Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Microbiology
Volume 2010, Article ID 263410, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/263410
Research Article

Transcriptional Regulation of the rsbV Promoter Controlling Stress Responses to Ethanol, Carbon Limitation, and Phosphorous Limitation in Bacillus subtilis

1Division of Biological Sciences, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0116, USA
2Korea Research Institute of Bioscience & Biotechnology (KRIBB), 52 Oun-Dong, Yusong, Taejon 305-333, South Korea

Received 12 December 2009; Accepted 2 February 2010

Academic Editor: Gregory M. Cook

Copyright © 2010 Soo-Keun Choi and Milton H. Saier Jr.. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The -dependent promoter in front of the rsbV gene of Bacillus subtilis is induced 5-fold in response to (1) the addition of 4% ethanol, (2) carbon starvation, and (3) phosphorous starvation. Binding sites for the global carbon and nitrogen regulators, CcpA and TnrA, were mutated, and the consequences of their loss and that of CcpA or TnrA were studied using rsbV-lacZ fusions. These responses proved to be dependent on CcpA, TnrA, and their putative binding sites upstream of the promoter. Induction in response to glucose limitation was largely abolished by loss of CcpA or the upstream region, while induction in response to phosphorous limitation was largely abolished only by the upstream mutations. The results suggest that CcpA directly influences the carbon starvation response and that both proteins exert indirect effects on all three stress responses. The integrity of the DNA sequence is important for all three responses.

1. Introduction

In Gram-positive bacteria such as species of Bacillus, the complex rsb operon encodes the stress sigma factor, σB, and many of its regulatory proteins [1, 2]. This operon includes two promoters, a σA-dependent promoter in front of the rsbR gene at the beginning of the operon, and a σB-dependent promoter in front of the rsbV gene, the fifth gene in this 8-cistron operon [3]. Much is known about the biochemical mechanism of sigma B control which involves an anti-σB, an anti-anti-σB, and protein phosphorylation [46]. Additionally, induction of the σBpromoter in part mediates adaptation to heat shock, (40–54 ), cold shock (4–12 ), NaCl (10%) shock, ethanol (4–10%) shock, and various starvation (carbon, phosphorous, and nitrogen) stresses [5, 7]. It has been argued that a drop in ATP levels may trigger σB activation [8]. Elements of this regulatory system are found in a wide range of bacteria which in addition to low and high G + C, Gram-positive bacteria include bacteroidetes, cyanobacteria, proteobacteria, and deinococci [2].

We have investigated the dependencies of various stress responses (ethanol stress and limitation for carbon or phosphorous), showing that these responses are dependent on the principal carbon-limitation transcription factor in B. subtilis, CcpA [911], as well as the principal nitrogen regulator TnrA [12]. However, we show that point mutations and deletions in the region upstream of the rsbV promoter, within the rsbU gene, largely abolish all of these stress responses. Because these studies were conducted with an rsbV-lacZ fusion reporter system integrated at the amyE locus, we can conclude that RsbU function is not involved in these effects. Our preliminary results suggest that CcpA and TnrA exert their effects (with the possible exception of carbon starvation) through secondary effects. They further suggest that the DNA conformation upstream of the rsbV promoter plays a critical role in responses of the rsbV promoter to multiple stresses.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strains and Plasmids

Bacterial strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. E. coli DH5α was used as a general cloning host. Transformation of B. subtilis was carried out by a method described elsewhere [13]. Plasmid pDG1661 was obtained from the Bacillus Genetics Stock Center in Ohio. The promoter of rsbV was amplified by PCR using Platinum Pfx DNA polymerase (Invitrogen Corp.) with primers rsbV1 (5 -ataaagcttttctcggcatctcgcaggac-3 ) and rsbV2 (5 -aaaggatcccaagcctgtaatgtcaaaca-3 ), digested with HindIII and BamHI and cloned into the corresponding sites of plasmid pDG1661 to construct pDG-rsbV1. The fragment rsbV3 amplified by PCR with primers rsbV7 (5 -tataagcttgaatgcagaacggaaaacgg-3 ) and rsbV2 was digested with HindIII and BamHI and cloned into the corresponding sites of plasmid pDG1661 to construct pDG-rsbV3. The fragment rsbV5 amplified by PCR with primers rsbV11 (5 -tataagcttcttggagcgtcctgatctgc-3 ) and rsbV2 was digested with HindIII and BamHI and cloned into the corresponding sites of plasmid pDG1661 to construct pDG-rsbV5. The promoter of ctc was amplified by PCR with primers ctc1 (5 -ttgaattctgaatattgtaggtaacatc-3 ) and ctc2 (5 -ttaggatccatttttgccttcgtccctc-3 ), digested with EcoRI and BamHI, and cloned into the corresponding sites of plasmid pDG1661 to construct pDG-ctc.

tab1
Table 1: Bacillus subtilis strains used in this study.
2.2. Site-Directed Mutagenesis

The SalI fragment containing the rsbV promoter, TRE (the TnrA binding site), and CRE (the CcpA binding site) from pDG-rsbV1 were cloned into pUC19 to construct pUC-rsbV1. pUC-rsbV1m1 containing the mutated CRE site in which the central C was changed to A was constructed by site-directed mutagenesis of pUC-rsbV1 using a QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis kit (Stratagene Corp.) with primers rsbV5 (5 - gaatgcagaacggaaaaagctttcttggagcgtcctg-3 ) and rsbV6 (5 -caggacgctccaagaaagctttttccgttctgcattc-3 ). The mutation was confirmed by sequencing. The EcoRI and BamHI fragment of pUC-rsbV1m1 containing the rsbV promoter and the mutated CRE was cloned into pDG1661 to construct pDG-rsbV1m1.

2.3. Growth Conditions and Enzyme Assays

Bacillus cells were grown in LB, glucose limitation medium (GLM), and phosphate limitation medium (PLM) [14]. GLM contains 0.05% glucose and the 0.15 mM of KH2PO4 was used for PLM. But the similar results was obtained from 0.18 mM of KH2PO4. Environmental stress was imposed by adding ethanol to a final concentration of 4% (vol/vol) to cells growing exponentially in LB medium. For the β-galactosidase assay, overnight cultures grown in 1 mL of corresponding medium were diluted 200-fold into fresh medium and grown at 37°C with shaking at 200 rpm. Samples were collected at hourly intervals for the determination of the optical density at 600 nm. β-Galactosidase activity was determined as previously described [15].

3. Results

3.1. Strain Construction

Figure 1 shows the constructs made and the mutations introduced in order to investigate the ethanol stress, carbon limitation, and phosphorous limitation responses of the σB-dependent promoter in the sigB (rsb) operon. The rsb operon has a stress-insensitive σA promoter in front of the rsbR gene, indicated by the first arrow above the operon, and a stress-sensitive σB promoter in front of the rsbV gene, indicated by the second arrow above the operon [3]. Upstreams of the σB promoter and in the rsbU structural gene are two putative transcription factor-binding sites, one specific for TnrA (open arrow) and one specific for CcpA (a so-called catabolite responsive element (CRE) (closed arrow) see Figure 1) [16]. A lacZ fusion was constructed at position 282, well after the σB promoter. The different strains have (1) the wild-type regulatory region (rsbV1), (2) the same with a C A point mutation in the CcpA binding site (rsbV1m1), (3) a deletion lacking the putative TnrA binding site (rsbV3), and (4) a deletion lacking both the TnrA and CcpA binding sites (rsbV5) (Figure 1). Mutation of the conserved C in the CRE is expected to abolish CcpA binding [17].

263410.fig.001
Figure 1: Schematic depiction of the rsb or sigB operon in B. subtilis (top) as well as the constructs made in order to determine the involvement of putative CcpA and TnrA binding sites in control of σB promoter activity in response to various stresses. The octacistronic operon as well as the two promoters, one dependent on σA-RNA polymerase in front of the rsbR gene and one dependent on σB-RNA polymerase in front of the rsbV gene, are shown. The wild-type control region (nucleotides to ) including the putative TnrA binding site (open arrow), the putative CcpA binding site (closed arrow), and the σB promoter was fused to the lacZ gene encoding β-galactosidase as the reporter gene. The wild-type construct is designated by rsbV1. In the second construct, rsbV1m1, the CcpA binding site (CRE) was mutated, changing the central conserved C to an A (see sequence on right-hand side of the construct). In the rsbV3 construct, the control region started at position 238, and the TnrA binding site (TRE) was thereby deleted. In construct rsbV5, the control region started at position 215, and consequently the CRE site as well as the TnrA binding site was thereby deleted. All constructs were inserted in the chromosome at the amyE locus.
3.2. The Ethanol Stress Response

The results of studies on the ethanol stress response with these constructs are presented in Figures 2(a)2(d). Upon addition of 4% ethanol, σB-promoter activity increased about five fold in the wild-type genetic background in agreement with earlier studies [5, 18]. As shown in Figures 2(a) and 2(b), the loss of either CcpA or HprK, both required for catabolite repression in B. subtilis, resulted in a moderate loss of the ethanol activation response. The loss of TnrA or of both TnrA and CcpA resulted in slightly less response than when just the ccpA gene was deleted.

fig2
Figure 2: Effects of various mutations and conditions on the ethanol stress response of the σB-dependent rsbV promoter with cells growing exponentially in LB medium. (a) At time = 0, ethanol was added to a final volume of 4%, giving rise to a 4-5-fold enhancement of promoter activity in the wild-type genetic background (rsbV1) (■). The mutations (Figure 1) decreased the basal as well as the induced activities of the promoter. Wild type (■); ccpA mutant (263410.fig.005); hprK mutant ( ); the rsbV1m1 mutant (); rsbV3 (lacking the TnrA binding site) () rsbV5 (lacking the TnrA and CcpA binding sites) (). (b) Effects of the loss of CcpA (263410.fig.005), TnrA (), or both transcription factors () on the ethanol stress response of the σB-dependent promoter in the rsb operon. (c) Effect of glucose on the ethanol stress response of the rsbV promoter. The experiment was conducted in LB medium with (closed symbols) and without (open symbols) 1% glucose. The wild type (squares) and ccpA mutant (circles) were examined. (d) Response of the σB-dependent ctc gene to ethanol stress. A lacZ fusion was made to the ctc gene, and the response to 4% ethanol was measured in the wild-type background (■), the ccpA mutant background (263410.fig.005), the rsbV1m1 genetic background (), and the rsbV5 genetic background (). The experiment was conducted in LB medium under standard conditions. Ethanol (4%) was added at .

Figure 2(a) shows that the loss of the upstream regulatory region including the TnrA site (rsbV3), the loss of both the TnrA and CcpA binding sites (rsbV5), or the point mutation in the CcpA binding site (rsbV1m1) resulted in a much more substantial loss of activation. The three mutant constructs showed comparable responses. These results show that while CcpA and TnrA may play regulatory roles, a point mutation in the CcpA binding site or modification of the upstream region with loss of the TnrA binding site either alone or together with the CRE has a much more dramatic effect.

We then examined the effect of glucose on the ethanol response (Figure 2(c)), both in the wild-type genetic background (squares) and in the ccpA mutant background (circles). With glucose (closed symbols), the ethanol response was identical to that without glucose (open symbols) within experimental error. We therefore conclude (1) that the DNA sequence in front of the σB promoter is more important to regulation than the presence or absence of CcpA and/or TnrA, and (2) that glucose does not influence the ethanol stress response either with or without CcpA [19]. Since the action of CcpA usually depends on the presence of glucose [20], we suggest that CcpA and TnrA exert indirect effects on the activation of the σB promoter in response to ethanol addition (see Section 4). The fact that even a single nucleotide substitution in the CRE has as dramatic an effect as deletion of the entire region suggests (but does not prove) that the CRE is important for the ethanol stress response even though CcpA and glucose are not. If this suggestion is correct, then a requirement for the presence of the TnrA binding site can also be inferred (see Section 4).

Figure 2(d) shows the effects of various mutations on the ethanol stress response of the σB-dependent ctc gene in B. subtilis. Constructs were made and inserted at the amyE locus as described in “Section 2.’’ The experiment was conducted in LB medium with the addition of 4% ethanol at . The responses observed followed those for the rsb operon. Thus, the ccpA mutation moderately diminished the activity of the ctc promoter, relative to that of the wild type, but the rsbV1m1 and rsbV5 mutations exerted much more drastic effects. On the basis of these results, we suggest that the effects observed on the stress response of rsbV operon expression are transmitted to the ctc gene, and that σB is therefore rate limiting for expression of the ctc gene. These results also confirm the validity of the data presented in Figure 2(a).

3.3. The Carbon Limitation Response

As observed upon the addition of ethanol, glucose limitation causes a substantial increase in expression of the rsbV promoter in a wild-type genetic background (Figure 3). The response to a point mutation or loss of part or most of the upstream region in the rsbU gene was dramatic. The basal activity was diminished only slightly by the point mutation, but starvation induction was largely abolished. The deletion mutations reduced the basal activity more, but in all cases, an inductive response, although much reduced, was still observed (Figure 3(a)).

fig3
Figure 3: Effects of various mutations and conditions on the glucose starvation response of the rsbV promoter. (a) Effects of the rsbV1m1 (), rsbV3 (), and rsbV5 ( ) mutations in the rsbU (upstream) region in front of the rsbV promoter on promoter activity in response to glucose limitation as a function of time. The wild-type response (rsbV1, ■) is shown at the top. (b) The effects of ccpA (263410.fig.005), tnrA (), and ccpA tnrA () double knockout mutants on the glucose starvation response as a function of time. The wild-type response is represented by square symbols (■). (c) Effect of glucose limitation on expression of the ctc gene which is under sigma B (σB) control, in the wild-type (■) or ccpA (263410.fig.005) genetic backgrounds.

Figure 3(b) shows the effects of loss of TnrA, CcpA, or both factors. Loss of TnrA was essentially without effect, but the loss of CcpA ± TnrA resulted in premature induction followed by dramatic repression. When the consequences of the loss of CcpA were determined for the σB-controlled ctc gene (Figure 3(c)), the dramatic induction observed upon glucose starvation was essentially abolished. The relative responses of the rsbV and ctc promoters were comparable.

3.4. The Phosphorous Limitation Response

Phosphorous limitation similarly caused substantial induction of the rsbV promoter (Figure 4(a)). Mutation of the CRE or deletion of part or most of the upstream region greatly reduced this response. The effects of loss of CcpA and/or TnrA proved to be less dramatic with the loss of CcpA having a greater effect than the loss of TnrA (Figure 4(b)). Loss of both reduced expression even further. Correlating with the minimal response to the loss of CcpA on rsbV promoter expression, induction of expression of the ctc gene was not appreciably altered by deletion of the ccpA gene (Figure 4(c)).

fig4
Figure 4: Effects of various mutations and conditions on the phosphorous starvation response. (a) Wild-type response (rsbV1, ■) to phosphate limitation, and the effects of the rsbV1m1 (), rsbV3 (), and rsbV5 ( ) mutations on this response as a function of time. (b) Effects of the loss of CcpA (263410.fig.005), TnrA (), and both transcription factors () as compared with wild type (■) on the phosphate limitation response. (c) Lack of effect of the loss of CcpA (263410.fig.005) on the phosphate limitation response of the ctc gene which is under sigma B (σB) control. The wild-type response is represented by ■.

4. Discussion

At the onset of this project, we discovered binding sites for two transcription factors in front of the stress-responsive rsbV promoter within the rsbU structural gene. The first was a typical binding site for the global nitrogen regulator of B. subtilis, TnrA, while the second one was a typical CRE site which normally binds the global carbon regulator of B. subtilis, CcpA. We introduced a debilitating point mutation in the CRE and deleted either the TnrA binding site or both the TnrA and CcpA binding sites (see Figure 1). Surprisingly, regardless of the type of mutation introduced, changing this upstream region largely abolished the stress responses to (1) ethanol addition, (2) carbon limitation, and (3) phosphorous limitation. In all cases, the responses were reduced to similar degrees, and all three types of mutations had similar, but not identical, effects.

Multiple interpretations are possible for these observations. For example, the CRE and adjacent regions might bind a protein or RNA, and binding might depend on the secondary structure of the upstream DNA. Even subtle changes introduced by a point mutation in the CRE might abolish the activating interactions. Alternatively, the upstream region might inherently control promoter activity in response to stress signals by transmitting a signal through the DNA helix to the promoter. This could affect binding of RNA polymerase or another factor that contributes to the stress responses. Still, another possibility is that the CRE and the TnrA binding sites are important to the stress induction, but they do not function primarily in this regard to respectively bind CcpA and TnrA. Regardless, our experiments clearly indicate that the generalized effects of these upstream changes in the DNA are not mediated by either CcpA and/or TnrA alone.

We believe that these transcription factors, CcpA and TnrA, exert their effects which in general are less dramatic than those of the upstream mutations, through indirect means. For example, the responses to ethanol and phosphorous limitation stresses were only moderately dependent on CcpA and TnrA. Further, although CcpA binding to the DNA is usually dependent on the presence of metabolites generated in the presence of exogenous glucose or another glycolytically metabolized sugar, the presence of glucose exerted no effect on the ethanol stress response (Figure 2(c)). By contrast, carbon starvation induction of the rsbV promoter was dramatically affected by the loss of CcpA although deletion of tnrA was without effect. Since the ccpA mutation affects growth rate and glucose utilization, it is possible that even this dramatic effect of CcpA could be indirect. Regardless, its effect does not appear to be mediated by the CRE identified in the rsbU gene.

The studies reported here clearly indicate the importance of the rsbU region upstream of the rsbV promoter on both basal and induced promoter activities. It is clear, also, that both TnrA and CcpA influence these stress responses. The phenomenology is therefore defined. The detailed molecular mechanisms, providing explanations for the observations reported here, have yet to be determined. The functions of the putative binding sites for TnrA and CcpA in the rsbU gene similarly must be investigated further.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NIH Grant GM55434 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences. The authors are grateful to Susan Fisher for Strain SF416T, and they thank Mary Beth Hiller for assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.

References

  1. M. Hecker and U. Volker, “General stress response of Bacillus subtilis and other bacteria,” Advances in Microbial Physiology, vol. 44, pp. 35–91, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. Pane-Farre, R. J. Lewis, and J. Stulke, “The RsbRST stress module in bacteria: a signalling system that may interact with different output modules,” Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 65–76, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. A. Wise and C. W. Price, “Four additional genes in the sigB operon of Bacillus subtilis that control activity of the general stress factor σB in response to environmental signals,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 177, no. 1, pp. 123–133, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. Akbar, T. A. Gaidenko, C. M. Kang, M. O'Reilly, K. M. Devine, and C. W. Price, “New family of regulators in the environmental signaling pathway which activates the general stress transcription factor σB of Bacillus subtilis,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 183, no. 4, pp. 1329–1338, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. Hoper, U. Volker, and M. Hecker, “Comprehensive characterization of the contribution of individual SigB-dependent general stress genes to stress resistance of Bacillus subtilis,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 187, no. 8, pp. 2810–2826, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. W. van Schaik, M. H. Tempelaars, M. H. Zwietering, W. M. de Vos, and T. Abee, “Analysis of the role of RsbV, RsbW, and RsbY in regulating σB activity in Bacillus cereus,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 187, no. 16, pp. 5846–5851, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. Petersohn, M. Brigulla, S. Haas, J. D. Hoheisel, U. Volker, and M. Heckler, “Global analysis of the general stress response of Bacillus subtilis,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 183, no. 19, pp. 5617–5631, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Zhang and W. G. Haldenwang, “Contributions of ATP, GTP, and redox state to nutritional stress activation of the Bacillus subtilis  σB transcription factor,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 187, no. 22, pp. 7554–7560, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S.-K. Choi and M. H. Saier Jr., “Regulation of sigL expression by the catabolite control protein CcpA involves a roadblock mechanism in Bacillus subtilis: potential connection between carbon and nitrogen metabolism,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 187, no. 19, pp. 6856–6861, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S.-K. Choi and M. H. Saier Jr., “Regulation of pho regulon gene expression by the carbon control protein A, CcpA, in Bacillus subtilis,” Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 40–50, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S.-K. Choi and M. H. Saier Jr., “Mechanism of CcpA-mediated glucose repression of the resABCDE operon of Bacillus subtilis,” Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 11, no. 1-2, pp. 104–110, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. H. Fisher, “Regulation of nitrogen metabolism in Bacillus subtilis: vive la difference!,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 223–232, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. M. Cutting and P. B. van der Horn, “Genetic analysis,” in Molecular Biological Methods for Bacillus, C. R. Harwood and P. B. Cutting, Eds., pp. 24–74, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  14. J. Stulke, R. Hanschke, and M. Hecker, “Temporal activation of β-glucanase synthesis in Bacillus subtilis is mediated by the GTP pool,” Journal of General Microbiology, vol. 139, no. 9, pp. 2041–2045, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. H. Miller, Experiments in Molecular Genetics, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 1972.
  16. Y. Miwa, A. Nakata, A. Ogiwara, M. Yamamoto, and Y. Fujita, “Evaluation and characterization of catabolite-responsive elements (cre) of Bacillus subtilis,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1206–1210, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C. J. Hueck, W. Hillen, and M. H. Saier Jr., “Analysis of a cis-active sequence mediating catabolite repression in Gram-positive bacteria,” Research in Microbiology, vol. 145, no. 7, pp. 503–518, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. T.-J. Kim, T. A. Gaidenko, and C. W. Price, “A multicomponent protein complex mediates environmental stress signaling in Bacillus subtilis,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 341, no. 1, pp. 135–150, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. Chauvaux, I. T. Paulsen, and M. H. Saier Jr., “CcpB, a novel transcription factor implicated in catabolite repression in Bacillus subtilis,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 180, no. 3, pp. 491–497, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. Stulke and W. Hillen, “Regulation of carbon catabolism in Bacillus species,” Annual Review of Microbiology, vol. 54, pp. 849–880, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus