Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Photoenergy

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 670438, 5 pages
Research Article

SiO2 Antireflection Coatings Fabricated by Electron-Beam Evaporation for Black Monocrystalline Silicon Solar Cells

1School of Electrical Engineering, Guangdong Mechanical & Electrical College, Guangzhou 510515, China

2Institute for Solar Energy Systems, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Photovoltaic Technologies, State Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Materials and Technologies, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China

3Key Laboratory of Automobile Components and Vehicle Technology in Guangxi, Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou 545006, China

Received 1 May 2014; Revised 14 July 2014; Accepted 18 July 2014; Published 17 August 2014

Academic Editor: Tao Xu

Copyright © 2014 Minghua Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


In this work we prepared double-layer antireflection coatings (DARC) by using the SiO2/SiNx:H heterostructure design. SiO2 thin films were deposited by electron-beam evaporation on the conventional solar cell with SiNx:H single-layer antireflection coatings (SARC), while to avoid the coverage of SiO2 on the front side busbars, a steel mask was utilized as the shelter. The thickness of the SiNx:H as bottom layer was fixed at 80 nm, and the varied thicknesses of the SiO2 as top layer were 105 nm and 122 nm. The results show that the SiO2/SiNx:H DARC have a much lower reflectance and higher external quantum efficiency (EQE) in short wavelengths compared with the SiNx:H SARC. A higher energy conversion efficiency of 17.80% was obtained for solar cells with SiO2 (105 nm)/SiNx:H (80 nm) DARC, an absolute conversion efficiency increase of 0.32% compared with the conventional single SiNx:H-coated cells.

1. Introduction

For high-efficiency solar cells, antireflection coating (ARC) is very important for improving the performance of solar cells since it ensures a high photocurrent output by minimizing incident light reflectance on the top surface [14]. At present, hydrogen containing silicon nitride (SiNx:H) thin film deposited by plasma enhanced chemical vapour deposition (PECVD) is widely used as ARC and passivation layer for crystalline silicon solar cells [5, 6]. However, the single-layer antireflection coatings (SARC) used in silicon solar cells still cause considerable optical reflectance loss in a broad range of the solar spectrum. Therefore, double-layer antireflection coatings (DARC) which consist of heterostructure materials such as MgF2/ZnS [3, 7], MgF2/BN [8], Al2O3/TiO2 [911], and MgF2/CeO2 [12] are considered to be a more effective design in decreasing the reflection in a broad wavelength range for the high efficiency solar cells fabrication. These DARC are not common because of process complexity, which could affect their mass production process. Though SiNx:H/SiNx:H [13] shows unique combination of good electronic and optical properties, it has disadvantages of high absorption in the UV region reducing of the short-circuit current of the cell. The SiO2/SiNx:H DARC are a promising design to improve solar cells efficiency due to its advantages in both surface passivation and antireflection properties. The simulation on the SiO2/SiNx:H DARC was carried out by optimizing their refractive index and film thickness [14]. Kim et al. [15] have investigated the conversion efficiency improvement of monocrystalline silicon solar cell with double layer antireflection coating consisting of SiO2/SiNx:H deposited by PECVD. And the solar cells with DARC showed the better efficiency as 17.57% and 17.76%, compared with 17.45% for single SiNx:H ARC.

In this paper, we present a novel process method that DARC consisting of SiNx:H and SiO2 films were deposited via PECVD and an electron-beam evaporation technique, respectively. The thickness of SiNx:H films as the bottom layer is kept at 80 nm, which is optimum for SARC. By simply varying the thickness of the SiO2 layer as the top layer covering the conventional solar cell, monocrystalline silicon solar cells with different SiO2/SiNx:H DARC are fabricated.

2. Experiment

Boron doped monocrystalline wafers, with a thickness of 160 μm, a size of 125 mm × 125 mm, and a resistivity in the range of 1~3 Ωcm, have been used for all experiments. After standard cleaning and alkaline texturization, a standard POCl3 emitter diffusion in a quartz tube led to a sheet resistivity of 60 Ω/. The wafers were coated with a SiNx:H layer in a PECVD (Centrotherm) system. The refractive index of SiNx:H was adjusted by controlling the NH3/SiH4 gas flow ratio. The thickness of the SiNx:H layer was 80 nm. After a standard front and back side screen printing process, the contact formation was performed by a firing through process. Then, the solar cells with SiNx:H SARC were performed. To prepare the SiO2/SiNx:H DARC, SiO2 thin films were deposited on the prepared solar cell with SiNx:H SARC by electron-beam evaporation. Considering of the SiO2 layer on busbars may lead to contact issue in I-V test, we used steel mask on the top of busbars as shelter during e-beam evaporation. High purity SiO2 (99.99%) granules were used as the source material for evaporation and the source-to-substrate distance was 50 cm. The substrates temperature was controlled at 200°C. High purity oxygen (99.99%) was introduced into the chamber to maintain a pressure of 3.0 × 10−2 Pa and used as reactive gas during the deposition. The deposition rate was controlled using a quartz crystal sensor placed near the substrate, and set as ~2 Å/s. The thicknesses of the SiO2 as top layer were 105 nm and 122 nm, respectively. Finally, the solar cells with different SiO2/SiNx:H coatings were obtained. The structure of the solar cell with SiO2/SiNx:H DARC is schematically shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Schematic of the solar cell with SiO2/SiNx:H DARC.

The Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) measurement for the SiO2 thin film has been made at 25°C using a Thermo Nicolet 6700 FTIR spectrometer. The refractive index of the SiNx:H and SiO2 films were measured by a n&k analyzer 1200. Spectral reflectance and external quantum efficiency (EQE) measurements were performed by a solar cell spectral response measurement system (PV measurement, QEX7). In addition, the I-V characteristics of the solar cells were measured using a Berger I-V tester on a solar cell production line. All measurements were conducted under the standard test conditions (AM1.5G spectrum, 100 mW/cm2, 25°C). Prior to the measurements, the simulator was calibrated with a reference monocrystalline silicon solar cell, which was calibrated by the Fraunhofer ISE. All electrical parameters are presented as the average value of ten cells in the study.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. SiO2 Thin Film Characterization

XPS was applied to determine the chemical state of the Si and O elements, which can confirm the presence of SiO2 layer in DARC. XPS analysis for SiO2 film has been reported in our group [16].

In order to get a qualitative spectra of SiO2 thin film compositions, we have performed Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis. The samples were prepared on the aluminium thin film with 300 nm thickness on the glass substrate, which deposited by e-beam evaporation. We adopt reflection method to measure the sample. The spectra are presented in Figure 2. The band in the 1040–1150 cm−1 range is assigned to the stretching vibration mode Si–O [17, 18]. For the supplement of oxygen during the SiO2 deposition, a clear increase of Si–O intensity peak (1020 cm−1) is observed for the SiO2 layer, which is related to the high oxygen content in this layer.

Figure 2: FTIR transmission spectra of SiO2 thin film.
3.2. Optical Property

The color of the solar cell depends heavily on thickness of its ARC-layer. Figures 3(a) and 3(b) show the photographs of silicon solar cells with single SiNx:H SARC and SiO2 (105 nm)/SiNx:H (80 nm) DARC, respectively. Two kinds of coatings have good uniformity. It is notable that the front surface color of the solar cells changed from dark blue to black, indicating that there was a lower reflectance loss in the DARC, as shown in Figure 3(b).

Figure 3: Photographs of monocrystalline silicon solar cells with (a) SiNx:H (80 nm) SARC and (b) SiO2 (105 nm)/SiNx:H (80 nm) DARC.

The reflectance spectrum was measured to characterize the reflectance loss. Figure 4 depicts the reflectance spectra of solar cells with SiO2/SiNx:H DARC and SiNx:H SARC, respectively. Compared with the SiNx:H SARC, SiO2/SiNx:H layer stacks show lower reflectance in the range 300–450 nm. The amorphous SiO2 coating is transparent in the measured wavelength range. It is obvious that the reflectance of the SiNx:H layer stack is dependent on the thickness of the SiO2 coatings. With the thickness of SiO2 in the SiO2/SiNx:H stack increasing, the reflectance changes correspondingly. A similar simulation trend was also reported by Aguilar et al. [19]. In our work, the lowest reflectance was obtained while the thickness of SiO2 was 105 nm in the SiO2/SiNx:H stack, which is nearly consistent with previous simulation results. The value of calculated weighted reflectance is 1.72%.

Figure 4: Reflectance curve for the single-layer ARC and double-layer ARC samples.

It is acknowledged that a reduction in light of around 30% resulted from the reflectance at the Si and air interface [20]. ARC means an optically thin dielectric layer designed to suppress reflection by interference effects. By using DARC with λ/4 design, with growing indices from air to silicon, the minimum in reflection is broader in wavelength range. The measured refractive indices of SiNx:H and SiO2 were 2.1 and 1.46 at 633 nm wavelength, respectively. Thus, the optimal thickness for each layer in term of their refractive indices can be obtained.

EQE data was collected for wavelengths in the range of 300–1100 nm to determine the spectral response of the solar cells, as shown in Figure 5(a); no significant differences in the infrared wavelength range were observed among these cells. On the other hand, the EQE of cells with DARC is higher than that with SiNx:H SARC in the range 300–450 nm wavelength. It was also shown that SiO2 (105 nm)/SiNx:H (80 nm) stack coatings has the highest improvement in short wavelength. IQE data was collected for wavelengths in the range of 300–1100 nm, as shown in Figure 5(b); EQE and IQE curves have the similar trends.

Figure 5: EQE and IQE of the single layer ARC and double layer ARC solar cells.
3.3. Solar Cell Results

The solar cells fabricated with novel SiO2/SiNx:H stacks were tested and compared to conventional solar cells with SiNx:H SARC, as shown in Table 1. All data in Table 1 are the average values of ten samples. With the thickness of SiO2 thin films varied, the conversion efficiency of the cells changed. Table 1 shows the conversion efficiency of the cells with SiO2 (105 nm)/SiNx:H (80 nm) DARC reached 17.80%, which was 0.32% (absolute) higher than solar cells with SiNx:H SARC. The fill factor of each group is nearly the same, while the shows small degradation for solar cells, which probably caused by the surface damages during the e-beam evaporation.

Table 1: Summary of the average electrical parameters of the different ARC stacks compared with :H SARC solar cells (AM1.5G, 100 mW/cm2, 25°C).

Correspondingly, the highest short-circuit current density () was also obtained. It is demonstrated that the conversion efficiency of cells with DARC is dependent on the thickness of SiO2 coatings, the same as the dependence of reflectance and EQE. Figure 6 shows the J-V characteristic of the solar cell with SiO2 (105 nm)/SiNx:H (80 nm) DARC.

Figure 6: J-V characteristics of the solar cell with SiO2 (105 nm)/SiNx:H (80 nm) DARC (AM1.5 G, 100 mW/cm2, 25°C).

4. Conclusions

In this work, SiO2/SiNx:H DARC were deposited on monocrystalline silicon solar cells. The results show that the SiO2/SiNx:H DARC have a lower reflectance compared with the SiNx:H SARC. Accordingly, solar cells with SiO2/SiNx:H DARC exhibit a higher EQE and IQE in the short wavelengths of 300–450 nm. Due to current density improvement, the conversion efficiency of 17.80% was obtained for solar cells with DARC, 0.32% (absolute) higher than that of cells with single SiNx:H coatings.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


This work was funded by the Building Fund (no. 13-051-38) and Opening Project (nos. 2012KFMS04 and 2013KFM01) of Guangxi Key Laboratory of Automobile Components and Vehicle Technology. This work was also funded by the talent introduction project of Guangdong Mechanical & Electrical College. The authors would like to thank Ms. Qianzhi Zhang (Instrumental Analysis & Research Center, Sun Yat-sen University) for her help with FTIR measurement.


  1. M. A. Green, “Third generation photovoltaics: ultra-high conversion efficiency at low cost,” Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 123–135, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. J. Yoo, S. K. Dhungel, and J. Yi, “Properties of plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposited silicon nitride for the application in multicrystalline silicon solar cells,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 515, no. 12, pp. 5000–5003, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. Bouhafs, A. Moussi, A. Chikouche, and J. M. Ruiz, “Design and simulation of antireflection coating systems for optoelectronic devices: application to silicon solar cells,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 52, no. 1-2, pp. 79–93, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S.-C. Chiao, J.-L. Zhou, and H. A. Macleod, “Optimized design of an antireflection coating for textured silicon solar cells,” Applied Optics, vol. 32, no. 28, pp. 5557–5560, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. B. Swatowska and T. Stapinski, “Amorphous hydrogenated silicon-nitride films for applications in solar cells,” Vacuum, vol. 82, no. 10, pp. 942–946, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. G. Aberle, “Overview on SiN surface passivation of crystalline silicon solar cells,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 239–248, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. Zhao, A. Wang, P. Altermatt, and M. A. Green, “Twenty-four percent efficient silicon solar cells with double layer antireflection coatings and reduced resistance loss,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 66, no. 26, pp. 3636–3638, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. Alemu, A. Freundlich, N. Badi, C. Boney, and A. Bensaoula, “Low temperature deposited boron nitride thin films for a robust anti-reflection coating of solar cells,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 921–923, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. J. Aiken, “High performance anti-reflection coatings for broadband multi-junction solar cells,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 393–404, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. J. Daniel, “Antireflection coating design for series interconnected multi-junction solar cells,” Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Application, vol. 8, pp. 563–570, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. B. G. Lee, J. Skarp, V. Malinen, S. Li, S. Choi, and H. M. Branz, in Proceedings of the IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, Austin, Tex, USA, 2012.
  12. S. E. Lee, S. W. Choi, and J. Yi, “Double-layer anti-reflection coating using MgF2 and CeO2 films on a crystalline silicon substrate,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 376, no. 1-2, pp. 208–213, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. Y. Lee, D. Gong, N. Balaji, Y.-J. Lee, and J. Yi, “Stability of SiNx/SiNx double stack antireflection coating for single crystalline silicon solar cells,” Nanoscale Research Letters, vol. 7, article 50, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. P. Doshi, G. E. Jellison Jr., and A. Rohatgi, “Characterization and optimization of absorbing plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposited antireflection coatings for silicon photovoltaics,” Applied Optics, vol. 36, no. 30, pp. 7826–7837, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. Kim, J. Park, J. H. Hong et al., “Double antireflection coating layer with silicon nitride and silicon oxide for crystalline silicon solar cell,” Journal of Electroceramics, vol. 30, no. 1-2, pp. 41–45, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Li, L. Zeng, Y. Chen, L. Zhuang, X. Wang, and H. Shen, “Realization of colored multicrystalline silicon solar cells with SiO2/SiNx:H double layer antireflection coatings,” International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 2013, Article ID 352473, 8 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. P. V. Bulkin, P. L. Swart, B. M. Lacquet, and J. Non-Cryst, “Effect of process parameters on the properties of electron cyclotron resonance plasma deposited silicon-oxynitride,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 187, pp. 403–408, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  18. S. K. Ghosh and T. K. Hatwar, “Preparation and characterization of reactively sputtered silicon nitride thin films,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 166, no. C, pp. 359–366, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. Aguilar, Y. Matsumoto, G. Romero, and M. Alfredo Reyes, “Optical mismatch in double AR coated c-Si, a simple theoretical and experimental correlation,” in Proceddings of the 3rd World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, pp. 1001–1004, Osaka, Japan, May 2003. View at Scopus
  20. A. Luque and S. Hegedus, Handbook of Photovoltaic Science and Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 2003.