Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Microbiology
Volume 2017, Article ID 2439025, 11 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2439025
Research Article

High Doses of Halotolerant Gut-Indigenous Lactobacillus plantarum Reduce Cultivable Lactobacilli in Newborn Calves without Increasing Its Species Abundance

1Division of Gastroenterology and Liver Disease, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
2Digestive Health Research Institute, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
3Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1
4Department of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1

Correspondence should be addressed to Alexander Rodriguez-Palacios; ude.esac@305rxa

Received 6 February 2017; Accepted 6 April 2017; Published 17 May 2017

Academic Editor: Giuseppe Comi

Copyright © 2017 Alexander Rodriguez-Palacios et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

To elucidate the ecological effect of high oral doses of halotolerant (resistant to table salt) indigenous-gut bacteria on other commensals early in life, we conducted a culture-based study to quantify the effect of intestinal Lactobacillus plantarum strain of bovine origin (with remarkable aerobic growth capabilities and inhibitory activity against Escherichia coli O157:H7 and F5) on clinical health and gut lactobacilli/coliforms in newborn calves. In a double-blind placebo-randomized trial twelve colostrum-fed calves, consecutively born at a farm, were fed L. plantarum within 12 hours from birth at low ( CFU/day) or high concentrations () or placebo (q24 h, 5 d; 10 d follow-up). We developed a 2.5% NaCl-selective culture strategy to facilitate the enumeration of L. plantarum-strain-B80, and tested 384 samples (>1,152 cultures). L. plantarum-B80-like colonies were detected in a large proportion of calves (58%) even before their first 24 hours of life indicating endemic presence of the strain in the farm. In contrast to studies where human-derived Lactobacillus LGG or rhamnosus had notoriously high, but short-lived, colonization, we found that L. plantarum colonized stably with fecal shedding of  log10·g−1 (irrespective of dose, ). High doses significantly reduced other fecal lactic acid bacteria (e.g., lactobacilli, ) and slightly reduced body weight gain in calves after treatment. For the first time, a halotolerant strain of L. plantarum with inhibitory activity against a human pathogen has the ability to inhibit other lactobacilli in vivo without changing its species abundance, causing transintestinal translocation, or inducing clinical disease. The future selection of probiotics based on halotolerance may expand therapeutic product applicability.

1. Introduction

Probiotics are widely available in the market and high doses are anecdotally recommended. However, for most probiotics, the actual dose-dependent effect on intestinal health and other gut bacteria remains largely uncertain, especially with regard to gut-indigenous strains. Although there is no consensus on what “high-dose” means for a microbial fed product, the World Health Organization and the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations define probiotics as “live microorganisms which when administered in adequate amounts confer a ‘health benefit’ on the host” [1]. Such definition emphasizes the relevance of the nonspecified high “amount” because beneficial outcomes in earlier studies were elicited only when “high doses” of probiotic bacteria were used [2].

Sequence-based methods for evaluating the gut 16s rDNA microbiome have shown great promise and have become increasingly common in digestive diseases research [3]. However, they do not recapitulate community composition of simple culture-based mock communities [4]. The great variability recognized in 16s rDNA microbiome studies is primarily introduced by variability relevant to the target gene and region sequences, sequencing platform, with less impact by the method of DNA extraction [47]. Further, 16s rDNA microbiome analysis cannot distinguish between dead and alive bacteria and has suboptimal sensitivity, that is, limit of high throughput sequencing detection of low abundant bacteria to identify and quantify microorganisms at the strain level [8].

To elucidate the ecological effect of high oral doses of specific gut-indigenous bacterial strains on other commensals early in life, here we conducted a preliminary culture-based study to quantify the effect of an aerobic (aerotolerant anaerobe with remarkably optimal growth at room air) gut-indigenous Lactobacillus plantarum strain (which we previously isolated from calves with the most potent inhibitory activity against Escherichia coli O157:H7 and F5 and ability to survive acidic conditions and high bile salt concentrations; see [9]) on the clinical health and gut lactobacilli and coliform populations in the feces and intestinal mucosa of newborn bottle-fed calves, given the clinical relevance of mucosa-associated microbiota [10].

To contribute to the understanding of the role of lactic acid bacteria (LAB, i.e., Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium Enterococcus and Pediococcus spp.) in animal health and food safety, we previously characterized >100 LAB isolates from cattle and found from a potentially therapeutic perspective two types of extreme profiles: one inhibitory of pathogenic Escherichia coli and one stimulatory [9]. Ten percent of the LAB isolates significantly inhibited E. coli strains responsible for serious diseases in calves and humans (types F5 and O157:H7), while another 10% of isolates promoted (>2-fold) their growth in vitro [9, 11]. Among the inhibitory strains, a calf-derived strain of L. plantarum (isolate B80, herein “Lplant-B80”) had optimal properties to be suitable for preclinical dose-dependent studies in animals. The strain had excellent aerobic growth and acid resistance and its colony was morphologically distinct and was frequently isolated from the small intestinal mucosa of calves [9]. Because E. coli O157:H7 is a serious foodborne human pathogen widely present in the cattle industry [11], it is important to identify mechanisms to prevent colonization and supershedding in animals, especially if therapeutic/preventive mechanisms could be administered with the diet.

Among natural inhabitants of plants, L. plantarum is the most promising organism for commercial therapeutic microbiology in humans because they have strong immune modulatory properties [12] and could be added to plant-based diets. To contribute to the understanding of dose-effect responses of gut-indigenous bacteria in animals, the objective of this blind placebo-controlled randomized trial was to determine the safety and quantitative effect of low- and high doses of gut-derived L. plantarum Lplant-B80 on other intestinal LAB and coliforms when given orally to newborn colostrum-fed healthy calves.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals and Husbandry

Healthy neonatal Holstein Friesian male calves (12–24 hours old, fed > 4 L of fresh colostrum within 6 h of birth) were included in this preclinical study under the approval of the Animal Care Committee of the University of Guelph. The study was conducted in winter and used animals that originated from the same experimental farm this L. plantarum strain was originally isolated from [9]. To prevent clustering and increase study heterogeneity, animals were consecutively enrolled as they were born (the first two born of the week; 1-2/week). Available animals were randomly assigned to three groups upon arrival to the research facility (preassigned ballots “in a hat” strategy), before the study commenced (placebo and low- and high-dose of Lplant-B80), which resulted in three random uneven cohorts (, 5, and 4). No further animals were available from the same farm for this preclinical trial. Calves were kept in individual pens. Hay and water (ad libitum), and the bedding (wood shavings), were daily replaced to minimize fecal-oral recycling of microorganisms.

2.2. Inoculum

Lplant-B80 was fed to the animals (body weight average per group: placebo, 44.0, high-dose, 44.8, and low-dose, 45.2 kg, ) as freeze-dried pellets containing or  CFU (low- and high-dose) per day, following a triple blinded approach at pellet assignment, follow-up, and statistical analysis. Placebo pellets were prepared with 0.5 g of freeze-dried lactose-free powder milk to resemble the Lplant-B80 pellets. All pellets were administered dissolved in fresh whole milk derived from in-house milking Holstein cows () that had not received antibiotics for >60 days, once a day in the morning for 5 days. Animals were monitored for additional 10 days. For proper body weight gain analysis, the milk volume fed daily corresponded to 10% of the animal body weight in kilograms, divided into two feedings (q12h). BSL2-practices were implemented to prevent cross-contamination and infections with infectious pathogens of neonatal calves. Feeding bottles were washed, disinfected for 10 minutes with 10% aqueous sodium hypochlorite, and rinsed with sterile water within 30 minutes of use.

2.3. Preparation of Lactobacillus plantarum Pellets for Blinded Trial

To prepare Lplant-B80 freeze-dried pellets, 50 mL of de Man, Rogosa, and Sharp (MRS) broth (Oxoid) was inoculated with 24-hour colonies of Lplant-B80 and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours which was inoculated onto 1-L MRS broth. Bacteria were harvested after 24 h by centrifugation (4400 ×g, 15 minutes, 4°C) and washed 1x with phosphate buffered saline. For freeze-drying, 6% dextran and 0.9% of NaCl solution (Gentran 70®) was used to resuspend bacteria (1 : 1 w/v). The suspensions (aliquoted as 2.5 mL in 4-mL glass test tubes) were frozen at −80°C for 24 h prior to freeze-drying at −50°C. The resulting freeze-dried pellets were stored sealed in the tubes with a rubber cap at −80°C and used within 3 weeks of preparation. The concentration of live Lplant-B80 was verified in random pellets. Culture of leftover milk from feeding bottle confirmed viability at ingestion. A set of sealed tubes containing the pellets were left at room temperature (23°C; 70% humidity) and monitored for bacterial viability at 6, 12, and 48 months.

2.4. Follow-Up and Samples

Daily physical examinations were performed to all animals by a specialist in internal medicine. Body weight was determined prior to feeding on days 1 and 2 to monitor neonatal health and hydration status and on days 6 and 15 to assess weight gain. Rectal temperature, appetite, and attitude were assessed daily. Fresh fecal samples were collected by digital palpation, directly from the rectum before and after inoculation on days 1–3, 5–7, 9, 11, 13, and 15 (). Animals were euthanized on day 15 to determine persistent bacterial systemic translocation by collecting gastrointestinal mucosal specimens (rumen ventral-caudal sac, pylorus, ileum, cecal apex, small colon, and ileocecal lymph node) for enumeration of L. plantarum, total LAB, and fecal coliforms, as the importance of mucosal associated microbiota is increasingly relevant in our understanding of intestinal inflammation [1315]. All samples were stored at −80°C and processed together at the end of the feeding trial.

2.5. Total Anaerobic Lactic Acid Bacteria and Aerobic Coliforms

Immediately after collection, feces were homogenized, weighted, and aliquoted (5–10 g) for storage and freeze-drying. To adjust for the variable water content of feces in neonatal animals, all bacterial enumeration analyses were adjusted to dry matter and normalized to CFU·gr−1 of dry feces. The water content was determined via freeze-drying of 2 fecal aliquots per sampling day. Enumeration of fecal LAB and coliforms was conducted with the spread-plate method and 10-fold serial dilutions. MRS agar was used for enumeration of LAB (anaerobic, 48 h, 37°C) and MacConkey agar for coliforms (aerobic, 24 h, 37°C).

2.6. Isolation Protocol for Recovery of Lplant-B80

We previously reported that Lplant-B80 grows in MRS broth adjusted with hydrochloric acid to pH 4 and that it was aerobically able to grow on NaCl-MRS agar [9]. Here we combined those two strong properties to optimize the isolation and differentiation of Lplant-B80-like colonies from other LAB in fecal/intestinal samples. Compared to a rifampicin-resistant subclone we prepared for this study (twenty 24 h-incubation passages with increasing antibiotic concentrations), testing indicated there was no need for selective antibiotics. Optimization experiments with HCl and NaCl were conducted with feces spiked with Lplant-B80. The limit of detection from experimentally inoculated feces was  CFU/g. We also verified the consistent selective ability of this method during coculture with 20 other random LAB isolates that represent the spectrum of the LAB collection that was previously derived from the same farm and temporal frame [9]. Lplant-B80 colonies were distinct from other LAB (i.e., yellowish, 4-5 mm round flat colonies, Gram-positive short rods) after aerobic incubation on 2.5% NaCl-MRS agar at 37°C for 3–5 days.

2.7. Quantitative and Qualitative Detection of Lplant-B80

For quantitation (CFU estimation) in feces, tenfold serial dilutions were prepared using pH4-MRS broth, aerobically incubated at 37°C for 2 h (optimal time without affecting Lplant-B80 CFUs in validation experiments), and spread plated (100 μL) for aerobic incubation onto 2.5%-NaCl-MRS agar at 37°C for three days. For qualitative enrichment (presence/absence) of Lplant-B80, the inoculated pH4-MRS broths were incubated for additional 24 h; then, 10 μL of the broth was streaked onto 2.5%-NaCl-MRS agar.

For tissues, the detection of Lplant-B80 in mucosal surfaces was based on qualitative triplicate analysis (presence/absence) using broth. In brief, after removing the intestinal content by gently pressure-flushing the surface with PBS via a 50-mL syringe/18 G needle, mucosa was aseptically dissected for aerobic enrichment in 5 mL of pH4-MRS broth as described for feces. Lymph nodes were cultured after cutting longitudinally 1-2 mm slices, 0.5 cm apart. Every sample batch had three autoclaved intestinal specimens concurrently tested as negative controls. Lplant-B80-like colonies were enumerated after 5 days of aerobic incubation, purified by subculture on 2.5%-NaCl-MRS agar, tested biochemically, and a subset confirmed with Sanger sequencing of 16S rRNA gene analysis.

2.8. Rapid Miniaturized Biochemical Code for Preliminary Confirmation

For validation of the isolation protocol and rapid preliminary confirmation of Lplant-B80-like colonies during this preclinical trial, bacterial biochemical profiles were performed on random Lplant-B80-like isolates and other recovered LAB using the 4-hour incubation miniaturized BBL Crystal Anaerobic ID System (Becton Dickinson; 245010), which has 29 possible enzymatic test well reactions and reported overall reproducibility of 99.1% (96.2–100%) [16]. The resulting pattern of 29 reactions is converted into a ten-digit profile number that is used as the basis for identification stored in a BBL database, using a comparative approach and percentage of similarity/probability with respect to best hits. This system is designed to identify over 110 species of clinically relevant anaerobes, including the lactobacilli L. acidophilus, L. casei, L. catenaforme, L. fermentum, L. jensenii, L. johnsonii, and L. rhamnosus [16]. In this study isolates with non-Lplant-B80-like morphology or gram stain, or yielding unexpected BBL profiles, were further tested (15% of all isolates) using API 50CH miniaturize biochemical testing (bioMerieux) to further qualify the phenotypic profile probability and 16S rRNA sequencing for species level confirmation as the preferred molecular method [17, 18].

2.9. 16s rRNA Phylogenetic Analysis

Partial sequencing of 16S rRNA gene was conducted on selected isolates using primers (BSF8/20-F, AGA GTT TGA TCC TGG CTC AG; BSR534/18-R, ATT ACC GCG GCT GCT GGC) to amplify variable regions V1–V3 (500 bp) [19] following principles for LAB [20]. Assembled sequences were compared to the sequence of the orally administered isolate Lplant-B80, previously characterized [9]. 16s rRNA gene sequences were Blastn in NCBI datasets. A neighbour-joining method with a bootstrap consensus tree inferred from 500 replicates was created using MEGA5 [21]. Evolutionary distances were computed using the p-distance method and using 1st, 2nd, and 3rd codon and noncoding position, with ambiguous positions removed for each sequence pair [21].

2.10. Statistical Analysis

One-way ANOVA of the areas under the curves with multiple -test comparisons for significant -values was used to analyze the effect of treatments on fecal water content and the CFU number. Two-way ANOVA for repeated measures was used to identify treatment and day effect along with appropriate multiple means comparisons if -value was significant. The effect of treatments on the recovery of Lplant-B80 was analyzed comparing the overall means of the log10 CFU and the average days of positive cultures per group. SAS Software was used (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC) (SAS, 1996). Nonparametric methods were used when assumptions were not fulfilled as described [22, 23]. Chi-square was used to compare proportions.

3. Results

3.1. Viability of Lplant-B80 during Storage on Freeze-Dried Pellets

Bacterial counts on frozen Lplant-B80 pellets confirmed the intended doses at administration, and culture of pellets stored at room temperature for several months showed that the CFU declined at a rate of about 1-2 log10 units after 6–12 months of storage. After 48 months, a high-dose pellet tested had 10 CFU per 100 mg of pellet. This simultaneous and prospective analysis shows that L. plantarum survive preparation and storage.

3.2. Oral Administration Yielded No Clinical Signs of Disease

Oral administration of L. plantarum strain Lplant-B80 to calves resulted in no clinical signs of intestinal or systemic disease. Although watery feces (and diarrhea) are commonly observed in neonatal calves, no differences were observed for the cumulative numbers of days with loose stools during the study, or the fecal water content across the three treatment groups after the discontinuation of Lplant-B80 (6–15 d, ANOVA, ). Body weight gain was similar across groups during the administration of Lplant-B80; however, it trended towards being lower in animals after receiving the high dose (follow-up period, 6–15 days, M-W, ; Figure 1).

Figure 1: Body weight gain in neonatal calves during and after oral supplementation with L. plantarum strain B80. (a) Cumulative percentage of body weight gain. (b) Daily body weight gain efficiency. Data normalized to body weight at the beginning of each period. Distinct scripts (A, B) above the boxplots indicate pairwise difference (M-W, ).
3.3. Rapid Biochemical Profile for Preliminary Confirmation of Lplant-B80

After testing 114 pure single Lplant-B80-like bacterial isolates, from feces and freeze-dried Lplant-B80 pellets, two unique rapid (4 hour) biochemical BBL profiles were identified and used for preliminary biochemical confirmation of the fed Lplant-B80 strain. Referent 24 h colonies of L. plantarum isolated from pellets fed to the calves (incubated in both plain and 2.5% NaCl-MRS agar, Figures 2(a) and 2(b)) yielded the BBL-ID code 011066-3-062 characterized by positive reactions for L-methionine, L-phenylalanine, L-leucine, L-alanine, L-isoleucine, p-n-p-β-D-galactoside, p-n-p-β-D-glucoside, p-n-p-α-D-glucoside, p-n-p-N-acetyl-glucosaminide, 4MU-β-D-cellobiopyranoside, furanose, and pyranose. Compared to L. acidophilus reference strain ATCC-314, our freshly grown L. plantarum isolates were negative on L-lysine, L-arginine, L-histidine, L-serine, and p-n-p-α-D-galactoside. Because identification of Lplant-B80 was facilitated by inspecting colonies after 3–5 days of incubation on the 2.5% NaCl-MRS agar, BBL testing of such aged colonies was also conducted. Of interest, the yielded BBL profile was slightly different (011046-3-000); therefore, testing of candidate colonies was always conducted with fresh 24 h subcultures of Lplant-B80 suspect isolates. Further testing of 15% of Lplant-B80 suspect isolates with API CH and 16s RNA analysis confirmed the recovery of Lplant-B80 isolates throughout the length of study and aided in identifying the distinctive colony morphology for Lplant-B80 isolates in the culture agar (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)).

Figure 2: Selective microbial enumeration and colonization of L. plantarum Lplant-B80 following oral administration of low- and high doses in neonatal calves. (a) The use of optical density for quantification of bacterial growth in broth allowed the identification of optimal acid and salt concentrations to favor the optimal growth of as few as 102 CFU of Lplant-B80 in an acid/salt-MRS broth, under aerobic conditions, preventing the growth of most previously tested LAB in our laboratory; see [9]. (b) Large distinct colonies for Lplant-B80 on MRS-salt agar, from a fraction of freeze-dried pellet stored for 48 months at room temperature and rehydrated with PBS. (c) Binary analysis of fecal colonization with L. plantarum Lplant-B80 before, during, and after administration. 1, recovered; 0, not recovered. Note similar overall recovery rate (histograms) across groups and high recovery during treatment period.
3.4. Recovery of Lplant-B80 from Feces and Intestinal Mucosa

This study involved the microbiological analysis of 120 fecal samples and 72 intestinal mucosal/lymphatic tissues, using direct and enrichment culture methods here developed, to enable the recovery of Lplant-B80-like isolates and test the effect of its administration on coliform and lactobacilli counts ( samples tested in >1,152 agar plates). Using direct selective plating and the BBL/morphological criteria, L. plantarum resembling Lplant-B80 was recovered from two of the 12 newborn calves prior to the administration of Lplant-B80 in animals at <24 h of age and from 27% (30 samples) from fecal samples in the placebo group at older ages (up to 15 days old). Lplant-B80-like bacteria were recovered in 35% of samples from Lplant-B80 treated animals. Using enrichment broth enabled a 2-fold increased recovery rate of Lplant-B80 in all groups (up to 47–50%; Figure 2(c)). Lplant-B80-like was most common in treated animals during the administration period; however, the amount of CFU of L. plantarum resembling Lplant-B80 in positive samples was unexpectedly similar across groups and over time ( log10/g, ANOVA, ; Figure 3(a)). In adjusted regression analysis, there was a slight nonsignificant inhibitory effect on coliforms in the high-dose group (Figure 3(b)). For total lactic acid bacteria, high oral doses of Lplant-B80 significantly reduced fecal LAB until the end of the study (compared to placebo and low-dose, ANOVA, areas under the curve, and 0.01; Figure 3(b)).

Figure 3: Quantitative effect of L. plantarum (Lplant-B80) administration on other fecal cultivable microbiota. (a) Selective enumeration of L. plantarum B80 based on phenotype and BBL biochemical profile. Data for the first 6 days of treatment and the follow-up period (7–15 days). Average ± SD. (b) Total fecal coliforms and lactic acid bacteria. High doses tended to lower fecal coliforms, but it significantly reduced lactic acid bacteria (areas under the curves, ). Distinct capitalized superscripts (A, B) denote statistical differences.

Lactobacillus plantarum Lplant-B80 (based on colony morphology and 100% similarity on BBL profile) was confirmed using single-colony PCR and Sanger sequencing of the 16s rRNA gene. Phylogenomic analysis of 16s rRNA gene data for various isolates in Figure 4 illustrates that Lplant-B80 was recovered from the intestinal mucosa in three animals: two from the ileum of low- and high-dose calves and one from the cecum of a high-dose calf, suggesting that this L. plantarum (Lplant-B80-like) strain is likely endemic at the farm and well adapted to the intestinal tract of neonatal calves. No other tissues yielded Lplant-B80. Overall, the strain used was uncommonly found in association with the mucosal surface (4.2%, 3 of 72 intestinal and lymph tissues) compared to its common presence in feces (50%, Chi-square, ). Other pH-resistant LAB that grew aerobically on 2.5%-NaCl-MRS agar from feces with the selective protocol included Pediococcus acidilactici, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus hiriae, and L. salivarius. The other LAB identified from intestinal mucosa in the selective medium were L. pentosus, L. acidophilus, and L. salivarius (Figure 4); however, none of them have the large yellowish discoloured colonies deemed characteristic of Lplant-B80 in the agar used in the present study (Figure 2(b)).

Figure 4: Neighbour-joining of 16S rRNA gene sequences of LAB from calves in this study. Numbers indicate percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test. Branch lengths are evolutionary distances, that is, units of the number of base differences per site. A total of 1614 positions were the final dataset. LAB isolates from this study (●) and internal laboratory references (▲). Remarkably the closest isolates in the NCBI collection are a group of isolates isolated from grass silage in Japan.

4. Discussion

Despite decades of observation that probiotics need to be given in high doses to exert positive health effects [24], little is known regarding the dose response effect of host-indigenous lactobacilli in intestinal health. Here we assessed the safety and dose-dependent colonization properties and inhibitory effect of calf-derived L. plantarum strain B80 in immune-competent colostrum-fed neonatal calves, using culture as the gold standard test for the colonization of this cultivable organism in this time series repeated experimental analysis. In this context, after designing a selective protocol based on NaCl (limit of detection, 103 Lplant-B80 in inoculated feces) and rapid miniaturized biochemistry, we discovered (i) that L. plantarum has a high natural occurrence in neonatal newborn calves (50% prevalence), (ii) that this Lplant-B80 strain has a presumptive natural persistence in the farm, since naturally occurring isolates resembled original strains isolated a year earlier from the ilea of calves [9], (iii) that at high doses administration is experimentally safe in calves with proper passive transfer of maternal immunity, and (iv) that the high doses decreased the abundance of total cultivable lactobacilli from the feces of calves, without decreasing total commensal coliform counts, despite reported inhibitory effects on pathogenic E. coli F5 and O157:H7 [9].

The lack of evidence for intestinal translocation to regional mesenteric lymph nodes indicates that L. plantarum strain B80 is contained within the intestinal tract of healthy calves. These experimental observations combined with the excellent aerobic growth and halotolerant nature of this microorganism (able to thrive at 2.5% NaCl) are assets that support recently illustrated biotechnological advantages of Halobacteria to be used as potential feed supplements, especially since L. plantarum species are known to thrive in plants and plant-derived fermented diets [25].

Lactobacillus administration has reduced faecal Enterobacteriaceae and anaerobic cocci in calves [26, 27]; however, earlier reports were limited to often describing the effect of primarily L. acidophilus or lactobacilli mixtures with minimal information on other cultivable fecal LAB [28], or coliform inhibition only observable when using whole-milk diets [29]. Our study documents the inhibitory effect that high doses of an indigenous Lactobacillus species had on other intestinal LAB. In contrast to human-derived L. rhamnosus and animal-derived L. pentosus studied in other animal species [30, 31], where higher fecal counts (“peak of colonization”) are observed during the oral administration (supplementation) period, the magnitude of shedding of this L. plantarum strain remained constant throughout our study suggesting that there was no intestinal overgrowth of Lplant-B80 during the study.

Despite the observed stable shedding of Lplant-B80, high doses resulted in the significant reduction of other intestinal LAB. These results seem paradoxical for L. plantarum since others have reported other lactobacilli changes in total intestinal LAB counts in the feces of calves [28, 32]. Of great interest, more recently, the administration of L. plantarum strain WCFS1 (resistant to preculture with NaCl) to yoghurt during production also resulted in the inhibition of other lactobacilli, specifically L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus [33], for which the authors could not attribute a specific cause. The reduction of other LAB with high doses of Lplant-B80 in our culture-based study is unlikely to be due to ecological exclusion by competition or displacement alone secondary to overgrowth of Lplant-B80 because its shedding was similar across treatment groups, although local exclusion is possible [34]. More likely is the inhibitory effect via the production of plantaricins (bacteriocins, i.e., antimicrobial peptide targeted against Gram-positive bacteria, including lactobacilli, and Gram-negative bacteria like Salmonella spp. and E. coli) [35, 36], but that remains a hypothesis that needs to be further tested in vivo. Increasingly there is evidence that immune-mediated modulation could occur in association with specific pathogens and cytokines or receptors via modulation of immune cells or the dose-dependent presence of cell wall components. Metabolic regulatory mechanisms with the gut microbiota are also possible [37, 38]. Modulation of LAB via community composition changes is under investigation using metagenomics.

Lactobacillus plantarum strains are increasingly promising as potential probiotics as aerotolerant strains that could be included as additives in pelletized or fermented feeding [33, 39]. The promising role of probiotics for modulation of animal intestinal health, control of zoonotic pathogens, and body gain efficiency requires deeper understanding of the effect of probiotics on other LAB. Although this study might indicate that the administration of this bacterium could result in a statistical reduction of the growth efficiency with high doses during a short period of time, it is important to interpret the findings with caution. Longer and larger clinical trials are required to validate this observation since compensatory overgrowth in neonates is possible, minimizing the relevance of this potential side effect in the long term.

Lactobacilli are generally regarded as beneficial, but under different circumstances (not due to the administration of microbial dietary additives), a net reduction of fecal lactobacilli has been reported in other animal species and humans as a consequence of stressing factors, which together are believed to carry an additive risk for negative health effects [40]. In monkeys, early maternal separation as stressor factor has resulted in increased intestinal infection risks with Campylobacter jejuni and Shigella flexneri and reduced counts of fecal lactobacilli [41, 42]. Of experimental and clinical interest, prenatal acoustic stress inflicted to monkeys during gestation resulted in newborn monkeys having reduced fecal lactobacilli for several weeks after birth [42]. Studies in mice have shown somewhat similar results depending on the stressor tested. Reduced fecal lactobacilli have been induced by stressing mice using constant shaking of their housing cage, by overnight physical restrain in confined spaces, by social stress or conflict, or by housing mice without bedding material. Water restriction, although deemed stressful, has not always reproduced such reduction in murine fecal lactobacilli [4345]. Stress was also shown to reduce the number of tissue-associated lactobacilli in the colon of experimental mice [46] indicating that stress-mediated immunomodulation could be detrimental for the commensal interaction of the host with lactobacilli. In humans, studies with college students during the week of final exams have shown less lactobacilli in the stools compared to fecal concentrations the first week of the semester [47]. Although salivary cortisol indicated that stress was associated with lactobacilli reductions during exam times, it is worthwhile to notice that dietary anomalies also occurred during final exams, which could independently modulate the gut microbiota and possibly reduce the concentrations of fecal lactobacilli.

Stressor-induced immunomodulation is plausible as part of the gut-axis hypothesis to connect the host wellbeing to the gut microbiota and the reduction of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria in the aforementioned scenarios. However, in the present study, the daily clinical examination of the neonatal calves, and the assessment of appetite, animal behaviour, and attitude towards the milk feeding and the environment indicated that stress or depression are unlikely the cause of lactobacilli reduction in our report. The only difference in treatment between the closest groups (high versus low-dose Lplant-B80) was 1000-fold more L. plantarum CFUs, which is unlikely to have been perceived by the animals as a stressing factor. As the animal handlers were also blinded to the treatment codes, it is also unlikely that bias existed in the form of managerial/husbandry-induced stress only in the high-dose group of calves. Experimentally, mice stressed are more likely to have increased susceptibility to coliform intestinal infections (e.g., Citrobacter rodentium) [48], which can be reverted by administering Lactobacillus reuteri [49]. In our study, the reduction of cultivable lactobacilli in the high-dose Lplant-B80 group did not result in an increased load of fecal coliforms or signs of intestinal disease in the neonatal calves, indicating that previously observed associations between stress, increased risk of infections, and reduced fecal lactobacilli do not exactly apply to our findings.

In a series of studies required for the validation of commercial probiotics, this report represents the first in vivo safety and colonization blinded-placebo study in calves for this strain. Aware of the technical difficulties and limitations of 16S microbiome in speciation of cultivable bacteria within the Lactobacillus genus, our results were deemed to be optimal in identifying and assessing the impact of feeding cultivable Lplant-B80-like bacteria to neonatal animals, as supported by single-colony 16S rDNA gene Sanger sequencing. This study provides preliminary statistical evidence that the significant reduction of fecal LAB in the calves in the high-dose group (assessed using valid repeated-measure statistical methods) is independent of the concentration of L. plantarum-B80 like bacteria in the feces.

In conclusion, our findings indicate that high doses of halotolerant gut-indigenous L. plantarum-B80 reduce cultivable lactobacilli in newborn calves without increasing its species abundance and without exerting overly signs of clinical disease or bacterial translocation to the regional mesenteric lymph nodes. Our findings do not necessarily support the assumption that reduced lactobacilli always correlate with coliform proliferation and risk of intestinal infections or disease. Mechanistic studies using conventional and germ-free hosts, aided with fluorescent chromosomal reporting probes, and clinical trials for specific end-point health outcomes are warranted to determine the impact of reduced LAB on health and the potential value of using high doses and halotolerance as criteria to select future commercially suitable probiotic strains.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors want to express their sincere gratitude to Gabrielle Monteith for statistical advice, Joyce Rousseau for technical assistance, and the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food for financial support. Alexander Rodriguez-Palacios receives as an Assistant Professor the generous support from the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation of America via a Career Development Award.

References

  1. F. Guarner, A. G. Khan, J. Garisch et al., “World gastroenterology organisation global guidelines: probiotics and prebiotics october 2011,” Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 468–481, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. F. Guarner and G. J. Schaafsma, “Probiotics,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 237-238, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. J. Suhr, N. Banjara, and H. E. Hallen-Adams, “Sequence-based methods for detecting and evaluating the human gut mycobiome,” Letters in Applied Microbiology, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 209–215, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. F. Fouhy, A. G. Clooney, C. Stanton, M. J. Claesson, and P. D. Cotter, “16S rRNA gene sequencing of mock microbial populations-impact of DNA extraction method, primer choice and sequencing platform,” BMC Microbiology, vol. 16, no. 1, article 123, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. B. E. R. Rubin, J. G. Sanders, J. Hampton-Marcell, S. M. Owens, J. A. Gilbert, and C. S. Moreau, “DNA extraction protocols cause differences in 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing efficiency but not in community profile composition or structure,” MicrobiologyOpen, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 910–921, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. K. Burbach, J. Seifert, D. H. Pieper, and A. Camarinha-Silva, “Evaluation of DNA extraction kits and phylogenetic diversity of the porcine gastrointestinal tract based on illumina sequencing of two hypervariable regions,” MicrobiologyOpen, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 70–82, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. Y. Lu, P. Hugenholtz, and D. J. Batstone, “Evaluating DNA extraction methods for community profiling of pig hindgut microbial community,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 11, Article ID e0142720, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. Harding, A. Rodriguez-Palacios, L. Kaydo et al., “Tu1738 effects of the artificial sweetener, splenda®, in experimental crohn's disease,” Gastroenterology, vol. 146, no. 5, p. s-830, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. A. Rodriguez-Palacios, H. R. Staempfli, T. Duffield, and J. S. Weese, “Isolation of bovine intestinal Lactobacillus plantarum and pediococcus acidilactici with inhibitory activity against escherichia coli O157 and F5,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 393–401, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Basson, A. Trotter, A. Rodriguez-Palacios, and F. Cominelli, “Mucosal interactions between genetics, diet, and microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 7, no. article 290, p. 290, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. K. D. Munns, L. B. Selinger, K. Stanford, L. Guan, T. R. Callaway, and T. A. McAllister, “Perspectives on super-shedding of escherichia coli O157:H7 by cattle,” Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 89–103, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. Mañé, E. Pedrosa, V. Lorén et al., “A mixture of lactobacillus plantarum CECT 7315 and CECT 7316 enhances systemic immunity in elderly subjects. A dose-response, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized pilot trial,” Nutricion Hospitalaria, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 228–235, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. Rodriguez-Palacios, T. Kodani, L. Kaydo et al., “Stereomicroscopic 3D-pattern profiling of murine and human intestinal inflammation reveals unique structural phenotypes,” Nature Communications, vol. 6, article 7577, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. P. De Cruz, S. Kang, J. Wagner et al., “Association between specific mucosa-associated microbiota in Crohn's disease at the time of resection and subsequent disease recurrence: a pilot study,” Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia), vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 268–278, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. Rodriguez-Palacios, L. Kaydo, D. Pietropaoli, and F. Cominelli, “Su2016 stereomicroscopy in pre-clinical and immunological studies of acute and chronic intestinal inflammation,” Gastroenterology, vol. 146, no. 5, pp. S-523–S-524, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. BBL, BBL crystal identification system. An Identification Systems. Anaerobe ID Kit. ANALYTE: 0412; TEST SYSTEM: 07561. 2014.
  17. M. A. Boyd, M. A. D. Antonio, and S. L. Hillier, “Comparison of API 50 CH strips to whole-chromosomal DNA probes for identification of Lactobacillus species,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 5309–5311, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. E. M. Brolazo, D. S. Leite, M. R. Tiba, M. Villarroel, C. Marconi, and J. A. Simoes, “Correlation between api 50 ch and multiplex polymerase chain reaction for the identification of vaginal lactobacilli in isolates,” Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 225–232, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. H. Cai, M. Archambault, and J. F. Prescott, “16S ribosomal RNA sequence-based identification of veterinary clinical bacteria,” Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 465–469, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. J. Kullen, R. B. Sanozky-Dawes, D. C. Crowell, and T. R. Klaenhammer, “Use of the DNA sequence of variable regions of the 16S rRNA gene for rapid and accurate identification of bacteria in the lactobacillus acidophilus complex,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 511–516, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. K. Tamura, D. Peterson, N. Peterson, G. Stecher, M. Nei, and S. Kumar, “MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 2731–2739, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. I. Dohoo, W. Martin, and H. Stryhn, “Cohort studies,” in Veterinary Epidemiologic Research, S. M. McPike, Ed., vol. 69, pp. 151–162, Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  23. T. Lang and M. Secic, “How to report statistics in medicine. Anotated guideline for authors, editors, and reviewers,” in American College of Physicians, T. Lang and M. Secic, Eds., American college of physicians, Phyladelphia, PA, USA, 2nd edition edition, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  24. S.-B. Fang, H.-C. Lee, J.-J. Hu, S.-Y. Hou, H.-L. Liu, and H.-W. Fang, “Dose-dependent effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus on quantitative reduction of faecal rotavirus shedding in children,” Journal of Tropical Pediatrics, vol. 55, no. 5, Article ID fmp001, pp. 297–301, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. Tohno, H. Kobayashi, M. Nomura, R. Uegaki, and Y. Cai, “Identification and characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from mixed pasture of timothy and orchardgrass, and its badly preserved silage,” Animal Science Journal, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 318–330, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. H. M. Timmerman, L. Mulder, H. Everts et al., “Health and growth of veal calves fed milk replacers with or without probiotics,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 88, no. 6, pp. 2154–2165, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. G. E. Ward and D. I. Nelson, “Effects of dietary milk fat (whole milk) and propionic acid on intestinal coliforms and lactobacilli in calves,” American Journal of Veterinary Research, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 1165–1167, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. B. F. Jenny, H. J. Vandijk, and J. A. Collins, “Performance and fecal flora of calves fed a bacillus subtilis concentrate,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 1968–1973, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. M. L. Signorini, L. P. Soto, M. V. Zbrun, G. J. Sequeira, M. R. Rosmini, and L. S. Frizzo, “Impact of probiotic administration on the health and fecal microbiota of young calves: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of lactic acid bacteria,” Research in Veterinary Science, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 250–258, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. J. S. Weese, M. E. C. Anderson, A. Lowe, and G. J. Monteith, “Preliminary investigation of the probiotic potential of lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG in horses: fecal recovery following oral administration and safety,” Canadian Veterinary Journal, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 299–302, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. S. Weese and M. E. C. Anderson, “Preliminary evaluation of lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG, a potential probiotic in dogs,” Canadian Veterinary Journal, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 771–774, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. C. Schwab, J. Moore, P. Hoyt, and J. Prentice, “Performance and fecal flora of calves fed a nonviable lactobacillus bulgaricus fermentation product,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 1412–1424, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. S. Settachaimongkon, H. J. F. van Valenberg, I. Gazi et al., “Influence of lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 on post-acidification, metabolite formation and survival of starter bacteria in set-yoghurt,” Food Microbiology, vol. 59, pp. 14–22, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. W. F. van Zyl, S. M. Deane, and L. M. T. Dicks, “Enterococcus mundtii ST4SA and Lactobacillus plantarum 423 excludes Listeria monocytogenes from the GIT, as shown by bioluminescent studies in mice,” Beneficial Microbes, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 227–235, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. S. Mukherjee and A. Ramesh, “Bacteriocin-producing strains of lactobacillus plantarum inhibit adhesion of staphylococcus aureus to extracellular matrix: quantitative insight and implications in antibacterial therapy,” Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 64, no. 12, pp. 1514–1526, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. H. Jiang, P. Li, and Q. Gu, “Heterologous expression and purification of plantaricin NC8, a two-peptide bacteriocin against salmonella spp. from lactobacillus plantarum ZJ316,” Protein Expression and Purification, vol. 127, pp. 28–34, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. J.-H. Xie, S.-T. Fan, S.-P. Nie et al., “Lactobacillus plantarum NCU116 attenuates cyclophosphamide-induced intestinal mucosal injury, metabolism and intestinal microbiota disorders in mice,” Food and Function, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1584–1592, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. S. Fujiwara, Y. Seto, A. Kimura, and H. Hashiba, “Establishment of orally-administered lactobacillus gasseri SBT2055SR in the gastrointestinal tract of humans and its influence on intestinal microflora and metabolism,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 343–352, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. M. De Angelis, S. Siragusa, M. Berloco et al., “Selection of potential probiotic lactobacilli from pig feces to be used as additives in pelleted feeding,” Research in Microbiology, vol. 157, no. 8, pp. 792–801, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. J. D. Galley and M. T. Bailey, “Impact of stressor exposure on the interplay between commensal microbiota and host inflammation,” Gut Microbes, vol. 5, no. 3, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. M. T. Bailey and C. L. Coe, “Maternal separaseparation disrupts the integrity of the intestinal microflora in infant rhesus monkeys,” Developmental Psychobiology, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 146–155, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. M. T. Bailey, G. R. Lubach, and C. L. Coe, “Prenatal stress alters bacterial colonization of the gut in infant monkeys,” Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 414–421, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. M. T. Bailey, R. Avitsur, H. Engler, D. A. Padgett, and J. F. Sheridan, “Physical defeat reduces the sensitivity of murine splenocytes to the suppressive effects of corticosterone,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 416–424, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. T. Buynitsky and D. I. Mostofsky, “Restraint stress in biobehavioral research: recent developments,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 1089–1098, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. G. W. Tannock and D. C. Savage, “Influences of dietary and environmental stress on microbial populations in the murine gastrointestinal tract,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 591–598, 1974. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. J. D. Galley, M. C. Nelson, Z. Yu et al., “Exposure to a social stressor disrupts the community structure of the colonic mucosa-associated microbiota,” BMC Microbiology, vol. 14, no. 1, article 189, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. S. R. Knowles, E. A. Nelson, and E. A. Palombo, “Investigating the role of perceived stress on bacterial flora activity and salivary cortisol secretion: a possible mechanism underlying susceptibility to illness,” Biological Psychology, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 132–137, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. M. T. Bailey, S. E. Dowd, N. M. A. Parry, J. D. Galley, D. B. Schauer, and M. Lyte, “Stressor exposure disrupts commensal microbial populations in the intestines and leads to increased colonization by citrobacter rodentium,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 1509–1519, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. A. R. Mackos, T. D. Eubank, N. M. A. Parry, and M. T. Bailey, “Probiotic lactobacillus reuteri attenuates the stressor-enhanced severity of citrobacter rodentium infection,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 81, no. 9, pp. 3253–3263, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus