Journal of Chemistry

Journal of Chemistry / 2015 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 403597 | 9 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/403597

Use of Zeolite ZSM-5 for Loading and Release of 5-Fluorouracil

Academic Editor: Jose L. Arias
Received03 Jun 2015
Accepted21 Jul 2015
Published17 Sep 2015

Abstract

Samples of zeolite ZSM-5 have been synthesized in both the sodium form (ZSM-5) and the acid activated form (H-ZSM-5). In addition, each of these two forms was prepared in the two molar SiO2/Al2O3 ratios of 169 and 15. All samples of these ZSM-5 derivatives were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms, thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA), X-ray fluorescence (XRF), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The samples were successfully loaded with the anticancer drug 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with loading capacities varying from 22% (for the sodium form having the lower molar SiO2/Al2O3 ratio of 15, ZSM-5-(15)) to 43% (for the corresponding acid form, H-ZSM-5-(15)). Percent release of the drug-loaded ZSM-5 samples into simulated body fluid (SBF) was measured at pH 7.4 and 37°C. The results showed a slight variation in the % release within the range 84–93%, while the first-order rate constant (k) varied from 2.2 h−1 for ZSM-5-(15) to 3.9 h−1 for H-ZSM-5-(15). It was interesting to note that at the higher molar SiO2/Al2O3 ratios of 169, both the sodium form, ZSM-5-(169), and the acid form, H-ZSM-5-(169), exhibit an intermediate efficiency in either % loading (38%) or first-order kinetic release constant (k = 2.9 h−1).

1. Introduction

Chemotherapy is the most commonly used route for cancer treatment employing organic- and inorganic-based drugs. However, most of these drugs are known for their poor physicochemical properties such as low solubility, low stability, short circulating half-life, and cytotoxicity [1]. One of the problematic drugs that have been widely used in anticancer chemotherapy is 5-fluorouracil (Figure 1).

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is a water-soluble pyrimidine analogue which is widely used in the treatment of various kinds of cancer, especially colon, head, neck, and ovary cancers [2]. 5-FU can be used in oral, topical, and aerosolized formulations [3]. As a derivative of uracil, it rapidly enters the cell where it is converted into active metabolites that disrupt RNA synthesis and acts as inhibitor of thymidylate synthase, a nucleotide synthesis enzyme [4]. However, the oral use of 5-FU exhibits a short plasma half-life (30 min) as a result of its rapid enzymatic metabolism [5], which demands continuous high doses thus leading to high toxicity, incomplete and nonuniform oral distribution, drug resistance by tumor cells, and nonselective action against normal cells [6, 7].

Different delivery systems have been used to ensure prolonged and sustained release of 5-FU. Examples include hydrogels [8], biodegradable polymers [9], layered inorganic nanocomposites [6], mesoporous organosilica [10], magnetic nanocarriers [7], the clay mineral montmorillonite [11], organic-modified montmorillonite [12], hybrid TiO2/ZnO nanotubes [13], porous silica calcium phosphate nanocomposites [14], mesoporous silica systems [15], and thiol-functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles [16]. Recently, zeolites have been used in biomedical applications due to their biocompatibility and low toxicity [17, 18]. The small pore size of zeolites (0.3–0.8 nm) that matches the size of small drug molecules, in addition to the tunable properties that can be obtained by varying the molar SiO2/Al2O3 ratio, adds more advantages for utilizing zeolites in the medicinal field. Zeolites have been used as delivery systems for different types of drugs, including the adsorption of sulfonamide antibiotics onto zeolite Y [19], the use of NaY zeolite for encapsulation of the anticancer drug α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid [20], the study of sustained release of the anticancer drug doxorubicin from zeolite magnetite nanocomposites [21], and the loading onto and release of aspirin from zeolite HY [22]. Recently, both zeolite HY [23] and zeolite NaX-FAU [24] have been explored as delivery systems for 5-FU.

In this study, zeolites ZSM-5 and H-ZSM-5, each prepared in two different molar SiO2/Al2O3 ratios (169 and 15), have been investigated as probable drug delivery systems for 5-FU. This choice of ZSM-5 zeolite derivatives for investigation as a possible drug carrier for 5-FU was dictated by their having a promising 3D-channel structure with a suitable pore size, in addition to its reasonable good acid and thermal stability, in comparison with low silica zeolites.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Tetrapropylammonium bromide (+98%, Acros Organics), aluminum sulfate Al2(SO4)3·16H2O (Interchem), sodium chloride (BDH), BaCl2·2H2O (Merck), CaCl2·2H2O (Merck), MgCl2·6H2O (SD Fine-Chem Limited), sodium metasilicate nonahydrate (Na2SiO3·9H2O) (Aldrich), sulfuric acid (98%, SD Fine-Chem Limited), ammonium nitrate (RPL), NaHCO3 (Merck), KCl (Riedel de Haën), K2HPO4·3H2O (Merck), sodium hydroxide pellets (BDH), Na2SO4 (Merck), hydrochloric acid (35%, SD Fine-Chem Limited), nitric acid (95%, Merck), 5-fluorouracil (Acros Organics, 99%), and tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Merck) were used as received. The simulated body fluid (SBF) was prepared following literature procedure [25] by dissolving the following salts into a 1 L solution with deionized water: 8.036 g NaCl, 0.352 g NaHCO3, 0.225 g KCl, 0.230 g K2HPO4·3H2O, 0.311 g MgCl2·6H2O, 40.0 mL 1 M HCl, 0.388 g CaCl2·2H2O, 0.072 g Na2SO4, and 6.063 g tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane. The pH of solution was adjusted to 7.4 by 1 M HCl before being used.

2.2. Instrumentation (Physical Measurements)

X-ray powder diffraction spectra were measured using a Philips 2KW model X-ray diffractometer (Cu-Kα radiation source, λ = 1.5418 Å) at a scan rate of 2°C/min. Specific surface areas were estimated through BET modeling using a nitrogen adsorption/desorption instrument (Nova 2200e). UV-Visible spectra were recorded using a Cary 100 Bio UV-Visible spectrophotometer (Varian). FT-IR spectra (4000 to 400 cm−1, 4 cm−1 spectral resolution, KBr pellets) were measured using a Thermo Nicolet NEXUS 670 FT-IR spectrometer. Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) was conducted using a Netzsch Sta 409 PC instrument (Netzsch-Ger) and a Mettler-Toledo DSC 823 E instrument. The morphologies of the solid samples were monitored by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using an FEI-FEG INSPEC F50 instrument. The chemical composition of samples was determined using an X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (SHIMADZU model XRF-1800).

2.3. Synthesis of ZSM-5

Samples of zeolite ZSM-5 with two different molar SiO2/Al2O3 ratios were prepared following a literature procedure [26], with some modifications. In a typical procedure, the zeolite was prepared by mixing three solutions 1, 2, and 3. Solution 1 was prepared by dissolving sodium silicate (Na2SiO3·9H2O) (25.25 g) with deionized water (20.0 mL). Solution 2 was prepared by dissolving a specific amount of aluminum sulfate Al2(SO4)3·16H2O (0.40 g or 3.00 g depending on the required molar SiO2/Al2O3 ratio) and tetrapropylammonium bromide (1.59 g) in deionized water (10.0 mL). Solution 3 was prepared by dissolving sodium hydroxide (0.36 g) and sodium chloride (5.25 g) in deionized water (15.0 mL).

Solutions 2 and 3 were mixed, and then solution 1 was added dropwise. After vigorous stirring (~30.0 min), the pH was adjusted to the range 10.3–10.6 by adding concentrated sulfuric acid (98%). The hydrogel formed was transferred into an autoclave and heated for two days at 170°C. The solid product was filtered and washed with deionized water until the filtrate is sulfate-free (tested by BaCl2). The zeolite was dried at 110°C for one hour and then calcined at 550°C for 5 h to allow for the decomposition of the template.

2.4. Acid Activation of Zeolite ZSM-5

The sodium zeolite ZSM-5 was acid activated into H-ZSM-5 using the following typical procedure: a sample of ZSM-5 (1.00 g) was added to a 2.0 M solution of ammonium nitrite (50.0 mL) and the mixture was placed in a thermostated water bath/shaker at 80°C for 24 h, to obtain the ammonium exchanged zeolite, NH4-ZSM-5. The ammonium form of the zeolite was transformed to the acid form (H-ZSM-5) by calcination at 500°C for 4 h [27].

2.5. Loading of 5-FU into ZSM-5

5-FU was loaded into samples of ZSM-5 with two different molar SiO2/Al2O3 ratios via the following general procedure: 5-FU (≈0.400 g) was dissolved in water (25.0 mL) and then added to a flask containing ZSM-5 (~0.200 g). The mixture was stirred in the dark, at room temperature, for 24 h. The drug-loaded carrier was filtered and dried under vacuum (30 mmHg) for two hours at 60°C.

The loading capacities of drug-loaded samples were determined by TGA measurements within the temperature range 25–1100°C, under nitrogen. The drug loading capacity was also determined by UV-Visible absorption spectrophotometer, in which a predetermined amount of drug-loaded carrier (around 0.0100 g) was stirred with water (100.00 mL) for 24 hours at room temperature, the solution was then filtered, and the concentration of 5-FU was determined by measuring the absorbance at 266 nm. The total amount of drug contained in the sample was calculated with reference to a calibration curve.

2.6. 5-FU Release Profiles

The in vitro release of each 5-FU-loaded carrier was measured using the dialysis method (dialysis bag diffusion technique). A 5-FU-loaded sample (~0.0500 g) was introduced into a dialysis bag (MWCO = 3500 Da) containing SBF solution (2.00 mL; pH = 7.4). The sealed dialysis bag was immersed in a flask containing 198 mL SBF (pH = 7.4). The flask was covered and placed in a thermostatic water bath/shaker maintained at 37°C and a constant shaking rate of 120 rpm.

At predetermined time intervals (1/60, 5/60, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0, 10.0, 11.0, 12.0, and 13 hours), an aliquot (1.000 mL) was withdrawn from the flask and replaced by a fresh sample of SBF (1.000 mL, 37.0°C) to maintain a constant volume. The release experiments were conducted in triplicate.

The concentration of 5-FU released was determined by measuring the absorbance at 266 nm relative to a calibration curve of 5-FU in SBF. The calibration curve covered the concentration range of 0.50 to 20.00 ppm.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis of ZSM-5 and H-ZSM-5

ZSM-5 (sodium form) was prepared with two molar SiO2/Al2O3 ratios (169 and 15) by using a constant amount of sodium silicate and changing the aluminum content in the hydrogel (Table 1). Zeolite ZSM-5 was then acid activated into H-ZSM-5 via a two-step procedure; the first step involves exchange of the sodium ion by ammonium ion to form NH4-ZSM-5, which is then transformed into the acid form (H-ZSM-5) by calcination.


SampleNaSiO3·9H2O mass (g)Al2(SO4)3·16H2O mass (g)SiO2/

ZSM-5-(169)25.250.400169
ZSM-5-(15)25.253.00015

The number in brackets refers to the molar SiO2/Al2O3 ratio.
Molar ratios, determined by XRF.

3.2. Characterization of ZSM-5 and H-ZSM-5
3.2.1. X-Ray Diffraction

The XRD spectra of ZSM-5 samples having the molar SiO2/Al2O3 ratios of 15 and 169 appear almost exactly the same. Similarly, the XRD spectra for the acid activated samples were in agreement with the typical pattern for zeolite ZSM-5, thus confirming that the zeolite keeps its structure and crystallinity upon acid activation as shown in the spectra of ZSM-5-(15) and H-ZSM-5-(15) depicted in Figure 2.

3.2.2. Nitrogen Adsorption-Desorption Isotherms

In an ideal case, microporous materials should exhibit type I isotherm according to IUPAC classification [27]. A representative nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm of ZSM-5 samples is shown in Figure 3. In the relative pressure range from 0.0 to 1.0, the adsorption increased gradually with relative due to monolayer adsorption of N2 onto the microporous channels of ZSM-5. The desorption curve is very close to the adsorption curve in the whole range of . It was reported that highly siliceous ZSM-5 exhibits two hysteresis loops: one at high relative pressure and the other at low relative pressure, which eventually disappears as the aluminum content increases [28, 29].

The specific surface areas of ZSM-5 derivatives were estimated from the adsorption branch using the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) theory [30]. The results (Table 2) indicate a higher surface area for the acid activated sample than that of the corresponding sodium form. It also shows an increase in the surface area with an increase in the molar SiO2/Al2O3 ratio, for both forms [31].


Zeolite sampleSiO2/Al2O3 (molar ratio) (m2/g)

ZSM-5-(15)15194
ZSM-5-(169)169326
H-ZSM-5-(169)169369
H-ZSM-5-(15)15247

As to the effect of variations in acid activation and/or molar SiO2/Al2O3 ratio on the specific surface area of ZSM-5 zeolite, the following three observations are evident:(i)For the acid activated form H-ZSM-5, increasing the molar SiO2/Al2O3 ratio from 15 to 169 raises the specific surface area by ≈50% (247 up to 369 m2/g).(ii)For the sodium form ZSM-5, increasing the molar SiO2/Al2O3 ratio from 15 to 169 raises the specific surface area by ≈70% (194 up to 326 m2/g).(iii)For the sodium form ZSM-5, a combination of acid activation and increase in the molar SiO2/Al2O3 ratio, from 15 to 169, raises the specific surface area by ≈90% (194 up to 369 m2/g). Therefore, a combination of increasing molar SiO2/Al2O3 ratio and acid activation of ZSM-5 yields the highest specific surface area.

3.2.3. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Micrographs of ZSM-5

Estimates of the sizes of ZSM-5 and H-ZSM-5 particles, and their morphologies, were obtained through SEM micrographs. All micrographs depict homogeneous distribution of particles, with no significant effect of molar SiO2/Al2O3 ratio or acid activation on their size or shape. Some of the particles have elongated cubic shapes while others have hexagonal prismatic units with particle size distributions in the range of 0.4–0.8 μm. Examples of these micrographs are depicted for ZSM-5-(15) and H-ZSM-5-(15) in Figure 4.

3.3. Loading and Release of 5-FU
3.3.1. 5-FU Loading into Zeolite ZSM-5

With the dimensions shown in Figure 1, 5-FU is expected to enter the micropores of ZSM-5 readily. 5-FU was loaded into samples of zeolites ZSM-5 and H-ZSM-5 with the two different molar SiO2/Al2O3 ratios 169 and 15 by the impregnation method. The optimum conditions to obtain the highest % loading were attained using an aqueous 25.00 mL of 16.00 mg/mL solution of 5-FU and 0.20 g of the zeolite carrier (2 : 1 mass ratio of drug to carrier) and a stirring period of 24 hours. Loading of the drug into the ZSM-5 was confirmed by FTIR-spectrometry and XRD spectra. Inspection of the FTIR spectra of ZSM-5, 5-FU, and loaded ZSM-5, in the region 2000–1500 cm−1, confirms the presence of the drug in the loaded zeolite. The strong band centered at about 1770 cm−1 in the spectrum of free 5-FU (which is absent from the spectrum of unloaded ZSM-5) appears as a very weak band in the spectra of loaded ZSM-5 and loaded H-ZSM-5. Such drastic decrease in intensity is characteristic of compounds enclosed by porous materials [23]. Drug loading was also confirmed by the appearance of the 5-FU characteristic peak at 2θ = 29° in the XRD-spectrum of the drug-loaded ZSM-5 (Figure 5). This is an indication of 5-FU crystallization in the carrier pores.

The zeolite loading capacity for 5-FU was determined from the TGA thermograms of pure ZSM-5 and ZSM-5 loaded with 5-FU. Figure 6(a) shows decomposition of 5-FU within the range 280–350°C (m.p. of 5-FU = 282–286°C). However, one of the drug-loaded samples, 5-FU-ZSM-5-(15), lost about 40% of its mass below 400°C but eventually ended with 50% residual mass at 1100°C, thus indicating the thermal stability of the silicate carrier.

The zeolite loading capacity was also estimated by UV-Visible spectrophotometry, according to the following equation:Table 3 lists % loading of 5-FU into the sodium form of zeolite (ZSM-5) and the corresponding acid activated form (H-ZSM-5) for each of the two molar SiO2/Al2O3 ratios, 169 and 15. Inspection of the table indicates that the estimates of % loading, obtained for each of the four zeolite derivatives from TGA thermograms and UV absorption, are equivalent within experimental error.


Sample% loading (TGA data)% loading (UV data)

ZSM-5-(169)3838.0
H-ZSM-5-(169)4039.1
ZSM-5-(15)2122.0
H-ZSM-5-(15)4543.0

In view of data presented in Table 3, a lower molar SiO2/Al2O3 ratio plus acid activation of the sodium form of ZSM-5 yields the highest loading capacity for 5-FU. For example, at the lower molar SiO2/Al2O3 ratio of 15, acid activation of ZSM-5 doubles the % loading of 5-FU (22% up to 43%).

3.3.2. 5-FU Release from Zeolite ZSM-5

The in vitro cumulative release of 5-FU loaded into three different samples of zeolite ZSM-5 was studied. The effects of variation in the molar SiO2/Al2O3 ratio on the release profiles of 5-FU that was loaded into ZSM-5 having a molar SiO2/Al2O3 ratio of 15 and also into ZSM-5 having a molar ratio of 169 were measured. In addition, the effect of acid activation of zeolite on the release profile from ZSM-5 and H-ZSM-5 having the same molar SiO2/Al2O3 ratio (15) was also measured. The % release was evaluated utilizing the dialysis bag diffusion technique, in which dialysis bags with MWCO of 3500 Da were used. The dialysis bags retain the carrier particles within the bag but allow the released free drug molecules to diffuse into the simulated body fluid (SBF) medium at pH 7.4 and 37°C.

At predetermined time intervals (as specified in the experimental section), aliquots were withdrawn from the release medium and were readily replaced by fresh samples of SBF at the same conditions, in order to maintain a constant SBF volume. The release experiments were conducted in triplicate, and corresponding data averages of the three experiments were used for nonlinear regression analysis.

The withdrawn samples were analyzed for 5-FU concentration by measuring the absorbance at = 266 nm, following appropriate dilution and using a blank sample for base line correction. The concentration of 5-FU () was estimated with reference to a calibration curve of 5-FU, in SBF at the same conditions, according toThe measured concentration of 5-FU (in ppm) released into the buffer solution was used to estimate the cumulative drug release, , at time . The cumulative release represents the total amount of drug released (in mg) from the ZSM-5 carrier into the release medium, which was kept at a constant volume of 200 mL. For each sampling time , the amount of drug in all previously withdrawn samples is added to the amount of the drug in the release medium measured at time , thus giving rise to the cumulative drug release, .

The first-order kinetic model was used to simulate the kinetics of the drug release process. Nonlinear regression analysis was used to fit the experimental cumulative drug release against time , to the first-order drug release model given by the following equation [32]:where is the cumulative drug release (in mg), is the maximum amount of drug (in mg) that is released into the medium, is the release rate constant in h−1, and is the sampling time in hours.

Both and were used as floating parameters in nonlinear regression of against , and the best parameter estimates, thus obtained, were used to obtain a corresponding estimate of the best data fit. The % release was calculated by the normalization of the cumulative drug release of drug estimated for each time interval into the total quantity of drug in the loaded ZSM-5 zeolite sample. Plots of % release against time profiles for the three systems are depicted in Figure 7, where solid lines represent the best data fits.

The kinetic parameters for the release of 5-FU from the three carriers ZSM-5-(15), H-ZSM-5-(15), and ZSM-5-(169) are listed in Table 4. Analysis of those data indicates that upon acid activation the first-order release rate constant () increases from 2.2 h−1 for ZSM-5-(15) to 3.9 h−1 for H-ZSM-5-(15). The effect of molar SiO2/Al2O3 ratio can be seen by comparing the values for ZSM-5-(15) and ZSM-5-(169), which are 2.2 h−1 and 2.9 h−1, respectively. This might be attributed to the corresponding decrease of the aluminum content, which is responsible for the stronger attractive interaction forces between 5-FU and the zeolite ZSM-5 pore surface, thus impeding drug release. These results are in agreement with those reported for the release of 5-FU from zeolite HY [23].


5-FU loading data5-FU kinetic release models’ data
Zeolite
(mg)% loading (mg) (mg)% release (h−1) (h)

ZSM-5-(15)49.22210.810.47972.21.211.0
H-ZSM-5-(15)50.24321.619.8923.91.422.5
ZSM-5-(169)50.63819.216.2852.91.12.4

= average mass of the drug-loaded sample.
= average mass of the drug in the loaded sample (obtained from % loading).
= maximum mass of drug released into the SBF buffer solution.
% release = .
= first-order rate constant.
= Higuchi first burst constant.
= ratio of diffusion-to-erosion contributions to drug release.

The Higuchi square root time model [33], which is based on Fickian diffusion, was also applied to the initial first burst of drug release. This model assumes that the drug % release varies with the square root of time , which typically occurs relatively fast compared with subsequent release, and is given by the relationwhere is the mass of drug released at time , is the maximum mass released,  (h−1/2) is the Higuchi constant, and is a constant characteristic of the drug and host being formulated. Plots of % release of 5-FU, from zeolite ZSM-5, against are depicted in Figure 8.

In addition, estimates of the individual contributions of drug diffusion (), and drug erosion (), to 5-FU first burst were obtained through nonlinear regression analysis of data using Kopcha’s model [34] according toThe ratios thus obtained (Table 4) indicate that diffusion is the principal mechanism for release of 5-FU from zeolite ZSM-5 with different molar SiO2/Al2O3 ratios, both in the sodium and acid activated forms.

Table 5 lists the % loading and % release results of 5-FU obtained in this work, in addition to related data on micro- and mesoporous silicates that have been published in the literature. Inspection of the data reveals the following observations:(i)Successful use of zeolite ZSM-5 as a carrier for 5-FU with a relatively high loading capacity (≥40%) can be partially attributed to the close matching between the size of ZSM-5 micropores and that of the 5-FU molecule.(ii)Enhancements on the loading capacity and the first-order rate constant were observed upon acid activation of ZSM-5 and also upon increasing the molar SiO2/Al2O3 ratio from 15 to 169.(iii)A relatively high % release of 5-FU was achieved with the highest % release exhibited by ZSM-5 having a molar SiO2/Al2O3 ratio of 169 (≥85%).(iv)The first-order rate constant () increases with increasing the molar SiO2/Al2O3 ratio from 2.2 h−1 for Na-ZSM-5-(15) to 2.9 h−1 for Na-ZSM-5-(169) and increases upon acid activation (from 2.2 h−1 for Na-ZSM-5-(15) to 3.9 h−1 for H-ZSM-5-(15)).(v)Diffusion is the principal process governing 5-FU release from zeolite ZSM-5.


5-FU kinetic release models’ data
Siliceous materialReference
% loading% release (h−1) (h−1/2)

ZSM-5-(15)2297% after 3 hrs2.21.2This work
H-ZSM-5-(15)4392% after 3 hrs3.91.4
ZSM-5-(169)3885% after 3 hrs2.91.1

Zeolite NaX-FAU1683% after 3 min (0.1 M HCl)[24]

Zeolite HY-60963% after 5 hrs90[23]

MCM-41 8645% after 1 hr, 95% after 26 hrs0.243.3 [16]
Thiol-functionalized MCM-419920% after 2 hrs, 95% after 18 hrs0.1206

4. Conclusion

In this research work, zeolite ZSM-5 was synthesized with two different molar SiO2/Al2O3 ratios, which were both acid activated. The acid activated ZSM-5 with a molar SiO2/Al2O3 ratio of 169 shows the highest % loading and % release. As shown in Table 5, ZSM-5 exhibits about fourfold loading capacity and about twofold % release of 5-FU as compared with zeolite Y. With its relative good thermal and acid stability (compared with low silica zeolites) in addition to its high % loading (~40%) and % release (~85%), ZSM-5 may serve as a potential carrier for 5-FU.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the fruitful discussions of kinetic data with Professor M. Zughul. The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the Deanship of Academic Research, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan, and Scientific Research Support Fund (Grant no. Bas/2/02/2012), Amman, Jordan.

References

  1. H. Zhu, J. Cao, S. Cui, Z. Qian, and Y. Gu, “Enhanced tumor targeting and antitumor efficacy via hydroxycamptothecin-encapsulated folate-modified N-succinyl-N′-octyl chitosan micelles,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 1318–1332, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. S. Yan, J. Zhu, Z. Wang, J. Yin, Y. Zheng, and X. Chen, “Layer-by-layer assembly of poly(l-glutamic acid)/chitosan microcapsules for high loading and sustained release of 5-fluorouracil,” European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 336–345, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. L. Arias, “Novel strategies to improve the anticancer action of 5-fluorouracil by using drug delivery systems,” Molecules, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 2340–2369, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. D. B. Longley, D. P. Harkin, and P. G. Johnston, “5-Fluorouracil: mechanisms of action and clinical strategies,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 330–338, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. R. C. Mundargi, V. Rangaswamy, and T. M. Aminabhavi, “A novel method to prepare 5-fluorouracil, an anti-cancer drug, loaded microspheres from poly(N-vinyl caprolactam-co-acrylamide) and controlled release studies,” Designed Monomers and Polymers, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 325–336, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. B. D. Kevadiya, T. A. Patel, D. D. Jhala et al., “Layered inorganic nanocomposites: a promising carrier for 5-fluorouracil (5-FU),” European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 91–101, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. J. L. Arias, M. López-Viota, Á. V. Delgado, and M. A. Ruiz, “Iron/ethylcellulose (core/shell) nanoplatform loaded with 5-fluorouracil for cancer targeting,” Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 111–116, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. N. P. Bayramgil, “Synthesis, characterization and drug release behavior of poly(1-vinyl 1,2,4-triazole) hydrogels prepared by gamma irradiation,” Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, vol. 97, pp. 182–189, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. X. Cai, Q. Zhao, Y. Luan, Y. Jiang, J. Shi, and W. Shao, “Polymer fibrous materials composed of sodium carboxymethylcellulose and poly(vinyl alcohol) for a hydrophilic anticancer drug release,” Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 835–839, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. S. Moorthy, S.-S. Park, D. Fuping, S.-H. Hong, M. Selvaraj, and C.-S. Ha, “Step-up synthesis of amidoxime-functionalised periodic mesoporous organosilicas with an amphoteric ligand in the framework for drug delivery,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 22, no. 18, pp. 9100–9108, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. F. H. Lin, Y. H. Lee, C. H. Jian, J.-M. Wong, M.-J. Shieh, and C.-Y. Wang, “A study of purified montmorillonite intercalated with 5-fluorouracil as drug carrier,” Biomaterials, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 1981–1987, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. S. Gârea, A. Mihai, A. Ghebaur, C. Nistor, and A. Sârbu, “Porous clay heterostructures: a new inorganic host for 5-fluorouracil encapsulation,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 491, no. 1-2, pp. 299–309, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. H. A. M. Faria and A. A. A. de Queiroz, “A novel drug delivery of 5-fluorouracil device based on TiO2/ZnS nanotubes,” Materials Science and Engineering C, vol. 56, pp. 260–268, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  14. A. El-Ghannam, K. Ricci, A. Malkawi et al., “A ceramic-based anticancer drug delivery system to treat breast cancer,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 2701–2710, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. I. S. Carino, F. Testaa, F. Puocib, L. Pasquaa, and R. Aielloa, “Polymer coated silica-based mesoporous materials for controlled drug release,” in Proceedings of the 4th International FEZA Conference, PIII-A66, Paris, France, September 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  16. B. Murugan, L. N. Ramana, S. Gandhi, S. Sethuraman, and U. M. Krishnan, “Engineered chemoswitchable mesoporous silica for tumor-specific cytotoxicity,” Journal of Materials Chemistry B, vol. 1, no. 28, pp. 3494–3505, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. A. Petushkov, J. Intra, J. B. Graham, S. C. Larsen, and A. K. Salem, “Effect of crystal size and surface functionalization on the cytotoxicity of silicalite-1 nanoparticles,” Chemical Research in Toxicology, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 1359–1368, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. C. Larsen, “Nanocrystalline zeolites and zeolite structures: synthesis, characterization, and applications,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 111, no. 50, pp. 18464–18474, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. I. Braschi, S. Blasioli, L. Gigli, C. E. Gessa, A. Alberti, and A. Martucci, “Removal of sulfonamide antibiotics from water: evidence of adsorption into an organophilic zeolite Y by its structural modifications,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 178, no. 1–3, pp. 218–225, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. N. Vilac, R. Amorim, O. Martinho et al., “Encapsulation of α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid into a NaY zeolite,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 46, no. 23, pp. 7511–7516, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. Arruebo, R. Fernández-Pacheco, S. Irusta, J. Arbiol, M. R. Ibarra, and J. Santamaría, “Sustained release of doxorubicin from zeolite-magnetite nanocomposites prepared by mechanical activation,” Nanotechnology, vol. 17, no. 16, article 4057, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. A. Datt, D. Fields, and S. C. Larsen, “An experimental and computational study of the loading and release of aspirin from zeolite HY,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 116, no. 40, pp. 21382–21390, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. A. Datt, E. A. Burns, N. A. Dhuna, and S. C. Larsen, “Loading and release of 5-fluorouracil from HY zeolites with varying SiO2/Al2O3 ratios,” Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, vol. 167, pp. 182–187, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. M. Spanakis, N. Bouropoulos, D. Theodoropoulos et al., “Controlled release of 5-fluorouracil from microporous zeolites,” Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology, and Medicine, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 197–205, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. A. Oyane, H.-M. Kim, T. Furuya, T. Kokubo, T. Miyazaki, and T. Nakamura, “Preparation and assessment of revised simulated body fluids,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research—Part A, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 188–195, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  26. S. Ahmed, M. Z. El-Faer, M. M. Abdillahi, M. A. B. Siddiqui, and S. A. I. Barri, “Investigation of the rapid crystallization method for the synthesis of MFI-​type zeolites and study of the physicochemical properties of the products,” Zeolites, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 373–380, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. A. Saito and H. C. Foley, “High-resolution nitrogen and argon adsorption on ZSM-5 zeolites: effects of cation exchange and Si/Al ratio,” Microporous Materials, vol. 3, no. 4-5, pp. 543–556, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. K. Sing, “Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems,” Pure and Applied Chemistry, vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 2201–2218, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  29. J. Cejka, H. Van Bekkum, and C. Schueth, Introduction to Zeolite Molecular Sieves, Elsevier Science, New York, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 2007.
  30. H. Feng, C. Li, and H. Shan, “Effect of calcination temperature of kaolin microspheres on the in situ synthesis of ZSM-5,” Catalysis Letters, vol. 129, no. 1-2, pp. 71–78, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. L. Shirazi, E. Jamshidi, and M. R. Ghasemi, “The effect of Si/Al ratio of ZSM-5 zeolite on its morphology, acidity and crystal size,” Crystal Research and Technology, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 1300–1306, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. T. Heikkilä, J. Salonen, J. Tuura et al., “Evaluation of mesoporous TCPSi, MCM-41, SBA-15, and TUD-1 materials as API carriers for oral drug delivery,” Drug Delivery, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 337–347, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. T. Higuchi, “Mechanism of sustained-action medication. Theoretical analysis of rate of release of solid drugs dispersed in solid matrices,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 1145–1149, 1963. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. E. Chevalier, M. Viana, A. Artaud, S. Haddouchi, and D. Chulia, “A novel application of the T-cell for flow-through dissolution: the case of bioceramics used as ibuprofen carrier,” Talanta, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 1545–1548, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Ruba A. Al-Thawabeia and Hamdallah A. Hodali. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

4095 Views | 895 Downloads | 8 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.