Comparison of Frequency Domain and Time-Domain Methods for Aeromechanical Analysis

<table class="figure-group"><tr class="fig-image" id="a"><td><object data="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/ijrm/volume-2016/4293414/figures/4293414.fig.003a.svgz" name="4293414.fig.003a" type="image/svg+xml"></object></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td><b>(a) </b>Upper plate</td></tr><tr class="fig-image" id="b"><td><object data="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/ijrm/volume-2016/4293414/figures/4293414.fig.003b.svgz" name="4293414.fig.003b" type="image/svg+xml"></object></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td><b>(b) </b>Lower plate</td></tr></table>

<div>Unsteady pressure (Pa), time-domain method (interblade phase angle = 180 deg).</div>

International Journal of Rotating Machinery

fig3

Figure 3

Figure 3: Comparison of Frequency Domain and Time-Domain Methods for Aeromechanical Analysis 