Research Article  Open Access
Despeckle Filtering for Multiscale AmplitudeModulation FrequencyModulation (AMFM) Texture Analysis of Ultrasound Images of the IntimaMedia Complex
Abstract
The intimamedia thickness (IMT) of the common carotid artery (CCA) is widely used as an early indicator of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Typically, the IMT grows with age and this is used as a sign of increased risk of CVD. Beyond thickness, there is also clinical interest in identifying how the composition and texture of the intimamedia complex (IMC) changed and how these textural changes grow into atherosclerotic plaques that can cause stroke. Clearly though texture analysis of ultrasound images can be greatly affected by speckle noise, our goal here is to develop effective despeckle noise methods that can recover image texture associated with increased rates of atherosclerosis disease. In this study, we perform a comparative evaluation of several despeckle filtering methods, on 100 ultrasound images of the CCA, based on the extracted multiscale AmplitudeModulation FrequencyModulation (AMFM) texture features and visual image quality assessment by two clinical experts. Texture features were extracted from the automatically segmented IMC for three different age groups. The despeckle filters hybrid median and the homogeneous mask area filter showed the best performance by improving the class separation between the three age groups and also yielded significantly improved image quality.
1. Introduction
The World Health Organization ranks cardiovascular disease (CVD: coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, and peripheral artery disease) as the third leading cause of death and adult disability in the industrial world [1]. In the United Sates alone, more than 76 million American adults have one or more types of CVD, of whom about half are estimated to be age 65 or older. It is estimated that by 2015, there will be 20 million deaths due to atherosclerosis that will be associated with coronary heart disease and stroke. Atherosclerosis causes enlargement of the arteries and thickening of the artery walls. It begins early in life and silently progresses until clinical events appear.
The intimamedia thickness (IMT) is used as a validated measure for the assessment of atherosclerosis [2, 3] (see Figure 1). We present in Figure 1 anatomical locations of the common carotid artery (CCA) ultrasound image for atherosclerosis indicating the location of the intimamedia complex (IMC) at the far wall. The extracted IMC is shown in Figure 1 and has been extracted using an automated snake segmentation algorithm as described in [4]. In [4], we showed that automated IMT, medialayer thickness (MLT), and intimalayer thickness (ILT) measurements could be carried out successfully. It was furthermore proposed that the IMT, its thickness [2, 4], and its textural characteristics [4, 5] may be associated with the risk of developing stroke.
(a)
(b)
Speckle, a form of locally correlated multiplicative noise, corrupts medical ultrasound imaging making visual observation difficult [6, 7]. Clearly though, excessive despeckling may result in the loss of image structure. Unfortunately, image structure is hard to assess, and this is especially difficult for noisy ultrasound images.
We are interested in characterizing image structure using a multiscale AmplitudeModulation FrequencyModulation (AMFM) texture analysis system as described in [8], and by the independent visual assessment of clinical experts who are asked to judge the quality of the despeckled images. Multiscale AMFM models represent nonstationary image content using spatiallyvarying amplitude and phase components. We use the term instantaneous amplitude (IA) to describe spatiallyvarying amplitude components. Similarly, we use the term of instantaneous frequency (IF) to describe spatiallyvarying frequency content. AMFM components are estimated using a multiscale filterbank that is tuned to different frequency bands. Thus, we use the term multiscale AMFM analysis to summarize the analysis. The promise of AMFM methods for texture analysis can be summarized in (see [9]) as follows: (i) they provide physically meaningful texture features (e.g., instantaneous frequency in cycles per mm), over multiple scales, at pixel level resolution, (ii) textures can be reconstructed from AMFM components so that we can visualize content, (iii) we can extract AMFM decompositions for different frequency coverage, and (iv) we have the recent development of robust methods for AMFM demodulation (see examples in [9–11]).
Early work in AMFM image representations has been reported in [12, 13]. In [12], Havlicek et al. discussed the use of multicomponent AMFM models where Kalman filters are used to track changes in the instantaneous amplitude and instantaneous frequency components. In [13], Havlicek et al. introduced a complexextension of the Hilbert transform for images and suggested the use of quasieigenfunction approximations (QEAs) for estimating the instantaneous frequency from discrete signals. An early application of AMFM methods in medical imaging appeared in [14] in electron microscopy. In [15], the authors introduced a foveated video quality assessment method based on the use of continuousspace AMFM transforms. In [16], the authors extended this research to video compression based on local instantaneous frequency content and the characteristics of the human visual system. An effective model for texture analysis based on multidimensional frequency modulation was introduced in [10]. The multiscale AMFM methods that are used in this paper were first introduced in [9] and first applied in medical image analysis in [17].
For onedimensional signals, the empirical mode decomposition pioneered in [18] has been applied to several applications. The empirical mode decomposition uses a special case of AMFM functions, intrinsic mode functions as basis functions for decomposing signals. These intrinsic mode functions decompose fractional Gaussian noise using a dyadic filter bank as documented in [19]. The popular implementation of the empirical mode decomposition based on [20] requires that the instantaneous amplitude for the first mode be estimated using the extrema of the input signal and then using interpolation to determine the envelope. This approach is clearly sensitive to noise since the envelope estimation is very sensitive to additive noise artefacts. We are not aware of any robust extensions that avoid the significant noise artefacts or robust 2D extensions required for the current application. On the other hand, the use of multiscale AMFM decomposition allows us to deal with noise through the use of suitable designed bandpass filters [9]. For the current application, the effectiveness of this approach is demonstrated in [8].
While AMFM decompositions can effectively model nonstationary texture, it is also clear that we want to avoid measuring noise. We want to investigate the use of despeckle filtering for reducing the levels of noise in the image. Yet, excessive despeckling can destroy the nonstationary signal content. It can result in a reduction of the discriminatory power of the texture analysis system introduced in [8, 9, 11], and we expect this to also be detected by the clinical experts as a reduction in image quality. Ultimately, we are interested in the application of despeckle filtering methods that can lead to improvements in computerized texture analysis methods as well as significant improvements in the image quality judged by clinical experts. The use of AMFM features to characterize the CCA will also provide complimentary information to classical texture analysis features like the grayscale median, contrast, and coarseness. AMFM texture features can be associated with the progression of cardiovascular risk for disease and the risk of stroke with age.
Prior research on the use of despeckle filtering on CCA plaque images was reported by Loizou et al. in [21, 22]. In this paper, we investigate the use of two additional despeckle filtering methods, namely, the despeckle filter Kuhawara (see Section 2.3.1, ) and the hybrid median filtering method (see Section 2.3.2) and study their effects on image quality and multiscale AMFM texture analysis on the thin structures of the intima media. As we described in this paper, the new filters gave significantly better results than prior research in [21, 22].
Formally, an input image, is expressed as a sum of AMFM components using [9, 11] as follows: where denotes the th instantaneous amplitude (IA) function, denotes the th instantaneous phase (IP) component, and indexes the different AMFM components. For each AMFM component , we define the instantaneous frequency (IF) by and the magnitude of the IF given by . Textural characteristics are described in terms of the IA and the IF extracted from different frequency scales. Here, frequency scales are defined based on the IF magnitude and are further classified into low, medium, and highfrequency scales.
In [8], AMFM analysis on the IMC, medialayer (ML), and intimalayer (IL) structures, showed that there are significant differences in AMFM texture features extracted from different age groups and different sexes. In this paper, we investigate the AMFM texture features that can show significant differences and also appear to be improving in simulations involving the use of despeckle filtering on groundtruth signals.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In the next sections, materials and methods, experimental results, discussion, concluding remarks, and future work are given.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Ultrasound Images Acquisition
A total of 100 Bmode longitudinal ultrasound images of the CCA were recorded using the ATL HDI3000 ultrasound scanner (Advanced Technology Laboratories, Seattle, USA) [23] as described in [8]. The images were recorded at the Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics in Nicosia, Cyprus. The recordings were carried out in agreement with the Cyprus national bioethics committee rules on clinical trials, and after patient’s written consent. For the recordings, we used a linear probe (L74) with a recording frequency of 4–7 MHz [23], a velocity of 1550 m/s, and a1 cycle per pulse, which resulted in a wavelength (spatial pulse length) of 0.22 mm and an axial resolution of 0.11 mm. Furthermore, the scanner is equipped with 64 elements fine pitch highresolution, 38 mm broadband array, an acoustic aperture of 10 × 8 mm, and a transmission focal range of 0.8–11 cm.
The Bmode scan settings were adjusted to allow for the maximum dynamic range with a linear postprocessing curve. In order to ensure that a linear postprocessing curve is used, these settings were preselected (by selecting the appropriate startup presets from the software) and were included in the part of the startup settings of the ultrasound scanner. The position of the probe was adjusted so that the ultrasonic beam was vertical to the artery wall. The time gain compensation (TGC) curve was adjusted, (gently sloping), to produce uniform intensity of echoes on the screen, but it was vertical in the lumen of the artery where attenuation in blood was minimal, so that echogenicity of the far wall was the same as that of the near wall. The overall gain was set so that the appearance of the carotid wall was assessed to be optimal, and slight noise appeared within the lumen. It was then decreased so that at least some areas in the lumen appeared to be free of noise (black). Thus, the standardization effort follows the ACSRS acquisition guidelines as detailed in [24].
Images were acquired with the subject’s head rotated by 45° away from the study side. A single longitudinal image was captured at the distal end of the CCA during the diastolic phase of a cardiac cycle. All captured images were revealing optimal visualization of the IMC of the far wall and the near wall of the CCA at the same time, thus corresponding to a midline horizontal longitudinal representation of the CCA walls.
During image acquisition, the sonographers varied spatial resolution to provide optimal imaging at different depths [4, 5]. However, without standardizing image resolution, the estimated AMFM components would not be comparable. To see this, note that continuousspace image frequencies are expressed in cycles per millimeter, and unless we have a common spatial resolution, the estimated digital frequencies would correspond to different continuousspace (analogue) frequencies. As a result, we then had to use bicubic spline interpolation to resize all digital images to a standard pixel density of 16.66 pixels/mm. The use of bicubic spline interpolation does not add additional information to the image. In other words, interpolation does not recover highfrequency content that was not present in the original acquisition. Thus, when comparing among images, it is important to note that highfrequency content is comparable to the extent that it is shared among all of the resolutions. Also, note that most of the images were acquired at the target resolution. In other words, we only made small corrections to spatial resolution.
The images were also intensity normalized, as described in [25], where a manual selection of blood and adventitia performed by the user of the system is required. The grayscale intensity normalized image was obtained through algebraic (linear) scaling of the image by linearly adjusting the image so that the median gray level value of the blood was 0–5 and the median gray level of the adventitia (artery wall) was 180–190 [25, 26]. The images were recorded from 42 female and 58 male asymptomatic patients. These subjects had not developed any clinical symptoms, such as a stroke or a transient ischemic attack. The primarycare physicians informed the subjects of our strokeprevention research study. Overall, patients’ ages varied between 26 and 95 years, with a mean age of 54 years. The images were partitioned into three different age groups. In the first group, we included 27 images from patients, who were younger than 50 years old. In the second group, we had 36 patients, who were 50–60 years old. In the third group, we included 37 patients who were older than 60 years.
2.2. Simulated Images
To understand the effects of despeckle filtering on AMFM estimation, we perform a simulation on a synthetic image (see Figure 2(a)) which was created to resemble clinical ultrasound images. The synthetic IA image was 1024 × 1024 pixels with two strips. For the simulation, we set the IA and the IF as follows:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
The resulting synthetic image is shown in Figure 2(b). We add multiplicative noise (see Figure 2(c)) to generate , where and represent the noisy and the original images, respectively, and is a uniformly distributed random noise with zero mean and noise variance . We show the results after applying a low frequency AMFM estimation in Figures 2(d)–2(h). Figure 2(d) illustrates the instantaneous amplitude (IA) estimation from the noisy image, while Figures 2(e)2(f) show the IF estimation for the  and directions. In Figure 2(f), we show the IA estimation from the denoised image after using the hybrid median despeckle filter. Finally, we show the IF estimation using this method in Figures 2(g)2(h).
2.3. Despeckle Filtering
2.3.1. Linear Filtering
First Order Statistics Filtering (DsFlsmv, DsFwiener). These filters utilize the first order statistics such as the variance and the mean of a pixel neighbourhood and may be described with a multiplicative noise model [21, 22, 27]. Hence the algorithms in this class may be traced back to the following equation: where is the estimated noisefree pixel value, is the noisy pixel value in the moving window, is the local mean value of a 5 × 5 rectangular region surrounding and including pixel , is a weighting factor, with , and are the pixel coordinates. The factor is a function of the local statistics in a moving window and can be found in the literature [21, 22] as The values and represent the variance in the moving window and the variance of noise in the whole image, respectively. The noise variance is calculated in the logarithmically compressed image, using the average noise variance over a number of windows with dimensions considerably larger than the filtering window [21, 22]. The Wiener filter uses a pixelwise adaptive method [6, 7, 22, 28] and is implemented as given in (3) with a different weighting factor [13]. For both despeckle filters, which are proposed in this subsection, the moving window size was 5 × 5 and the number of iterations was set to two.
Homogeneous Mask Area Filtering (DsFkuhawara, DsFlsminsc). The Kuhawara despeckle filter is a 1D filter operating in a 5 × 5 pixel neighbourhood by searching for the most homogenous neighbourhood area around each pixel [22, 29]. The middle pixel of the 1 × 5 neighbourhood is then substituted with the median gray level of the 1 × 5 mask. The filter was iteratively applied 2 times on the image.
The DsFlsminsc is a 2D filter operating in a 5 × 5 pixel neighbourhood by searching for the most homogenous neighbourhood area around each pixel, using a 3 × 3 subset window [21, 22]. The middle pixel of the 5 × 5 neighbourhood is substituted with the average gray level of the 3 × 3 mask with the smallest speckle index, , where for logcompressed images is given by where and represent the variance and mean of the 3 × 3 window. The window with the smallest is the most homogenous semiwindow, which, presumably, does not contain any edge. The filter is applied iteratively one time in the image.
2.3.2. Nonlinear Filtering (DsFmedian, DsFhybridmedian)
The first filter proposed in this subsection [22] is a median filter applied over windows of size 5 × 5. This is extended in the hybrid median despeckle filter, [30] which produces the average of the outputs generated by median filtering with three different windows (cross shape window, shape window, and normal window).
2.3.3. Diffusion Filtering (DsFsrad, DsFnldif)
Speckle Reducing Anisotropic Diffusion Filtering. Speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion is described in [7]. It is based on setting the conduction coefficient in the diffusion equation using the local image gradient and the image Laplacian. The speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion filter [7] uses two seemingly different methods, namely, the Lee [27] and the Frost diffusion filters [28]. A more general updated function for the output image by extending the PDE versions of the despeckle filter is [7, 22] The diffusion coefficient for the speckle anisotropic diffusion, , is derived [7] as
It is required that . The above instantaneous coefficient of variation combines a normalized gradient magnitude operator and a normalized Laplacian operator to act like an edge detector for speckle images. Highrelative gradient magnitude and lowrelative Laplacian indicate an edge. The filter proposed in this subsection utilizes speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion after (5) with the diffusion coefficient in (7) [7].
Coherent Nonlinear Anisotropic Diffusion Filtering. This filter extends the conduction coefficient using a symmetric positive semidefinite diffusion tensor [31] with the parameters as given in [22]. Therefore, the filter will take the following form: where is a symmetric positive semidefinite diffusion tensor representing the required diffusion in both gradient and contour directions, and hence enhancing coherent structures as well as edges. The design of as well as the derivation of the coherent nonlinear anisotropic diffusion model may be found in [31] and is given as with where the eigenvectors , and the eigenvalues , correspond to the directions of maximum and minimum variations and the strength of these variations, respectively. The flow at each point is affected by the local coherence, which is measured by in (10). The parameters used in this work for the coherent nonlinear anisotropic diffusion filter were and , which were used for the calculation of the diffusion tensor , and the parameter step size , which defined the number of diffusion steps performed. The local coherence is close to zero in very noisy regions and diffusion becomes isotropic (), whereas in regions with lower speckle noise, the local coherence corresponds to [31].
2.4. IMC Snakes Segmentation
All images were automatically segmented to identify the IMC regions. Automatic segmentation was carried out after image normalization and despeckle filtering using the snakes segmentation system proposed and evaluated on ultrasound images of the CCA in [4]. The segmentation system is based on the Greedy active contour algorithm [32]. Using the definitions given in Figure 1, we first segment the IMC [33] by extracting the I5 (lumenintima interface) and the I7 boundaries (mediaadventitia interface). In order to achieve standardization in extracting the thickness from the IMC segments with similar dimensions, the following procedure was carried out. A region of interest of 9.6 mm (160 pixels) in length was first extracted. This was done by estimating the center of the IMC area and then selecting 4.8 mm (80 pixels) left and 4.8 mm (80 pixels) right of the center of the segmented IMC. Selection of the same IMC length from each image is important in order to be able to extract comparable measurements between images and subject groups.
We note that there was no significant difference between the manual and automated segmentation measurements for the IMC [4].
2.5. Texture Analysis Using Multiscale AmplitudeModulation FrequencyModulation (AMFM) Methods
Multiscale AMFM texture features were extracted over different channel filters. We refer to [8] for full details on the approach. Here, we provide a brief summary for completeness.
First, a complex valued image is obtained using an extended 2D Hilbert operator. The operator is implemented by taking the 2D FFT of the input image, zeroing out the upper two frequency quadrants, multiplying the remaining frequency components by 2, and taking the inverse 2D FFT.
The complexvalued output image is processed through a collection of 2D channel filters with passbands restricted over the (nonzeroed) lower two quadrants. We refer to [8] for a clear description of the filterbank. Here, we simply note that we have low, medium, and highfrequency scales based on the passband frequency magnitudes. Based on the dyadic frequency decomposition, we have lowfrequency components from 1.04 to 2.95 cycles/mm that correspond to instantaneous wavelengths (IWs) from 5.66 to 16 pixels (0.34–0.96 mm); mediumfrequency components from 2.08 to 5.89 cycles/mm that correspond to IW from 2.83 to 8 pixels (0.17–0.48 mm); and highfrequency components from 4.17 to 11.79 cycles/mm that correspond to IW from 1.41 to 4 pixels (0.085–0.24 mm) [8].
AMFM demodulation is carried out separately for the low, medium, and highfrequency scales. Adaptively, for each frequencyscale, at each image pixel, we estimate IA by taking the absolute value of the channel response. Then, at each pixel, among the channel responses of each scale, we select the channel that gives the maximum IA. The phase for each scale is then estimated by taking the phase response of the dominant channel.
An adaptive method is used for estimating IF components. The IF components are estimated using and similarly for , where denotes the estimated FM image . In (12), we consider for the low frequencies, for the medium frequencies, and for the high frequencies. Among the IF estimates, we select the one that generates the minimum argument to the function. This is expected to be the most accurate [11]. The AMFM texture features are then formed by taking the 32bin histograms of the resulting IA and IF estimates from each one of the three frequency scales.
The MannWhitney rank sum test (for independent samples of different sizes) [34] was used in order to identify if there were significant differences (S) or not (NS) between the extracted AMFM texture features at . The results will be explained in Section 3.2 and summarized in Table 3.
2.6. Visual Evaluation by Experts
The visual evaluation was carried out according to the ITUR recommendations with the Double Stimulus Continuous Quality Scale (DSCQS) procedure [21, 22]. The 100 segmented IMC structures of the CCA were evaluated visually by two vascular experts, a cardiovascular surgeon, and a neurovascular specialist before and after despeckle filtering. For each case, the original and the despeckled images were presented at random and without labeling to the two experts. The experts were asked to assign a score in the one to five scale corresponding to low and high subjective visual perception criteria. Five was given to an image with the best visual quality. Therefore, the maximum score for a filter is 500, if the expert assigned the score of five for all the 100 images. For each filter, the score was divided by five to be expressed in percentage format. The experts were allowed to give equal scores to more than one image in each case. For each class and for each filter the average score was computed.
We have, furthermore, used the recently proposed NIQE index assessment tool [35] for objective evaluation of the quality of the images. The tool is based on the construction of a quality aware collection of statistical features based on a simple and successful space domain natural scene statistic model. These features are derived from a collection of natural, undistorted images. The quality of the despeckled image is expressed as a simple distance metric between the model statistics and those of the original image. A software release of the NIQE index is available at http://live.ece.utexas.edu/research/Quality/index.htm.
3. Experimental Results
3.1. Artificial Carotid Image
Despeckle filtering was evaluated on an artificial carotid artery image corrupted by speckle noise (see Figure 2(a)) as described in the materials and methods section. Figure 2 presents the results using a low frequency scale for the AMFM methods. In Figure 2(a), we present the original synthetic image, while in Figures 2(b) and 2(c), we show the original synthetic image with low frequency information and the image from Figure 2(b) with speckle noise, respectively. In Figure 2(d) we show the IA estimation from the noisy image, while in Figure 2(e), we present the IFx estimation from the noisy synthetic image. In Figure 2(f), the IFy estimation from the noisy synthetic image is illustrated while in Figure 2(g), the IA estimation from the despeckled image using the hybrid median filter is shown. Finally in Figures 2(h) and 2(i), we present the IFx estimation from the despeckled artificial image using the hybrid median filter and the IFy estimation from the despeckled image using the hybrid median filter, respectively. Below each figure we present the zoom of the top part of the synthetic image AMFM results including the top strip for visualization purposes.
Table 1 presents the results of despeckle filtering demonstrating its advantages applied to a synthetic AMFM example. We note significant noise estimation improvements for the narrow strip for both the IF component for both the  and direction. Here, we were not interested in the IA error since it was piecewiseconstant and estimation could be significantly improved by simply using medianfiltering on the estimated values. The results are reported over the lowfrequency scales where most of the image energy is usually concentrated.

3.2. Real Carotid Ultrasound Images
We show in Figure 3 an example of the original IMC ultrasound image in the first column and the corresponding despeckled images with hybrid median, and Kuhawara filters in the second and third columns, respectively. The figure also shows the logarithmic views of the IA components LIA, MIA, and HIA; the IF components LIF, MIF, HIF; and the reconstructed FM component. The last row shows the FM demodulation (integral of the IF) of the images in the low frequencies. For better visualization, the images have been interpolated to be 300 × 20 pixels. In this Figure, image regions where the estimated instantaneous frequency is outside the lowscale frequency range are depicted as dark (black). By comparing the figures (in the three different columns of Figure 3), it is clear that the hybrid median approach has improved the estimation significantly. In other words, there are fewer dark regions in the results of the second column than there are in the third column of Figure 3 (see Log LIA column). For the Kuhawara filter (see Figure 3, third column), segmentation gave a slightly expanded version of the original segmentation results. Furthermore, the area of the dark regions appears to be greater than that for the hybrid median filter. Also, in this case, the Kuhawara filter does not show significant improvements over the results on the original image.
The first part of Table 2 tabulates the results of the visual evaluation of the original and despeckled IMC images made by two experts, a cardiovascular surgeon and a neurovascular specialist. It is clearly shown in Table 1 that the best despeckle filter is the hybrid median with a score of 73%, followed by Kuhawara with a score of 71%. It is interesting to note that these two filters were scored with the highest evaluation markings by both experts. The other filters gave poorer performance, like the DsFnldif, DsFlsminsc, and DsFsrad, that gave an evaluation score of 62%, 58%, and 56%, respectively. The third row of Table 2 presents the overall average percentage (%) score assigned by both experts for each filter. The second part of Table 2 illustrates the objective evaluation performed, for all despeckled filters investigated, between the original and the despeckled images by using the NIQE index. It is shown that the best results were obtained by the hybrid median despeckle filter (NIQE = 0.987) followed by the Kuwahara (NIQE = 0.981) despeckle filter. The last row of Table 2 presents the final filter ranking.
 
NIQE: Naturalness image quality evaluation. 
 
LIA, MIA, HIA: Low, Medium, High instantaneous amplitude. LIF, MIF, HIF: Low, medium, high instantaneous frequency, Score: Illustrates the numbers of significantly different features. 
Table 3 presents the statistical analysis between the Low, Medium, and High AMFM features extracted from the IMC for the three different age groups, below 50 (<50), between 50 and 60 (50–60), and above 60 (>60) years old based on the MannWhitney rank sum test, showing only the features that exhibited statistically significant difference at . It is shown in Table 3 that all the despeckle filters investigated increased the number of AMFM features that exhibited significant differences between the different ages (compare the first row for the Original images versus the rest of the columns that represent the despeckled images). More specifically, using the hybrid median filter, we can use the following AMFM components that demonstrated significant differences for differentiating between the different IMC age groups.(a)For the <50 and 50–60 years old, use the LIA component.(b)For the <50 and >60 years old, use the MIA, and/or the LIF, and the HIF components.(c)For the 50–60 and >60 years old, use the LIA, and/or the LIF, and the MIF components.Also, the Kuhawara despeckle filter that can be used showed a similar performance as above, except for the LIF component in (c).
Table 4 presents a comparison of the mean, standard deviation (STD), median, 5%, 10%, 25%, 75%, 90%, and 95% quartiles between the high, medium, and low AMFM features extracted from the IMC for the original and the despeckled filters DsFhybrimedian and DsFkuhawara for the three different age groups, below 50 (<50), between 50 and 60 (50–60), and above 60 (>60) years old. Only those features that showed significant differences in almost all different age groups according to Table 3 are presented. The results indicate that for the high instantaneous frequency (HIF) magnitude median for the IMC, the 75th percentile value of the >60 age group remains lower than the median value of the <50 age group (cycles/mm). Furthermore, we note the original HIF standard deviation of 0.028 (<50) and 0.016 (>60) cycles/mm versus the hybrid median filter with 0.1776 (<50) and 0.126 (>60) cycles/mm and the Kuhawara filter with 0.178 (<50) and 0.125 (>60) cycles/mm. It is clear that image despeckling produces more than a 5fold increase in the spread of the high instantaneous frequency range. This suggests that highfrequency texture information does benefit from despeckling.
 
IMC: Intimamediacomplex. 
This is a positive result since speckle noise can have detrimental effects on high frequencies. Another significant difference is observed in the standard deviation for the Low Instantaneous Frequency (LIF). In this case, it is interesting to compare the LIF for 50–60 that gives 0.038 cycles/mm for the despeckled images versus 0.058 cycles/mm for the hybrid median filter. This shows a significant increase in the lowfrequency magnitude spread in the results for the hybrid median filter. As discussed in Figure 2, successful AMFM estimation over larger regions of the image also contribute to this larger spread. On the other hand, note a somewhat smaller spread for the >60 group (0.052 versus 0.047 cycles/mm). Overall, it is clear that the IF spreads for the despeckled images tend to either have a significant increase or remain essentially the same as the original (speckled) images.
4. Discussion and Concluding Remarks
Clinically, no significant changes are anticipated in the IMT before the age of 50 [36]. It was shown in [4] (based on a similar group of subjects with the one used in this study as well) that between the ages of 50 and 60, the age borderline for the young (<50 years) and the adult (>60 years) ages and a subtle increase in IMT can be demonstrated and IMC textural changes can be initially observed. Above the age of 60, IMT increases and changes in the IMC are more evident. Moreover, most of the stroke incidences in this age group are associated with the carotid atherosclerosis disease. Significant texture changes between the different age groups were reported in [5] for age and sex. More specifically: (a) some of the texture features can be associated with the increase (difference variance, entropy) or decrease (grey scale median (GSM)) of patient’s age, (b) the GSM of the media layer (ML) falls linearly with increasing ML thickness (MLT) and with increasing age, (c) the GSM of male subjects is larger than that of female subjects (see Figure 4), and (d) male and female subjects may be better distinguished using texture features extracted from the IMC.
Despeckle filtering improved the class separation between the three age groups as measured by the number of significantly different AMFM texture features. The improvements were also reflected in better instantaneous frequency estimation and also the significantly improved image quality as evaluated by two clinical experts. In terms of performance, the nonlinear hybrid median despeckle filter (DsFhybridmedian) gave the best results, followed by the homogeneous mask area filter (DsFkuhawara). More specifically, using the hybrid median filter, we can use the following AMFM components that demonstrated significant differences for differentiating between the different IMC age groups: (a) for the <50 and 50–60 years old use the LIA component; (b) for the <50 and >60 years old use the MIA, and/or the LIF, and the HIF components; (c) for the 50–60 and >60 years old use the LIA, and/or the LIF, and the MIF components. Also, the Kuhawara filter that can be used showed a similar performance as above, except for the LIF component in (c).
These filters combined with multiscale AMFM analysis can be used to differentiate between the three age groups investigated (that could loosely correspond to low, medium, and highrisk). It should be noted that this is not the case when the nondespeckled AMFM analysis was used as documented in [8] (and shown in Table 3). In fact, almost all despeckling filters improved class separation over the nondespeckled filters. In Table 3, this is reflected in the increased number of significant (despeckled) AMFM features that can be used to differentiate between classes.
The intensity normalization method used in this study was found to be helpful in the manual contour extraction [22, 26] as well as the snakes segmentation of the IMC [4, 33] and the extraction and evaluation of texture features from ultrasound images of the CCA [5]. The method uses prior knowledge of the high and lowintensity values of the adventitia and blood so that the new intensity histogram of the lesion has its maximum peak close to its average grayscale value [25]. Moreover, this method increased the classification accuracy of different plaque types as assessed by the experts [37]. Ultrasound image normalization was carried out prior to segmentation of the IMT on carotid artery ultrasound images for increasing the image contrast in [38]. Using the above intensity normalisation method, the AMFM texture analysis proposed in this study may be also applied directly to the logarithmic compressed images.
The proposed despeckle filtering methods have been evaluated on 550 ultrasound images of the CCA together with other despeckle filters in [21, 22, 26] using texture features, image quality metrics, observers evaluation, and kNN classification. More specifically, it was shown that these filters can be used to improve the class separation between asymptomatic and symptomatic subjects based on the statistics of the extracted texture features and improve the classification success rate and the visual evaluation by experts. A number of other despeckle filtering methods have been proposed by other researches in the last 20 years, for increasing the accuracy of edge detection in images [39], improve the image visual perception evaluation [7, 21, 22, 27–31], and aid the segmentation of the IMC and atherosclerotic carotid plaque in ultrasound images [4, 33] or videos of the CCA [40]. Recently, a despeckle filtering toolbox for ultrasound videos have been proposed [41], which can also be downloaded in executable code from http://www.medinfo.cs.ucy.ac.cy/.
Future work will investigate whether it is possible to identify a group of patients at risk of atherosclerosis based on their texture features extracted from the IL, ML, and the IMC of highresolution ultrasound images of the CCA. It may also be possible to identify and differentiate those individuals into high and low risk groups according to their cardiovascular risk before the development of plaques. The proposed methodology may also be applied to a group of people, which already developed plaques in order to study the contribution of the ML texture features to cardiovascular risk. Both groups of patients may benefit by prognosing and managing future cardiovascular events. Another possible future application of the proposed methodology is that it can be used to investigate possible effects of statins or other drugs in texture feature changes of the ML of the CCA.
The results will need to be validated on larger datasets before they can be transitioned to clinical use. Furthermore, the effect of despeckling on automated segmentation, texture analysis, and classification of atherosclerotic plaques needs to be further researched.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
References
 American Heart Association, Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics, Update, Dallas, Tex, USA, 2011.
 P. Pignoli, E. Tremoli, and A. Poli, “Intimal plus medial thickness of the arterial wall: a direct measurement with ultrasound imaging,” Circulation, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 1399–1406, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
 L. E. Chambless, A. R. Folsom, L. X. Clegg et al., “Carotid wall thickness is predictive of incident clinical stroke: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 151, no. 5, pp. 478–487, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
 C. P. Loizou, C. S. Pattichis, A. N. Nicolaides, and M. Pantziaris, “Manual and automated media and intima thickness measurements of the common carotid artery,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 983–994, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. P. Loizou, M. Pantziaris, M. S. Pattichis, E. Kyriacou, and C. S. Pattichis, “Ultrasound image texture analysis of the intima and media layers of the common carotid artery and its correlation with age and gender,” Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 317–324, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. F. Wagner, S. W. Smith, J. M. Sandrik, and H. Lopez, “Statistics of speckle in ultrasound Bscans,” IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 156–163, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
 Y. Yu and S. T. Acton, “Speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 1260–1270, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. P. Loizou, V. Murray, M. S. Pattichis, M. Pantziaris, and C. S. Pattichis, “Multiscale amplitudemodulation frequencymodulation (AMFM) texture analysis of ultrasound images of the intima and media layers of the carotid artery,” IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 178–188, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. S. Pattichis, “Multidimensional AMFM models and methods for biomedical image computing,” in Proceedings of the 34th IEEE Annual International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 5641–5644, September 2009. View at: Google Scholar
 M. S. Pattichis and A. C. Bovik, “Analyzing image structure by multidimensional frequency modulation,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 753–766, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 V. Murray, P. Rodríguez, and M. S. Pattichis, “Multiscale AMFM demodulation and image reconstruction methods with improved accuracy,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 1138–1152, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. P. Havlicek, D. S. Harding, and A. C. Bovik, “The multicomponent AMFM image representation,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1094–1100, 1996. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. P. Havlicek, D. S. Harding, and A. C. Bovik, “Multidimensional quasieigenfunction approximations and multicomponent AMFM models,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 227–242, 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. S. Pattichis, C. S. Pattichis, M. Avraam, A. Bovik, and K. Kyriacou, “AMFM texture segmentation in electron microscopic muscle imaging,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 1253–1258, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Lee, M. S. Pattichis, and A. C. Bovik, “Foveated video quality assessment,” IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 129–132, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Lee, M. S. Pattichis, and A. C. Bovik, “Foveated video compression with optimal rate control,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 977–992, 2001. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Agurto, V. Murray, E. Barriga et al., “Multiscale AMFM methods for diabetic retinopathy lesion detection,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 502–512, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 N. E. Huang, Z. Shen, S. R. Long et al., “The empirical mode decomposition and the Hubert spectrum for nonlinear and nonstationary time series analysis,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 454, no. 1971, pp. 903–995, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
 P. Flandrin, G. Rilling, and P. Gonçalvés, “Empirical mode decomposition as a filter bank,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 112–114, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Rilling, P. Flandrin, and P. Goncalves, “On empirical mode decomposition and its algorithms,” in Proceedings of the IEEEEURASIP Workshop on Nonlinear Signal and Image Processing (NSIP '03), vol. 3, pp. 8–11, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
 C. P. Loizou, C. S. Pattichis, C. I. Christodoulou, R. S. H. Istepanian, M. Pantziaris, and A. Nicolaides, “Comparative evaluation of despeckle filtering in ultrasound imaging of the carotid artery,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 1653–1669, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. P. Loizou CS Pattichis, Despeckle Filtering Algorithms and Software for Ultrasound Imaging, Synthesis Lectures on Algorithms and Software for Engineering, Morgan & Claypool, San Rafael, Calif, USA, 2008.
 A Philips Medical System Company, “Comparison of image clarity, SonoCT realtime compound imaging versus conventional 2D ultrasound imaging,” Tech. Rep., ATL Ultrasound, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
 A. Nicolaides, M. Sabetai, S. K. Kakkos et al., “The Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis and Risk of Stroke (ACSRS) study. Aims and result of quality control,” International Angiology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 263–272, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
 T. Elatrozy, A. Nicolaides, T. Tegos, A. Z. Zarka, M. Griffin, and M. Sabetai, “The effect of Bmode ultrasonic image standardisation on the echodensity of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid bifurcation plaques,” International Angiology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 179–186, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
 C. P. Loizou, C. S. Pattichis, M. Pantziaris, T. Tyllis, and A. Nicolaides, “Quality evaluation of ultrasound imaging in the carotid artery based on normalization and speckle reduction filtering,” Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 414–426, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. S. Lee, “Digital image enhancement and noise filtering by using local statistics,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 165–168, 1980. View at: Google Scholar
 V. S. Frost, J. A. Stiles, K. S. Shanmugan, and J. C. Holtzman, “A model for radar images and its application for adaptive digital filtering of multiplicative noise,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 157–166, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
 M. Kuwahara, K. Hachimura, S. Eiho, and M. Kinoshita, Digital Processing of Biomedical Images, Edited by K. Preston and M. Onoe, Plenum Publishing Corporation, 1976.
 A. Nieminen, P. Heinonen, and Y. Neuvo, “A new class of detailpreserving filters for image processing,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 74–90, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
 K. Z. AbdElmoniem, A.B. M. Youssef, and Y. M. Kadah, “Realtime speckle reduction and coherence enhancement in ultrasound imaging via nonlinear anisotropic diffusion,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 997–1014, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. J. Williams and M. Shah, “A Fast algorithm for active contours and curvature estimation,” CVGIP: Image Understanding, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 14–26, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
 C. P. Loizou, C. S. Pattichis, M. Pantziaris, T. Tyllis, and A. Nicolaides, “Snakes based segmentation of the common carotid artery intima media,” Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 35–49, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. J. Conover, Practical Nonparametric Statistics, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 1999.
 A. Mittal, R. Soundararajan, and A. C. Bovik, “Making a completely blind image quality analyser,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 209–212, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
 A. SchmidtTrucksäss, D. Grathwohl, A. Schmid et al., “Structural, functional, and hemodynamic changes of the common carotid artery with age in male subjects,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1091–1097, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
 A. N. Nicolaides, S. K. Kakkos, M. Griffin et al., “Effect of image normalization on carotid plaque classification and the risk of ipsilateral hemispheric ischemic events: results from the Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis and Risk of Stroke study,” Vascular, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 211–221, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Mojsilović, M. Popović, N. Amodaj, R. Basić, and M. Ostojić, “Automatic segmentation of intravascular ultrasound images: a texturebased approach,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1059–1071, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
 A. C. Bovik, “On detecting edges in speckle imagery,” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 1618–1627, 1988. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. P. Loizou, S. Petroudi, C. S. Pattichis, M. Pantziaris, and A. N. Nicolaides, “An integrated system for the segmentation of atherosclerotic carotid plaque in ultrasound video,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 86–101, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
 C. P. Loizou, C. Theofanous, M. Pantziaris et al., “Despeckle filtering toolbox for medical ultrasound video,” International Journal of Monitoring and Surveillance Technologies Research, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 61–79, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 C. P. Loizou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.