Research Article
Large-Scale Forest Modeling: Deducing Stand Density from Inventory Data
Table 2
Species-specific parameters and growth submodel fitting statistics.
| Species | | | | | Wood density (Mg m−3) | net increment | gross increment |
| Picea abies | 0.0081 | 64 | −0.45 | 0.23 | 0.38 | 0.77 | 0.30 | Larix sp.
*
| 0.0091 | 54 | −0.29 | 0.30 | 0.39 | 0.69 | 0.77 | Pseudotsuga menziesii | 0.0137 | 39 | −0.26 | 0.30 | 0.4 | 0.87 | 0.46 | Abies sp.
*
| 0.0091 | 54 | −0.41 | 0.23 | 0.39 | 0.63 | 0.26 | Pinus sylvetris, Pinus nigra | 0.0092 | 64 | −0.33 | 0.30 | 0.43 | 0.93 | 0.82 | Pinus pinaster | 0.01 | 64 | −0.34 | 0.30 | 0.43 | 0.71 | 0.43 | Populus sp.
*
| 0.0227 | 22 | −0.37 | 0.30 | 0.4 | 0.89 | 0.70 | Quercus sp.
*
| 0.0079 | 74 | −0.38 | 0.45 | 0.57 | 0.85 | 0.59 | Fagus sylvatica | 0.0077 | 69 | −0.24 | 0.50 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.66 | Betula sp.
*
| 0.0109 | 53 | −0.24 | 0.30 | 0.58 | 0.65 | 0.75 |
|
|
*based on more than one species of the same genus, species listed in [23]. Description of parameters and units in Table 1.
|