Efficient Synthesis and Characterization of Some Novel Nitro-Schiff Bases and Their Complexes of Nickel(II) and Copper(II)

Naeimi, Hossein; Moradian, Mohsen

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/701826

Journal of Chemistry

On this page

Abstract Introduction Experimental Results and Discussion Conclusion References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 | Article ID 701826 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/701826

Efficient Synthesis and Characterization of Some Novel Nitro-Schiff Bases and Their Complexes of Nickel(II) and Copper(II)

Hossein Naeimi¹and Mohsen Moradian¹

Academic Editor: Serife Tokalioglu

Received22 Feb 2012

Revised16 May 2012

Accepted21 May 2012

Published08 Jul 2012

Abstract

Synthesis and characterization of some new Schiff base ligands derived from various diamines and nitrosalicylaldehyde and their complexes of Ni(II) and Cu(II) are reported. Several spectral techniques such as UV-Vis, FT-IR, and NMR spectra were used to identify the chemical structures of the reported ligands and their complexes. The ligands are found to be bound to the metal atom through the oxygen atoms of the hydroxyl groups and nitrogen atoms of imine groups, which is also supported by spectroscopic techniques. The results obtained by FT-IR and NMR showed that the Schiff base complexes of transition metal (II) have square-planar geometry.

1. Introduction

Schiff bases have played an important role in the development of coordination chemistry as they readily form stable complexes with most of the transition metals. The chemistry of Schiff base ligands species has been gaining considerable interest primarily because of their fascinating structural diversities [1–7].

2-Hydroxy Schiff base ligands and their complexes derived from the reaction of salicylaldehyde derivatives with diamines have been extensively studied in great details for their various crystallographic, structural, and magnetic features [8–14]. Schiff base ligands are able to coordinate many different metals, and to stabilize them in various oxidation states, enabling the use of Schiff base metal complexes for a large variety of useful catalytic transformations.

Schiff bases and their coordination compounds are well known to be biologically important and of interest for their antibacterial, antitumour, and antitubercular activities [15]. Furthermore, it has been used as analytical reagent [16–18], polymer-coating, ink, pigment [19], fluorescent materials [20] and catalytic reagents [21]. However, changes in the electronic, steric, and geometric properties of the ligand alter the orbitals at the metal center and thus affect its properties. The nitro group is a strong electron withdrawing group and, due to its steric effects, has played an important role in affecting the reactivity and enantioselectivities in synthesis as catalysts [22, 23]. In continuation of our research on the preparation of Schiff base ligands [24–27] and their complexes [28–31], we decided to prepare some new Schiff bases and their complexes, including electron withdrawing substituents.

The present paper describes the synthesis and spectroscopic characterization of several nitro-Schiff base ligands and their complexes with transition metal ions under mild conditions. The corresponding materials were characterized by spectroscopic (IR, UV/Vis, ¹H and ¹³C NMR, mass spectra) and physical (melting point) data.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

Chemicals were purchased from the Fluka and Merck Chemical Companies. Solvents were purified by standard methods and dried before use by conventional methods.

2.2. Apparatus for Analysis and Physical Measurements

Melting points were taken on a Gallenkamp melting point apparatus and are uncorrected. UV-Vis spectra were recorded on Beckman DU-64 spectrophotometers. ¹H NMR spectra were obtained at 400 MHz using a Bruker Avance 400 NMR in CDCl₃ and DMSO-d₆ as the solvents. ¹³C NMR (100 MHz) spectra for compounds were obtained on a 400 MHz Avance Bruker spectrometer. The infrared spectra were determined on a Perkin-Elmer 781 spectrophotometer and an Impact 400 Nicolet Magna series FT-IR spectrophotometer.

2.3. Synthesis of Ligands

In order to prepare of Schiff base ligands (L1–L8), a solution of 5-nitrosalicylaldehyde (4 mmol) in methanol (20 mL) was slowly added over a solution of selected diamine (2 mmol) in the same solvent (20 mL). The mixture was stirred at 30°C; after the reaction is completed, the product precipitated as a yellowish orange solid and the crude solid was filtered off and washed with ethanol twice (2 × 20 mL).

2.3.1. N,N′-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylidene)-1,2-Ethanediamine (L1) (entry 1, Table 1)

5-Nitrosalicylaldehyde: (0.668 g, 4 mmol); ethanediamine: (0.120 g, 2 mmol); yield: 91%; M.p: 272–274°C. Anal. Calcd.: C, 53.63; H, 3.94; N, 15.64. Found: C, 53.21; H, 3.89; N, 15.55. ¹H NMR, δ(ppm): 14.05–14.50 (s, 2H, O–H), 8.91 (s, 2H, CH=N), 8.58 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 8.17 (dd, 2H, Ar–H), 6.91 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 4.1 (s, 4H, CH₂). ¹³C NMR, δ(ppm): 177.45, 168.73, 136.21, 133.49, 130.62, 123.55, 115.91, 52.28.

2.3.2. N,N′-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylidene)-1,3-Propanediamine (L2) (entry 2, Table 1)

5-Nitrosalicylaldehyde: (0.668 g, 4 mmol); 1,3-propanediamine: (0.15 g, 2 mmol); yield: 90%; M.p: 210–213°C. Anal. Calcd.: C, 54.84; H, 4.33; N, 15.05. Found: C, 54.39; H, 4.21; N, 14.88. ¹H NMR, δ(ppm): 14.05–14.50 (s, 2H, O–H), 8.91 (s, 2H, HC=N), 8.58 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 8.17 (dd, 2H, Ar–H), 6.91 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 3.91 (t, 4H, CH₂), 2.38 (q, 2H, CH₂). ¹³C NMR, δ(ppm): 177.45, 168.73, 136.21, 133.49, 130.62, 123.55, 115.91, 52.28, 31.11.

2.3.3. N,N′-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylidene)-1,4-Butanediamine (L3) (entry 3, Table 1)

5-Nitrosalicylaldehyde: (0.668 g, 4 mmol); 1,4-butanediamine: (0.176 g, 2 mmol); yield: 88%; M.p: 173–176°C. Anal. Calcd.: C, 55.96; H, 4.70; N, 14.50. Found: C, 55.84; H, 4.46; N, 14.81. ¹H NMR, δ(ppm): 14.18–14.78(s, 2H, O–H), 8.83 (s, 2H, CH=N), 8.50 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 8.21 (dd, 2H, Ar–H), 6.89 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 3.83 (t, 4H, CH₂), 2.50 (q, 4H, CH₂). ¹³C NMR, δ(ppm): 177.10, 168.76, 136.21, 133.48, 130.61, 123.52, 115.97, 48.23, 28.59.

2.3.4. N,N′-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylidene)-1,7-Heptanediamine (L4)

(entry 4, Table 1), 5-nitrosalicylaldehyde: (0.668 g, 4 mmol); 1,7-heptanediamine: (0.26 g, 2 mmol); Yield: 88%; M.p: 150–152°C. Anal. Calcd.: C, 58.87; H, 5.65; N, 13.08. Found: C, 58.61; H, 5.78; N, 13.12. ¹H NMR, δ(ppm): 14.03–14.37 (s, 2H, O–H), 8.74 (s, 2H, CH=N), 8.68 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 8.27 (dd, 2H, Ar–H), 7.04 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 3.76 (t, 4H, CH₂), 1.94 (m, 4H, CH₂), 1.68 (m, 4H, CH₂). ¹³C NMR, δ(ppm): 180.25, 169.14, 136.24, 133.41, 130.62, 123.57, 115.94, 53.10, 26.57, 25.28.

2.3.5. N,N′-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylidene)-1,8-Octanediamine (L5) (entry 5, Table 1)

5-Nitrosalicylaldehyde: (0.668 g, 4 mmol); 1,8-octanediamine: (0.30 g, 2 mmol); yield: 85%; M.p: 161–164°C. Anal. Calcd.: C, 59.72; H, 5.92; N, 12.66. Found: C, 59.34; H, 5.66; N, 12.88. ¹H NMR, δ(ppm): 14.15–14.60 (s, 2H, O–H), 8.81 (s, 2H, CH=N), 8.68 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 8.27 (dd, 2H, Ar–H), 6.48 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 3.4 (t, 4H, CH₂), 1.45 (m, 4H, CH₂), 1.21 (m, 8H, CH₂). ¹³C NMR, δ(ppm): 176.24, 168.54, 135.23, 133.71, 130.7, 124.22, 115.41, 53.85, 30.73, 29.95, 27.52.

2.3.6. N,N′-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylidene)-1,2-Phenylenediamine (L6) (entry 6, Table 1)

5-Nitrosalicylaldehyde: (0.668 g, 4 mmol); 1,2-phenylenediamine: (0.22 g, 2 mmol); yield: 92%; M.p: 261–264°C. Anal. Calcd.: C, 59.12; H, 3.47; N, 13.79. Found: C, 58.94; H, 3.51; N, 13.66. ¹H NMR, δ(ppm): 14.02–14.60 (s, 2H, O–H), 8.81 (s, 2H, CH=N), 8.48 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 7.94 (dd, 2H, Ar–H), 7.35 (s, 2H, Ar–H), 6.8 (d, 2H, Ar–H). ¹³C NMR, δ(ppm): 175.4, 166.7, 139.1, 135.2, 133.2, 131.6, 128.2, 123.1, 120.8, 115.6.

2.3.7. N,N′-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylidene)-4,4′-Diaminodiphenylmethane (L7) (entry 7, Table 1)

5-Nitrosalicylaldehyde: (0.668 g, 4 mmol); 4,4′-diaminodiphenyl-methane: (0.40 g, 2 mmol); yield: 92%; M.p: 193–195°C. Anal. Calcd.: C, 65.32; H, 4.06; N, 11.28. Found: C, 65.23; H, 3.88; N, 11.65. ¹H NMR, δ(ppm): 13.55–14.08 (br, 2H, O–H), 8.87 (s, 2H, CH=N), 8.66 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 8.13 (dd, 2H, Ar–H), 6.63–7.48 (m, 10H, Ar–H), 2.65 (s, 2H, CH₂); mass (EI): 498, 349, 195, 167, 108, 65, 39, 30.

2.3.8. N,N′-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylidene)-4,4′-Diaminodiphenylether (L8) (entry 8, Table 1)

5-Nitrosalicylaldehyde: (0.668 g, 4 mmol); 4,4′-diaminodiphenyl-ether: (0.40 g, 2 mmol); yield: 94%; M.p: 204–206°C. Anal. Calcd.: C, 62.65; H, 3.64; N, 11.24. Found: C, 62.54; H, 3.87; N, 11.58. ¹H NMR, δ(ppm): 14.15–14.58 (br, 2H, O–H), 8.70 (s, 2H, CH=N), 8.58 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 8.21 (dd, 2H, Ar–H), 6.57–7.31 (m, 10H, Ar–H); mass (EI): 498, 349, 195, 167, 108, 65, 39, 30.

2.4. Synthesis of Schiff Base Complexes of Ni(II) and Cu(II)

Metal(II) acetate (1 mmol) were dissolved in 20 mL methanol as stirred for 20 minutes. Also, one mmol of selected Schiff base ligand is added to 20 mL of methanol in a 100 mL two-necked, round-bottomed flask that was provided with a reflux condenser and stirred to dissolve. The metal(II) salt solution was slowly added dropwise to the ligand solution with stirring, the resulting slurry was stirred under N₂ at room temperature. After the end of the reaction time, the mixture is cooled until −5°C over night, the microcrystalline solid was precipitated. The solution was filtered to eliminate excess unreacted metal acetate and the crude solids washed with ethanol (3 × 10 mL).

2.4.1. N,N′-1,2-Ethane-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylaldiminato)Nickel(II) L1[Ni(II)]

yield: 89%; M.p: >350°C. Anal. Calcd.: C, 46.31; H, 2.91; N, 13.50. Found: C, 45.01; H, 3.05; N, 13.28. ¹H NMR δ(ppm): 9.01 (s, 2H, CH=N), 8.80 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 8.34 (dd, 2H, Ar–H), 6.77 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 3.6 (s, 4H, CH₂). ¹³C NMR δ(ppm): 170.47, 160.58, 140.22, 134.32, 129.38, 125.90, 114.64, 51.14.

2.4.2. N,N′-1,3-Propane-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylaldiminato)Nickel(II) L2[Ni(II)]

Yield: 83%; M.p: >350°C. Anal. Calcd.: C, 47.59; H, 3.29; N, 13.06. Found: C, 47.05; H, 3.36; N, 12.66. ¹H NMR δ(ppm): 9.01 (s, 2H, CH=N), 8.80 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 8.34 (dd, 2H, Ar–H), 6.77 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 3.6 (t, 4H, CH₂), 2.3 (q, 2H, CH₂). ¹³C NMR δ(ppm): 170.47, 160.58, 140.22, 134.32, 129.38, 125.90, 114.64, 51.14, 31.25.

2.4.3. N,N′-1,4-Butane-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylaldiminato)Nickel(II) L3[Ni(II)]

Yield: 90%; M.p: >350°C. Anal. Calcd.: C, 48.80; H, 3.64; N, 12.65. Found: C, 48.30; H, 3.52; N, 12.31. ¹H NMR, δ(ppm): 8.83 (s, 2H, CH=N), 8.50 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 8.21 (dd, 2H, Ar–H), 6.89 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 3.83 (t, 4H, CH₂), 2.50 (q, 4H, CH₂); ¹³C NMR, δ(ppm): 177.10, 168.76, 136.21, 133.48, 130.61, 123.52, 115.97, 48.23, 28.59.

2.4.4. N,N′-1,7-Heptane-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylaldiminato)Nickel(II) L4[Ni(II)]

Yield: 87%; M.p: 307°C. Anal. Calcd.: C, 51.99; H, 4.57; N, 11.55. Found: C, 52.11; H, 4.21; N, 11.81. ¹H-NMR, δ(ppm): 8.83 (s, 2H, CH=N), 8.48 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 8.19 (dd, 2H, Ar–H), 6.40 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 3.40 (t, 4H, CH₂), 1.89 (m, 4H, CH₂), 1.17 (m, 6H, CH₂); ¹³C NMR, δ(ppm): 179.09, 168.41, 135.32, 133.83, 130.74, 124.15, 115.26, 53.77, 30.68, 29.59, 27.33. Mass (EI): 428, 411, 393, 310, 263, 179, 163, 133, 104, 78, 55, 30.

2.4.5. N,N′-1,8-Octane-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylaldiminato)Nickel(II) L5[Ni(II)]

Yield: 88%; M.p: 312°C. Anal. Calcd.: C, 52.94; H, 4.85; N, 11.22. Found: C, 53.10; H, 4.62; N, 11.64. ¹H NMR, δ(ppm): 8.81 (s, 2H, CH=N), 8.68 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 8.27 (dd, 2H, Ar–H), 6.48 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 3.4 (t, 4H, CH₂), 1.45 (m, 4H, CH₂), 1.21 (m, 8H, CH₂); ¹³C NMR, δ(ppm): 176.24, 168.54, 135.23, 133.71, 130.7, 124.22, 115.41, 53.85, 30.73, 29.95, 27.52.

2.4.6. N,N′-1,2-Phenylene-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylaldiminato)Nickel(II) L6[Ni(II)]

Yield: 87%; M.p: >350°C. Anal. Calcd.: C, 51.88; H, 2.61; N, 12.10. Found: C, 51.41; H, 2.32; N, 12.35. ¹H NMR δ(ppm): 8.75 (s, 2H, CH=N), 8.32 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 7.78 (dd, 2H, Ar–H), 7.21 (s, 2H, Ar–H), 6.51 (d, 2H, Ar–H). ¹³C NMR δ(ppm): 168.4, 162.7, 134.1, 133.2, 129.2, 129.6, 127.2, 120.1, 118.8, 113.6.

2.4.7. N,N′-4,4′-Diphenylemethane-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylaldiminato)Nickel(II) L7[Ni(II)]

Yield: 85%; M.p: >350°C. Anal. Calcd.: C, 58.63; H, 3.28; N, 10.13. Found: C, 58.25; H, 3.11; N, 10.36. ¹H NMR δ(ppm): 8.9 (s, 2H, CH=N), 8.7 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 8.0 (dd, 2H, Ar–H), 6.3–7.1 (m, 10H, Ar–H), 2.5 (s, 2H, CH₂); Mass (EI): 496, 349, 195, 167, 108, 65, 39, 30.

2.4.8. N,N′-4,4′-Diphenylether-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylaldiminato)Nickel(II) L8[Ni(II)]

Yield: 83%; M.p: 337°C. Anal. Calcd.: C, 56.25; H, 2.90; N, 10.09. Found: C, 56.03; H, 2.65; N, 10.25. ¹H NMR δ(ppm): 8.71 (s, 2H, CH=N), 8.60 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 8.10 (dd, 2H, Ar–H), 6.60–7.50 (m, 10H, Ar–H).

2.4.9. N,N′-1,2-Ethane-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylaldiminato)Copper(II) L1[Cu(II)]

Yield: 88%; M.p: 335°C. Anal. Calcd.: C, 45.77; H, 2.88; N, 13.35. Found: C, 45.89; H, 2.36; N, 13.41. ¹H NMR, δ(ppm): 8.91 (s, 2H, CH=N), 8.58 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 8.17 (dd, 2H, Ar–H), 6.91 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 4.1 (s, 4H, CH₂).

2.4.10. N,N′-1,3-Propane-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylaldiminato)Copper(II) L2[Cu(II)]

Yield: 88%; M.p: >350°C. Anal. Calcd. C, 47.06; H, 3.25; N, 12.91. Found: C, 47.12; H, 3.41; N, 12.62. ¹H NMR δ(ppm): 8.85 (s, 2H, HC=N), 8.38 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 8.27 (dd, 2H, Ar–H), 6.41 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 3.41 (t, 4H, CH₂), 2.20 (q, 2H, CH₂).

2.4.11. N,N′-1,4-Butane-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylaldiminato)Copper(II) L3[Cu(II)]

Yield: 90%; M.p: 255°C. Anal. Calcd.: C, 48.27; H, 3.60; N, 12.51. Found: C, 48.10; H, 3.22; N, 12.11. ¹H NMR, δ(ppm): 8.68 (s, 2H, CH=N), 8.35 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 8.01 (dd, 2H, Ar–H), 6.65 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 3.36 (t, 4H, CH₂), 2.32 (q, 4H, CH₂).

2.4.12. N,N′-1,7-Heptane-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylaldiminato)Copper(II) L4[Cu(II)]

Yield: 89%; M.p: 320°C. Anal. Calcd.: C, 51.48; H, 4.53; N, 11.43. Found: C, 51.32; H, 4.56; N, 11.34. ¹H NMR, δ(ppm): 8.83 (s, 2H, CH=N), 8.48 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 8.19 (dd, 2H, Ar–H), 6.40 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 3.40 (t, 4H, CH₂), 1.89 (m, 4H, CH₂), 1.17 (m, 6H, CH₂).

2.4.13. N,N′-1,8-Octane-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylaldiminato)Copper(II) L5[Cu(II)]

Yield: 82%; M.p: 283°C. Anal. Calcd.: C, 52.43; H, 4.80; N, 11.12. Found: C, 53.69; H, 4.02; N, 11.87. ¹H NMR, δ(ppm): 8.7 (s, 2H, CH=N), 8.5 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 8.1 (dd, 2H, Ar–H), 6.3 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 3.1 (t, 4H, CH₂), 1.2 (m, 4H, CH₂), 1.0 (m, 8H, CH₂).

2.4.14. N,N′-1,2-Phenylene-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylaldiminato)Copper(II) L6[Cu(II)]

Yield: 90%; M.p: >350°C. Anal. Calcd.: C, 51.34; H, 2.59; N, 11.97. Found: C, 51.85; H, 2.33; N, 11.62. ¹H NMR, δ(ppm): 8.81 (s, 2H, CH=N), 8.48 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 7.94 (dd, 2H, Ar–H), 7.35 (s, 2H, Ar–H), 6.8 (d, 2H, Ar–H).

2.4.15. N,N′-4,4′-Diphenylmethan-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylaldiminato)Copper(II) L7[Cu(II)]

Yield: 85%; M.p: 302°C. Anal. Calcd.: C, 58.12; H, 3.25; N, 10.04. Found: C, 57.88; H, 3.46; N, 9.81. ¹H NMR, δ(ppm): 8.74 (s, 2H, CH=N), 8.78 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 8.27 (dd, 2H, Ar–H), 6.81 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 6.41(m, 10H, phenyl ring), 3.74 (s, 2H, CH₂).

2.4.16. N,N′-4,4′-Diphenylether-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylaldiminato)Copper(II) L8[Cu(II)]

Yield: 88%; M.p: >350°C. Anal. Calcd.: C, 55.77; H, 2.88; N, 10.01. Found: C, 55.12; H, 2.65; N, 10.18. ¹H NMR, δ(ppm): 8.87 (s, 2H, CH=N), 8.66 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 8.13 (dd, 2H, Ar–H), 6.63–7.48 (m, 10H, Ar–H).

3. Results and Discussion

In this research, firstly, 2 moles of 5-nitro-salicylaldehyde and 1 mole diamine were reacted together and the corresponding products L1–L8 were obtained under mild and easy conditions (Scheme 1).

The confirmation of these products was demonstrated by spectroscopic and physical data. The results of these reactions were shown in Table 1. As indicated in this table, a lot of useful and convenient Schiff bases were afforded in high yields and appropriate reaction times.

In continuation of this research, in order to prepare all complexes, we applied Schiff base ligands in the reaction with equal moles amounts of nickel(II) and copper(II) acetate salts in methanol solution (Scheme 2).

The corresponding results of these reactions were summarized in Table 2. Because of high reactivity regarding ligands in complex formation, the reactions have been proceeded under mild conditions at room temperature. This factor was restrained from oxidation of metal(II) to metal(III) in products.

The para-nitro-substitution of phenyl ring causes that the phenolic OH becomes more acidic; this affected on the conditions of direction synthesis of ligands and complexes. Basically, the aldehyde group becomes more active and increases the yield of the Schiff base formation. In addition to the formation of complexes, the phenolic hydrogen releases easier and thus the complex formation occurs in low reaction time at room temperature.

3.1. Electronic Spectra

The electronic spectra of the ligands and their metal complexes were recorded in 1,2-dichloroethane. The electronic spectral data of the H2L ligands and their metal complexes are summarized in Table 3. The H2L shows two bands at 380–410 nm (ε = 8.9 × 10³ mol⁻¹ cm⁻¹) and 275–315 nm ( mol⁻¹cm⁻¹), which may be assigned to the and transitions, respectively; the complexes show two bands in the 295–335 and 335–360 nm ranges which are assigned to intraligand transition [32–34]. In the complexes, the transitions due to the azomethine group are shifted to the lower energy. From these results, the nitrogen atom of the imines group appears to be coordinated to the metal ion [35]. The remainder of the observed bands at about 290–320 nm are assigned as π* type transitions involving molecular orbital located on the phenolic chromophore. The nickel(II) complexes show two bands at 430 and 581 nm and 430 and 570 nm are due to ³T₁→³T₂ transitions, indicating square planar environment around the nickel(II) ion [36–38]. For the nitro-substituted ligands, a considerable overlap between and is observed. The transition has been assumed to be localized mainly on the azomethine chromophore [39]. Instead, the band has been assigned to a transition involving mainly π molecular orbitals of the aromatic ring of the salicylidenenimine moiety [40]. In the ligands, these bonds were observed at about 280–320 nm. This blue shift in the complexes may be due to the electron’s donation of a lone pair by the oxygen of the phenoxy group to the central metal atom.

3.2. IR Spectra

Important spectral bands of the H2L and its metal complexes are presented in Table 3. Significant frequencies were selected by comparing the IR spectra of the ligands with those of the metal complexes. The IR spectrum of the H2L shows broad medium bands in the 3450–3200 and 3100–2600 cm⁻¹ ranges, which attributed to intramolecular hydrogen bonding [41]. The spectra are showed broad strong bands at 3396 and 3250 and strong bands at 1662 and 1600 cm⁻¹ are assigned to the ν(NH), ν(C–O), and ν(C=N), respectively [42, 43]. Also, the strong and medium bands appear at 1570, 1508, and 1326 cm⁻¹, correspond to ν(C–C)Ar., ν(CH–C)AL, andν(C–O), respectively [44].

The ligands and complexes were characterized mainly using the imine and phenolic bands. The main infrared bands and their assignments are listed in Table 3. The IR spectra of the complexes in comparison with the free ligands to determine the changes that might have taken place during the complexation. The band at 1610–1640 cm⁻¹ is characteristic of the azomethine nitrogen atom in the free ligand. The observed lowering in this frequency to region 1590–1615 cm⁻¹ in all the complexes and indicates the involvement of the azomethine nitrogen atom in coordination with metalation [45, 46]. The spectra of the ligands shows broad bands in the rang 3200–3500 cm⁻¹ assignable to intramolecular H-bonded of phenolic groups [47], which are absent in the spectra of their complexes, indicating that the oxygen of the –OH groups is coordinated to the metal ion [48]. Thus, the entire ligands act as tetradentate chelating compound coordinated to metal ion through two oxygen and two nitrogen atoms [49]. These data are well in accordance with those of reported complexes [50, 51].

Upon coordination bands at 1512 and 1341 cm⁻¹ which are typical of nitro group, nitro ligands undergo minor changes in complexes. It may therefore be that the nitro group is not coordinated to the metal ions. In all the complexes, the bands at 617–461 cm⁻¹ and 461–420 cm⁻¹ rang can be attributed to the and modes, respectively.

3.3. Magnetic Properties of Complexes

Molecular paramagnetism is a characteristic property of unpaired electron systems. In most coordination compounds of the transition metals and some organometallic compounds as well, paramagnetic behavior is encountered due to the incompletely filled 3d, 4d, and 5d electron shell. It should be noted that simple paramagnetism will be found only if there is sufficient magnetic dilution. This is the case if, due to the presence of large organic ligands, the paramagnetic centers are well separated, thus avoiding cooperative interactions of the ferro and antiferromagnetic type. Magnetic susceptibility amounts of the complexes were summarized in Table 4.

3.4. ¹H NMR and ¹³C NMR Spectra

Spectra of all the complexes were recorded in DMSO-d₆ solution at 400 MHz and chemical shifts are in units of ppm relative to TMS as internal standard on the delta (δ) scale. The general ¹H NMR spectrum of the Schiff bases in DMSO shows the following signals: 14.0–14.5 δ a singlet and broad band for phenolic (O–H) group, 8.9 δ a singlet band for azomethine hydrogen (HC=N), 8.5-8.6 δ a doublet band for Ar–H, 8.1-8.2 δ as dd for Ar–H and 6.9–7.1 ppm a doublet peak for Ar–H. The absence of peak in 14.0 ppm, noted in the metal(II) complex, indicates the loss of the –OH proton due to complexation [52].

Intermolecular hydrogen bonding also accounts for the high frequency of the signals for the orthophenolic hydrogens in all the Schiff bases. By comparing the ¹H NMR spectra of all the Schiff bases with those of their corresponding metal(II) complexes, it is noted that there is a downfield shift in the frequency of azomethine protons of the aromatic bridge and up to field shift in the aliphatic bridge confirming coordination of the metal ion to both groups.

4. Conclusion

In this study, we have reported a mild and convenient method for synthesis of some Schiff base complexes of metal() at room temperature. Also the desired Schiff bases for preparation of these complexes have been obtained through easy, simple, and efficient reaction of nitrosalicylaldehyde with various diamines. The resulting products have been afforded in excellent yields and efficient reaction times. The ligands are found to be bound to the metal atom through the oxygen atoms of the hydroxyl groups and nitrogen atoms of imine chromophore which is also supported by spectroscopic techniques.

Acknowledgment

The authors gratefully acknowledge partial support of this work by the Research Affairs Office of the University of Kashan, Iran.

References

H. Schiff, “Mittheilungen aus dem Universitätslaboratorium in Pisa: eine neue Reihe organischer Basen,” Justus Liebigs Annalen Der Chemie, vol. 131, pp. 118–119, 1864.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Asadi, H. Sepehrpour, and K. H. Mohammadi, “Tetradentate schiff base ligands of 3,4- diaminobenzophenone: synthesis, characterization and thermodynamics of complex formation with Ni(II), Cu(II) and Zn(II) metal ions,” Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society, vol. 76, pp. 63–74, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Brooker, “Some copper and cobalt complexes of schiff-base macrocycles containing pyridazine head units,” European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, no. 10, pp. 2535–2547, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
A. E. Martell, J. Perutka, and D. Kong, “Dinuclear metal complexes and ligands: Stabilities and catalytic effects,” Coordination Chemistry Reviews, vol. 216-217, pp. 55–63, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. H. Monfared, M. Vahedpour, M. M. Yeganeh, M. Ghorbanloo, P. Mayer, and C. Janiak, “Concentration dependent tautomerism in green [Cu(HL1)(L 2)] and brown [Cu(L1)(HL2)] with H 2L1 = (E)-N′-(2-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzylidene) benzoylhydrazone and HL2 = pyridine-4-carboxylic (isonicotinic) acid,” Dalton Transactions, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1286–1294, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A.-C. Chamayou, S. Lüdeke, V. Brecht, T. B. Freedman, L. A. Nafie, and C. Janiak, “Chirality and diastereoselection of $Δ / \nabla$ -configured tetrahedral zinc complexes through enantiopure Schiff base complexes: Combined vibrational circular dichroism, density functional theory, ¹H NMR, and X-ray structural studies,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 50, no. 22, pp. 11363–11374, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Janiak, A. C. Chamayou, A. K. M. Royhan Uddin, M. Uddin, K. S. Hagen, and M. Enamullah, “Polymorphs, enantiomorphs, chirality and helicity in [Rh{N,O} (η4-cod)] complexes with {N,O} = salicylaldiminato Schiff base or aminocarboxylato ligands,” Dalton Transactions, no. 19, pp. 3698–3709, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. H. Monfared, Z. Kalantari, M. A. Kamyabi, and C. Janiak, “Synthesis, structural characterization and electrochemical studies of a nicotinamide-bridged dinuclear copper complex derived from a tridentate hydrazone schiff base ligand,” Zeitschrift fur Anorganische und Allgemeine Chemie, vol. 633, no. 11-12, pp. 1945–1948, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. S. Ramasubramanian, B. R. Bhat, R. Dileep, and S. J. Rani, “Transition metal complexes of 5-bromosalicylidene-4-amino-3-mercapto-1,2,4-triazine-5-one: Synthesis, characterization, catalytic and antibacterial studies,” Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society, vol. 76, pp. 75–83, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Ziessel, “Schiff-based bipyridine ligands. Unusual coordination features and mesomorphic behaviour,” Coordination Chemistry Reviews, vol. 216-217, pp. 195–223, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Sunatsuki, Y. Motoda, and N. Matsumoto, “Copper(II) complexes with multidentate Schiff-base ligands containing imidazole groups: ligand-complex or self-complementary molecule?” Coordination Chemistry Reviews, vol. 226, no. 1-2, pp. 199–209, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Naeimi and M. Moradian, “Synthesis and characterization of nitro-Schiff bases derived from 5-nitro-salicylaldehyde and various diamines and their complexes of Co(II),” Journal of Coordination Chemistry, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 156–162, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Nair, L. H. Nair, and D. Thankamani, “Synthesis and characterization of oxomolybdenum(V) and dioxomolybdenum(VI) complexes derived from N'-(2-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzylidene)isonicotinohydrazide,” Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 221–233, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Naeimi, F. Salimi, and K. Rabiei, “Convenient, mild and rapid synthesis and characterization of some Schiff-base ligands and their complexes with uranyl(II) ion,” Journal of Coordination Chemistry, vol. 61, no. 22, pp. 3659–3665, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. P. Mishra, R. K. Mishra, and S. P. Shrivastava, “Structural and antimicrobial studies of coordination compounds of VO(II), Co(II), Ni(II) and Cu(II) with some Schiff bases involving 2-amino-4-chlorophenol,” Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society, vol. 74, pp. 523–535, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Shamsipur, A. R. Ghiasvand, H. Sharghi, and H. Naeimi, “Solid phase extraction of ultra trace copper(II) using octadecyl silica membrane disks modified by a naphthol-derivative Schiff's base,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 408, no. 1-2, pp. 271–277, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Bühlmann, E. Pretsch, and E. Bakker, “Carrier-based ion-selective electrodes and bulk optodes. 2. Ionophores for potentiometric and optical sensors,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 1593–1687, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Sharghi and H. Naeimi, “Schiff-base complexes of metal(II) as new catalysts in the high- regioselective conversion of epoxides to halo alcohols by means of elemental halogen,” Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, vol. 72, no. 7, pp. 1525–1531, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. K. Whitesell, “C2 symmetry and asymmetric induction,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 89, no. 7, pp. 1581–1590, 1989.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Tsai, P. A. Szweda, O. Vinogradova, and L. I. Szweda, “Structural characterization and immunochemical detection of a fluorophore derived from 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal and lysine,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 14, pp. 7975–7980, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Ojima, Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 1994.
M. Qiu, G. S. Liu, X. Q. Yao, M. Y. Guo, G. Z. Pan, and Z. Zheng, “Chiral copper(II)-Schiff base complexes as catalysts for asymmetric cyclopropanation of styrene,” Chinese Journal of Catalysis, vol. 22, p. 77, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
E. N. Jacobsen, W. Zhang, and M. L. Güler, “Electronic tuning of asymmetric catalysts,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 113, no. 17, pp. 6703–6704, 1991.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Naeimi, H. Sharghi, F. Salimi, and K. Rabiei, “Facile and efficient method for preparation of Schiff bases catalyzed by P₂O₅/SiO₂ under free Solvent conditions,” Heteroatom Chemistry, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 43–47, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Naeimi and K. Rabiei, “Convenient, mild and one-pot synthesis of double Schiff bases from three component reaction of salicylaldehyde, ammonium acetate and aliphatic aldehydes accelerated by NEt₃ as a base,” Journal of the Chinese Chemical Society, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 1293–1298, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Naeimi, J. Safari, and A. Heidarnezhad, “Synthesis of Schiff base ligands derived from condensation of salicylaldehyde derivatives and synthetic diamine,” Dyes and Pigments, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 251–253, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Naeimi, K. Rabiei, and F. Salimi, “Efficient, mild and one pot synthesis of N,N'-bis(salicylidene)arylmethanediamines via three component reaction under solvent free conditions,” Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 2445–2448, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Naeimi and M. Moradian, “Alumina-supported metal(II) Schiff base complexes as heterogeneous catalysts in the high-regioselective cleavage of epoxides to halohydrins by using elemental halogen,” Polyhedron, vol. 27, no. 18, pp. 3639–3645, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Naeimi and M. N. Barzoky, “Efficient, convenient and mild three-component template preparation and characterization of some new Schiff base complexes,” Journal of the Chinese Chemical Society, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 858–862, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Naeimi and M. Moradian, “Metal(II) Schiff base complexes as catalysts for the high-regioselective conversion of epoxides to β-hydroxy nitriles in glycol solvents,” Canadian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 84, no. 11, pp. 1575–1579, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Mazloum Ardakani, M. Jamshidpoor, H. Naeimi, and A. Heidarnezhad, “Determination of salicylate by selective poly(vinylchloride) membrane electrode based on N,N′-1,4-butylene bis(3-methyl salicylidene iminato) copper(II),” Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1127–1132, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
A. S. El-Tabl, F. A. El-Saied, and A. N. Al-Hakimi, “Synthesis, spectroscopic investigation and biological activity of metal complexes with ONO trifunctionalalized hydrazone ligand,” Transition Metal Chemistry, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 689–701, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Prabhakar, K. L. Reddy, and P. Lingaiah, “Synthesis, thermal, spectral and magnetic studies of complexes of Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II), Ru(II), Pd(II) and Pt(II) with 2,3-disubstituted quinazoline-(3H)-4-ones,” Journal of Chemical Sciences, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 121–132, 1989.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Karaböcek and N. Karaböcek, “Mono- and dinuclear copper(II) complexes of a Schiff base ligand, 4′,5′-bis(salicylideneimino)benzo-15-crown-5,” Polyhedron, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 1771–1774, 1997.
View at: Google Scholar
M. J. M. Campbell, “Transition metal complexes of thiosemicarbazide and thiosemicarbazones,” Coordination Chemistry Reviews, vol. 15, no. 2-3, pp. 279–319, 1975.
View at: Google Scholar
A. S. El-Tabl and S. A. El-Enein, “Reactivity of the new potentially binucleating ligand, 2-(acetichydrazido-N-methylidene-α-naphthol)-benzothiazol, towards manganese(II), nickel(II), cobalt(II), copper(II) and zinc(II) salts,” Journal of Coordination Chemistry, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 281–294, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. C. Chiumia, D. J. Phillips, and A. David Rae, “N-Oxide-bridged complexes of cobalt(II) and nickel(II) with 2-acetylpyridine 1-oxide oxime (pro). X-ray crystal structure of the dimeric complex [Co(pxo)(CH₃OH)Cl₂]₂,” Inorganica Chimica Acta, vol. 238, no. 1-2, pp. 197–201, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Tanaka, “Some addition compounds of bis-salicylaldehyde-ethylenediimine-copper. Part II,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 80, no. 15, pp. 4108–4110, 1958.
View at: Google Scholar
M. D. Hobday and T. D. Smith, “N,N'-ethylenebis(salicylideneiminato) transition metal ion chelates,” Coordination Chemistry Reviews, vol. 9, no. 3-4, pp. 311–337, 1973.
View at: Google Scholar
H. E. Smith, J. R. Neergaard, E. P. Burrows, and F. M. Chen, “Optically active amines. XVI. The exciton chirality method applied to the salicylidenimino chromophore. The salicylidenimino chirality rule,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 96, no. 9, pp. 2908–2916, 1974.
View at: Google Scholar
A. S. El-Tabl, “Novel N,N-diacetyloximo-1,3-phenylenediamine copper(II) complexes,” Transition Metal Chemistry, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 400–405, 1997.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Z. El-Sonbati, “Polymer complexes, XVII. Thermal stability of poly(5-vinyl salicylidene)-2-aminophenol homopolymer and polymer complexes of 5-vinyl salicylidene-2-aminophenol with transition metal acetates,” Transition Metal Chemistry, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 45–47, 1991.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Singh, R. V. Singh, and J. P. Tandon, “Synthesis and structural features of organo Si(IV) imine complexes,” Polyhedron, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 151–154, 1988.
View at: Google Scholar
A. S. El-Tabl, K. Y. El-Baradie, and R. M. Issa, “Novel platinum(II) and (IV) complexes of naphthaldimine schiff bases,” Journal of Coordination Chemistry, vol. 56, no. 13, pp. 1113–1122, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Faniran, K. S. Patel, and J. C. Bailar Jr., “Infrared spectra of N,N′-bis(salicylidene)-1,1-(dimethyl)ethylenediamine and its metal complexes,” Journal of Inorganic and Nuclear Chemistry, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 1547–1551, 1974.
View at: Google Scholar
H. H. Freedman, “Intramolecular H-bonds. I. A spectroscopic study of the hydrogen bond between hydroxyl and nitrogen,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 83, no. 13, pp. 2900–2905, 1961.
View at: Google Scholar
W. Xie, M. J. Heeg, and P. G. Wang, “Formation and crystal structure of a polymeric La(H₂salen) complex,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 2541–2543, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
O. Pouralimardan, A. C. Chamayou, C. Janiak, and H. Hosseini-Monfared, “Hydrazone Schiff base-manganese(II) complexes: synthesis, crystal structure and catalytic reactivity,” Inorganica Chimica Acta, vol. 360, no. 5, pp. 1599–1608, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Seminara, S. Giuffrida, A. Musumeci, and I. Fragalá, “Polynuclear complexes of lanthanides with nickel and copper schiff bases as ligands,” Inorganica Chimica Acta, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 201–205, 1984.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Dianzhong and W. Bo, “Complexes of cobalt(II), nickel(II), copper(II), zinc(II) and manganese(II) with tridentate Schiff base ligand,” Transition Metal Chemistry, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 101–103, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. S. Downing and F. L. Urbach, “The circular dichroism of square-planar, tetradentate Schiff base chelates of copper(II),” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 91, no. 22, pp. 5977–5983, 1969.
View at: Google Scholar
D. N. Kumar and B. S. Garg, “Synthesis and spectroscopic studies of complexes of zinc(II) with N₂O₂ donor groups,” Spectrochimica Acta, Part A, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 141–147, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2013 Hossein Naeimi and Mohsen Moradian. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

5810

Downloads

3155

Citations

Journal of Chemistry

Efficient Synthesis and Characterization of Some Novel Nitro-Schiff Bases and Their Complexes of Nickel(II) and Copper(II)

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

2.2. Apparatus for Analysis and Physical Measurements

2.3. Synthesis of Ligands

2.3.1. N,N′-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylidene)-1,2-Ethanediamine (L1) (entry 1, Table 1)

2.3.2. N,N′-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylidene)-1,3-Propanediamine (L2) (entry 2, Table 1)

2.3.3. N,N′-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylidene)-1,4-Butanediamine (L3) (entry 3, Table 1)

2.3.4. N,N′-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylidene)-1,7-Heptanediamine (L4)

2.3.5. N,N′-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylidene)-1,8-Octanediamine (L5) (entry 5, Table 1)

2.3.6. N,N′-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylidene)-1,2-Phenylenediamine (L6) (entry 6, Table 1)

2.3.7. N,N′-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylidene)-4,4′-Diaminodiphenylmethane (L7) (entry 7, Table 1)

2.3.8. N,N′-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylidene)-4,4′-Diaminodiphenylether (L8) (entry 8, Table 1)

2.4. Synthesis of Schiff Base Complexes of Ni(II) and Cu(II)

2.4.1. N,N′-1,2-Ethane-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylaldiminato)Nickel(II) L1[Ni(II)]

2.4.2. N,N′-1,3-Propane-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylaldiminato)Nickel(II) L2[Ni(II)]

2.4.3. N,N′-1,4-Butane-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylaldiminato)Nickel(II) L3[Ni(II)]

2.4.4. N,N′-1,7-Heptane-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylaldiminato)Nickel(II) L4[Ni(II)]

2.4.5. N,N′-1,8-Octane-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylaldiminato)Nickel(II) L5[Ni(II)]

2.4.6. N,N′-1,2-Phenylene-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylaldiminato)Nickel(II) L6[Ni(II)]

2.4.7. N,N′-4,4′-Diphenylemethane-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylaldiminato)Nickel(II) L7[Ni(II)]

2.4.8. N,N′-4,4′-Diphenylether-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylaldiminato)Nickel(II) L8[Ni(II)]

2.4.9. N,N′-1,2-Ethane-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylaldiminato)Copper(II) L1[Cu(II)]

2.4.10. N,N′-1,3-Propane-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylaldiminato)Copper(II) L2[Cu(II)]

2.4.11. N,N′-1,4-Butane-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylaldiminato)Copper(II) L3[Cu(II)]

2.4.12. N,N′-1,7-Heptane-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylaldiminato)Copper(II) L4[Cu(II)]

2.4.13. N,N′-1,8-Octane-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylaldiminato)Copper(II) L5[Cu(II)]

2.4.14. N,N′-1,2-Phenylene-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylaldiminato)Copper(II) L6[Cu(II)]

2.4.15. N,N′-4,4′-Diphenylmethan-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylaldiminato)Copper(II) L7[Cu(II)]

2.4.16. N,N′-4,4′-Diphenylether-Bis(5-Nitrosalicylaldiminato)Copper(II) L8[Cu(II)]

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Electronic Spectra

3.2. IR Spectra

3.3. Magnetic Properties of Complexes

3.4. 1H NMR and 13C NMR Spectra

4. Conclusion

Acknowledgment

References

Copyright

3.4. ¹H NMR and ¹³C NMR Spectra