International Journal of Endocrinology

International Journal of Endocrinology / 2011 / Article

Clinical Study | Open Access

Volume 2011 |Article ID 916380 |

Vasan Sathya Srini, Srinivas Belur Veerachari, "Does Varicocelectomy Improve Gonadal Function in Men with Hypogonadism and Infertility? Analysis of a Prospective Study", International Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 2011, Article ID 916380, 6 pages, 2011.

Does Varicocelectomy Improve Gonadal Function in Men with Hypogonadism and Infertility? Analysis of a Prospective Study

Academic Editor: Maria L. Dufau
Received15 Jul 2011
Accepted04 Oct 2011
Published29 Nov 2011


Varicocele in infertile males is associated with Leydig cell dysfunction and hypogonadism. The effect of varicocelectomy on serum testosterone level is not yet established. We analysed 200 heterosexual infertile men diagnosed to have clinical varicocele they were divided into two groups: group 1 (100 men) had microsurgical varicocelectomy, and group 2 (100 patients) underwent assisted reproduction procedures. All participants had semen analysis, serum levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), prolactin, and total testosterone (TT), measured both at recruitment time and 6 months later. In group 1, the mean TT level increased significantly after varicocelectomy ( to  ng/dL, ) and testicular size correlated with the mean change in TT ( ). No similar change was found in group 2. Out of the 100 patients in group 1, 78 had postoperative normalization of TT unlike only 16 men in group 2.

1. Introduction

The prevalence of a varicocele among the general male population is about 15%, whereas it is reported that 19% to 41% of infertile men have a palpable varicocele [1]. Theories related to the negative effect of varicocele on testicular functions include testicular hyperthermia, hormonal dysfunctions, increased testicular blood flow due to venous engorgement, reflux of renal or perirenal metabolites, and hypoxia [24]. Weiss et al. [5] reported impaired testosterone synthesis in patients with varicocele. Other studies have suggested Leydig cell dysfunction and impaired testosterone synthesis [6, 7]. The effect of varicocelectomy on serum testosterone level is not yet fully established. While some studies found no significant effect, others reported a normalization of the testosterone level following surgical repair of the varicocele [712]. In a study conducted by Gat et al., it was concluded that varicocele is a bilateral disease and the damage to the testicular tissue was hypoxia which deteriorates sperm production and testosterone production due to abnormal arterial flow of oxygen to the sperm production site (Seminiferous tubules) and the testosterone production site Leydig cells. It is caused due to the destruction of the one-way valve mechanism in the internal spermatic veins which leads to increase in hydrostatic pressure in the testicular venous drainage system exceeding the pressure of the testicular arterial system. This is a unique biological phenomena that exists in the bipedal, human species due to the erect posture [10].

Normal serum testosterone is essential in maintaining peripheral autonomic and sensory nerve structure [13] as well as the function of many pelvic ganglion neurons [14]. Androgen plays an important role in regulating nitric oxide synthase isoforms in penile tissue [1517]. Testosterone is also important for erectile function, as the trabecular smooth muscle is regulated for detumescence and erection [18].

There are very few studies in the literature analyzing androgen deficiency in infertile men with varicocele and the impact of varicocelectomy on hypogonadal status. Hence, we designed a prospective nonrandomized comparative study with the aim to investigate the effect of varicocelectomy on serum total testosterone (TT) level.

2. Materials and Methods

We included 200 heterosexual infertile men diagnosed to have clinical varicocele associated with primary or secondary infertility with a serum testosterone level < 280 ng/dL. All men had been in a stable sexual relationship for at least 12 months. The varicocele was detected by physical examination and confirmed by color flow Doppler ultrasound examination. All participants had semen analysis, serum levels of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), prolactin, and total testosterone (TT), measured both at recruitment time, 6 and 12 months later. All of them signed an informed consent to be enrolled for the study, and institutional review board approval was obtained before the start of the study which was nonrandomized prospective controlled study.

2.1. Exclusive Criteria

They excluded participants with history of undescended testis, mumps orchitis, hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, hyperprolactinemia, use of testosterone replacement therapy and/or antiestrogen, aromatase enzyme inhibitors, morbid obesity with body mass index (BMI) ≥40 kg/m2, uncontrolled diabetes (glycated hemoglobin > 7%) or uncontrolled hypertension (blood pressure ≥ 140/90) after chemotherapy, after radiotherapy, and after orchidectomy.

2.2. Intervention

In addition to routine medical history taking, general and genital examination, all participants underwent semen analysis according to the World Health Organization guidelines [19]. Serum TT was measured in the morning using the electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) used on the Roche Elecsys 2010 (Hitachi, Japan) (normal range 280–800 ng/dL). Serum FSH, LH, and prolactin were also measured using the ECLIA, Roche, Japan. The normal ranges are 1.5–12.4 mIU/mL, 1.7–8.6 mIU/mL, and 4.6–21.4 ng/dL, respectively.

Scrotal sonography was performed with the participant in the supine position. Examinations were performed with high-resolution ultrasound transducers (7.5 MHz) linear arrays, which were appropriate for all participants. Gray-scale imaging was used to determine the volume of the testis ([length × width × thickness] × 0.52). Maximum vein diameter was measured. Color Doppler was then used to detect the reversal of blood flow in the veins [20]. In cases with bilateral varicocele, the average vein diameter was used for statistical correlations.

Couples were counseled about their case, and the exact nature of the problem was explained. They were asked to choose between microsurgical varicocelectomy or in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) attempts. The nature of each approach was discussed with the participants.

The microsurgical varicocelectomy procedure was performed as described by Zini et al. [21]. Both external and internal spermatic veins were ligated and divided, while the testicular artery and lymphatic vessels were spared.

Participants were asked to revisit the centre after 6 and 12 months. A new semen analysis was performed, and a morning blood sample was withdrawn for the measurements of TT, FSH, and LH.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics (mean ± standard deviation, as well as frequencies and percentages) were computed for all clinical and demographic variables. Median (quartiles) expressed data were not distributed. Comparisons between the two groups were carried out using an unpaired Student’s t-test. Based on Kolmogorov-Smirnov test used to test the parameter distribution normality, if the parameters are not normally distributed, nonparametric tests were used and are mentioned when used below the tables. Chi-square was used for contingency table analysis; Pearson’s correlation coefficients were computed to determine the strength and form of associations. For non-normally distributed data Spearman’s methods were used. All analysis was conducted using SPSS 8.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill, USA). Significance determined at 0.05 was used throughout all statistical tests. All P values reported in this paper are two-tailed unless stated otherwise.

3. Results

We included 200 heterosexual infertile men diagnosed to have varicocele. They were divided into two groups: group 1 (study group) underwent microsurgical varicocelectomy, and group 2 (control group) opted for assisted reproduction techniques (ART). The first hundred patients choosen for either group were included in the study. One hundred forty-nine had primary infertility, while fifty-one had secondary infertility.

The distributions of patients in terms of age group were almost similar. The age ranged from 24 years to 49 years. The mean age was years in the study group and years in the control group (Table 1). The infertility duration in study group was years and in control group was years (Table 6).

Age in yearsNumber of patients study groupNumber of patients control group


Mean ± SD: —Study Group.
Mean ± SD: —Control Group.

In study group, 34 (17%) participants had bilateral varicocele and 66 (33%) had left varicocele. In control group, 36 (18%) participants had bilateral varicocele and 64 (32%) had left varicocele (Table 2).

GroupBilateralLeft only


The average testosterone levels in the study group was  ng/dL and the average testosterone levels in the control group were  ng/dL (Table 3).

GroupS. testosterone (ng/dL)


The average testes sizes were  mL and  mL for study and control groups, respectively ( ) (Table 4).

GroupTestes size (mL)


The average internal spermatic vein diameters were  mm and for study and control groups, respectively ( ) (Table 5).

GroupVein diameters (mm)

Study3.79 + 0.42
Control3.52 + 0.37

VariablesControl groupStudy groupP value

Age (years) 0.012*
Duration of subfertility/infertility (years) <0.001**
Total testosterone (ng/mL) 0.001**
Testicular size (cc) 0.119
Max vein diameter (mm) 0.046*
Semen analysis: count (millions/mL) 0.477

Decreased sexual desire was seen in 76 participants of study group and in 68 participants of control group. Premature ejaculation was observed in 19 in the study group and in 12 in control group. There were nonsignificant differences in clinical parameters, semen parameters, FSH, LH, and prolactin levels between men who underwent varicocelectomy and those who opted for ART.

In study group, TT rosed significantly from  ng/mL before varicocelectomy to  ng/mL after 12 months of follow-up postsurgery (Table 7). There was a significant positive correlation between the mean change in TT in this group Δ + 1.240 ( ). This was associated with an insignificant drop in serum LH and serum FSH levels. In control group, nonsignificant reduction was seen during the follow-up period of 6 months. The vein diameter did not correlate with the change in the TT values. However, a significant correlation was found with the mean testicular size change from  cc to  cc, and with change of Δ + 1.508 and change in the TT values Δ + 1.240 ( ) before and after surgery.

VariableControl groupStudy groupP value

Total testosterone (ng/mL)Before 0.001**
After <0.001**
P value0.005**<0.001**

Testicular size (cc)Before8.76±1.92 0.119
After7.99±2.73 <0.001**
P value<0.001**<0.001**

Sperm count (millions/mL)Before 0.477
After <0.001**
P value0.683<0.001**

Δ is the difference.
Within group analysis by Student test (Paired).
Between group analysis by student test (Unpaired).

The mean change in TT in men who underwent bilateral varicocelectomy was from  ng/mL to  ng/mL, with change of Δ + 1.18 was found to be lower than those who underwent left varicocelectomy in whom the mean change in TT was from  ng/mL to  ng/mL, with change of Δ + 1.27, the difference however was found to be insignificant.

There was also significant improvement in sperm count from millions/mL to millions/mL ( ) and the percent of progressively motile sperm. There was no significant change in sperm volume, viability, or percent of abnormally formed sperm after surgery.

In the study group, 44 of the participants suffered from ED before varicocelectomy, as compared with 31 after 12 months of surgery ( ). However, in the control group, there was an increase from 39 to 41 in the participants who suffered ED during the follow-up period. This was an incidental isolated finding of this study.

4. Discussion

The serum testosterone level showed significant increase after varicocelectomy unlike the changes in the control group in our study. This is in agreement with the previous work of other authors [810]. Su et al. [8] reported that serum TT, but not FSH or LH levels, increased following microsurgical varicocelectomy. The increase in serum TT was greater in cases of bilateral varicocelectomy as compared with unilateral cases [8]. In our study, we failed to demonstrate such differences. Hurtado de Catalfo et al. [9] also reported normalization of testosterone levels in patients who underwent microsurgical varicocelectomy. Gat et al. [10] reported significant increases in serum TT and free testosterone following spermatic vein embolization not related to the varicocele clinical grade. Su et al. [8] also reported no significant correlation between varicocelectomy clinical grade and postvaricocelectomy improvement in serum TT. Pasqualotto et al. [22] reported that postoperative serum TT increases were limited to patients who had more than 10 veins ligated during varicocelectomy. The clinical grade and the vein diameter might not be the determining factors for how varicocele affects testicular functions. Shiraishi et al. [23] showed that scrotal temperature is related to the deterioration in sperm density, sperm motility, and serum FSH and testosterone levels irrespective of the varicocele grade.

Serum testosterone increased after varicocelectomy in the study group. However, the magnitude of this increase was not the same in all participants. The same observation had been documented by other investigators [11, 12]. These findings suggest that improved spermatogenesis might have a mechanism other than increased testosterone production. Moreover, classification of men based on their preoperative TT may explain variation in TT improvement between different studies. Many studies that failed to demonstrate the positive change in the serum testosterone level following varicocelectomy did not characterize patients with low preoperative serum testosterone. Reşorlu et al. [24] reported no changes in serum TT levels following varicocelectomy in 96 patients treated for infertility. Our results are in agreement with Su et al. [8] in that they observed an inverse correlation between preoperative testosterone levels and changes in testosterone levels after varicocelectomy [8]; however, in our study, we were unable to demonstrate the same. This suggests that varicocelectomy can reverse the Leydig cell dysfunction induced by varicocele in certain patients. Rajfer et al. [25] reported decreased testicular testosterone following induction of varicocele in rats. This is confirmed by Ghosh and York in their study [26]. The mechanism by which testosterone synthesis is affected is not yet clear. Possible mechanisms include reduced activity of 17,20-desmolase and 17-alpha-hydroxylase enzymes as a result of testicular hyperthermia [27] and impaired Leydig cell response to gonadotrophin stimulation [28, 29].

In this current study, serum LH and serum FSH decreased insignificantly following varicocelectomy in the hypogonadal patients (study group), while there was no significant change in the control group; this might be attributed to improvement in Leydig cell function, which was increased due to raise in serum TT in the study group. Previous researchers reported no effect of varicocelectomy on serum LH, even when mean serum TT levels improved [8]. This might be due to the fact that eugonadal and hypogonadal patients were mixed together in the patient population.

It was also noticed that the study group in whom varicocelectomy was done noticed improved erectile function postoperatively. This might be related to improvement in the TT level which plays an important role in the male sexual response and regulates the timing of the erectile process as a function of sexual desire, thereby coordinating penile erection with sex [30]. After varicocelectomy, we observed a significant positive correlation between the mean change in TT in the varicocelectomy group (+1.18 ng/mL) and testicular size (+1.508 cc) improvement. This correlation was not found in the control group: the mean TT change was −0.0748 ng/mL, and the mean change in testicular size was −0.798 cc ( ). The TT normalized in 77% of the varicocelectomy patients with hypogonadism. In our study we noted a significant normalization of TT values due to the marginal lower TT levels before varicocelectomy as compared to other studies which shows the importance of early diagnosis and surgical treatment. Few previous researchers have reported the relationship between varicocele and hypogonadism [31, 32]. Younes [31] reported on 48 impotent men who underwent bilateral varicocelectomy. He reported that the serum testosterone level was significantly increased in impotence and male infertility compared to levels achieved in fertile groups. He also reported that the improvement of sexual activity was 50–70%.

Hypoactive sexual desire was found in 144/200 (72%) of men, and premature ejaculation was observed in 31/200 (15.5%). Lotti and coworkers [33] elegantly analyzed the impact of varicocele on sexual function in a large series of subjects. It is important to note the negative impact of infertility on sexual desire [3438]. Smith et al. [38] reported that male factor infertility is an important clinical significant predictor of sexual and personal strain independent of age, race, religion, household income, educational level, and prior fertility characteristics. Moreover, Drosdzol and Skrzypulec [39] pointed out that diagnosed male factor and infertility duration of 3–6 years were connected with the highest relationship instability and the lowest sexual satisfaction both in female and male infertile. The infertility duration reported in the later study is similar to the median duration in the current study, years in study group. However, the significant difference in infertility duration among the study group and the control group may eliminate this factor as a cause of sexual dysfunction at baseline and in the follow-up visits. The overall frequency of ED was found to be 76 (53.9%) which is lower than what is reported by Lotti et al. [33] (94.7%). The difference is probably related to the study population itself. Their mean age was reported to be years as compared to our younger participants years in the study group.

Three patients in the study group had mild intermittent scrotal discomfort. The discomfort resolved completely after varicocelectomy. This relief was reported by other investigators [4042]. However, we do not think that such discomfort could affect sexual activity. The reported frequency of pain and discomfort associated with varicocele is 2–10% [43]. In this study, it was 3% much same as per the literature. Because of this small number, it is difficult to discuss the possible effects on pain relief after varicocelectomy and its impact on sexual activity.

5. Conclusion

Varicocelectomy improves serum testosterone level significantly in men with hypogonadism and infertility. It also improves the erectile dysfunction status of the men with hypogonadism. Further randomized controlled studies are needed to prove the favorable outcome of varicocelectomy in men with hypogonadism and infertility.

Ethical Approval

This work being a standard known therapy and no deviation from normal protocol for management of above condition has been adapted for this study. There are no ethical issues on the same.


This work was partly supported by a grant from Ankur RITS 2011 (program for research: AAOFA6277D, Invoice no. 212).


  1. A. T. K. Cockett, H. Takihara, and M. J. Cosentino, “The varicocele,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 5–11, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  2. A. Valeri, D. Mianné, F. Merouze, L. Bujan, A. Altobelli, and J. Masson, “Scrotal temperature in 258 healthy men, randomly selected from a population of men aged 18 to 23 years old. Statistical analysis, epidemiologic observations, and measurement of the testicular diameters,” Progrès en Urologie, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 444–452, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  3. C. Romeo, T. Arrigo, P. Impellizzeri et al., “Altered serum inhibin b levels in adolescents with varicocele,” Journal of Pediatric Surgery, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 390–394, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. F. S. Camoglio, N. Zampieri, M. Corroppolo et al., “Varicocele and retrograde adrenal metabolites flow: an experimental study on rats,” Urologia Internationalis, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 337–342, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. D. B. Weiss, L. J. Rodriguez-Rigau, K. D. Smith, and E. Steinberger, “Leydig cell function in oligospermic men with varicocele,” Journal of Urology, vol. 120, no. 4, pp. 427–430, 1978. View at: Google Scholar
  6. E. Della Morte, F. F. Fortuna, G. Gerevini, C. Lania, and M. Grasso, “Evaluation of FSH and Leydig cells function in patients with varicocele,” Archivio Italiano di Urologia, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 152–156, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  7. S. Cayan, A. Kadioglu, I. Orhan, E. Kandirali, A. Tefekli, and S. Tellaloglu, “The effect of microsurgical varicocelectomy on serum follicle stimulating hormone, testosterone and free testosterone levels in infertile men with varicocele,” British Journal of Urology International, vol. 84, no. 9, pp. 1046–1049, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. L. M. Su, M. Goldstein, and P. N. Schlegel, “The effect of varicocelectomy on serum testosterone levels in infertile men with varicoceles,” Journal of Urology, vol. 154, no. 5, pp. 1752–1755, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. G. E. Hurtado de Catalfo, A. Ranieri-Casilla, F. A. Marra, M. J. T. de Alaniz, and C. A. Marra, “Oxidative stress biomarkers and hormonal profile in human patients undergoing varicocelectomy,” International Journal of Andrology, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 519–530, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. Y. Gat, M. Gornish, A. Belenky, and G. N. Bachar, “Elevation of serum testosterone and free testosterone after embolization of the internal spermatic vein for the treatment of varicocele in infertile men,” Human Reproduction, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 2303–2306, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. C. Ozden, O. L. Ozdal, S. Bulut, O. Guzel, H. H. Koyuncu, and A. Memis, “Effect of varicocelectomy on serum inhibin B levels in infertile patients with varicocele,” Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 441–443, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Y. Q. Zheng, X. Gao, Z. J. Li, Y. L. Yu, Z. G. Zhang, and W. Li, “Efficacy of bilateral and left varicocelectomy in infertile men with left clinical and right subclinical varicoceles: a comparative study,” Urology, vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 1236–1240, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. R. S. Rogers, T. M. Graziottin, C. M. Lin, Y. W. Kan, and T. F. Lue, “Intracavernosal vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injection and adeno-associated virus-mediated VEGF gene therapy prevent and reverse venogenic erectile dysfunction in rats,” International Journal of Impotence Research, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 26–37, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. S. M. Meusburger and J. R. Keast, “Testosterone and nerve growth factor have distinct but interacting effects on structure and neurotransmitter expression of adult pelvic ganglion cells in vitro,” Neuroscience, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 331–340, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. K. Baba, M. Yajima, S. Carrier et al., “Delayed testosterone replacement restores nitric oxide synthase-containing nerve fibres and the erectile response in rat penis,” British Journal of Urology International, vol. 85, no. 7, pp. 953–958, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. S. I. Seo, S. W. Kim, and J. S. Paick, “The effects of androgen on penile reflex, erectile response to electrical stimulation and penile NOS activity in the rat,” Asian Journal of Andrology, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 169–174, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  17. J. A. Lungg, J. Rajfer, and N. F. Gonzalez- Cadavid, “Dihydrotestosteroneis the active androgen in the mainteinance of nitric oxide-mediated penile erection in the rat,” Endocrinology, vol. 136, pp. 1495–1501, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  18. A. M. Traish, K. Park, V. Dhir, N. N. Kim, R. B. Moreland, and I. Goldstein, “Effects of castration and androgen replacement on erectile function in a rabbit model,” Endocrinology, vol. 140, no. 4, pp. 1861–1868, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  19. World Health Organisation, Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Sperm and the Sperm- Cervical Mucus Interaction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1999.
  20. A. F. Hussein, “The role of color Doppler ultrasound in prediction of the outcome of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy,” Journal of Urology, vol. 176, no. 5, pp. 2141–2145, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. A. Zini, M. A. Fischer, D. Bellack et al., “Technical modification of microsurgical varicocelectomy can reduce operating time,” Urology, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 803–806, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. F. F. Pasqualotto, A. M. Lucon, P. M. de Góes et al., “Relationship between the number of veins ligated in a varicocelectomy with testicular volume, hormonal levels and semen parameters outcome,” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 245–249, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. K. Shiraishi, H. Takihara, and H. Matsuyama, “Elevated scrotal temperature, but not varicocele grade, reflects testicular oxidative stress-mediated apoptosis,” World Journal of Urology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 359–364, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. B. Reşorlu, C. Kara, E. Şahin, and A. Ünsal, “The significance of age on success of surgery for patients with varicocele,” International Urology and Nephrology, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 351–356, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. J. Rajfer, T. T. Turner, F. Rivera, S. S. Howards, and S. C. Sikka, “Inhibition of testicular testosterone biosynthesis following experimental varicocele in rats,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 933–937, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  26. P. K. Ghosh and J. P. York, “Changes in testicular testosterone and acid and alkaline phosphatase activity in testis and accessory sex organs after induction of varicocele in noble rats,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 271–276, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. M. Takeyama, M. Honjoh, M. Kodama et al., “Testicular steroids in spermatic and peripheral veins after single injection of hCG in patients with varicocele,” Archives of Andrology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 207–213, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  28. M. Fujisawa, A. Hayashi, O. Imanishi et al., “The significance of gonadotropin- releasing hormone test for predicting positive effects on Leydig cell function,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 61, pp. 779–782, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  29. M. L. Podesta, S. Gottlieb, R. Medel, G. Ropelato, C. Bergada, and E. M. Quesada, “Hormonal parameters and testicular volume in children and adolescents with unilateral varicocele: preoperative and postoperative findings,” Journal of Urology, vol. 152, no. 2, pp. 794–797, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  30. G. Corona and M. Maggi, “The role of testosterone in erectile dysfunction,” Nature Reviews Urology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 46–56, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. A. K. H. Younes, “Low plasma testosterone in varicocele patients with impotence and male infertility,” Archives of Andrology, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 187–195, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  32. F. Comhaire and A. Vermeulen, “Plasma testosterone in patients with varicocele and sexual inadequacy,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 824–829, 1975. View at: Google Scholar
  33. F. Lotti, G. Corona, M. Mancini et al., “The association between varicocele, premature ejaculation and prostatitis symptoms: possible mechanisms,” Journal of Sexual Medicine, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 2878–2887, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. T. H. Wischmann, “Sexual disorders in infertile couples,” Journal of Sexual Medicine, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 1868–1876, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. L. S. Millheiser, A. E. Helmer, R. B. Quintero, L. M. Westphal, A. A. Milki, and R. B. Lathi, “Is infertility a risk factor for female sexual dysfunction? A case-control study,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 94, no. 6, pp. 2022–2025, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. A. Drosdzol and V. Skrzypulec, “Quality of life and sexual functioning of Polish infertile couples,” European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 271–281, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. S. D. Fosså and A. A. Dahl, “Fertility and sexuality in young cancer survivors who have adult-onset malignancies,” Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 291–303, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. J. F. Smith, T. J. Walsh, A. W. Shindel et al., “Sexual, marital, and social impact of a man's perceived infertility diagnosis,” Journal of Sexual Medicine, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 2505–2515, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. A. Drosdzol and V. Skrzypulec, “Evaluation of marital and sexual interactions of polish infertile couples,” Journal of Sexual Medicine, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 3335–3346, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. C. O. Yeniyol, A. Tuna, H. Yener, N. Zeyrek, and A. Tilki, “High ligation to treat pain in varicocele,” International Urology and Nephrology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 65–68, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. K. Karademir, T. Şenkul, K. Baykal, F. Ateş, C. Işeri, and D. Erden, “Evaluation of the role of varicocelectomy including external spermatic vein ligation in patients with scrotal pain,” International Journal of Urology, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 484–488, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. A. Chawla, G. Kulkarni, K. Kamal, and A. Zini, “Microsurgical varicocelectomy for recurrent or persistent varicoceles associated with orchalgia,” Urology, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 1072–1074, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. A. C. Peterson, R. S. Lance, and H. E. Ruiz, “Outcomes of varicocele ligation done for pain,” Journal of Urology, vol. 159, no. 5, pp. 1565–1567, 1998. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2011 Vasan Sathya Srini and Srinivas Belur Veerachari. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles