International Journal of Genomics

International Journal of Genomics / 2020 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 9369182 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9369182

Kejian Tian, Fanxing Meng, Qi Meng, Yan Gao, Lili Zhang, Le Wang, Yuqing Wang, Xue Li, Hongliang Huo, "The Analysis of Estrogen-Degrading and Functional Metabolism Genes in Rhodococcus equi DSSKP-R-001", International Journal of Genomics, vol. 2020, Article ID 9369182, 13 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9369182

The Analysis of Estrogen-Degrading and Functional Metabolism Genes in Rhodococcus equi DSSKP-R-001

Academic Editor: Atsushi Kurabayashi
Received11 Jun 2020
Revised27 Jul 2020
Accepted30 Jul 2020
Published26 Aug 2020

Abstract

Estrogen contamination is recognized as one of the most serious environmental problems, causing widespread concern worldwide. Environmental estrogens are mainly derived from human and vertebrate excretion, drugs, and agricultural activities. The use of microorganisms is currently the most economical and effective method for biodegradation of environmental estrogens. Rhodococcus equi DSSKP-R-001 (R-001) has strong estrogen-degrading capabilities. Our study indicated that R-001 can use different types of estrogen as its sole carbon source for growth and metabolism, with final degradation rates above 90%. Transcriptome analysis showed that 720 (E1), 983 (E2), and 845 (EE2) genes were significantly upregulated in the estrogen-treated group compared with the control group, and 270 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were upregulated across all treatment groups. These DEGs included ABC transporters; estrogen-degrading genes, including those that perform initial oxidation and dehydrogenation reactions and those that further degrade the resulting substrates into small molecules; and metabolism genes that complete the intracellular transformation and utilization of estrogen metabolites through biological processes such as amino acid metabolism, lipid metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, and the tricarboxylic acid cycle. In summary, the biodegradation of estrogens is coordinated by a metabolic network of estrogen-degrading enzymes, transporters, metabolic enzymes, and other coenzymes. In this study, the metabolic mechanisms by which Rhodococcus equi R-001 degrades various estrogens were analyzed for the first time. A new pollutant metabolism system is outlined, providing a starting point for the construction of engineered estrogen-degrading bacteria.

1. Introduction

Environmental estrogen is a type of endocrine disruptor (EDC) that has generated significant worldwide concern. After entering an organism, it interferes with hormone synthesis, secretion, transport, binding, reactions, and metabolism in ways that affect normal homeostasis and endanger reproduction, development, and behavior [1]. Estrogen is a fat-soluble substance whose basic nucleus is a steroid ring formed by the condensation of three six-membered rings and one five-membered ring [2]. Common estrogens include E1, E2, and EE2, which differ in the functional groups at C-17 (Figure S1). The estrogenic activity of 17α-ethynyl estradiol (EE2) is about 2.5 times greater than that of 17β-estradiol (E2), and the estrogenic activity of estrone (E1) is much lower (about 2.54% of E2) than that of E2. At present, estrogens in the environment are mainly derived from human and animal excreta [3] or enter the environment directly through composting. The large-scale use of estrogen drugs in the aquaculture industry has aggravated this process. In addition, sewage treatment plants do not completely remove estrogen, and it can be discharged into natural water bodies through effluent. Estrogens accumulate easily in organisms after entering the environment; their endocrine disruption is therefore stronger than that of other EDCs, and their impact on the environment is particularly significant [46]. Studies have shown that very low concentrations of estrogen can cause feminization of males in aquatic organisms [7, 8]. Estrogen can also affect the human body through direct contact with the skin and via enriched food chains. It can cause endocrine system disorders, female tumors, cancer, male infertility, and precocious puberty. In addition, it may interfere with gender differentiation in the brain, accelerate growth and estrus, increase weight, and cause immune disorders. Therefore, the World Health Organization has classified estrogens as group 1 carcinogens [9] (https://monographs.iarc.fr/list-of-classifications).

The microbial degradation of estrogen is mainly accomplished by bacteria and a small number of fungi and algae. Most estrogen-degrading bacteria have been identified from activated sludge, farmland soil, or compost in sewage treatment plants. At present, more than one hundred estrogen-degrading microorganisms have been reported [1034], and the estrogen degradation efficiency of some strains can reach more than 90% within a specific time period (Table S1). For example, Actinomycetes have very good substrate adaptation to high concentrations of estrogen and exhibit no delay in cell growth. At the same time, their estrogen degradation efficiency and degradation rate are relatively high. Among the 16 Actinomycetes that have been screened, five strains of high-efficiency estrogen-degrading bacteria have been identified, all belonging to the genus Rhodococcus. sp. Their degradation rates for estrogens E1, E2, E3, and EE2 are all greater than 95%. For example, Rhodococcus equi Y50156 and Rhodococcus zopfii Y50158 have a degradation at 24 h for 100 mg/L concentrations of the four estrogens listed above [11], and Rhodococcus rubber KC4 has a 99% degradation rate at 24 h for E2a at a concentration of 3 mg/L [15]. In our previous study, the degradation rate at 72 h for 50 mg/L E2 by R. equi DSSKP-R-001 was 97% [35], and the degradation rates at 96 h of 30 mg/L E1, E2, and EE2 were 100%, 100%, and 90%, respectively. Therefore, the Rhodococcus. sp shows significant promise for construction of engineered, estrogen-degrading bacteria.

Microbial degradation of estrogen is mainly accomplished through enzymatic reactions, and the genes encoding these enzymes are key to the biodegradation of organic matter. The genes OecA, encoding 3β, 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase; OecB, encoding estrone-4-hydroxylase; and OecC, encoding 4-hydroxyestrone 4,5-dioxygenase, are the key estrogen degradation genes in Sphingomonas sp. KC8 [36]. When Acinetobacter sp. DSSKY-A-001 was cultured with estradiol as the sole carbon source, Huo found that the dioxygenase gene, RspwpGM002188; the catechol 1,2 dioxygenase gene, RspwpGM001668; and the 7α-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase gene, RspwpGM001333, were involved in different E2 degradation stages and had high expression levels [37]. Ye et al. [38] used plasmid construction and heterologous expression to demonstrate that HSD, which encodes a 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase in Rhodococcus sp. P14, was related to the bacterium’s E2 degradation ability. In 2009, Petrusma et al. [39] successfully expressed the kshA and kshB genes from Rhodococcus rhodochrous DSM 43269 in E. coli and demonstrated that kshA catalyzed substrate hydroxylation due to the reductase properties of kshB. In 2011, Petrusma et al. [40] analyzed the enzymatic properties of five kshA gene products from Rhodococcus rhodochrous DSM43269. The five homologs, kshA1 to kshA5, belonged to four different gene clusters and exhibited significant overlap in their steroid substrates. Although the catabolic activity of kshA1 was specific to cholic acid, KshA5 was able to grow on many classes of steroids with no obvious substrate preference.

Although many detailed estrogen degradation pathways have been proposed [9, 27, 41], studies on the intracellular metabolism of estrogen have not been reported. At the same time, estrogen pollution is currently caused by multiple channels and multiple estrogens, and the study of bacterial estrogen degradation therefore has great practical significance. The purpose of this study was to characterize (1) the ability of R. equi DSSKP-R-001 to degrade different types of estrogen, (2) the effects of different types of estrogen on gene expression in R-001, and (3) the mechanism of estrogen metabolism in bacterial cells. We performed experiments with single and mixed carbon sources and used transcriptome sequencing to study gene expression in response to different estrogen treatments and explore the mechanism of estrogen metabolism. This paper reports the first attempt to study gene expression of R. equi in various estrogen cultures using transcriptomics. It further clarifies the metabolic response of R. equi to estrogens and provides guidance for the construction of functional strains.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strain and Chemicals

The R-001 strain used in this study was isolated from soil near a long-term estrogen-contaminated contraceptive plant in Beijing and was preserved at the China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center. Thallus was cultured in LB medium and placed in a constant-temperature shaking incubator at 30°C for 120 h at 120 rpm. The OD600 of the bacterial liquid was measured using a microplate reader (BioTek-ELX 800). A bacterial suspension of was used for degradation experiments. Studies have shown that estrogen concentration does not affect degradation mechanism: the degradation mechanisms of strains grown with high concentrations of estrogen are the same as those used when estrogen is present in typical water concentrations [42]. Therefore, the bacterial suspension was added to mineral basal medium supplemented with 30 mg/L estrogen or glucose at an inoculum rate of 3% by volume.

Estrone (E1), 17β-estradiol (E2), and 17α-ethynyl estradiol (EE2) used in this study were all 99% pure standard materials produced by Aladdin; acetonitrile in the HPLC mobile phase was produced by Sigma.

2.2. Estrogen Concentrations and Detection of Intermediate Products

A high-performance liquid chromatograph (HPLC; Shimadzu Co.) was used with a Zorbax Eclipse Plus C18 column (, 3.5 mm). Injected materials were detected at room temperature using a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min and a wavelength of 220 nm with an injection volume of 10 μL and a flow ratio of 1 : 1. The retention times of E1, E2, and EE2 were 10.853 min, 8.928 min, and 12.375 min, respectively. The standard curve () was prepared with OriginPro 2017 software based on the concentration and peak area of each substance, and sample estrogen concentrations were calculated from the curve. An Applied Biosystems PE Sciex API 2000 MDS LC/MS/MS System was used to analyze intermediate products in the process of estrogen degradation. The setting conditions were the same as those described for the HPLC measurements. At a temperature of 0°C, negative ions were used to scan in the range of 50–600 Da, and the collision energy (CE) was set to 35 ev.

2.3. RNA Extraction, Library Construction, and Transcriptome Sequencing

Bacteria were cultured as above, using estrogen for the treatment groups and glucose for the control group. Total RNA was extracted using the TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies, CA, USA). RNA quality control was performed in several steps: (1)RNA degradation and potential contamination were monitored on 1% agarose gels(2)RNA purity (OD260/OD280, OD260/OD230) was assessed using a NanoPhotometer® spectrophotometer (Implen, CA, USA).(3)RNA integrity was measured using a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA).

Briefly, the rRNA was removed from 1 microgram of total RNA using the Ribo-Zero Magnetic Gold Kit (Epicentre Biotechnologies, Madison, WI, USA). The TruSeq RNA Sample Prep Kit v2 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) was used for library construction. RNA was fragmented into small pieces using the Elute Prime Fragment Mix. First-strand cDNA was synthesized with First-Strand Master Mix and SuperScript II (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) reverse transcription (25°C for 10 min; 42°C for 50 min; 70°C for 15 min). After product purification with Agencourt RNAClean XP Beads (Beckman Coulter, CA, USA), the second-strand cDNA library was synthesized using Second Strand Master Mix and a dATP, dGTP, dCTP, and dUTP mix (1 h at 16°C). Purified fragmented cDNA was end-repaired (30 min at 30°C) and purified with AMPure XP Beads (Beckman Coulter, CA, USA). Addition of the poly(A) tail was performed with A-tailing Mix (30 min at 37°C) prior to the ligation of sequencing adapters (10 min at 30°C). The second-strand cDNA was degraded using the Uracil-N-Glycosylase enzyme (10 min at 37°C), and the product was purified using AMPure XP Beads. Several rounds of PCR amplification with PCR Primer Cocktail were performed to enrich the cDNA fragments, and the PCR products were purified using AMPure XP Beads.

Clustering of the barcoded samples was performed on a cBot Cluster Generation System according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After cluster generation, sequencing was performed using the Illumina HiSeq™ 2500 platform with paired-end 150 bp reads. Raw reads were submitted to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under the accession number PRJNA564375.

2.4. Read Filtering and Alignment

Raw data were filtered by (1) removing reads with ≥10% unidentified nucleotides (N), (2) removing reads in which >50% of the bases had PHRED quality scores of ≤20, and (3) removing reads that aligned to the barcode adapter using FASTP (https://github.com/OpenGene/fastp). Clean reads were mapped to the reference genome using Bowtie2 [43] (version 2.2.8) allowing no mismatches, and reads that mapped to ribosomal RNA were removed. Retained reads were aligned to the reference genome using Bowtie2 [43] (version 2.2.8) to identify known genes, and gene expression levels were quantified using RSEM [44].

2.5. Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes

Gene expression data were normalized using the fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads (FPKM) method to eliminate the influence of different gene lengths and sequencing depths on the calculation of gene expression. The edgeR package (http://www.r-project.org/) was used to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) with and a false discovery rate-adjusted value ( value) of <0.05. DEGs were then subjected to Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses, again using a value threshold of 0.05.

2.6. Real-Time Quantitative PCR Validation

Extracted RNA was subjected to reverse transcription using the HiScript 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Jizhen Biology, China). The qPCR reaction was carried out on a CFX96 instrument (Bio-Rad, USA) using AceQ qPCR SYBR Green Master Mix (Jizhen Biology, China). The reaction measurements were performed in biological triplicate. The reaction system consisted of 5 μL 2x SYBR Green Mix, 1 μL Primer_F+R (each 10 μM), 2 μL cDNA, and 3 μL ddH2O. Reaction conditions and primer designs are presented in Tables S2 and S3. The results were expressed relative to the expression levels of the recA reference gene in each sample using the 2ΔΔCt method.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Degradation of Estrogen

The degradation of different estrogens and the growth of R-001 were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography and a microplate reader. During the biodegradation of E1, the strain entered the logarithmic growth phase within 24 h. The E1 degradation rate reached 83.3% at 12 h and 98.6% at 48 h. The strain then gradually entered the decline phase with the depletion of its carbon source (Figure 1(a)). The biodegradation of E2 by R-001 was different from the biodegradation of E1. The substrate degradation rate was slower, and the strain showed an obvious lag phase. At 48 h, the strain entered the logarithmic growth phase, at which time the degradation rate reached 91.7%. After 96 h, E2 was completely degraded, and the strain entered the decline phase (Figure 1(b)). Similar to its biodegradation of E1, R-001 rapidly degraded EE2, and the degradation rate reached 84.7% at 24 h. The strain entered the logarithmic growth phase, and the degradation rate reached 90% at 72 h before entering the decline phase (Figure 1(c)). These experiments showed that R-001 can use different types of estrogen as a sole carbon source and that it has good biodegradation abilities for estrogens, with final degradation rates above 90%.

Nonetheless, there are many different estrogen contaminants in natural waters, and it is therefore particularly important to study the growth of estrogen-degrading strains and their estrogen-degrading ability in the presence of multiple estrogen types. The natural estrogens E1 and E2 and the artificial estrogen EE2 were selected as target pollutants for the culture system. E1 concentration increased slightly at 12 h and rapidly decreased after 12 h. This may be due to rapid degradation of E2 and EE2 at the beginning of the experiment, resulting in an accumulation of E1 as an intermediate product for a short time. The degradation trends of E2 and EE2 were similar. Biodegradation was rapid before 12 h and slowed after 12 h. The degradation rate of EE2 was 58.7% at 72 h and that of E2 was 97.3%. at 97 h. After that, the degradation process remained essentially stagnant (Figure 1(d)). During exposure to high concentrations of mixed estrogen pollutants, the estrogen-degrading bacteria R-001 could therefore use different types of estrogen for growth and metabolism, including both natural and artificial estrogens. Compared with their behavior under single estrogen culture conditions, the estrogen-degrading strains had slower rates of pollutant removal in the mixed substrate culture, and the final residual pollutant concentrations were higher. This may be related to the estrogen type, the high estrogen concentrations, and the relatively brief experimental period. Because the strain did not completely enter the decay phase at the end of the experiment, we can speculate that an extension of the experimental cycle may result in further removal of the mixed estrogens.

3.2. Overview of Transcriptome Sequencing Results
3.2.1. Data Reliability Analysis

We used transcriptome sequencing to study the key genes that play a role in R-001’s degradation of estrogen. Summary data from the sequencing experiment are shown in Table 1. After removing low-quality data and rRNA, a total of 40,916,088 reads were obtained for the assembly and analysis. Greater than 80% of the clean reads mapped to the reference genome, suggesting that the transcriptome sequence data were accurate and reliable. Sequence saturation analysis showed that as the amount of sequence data increased, the rate of detected transcripts plateaued, indicating that the number of detected transcripts had become saturated (Figure S2).


Sample nameRaw readsClean reads (%)Total reads (rRNA removed)Percent mapped reads (%)

G195,310,926194,813,492 (99.75%)10,537,19082.90
E1115,668,214115,284,564 (99.67%)9,237,73085.82
E243,752,69043,637,284 (99.74%)9,873,72888.88
EE243,013,65842,863,230 (99.65%)11,267,44098.29

To validate the transcriptome sequencing results, the expression of nine selected DEGs (choD, ksdI, hsaC, hsaD, kshA, tesI, HSD17B4, ksdD, and hsdA) was measured by real-time quantitative PCR in response to estradiol treatment (Figure S3). Their expression was consistent with that documented in the RNA-Seq experiment, with the exception of hsaC, whose expression was significantly higher.

3.2.2. DEGs under Different Estrogen Treatments

Compared with the glucose control group (Figure 2), R-001 treated with estrogen had 2047 DEGs (720 up and 1327 down), 2257 DEGs (983 up and 1274 down), and 2348 DEGs (845 up and 1503 down) when grown with E1, E2, and EE2, respectively (, ). There were 848 DEGs common to all treatment groups (578 down and 270 up), and 449, 517, and 404 DEGs unique to each treatment group (Figure 3).

3.2.3. Functional Classification of DEGs

Estrogens have very similar chemical structures. E1, E2, and EE2 were therefore selected as representative estrogens in experiments designed to (1) identify DEGs associated with estrogen biodegradation and metabolism and (2) investigate the mechanisms of estrogen metabolism.

GO analysis assigns putative functional annotations to DEGs and identifies significantly enriched GO terms in the DEG set, thereby predicting the main biological functions of the DEGs. According to the annotation results (Figure 4, Table S4), 12, 19 and 18 DEGs from the E1, E2, and EE2 treatments received GO annotations, respectively. Among the annotated DEGs, 36 were annotated with the term metabolic process, 21 with single-organism process, and 18 with cellular process in the Biological Process GO category. Likewise, 29 genes were annotated with the term catalytic activity and 15 with the term binding in the Molecular Function GO category. Twelve DEGs were annotated with the term cell and 12 with the term cell part in the Cellular Component GO category. The results are consistent with DEGs functioning in metabolism and in the catalytic activity of enzymes. Five of the common DEGs (C7H75_RS14070, C7H75_RS03905, C7H75_RS14550, C7H75_RS18270, and C7H75_RS18640) received GO annotations. C7H75_RS18270 was upregulated 7.13-fold and was annotated as a chaperone protein (Chaperonin GroES, groS). Studies have shown that molecular chaperones are part of the protein folding mechanism and help to maintain cellular homeostasis [45, 46]. GroEL/GroES overexpression can counteract nascent protein misfolding, increase adaptability, and expand “mutation space”. It can also increase bacterial resistance or tolerance, minimizing drug damage and promoting survival and growth in exponential culture [47, 48].

KEGG functional annotation results indicated (Figure S4) that DEGs were enriched in ABC transporters; amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism; aminobenzoate degradation; arginine biosynthesis; base excision repair; benzoate degradation; β-alanine metabolism; biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids; biotin metabolism; butyric acid metabolism; caprolactam degradation; chlorocyclohexane and chlorobenzene degradation; degradation of aromatic compounds; gene replication; fatty acid biosynthesis; fatty acid degradation and metabolism; fluorobenzoate degradation; lysine degradation; mismatch repair; niacin and nicotinamide metabolism; phenylalanine metabolism; polyketide biosynthesis; styrene degradation; thiamine metabolism; toluene degradation; tyrosine metabolism; and proline, leucine, and isoleucine degradation. The biodegradation of estrogens and other functions of significant DEGs will be discussed in greater detail below.

3.3. DEGs Related to Estrogen Degradation

HSD plays a major role in the dehydrogenation of steroid hormones. Both 17β-HSD recombinant strains and purified proteins can efficiently convert E2 into E1 by C17 dehydrogenation [49], and a similar role for HSD has been reported in some fungi and Pseudomonas sp. [5052]. In this study, significantly upregulated (13.60-fold and 13.41-fold) in response to E2 and EE2 treatments (Table 2), suggesting that 17β-HSD may be involved in C17 dehydrogenation during the degradation of steroid estrogens. E1 production was detected during E2 degradation (Figure S5), indicating that E2 may be degraded to E1 by 17β-HSD during the initial stages of the degradation process. The accumulation of E1 during the first 12 h of biodegradation further confirmed this view (Figure 1(d)).


Gene IDGene nameDescriptionLog2(FC)
G vs. E1G vs. E2G vs. EE2

C7H75_RS2198017β-HSD17beta-estradiol 17-dehydrogenasea13.6013.41
C7H75_RS02785kshA3-ketosteroid-9-alpha-hydroxylase oxygenase subunit1412.412.8
C7H75_RS08645kshA3-ketosteroid-9-alpha-hydroxylase oxygenase subunit11.71
C7H75_RS18910kshB3-ketosteroid-9-alpha-hydroxylase reductase subunit1.03
C7H75_RS04150tesI3-oxo-5alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase10.9111.95
C7H75_RS24110ksdISteroid Delta-isomerase14.3314.42
C7H75_RS03705fadD3AMP-binding enzyme2.761.89
C7H75_RS25395hsaCGlyoxalase6.0212.88
C7H75_RS00645hsaDAlpha/beta hydrolase11.83
C7H75_RS02355hsdAShort-chain dehydrogenase/reductase13.1112.36

aNo significant differential expression in this treatment group.

3-anthrone-9α-hydroxylase (KSH) is a two-component iron-sulfur monooxygenase that is widely distributed among sterol-degrading bacteria [39, 5355]. It consists of a terminal oxidase (kshA) and a reductase (kshB) [56]. KSH can add a hydroxyl group (9α-OH) at the C9 position of the polycyclic ring and participates with KSTD in carbon skeleton cleavage of the steroid nucleus B ring [57, 58]. Transcriptome results indicated that kshA (C7H75_RS02785/C7H75_RS08645) encoded a 3-indolone-9α-hydroxylase oxidase subunit that was upregulated 14-fold, 12.4/11.71-fold, and 12.8-fold in the E1, E2, and EE2 treatment groups (Table 2), respectively. The kshB gene (C7H75_RS18910) encoded a 3-indolone-9α-hydroxylase reductase subunit and was upregulated 1.03-fold in the EE2 group only. By contrast, kstd [5962], whose protein functions with KSH in B ring cleavage, was not identified in the E1 group and was downregulated in both the E2 and EE2 groups. The 3-oxo-5α-steroid 4-dehydrogenase gene tesI (C7H75_RS04150) was upregulated 14.1-fold, 13.57-fold, and 12.31-fold in the E1, E2, and EE2 groups, respcetively. Previously, Horinouchi et al. [63, 64] demonstrated that tesI is involved in the biodegradation of androsterone. It induces expression of testosterone degradation genes in Comamonas testosteroni TA441, indicating that its protein not only degrades testosterone but also functions in the degradation of other steroid substances. In addition, a gene encoding 4-hydroxyacetophenone monooxygenase was downregulated in the E2 group but upregulated by 1.16-fold in the E2 24 h group (data not shown), suggesting that it may function in the initial step of E2 degradation. The above genes may play a role in the degradation of E1 to 3-hydroxy-4,5-9,10-disecoestrane-1 (10), 2-diene-5,9,17-trione-4-oic acid (Figure 5, Figure S5), but their specific roles require further study. Finally, ksdI (C7H75_RS24110), fadD3 (C7H75_RS03705), hsaC (C7H75_RS25395), hsaD (C7H75_RS00645), and hsaA (C7H75_RS02355) were also significantly upregulated in the estrogen treatment groups.

3.4. DEGs Related to Metabolism

Metabolic processes provide the necessary energy for growth and organic matter degradation and play an important role in biodegradation. The DEGs shown in Table S5 are simultaneously identified in at least two treatment conditions. Their mechanisms of action are shown in Figure 5.

3.4.1. Transport

ABC transporters are involved in the transport of biological substances across cell membranes. They use the energy of ATP hydrolysis to transport a variety of substrates, including inorganic ions, sugars, amino acids, drugs, and toxic intermediates [65]. They play particularly important roles in cell nutrient uptake and toxic metabolite efflux [66, 67]. ABC transporter genes were significantly upregulated in response to estradiol treatment (Table 3, Figure 5). Although other transporters such as AtpA (ATP synthase A chain) and secE (preprotein translocase subunit) also play a role in estrogen transport, they showed little differential expression, and secE expression was significantly upregulated only under 50 mg/L estradiol treatment (data not shown). In addition, membrane ion transporters can promote substrate uptake by generating electrochemical gradients. However, ion transport DEGs in our experiment were downregulated, further suggesting an important role for ABC transporters in substrate uptake, although their specific mechanism of action will require further study.


Gene IDGene nameDescriptionLog2(FC)
G vs. E1G vs. E2G vs. EE2

C7H75_RS20820braFBranched-chain amino acid ABC transporter substrate-binding protein12.59a11.33
C7H75_RS19315braGABC transporter ATP-binding protein15.7212.8915.06
C7H75_RS20815livFABC transporter ATP-binding protein13.5612.77
C7H75_RS12365hmuVHeme ABC transporter ATP-binding protein14.0511.9512.5
C7H75_RS12945fepDABC transporter transmembrane protein2.11.61
C7H75_RS02430yfiYSubstrate-binding lipoprotein1.561.84
C7H75_RS04265ABC transporter substrate-binding protein12.6812.3
C7H75_RS11220Iron ABC transporter substrate-binding protein1.731.71
C7H75_RS21070ssuBNitrate ABC transporter ATP-binding protein1214.78
C7H75_RS08765ABC transporter substrate-binding protein15.8612.9114.19
C7H75_RS22280Lipoprotein3.334.27
C7H75_RS02015ABC transporter11.8811.6
C7H75_RS05615Mce family protein mce31.062.45
C7H75_RS10320metQABC transporter substrate-binding protein1.422.27

aNo significant differential expression in this treatment group.
3.4.2. Amino Acid Metabolism

DEGs were involved in 10 amino acid metabolic pathways (Table S5), described briefly in the following paragraphs. Proline, leucine, and isoleucine are metabolized to produce propionyl-CoA, acetoacetyl-CoA, acetyl-CoA, methacryloyl-CoA, and succinyl-CoA to generate NADH/FADH2 for electron transport and oxidative phosphorylation. Tyrosine is converted to fumarate and acetoacetate, and phenylalanine is converted to fumarate, succinate, and acetyl-CoA. Tryptophan is first converted to acetoacetyl-CoA, then to acetyl-CoA. Cysteine is oxidized to cysteine sulfuric acid, which is then converted to pyruvic acid by transamination. All of the above metabolites eventually enter the TCA cycle for further oxidation and energy production. The metabolism of glycine, serine, and threonine is a dehydratase-catalyzed deamination reaction that converts glycine and serine to pyruvate. Threonine is metabolized to homoserine or α-ketobutyric acid and then enters the cysteine/methionine metabolic pathway and the proline/leucine/isoleucine biosynthetic pathway or the propionic acid metabolic pathway to produce ATP (Figure 5).

Lysine is primarily metabolized by a transamination reaction, converted first to glutaryl coenzyme A and acetoacetyl-CoA and finally to acetyl-CoA. Histidine can eventually be metabolized to form glutamate, which is then converted to α-ketoglutarate by deamination via glutamate dehydrogenase. Metabolites of lysine and histidine enter the TCA cycle to produce energy for cell growth and development (Figure 5).

The metabolism of alanine produces pyruvic acid by transamination, which then enters the glycolysis/gluconeogenesis pathway. The aspartate metabolic pathway involves dehydrogenation to produce oxaloacetate or transamination to produce fumaric acid. Glutamate is converted to glutamine, which can be converted to proline and arginine by transamination or to α-ketoglutarate by glutamate dehydrogenase, after which it enters the TCA cycle [68]. In addition, glutamate can be transformed into succinic semialdehyde and then to succinic acid for the TCA cycle (Figure 5). Upregulation of amino acid metabolism genes promotes the production of intermediates for other metabolic processes such as carbohydrate and lipid metabolism and contributes to the energy production required for cellular processes. This is similar to the process by which Tween80 promotes the biodegradation of phenanthrene by Sphingomonas sp. GY2B and the biodegradation of nicotine by Aspergillus oryzae 112822 [68, 69].

3.4.3. Carbohydrate Metabolism

Carbohydrate metabolism provides the energy necessary for bacterial growth and substrate uptake. Glycolysis/gluconeogenesis supplies energy and maintains sugar levels in cells. After metabolism of starch and sucrose, glucose enters glycolysis to be converted to pyruvic acid, which is further metabolized to acetyl-CoA for use in the TCA cycle to generate energy. The DEG deoC of the parallel pentose phosphate metabolic pathway encodes deoxyribose-phosphate aldolase and was upregulated 13.45-fold and 12.31-fold in the E2 and EE2 treatment groups, respectively (Table S5, Figure 5). In addition to acting as a biocatalyst, this enzyme plays an important role in the pentose phosphate pathway, which prevents oxidative stress and maintains cellular homeostasis [70].

3.4.4. Fatty Acid Metabolism

Fatty acid metabolism can produce acetyl-CoA, which eventually enters the TCA cycle to provide the energy needed for cellular processes and substrate degradation (Figure 5). Liu et al. [68] showed that upregulation of fatty acid metabolism genes is an important complementary mechanism that promotes the biodegradation of phenanthrene. In our study, 19 genes associated with fatty acid metabolism were differentially expressed in estrogen-treated groups. For example, fabG was upregulated more than 10-fold in multiple treatment groups (Table S5). FabG belongs to the short-chain dehydrogenase reductase (SDR) family [71]; it is ubiquitous in bacteria and plays an important role in the synthesis of type II fatty acids [72] and fatty acid metabolism [73].

3.4.5. Tricarboxylic Acid Cycle

Pyruvic acid is an important link between amino acid, carbohydrate, and lipid metabolism and the TCA cycle. Eight significantly upregulated DEGs were associated with pyruvate metabolism (Table S5). Pyruvate metabolites such as oxaloacetic acid and other intermediates enter the TCA cycle to produce energy.

The TCA cycle is the final destination for products of carbohydrate, lipid, and amino acid metabolism; they are oxidized via the TCA cycle to produce reducing equivalents (NADH, FADH2, and GDP) for oxidative phosphorylation and, ultimately, ATP production. The TCA cycle also produces intermediates required for the biosynthesis of cellular components (Figure 5). A large number of DEGs were associated with the TCA cycle (Table S5).

The removal of estrogen organic pollutants by R-001 occurs mainly through biometabolism, which converts the pollutants into metabolites and energy required for cell growth. This process is complex and reversible. Organic materials can provide intermediates for the TCA cycle through fatty acid, carbohydrate, and amino acid metabolism. Conversely, the TCA cycle can provide precursors for cell components and energy for cellular processes. Oxidative phosphorylation can use reduced energy from the TCA cycle to produce ATP. The above biological processes are coordinated with one another to provide energy and materials for bacterial growth and reproduction, as well as the degradation of organic matter.

4. Conclusion

In this paper, the estrogen-degrading bacterium R. equi DSSKP-R-001 was shown to degrade estrogens with high efficiency, particularly estrone and 17β-estradiol. Its rate of estrogen removal was somewhat reduced in the presence of mixed estrogens. For the first time, we used high-efficiency, estrogen-degrading bacteria to investigate mechanisms of estrogen degradation; previous reports have used only a single type of estrogen. Our study shows that in addition to estrogen-degrading enzymes, transporters and metabolism-related enzymes also play an important role in converting macromolecular organics into the energy and materials needed for growth.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51978132) and the Jilin Province Natural Science Foundation (No. 20180101083JC).

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary 1. Supplementary figures: Figure S1: estrogen chemical structural formula. Figure S2: sequencing saturation map of strain R-001. a: E1, b: E2, c:EE2, d: G. Figure S3: differential expression of genes under estradiol treatment, comparison between RT-qPCR and RNA-seq. Figure S4: enriched bubble chart of KEGG for R-001 differentially expressed gene under steroid estrogen treatment. A: G-vs-E1, B: G-vs-E2, C: G-vs-EE2. Rich Factor refers to the ratio of the number of DEGs to the total number of genes in the pathway. A larger Rich Factor indicates a higher degree of enrichment. The closer the value is to zero, the more significant the enrichment is. Figure S5: estradiol metabolic pathway map of strain R-001 under E2 treatment. Red border: enzymes encoded by upregulated genes, green border: enzymes encoded by downregulated genes, and red+green border: enzymes encoded by both upregulated and downregulated genes.

Supplementary 2. Supplementary tables: Table S1: isolated estrogen-degrading bacteria. Table S2: the primer information in this study. Table S3: qPCR reaction procedure. Table S4: GO function enrichment analysis result. Table S5: DEGs related to metabolism of strain R-001 under different estrogen treatment conditions.

References

  1. T. Thum, V. J. Erpenbeck, J. Moeller, J. M. Hohlfeld, N. Krug, and J. Borlak, “Expression of xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes in different lung compartments of smokers and nonsmokers,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 114, no. 11, pp. 1655–1661, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. R. Liu, J. L. Zhou, and A. Wilding, “Simultaneous determination of endocrine disrupting phenolic compounds and steroids in water by solid-phase extraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1022, no. 1-2, pp. 179–189, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. R. Palme, P. Fischer, H. Schildorfer, and M. N. Ismail, “Excretion of infused 14C-steroid hormones via faeces and urine in domestic livestock,” Animal Reproduction Science, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 43–63, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J.-Q. Jiang, Z. Zhou, and V. K. Sharma, “Occurrence, transportation, monitoring and treatment of emerging micro-pollutants in waste water — a review from global views,” Microchemical Journal, vol. 110, pp. 292–300, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. S. Yang, F. I. Hai, L. D. Nghiem et al., “Understanding the factors controlling the removal of trace organic contaminants by white-rot fungi and their lignin modifying enzymes: a critical review,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 141, pp. 97–108, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. P. Laurenson, R. A. Bloom, S. Page, and N. Sadrieh, “Ethinyl estradiol and other human pharmaceutical estrogens in the aquatic environment: a review of recent risk assessment data,” The AAPS Journal, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 299–310, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. L. You, V. T. Nguyen, A. Pal et al., “Investigation of pharmaceuticals, personal care products and endocrine disrupting chemicals in a tropical urban catchment and the influence of environmental factors,” The Science of the Total Environment, vol. 536, pp. 955–963, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. M. Vajda, L. B. Barber, J. L. Gray, E. M. Lopez, J. D. Woodling, and D. O. Norris, “Reproductive disruption in fish downstream from an estrogenic wastewater effluent,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 3407–3414, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. Y. L. Chen, H. Y. Fu, T. H. Lee et al., “Estrogen degraders and estrogen degradation pathway identified in an activated sludge,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 84, no. 10, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. K. Fujii, S. Kikuchi, M. Satomi, N. Ushio-Sata, and N. Morita, “Degradation of 17beta-estradiol by a gram-negative bacterium isolated from activated sludge in a sewage treatment plant in Tokyo, Japan,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 2057–2060, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. T. Yoshimoto, F. Nagai, J. Fujimoto et al., “Degradation of estrogens by Rhodococcus zopfii and Rhodococcus equi isolates from activated sludge in wastewater treatment plants,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 5283–5289, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. S. Weber, P. Leuschner, P. Kämpfer, W. Dott, and J. Hollender, “Degradation of estradiol and ethinyl estradiol by activated sludge and by a defined mixed culture,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 106–112, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. Fahrbach, J. Kuever, R. Meinke, P. Kampfer, and J. Hollender, “Denitratisoma oestradiolicum gen. nov., sp. nov., a 17β-oestradiol-degrading, denitrifying betaproteobacterium,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 1547–1552, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J. Ke, W. Zhuang, K. Y. H. Gin, M. Reinhard, L. T. Hoon, and J. H. Tay, “Characterization of estrogen-degrading bacteria isolated from an artificial sandy aquifer with ultrafiltered secondary effluent as the medium,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 1163–1171, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. C. P. Yu, H. Roh, and K. H. Chu, “17beta-estradiol-degrading bacteria isolated from activated sludge,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 486–492, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. B. Pauwels, K. Wille, H. Noppe et al., “17alpha-ethinylestradiol cometabolism by bacteria degrading estrone, 17beta-estradiol and estriol,” Biodegradation, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 683–693, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J. S. Sabirova, L. F. F. Cloetens, L. Vanhaecke, I. Forrez, W. Verstraete, and N. Boon, “Manganese-oxidizing bacteria mediate the degradation of 17α-ethinylestradiol,” Microbial Biotechnology, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 507–512, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. Fahrbach, J. Kuever, M. Remesch et al., “Steroidobacter denitrificans gen. nov., sp. nov., a steroidal hormone-degrading gammaproteobacterium,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 58, no. 9, pp. 2215–2223, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. Q. Zeng, Y. Li, G. Gu, J. Zhao, C. Zhang, and J. Luan, “Sorption and biodegradation of 17β-estradiol by acclimated aerobic activated sludge and isolation of the bacterial strain,” Environmental Engineering Science, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 783–790, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. D. O'Grady, S. Evangelista, and V. Yargeau, “Removal of aqueous 17α-ethinylestradiol by Rhodococcus Species,” Environmental Engineering Science, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 1393–1400, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. T. Hashimoto, K. Onda, T. Morita et al., “Contribution of the estrogen-degrading Bacterium novosphingobium sp. strain JEM-1 to estrogen removal in wastewater treatment,” Journal of Environmental Engineering, vol. 136, no. 9, pp. 890–896, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. Muller, D. Patureau, J. J. Godon, J. P. Delgenes, and G. Hernandez-Raquet, “Molecular and kinetic characterization of mixed cultures degrading natural and synthetic estrogens,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 691–701, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. L. Jiang, J. Yang, and J. Chen, “Isolation and characteristics of 17β-estradiol-degrading Bacillus spp. strains from activated sludge,” Biodegradation, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 729–736, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. F. Kurisu, M. Ogura, S. Saitoh, A. Yamazoe, and O. Yagi, “Degradation of natural estrogen and identification of the metabolites produced by soil isolates of Rhodococcus sp. and Sphingomonas sp,” Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, vol. 109, no. 6, pp. 576–582, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. T. Zhang, G. Xiong, and E. Maser, “Characterization of the steroid degrading bacterium S19-1 from the Baltic Sea at Kiel, Germany,” Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 191, no. 1-3, pp. 83–88, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. Y. Sang, G. Xiong, and E. Maser, “Identification of a new steroid degrading bacterial strain H5 from the Baltic Sea and isolation of two estradiol inducible genes,” The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 129, no. 1-2, pp. 22–30, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. C.-P. Yu, R. A. Deeb, and K.-H. Chu, “Microbial degradation of steroidal estrogens,” Chemosphere, vol. 91, no. 9, pp. 1225–1235, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. L. Zhou, Q. Luo, J. Lu, and Q. Huang, “Transformation of 17β-estradiol by Phanerochaete chrysosporium in different culture media,” Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 265–271, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. Q. Yu, P. Wang, D. Liu et al., “Degradation characteristics and metabolic pathway of 17β-estradiol (E2) by Rhodococcus sp. DS201,” Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 804–813, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. S. M. Blunt, M. J. Benotti, M. R. Rosen, B. P. Hedlund, and D. P. Moser, “Reversible Reduction of Estrone to 17β-Estradiol by Rhizobium, Sphingopyxis, and Pseudomonas Isolates from the Las Vegas Wash,” Journal of Environmental Quality, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 281–287, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. L. Fernandez, A. Louvado, V. I. Esteves, N. C. M. Gomes, A. Almeida, and A. Cunha, “Biodegradation of 17β-estradiol by bacteria isolated from deep sea sediments in aerobic and anaerobic media,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 323, Part A, pp. 359–366, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. Z. Kresinova, L. Linhartova, A. Filipova, M. Ezechias, P. Masin, and T. Cajthaml, “Biodegradation of endocrine disruptors in urban wastewater using Pleurotus ostreatus bioreactor,” New Biotechnology, vol. 43, pp. 53–61, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. Y. Wang, X. Zhao, K. Tian et al., “Identification and genome analysis of a novel 17β-estradiol degradation bacterium, Lysinibacillus sphaericus DH-B01,” 3 Biotech, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 166, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. X. Zhao, Y. Wang, X. Xu et al., “Genomics analysis of the steroid estrogen-degrading bacterium Serratia nematodiphila DH-S01,” Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 430–440, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. H. Zhao, K. Tian, Q. Qiu et al., “Genome Analysis of Rhodococcus Sp. DSSKP-R-001: A Highly Effective β-Estradiol-Degrading Bacterium,” International Journal of Genomics, vol. 2018, Article ID 3505428, 11 pages, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. Y. L. Chen, C. P. Yu, T. H. Lee et al., “Biochemical mechanisms and catabolic enzymes involved in bacterial estrogen degradation pathways,” Cell Chemical Biology, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 712–724.e7, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. Q. Qiu, P. Wang, H. Kang, Y. Wang, K. Tian, and H. Huo, “Genomic analysis of a new estrogen-degrading bacterial strain, Acinetobacter sp. DSSKY-A-001,” International Journal of Genomics, vol. 2019, Article ID 2804134, 13 pages, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. X. Ye, H. Wang, J. Kan et al., “A novel 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase in Rhodococcus sp. P14 for transforming 17β-estradiol to estrone,” Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 276, pp. 105–112, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. M. Petrusma, L. Dijkhuizen, and R. van der Geize, “Rhodococcus rhodochrous DSM 43269 3-ketosteroid 9alpha-hydroxylase, a two-component iron-sulfur-containing monooxygenase with subtle steroid substrate specificity,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 75, no. 16, pp. 5300–5307, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. M. Petrusma, G. Hessels, L. Dijkhuizen, and R. van der Geize, “Multiplicity of 3-ketosteroid-9α-hydroxylase enzymes in Rhodococcus rhodochrous DSM43269 for specific degradation of different classes of steroids,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 193, no. 15, pp. 3931–3940, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. Y. Wang, H. Shao, S. Zhu, K. Tian, Q. Qiu, and H. Huo, “Degradation of 17β-estradiol and products by a mixed culture of Rhodococcus equi DSSKP-R-001 and Comamonas testosteroni QYY20150409,” Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 268–277, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. K. Wu, T. H. Lee, Y. L. Chen et al., “Metabolites involved in aerobic degradation of the A and B rings of estrogen,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 85, no. 3, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. B. Langmead and S. L. Salzberg, “Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2,” Nature Methods, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 357–359, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. B. Li and C. N. Dewey, “RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 323, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. W. A. Houry, “Chaperone-assisted protein folding in the cell cytoplasm,” Current Protein & Peptide Science, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 227–244, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. Z. Lin and H. S. Rye, “GroEL-mediated protein folding: making the impossible, possible,” Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 211–239, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. L. Goltermann, L. Good, and T. Bentin, “Chaperonins fight aminoglycoside-induced protein misfolding and promote short-term tolerance in Escherichia coli,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 288, no. 15, pp. 10483–10489, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. L. Goltermann, M. V. Sarusie, and T. Bentin, “Chaperonin GroEL/GroES over-expression promotes aminoglycoside resistance and reduces drug susceptibilities in Escherichia coli following exposure to sublethal aminoglycoside doses,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 6, article 1572, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. X. Ye, H. Wang, J. Kan et al., “A novel 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase in Rhodococcus sp. P14 for transforming 17 β-estradiol to estrone,” Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 276, pp. 105–112, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. S. Genti-Raimondi, M. E. Tolmasky, L. C. Patrito, A. Flury, and L. A. Actis, “Molecular cloning and expression of the beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase gene from Pseudomonas testosteroni,” Gene, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 43–49, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. K. Kristan and T. L. Rizner, “Steroid-transforming enzymes in fungi,” The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 129, no. 1-2, pp. 79–91, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. X. Ye, T. Peng, J. Feng et al., “A novel dehydrogenase 17β-HSDx from Rhodococcus sp. P14 with potential application in bioremediation of steroids contaminated environment,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 362, pp. 170–177, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. R. Van der Geize, K. Yam, T. Heuser et al., “A gene cluster encoding cholesterol catabolism in a soil actinomycete provides insight into Mycobacterium tuberculosis survival in macrophages,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 6, pp. 1947–1952, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. A. Brzostek, T. Sliwinski, A. Rumijowska-Galewicz, M. Korycka-Machala, and J. Dziadek, “Identification and targeted disruption of the gene encoding the main 3-ketosteroid dehydrogenase in Mycobacterium smegmatis,” Microbiology (Reading, England), vol. 151, no. 7, pp. 2393–2402, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. R. K. Dutta, M. K. Roy, and H. D. Singh, “Role of plasmid pJL1 of Arthrobacter oxydans 317 in the degradation of β-sitosterol,” Journal of Basic Microbiology, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 317–324, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. J. Knol, K. Bodewits, G. I. Hessels, L. Dijkhuizen, and R. van der Geize, “3-Keto-5α-steroid Δ1-dehydrogenase from Rhodococcus erythropolis SQ1 and its orthologue in Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv are highly specific enzymes that function in cholesterol catabolism,” The Biochemical Journal, vol. 410, no. 2, pp. 339–346, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. A. Rohman, N. van Oosterwijk, A. M. W. H. Thunnissen, and B. W. Dijkstra, “Crystal structure and site-directed mutagenesis of 3-ketosteroid Δ1-Dehydrogenase from Rhodococcus erythropolis SQ1 explain its catalytic mechanism,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 288, no. 49, pp. 35559–35568, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. B. W. Dijkstra, N. van Oosterwijk, and A. Rohman, “Structure and catalytic mechanism of 3-ketosteroid dehydrogenases,” Procedia Chemistry, vol. 18, pp. 3–11, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. R. van Der Geize, G. I. Hessels, R. van Gerwen, J. W. Vrijbloed, P. van Der Meijden, and L. Dijkhuizen, “Targeted disruption of the kstD gene encoding a 3-ketosteroid delta(1)-dehydrogenase isoenzyme of Rhodococcus erythropolis strain SQ1,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 2029–2036, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. L. F. de las Heras, R. van der Geize, O. Drzyzga, J. Perera, and J. M. N. Llorens, “Molecular characterization of three 3-ketosteroid- Δ1-dehydrogenase isoenzymes of Rhodococcus ruber strain Chol-4,” The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology, vol. 132, no. 3-5, pp. 271–281, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. R. van der Geize, G. I. Hessels, and L. Dijkhuizen, “Molecular and functional characterization of the kstD2 gene of Rhodococcus erythropolis SQ1 encoding a second 3-ketosteroid Δ1-dehydrogenase isoenzyme: The GenBank accession number for the sequence reported in this paper is AY078169,” Microbiology (Reading, England), vol. 148, no. 10, pp. 3285–3292, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. C. Florin, T. Kohler, M. Grandguillot, and P. Plesiat, “Comamonas testosteroni 3-ketosteroid-delta 4(5 alpha)-dehydrogenase: gene and protein characterization,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 178, no. 11, pp. 3322–3330, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. M. Horinouchi, T. Hayashi, T. Yamamoto, and T. Kudo, “A new bacterial steroid degradation gene cluster in Comamonas testosteroni TA441 which consists of aromatic-compound degradation genes for seco-steroids and 3-ketosteroid dehydrogenase genes,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 69, no. 8, pp. 4421–4430, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. M. Horinouchi, T. Kurita, T. Hayashi, and T. Kudo, “Steroid degradation genes in Comamonas testosteroni TA441: isolation of genes encoding a Δ4(5)-isomerase and 3α- and 3β-dehydrogenases and evidence for a 100kb steroid degradation gene hot spot,” The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 122, no. 4, pp. 253–263, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. K. P. Locher, “Review. Structure and mechanism of ATP-binding cassette transporters,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 364, no. 1514, pp. 239–245, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. J. Berdy, “Bioactive microbial metabolites,” The Journal of Antibiotics, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 1–26, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. J. F. Martin, J. Casqueiro, and P. Liras, “Secretion systems for secondary metabolites: how producer cells send out messages of intercellular communication,” Current Opinion in Microbiology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 282–293, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. S. Liu, C. Guo, W. Lin et al., “Comparative transcriptomic evidence for Tween80-enhanced biodegradation of phenanthrene by Sphingomona s sp. GY2B,” The Science of the Total Environment, vol. 609, pp. 1161–1171, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. C. He, Y. Huang, P. Liu et al., “Transcriptome analysis of genes and metabolic pathways associated with nicotine degradation in Aspergillus oryzae 112822,” BMC Genomics, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 86, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. C. Riganti, E. Gazzano, M. Polimeni, E. Aldieri, and D. Ghigo, “The pentose phosphate pathway: an antioxidant defense and a crossroad in tumor cell fate,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 421–436, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. U. Oppermann, C. Filling, M. Hult et al., “Short-chain dehydrogenases/reductases (SDR): the 2002 update,” Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 143-144, pp. 247–253, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. S. W. White, J. Zheng, Y. M. Zhang, and C. O. Rock, “The structural biology of type II fatty acid biosynthesis,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 791–831, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. H. Marrakchi, S. Ducasse, G. Labesse et al., “MabA (FabG1), a Mycobacterium tuberculosis protein involved in the long-chain fatty acid elongation system FAS-II,” Microbiology (Reading, England), vol. 148, no. 4, pp. 951–960, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Kejian Tian et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views382
Downloads354
Citations

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.