Research Article
Material Removal Rate, Electrode Wear Rate, and Surface Roughness Evaluation in Die Sinking EDM with Hollow Tool through Response Surface Methodology
Table 5
The analysis of variance for main and interaction effects of parameters on EWR.
| Source | SS | DOF | MS | value | Prob > | At 95% CI | % contribution |
| Model | 170.14 | 5 | 34.03 | 23.50 | <0.0001 | Significant | | A | 114.76 | 1 | 114.76 | 79.24 | <0.0001 | Significant | 70.39 | B | 2.64 | 1 | 2.64 | 1.83 | 0.2037 | | 3.25 | C | 1.36 | 1 | 1.36 | 0.94 | 0.3531 | | 0.94 | B2 | 11.69 | 1 | 11.69 | 8.07 | 0.0161 | | 0.09 | BC | 39.69 | 1 | 39.69 | 27.40 | 0.0003 | Significant | 0.39 | Lack of fit | 13.19 | 7 | 1.88 | 2.75 | 0.1725 | Nonsignificant | | | 0.9144 | | | | | | | Adjusted | 0.8755 | | | | | | | Predicted | 0.7301 | | | | | | |
|
|
CI: confidence interval; DOF: degrees of freedom; MS: mean sum of squares; SS: sum of squares.
|