Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Rotating Machinery
Volume 2008, Article ID 784749, 10 pages
Research Article

The Fisher Information Matrix as a Relevant Tool for Sensor Selection in Engine Health Monitoring

Turbomachinery Group, University of Liège, Chemin des Chevreuils 1, 4000 Liège, Belgium

Received 24 April 2008; Accepted 22 August 2008

Academic Editor: Eric Maslen

Copyright © 2008 S. Borguet and O. Léonard. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. J. Volponi, “Foundation of gas path analysis (part i and ii),” in Gas Turbine Condition Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis, Von Karman Institute Lecture Series no. 1, Von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, Brussels, Belgium, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  2. Y. G. Li, “Performance-analysis-based gas turbine diagnostics: a review,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers A, vol. 216, no. 5, pp. 363–377, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. Ph. Kaboukos, P. Oikonomou, A. Stamatis, and K. Mathioudakis, “Optimizing diagnostic effectiveness of mixed turbofans by means of adaptive modelling and choice of appropriate monitoring parameters,” in Ageing Mechanisms and Control Specialists' Meeting on Life Management Techniques for Ageing Air Vehicles, Manchester, UK, October 2001.
  4. R. Mushini and D. Simon, “On optimization of sensor selection for aircraft gas turbine engines,” in Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Systems Engineering (ICSEng '05), pp. 9–14, Las Vegas, Nev, USA, August 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. G. Bechini, G. Ameyugo, L. Marinai, and R. Singh, “Gas path diagnostics: the importance of measurement selection in the monitoring process,” in Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines (ISABE '05), Munich, Germany, September 2005, ISABE-2005-1281.
  6. M. J. Provost, The use of optimal estimation techniques in the analysis of gas turbines, Ph.D. thesis, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK, 1994.
  7. P. H. Kirkegaard and R. Brincker, “On the optimal location of sensors for parametric identification of linear structural systems,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 639–647, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. F. W. J. van den Berg, H. C. J. Hoefsloot, H. F. M. Boelens, and A. K. Smilde, “Selection of optimal sensor position in a tubular reactor using robust degree of observability criteria,” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 827–837, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. A. Vande Wouwer, N. Point, S. Porteman, and M. Remy, “Approach to the selection of optimal sensor locations in distributed parameter systems,” Journal of Process Control, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 291–300, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. C. Papadimitriou, “Optimal sensor placement methodology for parametric identification of structural systems,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 278, no. 4-5, pp. 923–947, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  11. M. J. Schervish, Theory of Statistics, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1995.
  12. C. R. Rao, Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1973.
  13. R. G. Brown, “Not just observable, but how observable,” in Proceedings of the National Electronics Conference (NEC '66), vol. 22, pp. 709–714, October 1966.
  14. G. Strang, Linear Algebra and Its Applications, Brooks Cole, San Anselmo, Calif, USA, 3rd edition, 1988.
  15. E. Castillo, A. J. Conejo, R. E. Pruneda, and C. Solares, “State estimation observability based on the null space of the measurement Jacobian matrix,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1656–1658, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. A. Stamatis, K. Mathioudakis, J. Ruiz, and B. Curnock, “Real time engine model implementation for adaptive control and performance monitoring of large civil turbofans,” in Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo, New Orleans, La, USA, June 2001, 2001-GT-0362.
  17. L. Jaw and S. Garg, “Propulsion control technology development in the united states (a historical perspective),” Technical Memorandum, NASA, Moffett Field, Calif, USA, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  18. B. A. Roth, D. L. Doel, and J. J. Cissell, “Probabilistic matching of turbofan performance models to test data,” in Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo, Reno-Tahoe, Nev, USA, June 2005, GT2005-68201.
  19. B. Curnock, “Obidicote project-word package 4: steady-state test cases,” Rolls-Royce PLc, London, UK, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  20. P. Dewallef, Application of the Kalman filter to health monitoring of gas turbine engines: a sequential approach to robust diagnosis, Ph.D. thesis, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium, 2005.
  21. S. Borguet and O. Léonard, “Coupling principal component analysis and Kalman filter algorithms for on-line aircraft engine diagnostics,” in Proceedings of the 18th International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines (ISABE '07), Beijing, China, September 2007, ISABE-2007-1275.
  22. J. S. Litt, “An optimal orthogonal decomposition method for Kalman filter-based turbofan engine thrust estimation,” in Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo, Reno-Tahoe, Nev, USA, June 2005, GT2005-68808.