Magnitude of Biofilm Formation and Antimicrobial Resistance Pattern of Bacteria Isolated from Urinary Catheterized Inpatients of Jimma University Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia
Table 6
Antimicrobial-resistance patterns between biofilm and nonbiofilm former bacterial isolates from urinary catheterized inpatients of JUMC, Southwest Ethiopia, 2016.
Antimicrobials
Susceptibility pattern#
Biofilm formation pattern and antimicrobial resistance (%)
Chi-square
BP ()
NBP ()
Odds ratio
value
AMC
Sensitive
11 (25.6)
7 (63.6)
5.71
0.017
Resistant
32 (74.4)
4 (36.4)
CIP
Sensitive
23 (53.5)
10 (90.9)
5.16
0.023
Resistant
20 (46.5)
1 (9.1)
CRO
Sensitive
17 (39.5)
8 (72.7)
3.88
0.049
Resistant
26 (60.5)
3 (27.3)
GN
Sensitive
5 (11.6)
4 (38.4)
3.86
0.0495
Resistant
38 (88.4)
7 (63.6)
F
Sensitive
26 (60.5)
9 (81.8)
1.75
0.186
Resistant
17 (39.5)
2 (18.2)
SXT
Sensitive
9 (20.9)
4 (36.4)
1.14
0.285
Resistant
34 (79.1)
7 (63.6)
Tet
Sensitive
8 (18.6)
4 (36.4)
1.60
0.206
Resistant
35 (81.4)
7 (63.6)
AK
Sensitive
33 (76.7)
10 (90.9)
1.08
0.298
Resistant
10 (23.3)
1 (9.1)
Biofilm-forming bacteria with tendency to become more antimicrobial resistant compared with that of nonbiofilm producing ones (). Nonsignificant. #Very little intermediate susceptibilities of isolate results were merged to susceptible category.
