Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Forestry Research
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 2315329, 6 pages
Research Article

The Bioactive Compounds and Antioxidant Activity of Food Products of Rhizophora stylosa Fruit (Coffee and Tea Mangrove)

Department of Forest Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Kochi University, B-200 Monobe, Nankoku, Kochi 783-8502, Japan

Correspondence should be addressed to Yoshito Ohtani

Received 2 September 2017; Revised 2 December 2017; Accepted 10 December 2017; Published 10 January 2018

Academic Editor: Kurt Johnsen

Copyright © 2018 Dewi Indah Miranti et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


The objective of this study is to investigate the bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of coffee and tea mangrove (locally known in Indonesia) produced from the fruit of Rhizophora stylosa. Furthermore, three raw materials of coffee mangrove were also investigated to clarify their potencies. The crude extracts of five samples were subjected to antioxidant assay using DPPH. The results show that the extract of tea mangrove has the strongest activity; then, it was successfully fractionated using different polarity of solvents and yielded acetone and methanol fractions that had high antioxidant activity. The acetone fraction was purified and gave fractions A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, and A6, but only A2 and A3 indicated antioxidant activity and, therefore, they were subjected to further purification. Fractions A3 (caffeine) and A2 gave AS1 (N,N-dimethyl-L-alanine), AS2 (quercetin-3-O-galactopyranoside), AS3 (dodecanoic acid), and AS4 that had the similar 1H-NMR spectrometric results with AS2, while the methanol fraction did not exhibit clear peaks on the chromatogram by HPLC. Therefore, the precipitation method was conducted to purify this fraction, and the precipitate was analyzed by NMR spectra. The results from 1H and 13C NMR indicate that this fraction is a typical polymer of condensed tannins, containing procyanidin and prodelphinidin units.

1. Introduction

Mangroves are defined as the type of forest comprising woody plants or shrubs, living at the interface of land and sea in tropical and subtropical coastline [13]. The uses of mangroves can be classified at two major categories. Firstly, mangroves as buffer area to protect the coast from erosion, stabilize the sedimentation, and purify the coastal polluted water. Secondly, mangroves provide various products such as timber, fuel, food, and medicine and also are a source of bioactive compounds [1, 2].

Bioactive compounds are used not only for medicinal purpose, but also for functional food consumption [4]. Those bioactive compounds have beneficial effects for human health, for example, a role of antioxidant. Antioxidants possess an ability to scavenge free radicals, which cause many degenerative diseases. Some food resources of mangroves, such as the hypocotyl of Kandelia candel and the edible part of ripe and unripe Nypa fruticans fruit, have antioxidant activity due to the presence of phenolics [57]. It was reported by Bunyapraphatsara et al. [8] that the edible part of Rhizophora mucronata (young pods) exhibited the strong antioxidant activity. Several reports mentioned above indicate that further exploration of food originating from mangrove is important in order to find a new variety of the functional food materials.

Rhizophora stylosa is one of the dominant species in mangrove area of Indonesia, especially in Pamekasan Regency East Java. The fruit part including cotyledon is processed to coffee and tea within local society in this area. Coffee and tea mangrove have been manufactured by household industry since 2012 and 2015, respectively. Local folks who daily take both products recognize physiological activities, such as rejuvenation and fitness improvement. It means that some bioactive compounds in these products may exhibit such effects; however, no scientific evidence has been elucidated. Further study is desirable to clarify their phenomena; therefore, investigation of bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of coffee and tea mangrove has been conducted in this research.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

BHA, BHT, trolox, and 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) were from Nacalai Tesque, Inc. (Japan). All solvents (methanol, acetone, n-hexane, and ethyl acetate) used in this study were from Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. (Osaka, Japan).

2.2. Coffee and Tea Mangrove Materials

Coffee and tea mangrove were brought from Pamekasan Regency, East Java, Indonesia, in 2016. Both products are made from the fruit (including cotyledon) of species R. stylosa (Figure 1). This species bears viviparous seed. Their germination and seedling development actually occur on parent plant [9]. When seedling is matured and ready for regeneration, the fruit part (including cotyledon) is left useless on the tree. The fruit part is, therefore, used as the main ingredient of coffee and tea mangrove.

Figure 1: Photographs of Rhizophora stylosa and its seed.

The coffee mangrove is composed of the powders of mangrove fruits, gingers (Zingiber officinale), and Javanese long peppers (Piper retrofractum); all ingredients are prepared through sun-drying, roasting, and grinding processes. The supplemental materials such as ginger and Javanese long pepper are added as the flavor to enhance the coffee taste. Meanwhile, tea mangrove is a plain coarse powder from mangrove fruits without roasting process and supplemental materials.

In this study, the powder of mangrove fruit (R. stylosa), coffee mangrove, tea mangrove, ginger, and Javanese long pepper were used to clarify their potencies.

2.3. Extraction

Each powder of coffee mangrove, tea mangrove, mangrove fruit, ginger, and Javanese long pepper was extracted two times using 100% methanol (5 times volumes) at room temperature for 3 days each time. The methanol filtrates were evaporated using a rotary evaporator under reduced pressure at 45°C and then vacuum-dried to yield the crude extracts.

2.4. Isolation Procedures

The highest antioxidant activity was found in tea mangrove extract. 10 g of crude extract of tea mangrove was subjected to open column chromatography over silica-gel and eluted with solvents of increasing polarity from n-hexane (100%), n-hexane and ethyl acetate (50% : 50%), acetone (100%), and methanol (100%) to yield n-hexane (10 mg), n-hexane and ethyl acetate (900 mg), acetone (510 mg), and methanol (4240 mg) fractions, respectively (Table 2). All fractions were subjected to the antioxidant assay using DPPH, as a result acetone and methanol fractions exhibited high activity compared to the others.

Acetone fraction (510 mg) was further fractionated by HPLC (pump: L7110, detector (UV 254 nm): L7420, Hitachi Co.) at room temperature. First purification by HPLC was performed using ODS column (Mightysil, RP-18 GP 250-20, Kanto Chemicals Co.), eluted with 100% of methanol at flow rate 3 mL/min, and gave 6 fractions: A1 (13.7 mg), A2 (420.6 mg), A3 (12.7 mg), A4 (10.7 mg), A5 (5.3 mg), and A6 (22.7 mg). Among them, A2 exhibited high antioxidant activity and A3 also had relatively high antioxidant activity; therefore, second fractionation of A2 and purification of A3 by HPLC were performed by silica-gel semipreparative column (Wakosil 5SIL, Wako Chemicals Co.), eluted with n-hexane and ethyl acetate (50% : 50%), and A2 gave four compounds based on peaks: AS1 (2.5 mg), AS2 (2.9 mg), AS3 (3.5 mg), and AS4 (5.2 mg), and A3 gave single compound (2 mg).

For methanol fraction, a 605 mg of sample was dissolved in 10 mL methanol and added to 10 mL of benzene, to obtain precipitate (the process was done twice). The precipitate was filtered using a filter paper and vacuum-dried. Then, the purified acetone fraction A3 and the four subfractions, AS1, AS2, AS3, and AS4 and the 30 mg of dried precipitate from methanol fraction were subjected to further analyses using LC-MS and NMR.

The 50 mg of dried precipitate from methanol fraction was dissolved in KOH-methanol and methylated with dimethyl sulfate at room temperature. Then distilled water was added to this solution and the methylated compound was extracted with ethyl acetate. The resulting methylated compound from methanol fraction was analyzed by HPLC using GPC column (TSK gel G2000HS, Toso Co.) with chloroform.

2.5. LC-MS and NMR Analyses

Mass spectra were recorded using LCMS-8040 (Shimadzu, Japan), column, ODS 5 μm, Ø 4.6 mm × 150 mm (GL Science Co.); solvent was mixture of methanol and water (gradient; starting (50% : 50%) to 100% methanol). NMR spectra were recorded at 500 MHz for 1H and 125 MHz 13C on JNM-ECX500 system (JEOL Ltd.). Samples were dissolved in methanol d-4. The chemical shifts were expressed in ppm (δ) and were as follows: A3 (caffeine): LC-MS positive ion m/z 195 [MH]+; 1H-NMR (methanol d-4, 500 MHz, ppm): δ 3.3 (3H, s, H-1), 3.5 (3H, s, H-3), 4.0 (3H, s, H-5), 7.9 (1H, s, H-6); 13C-NMR (methanol d-4, 125 MHz, ppm): δ 28.2 (C-3), 30.1 (C-1), 33.9 (C-6), 108.7 (C-5), 143.9 (C-7), 149.8 (C-8), 153.2 (C-2), 156.7 (C-4). AS1 (N,N-dimethyl-L-alanine): LC-MS positive ion (m/z) 117 M+; 1H-NMR (methanol d-4, 500 MHz, ppm): δ 1.2 (3H, s, CH3), 2.5 (6H, s, 2CH3); 13C-NMR (methanol d-4, 125 MHz, ppm): δ 27.6 (CH3), 28.0 (CH3), 30.2 (CH), 174.3 (COOH). AS2 (quercetin-3-O-galactopyranoside): LC-MS positive ion (m/z) 445 [M-H]+; 1H-NMR (methanol d-4, 500 MHz, ppm): δ 5.38 d,  Hz, H-1′′, 6.27 d,  Hz, 1H, H-6, 6.78 d, = 2.0 Hz, 1H, H-8, 6.93 d,  Hz, H-5′, 7.49 d,  Hz, H-2′, 7.57 dd,  Hz,  Hz, H-6′, 3.74–3.26 m, 6H; 13C-NMR (methanol d-4, 125 MHz, ppm): δ 61.0 (C-6′′), 68.9 (C-4′′), 70.3 (C-2′′), 71.9 (C-3′′), 76.0 (C-5′′), 97.7 (C-6, C-8), 103.7 (C-1′′), 108.0 (C-10), 114.9 (C-2′), 115.6 (C-5′), 115.8 (C-1′), 117.4 (C-6′), 131.0 (C-3), 141.1 (C-3′), 144.0 (C-4′), 156.5 (C-2, C-9), 158.0 (C-5), 168.5 (C-7), 174.0 (C-4). AS3 (dodecanoic acid): LC-MS positive ion m/z 200 M+; 1H-NMR (methanol d-4, 500 MHz, ppm): δ 0.8 (3H, m, CH3), 1.2 (20H, m, 10CH2); 13C-NMR (methanol d-4, 125 MHz, ppm): δ 13.1 (CH3), 22.4 (CH2), 29.2 (CH2), 31.8 (CH2), 175.0 (COOH).

2.6. DPPH Assay

The assay for DPPH radical scavenging activity was performed to find out the antioxidant activity of the extracts and their fractions on preliminary and evaluation stages. Sample was added to a mixture (1.8 mL) of 0.25 mM DPPH in methanol solution, methanol, and acetic buffer solution to make final concentrations 0, 1.10, 2.19, 3.27, 4.34, 5.40, 10.52, 13.47, and 43.48 μg/mL. Absorbance was measured at 520 nm by spectrophotometer U-2810 (Hitachi Ltd.). BHA, BHT, and trolox were used as positive controls. The DPPH radical scavenging activity was calculated by the following equation: wherein was the absorbance of the solution with sample and was the absorbance of the solution without sample. The IC50, half maximal inhibitory concentration, was calculated using regression analysis and used to represent the activity of the substrate [10]. The assays were carried out in triplicate.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

The data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) in triplicate assays of antioxidant activity. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed with SPSS 16 followed by Duncan’s test to determine the significant differences between values at .

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Extraction Yields of Samples

Many studies have been conducted to extract and isolate bioactive compounds from plant material for utilization in food or pharmacy. Bioactive compounds range from polar compounds to nonpolar compounds, and the selected solvent affects efficiency of extraction. The types of solvent commonly used are alcohol (methanol and ethanol), acetone, diethyl ether, and ethyl acetate [11, 12]. In this study, the extract yields of the samples with methanol as a solvent range from 3.78% to 8.70% (Table 1). The highest extract yield was of Javanese long pepper and the lowest was of coffee mangrove.

Table 1: Methanol extractive yields of the samples.
Table 2: Stepwise fractionation of the extracts of tea mangrove with different solvents.

The tea mangrove extract was successively eluted with different solvents on silica-gel open column. The yield of each fraction was shown in Table 2. Methanol fraction (4240 mg) was dominant, and n-hexane and ethyl acetate fraction (900 mg) and acetone fraction (510 mg) were followed.

3.2. Isolation and Structure Identification

The acetone fraction was divided into the fractions A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, and A6 by HPLC with ODS column; however, only A2 and A3 indicated antioxidant activity in the preliminary test. Main fraction A2 (420.6 mg) was further subjected to HPLC with semipreparative silica-gel column and gave four compounds AS1–AS4 based on the peaks which amounted to only 14.1 mg. Most of A2 that could not be separated well seemed to be oligomer or polymer-like as methanol fraction mentioned later. A3 was rather single compound; therefore, it was purified by HPLC with silica-gel column. The compounds AS1–AS4 and A3 were analyzed by LC-MS and NMR spectra.

LC-MS analysis of A3 showed the molecular weight of m/z 195. Based on the 1H- and 13C-NMR spectral data and compared with previous studies [13, 14], A3 was identified as caffeine.

AS1, AS2, and AS3 were identified as N,N-dimethyl-L-alanine, quercetin-3-O-galactopyranoside [15], and dodecanoic acid, respectively (Figure 2). However, AS2 contained small quantity of impurity whose 1H-NMR spectrum had the signals assigned to theanine [16]. 1H-NMR spectrum of AS4 was similar to that of AS2, but the signals at 3.2–4.4 ppm were stronger and more complicated. It means AS4 may be like quercetin-3-O-(2′′-O-glucopyranoside)-galactopyranoside [17]. A2 showed mostly broad peaks on HPLC and seemed not to be a single compound.

Figure 2: Chemical structures of caffeine (a), N,N-dimethyl-L-alanine (b), quercetin-3-O-galactopyranoside (c), dodecanoic acid (d), and condensed tannins (e).

Methanol fraction of tea mangrove extract did not give any single compounds by HPLC; therefore, it was purified by precipitation method. Then, the precipitate was analyzed by NMR spectra. As shown in Figure 3, 13C-NMR spectrum of the precipitate reveals a typical polymer of condensed tannins, containing procyanidin (dominant) and prodelphinidin (minor) units [18, 19]. The signal assignment was compared based on previous study [1821]. The peaks at 150 and 160 ppm (C5, C7, C8a), 143.8 ppm (C3′, C4′), 114.2 to 118 ppm (C2′, C5′ and C6′), and 94 to 100 ppm (C8 and C6) showed the presence of procyanidin units (PC). Then, the peaks at 131 ppm (C4′, C1′) and 104 to 108 ppm (C2′, C6′) showed the presence of prodelphinidin units (PD). In addition, the ratio of 2,3-cis to 2,3-trans isomers could be determined through the distinct differences in their respective C2 chemical shifts from the region peaks area between 70 and 90 ppm [18, 21]. The C2 gave resonance at 75 ppm for cis form, but the resonance for trans form was not detected. It indicates that terminal units were all in cis form [21]. The C3 signals of both cis and trans isomers occurred at 71 ppm and at 36 ppm showed the extension units of C4 atoms.

Figure 3: 13C-NMR spectrum of the purified methanol fraction from tea mangrove extract.

GPC chromatogram of methylated methanol fraction purified by precipitation is shown in Figure 4. A few peaks appear at 1830, 1400, and 780 of molecular weights which correspond to pentamer, tetramer, and dimer, respectively. As a consequence, the average DP (degree of polymerization) is estimated to be around 4 and 5. It has been reported that procyanidin isolated from Camellia sinensis had 5.44 of average DP [22]. DP of the condensed tannins isolated from tea mangrove seems to be slightly lower than C. sinensis.

Figure 4: GPC chromatogram of the methylated methanol fraction of tea mangrove extract.
3.3. Antioxidant Activity

The assay of antioxidant activity was conducted within the extracts, fractionated materials, and some isolated compounds. Firstly, the assay was preliminarily to clarify the potency of each sample. Among those samples, tea mangrove exhibited the highest antioxidant activity with IC50 less than BHA (IC50 1.56 μg/mL) but higher than trolox (IC50 4.21 μg/mL). The other two extracts from mangrove fruit powder and coffee mangrove have partially good potent activity mostly equal to IC50 of trolox and BHT (IC50 4.52 μg/mL) as the positive controls (Table 3), while two samples, ginger and Javanese long pepper, have relatively low activity. High antioxidant activities of coffee and tea mangroves are therefore originated from mangrove fruit.

Table 3: Antioxidant activity of samples.

Tea mangrove extract had the strongest radical scavenging activity; therefore it was fractionated successively using 4 different solvents (Table 2). Among them, acetone and methanol fractions had high antioxidant activity (Table 4). Both fractions were subjected to HPLC in order to isolate some compounds from these fractions.

Table 4: Antioxidant activity of the fractions from tea mangrove extract.

The compound A3 (caffeine) and the purified methanol fraction (condensed tannins) obtained from tea mangrove extract were subjected to the antioxidant assay; the results are shown in Table 5. Caffeine exhibits low antioxidant activity (IC50 83.69 μg/mL), but condensed tannin (procyanidin), which mainly constitutes the acetone and methanol fractions of tea mangrove extract, has high antioxidant activity (IC50 2.69 μg/mL). The compounds AS2 and AS4, both quercetin derivatives, may have antioxidant activity considerably [23], but their quantities are very little. In conclusion, antioxidant activities of tea mangrove extract or mangrove fruit extract are mostly induced by the condensed tannins.

Table 5: Evaluation assay for antioxidant activity of two compounds from tea mangrove extract.

The tannins are able to donate electrons to free radicals, stabilize them, and alleviate harmful radical structures [24]. Several studies have also demonstrated the free radical scavenging activity of the condensed tannins [18, 19, 25, 26]. Therefore, mangrove fruit which is abundant in the condensed tannins must be the potential antioxidant agent.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare regarding the publication of this paper.


This research was supported by Japanese Government (Monbukagakusho: Mext) Scholarship Program and United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences Ehime University.


  1. D. M. Alongi, “Paradigm Shifts in Mangrove Biology,” in Coastal Wetlands: An Integrated Ecosystem Approach, G. M. E. Perillo, E. Wolanski, D. R. Cahoon, and M. M. Brinson, Eds., pp. 632-633, Elsevier, New York, NY, USA, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  2. W. M. Bandaranayake, “Bioactivities, bioactive compounds and chemical constituents of mangrove plants,” Wetlands Ecology and Management, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 421–452, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. P. Hogarth, The Biology of Mangroves and Seagrasses, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. C. Raghuveer and R. V. Tandon, “Review article: consumption of functional food and our health concerns,” Pakistan Journal of Physiology, vol. 5, pp. 76–83, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  5. W. M. Bandaranayake, “Traditional and medicinal uses of mangroves,” Mangroves and Salt Marshes, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 133–148, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. N. Prasad, B. Yang, K. W. Kong et al., “Phytochemicals and antioxidant capacity from Nypa fruticans Wurmb. Fruit,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2013, Article ID 154606, 9 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S.-D. Wei, H.-C. Zhou, and Y.-M. Lin, “Antioxidant activities of extract and fractions from the hypocotyls of the mangrove plant Kandelia candel,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 4080–4093, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. N. Bunyapraphatsara, A. Jutiviboonsuk, V. Srisukh et al., “Vegetables from the mangrove areas,” Thai Journal of Phytopharmacy, vol. 9, pp. 1–12, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  9. P. B. Tomlinson, Seedlings and Seeds. The Botany of Mangroves, Cambridge University Press, UK, 2nd edition, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. P. Molyneux, “The use of the stable radical Diphenylpicrylhydrazyl (DPPH) for estimating antioxidant activity,” Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 211–219, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  11. A. Dailey and Q. V. Vuong, “Effect of extraction solvents on recovery of bioactive compounds and antioxidant properties from macadamia (Macadamia tetraphylla) skin waste,” Cogent Food & Agriculture, vol. 1, no. 1, Article ID 1115646, pp. 1–10, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. C. D. Stalikas, “Review: extraction, separation, and detection methods for phenolic acids and flavonoids,” Journal of Separation Science, vol. 30, no. 18, pp. 3268–3295, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. Hayakawa and M. Kamata, Isolation of Caffeine by Using Sublimation from Tea Leaves and the Utilization for Chemical Teaching Material of Instrumental Analytical Experiment, Bulletin of The Faculty of Education. Natural Sciences. Nigata University, 2014.
  14. J. Sitkowski, L. Stefaniak, L. Nicol, M. L. Martin, G. J. Martin, and G. A. Webb, “Complete assignments of the 1H, 13C and 15N NMR spectra of caffeine,” Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 839–841, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Sikorska, I. Matławska, K. Glowniak, and G. Zgorka, “Qualitative and quantitative analysis of phenolic acids in Asclepias syriaca L,” Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica – Drug Research, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 69–72, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. G. Le Gall, I. J. Colquhoun, and M. Defernez, “Metabolite Profiling Using 1H NMR Spectroscopy for Quality Assessment of Green Tea, Camellia sinensis (L.),” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 692–700, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Z. P. Xiao, H. K. Wu, T. Wu, H. Shi, B. Hang, and H. A. Aisa, “Kaempferol and quercetin flavonoids from Rosa rugosa,” Chemistry of Natural Compounds, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 736-737, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. L.-L. Zhang, Y.-M. Lin, H.-C. Zhou, S.-D. Wei, and J.-H. Chen, “Condensed tannins from mangrove species Kandelia candel and Rhizophora mangle and their antioxidant activity,” Molecules, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 420–431, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. L. Z. Liang and M. L. Yi, “HPLC, NMR and MALDI-TOF MS analysis of condensed tannins from Lithocarpus glaber leaves with potent free radical scavenging activity,” Molecules, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 2986–2997, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Z. Czochanska, L. Y. Foo, R. H. Newman, and L. J. Porter, “Polymeric proanthocyanidins. Stereochemistry, structural units, and molecular weight,” Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions 1, vol. 1, pp. 2278–2286, 1980. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. X.-X. Chen, Y. Shi, W.-M. Chai, H.-L. Feng, J.-X. Zhuang, and Q.-X. Chen, “Condensed tannins from Ficus virensas tyrosinase inhibitors: Structure, inhibitory activity and molecular mechanism,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 3, Article ID e91809, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. X. Jiang, Y. Liu, Y. Wu et al., “Analysis of accumulation patterns and preliminary study on the condensation mechanism of proanthocyanidins in the tea plant [Camellia sinensis],” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, article no. 8742, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J.-H. Moon, T. Tsushida, K. Nakahara, and J. Terao, “Identification of quercetin 3-O-β-D-glucuronide as an antioxidative metabolite in rat plasma after oral administration of quercetin,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 1274–1285, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. V. Koleckar, K. Kubikova, Z. Rehakova et al., “Condensed and hydrolysable tannins as antioxidants influencing the health,” Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 436–447, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. D.-L. Li, X.-M. Li, Z.-Y. Peng, and B.-G. Wang, “Flavanol derivatives from Rhizophora stylosa and their DPPH radical scavenging activity,” Molecules, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 1163–1169, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. A. Zarin, H. Y. Wan, A. Isha, and N. Armania, “Antioxidant, antimicrobial and cytotoxic potential of condensed tannins from leucaena leucocephala hybrid-rendang,” Food Science and Human Wellness, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 65–75, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar