Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Biomedical Imaging
Volume 2014, Article ID 704791, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/704791
Research Article

Comparison and Supervised Learning of Segmentation Methods Dedicated to Specular Microscope Images of Corneal Endothelium

LGF UMR CNRS 5307, École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Etienne, 158 Cours Fauriel, 42023 Saint-Etienne Cedex 2, France

Received 12 February 2014; Accepted 12 August 2014; Published 22 September 2014

Academic Editor: Karen Panetta

Copyright © 2014 Yann Gavet and Jean-Charles Pinoli. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. W. M. Bourne and J. M. Enoch, “Some optical principles of the clinical specular microscope,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 29–32, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. A. Laing, M. M. Sandstrom, and H. M. Leibowitz, “Clinical specular microscopy,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 97, no. 9, pp. 1714–1719, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Y. Gavet and J.-C. Pinoli, “Visual perception based automatic recognition of cell mosaics in human corneal endothelium microscopy images,” Image Analysis and Stereology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 53–61, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. L. Vincent and B. Masters, “Morphological image processing and network analysis of cornea endothelial cell images,” in 3rd Image Algebra and Morphological Image Processing, P. D. Gader, E. R. Dougherty, and J. C. Serra, Eds., vol. 1769 of Proceedings of SPIE, pp. 212–226, San Diego, Calif , USA, June 1992.
  5. J. Angulo and S. Matou, “Automatic quantification of in vitro endothelial cell networks using mathematical morphology,” in Proceedings of the 5th IASTED International Conference on Visualization, Imaging, and Image Processing (VIIP '05), pp. 51–56, Benidorm , Spain, September 2005. View at Scopus
  6. S. Beucher and C. Lantuejoul, “Use of watersheds in contour detection,” in Proceedings of the International Workshop on Image Processing, Real-Time Edge and Motion Detection/Estimation, Rennes, France, 1979.
  7. P. Soille, Morphological Image Analysis: Principles and Applications, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2003.
  8. Y. Gavet and J.-C. Pinoli, “A geometric dissimilarity criterion between Jordan spatial mosaics. Theoretical aspects and application to segmentation evaluation,” Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 25–49, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  9. S. Ghose, A. Oliver, J. Mitra et al., “A supervised learning framework of statistical shape and probability priors for automatic prostate segmentation in ultrasound images,” Medical Image Analysis, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 587–600, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Schaap, C. T. Metz, T. van Walsum et al., “Standardized evaluation methodology and reference database for evaluating coronary artery centerline extraction algorithms,” Medical Image Analysis, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 701–714, 2009, Includes Special Section on the 12th International Conference on Medical Imaging and Computer Assisted Intervention. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. H. A. Kirişli, M. Schaap, C. T. Metz et al., “Standardized evaluation framework for evaluating coronary artery stenosis detection, stenosis quantification and lumen segmentation algorithms in computed tomography angiography,” Medical Image Analysis, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 859–876, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. I. E. Abdou and W. K. Pratt, “Quantitative design and evaluation of enhancement/thresholding edge detectors,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 753–763, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. K. C. Strasters and J. J. Gerbrands, “Three-dimensional image segmentation using a split, merge and group approach,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 307–325, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. H. Minkowski, “Volumen und Oberfläche,” Mathematische Annalen, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 447–495, 1903. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  15. B. Moretti, J. M. Fadili, S. Ruan, D. Bloyet, and B. Mazoyer, “Phantom-based performance evaluation: application to brain segmentation from magnetic resonance images,” Medical Image Analysis, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 303–316, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M.-M. Deza and E. Deza, Dictionary of Distances, Elsevier, 2006.
  17. A. Tversky, “Features of similarity,” Psychological Review, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 327–352, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. Tversky and I. Gati, “Similarity, separability, and the triangle inequality,” Psychological Review, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 123–154, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. K. Hameeteman, M. A. Zuluaga, M. Freiman et al., “Evaluation framework for carotid bifurcation lumen segmentation and stenosis grading,” Medical Image Analysis, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 477–488, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and J. H. Friedman, The Elements of Statistical Learning, vol. 1, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2001.