Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Rheumatology
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 937843, 8 pages
Review Article

Targeting Nuclear Hormone Receptors: PPARα Agonists as Potential Disease-Modifying Drugs for Rheumatoid Arthritis

Laboratory of Clinical Immunopharmacology, Scientific Research Institute of Clinical Immunology, RAMS, 14 Yadrintsevskaya Street, Novosibirsk 630099, Russia

Received 30 December 2010; Revised 12 April 2011; Accepted 26 April 2011

Academic Editor: Malcolm Smith

Copyright © 2011 Ivan V. Shirinsky and Valery S. Shirinsky. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


In recent years, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) have received growing interest due to the broad spectrum of their biological activities. PPARα, an isoform of PPAR, plays an important role in lipid homeostasis and inflammation, which makes it a potential target for the treatment of chronic inflammatory disorders, including RA. This paper reviews studies on the properties of PPARα agonists which may be pertinent to the treatment of RA. These properties include effects on lipid metabolism, inflammation, and angiogenesis, as well as interference with glucocorticoid effects, and a potential role in gender dimorphism of autoimmune disorders. However, current clinical experience with this class of drugs in RA is limited. New studies are needed to elucidate whether PPARα agonism may be an effective treatment strategy for RA patients.

1. Introduction

The nuclear hormone receptor superfamily is a large group of related receptors which are able to bind a broad-ranging array of ligands. The peculiarity of nuclear receptors is that upon activation, they act as transcription factors binding to a specific DNA sequence resulting in changes in gene expression. The nuclear receptor superfamily is divided into six subfamilies and 26 groups of receptors. Subfamily 1 is represented by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) (Nuclear Receptors Nomenclature Committee, 1999) [1], which play a major role in lipid metabolism, glucose homeostasis, and inflammatory processes. Three isotypes of PPAR have been described: (1) PPARα, also known as nuclear receptor subfamily 1, group C, member 1 (NR1C1), (2) PPARβ/δ (NR1C2), and (3) PPARγ (NR1C3). These isotypes have different tissue distribution, functions, and ligand specificity. In particular, PPARα is highly expressed in the liver, heart, brown adipose tissue, skeletal muscle, and kidney. Its expression has also been proven on dendritic cells, macrophages, and B and T cells [2]. There are both natural and synthetic ligands of PPARα. Endogenous ligands are mainly unsaturated or polyunsaturated fatty acids and eicosanoids and need to be at micromolar concentrations to achieve PPAR activation [3], except 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycerol-3-phosphocholine (16 : 0/18 : 1 GPC) which has nanomolar affinity [4]. Synthetic agonists of PPARα are hypolipidemic drugs (fenofibrate, gemfibrozil, clofibrate, nafenopin, methyl clofenapate, tibric acid, and Wy-14,643) which act at the nanomolar range. PPARα has been proposed as a key lipid metabolism modulator and regulator of inflammation [2]. Therefore, these properties of PPARα make it a possible target for therapy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), which is characterized by accelerated atherosclerosis and impaired lipid profile [5]. This paper will summarize the data on PPARα biological functions with implications to the treatment of autoimmune disorders as well as the current clinical experience with PPARα agonists in RA.

2. PPARα and Lipid Metabolism

PPARα induces gene transcription after forming heterodimers with the 9-cis retinoic X receptor (RXR). Then these heterodimers bind to specific DNA sequences called Peroxisome Proliferator Response Elements (PPREs) in the promoter regions of multiple target genes forming the so-called PPARα transcriptome (Figure 1) [6].

Figure 1: PPARα and lipid metabolism. PPARα forms heterodimers with RXR. The heterodimers bind to PPREs which leads to enhanced expression of many genes involved in lipid metabolism. The main resulting changes are increased fatty acid oxidation, decreased triglyceride concentration, and increased levels of HDL. RXR: retinoid X receptor, PPRE: peroxisome proliferator response elements, and HDL: high density lipoprotein.

In the liver, activation of PPARα promotes fatty acid oxidation, ketone bodies synthesis, and glucose sparing via the induction of various protein synthesis such as fatty acid transport proteins and acyl-CoA oxidase [2].

In terms of lipoprotein metabolism, PPARα activation results in changes in transcription of multiple genes including LPL, APOC3, PCKK9, ANGPTL3, APOA1, APOA2, and APOA5 [7]. A well-known effect of fibrates is a reduction in plasma triglyceride levels. This is thought to be a result of enhanced lypolysis of very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) triglyceride induced by changes in LPL, APOC3, and APOA5 transcription. APOA1, APOA2 transcription changes result in enhanced apoA-I and apoA-II production leading to increased high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) concentrations [7].

The lipid-modulating properties of fibrates suggest that they may improve impaired lipid profile observed in RA patients (Table 1). Thus, although triglycerides are less strongly associated with cardiovascular risk in RA patients than in people without RA [8], their reduction induced by fibrate treatment may be of benefit. Moreover, in one study it has been shown that, under fibrate treatment, only triglycerides were independent predictors of CHD [9].

Table 1: Some metabolic effects of PPARα agonists with their relevance to RA.

Another important lipid target of fibrates is HDL-c whose concentrations are decreased in RA and have been linked to excess cardiovascular events in some studies [10].

Apart from their beneficial action, fibrates may have some undesirable metabolic effects, particularly increased homocysteine levels [11]. Homocysteine reduces apoA-I synthesis in the liver leading to decreased plasma apoA-I levels [12]. It has been shown that higher homocysteine levels correlate with smaller increases in HDL and apoA-I after fenofibrate treatment [13]. Fenofibrate effects on oxidized low density lipoprotein (oxLDL), which is elevated in RA and probably linked with cardiovascular morbidity [14], are also diminished by high levels of homocysteine [15]. It should be noted that homocysteine itself is an independent risk factor of cardiovascular disease in RA [16], although, to date homocysteine-lowering treatment has not been proven to be effective in reducing cardiovascular outcomes, possibly due to not taking into account baseline homocysteine concentrations [17]. As the majority of patients with RA are now taking folate as supplementation to methotrexate treatment, it may lead to serum homocysteine reduction and thus improve lipid-modulating effects of fenofibrate, enhancing its action on HDL, apoA-I, and oxLDL.

3. Anti-Inflammatory Action of PPARα

A number of in-vitro studies exploiting different experimental models have investigated effects of PPARα agonists on inflammation markers. It has been found that PPARα agonists inhibited inducible nitric-oxide synthase activity in murine macrophages [21], and VCAM-1 expression in endothelial cells [22]. In human aortic smooth muscle cells (SMC), PPARα agonists reduced IL-1 induced production of IL-6, prostaglandin, and expression of COX-2 [23, 24]. In addition, PPARα ligands induced apoptosis of human monocyte-derived macrophages activated by TNF-α or IFN-γ [25].

The first evidence of the in-vivo anti-inflammatory action of PPARα agonists in humans came from the studies performed on patients with hyperlipidemia and metabolic syndrome. Thus, fenofibrate treatment decreased plasma concentrations of IL-6, fibrinogen, and C-reactive protein [24] in hyperlipidemic patients. In another study performed on hyperlipoproteinemia IIb and atherosclerosis patients, micronized fenofibrate reduced serum TNF-α and IFN-γ concentrations [26]. These results have been confirmed by a small randomized placebo-controlled study in patients with metabolic syndrome, showing decreases in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and IL-6 levels following fenofibrate therapy. These fenofibrate effects were independent of its effects on lipid and glucose metabolism [27].

Several studies have sought to characterize the molecular mechanisms implicated in the downmodulation of inflammatory mediators by PPARα activation. As a result, it has been demonstrated that PPARα exerts its effects on proinflammatory cytokine gene expression by antagonizing the AP-1 and nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) transcriptional activities in human aortic SMC [24, 28]. An additional molecular mechanism of PPARα agonists’ anti-inflammatory action is induction of the expression of the NF-κB inhibitory protein IκBα found in SMC as well as in primary human hepatocytes (Figure 2) [29].

Figure 2: A hypothetical model for PPARα-induced anti-inflammatory effects in rheumatoid arthritis. PPARα might suppress transcriptional activity of NFκB by several mechanisms: directly, by inducing IκB transcription or by inhibition of NFκB migration into nucleus. Another transcription factor AP-1 is also suppressed by PPARα. Down regulation of NFκB and AP-1 results in reduced synthesis of various mediators involved in joint inflammation and damage as well as in atherosclerotic plaque formation. NFκB: nuclear factor κB, IκB: inhibitor of κB, AP-1: activator protein 1.

The biological role of PPARα-induced anti-inflammatory effects seems to be the control of inflammatory response duration. This control is probably mediated by endogenous PPARα ligand leukotriene B4 (LTB4), which is a powerful chemotactic inflammatory eicosanoid. PPARα activation leads to transcription of genes of the β- and ω-oxidation pathways that neutralize and degrade LTB4 itself, thus regulating inflammation by a negative feedback loop [30].

The experimental and clinical studies relevant to atherosclerosis and dyslipidemia were followed by the work of Okamoto et al. [31] who assessed the anti-inflammatory effects of PPARα activation in rheumatoid synovial fibroblasts (RSF) cultures and in a rodent model of inflammatory arthritis. Fenofibrate reduced IL-1β-stimulated production of IL-6, IL-8, and GM-CSF as well as nuclear translocation of NF-kB in RSF. The therapeutic use of fenofibrate leads to clinical improvement and inhibited mononuclear cell infiltration and reduced pannus formation in the synovial tissue of rats with adjuvant-induced arthritis. Moreover, fenofibrate inhibited osteoclast formation from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells in-vitro.

Several other studies evaluated the effects of PPARα agonists on cytokine production in different experimental settings. Thus, fenofibrate repressed interleukin-17 and interferon-gamma expression and decreased colonic lymphocyte infiltration in a colitis model in interleukin-10-deficient mice [32]. Fenofibrate treatment also resulted in clinical improvement and enhanced cardiac expression of IL-10 mRNA in a rat model of experimental autoimmune myocarditis [33].

Taken together, these data give a rationale for PPARα agonists to be evaluated both as modulators of the inflammatory response and as a disease-modifying class of drug in RA.

4. PPARα Interference with Glucocorticoid Effects

It is known that PPARα is activated by glucocorticoids (GC) during fasting or stress [34]. Recently, it has become apparent that PPARα may itself modulate multiple biological effects of GC.

Genomic mechanisms of GC action are mediated by binding of GC to cytosolic GC receptors (cGCR). Then GC/cGCR complex is translocated into the nucleus to consensus palindromic DNA sites, which are called GC responsive elements (GRE) [35]. Genes regulated by GRE encode proteins involved in glucose, fat, and protein metabolism. Alternatively, activated cGCR monomers can also influence gene expression by interfering with the activity of transcription factors NF-κB and AP-1, which play a key role in inflammatory mediator synthesis. There is a broad consensus that GCs exert their anti-inflammatory effects via transrepression of NF-κB and AP-1 whereas detrimental side effects originate from the transactivation capacities of GR mediated by GRE binding [35].

There have been several studies evaluating interactions between the effects of GC and PPARα activation. Riccardi et al. studied anti-inflammatory effects of dexamethasone on experimental inflammatory bowel disease in PPARα knockout mice in comparison with wild type mice. The authors found that dexamethasone was less effective in PPARα null mice as evaluated by inhibition of proinflammatory cytokine production, cell migration, oxidative stress, apoptosis, and colon injury. These findings indicate that PPARα agonism may contribute to the anti-inflammatory action of GC [36].

To elucidate molecular mechanisms of PPARα and GC synergism, Bougarne et al performed a study evaluating a functional cross-talk between PPARα- and GCR-mediated signaling pathways. As was expected, simultaneous activation of PPARα and GCR enhanced transrepression of NF-κB-driven genes and additively decreased proinflammatory cytokine production. On the other hand, PPARα activation inhibited the expression of classical GRE-driven genes, thus acting as a potential antagonist to GC with respect to their effects on glucose, fat, and protein metabolism [37]. So it can be hypothesized that PPARα agonists attenuate GC side effects while enhancing their anti-inflammatory activity via transrepression of NF-κB (Figure 3).

Figure 3: (a) a hypothetical mechanisms of PPARα interference with glucocorticoid effects. GC/GCR complex binds to specific DNA sites called GRE which results in increased expression of many genes encoding proteins involved in fat, glucose, and protein metabolism. Adverse effects of GC are thought to stem from GRE binding. GC/GCR also down regulates transcription factors NFκB and AP-1 thus suppressing synthesis of inflammatory mediators. (b) PPARα further inhibits NFκB and AP-1 thus enhancing GC anti-inflammatory action. PPARα inhibition of GC/GCR-mediated GRE activation leads to attenuation of GC-induced adverse events. GC: glucocorticoid, GCR: glucocorticoid receptor, GRE: glucocorticoid response element, NFκB: nuclear factor κB, IκB: inhibitor of κB, and AP-1: activator protein 1.

5. PPARα and Angiogenesis

Angiogenesis, or formation of new capillaries from preexisting vessels, is a characteristic feature of inflamed synovium in RA and develops at the earliest stage of the disease process. Angiogenesis is essential for the formation of the inflammatory pannus, and without angiogenesis, leukocyte migration could not occur [38].

The role of PPARα in angiogenesis is controversial. In one study, fenofibrate was shown to inhibit endothelial cell proliferation induced by angiogenic factors, endothelial cell migration in a healing wound model, capillary tube formation in-vitro, and angiogenesis in-vivo [39]. Other research has demonstrated antiangiogenic effects of fibrates leading to suppressed tumor growth [40]. In contrast, fenofibrate enhanced neovascularization in a murine hind-limb ischemia model [41] and in a murine corneal model of angiogenesis [42].

Modulatory effects of PPARα on angiogenesis seem to be mediated by changes in the expression of different pro-angiogenic modulators, such as VEGF, fibroblast growth factors (FGF), thrombospondin, and endostatin [43].

In contrast with angiogenesis, vasculogenesis, which is de novo capillary formation from endothelial precursor cells (EPCs), is impaired in RA. Deteriorated function of EPC may lead to changes in vasculogenesis resulting in accelerated atherosclerosis and vascular disease [44].

Using a PPARα−/− mouse model, Benameur et al. have demonstrated that EPC differentiation induced by microparticles (small vesicles released from the plasma membrane of stimulated or apoptotic cells) is dependent on PPARα and mediated by the NF-κB pathway [45]. On the basis of this study, it may be speculated that PPARα agonists improve vasculogenesis via stimulation of EPC.

Thus, the effects of PPARα on angiogenesis and vasculogenesis seem to be multidirectional and probably depend on the local cytokine and growth factor balance as well as the disease model studied.

6. PPARα, Sexual Dimorphism, and Autoimmune Diseases

Apart from its importance in energy metabolism and inflammation, PPARα has been shown to play a role in sexual dimorphism partly due to an ability to regulate female-specific gene expression in the liver [46]. Dunn et al. have further demonstrated that this aspect of PPARα biology might be relevant in the context of autoimmune disease pathogenesis. In their study, they found that PPARα was more abundant in male as compared with female CD4 (+) cells and its expression was sensitive to androgen levels. Genetic ablation of PPARα resulted in higher production of IFN-γ and TNF-α, and lower production of T helper (Th)2 cytokines due to upregulation of NF-κB and c-jun activity in male T lymphocytes. Moreover, male, but not female, PPARα (−/−) mice developed more severe experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. The authors’ conclusion is that males are less prone to develop Th1-mediated autoimmunity because they have higher T-cell expression of PPARα [47]. These findings allow one to hypothesize that PPARα may be important in gender dimorphism in human autoimmune disorders including RA.

7. Clinical Use of PPARα Agonists in RA

To date, the clinical experience with PPARα agonists in RA is limited. First, a case report on a female patient with refractory RA taking fenofibrate showed long-lasting improvement of her symptoms [48]. Goto reported a randomized study of 44 RA patients comparing fenofibrate and statins. Fenofibrate, but not statins, significantly decreased serum levels of total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and triglycerides. In comparison with statins, fenofibrate significantly reduced prednisolone use. Unfortunately, the author has described neither changes in composite disease activity measures nor clinical response rates after fenofibrate therapy [49].

8. Conclusion

There is a substantial body of data suggesting that PPARα may be of benefit in patients with RA due to their anti-inflammatory and lipid-modulating properties. Proof-of-concept studies are needed to assess efficacy and safety of PPARα agonists in autoimmune diseases including RA and to address the issues arising from our current understating of PPARα agonists pharmacology (Table 2).

Table 2: Future research agenda.


The authors would like to thank Jeff Eberle for his invaluable help in editing this paper.


  1. Nuclear Receptors Nomenclature Committee, “A unified nomenclature system for the nuclear receptor superfamily,” Cell, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 161–163, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  2. S. R. Pyper, N. Viswakarma, S. Yu, and J. K. Reddy, “PPARalpha: energy combustion, hypolipidemia, inflammation and cancer,” Nuclear Receptor Signaling, vol. 8, no. 16, article e002, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  3. L. Michalik, J. Auwerx, J. P. Berger et al., “International union of pharmacology. LXI. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors,” Pharmacological Reviews, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 726–741, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  4. M. V. Chakravarthy, Z. Pan, Y. Zhu et al., ““New” hepatic fat activates PPARalpha to maintain glucose, lipid, and cholesterol homeostasis,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 309–322, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  5. S. E. Gabriel, “Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in rheumatoid arthritis,” American Journal of Medicine, vol. 121, no. 10, supplement 1, pp. S9–S14, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  6. N. Rotman and W. Wahli, “Fatty acid synthesis and PPARalpha hand in hand,” Chemistry and Biology, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 801–802, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  7. A. Shah, D. J. Rader, and J. S. Millar, “The effect of PPAR-alpha agonism on apolipoprotein metabolism in humans,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 210, no. 1, pp. 35–40, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  8. A. G. Semb, T. K. Kvien, A. H. Aastveit et al., “Lipids, myocardial infarction and ischaemic stroke in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the apolipoprotein-related mortality RISk (AMORIS) study,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 1996–2001, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  9. C. Straczek, M. Tafflet, P. Barberger-Gateau et al., “Do lipids and apolipoproteins predict coronary heart disease under statin and fibrate therapy in the primary prevention setting in community-dwelling elderly subjects? The 3C Study,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 214, no. 2, pp. 426–431, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  10. J. F. Boyer, P. A. Gourraud, A. Cantagrel, J. L. Davignon, and A. Constantin, “Traditional cardiovascular risk factors in rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis,” Joint, Bone, Spine, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 179–183, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  11. C. Foucher, L. Brugere, J. C. Ansquer et al., “Fenofibrate, homocysteine and renal function,” Current Vascular Pharmacology, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 589–603, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  12. D. Liao, H. Tan, R. Hui et al., “Hyperhomocysteinemia decreases circulating high-density lipoprotein by inhibiting apolipoprotein A-I protein synthesis and enhancing HDL cholesterol clearance,” Circulation Research, vol. 99, no. 6, pp. 598–606, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  13. M. R. Taskinen, D. R. Sullivan, C. Ehnholm et al., “Relationships of HDL cholesterol, ApoA-I, and ApoA-II with homocysteine and creatinine in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with fenofibrate,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 950–955, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  14. N. Vuilleumier, J. Bratt, R. Alizadeh, T. Jogestrand, I. Hafstrom, and J. Frostegard, “Anti-apoA-1 IgG and oxidized LDL are raised in rheumatoid arthritis (RA): potential associations with cardiovascular disease and RA disease activity,” Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 447–453, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  15. O. Mayer Jr., J. Šimon, L. Holubec, R. Pikner, and L. Trefil, “Folate co-administration improves the effectiveness of fenofibrate to decrease the lipoprotein oxidation and endothelial dysfunction surrogates,” Physiological Research, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 475–481, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. Berglund, A. Södergren, S. Wållberg Jonsson, and S. Rantapää Dahlqvist, “Atherothrombotic events in rheumatoid arthritis are predicted by homocysteine—a six-year follow-up study,” Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 822–825, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. M. Abraham and L. Cho, “The homocysteine hypothesis: still relevant to the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease?” Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, vol. 77, no. 12, pp. 911–918, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  18. S. Abourbih, K. B. Filion, L. Joseph et al., “Effect of fibrates on lipid profiles and cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review,” American Journal of Medicine, vol. 122, no. 10, pp. e961–e968, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  19. J. Sasaki, K. Yamamoto, and M. Ageta, “Effects of fenofibrate on high-density lipoprotein particle size in patients with hyperlipidemia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, crossover study,” Clinical Therapeutics, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 1614–1626, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. Dierkes, C. Luley, and S. Westphal, “Effect of lipid-lowering and anti-hypertensive drugs on plasma homocysteine levels,” Vascular Health and Risk Management, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 99–108, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. P. R. Colville-Nash, S. S. Qureshi, D. Willis, and D. A. Willoughby, “Inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists: correlation with induction of heme oxygenase 1,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 161, no. 2, pp. 978–984, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. N. Marx, G. K. Sukhova, T. Collins, P. Libby, and J. Plutzky, “PPARalpha activators inhibit cytokine-induced vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 expression in human endothelial cells,” Circulation, vol. 99, no. 24, pp. 3125–3131, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. Y. Rival, L. Puech, T. Taillandier et al., “PPAR activators and COX inhibitors selectively block cytokine-induced COX-2 expression and activity in human aortic smooth muscle cells,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 606, no. 1–3, pp. 121–129, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  24. B. Staels, W. Koenig, A. Habib et al., “Activation of human aortic smooth-muscle cells is inhibited by PPARalpha but not by PPARgamma activators,” Nature, vol. 393, no. 6687, pp. 790–793, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  25. G. Chinetti, S. Griglio, M. Antonucci et al., “Activation of proliferator-activated receptors alpha and gamma induces apoptosis of human monocyte-derived macrophages,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 273, no. 40, pp. 25573–25580, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  26. A. Madej, B. Okopien, J. Kowalski et al., “Effects of fenofibrate on plasma cytokine concentrations in patients with atherosclerosis and hyperlipoproteinemia IIb,” International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 345–349, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. R. Belfort, R. Berria, J. Cornell, and K. Cusi, “Fenofibrate reduces systemic inflammation markers independent of its effects on lipid and glucose metabolism in patients with the metabolic syndrome,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 829–836, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  28. P. Delerive, K. De Bosscher, S. Besnard et al., “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha negatively regulates the vascular inflammatory gene response by negative cross-talk with transcription factors NF-kappaB and AP-1,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, no. 45, pp. 32048–32054, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. P. Delerive, P. Gervois, J. C. Fruchart, and B. Staels, “Induction of IkappaBalpha expression as a mechanism contributing to the anti-inflammatory activities of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha activators,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 47, pp. 36703–36707, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  30. P. R. Devchand, H. Keller, J. M. Peters, M. Vazquez, F. J. Gonzalez, and W. Wahli, “The PPARalpha-leukotriene B4 pathway to inflammation control,” Nature, vol. 384, no. 6604, pp. 39–43, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  31. H. Okamoto, T. Iwamoto, S. Kotake, S. Momohara, H. Yamanaka, and N. Kamatani, “Inhibition of NF-kappaB signaling by fenofibrate, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha ligand, presents a therapeutic strategy for rheumatoid arthritis,” Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 323–330, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. J. W. Lee, P. J. Bajwa, M. J. Carson et al., “Fenofibrate represses interleukin-17 and interferon-gamma expression and improves colitis in interleukin-10-deficient mice,” Gastroenterology, vol. 133, no. 1, pp. 108–123, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  33. S. Maruyama, K. Kato, M. Kodama et al., “Fenofibrate, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha activator, suppresses experimental autoimmune myocarditis by stimulating the interleukin-10 pathway in rats,” Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 87–92, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. T. Lemberger, R. Saladin, M. Vázquez et al., “Expression of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha gene is stimulated by stress and follows a diurnal rhythm,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 271, no. 3, pp. 1764–1769, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. K. De Bosscher, W. Vanden Berghe, and G. Haegeman, “Mechanisms of anti-inflammatory action and of immunosuppression by glucocorticoids: negative interference of activated glucocorticoid receptor with transcription factors,” Journal of Neuroimmunology, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 16–22, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. L. Riccardi, E. Mazzon, S. Bruscoli et al., “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha modulates the anti-inflammatory effect of glucocorticoids in a model of inflammatory bowel disease in mice,” Shock, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 308–316, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  37. N. Bougarne, R. Paumelle, S. Caron et al., “PPARalpha blocks glucocorticoid receptor alpha-mediated transactivation but cooperates with the activated glucocorticoid receptor alpha for transrepression on NF-kappaB,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 18, pp. 7397–7402, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  38. A. E. Koch, “The role of angiogenesis in rheumatoid arthritis: recent developments,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 59, supplement 1, pp. i65–i71, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. J. Varet, L. Vincent, P. Mirshahi et al., “Fenofibrate inhibits angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 810–819, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. D. Panigrahy, A. Kaipainen, S. Huang et al., “PPARalpha agonist fenofibrate suppresses tumor growth through direct and indirect angiogenesis inhibition,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 985–990, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  41. A. Katayama, Y. Yamamoto, K. Tanaka et al., “Fenofibrate enhances neovascularization in a murine ischemic hindlimb model,” Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 399–404, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  42. F. Biscetti, E. Gaetani, A. Flex et al., “Selective activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)alpha and PPAR gamma induces neoangiogenesis through a vascular endothelial growth factor-dependent mechanism,” Diabetes, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 1394–1404, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  43. F. Biscetti, G. Straface, D. Pitocco, F. Zaccardi, G. Ghirlanda, and A. Flex, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors and angiogenesis,” Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 751–759, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  44. Z. Szekanecz, T. Besenyei, A. Szentpetery, and A. E. Koch, “Angiogenesis and vasculogenesis in rheumatoid arthritis,” Current Opinion in Rheumatology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 299–306, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  45. T. Benameur, S. Tual-Chalot, R. Andriantsitohaina, and M. C. Martinez, “PPARalpha is essential for microparticle-induced differentiation of mouse bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells and angiogenesis,” PLoS One, vol. 5, no. 8, Article ID e12392, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  46. N. Leuenberger, S. Pradervand, and W. Wahli, “Sumoylated PPARalpha mediates sex-specific gene repression and protects the liver from estrogen-induced toxicity in mice,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 119, no. 10, pp. 3138–3148, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  47. S. E. Dunn, S. S. Ousman, R. A. Sobel et al., “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)alpha expression in T cells mediates gender differences in development of T cell-mediated autoimmunity,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 204, no. 2, pp. 321–330, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  48. H. Okamoto and N. Kamatani, “Successful treatment with fenofibrate, a peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha ligand, for a patient with rheumatoid arthritis,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 63, no. 8, pp. 1002–1003, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  49. M. Goto, “A comparative study of anti-inflammatory and antidyslipidemic effects of fenofibrate and statins on rheumatoid arthritis,” Modern Rheumatology, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 238–243, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus