Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry

Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry / 2015 / Article
Special Issue

Chemistry of Medicinal Plants, Foods, and Natural Products 2015

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 673547 |

Souleymane Bado, Patrice Bazongo, Gouyahali Son, Moe Thida Kyaw, Brian Peter Forster, Stephan Nielen, Anne Mette Lykke, Amadé Ouédraogo, Imaël Henri Nestor Bassolé, "Physicochemical Characteristics and Composition of Three Morphotypes of Cyperus esculentus Tubers and Tuber Oils", Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry, vol. 2015, Article ID 673547, 8 pages, 2015.

Physicochemical Characteristics and Composition of Three Morphotypes of Cyperus esculentus Tubers and Tuber Oils

Academic Editor: Jian Yang
Received27 Nov 2014
Revised09 Apr 2015
Accepted23 Apr 2015
Published11 Oct 2015


Tuber characteristics and nutrient composition of three morphotypes of Cyperus esculentus tubers and tuber oils were determined. The mean value for length and width of the tuber and one thousand dried tuber weights ranged from 0.98 to 1.31 cm, 0.90 to 1.19 cm, and 598 to 1044 g, respectively. Tubers displayed high level of starch (30.54–33.21 g 100 g−1), lipid (24.91–28.94 g 100 g−1), and sucrose (17.98–20.39 g 100 g−1). The yellow tubers had significantly higher content in lipid compared to black ones. Levels of ascorbic acid, tocopherol, and β-carotene of the three morphotypes differed significantly. Yellow ones (morphotypes 1 and 2) were the richest in tocopherol and the poorest in β-carotene. Saturated fatty acid content of morphotype 2 was significantly lower than that of morphotypes 1 and 3. Morphotype 3 had the significantly lowest PUFA content compared to morphotypes 1 and 2. Morphotype 1 was found to be richer in Ca, Cu, and Mn contents. Al, Mg, P, S, and Si were most abundant in morphotype 2. Morphotype 3 had the highest content of Cl, K, and Zn.

1. Introduction

Cyperaceae is a family of monocotyledonous graminoid flowering plants known as sedges, which superficially resemble grasses or rushes. About 5,500 species have been described in the family [1] including Cyperus esculentus. Cyperus esculentus provides edible tubers commonly called tigernut, chufa sedge, nut grass, yellow nutsedge, tigernut sedge, or earth almond. Tigernut is a perennial crop cultivated particularly in tropical and subtropical areas worldwide and extensively in Africa, Asia, and some European countries for their sweetish tubers. In Africa, tigernut is mostly cultivated in the west, Ivory Coast, Ghana, Mali, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal and Togo where they are used primarily uncooked as a side dish [2]. The tubers are used fresh as a vegetable or dried as a sweet snack. They are also grinded into flour and used as a thickener, for bread and cakes or mixed with water as drink. The tubers are often considered as “health” food because they have excellent nutritional properties and prevent heart diseases and thrombosis. Tigernut is known to activate blood circulation, to reduce risk of colon cancer and diabetes, and to favor weight loss [3]. Tigernut is also known to have aphrodisiac, carminative, diuretic, emmenagogue, stimulant, and tonic effects and even some medicinal uses such as treatment of flatulence, indigestion, diarrhea, dysentery, and excessive thirst [4]. Tigernut is used as livestock food and is in southern USA ranked among the top 10 most important waterfowl foods [5]. Tigernut flour is a rich source of carbohydrate, oil, and some useful mineral elements such as iron and calcium which are necessary for body growth and development [6, 7]. Three varieties have been reported on the basis of their color, namely, yellow, black, and brown varieties [8]. Tigernut was reported to be rich in carbohydrates, dietary fiber, lipids, and oleic acid [3, 9]. Despite its great potentialities the tigernut remains an underutilized plant [7]. Most of the studies focused on the yellow variety while very little information exists on the physical characteristics of tigernut tubers. A better understanding of morphological parameters of the tigernut tubers as well as their link to the nutrition composition will help to identify valuable varieties and promote their use. So, this crop could contribute to the poverty alleviation among vulnerable populations, particularly rural women, in Western Africa. The aim of this study was to determine the physical traits as well as the chemical characteristics of the tubers from the three morphotypes of tigernut grown in Burkina Faso.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

Tubers of Cyperus esculentus L. were sampled in January and February 2007–2009, in 5 villages located in western and southwestern Burkina Faso: Loropéni (10°18′N, 3°32′W), Mangodara (9°54′N, 4°21′W), Ouéléni (10°51′N, 5°21′W), Tangora (10°38′N, 4°45′W), and Tiéfora (10°38′N, 4°33′W). Five kilograms of tubers was collected in each village, immediately hand-sorted to eliminate damaged ones, and taken to the laboratory. Prior to any analysis, the samples were washed with distilled water, drained, and air-dried. Each village sample was split into two parts; one part was finely ground with a Moulinex grinder robot (GT550, Zurich, Switzerland). Both parts were packing in an airtight container and stored at −18°C until analysis.

2.2. Analytical Methods
2.2.1. Physical Analysis

To determine the mean length and width of the tubers, 100 tubers were per village randomly picked and their two linear dimensions were measured using a Vernier caliper with an accuracy of 0.01 mm (Canon Instruments, Japan). The thousand dried tubers weight (TSW) was obtained by counting 1000 dried tubers and weighted on an electronic balance to 0.001 g accuracy (Ohaus, USA). The variation in tubers size and color was used to classify the tigernut into different morphotypes.

2.2.2. Chemical Analysis

The official methods of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists [10] were used to determine moisture, protein, crude oil, and ash contents of the tubers. Moisture (g water 100 g−1 sample) was determined by drying a 3 g ground sample at 105°C to constant weight. Nitrogen content was determined by using the Kjeldahl method and multiplied by a factor of 6.25 to determine the crude protein content (g protein 100 g−1 sample). Crude fat (g fat 100 g−1 sample) was obtained by exhaustively extracting 5.0 g of each sample in a Soxhlet apparatus using petroleum ether (boiling point range 40–60°C) as the extractant. Mineralization was performed on 3 g samples by combustion in a muffle furnace at 550°C for 8 h (g ash 100 g−1 sample) (AOAC 920.39C). Carbohydrate content was estimated by difference of mean values: 100 − (sum of percentages of ash, protein, and lipids) [11].

2.2.3. Starch and Sugar Analysis

AOAC method 996.11 was used to determine starch content of Cyperus esculentus tuber flours. The assay consisted of using thermostable alpha-amylase and amyloglucosidase to enzymatically hydrolyze starch into glucose that was then quantified with a spectrophotometer (μQuant, Bioteck Instruments Inc, USA). Glucose, sucrose fructose, and maltose were analyzed by HPLC according to the AOAC Official Method 982.14 [12]. Samples for HPLC sugars analysis were prepared by homogenizing 0.3 g of Cyperus esculentus flour in 3 mL distilled water and 7 mL 95% alcohol and shaken before being centrifuged at 10 000 rpm for 20 min. The clear supernatant was filtered through 0.45 μm filter and degasified before analysis by HPLC. Filtered solution (20 μL) was injected into HPLC 1100 Series (Agilent, Waldbronn, Germany) equipped with a G1362A refractive index detector. Sugars were separated using a commercially packed with Zobax-NH2 column (250 × 4.6 mm (Dupont, Wilmington, DE, USA)) with a particle size of 5 μm and thermostatized at 30°C. The filtered and degasified mixture of acetonitrile/water (80/20) was used as mobile phase at a flow rate of 1 mL/min for 30 min run time [13]. The sugars peaks were identified by comparing their retention times with individual standard sucrose, maltose, glucose, and fructose approximately 99% pure (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) and the chromatograms analyzed using the Agilent Technologies Chemstation Software.

2.2.4. Vitamin Analysis

Vitamin C was determined in tubers as previously described [14, 15]. An aliquot of 25 g of tigernut was added to 25 mL of a solution containing 45 g/L metaphosphoric acid and 7.2 g/L of DL-1,4-dithiotreitol (DTT). The mixture was homogenized and centrifuged at 22,100 g for 15 min at 4°C. The supernatant was vacuum-filtered through Whatman no. 1 filter. Prior to HPLC analysis, the vacuum-filtered samples (10 mL) were passed through a Millipore 0.45 μm membrane. Then, 20 μL was injected into a HPLC system fitted with a reversed-phase column, C18 Spherisorb ODS2 (5 μm) stainless-steel column (4.6 mm × 250 cm). The mobile phase was a 0.01% sulphuric acid solution adjusted to a pH of 2.6, at a flow rate of 1 mL/min at room temperature. Detection was performed at 245 nm with 486 Absorbance Detector (Waters, Milford, MA). Vitamin C was quantified through a calibration curve built with ACS grade ascorbic acid (>99% pure, Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) pure standards in the range of 0.2–50 μg/mL.

To determine vitamin E (α-tocopherol) and β-carotene, approximately 5 g of ground samples were extracted with 50.0 mL of hexane. The mixture was then vortexed for 5 min and filtered using 0.2 μm pore size PTFE membrane. The filtered hexane fraction was directly injected into RP-HPLC system for β-carotene and vitamin E analysis [16]. The RP-HPLC system (Shimadzu) consisted of an autosampler and column oven equipped with Inertsil ODS-3V (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) reversed-phase column. For β-carotene analysis, mobile phase was acetonitrile (6 : 4, v/v, containing 0.05: BHA as antioxidant) (eluent A) and MeOH (eluent B). The following gradient was used: initial condition was 70% (A) and 30% (B) for 5 min, followed by 80% (A) and 20% (B) for 5 min, at a flow rate of 1.5 mL/min. Elution was monitored using a photodiode-array detector at 472 nm [17]. For vitamin E content, methanol mobile phase was used at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The α-tocopherol was detected by a Shimadzu SPD-10A (UV/VIS) detector (292 nm wavelength). Standards of β-carotene (≥97.0% purity, Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) and DL-α-tocopherol (≥96% purity, Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) ranging from 0.5 to 6.0 μg/mL and from 0.02 to 1.0 μg/mL were used for calibration.

2.2.5. Tuber Oil Fatty Acids Analysis

Fatty acid methyl esters were determined according to International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) method II.D.19 [18]. On hundred milligrams of extracted oils was saponified in a volumetric flask, with 1.2 mL of 0.5 M KOH in MeOH by heating and stirring under reflux for 5 min. After saponification oils were esterified by adding 1.2 mL 20% borontrifluoride through condenser and boiled for 2 min and then the flask was moved from the magnetic stirrer and fatty acid methyl esters were extracted by adding 1 mL of n-hexane. Saturated NaCl solution was added until the n-hexane is in the neck of volumetric flask, mixed carefully, flipped once or twice, and let settle for about 30 min. After separation the n-hexane phase was transferred to a vial for fatty acid methyl esters analysis. Gas chromatography (GC) of fatty acid methyl esters was performed using a Perkin Elmer GC-autosystem XL with a programmable temperature vaporizer (PTV) split-injector and a flame ionization detector (FID). Helium was used as carrier gas. The column temperature was initially maintained at 100°C for 2 min and then raised by 5°C/min to 225°C and finally held at 225°C for 16 min. The injection volume was 0.2 μL with a 1 : 100 split. The PTV injector was initially maintained at 50°C and immediately after the injection raised to 270°C. The FID was kept at 250°C. The capillary column employed was CP Sil 88 (Chrompak, Varian Instruments, Walnut Creek, CA; 50.0 m × 0.25 mm and 0.2 μm film thickness). The peaks were identified by comparing retention times with authentic fatty acid methyl esters. Quantification was based on the area under each fatty acid peak as compared to the total area of all fatty acid peaks.

2.2.6. Mineral Composition of Powered Tubers

The elements, Mg, P, Cr, Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn, Sr, Ca, K, and Cd, in digests were measured using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (Analyst 800, Perkin-Elmer) and/or a coupled plasma mass Spectrophotometer (ELAN DRCII Axial Field Technology, Perkin-Elmer). About 0.2 g of powered tuber was digested with 3 mL of HNO3 (65%) and 0.5 mL of H2O2 (30%) in a closed vessel microwave digestion system (MLS-ETHOS plus) and diluted to 50 mL with Millipore water. Digestion conditions for the microwave system were applied as follows: 2 min for 250 W, 2 min for 0 W, 6 min for 250 W, 5 min for 400 W, 8 min for 550 W, and vent for 8 min. A blank digest was carried out in the same way. Al, Si, S, and Cl were analysis by polarized Energy Dispersive X Ray Fluorescent (EDXRF), Spectro X-LAB 2000. Prior to analysis, 4 g of ground dried samples triplicate was pelleted by 5 tons using SpectroPess (Chemplex Industries, Inc.) and then pellets were analyzed using different excitation conditions with an EDXRF spectrometer [19]. Standard Reference Material 1568a rice flour was obtained from National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, USA, and was used as food reference material to evaluate the analytical methods.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

All samples were tested at least in duplicate in each analytical technique. The values of different parameters were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Comparison of means was performed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Wilcoxon’s multiple comparison tests. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to compare the physical and chemical data of 3 morphotypes of Cyperus esculentus tubers. PCA was carried out using the 33 physical and chemical variables which differed significantly between morphotypes. Principal component analysis (PCA) is used in exploratory analysis. It gives graphical representations of intersample and intervariable relationships and provides a way to reduce the complexity of the data. Statistical significance was set at the 5% level of probability using JMP In 5.1 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Morphological Variants

Tubers from five collection sites were grouped into three morphological variants on the basis of their color (yellow or black) and size (big or small tuber). Then three variants were identified: (1) yellow and big (morphotype 1), yellow and small (morphotype 2), and black and big (morphotype 3) (Table 1). Thus, tuber samples from Mangodara and Tiéfora were classified as morphotype 1, those from Loropéni and Ouéléni as morphotype 2, and those from Tangora as morphotype 3 (Figure 1).

ParametersMorphotype 1Morphotype 2Morphotype 3

Mean length (cm) 1.24 ± 0.05a0.98 ± 0.06b1.31 ± 0.06a
Mean width (cm) 0.97 ± 0.05a,b0.90 ± 0.08b1.19 ± 0.05a
1000 dried tubers (g) 814.3 ± 184.1a598.00 ± 115.00b1044.00 ± 394.60a
Moisture (g 100 g−1)5.19 ± 0.18a4.56 ± 0.22a4.99 ± 0.78a
Crude oil (g 100 g−1)26.14 ± 0.71b28.94 ± 0.37a24.91 ± 0.94c
Protein (g 100 g−1)3.47 ± 0.71a,b4.33 ± 0.6a3.3 ± 0.26b
Ash (g 100 g−1)1.81 ± 0.24a,b1.69 ± 0.21b2.21 ± 0.39a
Carbohydrates (g 100 g−1) 68.24 ± 1.28a,b64.73 ± 1.21b69.21 ± 1.30a

Values are means ± standard deviation for . Data in the same row followed by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
3.2. Physical Characteristics

The tuber characteristics of the three morphotypes of Cyperus esculentus are shown in Table 1. The moisture content was not significantly different () among the three morphotypes. Lengths were ranged from to  cm. Morphotype 2 tubers were significantly shorter than those of morphotypes 1 and 3. Morphotypes 1 and 3 had slightly bigger tubers than approximate average length (0.63 to 1.21 cm) found for tigernuts from other countries [5]. The width of the tuber and one thousand dried tuber weights varied from to  cm and from to  g, respectively. The tuber width of morphotype 2 was significantly lower than that of morphotype 3. Both morphotypes 1 and 3 had higher one-thousand-tuber weight than morphotype 2. The one-thousand-tuber weight seems to be more influenced by tuber width than length. One thousand weights of investigated tubers were far higher than those obtained for brown tubers by Coşkuner et al. [5] that showed how genetic diverse is C. esculentus cultivated around the world.

3.3. Proximate Composition

Crude oil contents of the three morphotypes varied from to  g 100 g−1 of dry weight (DW). Crude oil content was higher in morphotypes 2 followed by morphotype 1, with morphotype 3 as the lowest (Table 1).

Crude oil content of the three morphotypes reported in this paper is lower than those reported for black and brown tubers from Cameroon [20]. However, the lipid content values are similar to those of white tubers [21] and higher than the content of tigernut genotype from Spain reported by Alegría-Torán and Farré-Rovira [22]. The data reported indicate that the lipid content of tigernut is influenced by genetic material and geographical location. Protein levels in the three morphotypes ranged from to  g 100 g−1. The morphotype 2 protein content was significantly higher than morphotype 3. The levels of protein are not related to either colour or size. The protein content for the three morphotypes from Burkina Faso was very low compared to tubers from Cameroon [20], Nigeria [23], and Turkey [5]. The ash content of the three morphotypes was ranged between and  g 100 g−1. Morphotype 3 had significantly higher ash content than morphotype 2. No significant difference was found between morphotype 1 and the two other ones. The ash content of the three morphotypes is lower than those reported for black, brown, and yellow tubers [5, 20, 21]. Morphotypes 1 and 3 had similar carbohydrate content which was higher than that of morphotype 2. Tubers from Burkina Faso are richer in carbohydrates than those from Nigeria [7] and Spain [22].

3.4. Starch and Other Carbohydrate Contents

Starch, sucrose, fructose, and glucose contents of three morphotypes are reported in Table 2.

ParametersMorpho. 1Morpho. 2Morpho. 3

Starch30.54 ± 2.75a33.21 ± 1.1a30.54 ± 0.5a
Sucrose18.99 ± 0.56b17.98 ± 1.03b20.39 ± 1.15a
Fructose3.02 ± 0.37a3.59 ± 0.72a1.6 ± 0.69a
Glucose6.79 ± 1.34a6.33 ± 0.97a0 ± 0b

Values are means ± standard deviation for . Data in the same row followed by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).

The starch content of the three morphotypes ranged from to  g 100 g−1. It appeared that starch content was not significantly different among morphotypes. However, the values for the three morphotypes were slightly higher than those reported by Coşkuner et al. [5] and similar to data of Linssen et al. [24]. The tigernuts from Burkina Faso displayed to  g 100 g−1 of fructose with no significant difference among morphotypes. The sucrose and glucose contents of the three morphotypes ranged from to  g 100 g−1 and from 0 to  g 100 g−1, respectively. Morphotype 3 had significantly higher sucrose than morphotype 1 and morphotype 2, while glucose content was not detected. The sucrose content was within the range previously reported [5, 25]. Karacali [26] reported that the amount and composition of sugars vary according to fruit species, varieties, and ecological conditions, and technical and cultural practices affect the flavour. In addition, irrigation, harvest time, and storage conditions also affect the sugar composition of almond kernel [2729]. Regarding the taste of sugars, sucrose is sweeter than glucose, and fructose is sweeter than sucrose [30]. Balta et al. [31] reported a positive correlation between glucose and fructose contents and the sweet taste of almond. Yellow morphotypes (morphotypes 1 and 2) had higher glucose and fructose contents than black ones; they should be sweeter.

3.5. Vitamin Contents

The ascorbic acid, tocopherol, and β-carotene contents of the three morphotypes are shown in Table 3. Vitamins contents of the three morphotypes differed significantly. The ascorbic acid levels varied from to  mg 100 g−1 and were within the usual range for tubers and lower than that of nuts [32, 33]. The highest content of ascorbic acid was recorded with morphotype 2, followed by morphotypes 3 and 1.

ParametersMorph. 1Morph. 2Morph. 3

Vitamin C (mg 100 g−1)5.48 ± 1.05c26.78 ± 2.51a8.33 ± 1.83b
Vitamin E (µg 100 g−1)209.71 ± 1.30b270.56 ± 1.74a149.86 ± 1.94c
β-Carotene (µg 100 g−1)7.3 ± 0.57b6.13 ± 0.62c10.05 ± 1.79a

Values are means ± standard deviation for . Data in the same row followed by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).

Tocopherol content of three morphotypes ranged from to μg 100 g−1. The morphotype 2 tocopherol content was significantly higher than that of morphotype 1, which was also significantly higher than that of morphotype 3. The tocopherol content obtained in this study is lower than that reported in tigernut oil from Ghana [9].

β-Carotene content of three morphotypes varied from to μg 100 g−1. Morphotypes 2 and 3 had the lowest and the highest content, respectively. Burmeister et al. [34] reported higher β-carotene content compared to Burkinabe tubers.

3.6. Fatty Acid Composition

Oils of the three morphotype tubers contained high amounts of monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) (%), followed by saturated fatty acids (SUFAs) (%) and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) (%) (Table 4). The SUFA content of morphotype 2 was significantly lower than that of morphotypes 1 and 3. Morphotype 3 had significantly lowest PUFA content compared to morphotypes 1 and 2. The MUFA content was not significantly different among the morphotypes. The SUFA, MUFA, and PUFA proportions were similar to those previously reported [9]. However the tigernut studied here had better SUFA and PUFA content than those reported by Sánchez-Zapata et al. [3]. A total of seventeen fatty acids have been identified in each morphotype. Among the fatty acids, oleic acid (%), palmitic acid (%), linoleic acid (%), and stearic acid (%) were the most abundant fatty acids, in three morphotypes, as previously reported [5, 35].

Fatty acidsMorphotype 1Morphotype 2Morphotype 3

Myristic acid0.16 ± 0.03b0.14 ± 0b0.4 ± 0.24a
Pentadecanoic acid0.03 ± 0.03a0 ± 0a0.05 ± 0.05a
Palmitic acid15.81 ± 0.95a15.83 ± 0.32a15.22 ± 0.55a
Stearic acid4.73 ± 0.33b3.89 ± 0.15c5.36 ± 0.26a
Arachidic acid0.57 ± 0.03b0.55 ± 0.02b0.68 ± 0.01a
Behenic acid0.1 ± 0a0.09 ± 0.02a0.1 ± 0.01a
Lignoceric acid0.17 ± 0.01b0.15 ± 0.03b0.24 ± 0.02a
Palmitoleic acid0.40 ± 0.05a0.37 ± 0.04a0.53 ± 0.02a
cis-7-Hexadecenoic acid0.35 ± 0.05a0.33 ± 0.03a0.44 ± 0.2a
Heptadecenoic acid0 ± 0a0.03 ± 0.03a0.03 ± 0.03a
Oleic acid64.25 ± 1.99a65.42 ± 1.17a65.76 ± 1.8a
Vaccenic acid0.99 ± 0.14a0.99 ± 0.12a0.93 ± 0.11a
Eicosenoic acid0.25 ± 0.05a0.28 ± 0.06a0.37 ± 0.16a
Cetoleic acid0.05 ± 0.05a0.03 ± 0.03a0.09 ± 0.1a
Nervonic Acid0 ± 0a0.05 ± 0.05a0.05 ± 0.05a
Linoleic acid12.39 ± 0.72a12.07 ± 0.23a10.04 ± 0.37b
Linolenic acid0.14 ± 0.02b0.14 ± 0.01b0.17 ± 0.01a
Total saturated21.56 ± 0.71a20.65 ± 0.38b22.03 ± 1.11a
Total monounsaturated65.91 ± 1.75a67.15 ± 1.21a67.75 ± 1.41a
Total n-6 PUFA12.39 ± 0.72a12.07 ± 0.23a10.04 ± 0.37b
Total n-3 PUFA0.14 ± 0.02b0.14 ± 0.01b0.17 ± 0.01a
Total PUFA12.53 ± 0.73a12.21 ± 0.23a10.2 ± 0.36b

Values are means ± standard deviation for . Data in the same row followed by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
3.7. Mineral Contents

The three Cyperus esculentus morphotypes tubers appeared to be important sources of mineral (Table 5). The most abundant minerals were K, P, Si, Cl, S, and Mg and their content was significantly different at except for S and Mg. Some contaminants such Cr, Sr, and Cd were detected at low amounts.

ParametersMorph. 1Morph. 2Morph. 3

Al34.35 ± 2.55b43.37 ± 6.13a39.86 ± 0.74a
Ca32.27 ± 5.66a19.09 ± 3.22b22.13 ± 1.64b
Cd0.01 ± 0.01a,b0.02 ± 0.01a0.01 ± 0b
Cl167 ± 0.53a155.4 ± 2.83b167.2 ± 5.51a
Cr1.65 ± 0.05a1.12 ± 0.31b0.18 ± 0.01c
Cu0.71 ± 0.03a0.48 ± 0.05b0.43 ± 0.01c
Fe11.44 ± 0.48a8.25 ± 1b3.57 ± 0.17c
K608.3 ± 97.84b556.9 ± 80.4b845.8 ± 7.94a
Mg100.5 ± 1.79a107.3 ± 8.2a102.2 ± 2.86a
Mn1.55 ± 0.44a1.44 ± 0.15a0.38 ± 0.02b
P229.6 ± 51.54a,b283.7 ± 14.96a236.4 ± 16.53b
S164.3 ± 18.23a194.1 ± 61.62a148.8 ± 8.39a
Si181.6 ± 50.35b242.5 ± 35.89a220.3 ± 47.32a,b
Sr0.36 ± 0.09a0.17 ± 0.02b0.19 ± 0.02b
Zn2.34 ± 0.31b1.88 ± 0.22b2.7 ± 0.03a

Values are means ± standard deviation for . Data in the same row followed by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).

Morphotype 1 was found to be richer in Ca, Cu, and Mn contents. Al, Mg, P, S, and Si were most abundant in morphotype 2. Morphotype 3 had the highest content of Cl, K, and Zn. The mineral compositions of the three morphotypes in the present study are different from those recorded with accessions from Niger, Nigeria, and Turkey [22, 35, 36]. Field observations of the soil type where the tigernuts are mainly growing showed that morphotype 1 is grown on more sandy soil, whereas morphotypes 2 and 3 are cultivated on soil with, respectively, more reddish and brownish clay. Therefore different mineral content can be due to differences in soil composition which can influence mineral uptake and storage in the tuber.

3.8. Principal Component Analysis

Principal component analysis (PCA) is used in exploratory analysis, which gives an overview of multivariate data [37]. A PCA using 33 physical and chemical variables showed clear differences among the three morphological types of tubers and gives a good overview of the characteristics of each type (Figure 2).

The first three principal components accounted for 82.27% of the total variation among the accessions. Most of the variation was explained by the first principal component (52%), followed by the second (22%) and the third (9%) (Table 6).


Crude oil−0.2050.1260.207−0.0360.0670.013
Vitamin C−0.1650.2590.0790.0110.1660.008
Vitamin E−0.1650.2590.0790.0110.1660.008
Myristic acid0.1770.087−0.156−0.0500.450−0.043
Stearic acid0.237−0.0620.073−0.0380.043−0.042
Arachidic acid0.2240.100−0.016−0.192−0.079−0.007
Individual %52.1421.788.345.665.332.46
Cumulative %52.1473.9382.2787.9293.2695.72

Loadings of the variables on the first two principal components show that the first component had high positive loadings from length, width, carbohydrate, sucrose, β-carotene, stearic acid, stearic acid, linoleic acid, total saturated fatty acids, and Zn and high negative loadings from lipids, linolenic acid, and Mn. The second component had high negative loadings from Cu, Sr, and Ca. Morphotype 1 had negative loadings in PC2 and was characterized by high Ca, Sr, Cu, and Fe contents whereas morphotype 2 showed positive scores in PC2 and had high protein, lipid, vitamin C, vitamin E, and P contents. Morphotype 3 was located in the positive side of PC1 and was characterized by the highest content of ash, β-carotene, and myristic, arachidic, and linolenic acids.

4. Conclusion

We present in this study the physical and chemical variability of tigernuts (Cyperus esculentus) cultivated in Burkina Faso. The data revealed that three Cyperus esculentus morphotypes are important source of macronutrients (starch, fat, and sucrose) and minerals (potassium, phosphorus, silicon, chlorine, sulfur, and magnesium). Some interesting differences were noticed such as the content of carbohydrates, starch, saturated fatty acids, and polyunsaturated fatty acids. The yellow morphotypes showed the highest content of fructose, glucose, and crude oil. Black morphotype was richer in carbohydrates with high content in sucrose whereas the yellow are source of fructose and glucose. These data revealed genetic variability among cultivated tigernuts from Burkina Faso and from others grown worldwide. Thus, tigernuts from Burkina Faso displayed particular composition which could be of great interest for nutritional quality and food processing.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors acknowledge the support by the government of Burkina Faso, DANIDA (Project no. 10-002AU), and FAO/IAEA, Plant Breeding and Genetics Laboratory.


  1. R. Govaerts, D. A. Simpson, J. Bruhl, P. Goetghebeur, and K. Wilson, Word Checklist of Cyperaceae: Sedges, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK, 2007.
  2. A. A. Omode, O. S. Fatoki, and K. A. Olaogun, “Physicochemical properties of some underexploited and nonconventional oilseeds,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 2850–2853, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. E. Sánchez-Zapata, J. Fernández-López, and J. Angel Pérez-Alvarez, “Tiger Nut (Cyperus esculentus) commercialization: health aspects, composition, properties, and food applications,” Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 366–377, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. A. Adejuyitan, “Tigernut processing: its food uses and health benefits,” American Journal of Food Technology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 197–201, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. Y. Coşkuner, R. Ercan, E. Karababa, and A. N. Nazlcan, “Physical and chemical properties of chufa (Cyperus esculentus L) tubers grown in the Çukurova region of Turkey,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 82, no. 6, pp. 625–631, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. Arafat, A. Gaafar, A. Basunu, and S. Nassef, “Chufa tubers (Cyperus esculentus L.): as a new source of food,” World Applied Sciences Journal, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 151–156, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  7. A. K. Oladele and J. O. Aina, “Chemical composition and functional properties of flour produced from two varieties of tiger nut (Cyperus esculentus),” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 6, no. 21, pp. 2473–2476, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  8. J. T. Barminas, H. M. Maina, S. Tahir, D. Kubmarawa, and K. Tsware, “A preliminary investigation into the biofuel characteristics of tigernut (Cyperus esculentus) oil,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 87–89, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. O. Yeboah, Y. C. Mitei, J. C. Ngila, L. Wessjohann, and J. Schmidt, “Compositional and structural studies of the oils from two edible seeds: Tiger nut, Cyperus esculentum, and asiato, Pachira insignis, from Ghana,” Food Research International, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 259–266, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. AOAC, Official Method for Analysis, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, USA, 15th edition, 1990.
  11. I. A. Nehdi, “Characteristics and composition of Washingtonia filifera (Linden ex André) H. Wendl. seed and seed oil,” Food Chemistry, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 197–202, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. AOAC, Official Method for Analysis, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, USA, 17th edition, 2000.
  13. M. M. Míguez Bernárdez, J. De la Montaña Miguélez, and J. García Queijeiro, “HPLC determination of sugars in varieties of chestnut fruits from Galicia (Spain),” Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 63–67, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. I. Odriozola-Serrano, T. Hernández-Jover, and O. Martín-Belloso, “Comparative evaluation of UV-HPLC methods and reducing agents to determine vitamin C in fruits,” Food Chemistry, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 1151–1158, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. G. Oms-Oliu, I. Odriozola-Serrano, R. Soliva-Fortuny, and O. Martín-Belloso, “Effects of high-intensity pulsed electric field processing conditions on lycopene, vitamin C and antioxidant capacity of watermelon juice,” Food Chemistry, vol. 115, no. 4, pp. 1312–1319, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. Azlan, K. N. Prasad, H. E. Khoo et al., “Comparison of fatty acids, vitamin E and physicochemical properties of Canarium odontophyllum Miq. (dabai), olive and palm oils,” Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 772–776, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J. Kubola, N. Meeso, and S. Siriamornpun, “Lycopene and beta carotene concentration in aril oil of gac (Momordica cochinchinensis Spreng) as influenced by aril-drying process and solvents extraction,” Food Research International, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 664–669, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. IUPAC, Standard Methods for the Analysis of Oils, Fats and Derivative, edited by P. Press, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK, 7th edition, 1979.
  19. E. Marguí, R. Padilla, M. Hidalgo, I. Queralt, and R. Van Grieken, “High-energy polarized-beam EDXRF for trace metal analysis of vegetation samples in environmental studies,” X-Ray Spectrometry, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 169–177, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. R. Ejoh and R. Ndjouenkeu, “Soaking behaviour and milky extraction performance of tiger nut (Cyperus esculentus) tubers,” Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 546–550, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. E. Addy and E. Eteshola, “Nutritive value of a mixture of Tigernut tubers (Cyperus esculentus L) and Baobab seeds (Adansonia digitata L.),” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 437–440, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  22. A. Alegría-Torán and R. Farré-Rovira, “Horchata y salud: aspectos nutricionales y dietéticos,” in Fundación Valenciana de Estudios Avanzados, J. Chufa and Horchata, Eds., pp. 55–70, Tradición y Salud, Valencia, Spain, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  23. V. J. Temple, T. Ojobeb, and M. M. Kapu, “Chemical analysis of tiger nut,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 261–263, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  24. J. P. H. Linssen, J. L. Cozijnsen, and W. Pilnik, “Chufa (Cyperus esculentus): a new source of dietary fibre,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 291–296, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. J. P. H. Linssen, J. D. van Olderen, and W. Pilnik, “Cyperus esculentus: voedingsmiddel of onkruid,” Voedingsmiddelentechnologi, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 24–26, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  26. I. Karacali, Storage and Marketing of Horticultural Crops, no. 494, Ege University Press, 1990 (Turkish).
  27. G. D. Nanos, I. Kazantzis, P. Kefalas, C. Petrakis, and G. G. Stavroulakis, “Irrigation and harvest time affect almond kernel quality and composition,” Scientia Horticulturae, vol. 96, no. 1–4, pp. 249–256, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. G. Nieddu, I. Chessa, M. Pala, and G. Lovicu, “Evaluation of almond germplasm in Sardinia: further observations,” Acta Horticulturae, vol. 373, pp. 135–139, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  29. I. Kazantzis, G. D. Nanos, and G. G. Stavroulakis, “Effect of harvest time and storage conditions on almond kernel oil and sugar composition,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 354–359, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. A. A. Kader, Fruits in the Global Market. Fruit Quality and Its Biological Basis, Sheffield Academic Press, CRC, London, UK, 2002.
  31. F. Balta, P. Battal, M. Fikret Balta, and H. I. Yoruk, “Free sugar compositions based on kernel taste in almond genotypes Prunus dulcis from Eastern Turkey,” Chemistry of Natural Compounds, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 221–224, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. A. I. R. N. A. Barros, F. M. Nunes, B. Gonalves, R. N. Bennett, and A. Paula, “Effect of cooking on total vitamin C contents and antioxidant activity of sweet chestnuts (Castanea sativa Mill.),” Food Chemistry, vol. 128, no. 1, pp. 165–172, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. V. Buono, A. Paradiso, F. Serio, M. Gonnella, L. De Gara, and P. Santamaria, “Tuber quality and nutritional components of ‘early’ potato subjected to chemical haulm desiccation,” Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 556–562, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. A. Burmeister, S. Bondiek, L. Apel, C. Kühne, S. Hillebrand, and P. Fleischmann, “Comparison of carotenoid and anthocyanin profiles of raw and boiled Solanum tuberosum and Solanum phureja tubers,” Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 865–872, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. R. H. Glew, R. S. Glew, L.-T. Chuang et al., “Amino acid, mineral and fatty acid content of pumpkin Seeds (Cucurbita spp) and Cyperus esculentus nuts in the Republic of Niger,” Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 51–56, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. M. M. Ozcan, A. Gumuscu, F. Er, D. Arslan, and B. Ozkalp, “Chemical and fatty acid composition of cyperus esculentus,” Chemistry of Natural Compounds, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 276–277, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. O. Baccouri, L. Cerretani, A. Bendini et al., “Preliminary chemical characterization of Tunisian monovarietal virgin olive oils and comparison with Sicilian ones,” European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, vol. 109, no. 12, pp. 1208–1217, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Souleymane Bado et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.