Journal of Chemistry

Journal of Chemistry / 2013 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 124659 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/124659

Hakan Arslan, Aydin Demircan, Gun Binzet, Ilhan Ozer Ilhan, "Vibrational Spectroscopy Investigation Using Ab Initio and Density Functional Theory Analysis on the Structure of tert-Butyl 3a-Chloroperhydro-2,6a-epoxyoxireno[e]isoindole-5-carboxylate", Journal of Chemistry, vol. 2013, Article ID 124659, 13 pages, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/124659

Vibrational Spectroscopy Investigation Using Ab Initio and Density Functional Theory Analysis on the Structure of tert-Butyl 3a-Chloroperhydro-2,6a-epoxyoxireno[e]isoindole-5-carboxylate

Academic Editor: Cherumuttathu H. Suresh
Received26 May 2012
Revised17 Jun 2012
Accepted21 Jun 2012
Published12 Sep 2012

Abstract

The molecular structure, vibrational frequencies, and infrared intensities of the tert-butyl 3a-chloroperhydro-2,6a-epoxyoxireno[e]isoindole-5-carboxylate were calculated by the HF and DFT (BLYP and B3LYP) methods using 6-31G(d) and 6-31G(d,p) basis sets. The FT infrared spectrum of the solid sample was measured under standard condition. We obtained two stable conformers for the title compound; however Conformer 1 is approximately 0.2 kcal/mol more stable than the Conformer 2. The comparison of the theoretical and experimental geometry of the title compound shows that the X-ray parameters fairly well reproduce the geometry of Conformer 2. Comparison of the observed fundamental vibrational frequencies of the title molecule and calculated results by HF and DFT methods indicates that B3LYP is superior for molecular vibrational problems. The harmonic vibrations computed by the B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) method are in a good agreement with the observed IR spectral data. Theoretical vibrational spectra of the title compound were interpreted by means of potential energy distributions (PEDs) using VEDA 4 program.

1. Introduction

Epoxides are used as an important intermediate tool in organic synthesis of fine chemicals and pharmaceuticals [1]. Intramolecular Diels-Alder (IMDA) reactions and epoxidation of its cycloadduct have also been of great interest in synthetic pathway of natural products, like conduritols [2], z-isomeric insect sex pheromone components [3], dihydrophenanthroline derivatives [4], vitamin D total synthesis [5], and so on. We have previously prepared a variety of key precursors to the intramolecular Diels-Alder reaction of furan (IMDAF) diene via facile alkylation of furan compounds and its protection. Subsequently IMDAF reaction carried out under thermal condition provided five- and six-membered heterocycles fused to an easily cleavable oxabicycloheptene moiety [69].

In this study, tert-butyl 3a-chloroperhydro-2,6a-epoxyoxireno[e]isoindole-5-carboxylate, 3, was prepared from 5-chloro-10-oxa-3-aza-tricyclo[5.2.1.01,5]dec-8-en-3-carboxylic acid tert-butyl ester, 1, using meta-chloroperbenzoic acid, 2, in dry dichloromethane which was previously recrystallized in dry diethyl ether at 0°C. The product 3 was analyzed by X-ray diffractometer [10], 1H and 13C NMR, IR, mass spectrometer, and elemental analysis. The goal of this project is to transferring chloro-cycloadduct, 3, to highly substituted tetrahydroisoindole derivative, 4. We are currently researching this stage by opening epoxy bridges on compound 3 (Scheme 1).

124659.sch.001

The crystal structure of tert-butyl 3a-chloroperhydro-2,6a-epoxyoxireno[e]isoindole-5-carboxylate (TBCEIC) has been determined by X-ray diffraction [10], however so far no ab initio studies have been made on the conformation and vibrational spectra of the title compound in the gas phase. In the present study, we have synthesized and calculated the vibrational frequencies and geometric parameters of TBCEIC in the ground state to distinguish the fundamentals from the experimental vibrational frequencies and geometric parameters, by using the Hartree-Fock [11] and density functional using B3LYP [12, 13] and Becke’s exchange functional in combination with the Lee, Yang, and Parr correlation functional methods [13, 14] (BLYP) with the standard 6-31G(d) and 6-31G(d,p) basis sets. In continuation of our theoretical studies, in the present work, we checked the relative performance of B3LYP and BLYP methods, as well as of HF for comparison, at the 6-31G(d) and 6-31G(d,p) levels taking as a test compound tert-butyl 3a-chloroperhydro-2,6a-epoxyoxireno[e]isoindole-5-carboxylate.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Conformational Stability

We performed full geometry optimization of the title compound. To establish the most stable conformation as the initial point for further calculations, the molecule was submitted to a rigorous conformation analysis around all bonds having free rotation. This study was performed with the software Spartan 06 [15, 16]. The structure of the title compound has two conformations which are shown in Figure 1. For comparison, the total energy and the relative energies of both conformer of the title compound are given in Table 1. Energetics show that Conformer 1 is the most stable. But comparison of the theoretical and experimental geometry of the title compound shows that the X-ray parameters fairly well reproduce the geometry of Conformer 2. Therefore, we will focus on this particular form (Conformer 2) of the title compound in this paper.


Conformer 𝐸 (au)Δ 𝐸 (kcal/mol)Dipole (debye)

Conformer 1 −1322.05349 0.0 1.5
Conformer 2 −1322.05323 0.2 3.9

2.2. Molecular Geometry

The optimized structure parameters of the title compound calculated by ab initio and DFT method listed in Table 2 are in accordance with atom numbering scheme given in Figure 2(a). The crystal and molecular structure of the title compound have been reported previously [10]. The geometric structure is monoclinic, the space group P21/c, with the cell dimensions: Å, Å, Å, , and  Å3 (Figure 2(b)). The structure parameters obtained by X-ray single-crystal diffraction method are given in Table 2. Also, Table 2 compares the calculated geometric parameters with the experimental data.


Parametersa,bExperimentalcCalculated
H F B L Y P B 3 L Y P
6-31G(d)6-31G(d,p)6-31G(d)6-31G(d,p)6-31G(d)6-31G(d,p)

Bond lengths (Å)
 R (10,16)1.800 (2)1.8061.8071.8651.8651.8341.834
 R (11,15)1.210 (3)1.1991.2001.2351.2351.2221.223
 R (12,19)1.446 (3)1.4111.4101.4591.4591.4381.439
 R (12,21)1.432 (2)1.4091.4091.4571.4581.4361.437
 R (13,15)1.339 (3)1.3511.3491.3781.3791.3641.365
 R (13,18)1.459 (3)1.4561.4581.4791.4811.4671.466
 R (13,22)1.453 (3)1.4541.4551.4761.4771.4621.463
 R (14,20)1.442 (3)1.4011.4011.4531.4541.4331.432
 R (14,25)1.440 (3)1.4011.4011.4521.4521.4311.431
 R (15,17)1.342 (3)1.3251.3251.3781.3781.3571.356
 R (16,21)1.548 (3)1.5491.5501.5801.5791.5661.566
 R (16,22)1.514 (3)1.5321.5301.5471.5471.5361.535
 R (16,24)1.538 (3)1.5501.5491.5661.5661.5531.554
 R (17,23)1.463 (3)1.4481.4491.4951.4961.4721.472
 R (18,21)1.501 (3)1.5121.5121.5251.5261.5161.517
 R (19,24)1.536 (4)1.5471.5471.5671.5681.5561.556
 R (19,25)1.509 (4)1.5271.5261.5471.5481.5351.536
 R (20,21)1.516 (3)1.5261.5241.5451.5451.5331.532
 R (20,25)1.450 (3)1.4491.4491.4801.4801.4671.468
 R (23,26)1.508 (4)1.5261.5251.5431.5411.5311.531
 R (23,30)1.502 (4)1.5271.5261.5431.5431.5311.531
 R (23,34)1.502 (4)1.5271.5271.5441.5421.5321.532
𝑟 0.98680.98710.99610.99620.99510.9950
Bond angles (°)
 A (19,12,21)96.88 (15)99.099.097.697.698.098.0
 A (15,13,18)120.21 (17)120.1120.1120.0119.7120.0119.9
 A (15,13,22)127.19 (17)125.5125.6126.1126.3126.0126.3
 A (18,13,22)112.59 (16)114.1114.0113.8113.3113.8113.6
 A (11,15,13)123.6 (2)122.9122.9123.0122.9123.1122.9
 A (11,15,17)125.62 (19)125.7125.7127.1127.0126.6126.5
 A (13,15,17)110.82 (18)111.3111.4109.9110.1110.4110.6
 A (10,16,21)110.36 (14)112.7112.7112.2112.0112.2112.1
 A (10,16,22)108.77 (16)109.5109.6109.2109.1109.4109.3
 A (10,16,24)113.45 (17)113.0112.9112.4112.4112.7112.8
 A (21,16,22)101.95 (16)101.7101.7102.0101.8101.8101.6
 A (21,16,24)102.96 (17)102.2102.2102.7102.7102.5102.5
 A (22,16,24)118.4 (2)117.0117.0117.8118.1117.4117.8
 A (15,17,23)120.50 (18)122.7122.7120.2120.1120.8120.7
 A (13,18,21)103.57 (16)102.8102.8103.3103.5103.2103.3
 A (12,19,24)102.19 (18)101.7101.7101.9101.8101.9101.9
 A (12,19,25)101.94 (19)101.9101.9102.1102.1102.0102.1
 A (24,19,25)107.8 (2)107.2107.2107.6107.4107.3107.2
 A (14,20,21)114.0 (2)113.1113.1113.7113.6113.5 113.5 
 A (21,20,25)102.9 (2)102.8102.8103.0103.0102.8102.9
 A (12,21,16)99.80 (15)98.798.698.598.498.898.7
 A (12,21,18)112.54 (17)112.2112.2111.6111.7111.8111.9
 A (12,21,20)102.24 (16)102.2102.3102.4102.5102.5102.5
 A (16,21,18)106.95 (16)106.7106.7106.8106.8106.7106.7
 A (16,21,20)108.39 (16)109.9109.9109.6109.7109.4109.5
 A (18,21,20)124.24 (19)124.3124.2124.8124.7124.7124.5
 A (13,22,16)103.32 (17)103.2103.2103.7103.7103.6103.5
 A (17,23,26)102.1 (2)102.6102.6102.1102.1102.4102.5
 A (17,23,30)110.0 (2)110.3110.3109.8110.0109.9110.1
 A (17,23,34)110.0 (2)110.3110.2110.1109.7110.2109.9
 A (26,23,30)111.1 (3)110.4110.5111.0110.9110.8110.8
 A (26,23,34)110.5 (3)110.5110.6110.8111.0110.7110.8
 A (30,23,34)112.7 (3)112.3112.3112.6112.5112.4112.3
 A (16,24,19)100.05 (3)99.899.9100.2100.3100.2100.2
 A (19,25,20)104.00 (19)103.6103.6103.7103.7103.6103.6
𝑟 0.99290.99290.99610.99660.99640.9969

aThe  atom numbering scheme of the molecular structure is given in Figure 2(a).
br: correlation coefficient between optimized and experimental geometrical parameters.
cFrom [10].

Based on this comparison, the bond lengths and angles calculated for the title compound show good agreement with experiment. However, according to our calculations, the optimized both bond lengths and bond angles obtained by DFT methods show the best agreement with the experimental values. The large difference between experimental and calculated DFT/B3LYP-6-31G(d,p) bond length and bond angle is 0.065 Å and 1.65 °, respectively.

2.3. Vibrational Assignments

Table 3 lists the wavenumbers of the bands observed in the FT-IR spectra of the tert-butyl 3a-chloroperhydro-2,6a-epoxyoxireno[e]isoindole-5-carboxylate. The theoretical frequencies and infrared intensities calculated by HF, BLYP, and B3LYP methods of the title compound are gathered in Table 3. The last column of Table 3 shows the detailed vibrational assignment obtained from the calculated potential energy distribution (PED).


HFBLYPB3LYP
NumberExp.6-31G(d)6-31G(d,p)6-31G(d)6-31G(d,p)6-31G(d)6-31G(d,p)IR intensityAssignments, PED (%)b
UnscalSca.Sca.UnscalSca.Sca.UnscalSca.Sca.UnscalSca.Sca.UnscalSca.Sca.UnscalSca.Sca.Abs.Rel.

1308234183067306033973065305531343100311731313102315432263093310132183093309430ν CH, C20, 96
23067338630383031336330353024310030663083309530663117319430623071318430603061142ν CH, C25, 95
3306733422999299233232999298830903056307330943065311631743043305131733050305171ν CH3, asym, C30, C34, 88
4306733372995298833202996298530863052306930893060311131703039304831683045304630ν CH3, asym, C30, C34, 90
5301033362994298733162992298230733039305630813052310331583027303631593036303730ν CH2, a sym, C22, 94
63010333429922985331129882977306830343051306630373088315530253033314930273027264ν CH, C19, 92
7301033102970296332942972296230573024304030603031308231433013302231423020302161ν CH2, asym, C24, 91
83003330929692963329029692958305230193035305430253076313630063015313430123013507ν CH3, asym, C26, 92
93003328829512944327229532942305130183034305230233074313330033012313130093010304ν CH3, asym, C26, 95
103003328629492942327129522941303630033019304130123063312029913000312029993000183ν CH3, asym, C26, C30, C34, 92
11300332712935292932562938292830343001301730393010306131182989299831182997299871ν CH3, asym, C30, C34, 97
12300332692933292732542936292630252992300830232995304531162987299631102989299071ν CH2, asym, C18, 96
132972326129262920324329262916301129782994301129833033309429662975308929692970152ν CH2, sym, C24, 97
142964325629222915323529192909298529522969298729593009307229452953306929502951152ν CH2, sym, C18, 95
152928324129082902322029062895298429512968298529573006306429372946306029412942233ν CH3, sym, C26, C30, C34, 91
162928322328922886320328902880297829452962297829502999305729312939305229332934233ν CH3, sym, C30, C34, 90
172928321328832877319328812871297629432960297629482997305629302938305129332933101ν CH3, sym, C26, C30, C34, 89
182928321228822876319228802870295229202936295529272976304529192927304229242925304ν CH2, sym, C22, 95
19168619411742173819391750174417041685169517001684171217841710171517811712171238457ν C=O, C15-O11, 82
201474167215001497165714951490151915021511150714931518155714931497154314831483172δ CH3, deform., C26, C30, C34, 64
21146016691498149416531492148614971481148914831469149415381474147915191460146010δ CH2, sciss., C18, C22, 51
22146016591489148516431483147714961480148814771463148815341471147515191460146041δ CH2, sciss., C18, C22, 66
23145116521482147916361476147114871471147914711457148215271464146815111452145330δ CH2, sciss., C18, C22, 56
241451164514761473162914701465148514691477147114571482152414611465150814491450162δ CH3, deform., C30, C34, 58
25145116431474147116261467146214841468147614691455148015211458146215071448144930δ CH3, deform., C26, C30, 68
26143116371469146616201462145714821466147414671453147815191456146015011443144300δ CH3, deform., C26, C34, 70
27143116361468146516191461145614751459146714591445147015151452145714991441144181δ CH2, sciss., C24, 76
28142716191453144916011445144014621446145414471433145714991437144114831425142610δ CH3, deform., C26, C30, C34, 81
291409159714331430159414381433141614011408139813851408145513951399144513891389674100ν NC, N13-C15, 53
301392158514221419158314281423138713721379137413611384144313831387143813821382142δ CH3, umbrella, C26, C30, C34, 51
311360158414211418156914161411138013651372136613531376143513761380143113751376213 𝜈 C C , R 1 , R 2 , 4 0 + 𝛿 C C H , R 1 , 1 7
321360156014001397154513941389136613511358136413511374142713681372141213571357142 𝛿 C H 3 , u m b r e l l a , C 2 6 , C 3 0 , C 3 4 , 5 1
331350155913991396154413931388136213471355136113481371142213631367140813531354183 𝛿 C H 3 , u m b r e l l a , C 2 6 , C 3 0 , C 3 4 , 6 4
341350154613871384153813881383135013351343133913261349140313451349139413401340233 𝛿 C H 2 , w a g g . , C 1 8 , 5 2
351327152113651362151313651360133513201328132813161338138313261330137613231323101 𝛿 C H 2 , w a g g . , C 2 2 , 4 0
36130514831331132814771333132812921278128512901278129913401285128813371285128520 𝛿 C H , R 1 , R 2 , 6 2
37128214721321131814641321131612801266127312771265128613321277128113281276127761 𝛿 C H 2 , t w i s t , C 1 8 , 6 0 + 𝜈 C N , C 8 - N 1 3 , 1 0
38125914541305130214491308130312681254126112621250127113211266127013151264126451 𝛿 C H , R 1 , R 2 , R 3 , 3 3
391247142012741271141412761271124612321239124312311252129312401243128812381238264 𝜈 C C , C 2 3 - C 2 6 , 2 6
401228140812631261140112641260123612221229123012181239128312301233127812281229152 𝛿 C H , d e f o r m . , 2 7 + 𝛿 C H 2 , w a g g . , C 2 4 , 2 7
411222139512521249138712521247123312201226122912171238128212291233127512251226152 𝜈 C C , C 2 3 - C 3 0 , 1 7 + 𝜈 C C , C 2 3 - C 3 4 , 1 8
42121113911248124513871252124712111198120412091198121812641212121512621213121391 𝜈 C C , R 1 , R 2 , R 3 , 2 5 + 𝜈 N C , 5 3
431211137412331230136712341229121011971203120511941214125612041208125012011202223 𝛿 C H 2 , t w i s t , C 2 2 , C 2 4 , 6 0
441180136612261223136212291225119811851191119111801200124611941198124211941194274 𝛿 C H 2 , t w i s t , C 2 2 , 1 9 + 𝛿 C C H , C 2 0 , C 2 5 , 1 0
45118013641224122113581225122111931180118611891178119812411190119312341186118641 𝛿 C H 2 , t w i s t , C 1 8 , 4 6 + 𝜈 C O , R 1 , 2 3
46118013541215121213491217121311781165117211701159117812291178118212241176117791 𝜈 C C , 2 5 + 𝜈 C - O , C 2 3 , 4 5 + 𝛿 C H 2 , t w i s t , C 1 8 , 1 0
471163133611991196132911991195117111581165116711561175121811681171121311661166345 𝜈 C C , 3 0 + 𝛿 C H 2 , t w i s t , C 2 4 , 3 0
48116313301193119113241195119111611148115511541143116212101160116312041157115837255 𝛿 C C H , 3 1 + 𝛿 C H 2 , t w i s t , C 1 8 , C 2 4 , C 2 2 , 3 0
49112812891157115412871161115711001088109410931083110111521104110811501105110611217 𝜈 C C , C 1 6 - C 2 1 , 1 2 + 𝜈 C - O , C 1 5 - O 1 7 , 1 2
50110912691139113612661142113810891077108310871077109511441097110011381094109441 𝜈 C C , R 3 , 3 0 + 𝛿 C H 2 , r o c k i n g , C 1 8 , C 2 4 , 2 8
511089124711191116124311221118107510631069106810581076114010931096113210881088345 𝜈 C C , R 3 , 1 6 + 𝛿 C H 2 , r o c k i n g , C 1 8 , C 2 2 , 1 4
521061121910941091121610971093105010391044104410341052109610511054109210501050162 𝛿 C H 2 , r o c k i n g , C 1 8 , C 2 2 , C 2 4 , 5 0
531045121210881085121010921088104010291034103410241041108010351038108010381038223 𝜈 C C , R 1 , R 2 , R 3 , 4 7
54103311771056105411741059105610301019102410261016103310691025102810631022102210 𝛿 C H 3 , r o c k i n g , 3 9
55100511741054105111711057105310241013101810241014103110621018102110571016101600 𝛿 C H 3 , r o c k i n g , 2 9
56100511601041103911531040103710161005101010079981014106110171020105410131013183 𝛿 C H 2 , r o c k i n g , C 2 2 , C 2 4 , 1 7 + 𝛿 C C H , 2 1
5799311571038103611501038103498697598198497599110389959981038998998345 𝜈 C C , R 1 , 1 7 + 𝜈 C O , R 2 , 1 7 + 𝛿 C C H , 1 5
589601128101210101126101610129649539599619529681014972975101297397371 𝛿 C H 3 , d e f o r m , C 2 6 , C 3 0 , C 3 4 , 9 0
5994711099959931105997994953943948947938954995954957990952952426 𝜈 C C , 2 9 + 𝛿 C C H , R 1 , R 2 , 2 9
609281067957955106596195894193193693592694297993994197293493400 𝜈 C C , C 2 4 C 1 9 , 3 8 + 𝛿 C C H , C H 3 r o c k i n g , 1 0
6192810629539511054951948910900905907898914961921924958921921112 𝜈 C C , C - C H 3 , 4 1
6292010269219191023923920904894899901893907945906909942905906142 𝛿 C H 3 , r o c k i n g , 6 2
639101014910908101091190890289289789989190593689790093289689620 𝜈 C C H 3 , 2 2 + 𝛿 C C H , C H 3 , 1 9
649101012908906100790990590189189689688890293489589892989389300 𝜈 C C H 3 , 3 8 + 𝛿 C C H , C H 3 , 2 4
6588310099059031006908905870860865863855869910872875907872872162 𝜈 C O , R 1 , 1 4 + 𝜈 C C , R 1 , R 2 , 1 4 + 𝛿 C H 2 , r o c k i n g , C 2 4 , 1 3
6687399789589399389689385784885285584786190787087290286786771 𝛿 C C H , 2 0 + 𝛿 C H 2 , r o c k i n g , C 1 9
67862984883881981885882841832836839831845892855858891856857426 𝜈 C N , R 3 , 1 4 + 𝜈 C O , C 2 3 - O 1 7 , 1 3
68852977877875974879876828819823830822836877841843878844844274 𝛿 C H 2 , r o c k i n g , C 2 4 , 2 1 + 𝛿 C C H , 1 0
69835956858856955862859817808813816808822868832834867833834112 𝜈 C C , 1 4 + 𝛿 C C H , 1 8
7082594284584394084884581080180680880081485481982185281981930 𝛿 C C H , 1 4 + 𝛿 C C C , 1 2 + 𝛿 C O C , 1 2
7180892082682491882882579278378879178479783580080383380180191 𝛿 C C C , 1 3 + 𝛿 C C H , 1 3
72764899807805898810807779770775777770783817783785815783784213 𝛿 C C H , 3 5 + 𝛿 C C C , 3 4
7375087578578387579078774373573974373674877874674877774774730 𝛿 C O C , 1 1 + 𝜈 C O , 1 0 + 𝛿 C C C , 1 0
7472984776075884676376172671872272571873076072973175772872851 𝛿 C C C , 2 0 + 𝜈 C C , 1 8
75729818734732817737735712704708707700712757726728755726726213 𝛾 C , C 1 5 , 4 0
76685812729727811732729696688692692686697736706708732704704284 𝜈 C C l , 2 0 + 𝛿 C C C , 1 8
77633737661660737665663653646649654648659681653655681655655101 𝛿 C C C , 2 4
78582675606604674608606589583586589583593617591593617593593102 𝛾 C , 2 1 + 𝜈 C C , 2 1
79546641575574640578575563557560560555564588564565586563563132 𝛿 C C O , 2 6
8052456250450356250750549949449650149650552049950052050050051 𝛿 C C C , 2 0 + 𝛿 C C N , 2 0
81053748248153748548346946446646946547249047047149047147141 𝛿 C C O , 2 8 + 𝛿 C C N , 2 4
82052747347252747647445945445646145746448246246348246346330 𝛿 C C O , 2 0 + 𝛿 C C C , 2 2 + 𝜈 C C l , 2 0
83049544444349544744544544044344143744446144244345944144130 𝛾 C , 2 5 + 𝛿 C C C , 1 6
84047742842747743042942141641942542142843741942044042342341 𝛾 C , 1 7
85044339839744239939738538138338938539240338638740438838841 𝛾 C , 1 8 + 𝛿 C C C , 1 8
86042938538442938738638137737938237838539838238340038438510 𝛿 C C C , 3 4
87038834834738835034933933533734033734235233733835333933920 𝛾 C , 2 6
88037633733737734033933733333533533233735033633634933533610 𝛿 C C C , 5 7 + 𝜏 C C , 1 5
890358321321358323322320316318324321326332318319334321321162 𝛿 C N C , 1 1 + 𝛿 C O C , 4 6
90034130630534130830730530230330530230731630330431530330310 𝜏 C N , 2 6 + 𝜏 C C , 1 3 + 𝛾 C , 1 3
91033630230133630330229929629729929630131129829931129929920 𝜏 C C , 2 0 + 𝛾 C , 1 0
92031127927831128128027226927127226927428327127228327227241 𝜏 C C , 2 1 + 𝛾 C , 1 6
93030527427330327327226826526727026727227726626626825825800 𝛿 C C H , 1 0 + 𝜏 C C , 7 6
94027524724627424724625925625825024825226325225324623623700 𝜏 C C , 1 3 + 𝜏 C O 1 2 + 𝜏 C N , 1 2
95023921421423921621521321121221621421822221321322421521541 𝜏 C C , 3 1
96023320920923020820720420220321020821221220320421520720720 𝜏 C N , 2 0 + 𝛿 C O N , 1 8 + 𝛿 C C C , 2 0
97022720420322820620520119920019719519820819920020019219200 𝜏 C C H 3 , 6 5
98019717717619717817716216016116916717017116416417717017010 𝜏 C C , 3 3 + 𝜏 C N , 3 2
99018616716718616816715715515616115916217016316316916216200 𝜏 C N , 1 3 + 𝜏 C C , 1 6
100014813313314813413313613513513613513714113513613913413410 𝜏 C C H 3 , 4 7
101012311011012311111110810710711010911111310810911310910920 𝜏 C C , R 1 , R 2 , R 3 , 4 8
102086777786787779787980798181787882797900 𝛿 N C O , N 1 3 - C 1 5 - O 1 7 , 4 9
103074666674676765646565646567646465626220 𝜏 𝐶 𝑂 , C 1 5 - O 1 7 , 5 9
104044393944404043434346464643414146444400 𝜏 𝐶 𝑁 , C 1 5 - N 1 3 , 5 0
105022202021191919191914141418171711111100 𝜏 𝐶 𝑁 , 𝐶 1 5 𝑁 1 3 , 4 5
r0.99970.99970.99970.99970.99970.99970.99980.99980.99980.99980.99980.99980.99990.99990.99990.99990.99990.9999
Mean deviation190.4914.5511.01181.4915.059.6012.73 −4.08 4.278.49 −5.89 19.5266.710.965.3261.31 −0.24 0.13
Mean absolute deviation190.4934.3334.02181.4934.9334.3721.2315.7517.120.2416.2226.0066.8110.9911.5661.419.699.67
Average absolute error13.612.692.5713.082.772.591.481.391.361.411.421.614.470.960.994.070.860.86
RMSmol201.9537.4037.61191.4737.9438.4326.6518.4920.8125.4019.3734.9176.0413.4014.2971.2012.3412.34
RMSover176.2832.6532.83167.1333.1133.5423.2616.1418.1622.1716.9130.4866.3711.712.4762.1510.7710.77
Scaling factor1.0000.89740.89531.0000.90240.89921.0000.98910.99451.0000.99061.00721.0000.95870.96141.0000.96120.9614

aHarmonic frequencies (in cm−1) and IR intensities (km/mol).
bν: stretching; 𝛿 : in-plane bending; 𝛾 : out-of-plane bending; 𝜏 : torsion; sym: symmetric; asym: asymmetric; R1: C19-O12-C21-C20-C25; R2: C19-O12-C21-C16-C24; R3: C16-C21-C18-N13-C22. PED less than 10% are not shown.

Comparison of the frequencies calculated at HF, BLYP, and B3LYP with experimental values reveals the overestimation of the calculated vibrational modes due to neglect of anharmonicity in real system. Inclusion of electron correlation in density functional theory to a certain extent makes the frequency values lower in comparison with the Hartree-Fock frequency data [1720]. Reductions in the computed harmonic vibrations, though basis set sensitives are only marginal as observed in the DFT values using 6-31G(d) and 6-31G(d,p). Any way notwithstanding the level of calculations, it is customary to scale down the calculated harmonic frequencies in order to improve the agreement with the experiment [1720]. Therefore, the scaling factor values of 0.8953/0.8992, 0.9614/0.9614, and 0.9945/1.0072 for HF, B3LYP, and BLYP (6-31G (d)/6-31G(d,p)), respectively, are used in our study [17, 2125]. Experimental fundamentals are in better agreement with the scaled fundamentals which are found to have a good correlation for DFT/B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) () than HF method. The calculated frequencies (scaled) do not differ so much from the experimental ones that the maximum difference between two spectra is not more than 27 cm−1 for DFT/B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) method. Also, the average absolute error of the calculated frequencies was found less than 0.86% for DFT/B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) method.

A general better performance of B3LYP and BLYP versus HF can be quantitatively characterized by using the mean deviation, mean absolute deviation, average absolute error, root mean square values, and coefficients of correlation () between the calculated and observed vibration frequencies and given in Table 3. All these values were calculated in this study by the PAVF 1.0 program [26] according to Scott and Radom [21]. The root mean square (RMS) values were obtained in this study using the following expression [21]: The values for both DFT methods were greater than 0.9998, whereas for HF it was 0.9997. These values are very close to those reported in the literature [2733]. These results indicate that the B3LYP calculations approximate the observed fundamental frequencies much be better than the HF results. The small difference between experimental and calculated vibrational modes is observed. It must be due to the fact that hydrogen bond vibrations present in crystal lead to strong perturbation of the infrared frequencies (and intensities) of many other modes. Also, we state that the experimental results belong to solid phase and theoretical calculations belong to gaseous phase [17, 19, 20, 2325, 3034].

Finally, we calculated the optimal scaling factors, which are crucial for IR spectral predictions, using the PAVF 1.0 program [26]. Without accounting for different vibrations, only single-uniform scaling factors were calculated. The values obtained are 0.8974/0.9024, 0.9587/0.9612, and 0.9891/0.9906 for the HF, B3LYP, and BLYP (6-31G(d)/6-31G(d,p)) methods, respectively. They are very close to those recommended by Scott and Radom [21] for the same levels of theory and increase in the same order of the HF, B3LYP and BLYP methods. Thus, for future IR spectral predictions for unknown derivatives of the title compound, one can recommend scaling factors of 0.897/0.902, 0.959/0.961, and 0.989/0.991 for the HF, B3LYP, and BLYP (6-31G(d)/6-31G(d,p)) methods, respectively.

The IR bands at 3082, 3067, and 3010 cm−1 in FT-IR spectrum of the title compound have been designated to νCH stretching fundamentals of C20, C25, and C19 atoms, respectively [23, 35, 36]. The wavenumbers corresponding to the aliphatic νCH stretching are listed in Table 3. All the calculated values in each method are overestimated, as well known in theoretical quantum mechanic assignment concerning hydrocarbons. After we applied the scale factor both calculated in this research and given by Scott and Radom [21] for all the methods, we observed a good concordance between the experimental and the calculated values. The vibrational spectra show six bands in the aliphatic νCH stretching region and evident overlap between the different C–H stretching modes. The asymmetric and the symmetric νC–H stretching bands for –CH2– group are listed in Table 3. These assignments were also supported by the literature [20, 23, 35, 37]. The in-plane and out-of-plane bending vibrations of C–H group have also been identified for the title compound and they are presented in Table 3.

The carbonyl stretching vibrations are found in the region 1780–1700 cm−1 [38, 39]. The sharp intense band in IR spectrum at 1686 cm−1 can be assigned to the carbonyl group νC=O stretching vibration.

The vibrational modes concerning the bond angle bending (–CH2–), scissoring, wagging, twisting, and rocking are well defined in all the calculations. As seen from Table 3, the bands observed at 1460, 1451, and 1431 cm−1 in FT-IR spectrum correspond to scissoring deformation of –C(18)H2–, –C(22)H2– and –C(24)H2– group in the title compound, respectively [37, 40]. The theoretically computed values of scissoring deformation vibration modes show a good agreement with the experimental values. The wagging, twisting, and rocking vibrational modes are distributed in a wide range [36, 37, 40, 41]. Twisting and wagging vibrational modes of the –CH2– groups were assigned in the range of 1350–1163 cm−1. The above result is in close agreement with the literature values [36, 37, 4042]. These vibrational modes are described in the tables by mean of the general symbol δCH2. The rocking –CH2– is assigned in the wavenumber range of 1109–852 cm−1, and the wavenumber shift of these bands is due to the atom nature in which the –CH2– group is bonded. The –CH2– rocking vibrational modes are generally intensive bands which can be appreciating the vibrational coupling with other vibrational modes [36, 37]. These bands are assigned using calculated potential energy distribution.

For the assignments of CH3 group frequencies, 15 fundamental vibrations can be associated to CH3 groups. Nine stretching, three umbrella, and three rocking vibration modes are designated the motion of the methyl group. The CH3 asymmetric and symmetric stretching frequencies are established at 3067, 3010, 3003, and 2923 cm−1 in infrared spectrum. The three methyl hydrogen deformation modes are also well established in the spectrum. We have observed the methyl deformation mode at 1474, 1451, 1431, and 1409 cm−1 in the infrared spectrum.

The C–C stretching vibrations in cyclic alkanes appeared as weak bands, so these vibrations are of little importance for structural study [43]. The IR bands appearing at 1360, 1247, 1222, 1211, 1180, 1163, 1128, 1109 1089, 1045, 993, 947, and 928 cm−1 were assigned to νCC vibrations coupled with the δCCH for the title compound. So, in our study, the C–C stretching vibrations are observed as medium-intensity bands. These results were confirmed by Gunasekaran et al. [44].

The identification of CN vibrations is a difficult task, since the mixing of vibrations is possible in CN stretching vibration frequencies region. However, with the help of both the animation option of Gaussian programs and theoretical calculations (VEDA 4), the CN vibrations are identified and assigned in this study. The IR bands appearing at 1409, 1282 and 1211 cm−1 are assigned to νCN vibrations. These results agree with Sundaraganesan et al. [45].

Epoxide group could be identified via its characteristic C–O stretching bands which gives two different absorption bands in the fingerprint region around ~800–950 and ~1250 cm−1, respectively [46, 47]. There is also a third band in the range 750–850 cm−1. The IR bands appearing at 1180, 993, and 883 cm−1 are assigned to C–O stretching vibrations. These results agree with Evtushenko et al. [47]. The difference between observed and literature values is coming from the effects of the aromatic rings.

The νC–Cl stretching vibrations give generally strong bands in the region of 710–505 cm−1. The band observed at 685 cm−1 in FT-IR spectrum has been assigned to νC–Cl stretching vibration in the present investigation [37].

2.4. Other Molecular Properties

Several calculated thermodynamic parameters are presented in Table 4. The total energies and the changes in the total entropy of the title compound at room temperature at different methods also presented.


Thermodynamic parameterHFBLYPB3LYP
6-31G(d)6-31G(d,p)6-31G(d)6-31G(d,p)6-31G(d)6-31G(d,p)

Total energy (a.u.) −1316.1201 −1316.1634 −1321.6722 −1321.6975 −1322.0277 −1322.0532
Zero-point vibrational energy (kcal/mol) 206.307 205.270 184.792 184.321 191.332 190.656
Entropy (cal/mol K)
 Total 130.140 130.324 138.036 130.906 135.418 128.758
 Translational 42.862 42.862 42.862 42.862 42.862 42.862
 Rotational 33.707 33.705 33.821 33.775 33.757 33.725
 Vibrational 53.571 53.758 61.353 54.269 58.799 52.170
Dipole moment (D) 4.4 4.4 3.8 3.7 4.0 3.9

3. Experimental

Dichloromethane (DCM) was distilled from calcium hydride. Reactions were monitored by thin layer chromatography (TLC) using precoated silica plates (Macherey Nagel sil G UV254). Compounds were visualized using ultraviolet fluorescence, alkaline potassium permanganate solution, or acidic cerium (IV) sulphate solution. Column chromatography was carried out using Macharey Nagel Kieselgel 60 (230–240 mesh).

3.1. Instrumentation

Melting points were determined using an Electrothermal-9300 Digital Melting Points Apparatus (Electrothermal Inc., Essex, UK). The 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a BrukerAvance DPX-400 spectrometer at the TÜBİTAK Analytical Laboratory (Ankara, Turkey). The chemical shifts are quoted in ppm, as δ values downfield of tetramethylsilane (TMS) or relative to the residual solvent resonance. Electron ionisation mass spectra (EI, 70 eV) were obtained on a Perkin Elmer Clarus 500 mass spectrometer. Elemental analysis was carried on LECO CHNS 932, TÜBİTAK Analytical Laboratory (Ankara, Turkey). The room-temperature-attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR ATR) spectrum of the tert-butyl 3a-chloroperhydro-2,6a-epoxyoxireno[e]isoindole-5-carboxylate was recorded using Varian FTS1000 FT-IR spectrometer with Diamond/ZnSe prism (4000–525 cm−1; number of scans: 250; resolution: 1 cm−1) in the solid (Figure 3).

3.2. Synthesis of tert-butyl 3a-chloroperhydro-2,6a-epoxyoxireno[e]isoindole-5-carboxylate

To a solution of meta-chloroperbenzoic acid (m-CPBA) (120 mg, 0.66 mmol), which had previously been purified and re-crystallized from dry diethyl ether, in dichloromethane (10 mL), cooled to 0 °C, was added dropwise a solution of tert-butyl 7a-chloro-1,6,7,7a-tetrahydro-3a,6-epoxyisoindole-2-carboxylate (0.66 mmol) in dichloromethane (10 mL) over a period of 3 min (Scheme 1). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4 h and then diluted with cold 4% sodium bicarbonate solution (4 mL). The organic layer was separated, washed with water ( mL), and concentrated in vacuum. The residue was subjected to flash column chromatography. As white crystal (110 mg, 56%). M.p.: 137–139 °C, TLC, (hexane: ethyl acetate (7 : 3)): Rf: 0.26. 1H NMR (400 MHz CDCl3) δ: 4.63 (d, 1H, H4, ), 4.01–3.73 (m, 4H, H7, H8), 3.75 (d, 1H, H3, , AB ), 3.52 (d, 1H, H2, , AB ), 2.52 (dd, 1H, H5, , , AB), 1.90 (d, 1H, H5, , AB), 1.45 (s, 9H, H11, H12, H13). 13C NMR (75 MHz CDCl3) δ: 154.0 (C9, q), 91.1 (C1, q), 80.2 (C10, q), 77.2 (C4), 75.3 (C6, q), 60.5 (C2), 49.1 (C7), 48.3 (C8), 45.3 (C5), 42.1 (C3), 28.4 (C11, C12, C13). GC-MS (m/z): 288 [M+, %100], 252 [M+–(Cl), %55], 213 [M+–(OtBu), % 45] 167 [M+–(C8H9N), %85]. Elemental analysis (%) for C13H18ClNO4: theoretical (experimental) C, 54.26 (54.03); H, 6.31 (6.15); N, 4.87 (4.71).

3.3. Calculations Details

The conformation analysis study was performed by Spartan 06 program package [15, 16]. All the other calculations were performed with the Gaussian 03W program package on a double xeon/3.2 GHz processor with 8 GB Ram [48]. The molecular structure of the title compound, in the ground state, is optimized by using HF, BLYP and B3LYP methods with the standard 6-31G(d) and 6-31G(d,p) basis sets. The vibrational frequencies were also calculated with these methods. The frequency values computed at these levels contain known systematic errors [2729, 4953]. Therefore, we have used the scaling factor for HF, B3LYP, and BLYP methods [17, 2125]. We have also calculated optimal scaling factors for all investigated methods. We have also calculated optimal scaling factors for all investigated methods. The assignment of the calculated wavenumbers is aided by the animation option of GaussView 3.0 graphical interface for gaussian programs, which gives a visual presentation of the shape of the vibrational modes [52]. Furthermore, theoretical vibrational spectra of the title compound were interpreted by means of potential energy distributions (PEDs) using VEDA 4 program [54].

4. Conclusions

The frequency assignment for the tert-butyl 3a-chloroperhydro-2,6a-epoxyoxireno[e]isoindole-5-carboxylate has been done for the first time from the FT-IR spectrum recorded. The conformation stability, equilibrium geometries, and harmonic frequencies of the title compound were determined and analyzed both at HF and DFT level of theories utilizing 6-31G(d) and 6-31G(d,p) basis sets. The difference between the observed and scaled wavenumber values of most of the fundamentals is very small. Any discrepancy noted between the observed and the calculated frequencies may be due to the fact that the calculations have been actually done on a single molecule in the gaseous state contrary to the experimental values recorded in the presence of intermolecular interactions. The IR spectrum of the title compound was interpreted in terms of the potential energy distribution (PED) analysis. Optimal uniform scaling factors were calculated for the title compound. Taking into account small variations of the scaling factors for the derivatives of the title compound, for future IR spectral predictions for unknown compounds of this class, one can recommend scaling factors of 0.897/0.902, 0.959/0.961, and 0.989/0.991 for HF, B3LYP, and BLYP (6-31G(d)/6-31G(d,p)), respectively.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to TÜBİTAK, The Scientific and Research Council of Turkey (Project no. 107T831), and Mersin University Research Fund (Project no. BAP.ECZ.F.TB.(HA).2006-1) for financial support of this work.

References

  1. R. Van Santen, in Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalysis, G. Ertl, H. Knözinger, and J. Weitkamp, Eds., vol. 5, p. 2244, John Wiley & Sons, Weinheim, Germany, 1997.
  2. R. Łysek and P. Vogel, “Synthesis of amino- and diaminoconduritols and their applications,” Tetrahedron, vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 2733–2768, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. V. I. Bykov, T. A. Butenko, E. B. Petrova, and E. S. Finkelshtein, “Synthesis of sub-units of marine polycyclic ethers by ring-closing metathesis and hydroboration of enol ethers,” Tetrahedron, vol. 55, no. 27, pp. 8249–8252, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. C. Sanfilippo and G. Nicolosi, “Lipase-catalysed kinetic resolution as the key step in the synthesis of a new class of optically active 5,6-trans-9,10-dihydrophenanthroline derivatives,” Tetrahedron Asymmetry, vol. 19, no. 18, pp. 2171–2176, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. P. Jankowski, S. Marczak, and J. Wicha, “Methods for the construction of trans-hydrindane rings and their origins in steroid chemistry. Vitamin D total synthesis,” Tetrahedron, vol. 54, no. 40, pp. 12071–12150, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  6. M. Karaarslan, E. Gokturk, and A. Demircan, “Thermal intramolecular Diels-Alder reaction of furan; synthesis of nitrogen tetracycles, isobenzofuran and isobenzothiophene,” Journal of Chemical Research, no. 2, pp. 117–120, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. Karaarslan and A. Demircan, “Preparation of heterotricyclic chlorides via intramolecular Diels-Alder reaction of furans,” Asian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 2999–3006, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  8. A. Demircan and P. J. Parsons, “Preparation of tricyclic nitrogen heterocycle via Intramolecular Diels-Alder reaction,” Heterocyclic Communications, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 531–536, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  9. A. Demircan, M. Karaarslan, and E. Turaç, “A facile synthesis of heterotricycles from furfurylbromoalkenes using thermal IMDA cycloaddition,” Heterocyclic Communications, vol. 12, no. 3-4, pp. 233–240, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  10. B. Kosar, M. Karaarslan, I. Demir, and O. Büyükgüngör, “tert-Butyl 3a-chloroperhydro-2,6a-epoxyoxireno[e]isoindole-5-carboxylate,” Acta Crystallographica Section E, vol. 63, no. 7, Article ID o3323, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. C. Møller and M. S. Plesset, “Note on an approximation treatment for many-electron systems,” Physical Review, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 618–622, 1934. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. A. D. Becke, “Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange,” Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 98, no. 7, pp. 5648–5652, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  13. C. Lee, W. Yang, and R. G. Parr, “Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density,” Physical Review B, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 785–789, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. A. D. Becke, “Density-functional exchange-energy approximation with correct asymptotic behavior,” Physical Review A, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 3098–3100, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. Y. Shao, L. F. Molnar, Y. Jung et al., “Advances in methods and algorithms in a modern quantum chemistry program package,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 8, no. 27, pp. 3172–3191, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. Y. Shao, L. F. Molnar, Y. Jung et al., Spartan 06, Wavefunction, Irvine, Calif, USA, 2006.
  17. H. Arslan, O. Algül, and T. Önkol, “Vibrational spectroscopy investigation using ab initio and density functional theory analysis on the structure of 3-(6-benzoyl-2-oxobenzo[d]oxazol-3(2H)-yl)propanoic acid,” Spectrochimica Acta—Part A, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 606–614, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. G. M. Chaban and R. B. Gerber, “Anharmonic vibrational spectroscopy calculations with electronic structure potentials: comparison of MP2 and DFT for organic molecules,” Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, vol. 120, no. 1–3, pp. 273–279, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. N. Sundaraganesan and B. Dominic Joshua, “Vibrational spectra and fundamental structural assignments from HF and DFT calculations of methyl benzoate,” Spectrochimica Acta—Part A, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 771–777, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. H. Arslan and A. Demircan, “Structure and vibrational frequencies of 6-chloro-8-thia-1,4- epoxybicyclo[4.3.0]non-2-ene: density functional theory study,” Molecular Simulation, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 567–574, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  21. A. P. Scott and L. Radom, “Harmonic vibrational frequencies: an evaluation of Hartree-Fock, Møller-Plesset, quadratic configuration interaction, density functional theory, and semiempirical scale factors,” Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 100, no. 41, pp. 16502–16513, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  22. NIST Computational Chemistry Comparison and Benchmark Database, NIST Standard Reference Database Number 101, Release 12, August 2005, Editor: Russell D. Johnson III, http://srdata.nist.gov/cccbdb.
  23. H. Arslan and A. Demircan, “The molecular structure and vibrational spectrum of 6-bromo-8-thia-1,4- epoxybicyclo[4.3.0]non-2-ene,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 1064–1082, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. H. Arslan and A. Demircan, “Structure and Vibrational Spectra of tert-butyl N-(2-bromocyclohex-2-enyl)-N-(2-furylmethyl)carbamate,” Acta Physico—Chimica Sinica, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 1683–1690, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. H. Arslan, D. S. Mansuroglu, D. VanDerveer, and G. Binzet, “The molecular structure and vibrational spectra of N-(2,2-diphenylacetyl)-N-(naphthalen-1yl)-thiourea by Hartree-Fock and density functional methods,” Spectrochimica Acta—Part A, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 561–571, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. H. Arslan, Performance Analysis of Vibrational Frequencies, PAVF 1.0, Mersin, Turkey, 2007.
  27. H. Arslan, U. Flörke, and N. Külcü, “Theoretical studies of molecular structure and vibrational spectra of O-ethyl benzoylthiocarbamate,” Spectrochimica Acta—Part A, vol. 67, no. 3-4, pp. 936–943, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. H. Arslan, Ö. Algül, and Y. Dündar, “Structural and spectral studies on 3-(6-benzoyl-5-chloro-2-benzoxazolinon-3-yl) propanoic acid,” Vibrational Spectroscopy, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 248–255, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. H. Arslan and Ö. Algül, “Theoretical studies of molecular structure and vibrational spectra of 2-ethyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazole,” Asian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 2229–2235, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  30. T. Kupka, R. Wrzalik, G. Pasterna, and K. Pasterny, “Theoretical DFT and experimental Raman and NMR studies on thiophene, 3-methylthiophene and selenophene,” Journal of Molecular Structure, vol. 616, no. 1–3, pp. 17–32, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. R. Wysokiński, J. Kuduk-Jaworska, and D. Michalska, “Electronic structure, Raman and infrared spectra, and vibrational assignment of carboplatin. Density functional theory studies,” Journal of Molecular Structure, vol. 758, no. 2-3, pp. 169–179, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. T. Kuppens, K. Vandyck, J. van der Eycken, W. Herrebout, B. van der Veken, and P. Bultinck, “A DFT conformational analysis and VCD study on methyl tetrahydrofuran-2-carboxylate,” Spectrochimica Acta—Part A, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 402–411, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. J. Hanuza, W. Sasiadek, J. Michalski et al., “Polarized Raman and infrared spectra of the salol crystal—chemical quantum calculations of the vibrational normal modes,” Vibrational Spectroscopy, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 253–268, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. H. Arslan, A. Demircan, and E. Göktürk, “Vibrational spectroscopy investigation using ab initio and density functional theory analysis on the structure of 5-chloro-10-oxa-3-thia-tricyclo[5.2.1.01,5]dec-8-ene-3,3-dioxide,” Spectrochimica Acta—Part A, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 105–112, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. S. Bayari, S. Saglam, and H. F. Ustundag, “Experimental and theoretical studies of the vibrational spectrum of 5-hydroxytryptamine,” Journal of Molecular Structure, vol. 726, no. 1–3, pp. 225–232, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. M. Silverstein, G. Clayton Basseler, and C. Morill, Identification of Organic Compounds, Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 1981.
  37. H. Arslan and A. Demircan, “Ab initio studies on 5-Bromo-10-oxa-3-thiatricyclo[5.2.1.01,5]-Dec-8-ene3,3-dioxide,” Acta Chimica Slovenica, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 341–353, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  38. B. Smith, Infrared Spectral Interpretaion, a Systematic Approach, CRC Press, Washington, DC, USA, 1999.
  39. R. L. Peesole, L. D. Shield, and I. C. McWillam, Methods of Chemical Analysis, Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 1976.
  40. R. Kimmelma and M. Hotokka, “Structure—stability relationships in unsaturated sulfur compounds VI. An ab initio study of the stable conformations of (E)- and (Z)-2-methylthio-, methylsulfinyl- and methylsulfonyl-2-butenes,” Journal of Molecular Structure, vol. 418, no. 2-3, pp. 189–196, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  41. N. Sundaraganesan, C. Meganathan, B. Anand, and C. Lapouge, “FT-IR, FT-Raman spectra and ab initio DFT vibrational analysis of p-bromophenoxyacetic acid,” Spectrochimica Acta—Part A, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 773–780, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. O. V. Cabral, C. C. Téllez, T. Giannerini, and J. Felcman, “Fourier-transform infrared spectrum of aspartate hydroxo-aqua nickel (II) complex and DFT-B3LYP/3-21G and 6-311G structural and vibrational calculations,” Spectrochimica Acta—Part A, vol. 61, no. 1-2, pp. 337–345, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. J. Mohan, Organic Spectroscopy Principles and Applications, Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi, India, 2001.
  44. S. Gunasekaran, R. Thilak Kumar, and S. Ponnusamy, “Vibrational spectra and normal coordinate analysis of diazepam, phenytoin and phenobarbitone,” Spectrochimica Acta—Part A, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 1041–1052, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. N. Sundaraganesan, S. Ilakiamani, P. Subramani, and B. D. Joshua, “Comparison of experimental and ab initio HF and DFT vibrational spectra of benzimidazole,” Spectrochimica Acta—Part A, vol. 67, no. 3-4, pp. 628–635, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. H. W. Dudley and I. Fleming, Methods in Organic Chemistry, McGraw-Hill, London, UK, 4th ed edition, 1989.
  47. Y. M. Evtushenko, V. M. Ivanov, and B. E. Zaitsev, “Determination of epoxide and hydroxyl groups in epoxide resins by IR spectrometry,” Journal of Analytical Chemistry, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 347–350, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel et al., Gaussian 03, Revision C. 02, Gaussian, Pittsburgh, Pa, USA, 2003.
  49. T. Yesilkaynak, G. Binzet, F. M. Emen, U. Flörke, N. Külcü, and H. Arslan, “Theoretical and experimental studies on N-(6-methylpyridin-2-yl-carbamothioyl)biphenyl-4-carboxamide,” European Journal of Chemistry, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. C. Y. Panicker, H. T. Varghese, K. R. Ambujakshan et al., “Ab initio and density functional theory studies on vibrational spectra of 3-{[(4-methoxyphenyl)methylene]amino}-2-phenylquinazolin-4(3H)-one,” European Journal of Chemistry, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 37–43, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. C. Y. Panicker, H. T. Varghese, A. George, and P. K. V. Thomas, “FT-IR, FT-Raman and ab-initio studies of 1,3-diphenyl thiourea,” European Journal of Chemistry, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 173–178, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. P. M. Anbarasan, P. S. Kumar, K. Vasudevan, R. Govindan, A. Prakasam, and M. Geetha, “Geometrical, electronic structure, nonlinear optical and spectroscopic investigations of 4-(phenylthio)phthalonitrile dye sensitizer for solar cells using quantum chemical calculations,” European Journal of Chemistry, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 206–213, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. V. Arjunan, T. Rani, C. V. Mythili, and S. Mohan, “Synthesis, FT-IR, FT-Raman and quantum chemical investigations of N-(3-methylphenyl)-2,2-dichloroacetamide,” European Journal of Chemistry, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 70–76, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. M. H. Jamróz, Vibrational Energy Distribution Analysis VEDA 4, Warsaw, Poland, 2004.

Copyright © 2013 Hakan Arslan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views3934
Downloads1333
Citations

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.