International Journal of Polymer Science

International Journal of Polymer Science / 2020 / Article
Special Issue

Natural-Based Nanocomposites and their Biomedical Applications

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 6727132 |

Mohamed E. EL-Hefnawy, "Biodegradable Films from Phytosynthesized TiO2 Nanoparticles and Nanofungal Chitosan as Probable Nanofertilizers", International Journal of Polymer Science, vol. 2020, Article ID 6727132, 7 pages, 2020.

Biodegradable Films from Phytosynthesized TiO2 Nanoparticles and Nanofungal Chitosan as Probable Nanofertilizers

Academic Editor: Ehsan N. Zare
Received04 Jul 2020
Revised07 Aug 2020
Accepted25 Aug 2020
Published07 Sep 2020


Titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2-NPs) have great importance for plant nutrition and growth, at little concentrations. The bioactive polymer chitosan and its NPs provide outstanding characteristics for capping and enhancements of nanometals. The phytosynthesis of TiO2-NPswas promisingly achieved using an extract of pomegranate rind, whereas the fungal chitosan (FCt) was produced from Aspergillus brasiliensis biomass and was transformed to nanoform. The phytosynthesis of TiO2-NPs generated homogenous spherical particles with 13 to 64 nm range and 37 nm mean size. The extracted FCt had 92% deacetylation degree and a molecular weight of 28,400 Da. The infrared spectral analysis of TiO2-NPs, FCt-NPs, and their nanocomposite indicated their functional groups and biochemical interactions. The released amounts of TiO2-NPs from their nanocomposite with FCt–NPs were 31% and 50% after the first and third hour, respectively. The nanocomposite film had a faster hydrodegradability rate which resulted from TiO2-NP addition. Therefore, the fabricated nanocomposite from FCt/TiO2-NPs could have elevated potentiality for application as liquid spray for foliar feeding or as powder for soil amendment.

1. Introduction

Titanium (Ti) element has important biological consequence for plants, being advantageous at lower concentrations and potentially toxic at higher ones, but with miniature toxicity toward animals or human [1]. Whereas TiO2 antimicrobial potentiality was reported against many microorganisms [2, 3], it has many beneficial consequences for plant physiological attributes, especially at little dosages (the Ti contents in plant dry weight ranged from 1 to 1000 mg/kg with profitable application range of up to 100 mg/L), including their elemental contents, biomass yield, chlorophyll contents, and foliar growth [46].

Nanofertilizers emerged as promising candidates for enhancing micronutrients’ uptake efficiency; their successful practical applications promoted the search for more systems to improve their delivery, e.g., nanocarriers and nanocomposites [7, 8]. Formulated nanofertilizers could have slower release of nutrients, which improves their usage, solubility, bioavailability, and dispersion [7]. Compared to traditional fertilizers, nanofertilizers could be absorbed by crops easily, with sustained nutrient delivery into soil/plant [8].

While numerous metals/metal oxide NPs were effectually applied in plant-related sciences (including TiO2, ZnO, AgNO3, Fe3O4, and CeO2), TiO2-NPs represented the most frequently applied nanometals in agricultural investigations [5, 9].

The practical exogenous applications of TiO2-NPs in crop propagation indicated their efficacy for enhancing plant performance, biomass production, photo-reduction activities, and nitrogen assimilation [10, 11]. Moreover, these micronutrient NPs could protect chloroplast membranes from rеactivе oxygеn spеcies (ROS) attacking and destruction [4]. TiO2-NPs can also improve other native nutrient utilization via support of beneficial microbial activities [12]. The TiO2-NPs were effectually phytosynthesized (synthesis enforced by plant derivatives) using extract of various parts of plants [1315], which was advised for increasing the process safety, feasibility, and efficiency.

The biosynthesis (green synthesis) of nanomaterials has recently become a key method for preparation of many bioactive NPs with augmented activity and reduced toxicity during their preparation and applications; the synthesis could be enforced by NPs incorporation with numerous types of biopolymers [1618].

Biosynthesized nanometals and nanocompounds were validated as effectual and powerful antimicrobial agents in biomedical fields and their successful applications were proved [1921].

The extract of pomegranate rinds (PRE), as a byproduct with plenty of valuable phytochemicals and biological activities, was employed for the green phytosynthesis of many metal NPs including silver, iron, and zinc [2224], as the PRE exhibited strong reducing capability for these metals.

Chitosan (Cts), the astonishing derived amino polysaccharide from chitin deacetylation, possesses plentiful advantageous attributes (e.g., its biosafety, biodegradability, biocompatibility, nontoxicity, and efficacious bioactivities) [25]. The extraction of Cts from different fungal biomasses was promisingly achieved [26, 27]; this fungal chitosan (FCt) had comparable or superior bioactivities than commercial Cts from crustacean shells.

The polymer NPs, particularly from Cts and FCt, are well proved for their surplus functionalities and bioactivities as nanocarriers, biochelators, antimicrobial, biosorbent, and plant protectant agents, in individual or composited forms with other bioactive compounds and nanomaterials [2830].

The application of Cts and FCt-NPs was advised for soil and water remediation from heavy metals due to their capabilities for heavy metal chelation/adsorption [28, 29].

The incorporation of TiO2 with Cts was reported to improve the composite structural, mechanical, optical, textural, vapor barring, and thermal properties and its biodegradability [31]. These composites had also augmented antimicrobial, viscoelastic, and biocompatibility attributes [3, 32, 33].

Accordingly, the intentions from this investigation were to phytosynthesize TiO2-NPs using PRE, extract FCt from grown mycelia of Aspergillus brasiliensis and transform it to NP form, then to conjugate both NPs for augmenting their release pattern and hydrodegradability.

2. Materials and Method

2.1. Pomegranate Rinds’ Extract (PRE) Preparation

Organic pomegranate fruits (Punica granatum L.), obtained from international markets in KSA, Jeddah, were used in study. Fruits were disinfected (using 5% sodium hypochlorite solution) and peeled and their rinds were dried (for 50 h at °C) and ground to 60-mesh powder size. The PRE was prepared through powder immersion for 36 h in ethanol (70%) with agitation then filtration to have the extract, which was vacuum dried at 42°C and resuspended in deionized water (DIW) to have 10%() concentration [34].

2.2. Phytosynthesis of TiO2 Nanoparticles

Titanium (IV) chloride (TiCl4, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO; %) was the precursor for TiO2-NP phytosynthesis.

For TiO2-NP phytosynthesis, 50 mL of TiCl4 solution in DIW (95 mg/mL) was mixed with equal volume of PRE with strong stirring for 60 min at °C. The changing solution color to whitish-brown indicated TiO2-NP synthesis. Ammonium hydroxide solution (0.2 M) was slowly added to NP solution under stirring at °C, until reaching alkaline pH of 8.0 and precipitate formation. The precipitated TiO2-NPs were collected via centrifugation (at 8600°g), washed with ethanol (95%), recentrifuged, and calcined at °C for 200 min, then powdered finely.

2.3. Preparation of Fungal Chitosan/TiO2-NP Composite

Grown mycelia of Aspergillus brasiliensis (ATCC-16404), after aerobic propagation in broth media of potato dextrose (containing infusion of 200 g potato+20 g dextrose/L), were used as chitosan source by extraction according to Tayel et al. [26]. Briefly, inoculated fungal conidial suspension (106 spores/mL), in 500 mL of broth medium, were incubated aerobically under stirring (120 g) for 6 days at 28°C.The FCt extraction involved fungal biomass harvesting and washing with DIW, treatment with 20 folds () from 1 M of NaOH then HCl and finally deacetylation by treatment with 20 folds from 60% () NaOH solution for 60 min at 110°C.

Thе molеcular wеight of FCt was dеtermined by gеl pеrmeation chromatography (GPC) with thе following spеcifications: GPC (PN-3000), together with a refractive index detector (PN-1000) from Post-nova analytics, Eresing, Germany, was operated at15°C and 90°C. Thе usеd columns for dеtection werе Nuclеogel GFC 1000-8 (Machеrey-Nagеl GmbH & Co. KG, Dürеn, Gеrmany) and Gral300 by (Polymеr Standards Sеrvicе GmbH, Mainz, Gеrmany). Standard pullulans (with molеcular wеight of 11,800, 47,300, 112,000, and 780,000) wеrе usеd for calibration.

The calculation of FCt deacetylation degree (DD) was based on its infrared spectral analysis using FTIR (Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopic -FTS 45, Bio-Rad, Germany), using the absorbance ratios at A1655/A3450.2.4.

The FCt-NP synthesis employed ionotropic gelation method (based on the electrostatical interaction of positively charged FCt molecules with the negatively charged pentasodium tripolyphosphate “Na-TPP”, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo.); FCt solution (0.5% ) in 1.5% acidic solution (CH₃COOH, Sigma-Aldrich) was prepared and sonicated at 50 W for 20 min (Braun-Labsonic, Germany). Equal volume from Na-TPP solution (of 0.5% in DIW) was slowly dropped into stirred FCt solution, then resonicated and centrifuged (at 8400 × for 25 min). The obtained FCt-NP pellet was sonicated after suspension in DIW and recentrifuged [29].

Later, 500 mg of FCt-NPs (dissolved in 50 mL of 1.5% acetic acid solution) and 50 mg from TiO2-NPs (dispersed in 5 mL of DIW) were combined and then sonicated for 30 min. The uniform composite emulsion was further magnetically stirred for 250 min to enforce NP crosslinkage [3].

2.4. Characterization of Synthesized Nanoparticles

The FTIR spectroscopy was employed for analyzing the functional groups of NPs and nanocomposite (TiO2-NPs, FCt-NPs, and FCt/TiO2-NPs) at a wavenumber range of 550-4000 cm-1, after integration of NPs with 1% KBr. The TiO2-NP size distribution and charges were estimated via PCS (photon correlation spectroscopy, Malvern™ Zetasizer, Malvern, UK), and their structure was further confirmed via TEM (transmission electron microscopy; Leica™ Leo0430, Cambridge Ltd., UK). The surface morphology and appearance of the nanocomposite were screened using SEM imaging (scanning electron microscopy, JEOL JSM-IT100, Tokyo, Japan).

2.5. TiO2-NP Release from FCt Nanoconjugates

The dispersed TiO2-NPs in FCt solution was ultrasonicated for 120 min and dispensed onto Petri plates; then, their solvent (acidified DIW, pH 5.2) was vacuum evaporated for 16 h. The dried formed films were peeled and immersed in 50 folds () from neutral DIW, which were agitated at 320 × , and 10 mL from the supernatants was gathered for 180 min, with 30 min intervals. Samples were analyzed for Ti content according to Korn et al. [35], involving treatment with 40 folds () from concentrated hydrofluoric (50%) and sulfuric (98%) acids then dilution with 3% HNO3 and ion determination using ICP (inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer, OES-5110, Agilent Inc. Santa Clara, CA).Thе еxpеrimеnts wеrе pеrformеd in triplicatе and thеir mеan valuеs wеrе calculatеd.

2.6. Hydrolytic Degradation of NPs-Based Films

The hydrolytic degradation percentage of NPs-based films (FCt-NP and FCt/TiO2-NP composites) was pеrformеd in triplicatе at °Cfor 10 h, with 60 min intervals, using  mm film squares. The NP films were immersed in neutral DIW, with slow stirring, for each interval time; then, they were attained via filtration to disregard DIW and dissolved materials. The residual films were vacuum dried and weighed to assess their mass loss [36].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. TiO2-NP Phytosynthesis Using PRE

The TiO2-NPs could be successfully synthesized using PRE, as evidenced from their characterization (Figure 1). The phytosynthesized TiO2-NPs appeared with spherical and matched shapes with slight NP agglomerations (Figure 1(a)). The TiO2-NP size distribution ranged from 13.42 to 63.84 nm, with 34.21 nm median size and 36.71 nm mean size (Figure 1(b)). The recorded Zeta potential average for these phytosynthesized TiO2-NPs was –24.8 mV.

Numerous bioactive compounds are contained in PRE, including polyphenols, vitamins, flavonoids, esters, and protein. The polyphenols, vitamin C, and many other phytoconstituents contain extensive hydroxyl groups with strong reducing capability [22]. PRE was acknowledged to contain extraordinarily elevated phenolic compounds as natural antioxidants sources [37]. Thus, these biactive phytoconstituents are assumingly the one responsible for reducing TiO2 to their NP form.

The PPE was effectively employed for the phytosynthesis of many metal nanoparticles, e.g., silver, gold, and zinc [22, 23, 38]; this is matching with its capability forTiO2-NP synthesis in current study.

3.2. Fungal Chitosan Extraction

The chitosan was effectually extracted from A. brasiliensis mycelia; the extracted FCt had a molecular weight of 28,400 Da with 92.1% deacetylation degree.

The successfulness of FCt extraction from A. brasiliensis confirmed foregoing investigations that reported the fungi potentialities as sustainable alternative sources for Cts production [26, 28, 29, 39]; these reports applied the extracted FCt, from varied fungal genera, in the environmental and biomedical fields.

3.3. Nanoparticle Characterization

The FTIR spеctral еvaluation was conducted for FCt-NPs, TiO2-NPs, and their nanocomposite (FCt/TiO2-NPs) to appraise their biochemical bonds and the potential interaction/crosslinkage between the synthesized NPs. For TiO2-NP spectra (Figure 2, TiO2-NPs), the representative broad peak of Ti–O–Ti stretching was detected around 612 cm-1 wavenumber. The appeared vibrated bands at 1107 and 1120 cm-1 are specified the stretching/bending modes of CH3 and Ti–OH, respectively, of the NPs surface groups [40].

The sharp peak (at 1638 cm-1) and the broad peak (at 3405 cm-1) are mainly attributed to the NP adsorbed water and occurrence of hydroxyl groups, respectively [14]. The hydroxyl groups’ presence is commonly involving the photocatalytic activity augmentations; with the increased amount of OH− on TiO2-NP surface, their higher electron transportability and enhanced photocatalytic activity could be assumed [41].

The appeared peak at 651 cm−1 in TiO2-NP spectrum conceivably indicated the involvement of Ti anatase phase in phytosynthesized NPs; this phase could be further confirmed via X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses. Conversely, the disappearance of any peaks around 2900 cm−1, which indicates C−H stretching, validated that subtraction of the entire PRE organic components from the TiO2-NP sample during their calcination [14].

For FCt-NP spectrum (Figure 2, Cts-NPs), the strong wide peak around 3453 cm-1 could correspond to combined O–H stretching and hydrogen bonding; the peak wideness with increased intensity could indicate hydrogen bonding enhancement after NP synthesis [30]. The FCt-NP spectrum displayed also (at 1171 cm–1) a sharp indicating peak for P=O, due to crosslinkage of FCt with TPP. The main characteristic absorption peaks of FCt were detected at 1714 cm-1 (C=O carbonyl stretching within the secondary amide I band), at 1541 and 1322 cm−1 (the bending vibration of N–H in amide II and the amide III absorption, respectively), and at 1083 cm-1 (due to C–O–C stretching).

For FCt/TiO2-NPs, the appeared peak at 1391 cm-1 indicates the CH3 band stretching vibrations in the nanocomposite [32, 33], and the TiO2-NP incorporation had obvious impact on the intensities of characteristic peaks (Figure 2, Cts/TiO2-NPs).

The nanocomposite spectrum displayed many characteristic bands and peaks from both FCt-NPs and TiO2-NPs (designated by the vertical lines on the figure). The Ti–O band within 550–700 cm-1 range designated TiO2 immobilization onto FCt matrix [42]. Compared with pure FCt-NP spectrum, many corresponding bands to amino, hydroxyl, and amide groups were shifted in FCt/TiO2-NP composite spectrum; these IR shifts confirmed the interaction between both the conjugated NPs.

The composited FCt/TiO2-NP microstructure and morphology were elucidated using SEM imaging (Figure 3); they appeared with homogenized spherical shapes with some aggregation due to polymer collapse. The TiO2-NPs were mostly capped with FCt-NPs and composed uniform mixtures, as was formerly reported [33, 42]. The low aggregate size in the nanocomposites is assumingly attributive to the organic nature of FCt that could hinder the aggregation of TiO2-NPs [43].

3.4. Release Pattern of TiO2-NPs from FCt–NP Nanocomposite

The release pattern of TiO2-NPs from their nanocomposite with FCt–NPs is performed throughout 180 min releasing time (Figure 4); the released TiO2 amounts from the nanocomposite were 31.2% after the first hour and reached 50.2% at the experiment end. The release pattern TiO2-NPs and its influence with stirring time was indicated from other colloids, cream, and sunscreen [44, 45]; the TiO2 release percentages in these studies were higher than the obtained values in a current study, which indicate the high capability of FCt-NPs for entrapping and capping the TiO2-NPs and preventing them from disintegration. The main suggested factor for TiO2-NP releasing could be the degradation of FCt-based film that assists the liberation of capped metal NPs.

The controlled release of TiO2-NPs, via their conjugation with FCt-NPs, is highly important for sustained fortification of plants with Ti ions for longer times and required concentrations [12, 46].

Many patents and inventions advocated TiO2-NP applications in plant fertilization purposes, either as liquid or colloidal compositions, which could promote foliar and root growth [6, 12]; this supports the potential application of current fabricated FCt/TiO2-NP composites as sustained and controlled source of Ti ions for plant fertilization. In addition, the controlled release of Ti, via incorporation in FCt/TiO2-NP composites, could be highly beneficial for providing the plant with this essential element without its potential toxicity at higher doses [6]. The sustained release of TiO2-NPs could, additionally, provide advantageous long-lasting antimicrobial potentiality against the pathogenic microbial communities in treated soils [2, 3], whereas the application of TiO2-NP fertilizers was statеd to havе no еffеct on thе community structurе of еithеr rhizobia or arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi that colonized plant roots, at any concеntration [47]. This expected antimicrobial power from FCt/TiO2-NPs could have influential consequences to protect soils and plants from pathogenic microbes.

3.5. Hydrolytic Degradation Patterns of Nanocomposed Films

The hydrolytic degradation patterns of composed films from FCt–NPs and FCt/TiO2-NPs are illustrated in Figure 5. Both NPs-based films were gradually degraded and lost their weights with prolongation of experiments; the FCt/TiO2-NPs-based film showed faster degradation than FCt–NPs-based film. The FCt/TiO2-NP film completely degraded after 7 h of treatment, whereas the FCt–NPs film lost 67.4% of its weight at this time and its degradation percentage was 93.2% after 10 h of treatment (Figure 5).

The degradation rate of FCt/TiO2-NPs-based film could be correlated with TiO2-NP release from this nanocomposite, as the degradation rate was 42.8% after 3 h and the liberated TiO2-NPs was slightly higher than this percentage, at the same time. The excess liberated amounts from the nanopolymer composite are assumingly due to decreased electrostatic bonds between them and electron exchanges within the nanocomposite after its hydrolytic destabilization [36, 48].

Theoretically, TiO2-containing films are assumed to have a slower rate of degradation because of the antimicrobial action of TiO2-NPs that can retard microbial degradation of composited films [48], but the composed films from the PLA/TiO2 composite exhibited greatly higher hydrolytic degradation rate than films from PLA resin [36]; this increased degradability of TiO2-incorporated films was attributed to the photodegradation properties of TiO2-NPs, which is activated by NP exposure to UV and visible lights and lead to faster degradation of their composited films [36, 49]. These harmonized results with ours could advocate the incorporation of TiO2-NPs into nanocomposites to control their hydrodegradability [42]. Additionally, the improvement in the biodegradability of chitosan/TiO2 hybrid composite was reported as a TiO2 dose dependent [31, 48], which advocates further experiments to specify the exact optimum TiO2-NPs for controlling films’ degradability.

However, the fabricated nanocomposite here from FCt/TiO2-NPs could have elevated potentiality for application as liquid spray for foliar feeding or as powder for soil amendment [50].

4. Conclusion

The phytosynthesis of TiO2-NPs was innovatively achieved using PRE and their nanocomposites with FCt-NPs had homogenous organization and miniature sizes. The nanocomposite had a faster hydrodegradability which resulted from TiO2-NP addition, which advocates its application as liquid spray for foliar feeding or as powder for soil amendment. These formulated nanocomposites could be possible candidates for application as nanofertilizers to deliver TiO2-NPs into plants in a controlled manner. However, more investigations are required to judge the practical application of FCt/TiO2-NP nanocomposite as a fertilizer.

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares that he has no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.


This project was funded by the DSR (Deanship of Scientific Research at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, KSA) under grant number G-353-662-1440. The authors, therefore, acknowledge with thanks DSR for the technical and financial support.

Supplementary Materials

The supplementary file includes the graphical abstract. (Supplementary Materials)


  1. F. Ghooshchi, “Influence of titanium and bio-fertilizers on some agronomic and physiological attributes of triticale exposed to cadmium stress,” Global NEST Journal, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 458–463, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  2. S. Yaghoubi, W. Schwietert, and J. P. Mccue, “Biological roles of titanium,” Biological Trace Element Research, vol. 78, no. 1-3, pp. 205–217, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. X. Zhang, G. Xiao, Y. Wang, Y. Zhao, H. Su, and T. Tan, “Preparation of chitosan-TiO2 composite film with efficient antimicrobial activities under visible light for food packaging applications,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 169, pp. 101–107, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. E. Morteza, P. Moaveni, H. A. Farahani, and M. Kiyani, “Study of photosynthetic pigments changes of maize (Zea mays L.) under nano Tio2 spraying at various growth stages,” Springerplus, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. S. C. Capaldi Arruda, A. L. Diniz Silva, R. Moretto Galazzi, R. Antunes Azevedo, and M. A. Zezzi Arruda, “Nanoparticles applied to plant science: a review,” Talanta, vol. 131, pp. 693–705, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. Lyu, X. Wei, J. Chen, C. Wang, X. Wang, and D. Pan, “Titanium as a beneficial element for crop production,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 8, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. R. Naderi and A. Danesh-Shahraki, “Nanofertilizers and their roles in sustainable agriculture,” International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences, vol. 5, no. 19, pp. 2229–2232, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  8. G. N. Rameshaiah, S. Jpallavi, and S. Shabnam, “Nano fertilizers and nano sensors–an attempt for developing smart agriculture,” International Journal of Engineering Research and General Science, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 314–320, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  9. S. Ahmed, M. Ahmad, B. L. Swami, and S. Ikram, “A review on plants extract mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles for antimicrobial applications: a green expertise,” Journal of Advanced Research, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 17–28, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. Mandeh, M. Omidi, and M. Rahaie, “In vitro influences of TiO2 nanoparticles on barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) tissue culture,” Biological Trace Element Research, vol. 150, no. 1-3, pp. 376–380, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. U. Song, M. Shin, G. Lee, J. Roh, Y. Kim, and E. J. Lee, “Functional analysis of TiO2 nanoparticle toxicity in three plant species,” Biological Trace Element Research, vol. 155, no. 1, pp. 93–103, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Janmohammadi, N. Sabaghnia, S. Dashti, and M. Nouraein, “Investigation of foliar application of nano-micronutrientfertilizers and nano-titanium dioxide on some traits of barley,” Biologija, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 148–156, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. V. Patidar and P. Jain, “Green Synthesis of TiO2 Nanoparticle Using Moringa Oleifera Leaf Extract,” International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 470–473, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  14. S. P. Goutam, G. Saxena, V. Singh, A. K. Yadav, R. N. Bharagava, and K. B. Thapa, “Green synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles using leaf extract of Jatropha curcas L. for photocatalytic degradation of tannery wastewater,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 336, pp. 386–396, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. Nadeem, D. Tungmunnithum, C. Hano et al., “The current trends in the green syntheses of titanium oxide nanoparticles and their applications,” Green Chemistry Letters and Reviews, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 492–502, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. P. Makvandi, G. W. Ali, F. Della Sala, W. I. Abdel-Fattah, and A. Borzacchiello, “Biosynthesis and characterization of antibacterial thermosensitive hydrogels based on corn silk extract, hyaluronic acid and nanosilver for potential wound healing,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 223, article 115023, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. P. Makvandi, G. W. Ali, F. Della Sala, W. I. Abdel-Fattah, and A. Borzacchiello, “Hyaluronic acid/corn silk extract based injectable nanocomposite: a biomimetic antibacterial scaffold for bone tissue regeneration,” Materials Science and Engineering: C, vol. 107, article 110195, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. E. N. Zare, P. Makvandi, A. Borzacchiello, F. R. Tay, B. Ashtari, and V. V. T. Padil, “Antimicrobial gum bio-based nanocomposites and their industrial and biomedical applications,” Chemical Communications, vol. 55, no. 99, pp. 14871–14885, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. R. Jamaledin, C. K. Y. Yiu, E. N. Zare et al., “Advances in antimicrobial microneedle patches for combating infections,” Advanced Materials, vol. 32, no. 33, article 2002129, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. C. Y. Wang, P. Makvandi, E. N. Zare, F. R. Tay, and L. N. Niu, “Advances in antimicrobial organic and inorganic nanocompounds in biomedicine,” Advanced Therapeutics, vol. 3, no. 8, article 2000024, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. P. Makvandi, C. Y. Wang, E. N. Zare, A. Borzacchiello, L. N. Niu, and F. R. Tay, “Metal-based nanomaterials in biomedical applications: antimicrobial activity and cytotoxicity aspects,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 30, no. 22, article 1910021, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. H. Yang, Y. Y. Ren, T. Wang, and C. Wang, “Preparation and antibacterial activities of Ag/Ag + /Ag 3+ nanoparticle composites made by pomegranate (Punica granatum) rind extract,” Results in Physics, vol. 6, pp. 299–304, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. F. Mohamed, M. Rabia, and M. Shaban, “Synthesis and characterization of biogenic iron oxides of different nanomorphologies from pomegranate peels for efficient solar hydrogen production,” Journal of Materials Research and Technology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 4255–4271, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. S. N. A. Mohamad Sukri, K. Shameli, M. Mei-Theng Wong, S. Y. Teow, J. Chew, and N. A. Ismail, “Cytotoxicity and antibacterial activities of plant-mediated synthesized zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles using Punica granatum (pomegranate) fruit peels extract,” Journal of Molecular Structure, vol. 1189, pp. 57–65, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. A. Ali and S. Ahmed, “A review on chitosan and its nanocomposites in drug delivery,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 109, pp. 273–286, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. A. A. Tayel, S. A. Ibrahim, M. A. al-Saman, and S. H. Moussa, “Production of fungal chitosan from date wastes and its application as a biopreservative for minced meat,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 69, pp. 471–475, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. A. A. Tayel, “Microbial chitosan as a biopreservative for fish sausages,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 93, no. Part A, pp. 41–46, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. A. A. Tayel, M. M. Gharieb, H. R. Zaki, and N. M. Elguindy, “Bio-clarification of water from heavy metals and microbial effluence using fungal chitosan,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 83, pp. 277–281, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. S. Alsharari, A. A. Tayel, and S. H. Moussa, “Soil emendation with nano-fungal chitosan for heavy metals biosorption,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 118, no. Part B, pp. 2265–2268, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. A. I. Alalawy, H. A. El Rabey, F. M. Almutairi et al., “Effectual anticancer potentiality of loaded bee venom onto fungal chitosan nanoparticles,” International Journal of Polymer Science, vol. 2020, Article ID 2785304, 9 pages, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. L. M. Anaya-Esparza, J. M. Ruvalcaba-Gómez, C. I. Maytorena-Verdugo et al., “Chitosan-TiO2: a versatile hybrid composite,” Materials, vol. 13, no. 4, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. F. A. Al-Sagheer and S. Merchant, “Visco-elastic properties of chitosan–titania nano-composites,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 356–362, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. K. Kavitha, M. Prabhu, V. Rajendran, P. Manivasankan, P. Prabu, and T. Jayakumar, “Optimization of nano-titania and titania–chitosan nanocomposite to enhance biocompatibility,” Current Nanoscience, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 308–317, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. A. A. Tayel, W. F. El-Tras, S. H. Moussa, and S. M. El-Sabbagh, “Surface decontamination and quality enhancement in meat steaks using plant extracts as natural biopreservatives,” Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 755–761, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. M. d. G. A. Korn, A. C. Ferreira, A. C. S. Costa, J. A. Nóbrega, and C. R. Silva, “Comparison of decomposition procedures for analysis of titanium dioxide using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry,” Microchemical Journal, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 41–48, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. A. Buzarovska and A. Grozdanov, “Biodegradable poly(L‐lactic acid)/TiO2 nanocomposites: Thermal properties and degradation,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 123, no. 4, pp. 2187–2193, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. B. Singh, J. P. Singh, A. Kaur, and N. Singh, “Phenolic compounds as beneficial phytochemicals in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) peel: A review,” Food Chemistry, vol. 261, pp. 75–86, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. N. Ahmad, S. Sharma, and R. Rai, “Rapid green synthesis of silver and gold nanoparticles using peels of Punica granatum,” Advanced Materials Letters, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 376–380, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. H. A. el Rabey, F. M. Almutairi, A. I. Alalawy et al., “Augmented control of drug-resistant Candida spp. via fluconazole loading into fungal chitosan nanoparticles,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 141, pp. 511–516, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. P. Manivasakan, V. Rajendran, P. R. Rauta et al., “Effect of TiO2 nanoparticles on properties of silica refractory,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 93, no. 8, pp. 2236–2243, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. A. Jamil, T. H. Bokhari, T. Javed et al., “Photocatalytic degradation of disperse dye Violet-26 using TiO2 and ZnO nanomaterials and process variable optimization,” Journal of Materials Research and Technology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1119–1128, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. L. Yang, L. Jiang, D. Hu et al., “Swelling induced regeneration of TiO2-impregnated chitosan adsorbents under visible light,” Carbohydrate Polymer, vol. 140, pp. 433–441, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. C. Kim, J. Lee, and S. Lee, “TiO2 nanoparticle sorption to sand in the presence of natural organic matter,” Environmental Earth Sciences, vol. 73, no. 9, pp. 5585–5591, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. C. Botta, J. Labille, M. Auffan et al., “TiO2-based nanoparticles released in water from commercialized sunscreens in a life-cycle perspective: structures and quantities,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 159, no. 6, pp. 1543–1550, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. S. Jeon, E. Kim, J. Lee, and S. Lee, “Potential risks of TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles released from sunscreens into outdoor swimming pools,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 317, no. 5, pp. 312–318, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. S. Compant, A. Samad, H. Faist, and A. Sessitsch, “A review on the plant microbiome: ecology, functions, and emerging trends in microbial application,” Journal of Advanced Research, vol. 19, pp. 29–37, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. D. J. Burke, N. Pietrasiak, S. F. Situ et al., “Iron oxide and titanium dioxide nanoparticle effects on plant performance and root associated microbes,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 23630–23650, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. I. Kustiningsih, A. Ridwan, D. Abriyani, M. Syairazy, T. Kurniawan, and D. R. Barleany, “Development of chitosan-TiO2 nanocomposite for packaging film and its ability to inactive Staphylococcus aureus,” Oriental Journal of Chemistry, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 1132–1137, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. N. Nakayama and T. Hayashi, “Preparation and characterization of poly(L-lactic acid)/TiO2 nanoparticle nanocomposite films with high transparency and efficient photodegradability,” Polymer Degradation and Stability, vol. 92, no. 7, pp. 1255–1264, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. L. Bellani, G. Siracusa, L. Giorgetti et al., “TiO2 nanoparticles in a biosolid-amended soil and their implication in soil nutrients, microorganisms and Pisum sativum nutrition,” Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, vol. 190, article 110095, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Mohamed E. EL-Hefnawy. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.