQ extract with 60% purity while higher purity (>90%) was obtained at longer extraction times (120 min).

The disadvantage of ScCO2 is the high cost of equipment, the complexity of the operating parameters (temperature-pressure), and in some cases, the operating times can be very long. Other techniques such as direct distillation have been tried, although this method is not recommended for SQ because it is a thermolabile compound [3].

Another process to favor SQ extraction is the distillate of deodorization stage during oil refining. Squalene content increases by 15–30% because it produces higher unsaponifiable fraction (sterols) and other components. However, considerable care must be taken with temperature, pressure, and residence time because it influences the quality of the distillate. Soybean and sunflower oil deodorization distillates are by-products most appreciated for the high quality of SQ and tocopherols.

Pramparo et al. [80] reported the best SQ extraction conditions of soybean and sunflower deodorization distillate; they obtained at 140°C the largest amount of distillate and SQ. They observed at higher evaporation temperature greater amount volatile fatty acids were associated to increase in sterols, tocopherols, and SQ.

The composition of unsaponifiable fraction is a factor influencing the squalene yield (0.5–2.0% of the total weight). Olive oil studies have showed that the SQ can represent up to 50% of unsaponifiable fraction, depending on the extraction method and oil refining process. SQ extracted from olive oil yields 5.1–9.6 g of SQ per liter of oil with ∼75% purity, but when SQ is refined, the content reduces significantly [9294].

Table 2 shows the yields of SQ obtained for vegetable species, in which yield recorded for olive and amaranth varied, depending on the extraction methods, the method of quantification, and other factors such as the time of harvest, variety, and even geographical area [67].

Other species, such as rice, wheat, maize, and grapes, contain SQ in a low proportion (<1.0%) therefore not considered potential crops. Amaranth is widely reported with highest SQ content, more than any other plant species, but only two cultivated species are reported where there are more than 75 species worldwide [91].

6.1. Other Methods of SQ Production

Currently, advances in biotechnology have developed alternatives for commercial production of SQ. In 1920, when the biosynthesis of cholesterol was discovered, it was suspected that SQ could be produced via isoprene, and after the 90s with biotechnology tools, SQ was produced via modified genetic material [95].

Laboratories (Amyris Biotechnologies, Arista Industries Inc., and Nucelis LLC.) have developed patents for obtaining SQ, manufacturing terpene from fermentable sugars using common yeast. This technology mimics natural processes to provide β-farnesene (precursor of squalene), removes the yeast, and produces a simple chemical coupling which avoids the need for isolation of lipophilic and oxidatively unstable squalene from the fermentation biomass. Hydrogenation and purification technologies are used in the final stage to get high-purity squalene [96].

Even though the method is reproducible, the manufacturing process must be strictly controlled to ensure quality. Nevertheless, surveys in marketing ensure preference towards natural products, mainly the European market.

6.2. Methods of Quantification

The SQ as raw material for the cosmetics and medicinal industry thus requires quality and purity, which depends on the extraction and analytical methods. The most common methods of analysis include gas chromatography (GC) and high-resolution liquid chromatography (HPLC) [5].

These analyses propose preview processes of separation that include saponification of sample, separation of the unsaponificable fraction, and fractionation by chromatography. These methods usually are laborious, causing modification of SQ during saponification and give false results in the chromatography analysis [97].

Other sample preparation techniques include methylation with KOH in MeOH (2 N) and washed with ethanol : water, in minutes, getting the sample ready to be analyzed by chromatography avoiding interference from minority components (methyl esters of triglycerides). This method results in a real concentration of SQ it has been tested in olive oils, sunflower, soybean, maize, rapeseed, and peanut [97].

Among the tools for separating, identifying, and quantifying components include spectroscopy of masses coupled to gas chromatography (GC-MS), flame ionization (GC-FID), and spectroscopy of masses coupled to liquid chromatography (LC-MS); however, these are not specific for separating SQ [76, 97].

For this purpose, is required a combination of high resolution and sensitivity given by different detectors such as photoionization (UV), infrared (IR), or photodiodes (DAD). However, direct quantification is difficult, so it requires pretreat samples to remove interference [98].

An efficient method was reported by Salvo et al. [77], where squalene concentration was analyzed in olive oil by UPLC/PDA chromatography. The sample was pretreated with hexane, purified on column SPE, and analyzed by UPLC; the method was efficient in the yield.

On the process of extraction and analysis, isomerization potential and squalene oxidation should be considered. Few works have been developed identifying the oxidation products derived from the extraction process. Mountfort et al. [99] reported oxidation products from squalene by LC/APCI-MS locating the epoxy formation and hydroperoxides of SQ.

Among the industrial techniques for calculating SQ is the oil refraction index, which is a quick and economical method, but least precise since it is temperature-sensitive and does not provide information on oil composition. Another recent technology for SQ determination is Raman spectrometry, which is based on density calculation of unusual spectra in band intensity at 1670 cm−1 due to an intensity accumulated by the symmetry of six double bonds of squalene structure. This analytical technique results useful in olive oil, facilitating the study of squalene characteristics even at concentrations less than 1% in lipid material [87].

7. Conclusions

The SQ is an important compound for human health; from its discovery to date, the biosynthesis routes, biological activity, and different extraction methods have been described.

The most important biological effects of squalene stand out as a cancer inhibitor antitumor and antioxidant agent in the skin; that is why its applications in pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries will demand it more in coming decades. However, there is a lack of aspects that require further attention, such as the adverse effect on human consumption, the mechanisms of release, assimilation, and the mode of action against carcinogenesis on the skin.

Nevertheless, the next decade squalene will be a compound of the wide application as an adjuvant in vaccines, which has opened a new unprecedented landscape in the pharmaceutical industry. It is, therefore, necessary to study other potential sources of plants, innovative techniques that guarantee quality and yield but above all the development of commercial-scale crops that guarantee the production of SQ to meet the global demand.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors state there are no conflicts of interest about this publication.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge support of CONACYT with 258081 scholarship granted to M. Azalia Lozano-Grande and Instituto Politécnico Nacional for financial support.

References

  1. G. P. Ghimire, H. T. Nguyen, N. Koirala, and J. K. Sohng, “Advances in biochemistry and microbial production of squalene and its derivatives,” Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 441–451, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Rohmer, M. Seemann, S. Horbach, S. Bringer-Meyer, and H. Sahm, “Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate and pyruvate as precursors of isoprenic units in an alternative non-mevalonate pathway for terpenoid biosynthesis,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 118, no. 11, pp. 2564–2566, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. O. Popa, N. E. Băbeanu, I. Popa, S. Niţă, and C. E. Dinu-Pârvu, “Methods for obtaining and determination of squalene from natural sources,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2015, Article ID 367202, 16 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. M. Pham, B. Boussouira, D. Moyal, and Q. L. Nguyen, “Oxidization of squalene, a human skin lipid: a new and reliable marker of environmental pollution studies,” International Journal of Cosmetic Science, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 357–365, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. Andrieş, I. Popa, N. Elena Băbeanu, S. Niţă, and O. Popa, “Squalene- natural resources and applications,” Farmacia, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 840–862, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  6. G. M. Turchini, W. K. Ng, and D. R. Tocher, Fish Oil Replacement and Alternative Lipid Sources in Aquaculture Feeds, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2011.
  7. V. Kostyuk, A. Potapovich, A. Stancato et al., “Photo-oxidation products of skin surface squalene mediate metabolic and inflammatory responses to solar UV in human keratinocytes,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 8, Article ID e44472, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. F. Esra Güneş, M. Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, B. Diyetetik Bölümü, and İ. Türkiye, “Medical use of squalene as a natural antioxidant derleme/review,” Journal of Marmara University Institute of Health Sciences, vol. 33, no. 44, pp. 220–228, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  9. K. Wołosik, M. Knaś, A. Zalewska, and M. Niczyporuk, “The importance and perspective of plant-based squalene in cosmetology,” Journal of Cosmetic Science, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 19–65, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  10. L. H. Reddy and P. Couvreur, “Squalene: a natural triterpene for use in disease management and therapy,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 61, no. 15, pp. 1412–1426, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. H. L. Newmark, “Squalene, olive oil, and and cancer risk: a review and hypoyhesis,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 1101–1103, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  12. S. Lopez, B. Bermudez, S. Montserrat-de la Paz et al., “Membrane composition and dynamics: a target of bioactive virgin olive oil constituents,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta–Biomembranes, vol. 1838, no. 6, pp. 1638–1656, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. Prades, S. S. Funari, P. V. Escribá, and F. Barceló, “Effects of unsaturated fatty acids and triacylglycerols on phosphatidylethanolamine membrane structure,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 1720–1727, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. L. Xu and N. A. Porter, “Free radical oxidation of cholesterol and its precursors: implications in cholesterol biosynthesis disorders,” Free Radical Research, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 835–849, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Z. R. Huang, Y. K. Lin, and J. Y. Fang, “Biological and pharmacological activities of squalene and related compounds: Potential uses in cosmetic dermatology,” Molecules, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 540–554, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. H. Yin, E. Niki, and K. Uchida, “Special issue on “recent progress in lipid peroxidation based on novel approaches”,” Free Radical Research, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 813–815, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. E. Naziri, R. Consonni, and M. Z. Tsimidou, “Squalene oxidation products: monitoring the formation, characterisation and pro-oxidant activity,” European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, vol. 116, no. 10, pp. 1400–1411, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. E. Psomiadou and M. Tsimidou, “On the role of squalene in olive oil stability,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 4025–4032, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  19. P. V. Escribá, J. M. González-Ros, F. M. Goñi et al., “Membranes: a meeting point for lipids, proteins and therapies: translational medicine,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 829–875, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. T. Hauß, S. Dante, N. A. Dencher, and T. H. Haines, “Squalane is in the midplane of the lipid bilayer: implications for its function as a proton permeability barrier,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta–Bioenergetics, vol. 1556, no. 2-3, pp. 149–154, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. Spanova, D. Zweytick, K. Lohner et al., “Influence of squalene on lipid particle/droplet and membrane organization in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1821, no. 4, pp. 647–653, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. T. Moses, K. K. Papadopoulou, and A. Osbourn, “Metabolic and functional diversity of saponins, biosynthetic intermediates and semi-synthetic derivatives,” Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 439–462, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. M. Augustin, V. Kuzina, S. B. Andersen, and S. Bak, “Molecular activities, biosynthesis and evolution of triterpenoid saponins,” Phytochemistry, vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 435–457, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. H. T. M. Nguyen, A. K. Neelakadan, T. N. Quach et al., “Molecular characterization of Glycine max squalene synthase genes in seed phytosterol biosynthesis,” Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 73, pp. 23–32, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. T. A. Woyengo, V. R. Ramprasath, and P. J. H. Jones, “Anticancer effects of phytosterols,” European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 813–820, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. H. Schaller, “The role of sterols in plant growth and development,” Progress in Lipid Research, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 163–175, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. Spanova and G. Daum, “Squalene–biochemistry, molecular biology, process biotechnology, and applications,” European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, vol. 113, no. 11, pp. 1299–1320, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. R. Xu, G. C. Fazio, and S. P. T. Matsuda, “On the origins of triterpenoid skeletal diversity,” Phytochemistry, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 261–291, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. W. Xu, X. Ma, and Y. Wang, “Production of squalene by microbes: an update,” World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 32, no. 12, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. Y.-S. Chi and S. Kay Obendorf, “Aging of oily soils on textiles. Chemical changes upon oxidation and interaction with textile fibers,” Journal of Surfactants and Detergents, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 371–380, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. M. Rohmer, M. Knani, P. Simonin, B. Sutter, and H. Sahm, “Isoprenoid biosynthesis in bacteria: a novel pathway for the early steps leading to isopentenyl diphosphate.,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 295, pp. 517–524, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. J.-J. Pan, J.-O. Solbiati, G. Ramamoorthy et al., “Biosynthesis of squalene from farnesyl diphosphate in bacteria: three steps catalyzed by three enzymes,” ACS Central Science, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 77–82, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. H. Relas, H. Gylling, and T. Miettinen, “Fate of intravenously administered squalene and plant sterols in human subjects,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 988–994, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  34. P. Chan, B. Tomlinson, C. B. Lee, and Y. S. Lee, “Effectiveness and safety of low-dose pravastatin and squalene, alone and in combination, in elderly patients with hypercholesterolemia,” Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 422–427, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. K. H. S. Farvin, R. Anandan, S. Hari Senthil Kumar et al., “Cardioprotective effect of squalene on lipid profile in isoprenaline-induced myocardial infarction in rats,” Journal of Medicinal Food, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 531–536, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. Y. Liu, X. Xu, D. Bi et al., “Influence of squalene feeding on plasma leptin, testosterone & blood pressure in rats,” Indian Journal of Medical Research, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 150–153, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  37. S. Ekanayake Mudiyanselage, M. Hamburger, P. Elsner, and J. J. Thiele, “Ultraviolet A induces generation of squalene monohydroperoxide isomers in human sebum and skin surface lipids in vitro and in vivo,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 120, no. 6, pp. 915–922, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. R. V. Tikekar, R. D. Ludescher, and M. V. Karwe, “Processing stability of squalene in amaranth and antioxidant potential of amaranth extract,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 56, pp. 10675–10678, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. Y. Kohno, Y. Egawa, S. Itoh, S.-i Nagaoka, M. Takahashi, and K. Mukai, “Kinetic study of quenching reaction of singlet oxygen and scavenging reaction of free radical by squalene in n-butanol,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)/Lipids and Lipid Metabolism, vol. 1256, no. 1, pp. 52–56, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. R. W. Owen, A. Giacosa, W. E. Hullc et al., “Olive-oil consumption and health: the possible role of antioxidants,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 107–112, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. R. W. Owen, W. Mier, A. Giacosa, W. E. Hull, B. Spiegelhalder, and H. Bartsch, “Phenolic compounds and squalene in olive oils: the concentration and antioxidant potential of total phenols, simple phenols, secoiridoids, lignansand squalene,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 647–659, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. K. Hrncirik and S. Fritsche, “Relation between the endogenous antioxidant system and the quality of extra virgin olive oil under accelerated storage conditions,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 2103–2110, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. Ryzard Amarowicz, “Squalene: a natural antioxidant?” European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, vol. 111, no. 5, pp. 411-412, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. G. S. Kelly, “Squalene and its potential clinical uses,” Alternative Medicine Review, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 29–36, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  45. T. Tochio, H. Tanaka, S. Nakata, and H. Ikeno, “Accumulation of lipid peroxide in the content of comedones may be involved in the progression of comedogenesis and inflammatory changes in comedones,” Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 152–158, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. D. Saint-Leger, A. Bague, E. Cohen, and M. Lchivot, “A possible role for squalene in the pathogenesis of acne. I. In vitro study of squalene oxidation,” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 114, no. 5, pp. 535–542, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. A. L. Ronco, E. De Stéfani, and A. Ronco, “Squalene: a multi-task link in the crossroads of cancer and aging,” Functional Foods in Health and Disease, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 462–476, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  48. H. Kamimura, N. Koga, K. Oguri, and H. Yoshimura, “Enhanced elimination of theophylline, phenobarbital and strychnine from the bodies of rats and mice by squalane treatment,” Journal of pharmacobio-dynamics, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 215–221, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. E. Richter, B. Fichtl, and S. G. Schäfer, “Effects of dietary paraffin, squalane and sucrose polyester on residue disposition and elimination of hexachlorobenzene in rats,” Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 335–344, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. I. A. E. Queirolo and M. G. Morales, “Plombemia y squalene,” Tendencias, Actualidad en Pediatría, vol. 10, pp. 131–137, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  51. T. J. Smith, “Squalene: potential chemopreventive agent,” Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1841–1848, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. C. V. Rao, H. L. Newmark, and B. S. Reddy, “Chemopreventive effect of squalene on colon cancer,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 287–290, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. H. L. Newmark, “Squalene, olive oil, and cancer risk: a review and hypothesis,” Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 1101–1103, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  54. F. Warleta, M. Campos, Y. Allouche et al., “Squalene protects against oxidative DNA damage in MCF10A human mammary epithelial cells but not in MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 1092–1100, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. R. W. Owen, R. Haubner, G. Würtele, W. E. Hull, B. Spiegelhalder, and H. Bartsch, “Olives and olive oil in cancer prevention,” European Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 319–326, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. S. K. Kim and F. Karadeniz, “Biological importance and applications of squalene and squalane,” Advances in Food and Nutrition Research, vol. 65, pp. 223–233, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. J. J. Wang, K. C. Sung, C. H. Yeh, and J. Y. Fang, “The delivery and antinociceptive effects of morphine and its ester prodrugs from lipid emulsions,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 353, no. 1-2, pp. 95–104, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. L. Reddy and P. Couvreur, “Novel approaches to deliver gemcitabine to cancers,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 1124–1137, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. L. H. Reddy, C. Dubernet, S. L. Mouelhi, P. E. Marque, D. Desmaele, and P. Couvreur, “A new nanomedicine of gemcitabine displays enhanced anticancer activity in sensitive and resistant leukemia types,” Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 124, no. 1-2, pp. 20–27, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. G. Lippi, G. Targher, and M. Franchini, “Vaccination, squalene and anti-squalene antibodies: facts or fiction?” European Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 70–73, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. A. Seubert, E. Monaci, M. Pizza, D. T. O’Hagan, and A. Wack, “The adjuvants aluminum hydroxide and MF59 induce monocyte and granulocyte chemoattractants and enhance monocyte differentiation toward dendritic cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 180, no. 8, pp. 5402–5412, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  62. D. T. O’Hagan, G. S. Ott, and G. Van Nest, “Recent advances in vaccine adjuvants: the development of MF59 emulsion and polymeric microparticles,” Molecular Medicine Today, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 69–75, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. P. Chen, P.-Y Chien, A. R. Khan et al., “In-vitro and in-vivo anti-cancer activity of a novel gemcitabine-cardiolipin conjugate.,” Anti-Cancer Drugs, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 53–61, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. M. Payne, P. Ellis, D. Dunlop et al., “DHA-paclitaxel (Taxoprexin) as first-line treatment in patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer: report of a phase II open-label multicenter trial.,” Journal of Thoracic Oncology, vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 984–990, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  65. P. Couvreur, B. Stella, L. Harivardhan Reddy et al., “Squalenoyl nanomedicines as potential therapeutics,” Nano Letters, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 2544–2548, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. F. Dent and S. Clarke, “State of the global market for shark products,” FAO Fishereis and Aquaculture Technical Paper, vol. 590, p. 187, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  67. A. Fernandez-Cuesta, L. Leon, L. Velasco, and R. De la Rosa, “Changes in squalene and sterols associated with olive maturation,” Food Research International, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 1885–1889, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. A. Salvo, G. L. La Torre, A. Rotondo et al., “Determination of squalene in organic extra virgin olive oils (EVOOs) by UPLC/PDA using a single-step SPE sample preparation,” Food Analytical Methods, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1377–1385, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. E. Naziri, S. B. Glisic, F. T. Mantzouridou, M. Z. Tsimidou, V. Nedovic, and B. Bugarski, “Advantages of supercritical fluid extraction for recovery of squalene from wine lees,” Journal of Supercritical Fluids, vol. 107, pp. 560–565, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. G. Wejnerowska, P. Heinrich, and J. Gaca, “Separation of squalene and oil from Amaranthus seeds by supercritical carbon dioxide,” Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 110, pp. 39–43, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. E. Naziri, F. Mantzouridou, and M. Z. Tsimidou, “Squalene resources and uses point to the potential of biotechnology,” Lipid Technology, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 270–273, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. H. P. He and H. Corke, “Oil and squalene in Amaranthus grain and leaf,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 51, no. 27, pp. 7913–7920, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. J. Ortega, M. Martínez Zavala, M. Hernández, and J. Díaz Reyes, “Analysis of trans fatty acids production and squalene variation during amaranth oil extraction,” Open Chemistry, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1773–1778, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. M. M. Wall, “Functional lipid characteristics, oxidative stability, and antioxidant activity of macadamia nut (Macadamia integrifolia) cultivars,” Food Chemistry, vol. 121, no. 4, pp. 1103–1108, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. X. Wen, M. Zhu, R. Hu et al., “Characterisation of seed oils from different grape cultivars grown in China,” Journal of Food Science and Technology, vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 3129–3136, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. T. H. J. Beveridge, B. Girard, T. Kopp, and J. C. G. Drover, “Yield and composition of grape seed oils extracted by supercritical carbon dioxide and petroleum ether: varietal effects,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 1799–1804, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. A. Salvo, G. L. La Torre, V. Di Stefano et al., “Fast UPLC/PDA determination of squalene in Sicilian P.D.O. pistachio from Bronte: optimization of oil extraction method and analytical characterization,” Food Chemistry, vol. 221, pp. 1631–1636, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. L. S. Maguire, S. M. O’sullivan, K. Galvin, T. P. O’connor, and N. M. O’brien, “Fatty acid profile, tocopherol, squalene and phytosterol content of walnuts, almonds, peanuts, hazelnuts and the macadamia nut,” International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 171–178, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. Y. Yamamoto and S. Hara, “Novel fractionation method for squalene and phytosterols contained in the deodorization distillate of rice bran oil,” Scientific, Health and Social Aspects of the Food Industry Benjamin Valdez: IntechOpen. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  80. M. Pramparo, S. Prizzon, M. A. Martinello, and M. A. Martinello, “Study of purification of fatty acids, tocopherols and sterols from deodorization distillate.,” Grasas y Aceites, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 228–234, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  81. S. Norhidayah, B. M. Hamed, and I. S. M. Zaidul, “Squalene recovery from palm fatty acid distillate using supercritical fluid extraction,” International Food Research Journal, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1661–1667, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  82. H. L. N. Lau, C. W. Puah, Y. M. Choo, A. N. Ma, and C. H. Chuah, “Simultaneous quantification of free fatty acids, free sterols, squalene, and acylglycerol molecular species in palm oil by high-temperature gas chromatography-flame ionization detection,” Lipids, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 523–528, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  83. S. H. Goh and K. Lumpur, “Minor constituents of palm oil,” Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 237–240, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. S. Gunawan, N. S. Kasim, and Y. H. Ju, “Separation and purification of squalene from soybean oil deodorizer distillate,” Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 128–135, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. Sunarya, M. Hole, and K. D. A. Taylor, “Methods of extraction composition and stability of vitamin A and other components in dogfish (Squalus acanthias) liver oil,” Food Chemistry, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 215–220, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. M. Tsujimoto, “Squalene: a highly unsaturated hydrocarbon in shark liver oil,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 63–72, 1920. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. D. W. Hall, S. N. Marshall, K. C. Gordon, and D. P. Killeen, “Rapid quantitative determination of squalene in shark liver oils by Raman and IR spectroscopy,” Lipids, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 139–147, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. A. Nakazawa, Y. Kokubun, H. Matsuura et al., “TLC screening of thraustochytrid strains for squalene production,” Journal of Applied Phycology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 29–41, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. S. Czaplicki, D. Ogrodowska, R. Zadernowski, and D. Derewiaka, “Characteristics of biologically-active substances of amaranth oil obtained by various techniques,” Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 235–239, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  90. J. Krulj, T. Brlek, L. Pezo et al., “Extraction methods of Amaranthus sp. grain oil isolation,” Journal of the science of food and agriculture, vol. 96, no. 10, pp. 3552–3558, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. H. P. He, Y. Cai, M. Sun, and H. Corke, “Extraction and purification of squalene from Amaranthus grain,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 368–372, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. D. Boskou, Olive Oil : Minor Constitutents and Health, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2008.
  93. C. Nergiz and D. Çelikkale, “The effect of consecutive steps of refining on squalene content of vegetable oils,” Journal of Food Science and Technology, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 382–385, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. M. Murkovic, S. Lechner, A. Pietzka, M. Bratacos, and E. Katzogiannos, “Analysis of minor components in olive oil,” Journal of Biochemical and Biophysical Methods, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 155–160, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. R. Steiner, M. Drescher, M. Bonakdar, and W. Johannisbauer, Method for producing squalene, 2004.
  96. D. Mcphee, A. Pin, L. Kizer, and L. Perelman, “Squalane from sugarcane,” Cosmetics & Toiletries magazine, vol. 129, no. 6, pp. 1–6, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  97. A. Lanzón, A. Guinda, T. Albi, and C. De la Osa, “Método rápido para la determinación de escualeno en aceites vegetales,” Grasas y Aceites, vol. 46, no. 4-5, pp. 276–278, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  98. J. A. Pérez-Serradilla, M. C. Ortiz, L. Sarabia, and M. D. L. De Castro, “Focused microwave-assisted Soxhlet extraction of acorn oil for determination of the fatty acid profile by GC-MS. Comparison with conventional and standard methods,” Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, vol. 388, no. 2, pp. 451–462, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. K. A. Mountfort, H. Bronstein, N. Archer, and S. M. Jickells, “Identification of oxidation products of squalene in solution and in latent fingerprints by ESI-MS and LC/APCI-MS,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 79, no. 7, pp. 2650–2657, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus