International Journal of Microbiology

International Journal of Microbiology / 2012 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 468539 |

María S. Barbagelata, Lucía P. Alvarez, Cristian M. Dotto, Santiago M. Lattar, Daniel O. Sordelli, Fernanda R. Buzzola, "Aromatic Compound-Dependent Staphylococcus aureus Is Safe in a Nasal Colonization Leukopenic Murine Model", International Journal of Microbiology, vol. 2012, Article ID 468539, 7 pages, 2012.

Aromatic Compound-Dependent Staphylococcus aureus Is Safe in a Nasal Colonization Leukopenic Murine Model

Academic Editor: Todd R. Callaway
Received20 Mar 2012
Revised28 Jun 2012
Accepted28 Jun 2012
Published05 Aug 2012


Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage is a risk factor for individuals suffering from trauma, surgical procedures, invasive devices, and/or decreased immunity. Recently, we demonstrated that artificial nasal colonization with an attenuated S. aureus mutant reduced by bacterial interference with the colonization of pathogenic strains of S. aureus. This could be an optional tool to diminish the rate of S. aureus infections in hospitalized patients. The aim of this study was to construct a safe ΔaroA mutant of S. aureus and to discriminate it from nasal colonizing and osteomyelitis S. aureus isolates by SmaI pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) typing. The ΔaroA mutant, named RD17, exhibited an LD50 (3.2 × 106 colony-forming unit (CFU)) significantly higher than that of the parental strain (2.2 × 103 CFU). The colony number of the RD17 mutants recovered from nares of leukopenic mice was similar to that observed in the animals of the control group. Therefore, the ΔaroA mutant was demonstrated to be safe due to maintaining low growth levels in the nares regardless of immune status of the animals. PFGE typing allowed the unequivocal identification of the S. aureus and differentiation of aroA mutants in nasal colonizing and osteomyelitis isolates. This information could be important to discriminate endogenous infections from laboratory strains of S. aureus.

1. Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus is part of the human microbiota and remains one of the most important community and nosocomial-acquired pathogens, with high rates of hospital-associated infections [1]. Although multiple body sites can be colonized, the anterior nares of the nose is the most common site of colonization [2]. Its prevalence in a healthy human population is around 30% [3]. Carriers of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) have a higher risk of infection than those colonized by methicillin-sensitive (MSSA) strains [4, 5]. It has been demonstrated that most MRSA infections following initial colonization or infection are caused by identical strains [6].

Bloodstream infections are an important cause of morbidity and mortality during immunosuppressive conditions (diabetes mellitus, liver diseases, renal failure, corticotherapy, haemodialysis treatment, etc.), particularly for S. aureus nasal carriers [7, 8]. This susceptibility appears to be directly related to the severity and length of leukopenia [9]. Leukocytes, mainly neutrophils, are the main source of proinflammatory mediators and are essential for resistance to bacterial infections [10, 11].

Using a murine model of nasal colonization we demonstrated, recently, that an auxotrophic S. aureus mutant (named NK41) was able to interfere with the colonization of MRSA isolates belonging to Cordobes and Pediatric clones [12]. The auxotrophy of S. aureus NK41 mutant was achieved by insertion of a kanamycin resistance ( ) gene into the aroA gene, which encodes the enzyme 5-enolpyruvylshikimate 3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS). The EPSPS is part of the metabolic pathway of aromatic amino acids; therefore, bacteria with mutations in the initial steps of this metabolic pathway are auxotrophic to aromatic amino acids [13]. Herein, we constructed a ΔaroA mutant of S. aureus, and its safety was determined by nasal colonization of leukopenic mice. We also differentiated the ΔaroA (RD17) and aroA:: (NK41) mutants from nasal colonizing and osteomyelitis S. aureus isolates by pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) pattern. This additional knowledge is important to develop alternative strategies for the prevention of staphylococcal diseases.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strain and Growth Conditions

Bacterial reference strains and plasmids and S. aureus attenuated mutants used in the present study are described in Table 1. Sixty-two single S. aureus isolates were obtained from 258 nasal swabs as a standard prophylactic procedure in patients at the time of admission to two hospitals of Buenos Aires City during the period 2009-2010. Also individual S. aureus isolates were obtained from 97 patients with osteomyelitis from seven hospitals in Argentina (four in Buenos Aires City, two in Buenos Aires Province, and one in the City of Santa Fe). Isolation and identification of S. aureus were performed according to routine culture procedures used in the Clinical Bacteriology laboratory [14]. Subcultures of single colonies of homogeneous size and pigmentation from primary isolation on blood agar plates (Britania, Buenos Aires, Argentina) were frozen in brain heart infusion (BHI) (Britania) broth with 20% glycerol (Promega, Madison, USA) at −20°C until further use. Species identification was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of S. aureus-specific sequences according to Martineau et al. [15]. S. aureus isolates were tested for susceptibility to methicillin (oxacillin 1 μg) (Britania) using the agar diffusion method according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommendations [16] and confirmed by PCR of mecA gene as performed by Fey et al. [17]. Escherichia coli strains were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium (Britania) supplemented with ampicillin (Amp) (50 or 100 μg/mL) (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, USA), isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) (0.5 mM) (Promega), and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (X-Gal) (20 mg/mL) (Promega) as needed for maintenance of plasmids. For selection of chromosomal markers or maintenance of plasmids, S. aureus antibiotic concentrations were the following: chloramphenicol (Cm) 10 μg/mL (Sigma Chemical Co.), erythromycin (Em) 5 μg/mL (Sigma Chemical Co.), and X-Gal, 40 mg/mL. For phenotype characterization assays, colonies were replicated onto defined minimum medium (DMM) agar plates for S. aureus as described by Pattee and Neveln [18]. Briefly, DMM agar plates were supplemented with the aromatic amino acids tryptophan (Trp) (0.05 mM), phenylalanine (Phe) (0.24 mM), and tyrosine (Tyr) (0.28 mM), as well as the precursors p-aminobenzoic acid (PABA) (0.05 mg/L) and 2,3-dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHB) (10 mg/L). All reactives utilized to prepare the DMM agar plates were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. An aro mutant proliferates only in minimal medium supplemented with the three aromatic amino acids and PABA and DHB.

Strain or plasmidCommentSource

RN4220Mutant strain of Staph. aureus 8325-4 that accepts foreign DNA
RN6390 laboratory strain related to 8325-4, maintains haemolytic pattern when propagated on sheep
NewmanS. aureus polysaccharide capsular serotype 5 (CP5)
NK41Newman aroA::KaR
RD17; RD89RN6390 ΔaroA This study
DH5αE. coli host cloning vectorsInvitrogen
pMADE. coliS.aureus (Listeria) shuttle vector with the bgaB gene encoding a β-galactosidase. AmpR/EmR
pMAD-DELpMAD plasmid containing the mutant allele for deletion of the aroA geneThis study
pGEM-T EasyAmpR, , f1 ori, MCS, Mob, cloning T vectorPromega
pALC1743pSK236 ( with agr P3 promoter)

2.2. Generation of Deletion aroA Mutant

To obtain S. aureus ΔaroA mutant, four primers were designed (Table 2) that amplified two fragments of 625 and 980 bp that flanked the sequences of the aroA gene to the left (primers Aro-A and Aro-B) and the right (primers Aro-C and Aro-D), respectively. Primer Aro-C has a 16-base complementary region with primer Aro-B to allow the products of the first PCR anneal. A second PCR was performed with primers Aro-A and Aro-D to obtain a single fragment using the first PCR products as template. Then, 1 μL of each of the first PCR products was mixed with 10 pmol of the outside primers and amplified by PCR. The fusion product (~1.6 kb) was purified and cloned in the pGEM-T Easy Vector (Promega). The plasmid was digested with BamHI and SalI (Promega) to purify the cloned fragment, and, finally, the fragment was fused by ligation into the shuttle plasmid pMAD (to yield pMAD-DEL). Blue and AmpR colonies were selected on LB plates complemented with Amp and X-Gal. Plasmids were obtained from the selected transformants to verify by PCR the loss of the 650 bp fragment from the aroA gene yielding a 1.6 kb deletion fragment. This construction was named pMAD-DEL. The resulting plasmid was electropored into RN4220 S. aureus to generate transformants. Electrocompetent RN6390 was subsequently transformed with pMAD-DEL isolated from RN4220. pMAD contains a temperature-sensitive origin of replication and an Em resistance gene in gram-positive strains [19]. Homologous recombination experiments were performed as previously described [20]. RN6390 S. aureus strains with the desired fragment of PCR product were replicated onto DMM agar plates [18] supplemented or not with Trp, Phe, Tyr, PABA, and DHB to check the aromatic amino acid auxotrophic phenotype.



aEnzyme restriction sites are underlined; TCTAGA: XbaI, GTCGAC: SalI, GGATCC: BamHI.
2.3. Complementation

A 1.4 kb fragment encompassing the aroA gene from S. aureus RN6390 was amplified by PCR using primers Fw-aroComp and Rv-aroComp (Table 2). The PCR fragment was restricted and ligated into vector pALC1743 (kindly provided by A. L. Cheung) after deletion of the gfp gene and then transformed into E. coli DH5α (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) [21]. Restriction analysis and DNA sequencing confirmed the orientation and authenticity of the cloned gene. The recombinant plasmid was electroporated into the ΔaroA RN6390 S. aureus mutant (RD17), and Cm-resistant colonies were selected. Transformants were tested for restoration of the wild-type phenotype.

2.4. Determination of the Bacterial Virulence in Mice

CF-1 outbred mice were bred and maintained in the vivarium of the Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires in accordance with the guidelines set forth by the US National Institutes of Health [22]. For 50% lethal dose (LD50) studies, 6-week-old male CF-1 mice were injected intraperitoneally with 0.5 mL of a suspension ranging from 101 to 109 CFU of bacterial strain and 2% (w/v) Brewer’s yeast (Sigma Chemical Co.) in BHI broth [23]. Three groups, each comprising 10 mice, from three separate tests received serial log dilutions of each bacterial strain. The estimation of the LD50 was made after 7 days using a software for probit analysis (PASW 18, IBM Software, Inc.) [24].

2.5. Nasal Colonization in Leukopenic Murine Model

CF-1 female mice weighing 27 to 32 g were used for the experiments. Mice were rendered leukopenic by injecting cyclophosphamide (Sigma Chemical Co.) (200 mg/kg/day) on days 4 and 2 before challenge. Previous studies have shown that this regimen produces leukopenia in this model for 5 days [25]. At time 0, groups of 10–15 mice were challenged by the intranasal route with 10 μL of suspension containing approximately 107 CFU of the RD17 (∆aroA mutant) or Sa14 (MRSA isolate). To evaluate nares colonization, mice were CO2-euthanized 24 hours after bacterial challenge and cultures were made from their nasal tissues. The area around the nasal region was wiped with 70% ethanol, and the nose was excised and homogenized in 400 mL tryptic soy broth (TSB) (Britania) using a tissue grinder. The lungs also were excised and homogenized separately in 2 mL of sterile distilled water. Tenfold serial dilutions of the tissue homogenates and blood samples were plated onto tryptic soy agar (TSA) (Britania) plates. Animals not treated with cyclophosphamide, but challenged under the conditions as the leukopenic mice, were used for control.

2.6. Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE) Typing

The clonality of the S. aureus clinical and nasal isolates, the S. aureus reference strains, and their derived attenuated mutants was assessed by PFGE of SmaI-digested (Promega) chromosomal DNA fragments [27] using a CHEF-DR II apparatus (BioRad Laboratories, CA, USA) as previously described [28]. Reference strains representative of the prevalent MRSA clones in Buenos Aires (Cordobes, Pediatric, and Brazilian, resp.), were included [26]. The similarity between PFGE types was evaluated by the Dice coefficient. The resultant similarity matrix was analyzed by the unweighted pair group method using arithmetic averages (UPGMA), and data were analyzed with the TREECON software for Windows [29].

2.7. Statistical Analysis

In order to obtain a statistical assessment of virulence for mice of the S. aureus RN6390 and RD17 mutants, the 7-day survival ratios from three separate tests were pooled for estimation of the LD50 by a computrrized program for probit analysis (PASW 18, IBM Software, Inc.). Nonparametrical data was analyzed with the Mann-Whitney test using the GraphPad Prism version 4.00 software for Windows. values lower than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Characterization of RN6390 ΔaroA Mutant

After the analysis of 950 colonies, only 2 named RD17 and RD89 presented the loss of a 648 bp fragment between the 659 and 2201 sites of the aroA gene yielding a 1.6 kb PCR product. Then, in order to characterize the auxotrophic phenotype, the isolated mutants were replicated onto DMM agar plates for S. aureus [18] with or without aromatic amino acids Trp, Phe, Tyr and its precursors PABA and DHB. The bacteria that failed to grow after 20 hours of incubation on DMM plates without addition of the three aromatic amino acids and PABA and DHB were considered Aro-deficient. Therefore, the deletion of the aroA gene encoding the EPSPS led to an aroA auxotrophy of the RD17 and RD89 mutants. Because the RD17 and RD89 mutants exhibited the same phenotype and genotype, subsequent experiments were performed only on RD17. Complementation assay restored the wild-type phenotype of the RD17 mutant. The growth rates of the ΔaroA mutant and its parental strain RN6390 were similar in TSB medium (data not shown). In addition, RD17 mutant exhibited a very stable phenotype, since its reversion frequency performed as described previously was <1 × 10−12 [13].

To determine the attenuation of RD17 mutant in mice, the probit analysis comparing the LD50 with the ΔaroA mutant and its parental strain was performed. The LD50 of the parental RN6390 strain (2.2 × 103 CFU ±95% CI: 2.6 × 101–8.5 × 103 CFU) was statistically significant ( ) different from the LD50 of the RD17 mutant (3.2 × 106 CFU ±95% CI: 1.6 × 106−9.7 × 106 CFU). This statistical increase in the LD50 of the RD17 mutant confirmed its attenuation in mice.

3.2. Nasal Colonization in Leukopenic Murine Model

The safety of the ΔaroA mutant was evaluated using leukopenic mice model. To render the nasal colonization, the RD17 mutant and an epidemiologically unrelated MRSA nasal isolate (Sa14) were administrated into the nose of leukopenic groups of mice as we described previously [12]. CF-1 mice were treated with cyclophosphamide to render them leukopenic. Mice receiving cyclophosphamide had significantly lower white blood cells counts (331 ± 185 cells/mL) than mice receiving the saline control (3044 ± 501 cells/mL) ( ). The number of Sa14 (MRSA) colonies recovered from the noses of leukopenic mice group was significant higher than that observed in the control group (Figure 1(a)); in contrast, the number of RD17 mutant colonies recovered was similar between the groups (Figure 1(b)). No bacteria was recovered from blood or lungs of neither the groups of mice (data not shown). Therefore, the RD17 mutant maintained low growth levels in the nose regardless of immune status of the animals.

3.3. Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE) Typing

All S. aureus osteomyelitis and nasal colonizing isolates ( ), the obtained mutants (RD17 and NK41), and their parental strains (RN6390 and Newman) were discriminated into 40 fingerprint groups by PFGE typing (Figure 2). A dendrogram that included all patterns was constructed on the basis of the levels of similarity, and a cut-off point of 80% was considered to define the groups. SmaI PFGE band analysis revealed the presence of six major pulsotypes (named 1, 4, 5, 10, 28, and 40) that included 86 isolates. The remainders were evenly distributed in 33 groups of one to five isolates and one group with 9 isolates. All mutants and their parental wild-type strains exhibited a markedly different macrorestriction genotype when compared with those of nasal colonizing and osteomyelitis isolates (Figure 2). The number of genetic differences of the RD17 and NK41 mutant genomes (RN6390 and Newman background, resp.), compared with those S. aureus isolates was three or more, which made them clonally different according to the criteria set by Tenover et al. [27]. These results show that RD17 and NK41 mutants could be discriminated from osteomyelitis and nasal colonizing S. aureus isolates using SmaI macrorestriction PFGE typing.

4. Discussion

The disruption of the aroA gene that encodes for EPSPS enzyme leads to an auxotrophy in S. aureus for DHB, PABA, and aromatic amino acids. The inhibition of EPSPS results in shikimate accumulation, inhibition of synthesis of aromatic amino acids and secondary metabolites causing cell death [30]. We constructed previously S. aureus aroA mutants by transposon mutagenesis with Tn917 (FB306) and by insertion of the gene into the aroA gene by allelic replacement mutagenesis (NK41). Both mutants were tested in two in vivo infection models with different purposes [12, 13]. Recently, we demonstrated that the NK41 mutant interfered with the nasal colonization of clinical isolates of S. aureus representative of prevalent clones in Argentina. It is important to note that the FB306 and NK41 mutants have inserted in their genome an antibiotic resistance gene allowing their easy selection and in vitro identification. However, this feature is a disadvantage for its potential use in vertebrate. For this reason we constructed a ΔaroA mutant of S. aureus RN6390 strain by allelic exchange. The obtained mutant (RD17) failed to show any measurable reversion and remained attenuated in vivo.

In the present study, the nasal colonization of leukopenic mice represented a risk state for disseminated infections by S. aureus. In this model we observed that the MRSA Sa14 isolate multiplied in noses more easily due to decreased host defenses and this increase was statistical significance with respect to the control group ( ). In contrast, leukopenic animals challenged with the attenuated mutant RD17 showed similar levels of nasal colonization as the control animals group; therefore, the RD17 mutant was safe under the conditions studied. Indeed, the RD17 mutant maintained the low growth levels in the nose regardless of the immune status of animals.

On the other hand, it was of interest to differentiate laboratory strains and their mutants (RD17 and NK41) from S. aureus isolated from patients with osteomyelitis and nasal carriers. This information will be required for future studies. We performed SmaI PFGE typing because it is still the most discriminative of the available genotypic methods for S. aureus [31]. The analysis indicated that the RD17 and NK41 mutants were unequivocally discriminated from nasal colonizing and osteomyelitis S. aureus isolates under investigation. Moreover, both aroA mutants showed pulsotypes totally different to those observed for S. aureus representative of Brazilian, Cordobes, and Pediatric clones. A major concern to use an attenuated live mutant in vivo is the possibility that new cases of the disease may be caused by the revertant strain. The deletion of aroA gene described in this paper showed the stability of the RD17 mutant in mice and its inability to cause disseminated infections in leukopenic nasal colonized mice. Therefore, the spreading of spontaneous derivative RD17 mutants would be an unlikely event to occur.

In the last years emergence of mupirocin resistance among MRSA and MSSA isolates has been reported [3236]. This is a worrying situation in addition to the emergence of multiresistant S. aureus strains [3739]. Based on our results we postulate that aroA mutant of S. aureus could be utilized as an alternative strategy to reduce the staphylococcal nasal carriage.


This work was supported in part by grants from ANPCyT (PICT 06/00991 and PICT 10/0733) and Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBACYT 061), Buenos Aires, Argentina. The authors thank Ambrose L. Cheung (Darmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire) for providing plasmid pALC1743 and Michel Débarbouillé (Institut Pasteur, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris) for providing plasmid pMAD. The authors wish to acknowledge the excellent technical assistance of Lorena Medina. They also thank the anonymous reviewers whose comments helped them to improve their manuscript.


  1. F. R. DeLeo and H. F. Chambers, “Reemergence of antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the genomics era,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 119, no. 9, pp. 2464–2474, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. F. D. Lowy, “Medical progress: Staphylococcus aureus infections,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 339, no. 8, pp. 520–532, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. A. van Belkum, D. C. Melles, J. Nouwen et al., “Co-evolutionary aspects of human colonisation and infection by Staphylococcus aureus,” Infection, Genetics and Evolution, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 32–47, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. C. Carbon, “Costs of treating infections caused by methicillin-resistant staphylococci and vancomycin-resistant enterococci,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 44, pp. 31–36, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. S. S. Huang and R. Platt, “Risk of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection after previous infection or colonization,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 281–285, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. S. Huang, D. J. Diekema, D. K. Warren et al., “Strain-relatedness of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates recovered from patients with repeated infection,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 1241–1247, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. G. R. Donowitz, D. G. Maki, C. J. Crnich, P. G. Pappas, and K. V. Rolston, “Infections in the neutropenic patient–new views of an old problem,” American Society of Hematology, pp. 113–139, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  8. V. G. Fowler, J. M. Miro, B. Hoen et al., “Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis: a consequence of medical progress,” JAMA, vol. 293, no. 24, pp. 3012–3021, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. P. A. Pizzo, “Fever in immunocompromised patients,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 341, no. 12, pp. 893–900, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. L. A. J. O'Neill, “Toll-like receptor signal transduction and the tailoring of innate immunity: a role for Mal?” Trends in Immunology, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 296–300, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. P. Scapini, J. A. Lapinet-Vera, S. Gasperini, F. Calzetti, F. Bazzoni, and M. A. Cassatella, “The neutrophil as a cellular source of chemokines,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 177, pp. 195–203, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  12. M. S. Barbagelata, L. Alvarez, M. Gordiola et al., “Auxotrophic mutant of Staphylococcus aureus interferes with nasal colonization by the wild type,” Microbes and Infection, vol. 13, no. 12-13, pp. 1081–1090, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. F. R. Buzzola, M. S. Barbagelata, R. L. Caccuri, and D. O. Sordelli, “Attenuation and persistence of and ability to induce protective immunity to a Staphylococcus aureusaroA mutant in mice,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 3498–3506, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. T. L. Bannerman, Staphylococcus, Micrococcus, and Other Catalase-Positive Cocci That Grow Aerobically, ASM Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2003.
  15. F. Martineau, F. J. Picard, P. H. Roy, M. Ouellette, and M. G. Bergeron, “Species-specific and ubiquitous-DNA-based assays for rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 618–623, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  16. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests; Approved Standard, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2006.
  17. P. D. Fey, B. Saïd-Salim, M. E. Rupp et al., “Comparative molecular analysis of community- or hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 196–203, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. P. A. Pattee and D. S. Neveln, “Transformation analysis of three linkage groups in Staphylococcus aureus,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 201–211, 1975. View at: Google Scholar
  19. M. Arnaud, A. Chastanet, and M. Débarbouillé, “New vector for efficient allelic replacement in naturally nontransformable, low-GC-content, gram-positive bacteria,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 70, no. 11, pp. 6887–6891, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. J. Valle, A. Toledo-Arana, C. Berasain et al., “SarA and not σB is essential for biofilm development by Staphylococcus aureus,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 1075–1087, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. B. C. Kahl, M. Goulian, W. Van Wamel et al., “Staphylococcus aureus RN6390 replicates and induces apoptosis in a pulmonary epithelial cell line,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 68, no. 9, pp. 5385–5392, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. National, Research, and Council, in Book Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH guide, revised), National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA, 1996.
  23. J. M. Mei, F. Nourbakhsh, C. W. Ford, and D. W. Holden, “Identification of Staphylococcus auerus virulence genes in a murine model of bacteraemia using signature-tagged mutagenesis,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 399–407, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  24. D. Finney, Probit Analysis, Cambrige University Press, London, UK, 1971.
  25. W. A. Craig, J. Redington, and S. C. Ebert, “Pharmacodynamics of amikacin in vitro and in mouse thigh and lung infections,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 27, pp. 29–40, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  26. S. M. Lattar, L. P. N. Tuchscherr, D. Centrón et al., “Molecular fingerprinting of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from patients with osteomyelitis in Argentina and clonal distribution of the cap5(8) genes and of other selected virulence genes,” European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. In press. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. F. C. Tenover, R. Arbeit, G. Archer et al., “Comparison of traditional and molecular methods of typing isolates of Staphylococcus aureus,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 407–415, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  28. L. S. Quelle, A. Corso, M. Galas, and D. O. Sordelli, “STAR gene restriction profile analysis in epidemiological typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: description of the new method and comparison with other polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods,” Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 455–464, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. Y. Van De Peer and R. De Wachter, “Treecon for windows: a software package for the construction and drawing of evolutionary trees for the microsoft windows environment,” Bioinformatics, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 569–570, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. F. J. L. Aragão and A. C. M. Brasileiro, “Positive, negative and marker-free strategies for transgenic plant selection,” Brasilian Journal of Plant Physiology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  31. A. Strandén, R. Frei, and A. F. Widmer, “Molecular typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: can PCR replace pulsed-field gel electrophoresis?” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 3181–3186, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. E. S. Walker, J. E. Vasquez, R. Dula, H. Bullock, and F. A. Sarubbi, “Mupirocin-resistant, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: does mupirocin remain effective?” Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 342–346, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. A. E. Simor, T. L. Stuart, L. Louie et al., “Mupirocin-resistant, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains in Canadian Hospitals,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 3880–3886, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. J. E. Vasquez, E. S. Walker, B. W. Franzus, B. K. Overbay, D. R. Reagan, and F. A. Sarubbi, “The epidemiology of mupirocin resistance among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at a Veterans' Affairs hospital,” Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 459–464, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  35. J. C. Jones, T. J. Rogers, P. Brookmeyer et al., “Mupirocin resistance in patients colonized with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a surgical intensive care unit,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 541–547, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. B. D. Cookson, “The emergence of mupirocin resistance: a challenge to infection control and antibiotic prescribing practice,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 11–18, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. S. A. Boers, I. Van Ess, S. M. Euser, R. Jansen, F. R. H. Tempelman, and B. M. W. Diederen, “An outbreak of a Multiresistant Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MR-MSSA) strain in a Burn Centre: the importance of routine molecular typing,” Burns, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 808–813, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. E. Nannini, B. E. Murray, and C. A. Arias, “Resistance or decreased susceptibility to glycopeptides, daptomycin, and linezolid in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus,” Current Opinion in Pharmacology, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 516–521, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. C. Sola, R. O. Lamberghini, M. Ciarlantini et al., “Heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate susceptibility in a community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus epidemic clone, in a case of Infective Endocarditis in Argentina,” Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, vol. 10, article 15, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2012 María S. Barbagelata et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.