Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Rotating Machinery
Volume 2011, Article ID 143523, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/143523
Research Article

Model Reduction of the Flexible Rotating Crankshaft of a Motorcycle Engine Cranktrain

DIEM, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bologna, via Fontanelle Street 40, 47121 Forlì, Italy

Received 15 September 2010; Revised 26 February 2011; Accepted 21 March 2011

Academic Editor: Jerzy Sawicki

Copyright © 2011 Stefano Ricci et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. H. Y. I. Du, “Simulation of flexible rotating crankshaft with flexible engine block and hydrodynamic bearings for a V6 engine,” Technical Paper 1999-01-1752, SAE International, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  2. L. Mayer, J. Zeischka, M. Scherens, and F. Maessen, “Analysis of flexible rotating crankshaft with flexible engine block using MSC/NASTRAN and DADS,” in Proceedings of the MSC World User's Conference, pp. 1–15, Universal City, Calif, USA, May 1995.
  3. Z.-D. Ma and N. C. Perkins, “An efficient multibody dynamics model for internal combustion engine systems,” Multibody System Dynamics, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 363–391, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. Z. P. Mourelatos, “A crankshaft system model for structural dynamic analysis of internal combustion engines,” Computers and Structures, vol. 79, no. 20-21, pp. 2009–2027, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. A. Shabana, Dynamics of Multibody Systems, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 2005.
  6. R. R. Craig and M. C. C. Bampton, “Coupling of substructures for dynamic analyses,” AIAA Journal, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 1313–1319, 1968. View at Google Scholar
  7. R. H. MacNeal, “A hybrid method of component mode synthesis,” Computers and Structures, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 581–601, 1971. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Rubin, “Improved component-mode representation for structural dynamic analysis,” AIAA Journal, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 995–1006, 1975. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. R. Craig, “Coupling of substructures for dynamic analysis: an overview,” in Proceedings of the 41st AIAA/ASMA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Material Conference, Atlanta, Ga, USA, April 2000, AIAA-2000-1573.
  10. J. T. Spanos and W. S. Tsuha, “Selection of component modes for flexible multibody simulation,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 278–286, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. D. C. Kammer and M. J. Triller, “Ranking the dynamic importance of fixed interface modes using a generalization of effective mass,” Modal Analysis, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 77–98, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. C. Kammer and M. J. Triller, “Selection of component modes for Craig-Bampton substructure representations,” ASME Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 264–270, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. G. Bocchi, Four Strokes Engines, Hoepli, Milano, Italy, 1987.
  14. MSC Software Corporation, “Theory of flexible bodies,” ADAMS Document no. 9304: Using ADAMS/Flex, 2009.