Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Microbiology
Volume 2010 (2010), Article ID 426035, 6 pages
Research Article

Aerosol Infection Model of Tuberculosis in Wistar Rats

AstraZeneca India Pvt. Ltd., Bellary Road, Hebbal, Bangalore 560024, India

Received 13 August 2009; Revised 24 December 2009; Accepted 5 January 2010

Academic Editor: Joseph Falkinham

Copyright © 2010 Sheshagiri Gaonkar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


We explored suitability of a rat tuberculosis aerosol infection model for investigating the pharmacodynamics of new antimycobacterial agents. Infection of rats via the aerosol route led to a reproducible course of M. tuberculosis infection in the lungs. The pulmonary bacterial load increased logarithmically during the first six weeks, thereafter, the infection stabilized for the next 12 weeks. We observed macroscopically visible granulomas in the lungs with demonstrable acid-fast bacilli and associated histopathology. Rifampicin (RIF) at a dose range of 30 to 270 mg/kg exhibited a sharp dose response while isoniazid (INH) at a dose range of 10 to 90 mg/kg and ethambutol (EMB) at 100 to 1000 mg/kg showed shallow dose responses. Pyrazinamide (PZA) had no dose response between 300 and 1000 mg/kg dose range. In a separate time kill study at fixed drug doses (RIF 90 mg/kg, INH 30 mg/kg, EMB 300 mg/kg, and PZA 300 mg/kg) the bactericidal effect of all the four drugs increased with longer duration of treatment from two weeks to four weeks. The observed infection profile and therapeutic outcomes in this rat model suggest that it can be used as an additional, pharmacologically relevant efficacy model to develop novel antitubercular compounds at the interface of discovery and development.

1. Introduction

Tuberculosis remains a leading cause of death worldwide [1] despite unprecedented interest in the scientific community to better understand the pathobiology and development of newer interventional therapies. In this process, animal models of infection have been a corner stone in understanding complex pathology and immunology of tuberculosis. Guinea pigs were the first animal models used to demonstrate tuberculosis disease by Koch in 1882 [2]. Since then, a variety of animal models including mice, rabbits, and nonhuman primates [35] have been investigated to simulate tubercular disease and associated host responses. However, none of the models can mimic the complex pathobiology seen in humans.

The mouse continues to be a preferred species for modeling tuberculosis infection as well as for screening novel anti-TB drug candidates due to practical reasons [6, 7]. Guinea pigs, rabbits, and nonhuman primates are known to be better representatives of late human disease [4, 5] but pose a challenge for drug screening due to large compound requirements and prohibitive costs.

Rats have significantly contributed to modeling of variety of human pulmonary bacterial [8], fungal [9] and viral infections [10, 11] due to an increasing availability of rat immunological reagents. In recent years, several rat strains like Lewis, American cotton rats [12], and diabetic rat strains [13] have been successfully used to develop infection model of tuberculosis, particularly for investigating pathology and immune responses [14, 15]. However, there are no reports on therapy of tuberculosis in rat infection model. Here we report the application of Wistar rat model for approximating tuberculosis infection and the effect of front-line drugs in the containment of this infection.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strain

M. tuberculosis H37Rv ATCC 27294, a strain sensitive to all the standard antimycobacterial agents, was used for all animal infection experiments. Bacterial cultures were prepared as described previously [16].

2.2. Drugs and Reagents

Rifampicin (RIF), Isoniazid (INH), Pyrazinamide (PZA), Ethambutol (EMB), and Carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. USA.

2.3. Animals

The Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC), registered with the Government of India (Reg. no. 5/1999/CPCSEA) approved all animal experimental protocols and usage. Male Wistar rats were purchased from Raj Biotech Pune, India. Rats (7–8 weeks old) were randomly assigned into groups of three per cage and were allowed 2 weeks acclimatisation before experimental use. Feed and water were given ad libitum. Infected rats were maintained in individually ventilated cages (Allentown technologies, USA) in bio containment level 3 facilities.

2.4. Aerosol Infection

Wistar rats were infected via the respiratory route to obtain low-grade bacillary lung infection ( 100 bacilli) using a modified Madison aerosol chamber [16]. Bacterial lung loads were estimated to determine suitable infection conditions for drug efficacy experiments. After infection, the animals were housed for the duration of the study in a bio-safety level 3 facilities. By using microbial enumeration as the dependent variable, the number of animals required per treatment group was as low as three in experiments for drug evaluation. The course of mycobacterial infection was monitored by enumeration of colony forming units (CFU) from excised lungs at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8,13, and 18 weeks postinfection.

2.5. In Vivo Dose-Response Studies

In a separate experiment, starting 4 weeks postinfection, 3 animals per group were administered by oral gavage once daily with a dose range of front-line anti-TB drugs in a 0.25% (w/v) carboxymethyl cellulose suspension formulation. Rifampicin (30–270 mg/kg), Isoniazid (10–90 mg/kg), Pyrazinamide (300–1000 mg/kg), and Ethambutol (100–1000 mg/kg) were administered for two or four weeks. At the onset and 24 h after the completion of treatment, groups of rats were killed by exposure to and the lungs were aseptically removed. Left lung lobe was processed for CFU estimation to monitor drug efficacy while the right lobe was fixed in 10% formaldehyde solution for histopathology. The left lung lobe was homogenized in a final volume of 3 mL by using Teflon-Glass tissue grinders (Wheaton Inc.). Each suspension was serially diluted in 10-fold steps, and at least 3 dilutions were plated onto Middlebrook 7H11 agar supplemented with 10% albumin dextrose catalase (Difco Laboratories) and incubated at C with 5% CO2 for 3 weeks.

2.6. Histopathology

The right lung lobe of each animal was removed for histopathological studies. They were infiltrated with and collected in 10% buffered neutral formalin, followed by standard histopathological processing techniques [15] using different gradation of alcohol. Paraffin embedded tissues were sectioned to 5 m thickness and stained with either Haematoxyline and Eosin stain or Ziehl Neilson staining for acid fact bacilli using quick staining kit (Becton-Dickinson).

2.7. Statistical Analysis

The colony counts obtained from plating were transformed to ( +1), where equals the total number of viable tubercle bacilli calculated to be present in a given sample. Prism software version 4 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, California) was used for all the calculations.

3. Results

3.1. Course of M. tuberculosis Infection in Rat Lung

The focus of initial experiments was to establish an optimum inoculum size required to consistently achieve low bacterial numbers (100–300 CFU) in the lungs. M. tuberculosis inocula of three different bacterial strengths (104 CFU m ), CFU m and 108 CFU mL-1) were aerosolised in a 25 mL volume using a Collison Nebulizer (BGI Incorporated, Waltham, MA) for a fixed duration, and the course of infection was monitored till four weeks. All three inocula lead to installation of bacilli into the lungs in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 1). An inoculum of 106 CFU mL-1 consistently delivered bacilli/lung and was considered optimum for further experiments. The course of infection following an initial load of 108 CFU mL-1 was steep, while that following 104 CFU mL-1 yielded inconsistent infection across animals. Thus these two inocula were not preferred for further experiments. The course of tuberculosis infection increased logarithmically up to the first 6 weeks. The growth rate declined thereafter and the net bacterial load in the lungs increased by merely 1 CFU over the next 12-week period (Figure 2).

Figure 1: Standardisation of M. tuberculosis aerosol infection in Wistar rats: initial bacillary load and course of infection observed over a period of 4 weeks, following challenge with three different infection inocula.
Figure 2: Course of infection of M. tuberculosis H37Rv in Rat lungs following low-grade aerosol infection. (): Course of infection and CFU obtained during weeks 1–7 in study 1. (■): Course of infection and CFU obtained over weeks 2–18 in study 2. Drug treatment started at week 4 postinfection. Inset shows a rat lung at thirteen-week post infection with multiple macroscopic nodular granulomas all the lung lobes following aerosol infection with M. tuberculosis.
3.2. Gross and Histopathology Findings

Grossly the rats developed circumscribed granuloma of varying sizes (pinpoint to 3 mm in diameter) distributed over the lung surface by 6 weeks and gradually increased to 5 mm and showed raised appearance (Figure 2 inset). Histopathological examination of the granuloma at various intervals during the course of infection revealed strong association between bacillary loads and pathology. Microscopically, for the first two weeks there were no histopathological changes in the lungs except for mild inflammatory response in the blood vessel. By week 2, there was mononuclear cell infiltration in alveolar spaces distributed sparsely in lower inoculum (  CFU  ) and extensively in higher inoculum groups (  CFU mL-1 and 108 CFU mL-1). By 4 weeks, granulomatous lesions were seen in lungs across all groups (Figure 5), although the number of such foci varied depending on the initial inoculum. The predominant cell types were macrophages/histiocytes and foam cells. Lymphocytic aggregation was predominant while few epitheloid cells and multinucleated histiocytes were seen occasionally. Some degenerating neutrophils were also seen. There was no central zone of necrosis and peripheral fibrosis. The general architecture of granuloma resembled that seen in mice.

3.3. Bactericidal Activity of Drugs

The dose response of four frontline TB drugs was determined in the rat infection model over a wide concentration range administered once daily per-orally for 2 weeks. RIF exhibited most potent and a sharp dose-dependent bactericidal activity among all drugs tested (Figure 3). RIF 30, 90, and 270 mg/kg doses resulted in 1.5, 2.1, and 2.7- CFU reductions, respectively, in the lungs following two weeks of treatment. INH was the second most efficacious drug with 0.4, 1.2, and 1.3- CFU reductions, respectively, at 10, 30, and 90 mg/kg doses. EMB was less efficacious than RIF and INH but exhibited a clear dose response. The net bactericidal effect of EMB 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg was 0.1, 0.2 and 0.9- CFU reductions, respectively. In contrast, PZA had activity of 0.6 and 0.7- CFU reductions at 300 and 1000 mg/kg doses.

Figure 3: Dose response of front-line TB drugs in rats following two-week treatment. CFU counts/left lung lobe plotted against a range of drug regimens. Rifampicin (30, 90 and 270 mg/kg), Isoniazid (10, 30, and 90 mg/kg), Ethambutol (100, 300, and 1000 mg/kg) and Pyrazinamide (300 and 1000 mg/kg) were dosed per oral once daily for two weeks (12 doses). Each bar represents the mean CFU counts from three animals.

In a second experiment, we compared the effect of RIF 90 mg/kg, INH 30 mg/kg, EMB 300 mg/kg, and PZA 300 mg/kg administered per-orally once daily either for 2 weeks or 4 weeks. The effect was reproducible across the two experiments (Table 1); RIF, EMB, and PZA exhibited significantly higher bactericidal activity when the duration of treatment was increased from 2 to 4 weeks, while INH did not (Figure 4).

Table 1: Reproducibility of infection and response to treatment across 2 independent experiments. Each data point represents the mean SD data from three animals per group.
Figure 4: Time course of effect of front-line TB drugs on rat lung infection (RIF-90 mg/kg; INH-30 mg/kg; EMB 300 mg/kg and PZA 300 mg/kg). Drug treatment was given per oral once daily for 2- and 4-week periods.
Figure 5: H&E at 100 magnification (a) and ZN stain at 1000 magnification (b) of a lung granulomatous lesion at 4 weeks post infection.

4. Discussion

Animal models are an integral part of drug discovery programs. They allow understanding of disease process and evaluation of new interventions in a dynamic system thus providing a link between in vitro potency and therapeutic use.

Traditionally, mice have been the model of choice for early preclinical testing of drug candidates for antitubercular activity because of their relative ease in handling, lower maintenance costs, and need for small amounts of experimental drugs to study pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics [6, 7, 17]. In contrast, rats have been considered unsuitable for experimental tuberculosis since they were noted to be resistant to tubercle bacilli. Neither high doses of tubercle bacilli given parenterally could kill nor produce necrotic tuberculous lesions and tuberculin sensitivity.

The pathology observed in mice following M. tuberculosis infection does not entirely reflect the human disease. In contrast, larger animals like guinea pigs, rabbits, and nonhuman primates better approximate human tuberculosis [1821]. However, the obvious limitation for drug screening remains the larger size, logistics and drug quantity requirements. In recent years, evidence is available where tuberculosis infected rats have necrotic lesions and chronic infections in the lungs [13, 14, 22], that are closer to the events observed in human disease than in the mice model. Thus, rats may provide an intermediate option in terms of representing more histopathological aspects of human disease than mice, yet not posing significantly higher demands on logistics and drug substance.

We report a Wistar rat aerosol infection model of tuberculosis suitable for investigating the pharmacodynamics of antitubercular drugs. Three key reasons that prompted us to explore a rat infection model are as follows.

(1)Rats are widely accepted species for investigating pharmacokinetics and toxicokinetics at the preclinical and development stages of drug discovery programs [15].(2)In recent years, there are many reports on rat M. tuberculosis infection models for investigating immunology and pathology of tuberculosis [1215, 19]. A report indeed showed that granulomas in M. tuberculosis infected American cotton rats [12] exhibit caseous central necrosis similar to humans thereby adding additional value to the animal model. (3)We reasoned that if the response of M. tuberculosis infected rats to antitubercular therapy is reproducibly established then the entire PK, PD, and toxicological investigations at the interface of discovery and development can be done in the same species.

We have reproducibly achieved chronic rat lung infections similar to that reported in American Cotton rats [12] and Lewis rats [14]. In our study, infected rats appeared healthy during the 18 weeks of observation. Aerosol infection allowed us to mimic portal of entry as in humans, resulting in inflammatory disease leading to pulmonary granulomas. The biphasic nature of infection may provide an opportunity to study drug effects on actively replicating bacilli (week 1–6) or on minimally replicating bacilli (week 7–18).

The histopathological changes observed in Wistar rats over a period of 18 weeks had no central necrosis similar to mice [7] and other rat strains like type 1 diabetic rats [13] and Lewis rats [14]. In contrast, American cotton rats [12] and F344/N-rnu nude rats [22] have been shown to exhibit central necrosis within granulomas suggesting variable immunological and pathological outcomes across different rat strains.

Our study established efficacy of four front-line TB drugs (RIF, INH, PZA, and EMB) in the Wistar rat infection model. Significant bactericidal activities of four reference drugs acting on distinct molecular targets undoubtedly suggest suitability of rat infection model for screening of compounds with antitubercular activity. Thus, Wistar rat model offers a significant advantage over the mouse model since it presents histopathological changes that are closer to that observed in human tuberculosis, while simultaneously permitting the study of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety pharmacology in the same species. This would provide a better handle in terms of predicting the human dose with the appropriate safety margins.


The authors sincerely acknowledge Parvinder Kaur for preparing M. tuberculosis cultures used for all animal infections and Vasan Sambandamurthy for reviewing this manuscript. The fisrt and the second authors contributed equally to this manuscript.


  1. WHO, “Global tuberculosis control. Surveillance, planning and financing,” Tech. Rep. WHO/HTM/TB/208.383, WHO, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  2. R. Koch, “Aetiologie der tuberculose,” Berliner Klinische Wochenschrift, vol. 19, pp. 221–230, 1882. View at Google Scholar
  3. U. D. Gupta and V. M. Katoch, “Animal models of tuberculosis,” Tuberculosis, vol. 85, pp. 277–293, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  4. A. M. Dannenberg Jr. and F. M. Collins, “Progressive pulmonary tuberculosis is not due to increasing numbers of viable bacilli in rabbits, mice and guinea pigs but is due to a continuous host response to mycobacterial products,” Tuberculosis, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 229–242, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  5. J. L. Flynn, S. V. Capuano, D. Croix et al., “Non-human primates: a model for tuberculosis research,” Tuberculosis, vol. 83, no. 1–3, pp. 116–118, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. B. P. Kelly, S. K. Furney, M. T. Jessen, and I. M. Orme, “Low-dose aerosol infection model for testing drugs for efficacy against Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 2809–2812, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. Apt and I. Kramnik, “Man and mouse TB: contradictions and solutions,” Tuberculosis, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 195–198, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  8. J. Gavaldà, J. A. Capdevila, B. Almirante et al., “Treatment of experimental pneumonia due to penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in immunocompetent rats,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 795–801, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. Goldman, S. C. Lee, and A. Casadevall, “Pathogenesis of pulmonary Cryptococcus neoformans infection in the rat,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 4755–4761, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  10. G. A. Prince, R. L. Horswood, E. Camargo, D. Koenig, and R. M. Chanock, “Mechanisms of immunity to respiratory syncytial virus in cotton rats,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 81–87, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. G. Ottolini, J. C. G. Blanco, M. C. Eichelberger et al., “The cotton rat provides a useful small-animal model for the study of influenza virus pathogenesis,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 86, no. 10, pp. 2823–2830, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  12. R. L. Elwood, S. Wilson, J. C. G. Blanco et al., “The American cotton rat: a novel model for pulmonary tuberculosis,” Tuberculosis, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 145–154, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  13. I. Sugawara and S. Mizuno, “Higher susceptibility of Type 1 diabetic rats to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection,” Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 216, no. 4, pp. 363–370, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. I. Sugawara, H. Yamada, and S. Mizuno, “Pathological and immunological profiles of rat tuberculosis,” International Journal of Experimental Pathology, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 125–134, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  15. R. J. Basaraba, “Experimental tuberculosis: the role of comparative pathology in the discovery of improved tuberculosis treatment strategies,” Tuberculosis, vol. 88, supplement 1, pp. S35–S47, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  16. J. Ramesh, S. Gaonkar, P. Kaur et al., “Pharmackokinetics-Pharmacodynamics of rifampicin in aerosol infection model of tuberculosis,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 47, pp. 2118–2124, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  17. A. J. M. Lenaerts, V. Gruppo, J. V. Brooks, and I. M. Orme, “Rapid in vivo screening of experimental drugs for tuberculosis using gamma interferon gene-disrupted mice,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 783–785, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. W. Smit, V. Balasubramanian, and E. Wiegeshaus, “A guinea pig model of experimental airborne tuberculosis for evaluation of the response to chemotherapy: the effect on bacilli in the initial phase of treatment,” Tubercle, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 223–231, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. R. J. Basaraba, E. E. Smith, C. A. Shanley, and I. M. Orme, “Pulmonary lymphatics are primary sites of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in guinea pigs infected by aerosol,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 74, no. 9, pp. 5397–5401, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  20. D. N. McMurray, “Disease model: pulmonary tuberculosis,” Trends in Molecular Medicine, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 135–137, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. D. N. McMurray, “A non-human primate model for pre-clinical testing of new tuberculosis vaccines,” Clinical Infectious Disease, vol. 30, supplement 3, pp. S210–S212, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  22. I. Sugawara, H. Yamada, and S. Mizuno, “Nude rat (F344/N-rnu) tuberculosis,” Cellular Microbiology, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 661–667, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus