Journal of Chemistry

Journal of Chemistry / 2017 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 |Article ID 3497216 |

Alexandra M. G. N. Mamede, Antonio G. Soares, Eder J. Oliveira, Adriana Farah, "Volatile Composition of Sweet Passion Fruit (Passiflora alata Curtis)", Journal of Chemistry, vol. 2017, Article ID 3497216, 9 pages, 2017.

Volatile Composition of Sweet Passion Fruit (Passiflora alata Curtis)

Academic Editor: Paula G. De Pinho
Received30 Jan 2017
Revised19 Apr 2017
Accepted04 May 2017
Published04 Jun 2017


Passiflora alata Curtis (sweet passion fruit) is a native species grown in South America, especially in Brazil. In addition to being aromatic, its pulp is sweeter and less acidic compared to traditional commercial passion fruits, and this makes it highly appreciated for fresh consumption. Its aroma is also very distinct from other passion fruit species but it has not been characterized so far. In the present study, for the first time, the volatile composition of sweet passion fruit was investigated. Two genotypes (BGM004 and BGM163) were evaluated and two SPME fibers were tested. Forty-five volatile compounds were properly identified and semiquantified. The carboxen-polydimethylsiloxane (CAR/PDMS) fiber presented better performance regarding both number and concentration of compounds. Esters and terpenes were the main volatile classes. Methyl butanoate, methyl (E)-2-butenoate, ethyl butanoate, ethyl (E)-2-butenoate, methyl 2-hexenoate, and ethyl-2-hexenoate were among major compounds. As complementary results, sugar content, titratable acidity, pH, and total soluble solids were evaluated.

1. Introduction

Passion fruits (Passifloraceae family, genus Passiflora) are appreciated worldwide. Their intense and exotic aroma and consequently strong flavor derive from a complex volatile composition, including mainly esters, followed by alcohols and terpenes, among other compounds [14]. Passion fruits are native of America and grow in the tropical and subtropical regions of the world. In the middle west and northeast regions of Brazil there are near 150 native species, from which about 60 are known to be edible [57]. However, only two are currently commercially important, P. edulis Sims f. flavicarpa Deg. (yellow passion fruit) and P. edulis f. edulis Sims (purple passion fruit) [4]. Other species hold promising sensory and nutritional characteristics and could be more explored commercially. P. alata Curtis (sweet passion fruit) is a native species grown in South America, especially in Brazil. It is also found in Peru, Paraguay, and Argentina [6].

This species holds interesting characteristics. Its aroma is quite distinct from other passion fruits and, in addition to being aromatic, its pulp contains higher sugar and lower organic acids concentrations compared to traditional commercial passion fruit species, which makes it sweeter and less sour. For this reason, sweet passion fruit has been highly appreciated for fresh consumption as a dessert, for example, rather than mainly for juice consumption as with other passion fruit species [69]. Consequently, its economic value has grown over the last years, corresponding currently to three to ten times the value of yellow species in Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, and Minas Gerais, the largest wholesale markets in Brazil [10].

While the volatile composition of other commercial passion fruits has been evaluated in several studies [1, 1113], to our knowledge, no information on the volatile composition of sweet passion fruit is available in the literature. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the volatile composition of genotypes of sweet passion fruits grown in the experimental fields of Embrapa, in Northeast Brazil. For this, two types of solid-phase microextraction (SPME) fibers were compared.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Samples

Two genotypes of sweet passion fruit belonging to the Passiflora germoplasm depository of Embrapa (BGM004 and BGM163) (Figure 1) were grown in the Experimental Fields of Embrapa Cassava and Fruits, Cruz das Almas, BA, Brazil (South latitude 12°48′38′′, Greenwich West longitude 39°6′26′′, average temperature 22.7°C, and precipitation 4.5 mm H2O). The fruits were harvested 10–12 months after planting, when about 75% of the peel was yellow (75% ripe) (Figure 1). Two days later, when the peel was 100% yellow (full ripe), fruits were depulped in a horizontal depulper (Bonina 0,25 dF), equipped with a 0.8 mm diameter sieve. Following that, fruits were frozen with liquid nitrogen, stored at −20°C, and transported for immediate analysis.

2.2. Extraction of Volatile Compounds

The extraction of volatile compounds was performed by solid-phase microextraction (SPME). Two SPME fibers (Supelco Inc., Bellefonte, PA, USA) [14, 15] were compared: a 75 µm carboxen-polydimethylsiloxane (CAR/PDMS) (biphasic fiber) and a 50/30 µm divinylbenzene-carboxen-polydimethylsiloxane (DVB/CAR/PDMS) (triphasic fiber). Fibers were activated according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For extraction, 4.0 g of fruit pulp was mixed with 5% of NaCl in a sealed 15 mL vial with a magnetic stirring. The vial was placed in a silicone bath at 40°C for 20 min, to achieve the partition equilibrium between sample and headspace. Following that, the SPME fiber was exposed to the headspace for 40 min to adsorb the volatile compounds. The fiber was then introduced into the gas chromatograph injection port for 5 min at 250°C for desorption, followed by a 10 min desorption in a separate GC injection port as cleaning protocol to prevent analyte carryover. Analyses were carried out in duplicate.

2.3. Analyses of Volatile Compounds
2.3.1. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry

The analyses of volatile compounds were performed in a GC/MS system (Agilent®, Palo Alto, Ca), consisted of a gas chromatographer (model 6890) coupled to a quadrupole mass selective detector (model 5973N). A HP-5 MS capillary column (5% phenyl-methylpolysiloxane) (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm film thickness) was used. Helium was used as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The injector temperature was kept at 250°C in splitless mode; oven temperature gradient program was 40°C for 3 min, rising to 130°C at 3°C/min and to 260°C at 10°C/min, where it was maintained for 3 min. The mass detector was operated at 150°C, in electron impact mode at 70 eV. The ion source temperature was 230°C and the transfer line was kept at 280°C. Scan interval for mass spectral data acquisition was 1.0 s and data were collected over a mass range () from 35 to 350 u.

2.3.2. Identification and Semiquantification of the Volatile Compounds

Total ion chromatograms (TIC) were processed using the automated data processing software MDS ChemStation (Agilent Technologies, 2008). For compounds identification, the Wiley library (6th edition), linear retention indexes (Kovats indexes), and analytical standards were used. For Kovats index calculation, a standard mixture of n-alkanes (C8 a C26) (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) was injected into the CG/MS under the same analysis conditions of samples. Peaks were then identified according to values obtained from Adams [16], Pherobase [17], and NIST Chemistry WebBook [18].

The following analytical standards were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Germany): ethyl butanoate, ethyl crotonate, butyl acetate, butyl butanoate, ethyl hexanoate, hexyl acetate, propyl hexanoate, ethyl octanoate, octyl acetate, isoamylhexanoate, methyl acetate, hexyl hexanoate, ethyl decanoate, citronellyl acetate, 2-heptenal, nonanal, trans-2-nonenal, decanal, cis-3-hexen-1-ol, trans-3-hexen-1-ol, hexan-1-ol, 1-octanol, linalool, α-pinene, β-pinene, myrcene, limonene, γ-terpinene, α-terpinene, terpinolene, α-ionone, β-ionone, 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one, rose oxide, and citronellol.

Semiquantification of the identified peaks was performed to compare the amount of volatile compounds obtained for both genotypes as well as to evaluate the effect of the fiber type in adsorption-desorption. The semiquantification was performed using calibration curves made of 5 concentration levels (0.2–60 μg of standard per vial) of 10 representative compounds for the main volatile classes in passion fruit: ethyl butanoate, ethyl hexanoate, hexyl hexanoate, ethyl crotonate, hexan-1-ol, linalool, 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one, limonene, γ-terpinene, and decanal (Sigma-Aldrich).

2.4. Complementary Physicochemical and Chemical Analyses

Complementary analyses were performed to characterize the sweet passion fruit genotypes. Titratable acidity, expressed in g of citric acid/100 g, was determined by titration with NaOH (0.1 N) up to pH 8.1 with automatic titrator Metrohm 794 Basic Titrino, according to AOAC [19]; pH determination was performed by a potentiometric method according to AOAC [19] using automatic titrator Metrohm 794 Basic Titrino; total soluble solids were determined directly in the fruit pulp using digital refractometer Atago PR-101 (Atago Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Results were expressed in °Brix, according to AOAC [19]. Analyses of glucose, fructose, and sucrose were determined by HPLC as described by Macrae [20]. For this, a Waters Alliance 2695 liquid chromatographer coupled to a Waters 2410 refractive index detector and amino column (High Performance Carbohydrate) with 4.6 mm × 250 mm at 30°C were used. As mobile phase, 75% acetonitrile in Milli-Q water at a rate of 1.5 mL/min was used and the injection volume was 20 µL.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Results were analyzed by factorial ANOVA, followed by Fisher or LSD test for means comparison, using the software Statistica®, version 8.0, USA. values < 0.05 were considered significant. Comparisons were performed among genotypes and SPME fibers.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Analysis of Volatile Compounds

A hundred and three volatile compounds were detected in both genotypes of passion fruit, by both fibers. From these compounds, 45 (44% of total detected peaks) were properly identified (Table 1). It was not possible to identify the remaining peaks in the chromatograms due to the inexistence of such information in the 6th edition of the Wiley library, in the Adams [16] and in NIST Chemistry WebBook [18]. This could be expected, since this is the first report on sweet passion fruit analysis. The concentrations of volatile compounds in both evaluated genotypes of sweet passion fruits are presented in Table 1.

Volatile compoundsBGM 004BGM 163


1Methyl acetate<700515C1090.82 Aa138.86 Ba683.69 Ab244.59 Ba
2Ethyl acetate<700609C662.35nd538.2996.82
3Methyl butanoate727728B8268.604639.158726.593446.35
4Methyl (E)-2-butenoate775726B21329.756748.3819534.154967.46
5Ethy butanoate808804A9166.855515.436302.832989.42
6Ethyl (E)-2-butenoate853865A11048.18 Aa3207.06 Ba5508.82 Ab1291.36 Bb
8Methyl 3-hydroxybutanoate881858B109.2253.05185.54188.91
9Propyl butanoate901896B98.5648.0644.9121.11
10Methyl hexanoate930927B982.20 Aa414.11 Ba488.92 Ab138.88 Bb
11Methyl 2-hexenoate976C20485.316168.5915317.834308.00
12Butyl butanoate998994A325.58 Aa145.04 Ba102.55 Ab65.00 Aa
13Ethyl hexanoate1002998A1536.22 Aa779.36 Ba498.82 Ab203.74 Bb
14Ethyl-2-hexenoate10551044B12026.88 Aa5692.67 Ba3102.64 Ab1922.25 Ab
15Methyl benzoate10931090B636.45419.12760.52688.96
16Hexyl butanoate11931192B252.3196.14325.1734.00
17Octyl acetate12131211A826.84962.88112.22122.00
18Hexyl (2E) butanoate12441242B219.14 Aa87.18 Ba36.85 Ab67.03 Aa
19Ethyl (E)-2-octenoate12491249B284.23322.8731.3946.28
20Methyl geranate13251323B20.14 Ba41.32 Aa6.45 Aand
21Benzyl butanoate13461345B9.8818.27tr8.18
22(E)-Methyl cinnamate13821379B18.40 Aa5.30 Aand9.50 Aa
23Hexyl hexanoate13861383A2090.46nd1022.14nd
24Octyl butanoate13891384B93.24 Ba195.57 Aa27.86 AaTR
25Hexyl octanoate15831582B49.47 Aand13.87Abnd
26Methyl dihydrojasmonate1660CNd9.34ndnd


28p-Cymene10281026B19.35Aa1.04 Ba15.74 Aa0.71 Ba
35Allo-ocimene11311132B33.93 Aa12.64 Ba16.81 Ab8.62 Aa
37Bornylene1379C1.94 Ba3.31 Aand0.28Ab

Terpene aldehyde


Terpene ketone





43Acetic acid711Cndndtrtr



Aromatic compound


IUPAC name for methyl trans-crotonate; IUPAC name for ethyl (E)-crotonate; nd: nondetected; tr: unquantifiable traces; different capital letters indicate difference at 95% significance between fibers within the same genotype by ANOVA followed by LSD test; different lower case letters indicate difference at 95% significance between genotypes for the same fiber by ANOVA followed by LSD test; Kovats index value (KI) calculated for the HP-5 MS (5% phenyl-methylpolysiloxane) column; Kovats index value (KI) using literature data (Adams, 2001; Pherobase, 2012). The reliability of the identification proposal is indicated by the following: A: mass spectrum, retention time, and Kovats index agreed with standards; B: mass spectrum agreed with Wiley data and Kovats index agreed with literature data (Adams, 2001; Pherobase, 2012); C: mass spectrum agreed with Wiley virtual library of mass spectral (Kovats index not found in the searched literature).

In relation to the number and identity of compounds, the results of both fibers were similar for both genotypes studied, with only few differences between them: a total of 42 compounds were identified when CAR/PDMS fiber was used, while, using DVB/CAR/PDMS fiber, 41 compounds were identified, in both genotypes. The volatile compounds hexyl hexanoate, hexyl octanoate, dihydro-β-ionone, and 6,10-dimethyl-2-undecanone were identified only when CAR/PDMS was used, while methyl dihydrojasmonate, limonene, and 2-heptanol were identified only when DVB/CAR/PDMS was used. When studying yellow passion fruit, Carasek and Pawliszyn [13] also obtained a better performance with CAR/PDMS fiber, compared to CAR/DVB/PDMS fiber.

Esters comprised the major class of identified compounds in both fibers, corresponding to 60% and 59% of total number of identified compounds, in CAR/PDMS and DVB/CAR/PDMS, respectively. Terpenic hydrocarbons followed, with 24% and 27%, respectively. Together, these two classes correspond to about 85% of all identified compounds (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)). Additional classes were terpenic aldehydes (2.4% and 2.4%, respectively), terpenic ketones (4.8% and 2.4% resp.), alcohols (2.4% and 4.9% resp.), ketones (2.4% and 0.0% resp.), organic acids (2.4% and 2.4% resp.), and aromatic compounds (2.4% and 2.4% resp.) (Figures 2(b) and 2(c)).

Despite the similarity in the number of compounds extracted within each chemical class, CAR/PDMS fiber showed better extraction capacity, about 180% higher for most compounds, when compared to DVB/CAR/PDMS (Figure 2(d)). Exceptions were methyl geranate, octyl butanoate, and bornylene, in BGM004 genotype, with concentrations about 105%, 110%, and 71% higher, respectively, in DVB/CAR/PDMS fiber compared to CAR/PDMS. Another exception was limonene, identified only when DVB/CAR/PDMS fiber was used in both genotypes studied (Table 1).

Thus, when using SPME technique, considering both, the number of extracted compounds and their concentration, CAR/PDMS fiber was shown to be more suitable for volatile compounds extraction in sweet passion fruits. Hence, the discussion will be based only on results from this fiber, but including limonene, which was only extracted by CAR/DVB/PDMS fiber. It is worth mentioning that SPME and other techniques used for extraction do not necessarily fully reflect the compounds distribution and concentration in the fruit headspace. However, they are needed in order to concentrate the volatile compounds and enable the detection of compounds that otherwise would probably not be detected. Perhaps the CAR/DVB/PDMS fiber could reflect more accurately the headspace reality but since there are no studies evaluating the volatile composition of sweet passion fruit, we chose the fiber that presented better performance in terms of number and concentration of compounds.

Although similar chromatographic profiles were observed for both genotypes (Figure 3), higher concentration of total volatile compounds (92.4 mg/100 g of pulp), was observed in BGM004 compared to BGM163 (63.8 mg/100 g of pulp) (Figure 2(d)) (Note. both values were obtained using CAR/PDMS fiber). Indeed, BGM004 presented higher concentration of all major volatile compounds, except for methyl butanoate, whose concentration was statistically similar in both genotypes. Such higher concentration was reflected in a stronger aroma and flavor in sensory analysis compared to BGM163 (unpublished data).

The classes of volatile compounds identified in sweet passion fruit genotypes are discussed below.

3.1.1. Esters

As previously mentioned, esters comprised the main class of compounds in sweet passion fruit, both in number and in concentration, as they do for yellow and purple species [1, 2, 4, 1214, 2124].

The following major esters quantified in BMG 004 were organized in order of abundance, accounting for 89% of total volatile compounds: methyl (E)-2-butenoate (methyl trans-crotonoate) (23.08% of total), methyl 2-hexenoate (22%), ethyl-2-hexenoate (13%), ethyl (E)-2-butenoate (ethyl trans-crotonoate) (12%), ethyl butanoate (10%), and methyl butanoate (9%). In BMG 163, the most abundant compounds were methyl (E)-2-butenoate (methyl trans-crotonoate) (31%), methyl 2-hexenoate (24%), methyl butanoate (14%), ethyl butanoate (10%), ethyl (E)-2-butenoate (ethyl trans-crotonoate) (8.6%), and ethyl-2-hexenoate (4.9%), accounting for 92% of total volatile compounds.

Esters are well-known as major contributors to the characteristic fruity, floral, and sweet aromas of a wide variety of fruits [25]. The highest concentrations of esters in passion fruit in general were observed in C-2 to C-8 saturated and unsaturated esters. These are produced biosynthetically by β-oxidation of C-2 to C-8 fatty acids in acyl-CoA that react with alcohols, resulting in aliphatic esters [2, 4, 26].

In yellow and purple passion fruits, esters containing two to six carbons (C-2 to C-6) are important for their typical aroma, especially ethyl butanoate and ethyl hexanoate. Other esters including butyl acetate, butyl butanoate, hexyl butanoate, hexyl hexanoate, and 2-methylbutyl hexanoate also contribute to passion fruit characteristic aroma and flavor [4, 11, 22, 24, 27]. However, the esters butyl acetate and 2-methylbutyl hexanoate were not identified in sweet passion fruit, evidencing important differences among the aromas of passion fruit species.

Regarding the impact compounds identified in sweet passion fruits, as there are no previous studies evaluating the volatile composition of this species and no olfatometric techniques were used in the present study, it was not possible to identify them. However, based on literature data for other passion fruit species [4, 24], ethyl butanoate and ethyl hexanoate could be important compounds responsible for sweet passion fruit aroma and flavor [11, 24, 28]. In addition, ethyl butanoate is known to be an important ester for the aroma of other tropical fruits, like cashew fruit (or cashew apple) and guava [29, 30]. Another possible important impact compound is methyl butanoate, which was a major compound in the present study. According to the literature, this is an important impact compound in other passion fruit species [12, 14, 22, 24], imparting sweet-like, fruity (ripe), flowery, caramel like, greenish, acidic, vinegar, passion fruit, tutti-frutti, and strawberry notes [31].

Ethyl crotonoate, one of the main esters identified in the present study, has also been cited as a high threshold impact compound in yellow passion fruit essence [11], but not for the fresh fruit. It has sweet-like, fruity (ripe), and cashew fruit and pineapple notes [31] and may be an important compound for sweet passion fruit aroma.

Ethyl acetate has a fruity aroma. This compound has been characterized as impact compound in apricot during the fruit maturation [32]. Although it has not been listed as an impact compound in Passiflora species [11], its role in sweet passion fruit aroma and sensory profile should be investigated, since its concentration in this species is much higher than in other commercial passion fruit species [4, 11, 21].

Butyl acetate, hexyl acetate, propyl hexanoate, ethyl octanoate, octyl acetate, isoamyl hexanoate, ethyl decanoate, and citronellyl acetate, which have been previously identified in yellow and purple passion fruits [4, 11, 21, 24], were investigated in the present study and not identified in any of the genotypes.

3.1.2. Terpenes and Terpene Derivatives

The chromatographic profiles of terpenes and derivatives were also similar in both genotypes, except for trans-β-ocimene and bornylene, both present in higher concentration in BGM004 genotype (Table 1).

Myrcene, linalool, α-terpineol, limonene, trans-β-ocimene, and cis-β-ocimene are among the terpenes and terpene derivatives commonly reported as contributors to the aroma and flavor of yellow and purple passion fruits [4, 11, 24, 33]. Only limonene and trans-β-ocimene were identified in sweet passion fruit, which shows once more the singularity of this species. These compounds have odor descriptions of citrus/herbal and sweet/almost floral, respectively [4, 11], and may be important for the sweet passion fruit flavor.

The terpenes cis-ocimene and terpinolene identified in the present study have been previously identified by Chen et al. [22], Jordán et al. [11], and Carasek and Pawliszyn [13] in yellow and purple passion fruits, although they have not been identified as impact compounds. The terpenes p-cymene, γ-terpinene, and limonene are known as important impact compounds for citrus and citrus peel aroma [34, 35] and could be an impact compound as well in sweet passion fruit.

Low concentrations of the terpene ketones β-ionone and dihydro-β-ionone have been identified in commercial passion fruits [12, 13, 21], where β-ionone is an impact compound with floral notes. These compounds were also identified in apricot and in essential oil of citrus peel [32, 34] and may be important for the sweet passion fruit aroma and flavor.

Low concentrations of the terpene 3-δ-carene have also been previously identified in yellow passion fruit [13, 22]. This compound is also one of the major volatile compounds in mango cultivars, contributing to their aroma and flavor [36, 37]. Therefore, its potential contribution to sweet passion fruit aroma needs to be investigated.

Linalool, α-pinene, β-pinene, myrcene, α-terpinene, α-ionone, rose oxide, and citronellol, which have been previously identified in yellow and purple passion fruits, were investigated and not identified in any of the sweet passion fruit genotypes.

3.1.3. Other Classes of Volatile Compounds

The alcohols 1-hexanol and 2-heptanol, which are among impact compounds in commercial passion fruits aroma [22, 25, 38], were identified in the present study (Table 1) and may be important for sweet passion fruit aroma.

Aldehydes and organic acids have been identified in other passion fruit species [4, 11, 22, 28], but not in the sweet passion fruit, except for very low concentrations of acetic acid (possibly derived from pulp fermentation), identified in BGM163 only [38].

The only ketone identified was 6,10-dimethyl-2-undecanone, which has not been previously identified in passion fruits in general and could possibly derive from terpenes degradation.

According to Werkhoff et al. [21], trace concentrations of sulfur volatiles are associated with the aroma of yellow passion fruit. In the present study, they were not identified, possibly due to the use of SPME technique or due to their inexistence in sweet passion fruit.

The aldehydes, alcohols and ketone 2-heptenal, nonanal, trans-2-nonenal, decanal, cis-3-hexen-1-ol, trans-3-hexen-1-ol, 1-octanol, and 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one, which have been identified in yellow and purple passion fruits, were investigated and not identified in any of the sweet passion fruit genotypes.

3.2. Analyses of Sugars, pH, and Titratable and Soluble Solids

Complementary analyses for fruits characterization were performed and the results are presented in Table 2. Mean total sugars content (15.4 g/100 g) was considerably higher than the literature values for yellow and purple passion fruits [3941]. Pruthi and Lal [40] and Ramaiya et al. [42] found averages of 10.0 and 14.3 g/100 g of total sugars, respectively, in purple passion fruits. In yellow passion fruits, Janzantti et al., [24]; Ramaiya et al. [42]; and Macoris et al. [39] found on average 5.25, 5.75, and 6.98 g/100 g, respectively.

ParameterBGM 004BGM 163

Titratable acidity (g citric acid/100 g)
Total soluble solids (°Brix)
Fructose (g fructose/100 g)
Glucose (g glucose/100 g)
Sucrose (g sucrose/100 g)
Total sugar (g/100 g)

Means of triplicates ± standard deviation. Different letters in the same row indicate significant differences by ANOVA, followed by LSD test at 95% significance.

The titratable acidity value for sweet passion fruit (1.54 g citric acid/100 g) was about 30% lower than the values obtained by Macoris et al. for yellow passion fruit [39]. Mean pH value (3.71) was about 17% and 5% higher than values found for yellow and purple passion fruits, respectively, by Ramaiya et al. [42].

Mean soluble solids value obtained for sweet passion fruit in the present study was 18.7 °Brix, about 20% higher than the value obtained by Macoris et al. [39] for yellow passion fruit. It is worth mentioning that total soluble solids content is one of the most important parameters required by the fruit juice industry because it gives more body to fresh juices and increases productivity in concentrated juices [41]. A minimum of 13 °Brix was required by Bruckner et al. [41] for production of fruits juices.

4. Conclusion

In the present study, for the first time, the volatile composition of sweet passion fruit genotypes was evaluated, with forty-five peaks being properly identified. The carboxen-polydimethylsiloxane fiber (CAR/PDMS) was more appropriate for aroma analysis in this species. Although both evaluated genotypes presented similar chromatographic profiles, higher total concentration of volatile compounds was observed in BMG004 compared to BMG163. Their aroma profile was very distinct compared to those of yellow and purple species reported in the literature. Special attention should be given to methyl (E)-2-butenoate and ethyl (E)-2-butenoate, which were important compounds in this species and are present in very low concentrations in yellow and purple passion fruits. Although sweet passion fruit has not been as explored as other passion fruit species, this is a flavorful species that can be consumed not only in natura, but the high sugar and soluble contents associated with the low acidity create a promising ingredient to integrate blends for the production of naturally sweet passion fruit and mixed fruit juices among other possibilities.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.


The authors would like to thank the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES); the Brazilian National Research Council (CNPq); and the Rio de Janeiro State Research Support Foundation (FAPERJ) for scholarships and funding.


  1. D. J. Casimir, J. F. Kefford, and F. B. Whitfield, “Technology and flavor chemistry of passion fruit juices and concentrates,” Advances in Food Research, vol. 27, no. C, pp. 243–295, 1981. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. D. B. Rodriguez-Amaya, Passion Fruit, Elsevier, 2nd edition, 2003.
  3. J. S. Souza, C. E. L. Cardoso, M. I. S. Folegatti, and F. C. A. U. Matsuura, “Mercado mundial,” in Maracujá: Pós-Colheita, F. Emando, C. A. U. Marsuum, and M. I. S. Folegatti, Eds., pp. 9–12, DF: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, Brasília, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  4. N. Narain, N. Nigam, and M. S. Galvão, “Passion fruit,” in Handbook of Fruit and Vegetable Flavors, Y. H. Hui, Ed., pp. 345–390, John Wiley Sons, Inc, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  5. K. Dhawan, S. Dhawan, and A. Sharma, “Passiflora: a review update,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. L. C. Bernacci, L. M. M. Meletti, and M. D. Soares-Scott, “Sweet-passion-fruit: the autor, data and publication of the scientific name of Passiflora alata (Passifloraceae),” Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 355-356, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  7. M. A. P. Cunha, L. V. Barbosa, and N. T. V. Junqueira, “Espécies de maracujazeiro,” in Maracujá Produção: Aspectos Técnicos, Frutas do, A. A. Lima, Ed., 24, p. 15, DF: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, Brasília, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  8. H. P. S. Filho and T. V. Junqueira, Maracujá: fitossanidade, DF: Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura, Brasília, 2003.
  9. T. F. Fumis and A. C. Sampaio, “Aspectos botânicos do maracujá-doce (Passiflora alata Dryand),” in Maracujá-doce – Aspectos técnicos e econômicos, S. Leonel and A. C. Sampaio, Eds., pp. 25–29, UNESP, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  10. Agricultural News, ““Cotação: Maracujá - Ceasas - Notícias Agrícolas,” Maracujá - Ceasas, 2017,” View at: Google Scholar
  11. M. J. Jordán, K. L. Goodner, and P. E. Shaw, “Characterization of the aromatic profile in aqueous essence and fruit juice of yellow passion fruit (Passiflora edulis Sims F. Flavicarpa degner) by GC-MS and GC/O,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 1523–1528, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. N. Narain, J. N. Almeida, M. S. Galvão, M. S. Madruga, and E. S. Brito, ““Volatile compounds in passion fruit (Passiflora edulis forma Flavicarpa) and yellow mombin (Spondias mombin L.) fruits obtained by dynamic headspace technique,” Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 212–216, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  13. E. Carasek and J. Pawliszyn, “Screening of tropical fruit volatile compounds using solid-phase microextraction (SPME) fibers and internally cooled SPME fiber,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 54, no. 23, pp. 8688–8696, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. Pontes, J. C. Marques, and J. S. Câmara, “Headspace solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography-quadrupole mass spectrometric methodology for the establishment of the volatile composition of Passiflora fruit species,” Microchemical Journal, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. A. T. Toci and A. Farah, “Volatile compounds as potential defective coffee beans' markers,” Food Chemistry, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 1133–1141, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. R. P. Adams, Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectorscopy, Allured Publishing Corporation, 2007.
  17. Pherobase, “Kovats Retention Index,”, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  18. NIST, “'NIST Chemistry WebBook,' Chemical Name Search,,”, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. AOAC, Official Methods of the Association of the Agricultural Chemists, ASSOCIATION OF OFFICIAL AGRICULTURAL CHEMISTS, Washington, Dc, USA, 15th edition, 2000. View at: Publisher Site
  20. R. Macrae, Food science and technology: a series of monoghraphys: HPLC in food analysis, Academic Press, New York, 2nd edition, 1998.
  21. P. Werkhoff, M. Güntert, G. Krammer, H. Sommer, and J. Kaulen, “Vacuum Headspace Method in Aroma Research: Flavor Chemistry of Yellow Passion Fruits,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 1076–1093, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. C.-C. Chen, M.-C. Kuo, L. S. Hwang, J. S.-B. Wu, and C.-M. Wu, “Headspace components of passion fruit juice,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1211–1215, 1982. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. D. N. HIU and P. J. SCHEUER, “The Volatile Constituents of Passion Fruit Juice,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 557–563, 1961. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. N. S. Janzantti, M. S. Macoris, D. S. Garruti, and M. Monteiro, “Influence of the cultivation system in the aroma of the volatile compounds and total antioxidant activity of passion fruit,” LWT - Food Science and Technology, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 511–518, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. H.-D. Belitz, W. Grosch, and P. Schieberle, “Aroma compounds,” in Food Chemistry, H.-D. Belitz, W. Grosch, and P. Schieberle, Eds., vol. 92, pp. 340–402, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Berlin, Germany, 4th edition, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  26. W. Schwab, R. Davidovich-Rikanati, and E. Lewinsohn, “Biosynthesis of plant-derived flavor compounds,” Plant Journal, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 712–732, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. T. Shibamoto and C. S. Tang, “Minor tropical fruits - mango, papaya, passion fruit and guava,” in Food flavours. Part C: The flavour of fruits, I. D. Morton and A. J. MacLeod, Eds., vol. 6, pp. 221–280, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. N. Narain and P. S. Bora, “Post‐harvest changes in some volatile flavour constituents of yellow passion fruit (Passiflora edulis f. flavicarpa),” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 529-530, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. K. L. Sampaio, A. C. T. Biasoto, and M. A. A. P. Da Silva, “Comparison of techniques for the isolation of volatiles from cashew apple juice,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 299–312, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. J. A. Pino and L. Bent, “Odour-active compounds in guava (Psidium guajava L. cv. Red Suprema),” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 93, no. 12, pp. 3114–3120, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. BCV, “Banco de Compostos Voláteis,”, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  32. I. Gokbulut and I. Karabulut, “SPME-GC-MS detection of volatile compounds in apricot varieties,” Food Chemistry, vol. 132, no. 2, pp. 1098–1102, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. J. A. P. Alea, “Los constituyentes volátiles de la fruta de la pasión,” in Alimentaria: Revista de tecnología e Higiene de Los Alimentos, vol. 280 of Ediciones y Publicaciones Alimentarias, pp. 73–82, EYPASA, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  34. H.-S. Choi, “Character impact odorants of Citrus Hallabong [(C. unshiu Marcov x C. sinensis Osbeck) x C. reticulata Blanco] cold-pressed peel oil,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 2687–2692, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  35. Á. Högnadóttir and R. L. Rouseff, “Identification of aroma active compounds in orange essence oil using gas chromatography-olfactometry and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 998, no. 1-2, pp. 201–211, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. J. A. Pino, J. Mesa, Y. Muñoz, M. P. Martí, and R. Marbot, “Volatile components from mango (Mangifera indica L.) cultivars,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 2213–2223, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. H. Strohalm, M. Dregus, A. Wahl, and K.-H. Engel, “Enantioselective analysis of secondary alcohols and their esters in purple and yellow passion fruits,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 55, no. 25, pp. 10339–10344, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. A. P. da Silva, S. A. Lacerda, and R. L. Vieites, “Conservação pós-colheita do maracujá doce com ceras comerciais,” Boletim CEPPA, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 103–114, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  39. M. S. Macoris, R. de Marchi, N. S. Janzantti, and M. Monteiro, “The influence of ripening stage and cultivation system on the total antioxidant activity and total phenolic compounds of yellow passion fruit pulp,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 92, no. 9, pp. 1886–1891, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. J. S. Pruthi and G. Lal, “Chemical composition of passion fruit (Passiflora Edulis, Sims.),” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 188–192, 1959. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. C. H. Bruckner, L. M. M. Meletti, W. C. Otoni, and F. M. Zerbini Júnior, “Maracujazeiro,” in Melhoramento de Fruteiras Tropicais, C. H. Bruckner, Ed., pp. 373–410, UFV, Viçosa, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  42. S. D. Ramaiya, J. S. Bujang, M. H. Zakaria, W. S. King, and M. A. S. Sahrir, “Sugars, ascorbic acid, total phenolic content and total antioxidant activity in passion fruit (Passiflora) cultivars,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 93, no. 5, pp. 1198–1205, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2017 Alexandra M. G. N. Mamede et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.