International Journal of Breast Cancer

International Journal of Breast Cancer / 2011 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2011 |Article ID 523276 | 8 pages |

Obesity Is an Independent Predictor of Poor Survival in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Retrospective Analysis of a Patient Cohort Whose Treatment Included High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Support

Academic Editor: Filippo Montemurro
Received04 Apr 2011
Accepted05 May 2011
Published06 Jul 2011


The purpose of the study was to identify predictors of long-term survival in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). A cohort of 96 patients, who received high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support (HD-ASCT) as part of their treatment, was analyzed. Percent long-term survival at 10 years was 24.5% (CI 17.2–34.9%) when metastasis was diagnosed and 14.4% (CI 8.7–23.9%) when MBC was diagnosed. Survival was impacted significantly by body mass index (BMI). Median overall survival from initial diagnosis or from time of metastasis for patients with BMIs ≤30 and >30 (obese) was 7.1 (CI 4.4–8.7) and 3.2 years (2.41–6.75), respectively, or 3.2 or 2.3 years (all ). Also, obesity was the only independent patient-related predictor of time to metastasis and of survival. While obesity is linked with poor outcomes in earlier stages of breast cancer, this has not been previously reported for MBC.

1. Introduction

Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in women today after lung cancer. Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is deemed incurable and median survival for patients with cancer that is estrogen receptor (ER) negative or no longer hormonally responsive is only 18 to 24 months [1, 2].

A variety of molecularly targeted drugs have been developed for MBC, but to date only, trastuzumab (Herceptin, Genentech, CA, USA) has shown an overall survival (OS) benefit of several months [35]. Clearly, more effective treatment strategies and/or improved patient selection are urgently needed. In the 1990s, high dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HD-ASCT) was pioneered to improve survival. The initial feasibility studies in small cohorts of patients with advanced stage disease showed improved survival when compared to historical controls [69]. Subsequent prospective randomized clinical trials comparing HD-ASCT to standard chemotherapy resulted in improved PFS, but failed to demonstrate OS benefit [1014]. The results of the last trial of these series with 386 patients with metastatic breast cancer employing HD-ASCT were reported most recently and confirmed the results of earlier studies [15]. All together, the lack of convincing survival data at the expense of high toxicity resulted in the demise of HD-ASCT as a treatment modality of MBC.

However, while the vast majority of patients with MBC will succumb to their disease within a relatively short period of time, 5–10% of patients live longer than 5 years, and observational data suggest that 1–3% of patients treated with conventional chemotherapy and/or hormonal manipulation may experience long-term survival beyond 10–15 years [1621]. Quite surprisingly, the most impressive long-term survival rates in excess of 10% were reported with HD-ASCT [2224]. Response to treatment, site of metastases, hormone receptor status, performance status, and short initial disease-free interval were important prognostic factors for survival after HD-ASCT and corresponded to prognostic factors known from treatment with conventional, less aggressive therapies [2527]. However, the observation periods in all those studies rarely exceeded 5 years.

We have studied long-term survival rates as well as the distinct disease- and patient-related characteristics that would be predictive of long-term survival in a cohort of patients with MBC, who were treated at our institution between 1989 and 1999. Treatments for all patients were not limited to, but included HD-ASCT.

2. Methods

2.1. Patient Population and Data Extracted

Records of all patients in the bone marrow transplant registry at UCSD treated with HD-ASCT for MBC between 1989 and 1999 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were females. Patients were followed for a median of 65 months from diagnosis (range 10.4–255.0 months; quartiles 36.7–109.3 months). No patient was excluded from analysis. Data acquisition and patient confidentiality safeguards were approved by the Institutional Review Board. Age, race, stage at diagnosis, histology, estrogen receptor (ER) and menopausal status, body mass index (BMI) in kg/m2 at the time of HD-ASCT, time to transplant and death, site of metastasis, and disease status prior to HD-ASCT were extracted. Since all transplants were carried out prior to routine assessment of Her-2/neu receptor status, this information was not part of our analysis. A BMI > 30 was defined as obesity ( Menopause was defined clinically by absence of menstruation for more than 12 months (

2.2. Treatments

High dose chemotherapy prior to stem cell support was platinum based in combination with thiotepa/etoposide, ifosfamide/etoposide, cyclophosphamide/BCNU, cyclophosphamide/mitoxantrone, or cyclophosphamide/thiotepa. Dosing was strictly weight-based. Body surface area was allowed to exceed 2 m2. Ten patients received HD-ASCT in first line; all other patients received at least one line of treatment prior to HD-ASCT (median 1; range 0–4). Hormonal treatments for ER+ patients were administered at physicians’ discretion. Autologous stem cell rescue was performed with harvested bone marrow cells in 6 patients. The other 89 patients received peripherally mobilized stem cells, 23 of which received grafts supplemented with harvested bone marrow cells. Mobilization was achieved with granulocyte- or granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor with or without cyclophosphamide.

2.3. Assessment of Disease Status

Extent of metastatic disease was determined within 12 weeks prior to and within 6–12 weeks after HD-ASCT by imaging and physical exam. Thereafter, assessment of disease status was prompted by patient symptoms and carried out at physicians’ discretion. Patients were grouped according to site of metastasis : in visceral or bone metastasis, or local or nodal recurrence. If multiple sites of metastasis were present, assignment to one metastatic site was prioritized as follows: visceral > bone > nodal > local. Complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD) were determined according to RECIST criteria.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Multiple linear regression models were used to explore the association between a continuous outcome and predictors of interest. Residual analysis was performed to check for outliers, normality assumption, and heteroscedasticity. Transformation was done on the outcomes if necessary. Brookmeyer and Crowley’s 95% confidence intervals were used for median survival times [28]. PFS and OS were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. Cox models were used to identify independent predictors of a time-to-event variable and Schoenfeld tests were used to test for proportional hazard assumptions. Predictors of interest with in the univariate analysis were included in an initial model and a manual backward selection was made based on the Wald test values. One subject with an unknown stage value was excluded from the final models. All analyses used the statistical package R version 2.5.1, 2007. (

3. Results

3.1. Patient and Disease Characteristics

Patient-related characteristics are listed in Table 1. Median age at initial diagnosis was 43 years (quartiles 38–49) and 47 years (quartiles 41–43) at metastasis. Median time from initial diagnosis to documentation of metastasis was 29 months (quartiles 16.6–63.7), and from metastasis to HD-ASCT 6.6 months (quartiles 4.5–16.6), respectively. Twelve patients received HD-ASCT as their first line of treatment, whereas 84 patients had at least one prior line of chemotherapy for metastatic disease (48 patients with 1 line, 24 with 2 lines, 10 patients with 3 lines, and 2 patients with 4 lines of chemotherapy). Median BMI at metastasis was 25 (quartiles 21.4–29.6) and 24% of patients were obese (BMI > 30).


 Hispanic 7
 Asian 4
 African-American 4

Age at metastasis
 <age 4019
 ≥age 4077

Menopausal status at diagnosis
 Unknown 2

BMI at metastasis

Stage at diagnosis
 Stage I21
 Stage II43
 Stage III23
 Stage IV 8
 Unknown 1

 Infiltrating ductal79
 Infiltrating lobular10
 Unknown 7

Estrogen receptor status
 Unknown 3

Site of metastasis
 Lymph nodes14

3.2. Survival Rates and Influence of BMI on Survival

For all patients ( ), median PFS and OS were 3.9 years (CI 2.9–5.4) and 5.6 years (CI 4.1–7.4) after initial diagnosis, and 1.6 years (CI 1.3–1.9) and 2.7 years (CI 2.3–3.9) after diagnosis of metastatic disease, respectively (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)). Survival rates at 10 years were 24.5% (CI 17.2–34.9%) from diagnosis and 14.4% (CI 8.7, 23.9%) from when metastatic disease was diagnosed. As depicted in Figure 2, PFS and OS differed significantly for patients with a BMI ≤ 30 and >30. At diagnosis, median PFS for patients with BMIs ≤ 30 ( ) and >30 ( ) was 4.4 (CI 3.6–6.7) and 2.5 years (CI 1.7–4.9), and median OS was 7.1 (CI 4.4–8.7) and 3.2 years (2.41–6.75), respectively (Figure 2(a) and 2(c); all values ; univariate). Once metastasis was diagnosed, median PFS for patients with BMIs ≤ 30 and >30 was 1.8 (CI 1.44–2.77) and 1.04 years (0.9–1.96) years, and median OS was 3.20 (CI 2.42–4.30) and 2.30 years (CI 1.56–4.96), respectively (Figure 2(b) and 2(d); all values  ; univariate).

3.3. Independent Predictors of Time from Initial Diagnosis to Metastasis

Ethnicity, stage at diagnosis, histology, site of metastasis, remission prior to HD-ASCT, menopausal status, ages at HD-ASCT and at diagnosis (< age 40 versus ≥ age 40), BMI (≤ 30 versus > 30), and ER status were evaluated as independent predictors of PFS and OS. In a univariate analysis, BMI, stage at initial diagnosis, and histology were predictive of time from initial diagnosis to metastatic disease (all values  ). As depicted in Table 2, only the initial stage at diagnosis and BMI were confirmed as independent predictors in a multivariate multilinear regression analysis. Time to metastasis was significantly shorter for patients with a BMI > 30 (Table 2). Median time to metastasis was 1.14 years for patients with a BMI > 30 compared to 1.85 years for patients with a BMI ≤ 30 ( for time to metastasis). Times to metastasis were similar for stage I or II disease (approximately 2 years), but time to metastasis shortened significantly compared to stage I or II disease when stage III was present at diagnosis (0.72 years, ).

Years from initial diagnosis to metastasis
Median ( 𝑄 1 , 𝑄 3 )Multiple linear model*
Coefficients (95% CI) 𝑃

𝑛 Intercept : 0.87 (0.48, 1.26 )

 <30731.85 (0.97, 3.26 )Ref
 ≥30231.14 (0.32, 1.97 )−0.44 (−0.85, −0.02 )0.04
Stage at diagnosis
 I212.06 (1.37, 3.26 )Ref
 II432.01 (1.41, 3.29 )0.02 (−0.44, 0.48)0.92
 III230.72 (0.19, 1.94 )−0.93 (−1.46, −0.41)0.0006
 IV ( = metastasis)8N/AN/AN/A

l o g (years from initial diagnosis to metastasis +  0.1) was used as the outcome.
3.4. Independent Predictors of Survival from Metastasis

Stage at diagnosis, ER-status, site of metastasis, remission status prior to HD-ASCT, and BMI were considered for multivariate analysis since univariate values were  . Only BMI, stage at diagnosis and site of metastasis were confirmed to be independent predictors of survival at the time of metastasis (Table 3). Patients with a BMI > 30 had a significantly higher hazard of progression and death compared to patients with a BMI ≤ 30 (HR for progression = 2.23; ; HR for death  1.82; ). Also, once metastasis was diagnosed, hazards of progression and death increased significantly with increasing stages present at diagnosis (compared to stage I all values  ; Table 3) or with visceral disease.

     𝑛 PFSOS
HR (95%CI)HR (95% CI)
HR (95% CI) 𝑃 HR (95% CI) 𝑃

 ≥30232.23 (1.28, 3.88)0.0051.82 (1.03, 3.23)0.04
Stage at diagnosis
 Stage I2111
 Stage II435.09 (2.55, 10.16) < 0 . 0 0 1 2.87 (1.53, 5.4)0.001
 Stage III233.58 (1.61, 7.94)0.0022.61 (1.22, 5.58)0.01
 Stage IV86.88 (2.54, 18.6) < 0 . 0 0 1 3.88 (1.52, 9.9)0.04
Site of metastasis
 Nodal141.37 (0.59, 3.2)0.471.38 (0.6, 3.16)0.45
 Bone281.79 (0.84, 3.82)0.131.60 (0.76, 3.38)0.22
 Visceral374.45 (2.12, 9.37) < 0 . 0 0 1 2.54 (1.25, 5.15)0.01

4. Discussion

In the 1990s, high HD-ASCT was thought to be a beneficial treatment option in MBC, based on the hypothesis that significant dose escalation would improve the efficacy of chemotherapy. When several randomized trials demonstrated that OS was not significantly improved [115]. HD-ASCT was abandoned. Since cure could not be achieved with aggressive treatment, the school of thought changed and sequential single agent chemotherapy with or without biological targeted therapies and /or hormonal manipulation in ER+ patients has become the preferred way of symptom control [2, 29].

However, a proportion of patients with MBC can achieve long-term survival which has been reported to exceed 10% with more aggressive chemotherapy such as HD-ASCT [2224]. We were specifically interested if such high percentages of survival could be maintained beyond 10 years, at which point it is possible that at least some of these patients may be cured of their disease. Second, we studied the patient- and disease-specific characteristics predictive of survival. For both questions we analyzed our institutional cohort of 96 patients with MBC who had received HD-ASCT as part of their treatment algorithm. Since the last patient was transplanted in 1999, each patient had a minimum follow-up of 10 years.

First, we did find long-term survival in excess of 10 years. Survival rates at 10 years were 24.5% from initial diagnosis and 14.4% from when metastatic disease was diagnosed.

Second, and most surprisingly, in univariate and multivariate analyses, obesity was the only patient-related factor associated with significantly shorter OS and PFS from initial diagnosis and from when metastasis was diagnosed. Obesity also predicted shorter time from diagnosis to metastasis. Obesity has previously been reported as a risk factor for survival in patients diagnosed with earlier stages of breast cancer [3032] and seems associated with higher stages at diagnosis [33], but, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study reporting obesity as a risk factor for survival in patients with MBC. Other patient-related factors such as age, ethnicity, and menopausal status were not significant. Weights and obesity status were not available to us at the time of initial diagnosis, but recorded at the time of metastasis prior to first treatment. The median interval between initial diagnosis and time to metastasis was only approximately 3 years and can probably be considered a time frame where major weight changes are not expected to occur for the majority of patients [34]. We therefore felt comfortable to use the weight obtained at metastasis as the representative personal weight for each patient.

Third, among disease-related characteristics, stage at diagnosis was an independent predictor of time to metastasis. Histology and ER-status were not predictive in our cohort. Her-2/ neu was not part of the analysis since it was not routinely tested prior to 1999. At the time of metastasis, in addition to stage at diagnosis, visceral metastasis also became an independent predictor of a higher hazard for progression and, suggestively, shortened OS. Higher stages at diagnosis are known to be associated with shorter time to recurrence and poorer survival [35, 36], and increased likelihood of occult metastasis in permissive niches such as the bone marrow and/or biologically more aggressive forms of cancer with increased burden of disease were suggested as plausible explanations for poorer survival at higher stages [37, 38]. Also, visceral metastasis has been reported before as a predictor of poor survival in MBC [2527]. The association of poorer outcomes with higher stages at initial diagnosis or visceral metastasis seems uniformly accepted, and our study supports these previous findings. The most important and novel finding was the negative effect of obesity on survival in MBC, and its importance as independent predictor of time to metastasis and progression. To the best of our knowledge, these results provide first strong evidence that elevated BMI may contribute significantly to poor survival in MBC and these data were ascertained in the setting of HD-ASCT. While it has been reported that obesity is associated with higher stages of breast cancer at diagnosis [33], and that obesity negatively impacts various outcome factors in earlier stages of breast cancer [3032], the effects of obesity have not been directly studied in MBC. Specifically in respect to locoregional breast cancer, two prospective studies identified obesity as an independent risk factor for overall mortality, distant and contralateral recurrence, and death from breast cancer [31, 32]. Similar findings for all presentations of breast cancer (some of which had MBC) were reported in the Prospective Analysis of Case-control studies on Environmental factors and Health (PACE) study [30].

In general, it is increasingly recognized that obesity and cancer are linked and that obesity not only confers a higher risk of cancer incidence but also increases cancer mortality as demonstrated in three large population-based cohort studies [3941]. The reasons are poorly understood, but tumor growth stimulation by adipokines released from fatty tissue, inflammation [4244], and especially in the case of breast cancer increased estrogen levels in obese postmenopausal females fueling tumor growth [45, 46] are implicated. Also, adjuvant undertreatment of obese patients, if chemotherapy is not strictly weight-based [4749], is increasingly recognized as important for early relapse. Against physicians’ beliefs, chemotherapy in the obese is well tolerated, and, while dose increases proportional to weight do not confer a higher risk for toxicity [49, 50], under-dosing in the obese breast cancer patient receiving adjuvant chemotherapy demonstrated increased risk for recurrence, shorter DFS or OS [51, 52]. Despite these data, two recent surveys show that only 25% of breast cancer patients receive strictly weight-based dosing during adjuvant chemotherapy and that 19 of 44 cooperative group trials used dose limits for the obese [47, 48]. In our study population, doses of previous adjuvant regimens were unknown, and suboptimal adjuvant treatment cannot be ruled out as a reason for faster time to metastasis in the obese. However, agents used for treatment in the metastatic setting and for HD-ASCT were dosed by actual body weight, and body surface areas were allowed to exceed 2 m2, such that underdosing does not appear to be the main reason for poorer outcome parameters. Further study limitations are absence of Her-2-neu as important prognostic marker, since it was not routinely available in the era of HD-ASCT, and patient population diversity. Selection bias may be present since not every patient deemed a candidate for HD-ASCT may have been referred or proceeded to HD-ASCT. Factors such as, but not limited to, physicians’ or patients’ treatment preferences, patients’ performance status and socioeconomic status may have interfered.

Until now, obesity and its effect on outcomes in MBC have not been examined in depth, and this is the first report to implicate obesity in poorer outcomes. While this observation was made in the setting of HD-ASCT, conclusions about the contribution of HD-ASCT to long-term survivorship cannot be made, given retrospective study design, diverse study patient population, and mixed treatment algorithms. However, our results demonstrate that ultra-long-term survivorship can be achieved in the setting of more aggressive chemotherapy with HD-ASCT and that obesity was deleterious in MBC. In contrast to MBC, correction of unhealthy life-style behavior associated with obesity is the subject of intense exploration after adjuvant treatment for breast cancer, where patients are officially recognized as “breast cancer survivors.” Results from the Women’s Healthy Eating and Living (WHEL) study [53] suggest that obese patients can experience significant overall survival benefit if compliant with a combination of diet and exercise. We believe that our findings generate the hypothesis that obesity may be a potentially correctable patient-related adverse survival factor in MBC and, similar to approaches for locoregional stages of breast cancer, can serve as a target for intervention given the prospect of long-term survival in certain settings.


  1. P. Tai, E. Yu, V. Vinh-Hung, G. Cserni, and G. Vlastos, “Survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer: twenty-year data from two SEER registries,” BMC Cancer, vol. 4, article 60, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. N. Wilcken and R. Dear, “Chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer: a summary of all randomised trials reported 2000–2007,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 44, no. 15, pp. 2218–2225, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. C. E. Geyer, J. Forster, D. Lindquist et al., “Lapatinib plus capecitabine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 355, no. 26, pp. 2733–2743, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. K. Miller, M. Wang, J. Gralow et al., “Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone for metastatic breast cancer,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 357, no. 26, pp. 2666–2676, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. D. J. Slamon, B. Leyland-Jones, S. Shak et al., “Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against her2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 344, no. 11, pp. 783–792, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. R. Abraham, T. Nagy, P. E. Goss, and M. Crump, “High dose chemotherapy and autologous blood stem cell support in women with breast carcinoma and isolated supraclavicular lymph node metastases,” Cancer, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 790–795, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. K. Antman, L. Ayash, A. Elias et al., “High-dose cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin with autologous marrow support in women with measurable advanced breast cancer responding to standard-dose therapy: analysis by age,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs, no. 16, pp. 91–94, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  8. L. J. Ayash, A. Elias, C. Wheeler et al., “Double dose-intensive chemotherapy with autologous marrow and peripheral- blood progenitor-cell support for metastatic breast cancer: a feasibility study,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 37–44, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  9. C. Gisselbrecht, J. M. Extra, J. P. Lotz et al., “Cyclophosphamide/mitoxantrone/melphalan (CMA) regimen prior to autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) in metastatic breast cancer,” Bone Marrow Transplantation, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 857–863, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  10. N. Kröger, M. Frick, O. Gluz et al., “Randomized trial of single compared with tandem high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with chemotherapy-sensitive metastatic breast cancer,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 24, no. 24, pp. 3919–3926, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. -P. Lotz, H. Curé, M. Janvier et al., “High-dose chemotherapy with haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for metastatic breast cancer patients: final results of the French multicentric randomised CMA/PEGASE 04 protocol,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 71–80, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. P. Schmid, W. Schippinger, T. Nitsch, G. Huebner, R. Kreienberg, and W. Schultze, “Up-front tandem high-dose chemotherapy (HD) compared to standard chemotherapy with doxorubicin and paclitaxel (AT) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC): final results of a randomized trial,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 22, p. 37S, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  13. J. J. Vredenburgh, B. Madan, D. Coniglio et al., “A randomized phase III comparative trial of immediate consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell support compared to observation with delayed consolidation in women with metastatic breast cancer and only bone metastases following intensive induction chemotherapy,” Bone Marrow Transplantation, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 1009–1015, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J. J. Vredenburgh, D. Coniglio, G. Broadwater et al., “Consolidation with high-dose combination alkylating agents with bone marrow transplantation significantly improves disease-free survival in hormone-insensitive metastatic breast cancer in complete remission compared with intensive standard-dose chemotherapy alone,” Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 195–203, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. Crump, S. Gluck, D. Tu et al., “Randomized trial of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral-blood stem-cell support compared with standard-dose chemotherapy in women with metastatic breast cancer: NCIC MA.16,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 37–43, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. E. A. Diaz-Canton, V. Valero, Z. Rahman et al., “Clinical course of breast cancer patients with metastases confined to the lungs treated with chemotherapy,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 413–418, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. O. Er, D. K. Frye, S. -W.C. Kau et al., “Clinical course of breast cancer patients with metastases limited to the liver treated with chemotherapy,” Cancer Journal, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 62–68, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. P. A. C. Greenberg, G. N. Hortobagyi, T. L. Smith, L. D. Ziegler, D. K. Frye, and A. U. Buzdar, “Long-term follow-up of patients with complete remission following combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 2197–2205, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  19. U. Güth, D. J. Huang, S. Dirnhofer, C. Rochlitz, and E. Wight, “Distant metastatic breast cancer as an incurable disease: a tenet with a need for revision,” Cancer Journal, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 81–86, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  20. G. N. Hortobagyi, “Can we cure limited metastatic breast cancer?” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 620–623, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  21. Jr. Sledge G.W., “Should we dream the impossible dream? The meaning of long-term survival in metastatic breast cancer,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 2191–2193, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  22. K. H. Antman, P. A. Rowlings, W. P. Vaughan et al., “High-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem-cell support for breast cancer in North America,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 1870–1879, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  23. A. D. Elias, J. Ibrahim, P. Richardson et al., “The impact of induction duration and the number of high-dose cycles on the long-term survival of women with metastatic breast cancer treated with high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue: an analysis of sequential phase I/II trials from the Dana-Farber/Beth Israel STAMP program,” Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 198–205, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  24. W. P. Peters, R. D. Dansey, J. L. Klein, and R. D. Baynes, “High-dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation in the treatment of breast cancer,” Oncologist, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  25. D. A. Rizzieri, J. J. Vredenburgh, R. Jones et al., “Prognostic and predictive factors for patients with metastatic breast cancer undergoing aggressive induction therapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell support,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 3064–3074, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  26. P. A. Rowlings, S. F. Williams, K. H. Antman et al., “Factors correlated with progression-free survival after high-dose chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for metastatic breast cancer,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 282, no. 14, pp. 1335–1343, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. A. Schneeweiss, M. Hensel, P. Sinn et al., “Characteristics associated with long-term progression-free survival following high-dose chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer and influence of chemotherapy dose,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 679–688, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. R. Brookmeyer and J. Crowley, “A confidence-interval for the median survival-time,” Biometrics, vol. 38, pp. 29–41, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  29. S. E. Jones, “Metastatic breast cancer: the treatment challenge,” Clinical Breast Cancer, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 224–233, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. L. Dal Maso, A. Zucchetto, R. Talamini et al., “Effect of obesity and other lifestyle factors on mortality in women with breast cancer,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 123, no. 9, pp. 2188–2194, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. J. J. Dignam, K. Wieand, K. A. Johnson, B. Fisher, L. Xu, and E. P. Mamounas, “Obesity, tamoxifen use, and outcomes in women with estrogen receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 95, no. 19, pp. 1467–1476, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  32. S. Loi, R. L. Milne, M. L. Friedlander et al., “Obesity and outcomes in premenopausal and postmenopausal breast cancer,” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 1686–1691, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. A. Macciò, C. Madeddu, G. Gramignano et al., “Correlation of body mass index and leptin with tumor size and stage of disease in hormone-dependent postmenopausal breast cancer: preliminary results and therapeutic implications,” Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 88, pp. 677–686, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. J. M. Jakicic, B. H. Marcus, K. I. Gallagher, M. Napolitano, and W. Lang, “Effect of exercise duration and intensity on weight loss in overweight, sedentary women: a randomized trial,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 290, no. 10, pp. 1323–1330, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. A. Jemal, R. Siegel, E. Ward et al., “Cancer statistics, 2008,” CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 71–96, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. W. A. Woodward, E. A. Strom, S. L. Tucker et al., “Changes in the 2003 American joint committee on cancer staging for breast cancer dramatically affect stage-specific survival,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 21, no. 17, pp. 3244–3248, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. S. Braun, K. Pantel, P. Müller et al., “Cytokeratin-positive cells in the bone marrow and survival of patients with stage I, II, or III breast cancer,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 342, no. 8, pp. 525–533, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. S. A. Rabbani and A. P. Mazar, “Evaluating distant metastases in breast cancer: from biology to outcomes,” Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, vol. 26, no. 3-4, pp. 663–674, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. E. E. Calle, C. Rodriguez, K. Walker-Thurmond, and M. J. Thun, “Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. Adults,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 348, no. 17, pp. 1625–1638, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. G. K. Reeves, K. Pirie, V. Beral, J. Green, E. Spencer, and D. Bull, “Cancer incidence and mortality in relation to body mass index in the Million Women Study: cohort study,” British Medical Journal, vol. 335, no. 7630, pp. 1134–1139, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. Y. -M. Song, J. Sung, and M. Ha, “Obesity and risk of cancer in postmenopausal Korean Women,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 26, no. 20, pp. 3395–3402, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. D. R. Cottam, S. G. Mattar, E. Barinas-Mitchell et al., “The chronic inflammatory hypothesis for the morbidity associated with morbid obesity: implications and effect of weight loss,” Obesity Surgery, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 589–600, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. E. Fiorio, A. Mercanti, M. Terrasi et al., “Leptin/HER2 crosstalk in breast cancer: in vitro study and preliminary in vivo analysis,” BMC Cancer, vol. 8, article 305, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. D. Sisci and E. Surmacz, “Crosstalk between IGF signaling and steroid hormone receptors in breast cancer,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 705–717, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. S. E. Hankinson, W. C. Willett, J. E. Manson et al., “Alcohol, height, and adiposity in relation to estrogen and prolactin levels in postmenopausal women,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 87, no. 17, pp. 1297–1302, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  46. S. Rinaldi, T. J. Key, P. H. M. Peeters et al., “Anthropometric measures, endogenous sex steroids and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women: a study within the EPIC cohort,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 118, no. 11, pp. 2832–2839, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. C. G. Greenman, C. H. Jagielski, and J. J. Griggs, “Breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy dosing in obese patients: dissemination of information from clinical trials to clinical practice,” Cancer, vol. 112, no. 10, pp. 2159–2165, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. J. J. Griggs, E. Culakova, M. E. S. Sorbero et al., “Effect of patient socioeconomic status and body mass index on the quality of breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 277–284, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. P. Poikonen, C. Blomqvist, and H. Joensuu, “Effect of obesity on the leukocyte nadir in women treated with adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil dosed according to body surface area,” Acta Oncologica, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 67–71, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. P. Jenkins, S. Elyan, and S. Freeman, “Obesity is not associated with increased myelosuppression in patients receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 544–548, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. M. Colleoni, S. Li, R. D. Gelber et al., “Relation between chemotherapy dose, oestrogen receptor expression, and body-mass index,” Lancet, vol. 366, no. 9491, pp. 1108–1110, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. G. L. Rosner, J. B. Hargis, D. R. Hollis et al., “Relationship between toxicity and obesity in women receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B study 8541,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 3000–3008, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  53. J. P. Pierce, L. Natarajan, B. J. Cann, B. A. Parker, E. R. Greenberg, and S. W. Flatt, “The influence of a very high vegetable-fruit-fiber, low-fat diet on prognosis following treatment for breast cancer: results from the Women's Healthy Eating and Living (WHEL) randomized trial,” Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 106, p. S16, 2007. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2011 A. von Drygalski et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

1333 Views | 579 Downloads | 14 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.