International Journal of Photoenergy

International Journal of Photoenergy / 2014 / Article
Special Issue

Solar Energy Conversion by Nanostructured TiO2

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 563879 |

Ting Feng, Gen Sheng Feng, Lei Yan, Jia Hong Pan, "One-Dimensional Nanostructured TiO2 for Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Pollutants in Wastewater", International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 2014, Article ID 563879, 14 pages, 2014.

One-Dimensional Nanostructured TiO2 for Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Pollutants in Wastewater

Academic Editor: Xiwang Zhang
Received04 Apr 2014
Revised12 Jun 2014
Accepted23 Jun 2014
Published05 Aug 2014


The present paper reviews the progress in the synthesis of one-dimensional (1D) TiO2 nanostructures and their environmental applications in the removal of organic pollutants. According to the shape, 1D TiO2 nanostructures can be divided into nanorods, nanotubes, nanowires/nanofibers, and nanobelts. Each of them can be synthesized via different technologies, such as sol-gel template method, chemical vapor deposition, and hydrothermal method. These methods are discussed in this paper, and the recent development of the synthesis technologies is also presented. Furthermore, the organic pollutants, degradation using the synthesized 1D TiO2 nanostructures is studied as an important application of photocatalytic oxidation (PCO). The 1D nanostructured TiO2 exhibited excellent photocatalytic activity in a PCO process, and the mechanism of photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants is also discussed. Moreover, the modification of 1D TiO2 nanostructures using metal ions, metal oxide, or inorganic element can further enhance the photocatalytic activity of the photocatalyst. This phenomenon can be explained by the suppression of e-h+ pairs recombination rate, increased specific surface area, and reduction of band gap. In addition, 1D nanostructured TiO2 can be further constructed as a film or membrane, which may extend its practical applications.

1. Introduction

Organic pollutants are widely presented in wastewater, which have negative effects on environment and human health. Even developing water treatment technology calls for efficient decontamination method for complete degradation of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) [13]. Conventional biological, physical, and chemical processes have been employed and have showed capability in degrading most organic pollutants, while for POPs, complete degradation is still a big challenge. Advanced oxidation process (AOP) has thus developed by oxidization with hydroxyl radicals (•OH), which are provided by introducing ozone, hydrogen peroxide, and UV irradiation. However, complete degradation of POPs is still difficult due to the ease in forming disinfection by-products.

TiO2-mediated semiconductor photocatalysis has attracted considerable attention in view of their excellences in complete degradation of organic pollutants via photocatalytic oxidation (PCO) process. A general mechanism is illustrated in Figure 1 [4]. Initially, PCO process is triggered by the excitation of TiO2 under the irradiation of photons with energy greater than the band-gap energy of TiO2. The photogenerated electron (e) and holes (h+) pairs without recombination can migrate to TiO2 surface to participate in redox reactions with adsorbed species with the possible formation of superoxide radical anion (•) and hydroxyl radical (•OH), respectively. These reactive oxygen species are mainly responsible for the degradation of organic pollutants in water. Furthermore, the excitation of TiO2 by UV light can be displayed in the following equations [58]:

In an organic degradation process, the formed and act as reductant and oxidant, respectively. The reaction steps are represented as follows [6].

Oxidative Reaction:

Reductive Reaction:

Current research progress has shown that TiO2-based materials demonstrate highly active photocatalytic degradation of different organic pollutants [911]. For example, phenol, chlorinated aromatics, and aniline compounds are susceptible to oxidation by TiO2, and they can form intermediate radicals that may subsequently trigger a series of radical reactions in this process. Due to the excellent oxidation ability, the resulting intermediates can be finally degraded into and . Since the oxidation process is primarily driven by electron transfer reactions at the surface of TiO2, the specific surface area of TiO2 is an important factor which can affect the PCO efficiency.

To significantly boost the photoenergy conversion efficiency, tailing nanostructured TiO2 has attracted continuous research interest, among which one-dimensional (1D) nanostructures possessing large surface areas and unique physical and chemical specificities are of particular interest [12]. Various 1D nanostructures including nanorods, nanowires/nanofibers, nanotubes, and nanobelts have been successively synthesized during the past decades. Some typical synthetic methods of 1D TiO2 nanostructures are summarized in Table 1. Nanorods have a low aspect ratio (length divided by width) ranging from 3 to 5. Nanotubes are a type of nanometer-scale tube-like structure, which have a similar size with nanorods. For the nanowires/nanofibers, they have a higher aspect ratio as compared to nanorods. Nanobelt is a nanostructure in a form of belt. The specific geometry with high aspect ratio renders dramatical enhancements in charge carrier generation, transport, and separation, boosting the photoenergy conversion efficiency [13, 14]. Up to now 1D TiO2 has been comprehensively investigated for the degradation of organic pollutants, such as dyes, POPs (phenol and derivatives) and natural organic matters (NOMs) [15, 16].

TiO2 nanostructures Synthesis methods References

TiO2 nanorods Sol-gel template method [20]
Hydrothermal method [22]
Chemical vapor deposition [23]

TiO2 nanotubes Electrochemical deposition [37]
Template method [41, 42]
Hydrothermal method [39, 4446]

TiO2 nanowires/nanofibers Hydrothermal method [5]
Microwave [75]
Electrospinning [76]

TiO2 nanobelts Solvothermal method[65]
Chemical vapor deposition [68]
Hydrothermal method [67]

2. TiO2  Nanorods

TiO2 nanorods have a relatively small amount of grain boundaries and can act as single crystal, which is able to reduce the grain boundary effect and provide fast electron transport [17]. Previous reports indicated that TiO2 nanorods exhibited higher photocatalytic activity than nanoparticle counterparts due to the increased numbers of active sites and crystal plane effects [18]. Furthermore, TiO2 nanorods have lower recombination rate of e and h+ as compared with TiO2 nanoparticles, which would enhance the photocatalytic activity of the photocatalyst [19].

Various synthetic strategies have been designed for the preparation of TiO2 nanorods, which include sol-gel template method, chemical vapor deposition (CVD), and hydrothermal method [1923].

Attar et al. [20] developed an improved sol-gel template method for the synthesis of TiO2 nanorods, as shown in Figure 2(a). Anodic alumina membranes (Figure 2(a)) were applied as the template with pore sizes ranging from 50 to 300 nm. Owing to the adjustable membrane pore sizes, the diameter of the synthesized TiO2 nanorods can be controlled. Figure 2(b) shows the synthesized TiO2 nanorods with diameter of 160–250 nm, revealing that the nanorods synthesized via this method have a uniform diameter as well as a smooth surface. However, they found that the diameter of the synthesized TiO2 nanorods was much smaller than the pore size of the template, which was attributed to the densification and lateral shrinkage of the template during the annealing process.

Wu and Yu synthesized a novel type of well-aligned rutile and anatase TiO2 nanorods via a template-free metal-organic CVD method [21]. As shown in Figure 2(c), TiO2 nanorods were grown directly on a silicon substrate at a temperature of 500–700°C. The single-crystalline rutile and anatase TiO2 nanorods were formed at 630°C and 560°C, respectively, which indicated that the temperature was a key factor in the synthesis process. The disadvantage of this method is the complicated synthesis process, which is not suitable for production in large-scale.

Hydrothermal method is facile for the synthesis of 1D nanostructured TiO2 [22]. Feng et al. [22] developed a new type of nanorod film on glass substrates via a low-temperature hydrothermal process. As shown in Figure 2(d), the nanorods have diameters of 30–60 nm and they have uniform orientation. Furthermore, the authors found that the surface of the synthesized film has switchable wettability which transferred from superhydrophobicity to superhydrophilicity under UV light irradiation. This phenomenon can be explained by the reaction between the photogenerated holes and the lattice oxygen, leading to the formation of surface oxygen vacancies.

TiO2 nanorods have been widely used in PCO process for the degradation of organics [24]. For example, organic dyes and acetone can be effectively degraded into and . Melghit and Al-Rabaniah [24] prepared rutile TiO2 nanorods using a sol-gel method at room temperature, and the material exhibits excellent photodegradation of Congo red under sunlight. It can be explained by two aspects. (1) The Congo red is easily absorbed onto the synthesized TiO2 nanorods, and, subsequently, the dye decomposed in a PCO process. (2) Organic dyes are capable of photosensitizing TiO2 because of the absorption of visible light [25]. The photosensitization was considered as another way for the degradation of dyes in the presence of TiO2 under sunlight irradiation. It was worth noting that the synthesized rutile TiO2 nanorods which possess optimum size and shape are much more efficient for PCO process than the anatase TiO2 [24]. Yu and coworkers [26] synthesized TiO2 nanostructures using TiF4 and H3BO3 as the precursors. The morphology characterization revealed that the synthesized material is a combination of TiO2 nanorods and nanotubes. It is important to notice that the synthesized TiO2 exhibited a higher PCO efficiency for the degradation of acetone than that of P25 due to the larger specific surface area and pore volume of the synthesized TiO2. Moreover, compared with the nanosized powder photocatalysts, the prepared TiO2 is easier to be separated from aqueous solutions after PCO process due to its long structure, and it also possesses higher photocatalytic activity. In addition, the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 nanorods can be further improved via a thermal treatment because of the enhanced crystallization [27].

In order for facile recycling, TiO2 nanorods have been coated onto substrates. A successful example is that well-aligned TiO2 nanorod can be prepared on pretreated quartz substrate [28]. The quartz substrate was precoated with a thin rutile TiO2 seed layer to facilitate the subsequent growth of the rutile TiO2 nanorods. Owing to the excellent nucleation and growth properties, rutile TiO2 crystal seeds are more preferable than anatase TiO2. Thus, the pretreatment of substrates is important for the synthesized TiO2 morphology, which would also affect the performance of the material in a PCO process. Based on the experimental results, the density of TiO2 seeds can be controlled by the concentration of the coating colloid solution. Then the TiO2 crystal seeds will affect the growth density, diameter distribution, and growth morphologies of TiO2 nanorods. When the density of TiO2 seeds is high, the seeds tend to merge together to form larger TiO2 particles. It is shown that the degradation rates of methyl blue increased with large growth density and small diameter size of TiO2 nanorods.

Pure TiO2 is not an effective visible-light photocatalyst due to its wide band gap (>3.0 eV) and can be activated only by UV light at  nm. Modification of TiO2 has been explored to extend the absorption spectra of photocatalysts to visible light range [29]. Doping of TiO2 with various metals or nonmetals has been considered as a valid way to lower the band gap of TiO2 and thus make the photocatalyst more active under solar light. Doping of TiO2 would introduce allowed energy states within the band gap but very close to the energy band. The gap between the energy states and the nearest energy band is usually reduced. Thus, the electrons and holes would be more easily excited under visible light irradiation. Kerkez and Boz [30] used Cu2+ as a dopant to modify TiO2 nanorod array films (Figure 3(a)), and they found that the methylene blue degradation efficiency under visible light was increased 40% with respect to the efficiency of the unmodified sample. The notable improvement could be explained by the following factors. (1) acts as a trap of photogenerated electrons. The electrons were transferred from TiO2 to the conduction band of the CuO with little chance to return and thus increase the life time of . Thus, the presence of could retard the recombination rate of electrons and holes on the surface of the synthesized -TiO2. (2) The band gap of -TiO2 nanorods is lower than that of the original TiO2, which can extend the photoresponse of the photocatalyst and make the material utilizable under both UV light and visible light.

TiO2 nanorods with 3% of nitrogen doping were prepared by Lee and coworkers, as shown in Figure 3(b) [31]. Although the N-doping process did no change the morphology of TiO2 nanorods, it provides extra occupied states above its valence band which may enhance the photocatalytic activity. Lv et al. also reported the synthesis of N-F-doped visible light active TiO2 nanorods via a liquid phase deposition process (Figure 3(c)) [32]. They firstly synthesized ZnO nanorod arrays on glass substrates and then combined the ZnO nanorod arrays and TiO2 via an aqueous solution method to get the as-prepared TiO2 nanorods. Their experimental results indicated that the doping quantity of N and F in the resultant material could be easily controlled by adjusting the calcination temperature, and the optimal temperature was found to be 450°C. Owing to the higher visible light photocatalytic activity, the obtained TiO2 nanorods’ films exhibited higher degradation rate for methylene blue as compared to P25 films [32].

Metals have been incorporated into TiO2 nanorods to form nanocomposites with a heterojunction structure. For example, TiO2 nanorods can be coated by Au nanoparticles to form a novel heterojunction, as shown in Figure 3(d) [33]. As a model organic pollutant, methylene blue can be used to characterize the photocatalytic activity of the synthesized photocatalysts. 35% of methylene blue was degraded in the presence of Au-TiO2 nanorods, which is much more effective than that of 15% for pure nanorods. In addition, the other metals such as Ag and Cu can also be coated onto TiO2 nanorods [34, 35]. The synthesized nanocomposites exhibited outstanding photocatalytic activity as compared to the pure TiO2. The enhancement in photocatalytic activity is related with the slow recombination rate of charge carriers. During PCO process, the generated electrons from TiO2 nanorods could transfer to Au nanoparticles, leading to the longer lifetime of the pairs and therefore more reactive oxygen species produced for the degradation of organic pollutants in water. The mechanism of photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants over metal/TiO2 under UV light irradiation is shown in Figure 4.

3. TiO2  Nanotubes

Currently, TiO2 nanotube structures have been successfully synthesized and applied for organic pollutants degradation [36]. Hoyer [37] firstly reported the synthesis of TiO2 nanotubes via an electrochemical deposition in a porous aluminum oxide mold. Then, an electrochemical anodic oxidation method was developed by Zwilling et al. for the synthesis of TiO2 nanotubes [38]. Although this method is very facile to synthesize TiO2 nanotubes with controllable pore size, good uniformity, and conformability over large areas, the high cost of fabrication apparatus and complicated operation limited its further application [39, 40]. Templating method was considered as a suitable technology to construct materials with desirable morphology [41]. TiO2 nanotubes can be synthesized in controlled sol-gel hydrolysis of solutions containing titanium compounds and templating agents followed by polymerization or deposition of TiO2 on the template. For example, Peng and coworkers [42] fabricated TiO2 nanotubes via a surfactant-mediated templating method, and the fabrication process can be summarized in Figure 5. In the synthesis process, a sol-gel method was conducted for fabricating the material, and laurylamine hydrochloride (LAHC) was used as a template. Titanium alkoxide was first hydrolyzed with the addition of tetra-n-butyl-orthotitanate (TBOT), and then there is an interaction between partially charged hydrolytic species and laurylamine surfactant by H-bonding forces (Figure 5(a)). The edge part of the bilayer assemblies of LAHC was unstable and apt to combine with the interlayers, which lead to the enlargement of the layers (Figure 5(b)). Then the bilayer-like aggregates rearranged into lamellar-like liquid-crystal phases through the condensation reaction (Figure 5(c)). After the interlayer combination and crosslinking between adjacent hydrolyzed titanium alkoxide species, a mixed lamellar liquid-crystal phase membrane formed, and rodlike micelles were separated by bilayers of surfactant and water (Figure 5(d)). Upon the addition of TBOT, charge imbalance leads to the curvature of the membrane along one direction (Figure 5(e)) and then bends fully the membrane into tubules (Figure 5(f)). Moreover, the condensation of the hydrolyzed titanium species would lead to the rodlike micelles in a random arrangement (Figure 5(g)). The synthesized TiO2 nanotubes possess a hierarchical tubules-within-tubules structure with cylindrical nanochannels walls. This structure is a combination structure of microtube and nanotube, causing the formation of porous structure. Moreover, the specific surface area of the material is also increased. The structure would be beneficial for catalysts and thus enhance the PCO efficiency. Furthermore, the scale of the synthesized TiO2 nanotubes can be controlled by adjusting the morphology of the template [41]. However, the instability of the TiO2 nanotubes synthesized by this method is a big issue, and the tube morphology is easily destroyed [39, 40, 43].

Recently, hydrothermal method has been widely used for the synthesis of high quality of TiO2 nanotubes with diameter of about 10 nm [44]. Crystalline TiO2 nanoparticles and highly concentrated NaOH are normally used as the precursors in a typical hydrothermal process [41]. As a necessary step, the drying or calcination process is generally conducted, leading to the transformation of titanate nanotubes to TiO2 nanotubes. Based on previous reports [39, 45, 46], the advantages of hydrothermal process for TiO2 nanotubes synthesis can be concluded as the following. (1) It is suitable for large scale production; (2) the modification process of TiO2 nanotubes can be directly conducted in the synthetic system; (3) nanotubes with ultrahigh aspect ratio can be synthesized. However, hydrothermal process requires high temperature and pressure, as well as the long reaction time, which also cause a high cost. Figure 6 lists various TiO2 nanotubes synthesized by different methods.

TiO2 nanotubes can be used for the degradation of POPs such as benzene and acetaldehyde [47, 48]. Yuan et al. [49] studied the performance of TiO2 nanotubes for water treatment. The synthesized TiO2 nanotubes showed complete photodegradation of humic acid in comparison to the 97.7% removal efficiency of TiO2 P25. Moreover, the TiO2 nanotubes can be totally separated and recovered via a membrane filtration. The stability test presented that no catalyst deactivation was observed after five consecutive PCO experiments of newly added humic acid. Yuan et al. [49] degraded humic acid using an enhanced photocatalytic process with Al and Fe codoped TiO2 nanotubes as photocatalysts. They reported that calcination temperature, doping ions, and dosage of dopant would impact the PCO efficiency. Under an optimal condition of 1.0% codoped TiO2 nanotubes containing 0.25 : 0.75 of Al : Fe, 79.4% of humic acid was degraded and a pseudo-first-order rate constant of 0.172 min−1 was achieved. Bisphenol A (BPA) is a pervasive chemical intermediate primarily from the production of polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resin [50]. Over the past few years, considerable effort has been devoted to the development of effective treatment technologies of the removal for bisphenol A (BPA), such as Fenton’s reagent, ultrasonic cavitation, photocatalysis, and ozonation [51]. Recent research [52] displayed that a nearly complete removal of BPA was observed by Cu doped TiO2 nanotubes. The pseudo-first-order rate constants for BPA photodegradation by Cu doped TiO2 nanotubes at pH 7.0 were 2–5 times higher than that of pure Degussa P25. In a typical process, the generated electrons from TiO2 with a lower conduction band could recombine with the holes in Cu, resulting in the reduction of recombination rate of electrons and holes. Then, the holes and electrons reacted with water and oxygen to form peroxyl and hydroxyl radicals, respectively. In a supposed BPA degradation process, BPA radicals were generated via an electron transfer process. Subsequently, the BPA radicals triggered a suite of reactions of radical coupling, fragmentation, substitution, and elimination, which eventually resulted in degradation of BPA [53]. However, further study is needed to prove this mechanism. BPA molecules were firstly photodegraded into some intermediates and products with smaller molecular weight, and these intermediates can be further oxidized to and by the oxidative species produced in the PCO process. N-doped TiO2 nanotubes also showed enhanced photocatalytic activity. Based on the research work of Chen and coworkers [54], 72.5% and 89.4% of methyl orange are photodegraded in the presence of TiO2 nanotubes and N-doped TiO2 nanotubes, respectively. In addition, the degradation rate of methyl orange over TiO2 nanotubes without calcination is only 17.1%, which is lower than that (45.1%) of TiO2 nanotubes calcined at 200°C. This is due to the narrow band gap and good crystallinity [55]. However, the photocatalytic activity of the TiO2 nanotubes calcined at 400°C decreased, which can be attributed to the agglomeration and sintering damage of nanotubes caused by calcination at high temperature [56]. The specific surface area of the calcined material may also decrease due to the destruction of the nanotube structure.

4. TiO2Nanowires/Nanofibers

TiO2 nanowires/nanofibers are common nanostructures of TiO2, as shown in Figure 7. Fujishima et al. [5] prepared two kinds of TiO2 nanowires (TNW10 and TNW20) for the degradation of humic acid. The investigation of photocatalytic activities of the synthesized materials showed that TNW10 performed better than TiO2 P25 while TNW20 was as good as P25. This is due to the high ratio aspect of the synthesized TiO2 nanowires. Owing to the incomplete degradation, the degradation rates of total organic carbon content are lower than the removal rate of humic acid. This problem can be addressed by extending reaction time. Furthermore, the nanowires can be totally separated by a commercial microfiltration membrane with negligible membrane fouling. Piril and coworkers [57] studied the photocatalytic degradation of butanol in aqueous solutions using commercial TiO2, N-Pt-doped TiO2 nanofibers, and N-Pd-doped TiO2 nanofibers. The experimental results showed that the N-Pd-doped TiO2 nanofibers had high efficiency in the degradation of butanol under UV irradiation as compared to the N-Pt-doped TiO2 nanofibers and the commercial TiO2. It probably has relationship with the proton formation caused by better radical formation ability. GC-MS analysis revealed that butanol converted to some decomposition products such as aldehydes and ethanol [58]. Moreover, the synthesized materials had very similar BET surface area whereas they expressed relatively different reaction rate of the photocatalytic degradation, and it can be concluded that the specific surface area of the photocatalysts is not a key factor for the photocatalytic efficiency, while the doped metals played an important role in promoting the PCO reaction. In addition, doped TiO2 nanofibers can be synthesized by electrospinning followed by calcination process [59]. The different dosage of would affect the photodegradation rate of methylene blue. For example, 96.1% of methylene blue was removed in the presence of TiO2 nanofibers with 2 at.% , which was considered as an optimum doping dosage. Furthermore, the synthesized nanofibers were successfully recycled and reused for five times with little photocatalytic activity reduced. TiO2 nanowires can also combine with other nanostructures, which can enhance the photocatalytic activity. Fe2O3 nanoparticles have been grafted onto TiO2 nanowires by Qin and coworkers via a facile impregnation–solvothermal method [60]. The synthesized heterojunctions exhibited remarkable photocatalytic activity for photocatalytic oxidation of Direct Red 4BS in the presence of H2O2. Moreover, the material showed good tolerance with respect to organic matter poisoning due to the synergetic effect of TiO2 nanowires and Fe2O3 nanoparticles. The size of Fe2O3 also affected the performance of the material, and it can be controlled by adjusting the impregnation duration time in the synthesis process. The possible reaction pathways are shown as follows [60]: where the 4BS stands for the dye molecule and the stands for the produced intermediates.

The heterojunction of TiO2 nanofibers and nanoparticles can promote the separation of photogenerated e and . The conduction band of is more active as compared to that of TiO2, leading to the electrons transfer from TiO2 to and the further conversion to . Since promotes the decomposition of to OH [61], the photocatalytic activity was enhanced in this charge transfer process.

Liu and coworkers [62] prepared another kind of core-shell heterojunctions (TiO2-B nanowires and anatase nanocrystals) using a combination of hydrothermal and calcination methods. Similarly, the charge recombination rate was suppressed. The synthesized material tends to separate the and into two different regions of the catalyst and thus enhances photocatalytic efficiency [63].

Recently, TiO2 nanowire membranes were fabricated and applied for organics degradation in water purification process due to their photocatalytic activity, excellent chemical resistance, and thermal stability [6466].

Microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes have been successfully synthesized by Zhang and coworkers. The membranes were fabricated by TiO2 nanowires with different diameters. In a typical synthesis process, The TiO2 nanowires’ suspension was first filtered via a vacuum filtration setup to form a porous functional layer. After drying at 105°C, a free-standing membrane can be peeled off from the filter. Finally, the membrane was pressurized under 5 bar at 120°C via a hot-press before being calcined at 550°C. As shown in Figure 8(a) [64], the synthesized membranes were robust and flexible and they possess multifunctions. In continuous experiments, the synthesized TiO2 microfiltration nanowire membrane achieved near 100% and 93.6% removal rate of humic acid and total organics carbon, respectively. It is important to notice that the transmembrane pressure of the nanowire membrane did not change under UV light irradiation (Figure 8(b), [66]), indicating the antifouling and self-cleaning property of the synthesized TiO2 nanowire membrane. The organic pollutants can be degraded concurrently during the filtration process. For a TiO2 nanowire ultrafiltration membrane, the membrane showed a higher separation ability as well as excellent photocatalytic activity due to the enhanced selectivity. The rejection rate of humic acid by the ultrafiltration membrane can be achieved till 65% without UV irradiation, and even the bacteria (E. coli) can be intercepted by the membrane. In addition, the synthesized membranes were capable of overcoming the polymeric membrane problems such as membrane fouling and high-temperature applications. The antifouling property would facilitate the regeneration of the membrane and thus lower the cost for membrane cleaning.

TiO2 nanowires membrane can also apply for the degradation of pharmaceuticals in water [65]. The membrane was directly fabricated by hydrothermal growth on Ti substrates at 180°C with the assistance of some organic solvents. Experimental details revealed that various pharmaceuticals such as norfluoxetine, atorvastatin, lincomycin, and fluoxetine were almost completely removed in a concurrent filtration and PCO process.

5. TiO2  Nanobelts

TiO2 nanobelts can be synthesized via CVD, solvothermal, and hydrothermal methods [6769]. Gao and coworkers [69] reported the self-catalytic growth of codoped TiO2 nanobelts via a metallorganic CVD method, and they found that rutile structure is dominant in the synthesized material. Furthermore, the material exhibited a magnetic anisotropy with a high coercive field value at room temperature. This property may facilitate the separation of the synthesized material after PCO process.

A solvothermal process was carried out to synthesize nitrogen-fluorine codoped TiO2 (N-F-TiO2) by He et al. [67]. Amorphous titania microspheres were used as precursors, which were prepared by the hydrolysis of Ti(OBu)4. The synthesized N-F-TiO2 nanobelts showed higher photocatalytic activity for the degradation of methyl orange as compared to that of TiO2 P25. As shown in Figure 9, the codoped nanobelts photocatalyst exhibited the highest decrease in COD values for the degradation of organic compounds under both visible light and UV irradiation. This phenomenon can be attributed to the porous structures of the synthesized N-F-TiO2, the increased specific surface area, and enhanced light adsorption. The N-F doping induced oxygen vacancy and led to the red shift in optical energy gap. Moreover, the nanobelt structure of the synthesized material would facilitate the capture of photogenerated photons and thus promote the formation of .

Hydrothermal methods are more commonly used for TiO2 nanobelts synthesis [7072]. A commercial P25 TiO2 can be used as a precursor, which is subsequently hydrothermally treated for nanobelts synthesis, as shown in Figure 10(a) [70]. However, the photocatalytic activity of the synthesized TiO2 nanobelts was lower than that of P25. The degradation rates of methyl orange are 35% and 95% in the presence of TiO2 nanobelts and P25, respectively. To further enhance the performance of the material for organics degradation, NiO nanoparticles were successfully deposited onto the nanobelts, as shown in Figure 10(b). The synthesized materials were applied for the decomposition of methyl orange under ultraviolet light irradiation. Experimental results indicated that heterojunction NiO-TiO2 nanobelts showed better performance for the methyl orange removal as compared to both pure NiO nanoparticles and TiO2 nanobelts. It can be attributed to the increased specific surface area and extended e-h+ lifetime.

Similar with this kind of heterojunction, other meal oxides nanoparticles and TiO2 nanobelts can also be combined together for the improvement of photocatalytic activity. Zhang et al. prepared Cu2O/TiO2 heterojunctions using a combination process of hydrothermal method and chemical precipitation method [71]. The TiO2 nanobelt acted as a substrate, and the dosage of Cu2O can be controlled by adjusting the concentration of the precursor (copper sulfate). Figure 10(c) shows that Cu2O nanoparticles were evenly grafted onto the TiO2 nanobelts. Moreover, the synthesized heterojunction possessed higher adsorbability as compared to pure TiO2 nanobelt. Although the photocatalytic activity of the synthesized material showed a little decrease, the decoloration activity of the material for organics was enhanced. This phenomenon is attributed to the strong adsorption of methyl orange molecules on the surface of Cu2O with exposure of facets.

Tian et al. synthesized novel CeO2/TiO2 nanobelt heterojunctions via a facile hydrothermal process, as shown in Figure 10(d) [72]. Compared with TiO2, the synthesized CeO2/TiO2 exhibited enhanced photocatalytic performance for the degradation of methyl orange due to the proposed capture-photodegradation release mechanism. During PCO process, methyl orange molecules were captured by CeO2 nanoparticles, then degraded by photogenerated radicals, and finally released to the solution. Since the PCO process is mainly conducted at the surface of photocatalysts, the adsorption capacity of CeO2 nanoparticles was found to be important for the performance of PCO process. The synthesized CeO2/TiO2 nanobelt heterojunctions possessed good stability, high activity, and recyclable properties.

TiO2 nanobelts have been applied to photocatalyze the oxidation of pharmaceutical contaminants in wastewater. Liang and coworkers [73] prepared anatase phase TiO2 nanobelts with 30–100 nm in width and 10 μm in length via a high temperature hydrothermal method. Their results showed that persistent pharmaceuticals such as malachite green, naproxen, carbamazepine, and theophylline can be efficiently photodegraded in the presence of the synthesized TiO2 nanobelts. The photogenerated active oxygen species such as hydroxyl radical, , and hydrogen peroxide were determined and it was proven that they played an important role in the PCO process. Investigation on operation parameters presented that photodegradation of the pharmaceuticals was evidently dependent on pH, illumination time, temperature, and concentrations of contaminants. This work heralds a pathway towards the photodegradation of organics in actual wastewater. TiO2 nanobelts can have potential in applications of industrial wastewater.

6. Conclusions

This review paper overviews the recent development in synthesis of 1D TiO2 nanostructures and their photocatalytic applications for organics degradation. Thanks to the development of nanotechnology, significant progress has been achieved in controllable synthesis of 1D TiO2 materials with different aspect ratio and inner structure (solid nanowire, nanorod, nanobelt, and hollow nanotube). Various synthetic strategies have been developed, prompting the subsequent exploration of their photocatalytic properties and the practical environmental applications. Under the excitation of UV light, efficient degradation of organic pollutants, such as NOMs, POPs, dyes, phenols, and pharmaceuticals, has been achieved by numerous groups. On contrast, solar-light-active 1D TiO2 material is still in its infant stage. Since solar energy is economical, solar photocatalysis using 1D TiO2 nanostructures would be a promising pathway for the degradation of organic pollutants. It is important to note that the application of 1D TiO2 in industry cannot be successful without solar energy assistance. Thus, many future works should concentrate on the synthesis of solar-light-active TiO2 materials. Doping of 1D TiO2 is considered as a possible way to lower the band gap of TiO2 and thus enhance the activity of TiO2 under solar light. Moreover, sensitization of 1D TiO2 nanostructures with other narrow-band-gap semiconductor and noble metals (e.g., Au or Ag) may further enhance the photocatalytic activity by suppressing the charge recombination rate.

Alternatively, 1D nanostructured TiO2 materials can be used as building blocks to assemble active and integrated nanosystems, such as TiO2 nanorod, nanotube, or nanowire membrane or film. The coupling of semiconductor photocatalysis of 1D nanomaterials and engineering design such as self-cleaning membrane filtration and microreactor construction might significantly broaden the application range of 1D TiO2 photocatalysts. Rapid progress is expected and will mainly occur in developing economic and scalable synthetic strategy of 1D TiO2 nanostructures and their industry-scale applications in water treatment process.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


  1. G. T. Daigger, B. E. Rittmann, S. Adham, and G. Andreottola, “Are membrane bioreactors ready for widespread application?” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 39, no. 19, pp. 399A–406A, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  2. M. A. Shannon, P. W. Bohn, M. Elimelech, J. G. Georgiadis, B. J. Marĩas, and A. M. Mayes, “Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades,” Nature, vol. 452, no. 7185, pp. 301–310, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. T. Zhang, X. Zhang, J. Ng, H. Yang, J. Liu, and D. D. Sun, “Fabrication of magnetic cryptomelane-type manganese oxide nanowires for water treatment,” Chemical Communications, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 1890–1892, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. Y. Ghaly, T. S. Jamil, I. E. El-Seesy, E. R. Souaya, and R. A. Nasr, “Treatment of highly polluted paper mill wastewater by solar photocatalytic oxidation with synthesized nano TiO2,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 168, no. 1, pp. 446–454, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. A. Fujishima, T. N. Rao, and D. A. Tryk, “Titanium dioxide photocatalysis,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. Ahmed, M. G. Rasul, R. Brown, and M. A. Hashib, “Influence of parameters on the heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of pesticides and phenolic contaminants in wastewater: a short review,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 311–330, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  7. A. L. Linsebigler, G. Lu, and J. T. Yates Jr., “Photocatalysis on TiO2 surfaces: principles, mechanisms, and selected results,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 735–758, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. T. Zhang, X. Yan, and D. D. Sun, “Hierarchically multifunctional K-OMS-2/TiO2/Fe3O4 heterojunctions for the photocatalytic oxidation of humic acid under solar light irradiation,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 243, pp. 302–310, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. C. L. Bianchi, S. Gatto, C. Pirola et al., “Photocatalytic degradation of acetone, acetaldehyde and toluene in gas-phase: comparison between nano and micro-sized TiO2,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 146, pp. 123–130, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J. Herrmann, “Heterogeneous photocatalysis: fundamentals and applications to the removal of various types of aqueous pollutants,” Catalysis Today, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 115–129, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. Stylidi, D. I. Kondarides, and X. E. Verykios, “Visible light-induced photocatalytic degradation of Acid Orange 7 in aqueous TiO2 suspensions,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 189–201, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. M. Khin, A. S. Nair, V. J. Babu, R. Murugan, and S. Ramakrishna, “A review on nanomaterials for environmental remediation,” Energy and Environmental Science, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 8075–8109, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. X. Quan, S. Yang, X. Ruan, and H. Zhao, “Preparation of titania nanotubes and their environmental applications as electrode,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 3770–3775, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. X. Chen and S. S. Mao, “Titanium dioxide nanomaterials: synthesis, properties, modifications and applications,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 107, no. 7, pp. 2891–2959, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. C. W. Lai, J. C. Juan, W. B. Ko, and S. B. A. Hamid, “An overview: recent development of titanium oxide nanotubes as photocatalyst for dye degradation,” International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 2014, Article ID 524135, 14 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. F. Niu, L. Zhang, C. Chen et al., “Hydrophilic TiO2 porous spheres anchored on hydrophobic polypropylene membrane for wettability induced high photodegrading activities,” Nanoscale, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 1480–1484, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J. Qu and C. Lai, “One-dimensional TiO2 nanostructures as photoanodes for dye-sensitized solar cells,” Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2003, Article ID 762730, 11 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. Liang, F. Teng, G. Bulgan, R. Zong, and Y. Zhu, “Effect of phase structure of MnO2 nanorod catalyst on the activity for CO oxidation,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 112, no. 14, pp. 5307–5315, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. Y. Lia, M. Guo, M. Zhang, and X. Wang, “Hydrothermal synthesis and characterization of TiO2 nanorod arrays on glass substrates,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 4, pp. 1232–1237, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  20. A. S. Attar, M. S. Ghamsari, F. Hajiesmaeilbaigi, S. Mirdamadi, K. Katagiri, and K. Koumoto, “Sol-gel template synthesis and characterization of aligned anatase-TiO2 nanorod arrays with different diameter,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 113, no. 2-3, pp. 856–860, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. J. J. Wu and C. C. Yu, “Aligned TiO2 nanorods and nanowalls,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 108, no. 11, pp. 3377–3379, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. X. J. Feng, J. Zhai, and L. Jiang, “The fabrication and switchable superhydrophobicity of TiO2 nanorod films,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 44, no. 32, pp. 5115–5118, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. S. Feng, J. Yang, M. Liu et al., “CdS quantum dots sensitized TiO2 nanorod-array-film photoelectrode on FTO substrate by electrochemical atomic layer epitaxy method,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 8, pp. 321–326, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. K. Melghit and S. S. Al-Rabaniah, “Photodegradation of Congo red under sunlight catalysed by nanorod rutile TiO2,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, vol. 184, no. 3, pp. 331–334, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. F. Han, V. S. R. Kambala, M. Srinivasan, D. Rajarathnam, and R. Naidu, “Tailored titanium dioxide photocatalysts for the degradation of organic dyes in wastewater treatment: a review,” Applied Catalysis A: General, vol. 359, no. 1-2, pp. 25–40, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. H. Yu, J. Yu, B. Cheng, and J. Lin, “Synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic activity of mesoporous titania nanorod/titanate nanotube composites,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 147, no. 1-2, pp. 581–587, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. Q. Mu, Y. Li, Q. Zhang, and H. Wang, “Template-free formation of vertically oriented TiO2 nanorods with uniform distribution for organics-sensing application,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 188, no. 1–3, pp. 363–368, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. M. Gao, Y. Li, M. Guo, M. Zhang, and X. Wang, “Effect of substrate pretreatment on controllable growth of TiO2 nanorod arrays,” Journal of Materials Science and Technology, vol. 28, pp. 577–586, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. Q. L. Yu and H. J. H. Brouwers, “Design of a novel photocatalytic gypsum plaster: with the indoor air purification property,” Advanced Materials Research, vol. 65, pp. 751–756, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  30. Ö. Kerkez and İ. Boz, “Photo(electro)catalytic activity of Cu2+-modified TiO2 nanorod array thin films under visible light irradiation,” Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, vol. 75, pp. 611–618, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  31. M. Lee, H. J. Yun, S. Yu, and J. Yi, “Enhancement in photocatalytic oxygen evolution via water oxidation under visible light on nitrogen-doped TiO2 nanorods with dominant reactive {102} facets,” Catalysis Communications, vol. 43, pp. 11–15, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. Y. Lv, Z. Fu, B. Yang et al., “Preparation N-F-codoped TiO2 nanorod array by liquid phase deposition as visible light photocatalyst,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 361–365, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. H. Zhu, B. Yang, J. Xu et al., “Construction of Z-scheme type CdS-Au-TiO2 hollow nanorod arrays with enhanced photocatalytic activity,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 90, no. 3-4, pp. 463–469, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. Wu, B. Yang, Y. Lv et al., “Efficient one-pot synthesis of Ag nanoparticles loaded on N-doped multiphase TiO2 hollow nanorod arrays with enhanced photocatalytic activity,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 256, no. 23, pp. 7125–7130, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. J. Z. Y. Tan, Y. Fernández, D. Liu, M. M. Valer, J. Bian, and X. Zhang, “Photoreduction of CO2 using copper-decorated TiO2 nanorod films with localized surface plasmon behavior,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 531, pp. 149–154, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. Y. Liu, B. Zhou, J. Bai et al., “Efficient photochemical water splitting and organic pollutant degradation by highly ordered TiO2 nanopore arrays,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 89, pp. 142–148, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. P. Hoyer, “Formation of a titanium dioxide nanotube array,” Langmuir, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1411–1413, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. V. Zwilling, E. Darque-Ceretti, A. Boutry-Forveille, D. David, M. Y. Perrin, and M. Aucouturier, “Structure and physicochemistry of anodic oxide films on titanium and TA6V alloy,” Surface and Interface Analysis, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 629–637, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. N. Liu, X. Chen, J. Zhang, and J. W. Schwank, “A review on TiO2-based nanotubes synthesized via hydrothermal method: formation mechanism, structure modification, and photocatalytic applications,” Catalysis Today, vol. 225, pp. 34–51, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. D. Gong, C. A. Grimes, O. K. Varghese et al., “Titanium oxide nanotube arrays prepared by anodic oxidation,” Journal of Materials Research, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 3331–3334, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. D. V. Bavykin, J. M. Friedrich, and F. C. Walsh, “Protonated titanates and TiO2 nanostructured materials: synthesis, properties, and applications,” Advanced Materials, vol. 18, no. 21, pp. 2807–2824, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. T. Peng, A. Hasegawa, J. Qiu, and K. Hirao, “Fabrication of titania tubules with high surface area and well-developed mesostructural walls by surfactant-mediated templating method,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 2011–2016, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. J. H. Jung, H. Kobayashi, K. J. C. van Bommel, S. Shinkai, and T. Shimizu, “Creation of novel helical ribbon and double-layered nanotube TiO2 structures using an organogel template,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1445–1447, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. C. L. Wong, Y. N. Tan, and A. R. Mohamed, “A review on the formation of titania nanotube photocatalysts by hydrothermal treatment,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 92, no. 7, pp. 1669–1680, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. T. Kasuga, M. Hiramatsu, A. Hoson, T. Sekino, and K. Niihara, “Formation of titanium oxide nanotube,” Langmuir, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 3160–3163, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. X. Chen, S. Cao, X. Weng, H. Wang, and Z. Wu, “Effects of morphology and structure of titanate supports on the performance of ceria in selective catalytic reduction of NO,” Catalysis Communications, vol. 26, pp. 178–182, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. B. K. Vijayan, N. M. Dimitrijevic, J. Wu, and K. A. Gray, “The effects of Pt doping on the structure and visible light photoactivity of titania nanotubes,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 114, no. 49, pp. 21262–21269, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. Z. Tang, F. Li, Y. Zhang, X. Fu, and Y. J. Xu, “Composites of titanate nanotube and carbon nanotube as photocatalyst with high mineralization ratio for gas-phase degradation of volatile aromatic pollutant,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 115, no. 16, pp. 7880–7886, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. R. Yuan, B. Zhou, D. Hua, and C. Shi, “Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of humic acids using Al and Fe co-doped TiO2 nanotubes under UV/ozonation for drinking water purification,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 262, pp. 527–538, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. J. Kang, D. Aasi, and Y. Katayama, “Bisphenol A in the aquatic environment and its endocrine-disruptive effects on aquatic organisms,” Critical Reviews in Toxicology, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 607–625, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. T. Zhang, X. W. Zhang, X. L. Yan, J. W. Ng, Y. J. Wang, and D. D. Sun, “Removal of bisphenol A via a hybrid process combining oxidation on β-MnO2 nanowires with microfiltration,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, vol. 392, no. 1, pp. 198–204, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. R. A. Doong, S. M. Chang, and C. W. Tsai, “Enhanced photoactivity of Cu-deposited titanate nanotubes for removal of bisphenol A,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 129, pp. 48–55, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. K. Lin, W. Liu, and J. Gan, “Oxidative removal of bisphenol A by manganese dioxide: efficacy, products, and pathways,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 3860–3864, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. Y. Y. Chen, S. M. Zhang, Y. Yu et al., “Synthesis, characterization, and photocatalytic activity of Ndoped TiO2 nanotubes,” Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 245–249, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. H. Tokudome and M. Miyauchi, “N-doped TiO2 nanotube with visible light activity,” Chemistry Letters, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 1108–1109, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. J. C. Xu, M. Lu, X. Y. Guo, and H. L. Li, “Zinc ions surface-doped titanium dioxide nanotubes and its photocatalysis activity for degradation of methyl orange in water,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, vol. 226, pp. 123–127, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. M. Pirilä, R. Lenkkeri, W. M. Goldmann, K. Kordás, M. Huuhtanen, and R. L. Keiski, “Photocatalytic degradation of butanol in aqueous solutions by TiO2 nanofibers,” Topics in Catalysis, vol. 56, no. 9-10, pp. 630–636, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. J. Kirchnerova, M.-L. Herrera Cohen, C. Guy, and D. Klvana, “Photocatalytic oxidation of n-butanol under fluorescent visible light lamp over commercial TiO2 (Hombicat UV100 and Degussa P25),” Applied Catalysis A: General, vol. 282, no. 1-2, pp. 321–332, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. L. Song, J. Xiong, Q. Jiang, P. Du, H. Cao, and X. Shao, “Synthesis and photocatalytic properties of Zn2+ doped anatase TiO2 nanofibers,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 77–81, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. L. Qin, X. Pan, L. Wang, X. Sun, G. Zhang, and X. Guo, “Facile preparation of mesoporous TiO2(B) nanowires with well-dispersed Fe2O3 nanoparticles and their photochemical catalytic behavior,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 150-151, pp. 544–553, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. M. A. Fontecha-Cámaraa, M. A. Álvarez-Merinoa, F. Carrasco-Marínb, M. V. López-Ramóna, and C. Moreno-Castillab, “Heterogeneous and homogeneous Fenton processes using activated carbon for the removal of the herbicide amitrole from water,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 101, pp. 425–430, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. B. Liu, A. Khare, and E. S. Aydil, “TiO2-B/anatase core-shell heterojunction nanowires for photocatalysis,” ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 4444–4450, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. S. Ramasundaram, H. N. Yoo, K. G. Song, J. Lee, K. J. Choi, and S. W. Hong, “Titanium dioxide nanofibers integrated stainless steel filter for photocatalytic degradation of pharmaceutical compounds,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 258-259, pp. 124–132, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. X. W. Zhang, T. Zhang, J. Ng, and D. D. Sun, “High-performance multifunctional TiO2 nanowire ultrafiltration membrane with a hierarchical layer structure for water treatment,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 19, pp. 3731–3736, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. A. Hu, X. Zhang, K. D. Oakes, P. Peng, Y. N. Zhou, and M. R. Servos, “Hydrothermal growth of free standing TiO2 nanowire membranes for photocatalytic degradation of pharmaceuticals,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 189, no. 1-2, pp. 278–285, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. X. W. Zhang, A. J. Du, P. Lee, D. D. Sun, and J. O. Leckie, “TiO2 nanowire membrane for concurrent filtration and photocatalytic oxidation of humic acid in water,” Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 313, no. 1-2, pp. 44–51, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. Z. L. He, W. X. Que, J. Chen, X. T. Yin, Y. C. He, and J. B. Ren, “Photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange over nitrogen-fluorine codoped TiO2 nanobelts prepared by solvothermal synthesis,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 4, pp. 6815–6825, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  68. N. T. Q. Hoa, Z. Lee, S. H. Kang, V. Radmilovic, and E. T. Kim, “Synthesis and ferromagnetism of Co-doped TiO(2-delta) nanobelts by metallorganic chemical vapor deposition,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 92, no. 12, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. P. Gao, D. Bao, Y. Wang et al., “Epitaxial growth route to crystalline TiO2 nanobelts with optimizable electrochemical performance,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 2, pp. 368–373, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  70. J. Lin, J. Shen, T. Wang et al., “Enhancement of photocatalytic properties of TiO2 nanobelts through surface-coarsening and surface nanoheterostructure construction,” Materials Science and Engineering B, vol. 176, pp. 921–925, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. J. Zhang, W. Liu, X. Wang, B. Hu, and H. Liu, “Enhanced decoloration activity by Cu2O@TiO2 nanobelts heterostructures via a strong adsorption-weak photodegradation process,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 282, pp. 84–91, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. J. Tian, Y. Sang, Z. Zhao et al., “Enhanced photocatalytic performances of CeO2/TiO2 nanobelt heterostructures,” Small, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 3864–3872, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. R. Liang, A. Hu, W. J. Li, and Y. N. Zhou, “A chemical approach to accurately characterize the coverage rate of gold nanoparticles,” Journal of Nanoparticle Research, vol. 15, p. 1900, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. M. A. Khan, H. Jung, and O. B. Yang, “Synthesis and characterization of ultrahigh crystalline TiO2 nanotubes,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 110, no. 13, pp. 6626–6630, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. L. Li, X. Qin, G. Wang, L. Qi, G. Du, and Z. Hu, “Synthesis of anatase TiO2 nanowires by modifying TiO2 nanoparticles using the microwave heating method,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 257, no. 18, pp. 8006–8012, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. J. Lee, Y. Lee, H. Song, D. Jang, and Y. Choa, “Synthesis and characterization of TiO2 nanowires with controlled porosity and microstructure using electrospinning method,” Current Applied Physics, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. S210–S214, 2011. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Ting Feng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.