Composition, Physicochemical Properties, and Uses of Acorn Starch
The major component of acorn is starch, which may amount up to 55% of the dry weight. Lack of systematic knowledge on acorn starch greatly hinders the further development of acorns as sustainable crops. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge of the isolation, chemical composition, physicochemical properties, and uses of acorn starches and to provide future research directions. The amylose content of the acorn starches is reported to vary in the range of 20–39%. Moisture content, lipid, ash, and protein contents of the acorn starches have been reported varying from 2.20 to 15.50%, 0.23 to 2.64%, 0.01 to 1.41%, and 0.01 to 6.7%, respectively. Thermal and pasting properties that have usually been determined using differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) and rapid viscoanalyzer (RVA) are also discussed in this article. Acorn starch has great potential for various food and nonfood applications due to the unique structural and functional features.
Quercus spp. (oaks) represent an important genus of the Fagaceae family which consists of 600 species worldwide, including monoecious, deciduous, evergreen trees, and rarely shrubs . These species produce a widely known fruit, commonly identified as acorns, which are of vital importance for both humans and animals. Acorns are a good source of starch, protein, fat, minerals (such as P, K, Ca, and Mg), unsaturated fatty acids (i.e., oleic acid), and vitamins (mostly A and E) [2–8]. In addition, acorns contain numerous biologically active compounds (such as tannins, phenolic acids, and flavonoids), which are essential in the human diet to maintain an adequate level of antioxidants . In particular, acorn can be a major ingredient of gluten-free food products for people with celiac diseases . Recently, acorns have attracted intensive attention as functional food because of their various biological activities, such as antioxidant, anti-inflammation, antibacterial, antitumor, and prevention of degenerative diseases [10–12]. Various food products have been developed from acorn in the light of the abovementioned health impacts. These include bread, pasta, biscuits, hot beverages, cakes, and cookies [9, 13–17]. However, acorn utilization has been mainly limited to traditional uses. The underutilization of acorns in the food industry might be explained by some current consumer trends, but also due to the lack of a number of chemical characterization studies sufficient enough to validate their true potential . There is also the further constraint of their astringency, which, in some cases, might compromise their acceptability as food .
Among all the nutrients, starch is the largest component of acorns (about 55%) (Table 1), providing a potential alternative to traditional starchy raw materials. Acorn starch is rich in resistant starch (RS) fraction (30.8–41.4%) [29, 30]. In recent years, RS has received a lot of attention for both its potential health benefits and functional properties . Recent research has shown that acorn starch can be an ingredient for food and nonfood applications [16, 21, 31]. Compared with other starches from cassava, barley, potato, and wheat, there is a lack of systematic knowledge of acorn starch. This hinders the efficient development of acorn as sustainable crops.
Therefore, the objective of this review is to summarize the present knowledge on the isolation, chemical composition, granular and physicochemical properties, digestibility, modifications, and applications of acorn starches and to provide future research directions.
2. Starch Extraction Methods and Yield
The isolation methods from different reports shared a similar pattern, regardless of the acorn species. Fruits are generally dehulled, chopped, and milled for flour production. The Flour is soaked and wet milled. The chemical or enzyme treatment, screen size, and centrifugal speed have been applied to speed up the isolation of starch from the other compounds such as protein, fat, sugars, and fiber. One of the earliest methods of acorn starch isolation was proposed by  which include a treatment with 0.3% w/v sodium metabisulfite solution for steeping, nylon mesh (106 mm) for screening, and repeated toluene washing (10% toluene in 0.1 M aqueous sodium chloride) for removing protein and lipids. The resulting starch was dried in the air at room temperature. The effects of isolation methods on acorn starch were reported in . The best results in terms of purity, yield, and pasting properties were obtained for two methods that applied low shear with protease digestion and low shear with alkali treatment. Molavi et al.  outlined a process for acorn starch extraction that was based on a method developed by Correia and Beirão-da-Costa . Acorns are dry milled into flour, and the resulting flour is soaked in 0.25% NaOH. After this, suspensions were homogenized and screened through a 180 mm sieve. The precipitate was screened successively in 75 mm and 53 mm sieves and centrifuged. Starch extracted using this process has been shown to have high purity and yield along with a less damaged structure. Li et al.  described a method of isolation of starch from acorn which included steeping of acorn flour in 0.3% sodium hydroxide (1 : 5, w/w), screening of the dispersion through a mesh sieve a 0.18 mm, and then purification by centrifugation. It should be noted that the physicochemical properties of acorn starch are more affected by differences in isolation method and experimental conditions [32–34]. The starch yield was in range of 48.93 to 89.83% [28, 32, 35]. The purity of starch ranged from 98.1% to 97.6% .
3. Molecular Structure
There have been very limited reports on the chemical structures of amylose and amylopectin components from acorn starch. The molecular weight of starch has been shown to range from 2.65 × 107 to 8.22 × 107 g/mol . Furthermore, it was reported that acorn amylopectin molar mass, gyration radius, and density were comparable to other A-type starches . The average branch chain length of amylopectin was DP 25.5. Acorn starch showed a lower percentage of amylopectin (AP) branched short chains (DP 6–12: 28.6%) and very long chain (DP > 37: 2.3%) and a higher percentage of AP branched long chains (DP 13–36: 69.1%) .
4. Chemical Composition
Starch is a mixture of two biopolymers: amylose and amylopectin. The two polysaccharides are homoglycans with only two types of chain linkages, α-(1–4) bonds of the main chain and α-(1–6) bonds in the branching points. The resulting starch showed a wide variation in the chemical composition (Table 1). Amylose content of the acorn starches is reported to vary in the range of approx. 20–39% (Table 1).The difference in amylose contents of acorn starches could be readily attributed to the differences in acorn genetics, growing conditions of the crop, and methods of estimation [20, 36]. The complexes (amylose-lipid complex or amylose-iodine complex) may also hinder actual estimation of amylose content . The moisture content of starch from different acorn sources has been reported in the range of 7.22–15.91 [20, 22, 23]. The moisture content is similar to air-equilibrated cereal starches (10–12%) and some roots and tubers (14–18%) . Minor components of starch such as lipids, proteins, and ash were also reported (Table 1). The protein contents ranged from 0.01 to 6.7% [20, 24, 28], lipid from 0.23 to 2.64% [20, 23], and ash from 0.01 to 1.41% [20, 22–24]. The nitrogen content of acorn starch was 0.04%  and phosphorus-containing compounds were found in a small quantity of 0.01% . Thus, residual lipid content is typically very low in acorn starches and may have a negligible effect on starch functionality.
5. Granular Structure: Morphology, Polymorphism, and Crystallinity
The morphology of acorn starch (Figure 1) has been widely analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Table 2). The morphological features of acorn starch including the size and the shape have been summarized (Table 2). The shape of acorn starch was spherical, elliptical, and irregular. The surfaces of starch extracted from acorn have been reported to be smooth with no fissures, suggesting that the extracted starches are relatively pure [7, 20]. The particle size distribution of acorn starch granules has been also reported in many investigations [7, 20, 23, 25, 28]. Sizes of acorn starch granules (3.3–126.2 μm) were found to be similar to those reported in potato starch (1–110 μm) . The size range of 2–24 μm was the most frequent (Table 2). The variation observed in the shape and size of granules may be due to extraction and purification methods, environmental conditions, growth stage of plant, and genotype. The morphology of acorn starch granules may be better described and quantified by other techniques such atomic force microscopy and laser-light scattering to probe other structural aspects .
In granules, the external chains of amylopectin chains interact with each other and water molecules to form double helices and crystals. The crystals of the granules are arranged systematically to give 3 types of polymorph (A-, B-, and C-types) . The A- and B-type polymorphs are discerned based on the packing arrangement of double helices within amylopectin and their level of hydration . C-type is a mixture of both A- and B-type . The polymorph type of acorn starch has been inconclusive among various reports. Acorn starch was B-type [26, 42]. A-type polymorph was reported for acorn starch [7, 23, 24, 27, 28]. C-type polymorph was also noted [19, 25, 33, 43]. The degree of crystallinity of acorn starch ranged between 22.3 and 47.8% (Table 2). The degree of crystallinity of acorn starch has been reported to be lower than black wheat, buckwheat, coix seed, naked oat, and corn starches and higher than kuzhu, jiaoyu, and longya lily starches . The difference in the diffraction pattern and degree of crystallinity of starch granules was mainly influenced by genotypic, agronomic, and growing conditions (e.g., temperature) [26, 44].
6. Gelatinization Properties
Starch gelatinization is a physical process, in which the granule breaks and swells when heated in the presence of excess water. This process results in a phase transition of starch granules from an ordered state to a disordered state [41, 45]. The gelatinization can be measured by various methods with DSC being most used for acorn starch analysis where onset (To), peak (Tp), conclusion (Tc) temperatures, and enthalpy change (ΔH) are regularly recorded (Table 3). The range of gelatinization temperatures in the literature is shown from 55 to 75.2°C, while the gelatinization enthalpy is found varying from 6.52 to 20.8 J/g [20, 25, 28]. Nevertheless, Soni et al.  revealed that Tp of acorn starches ranged from 80 to 85°C using polarizing microscope. Hence, methods (DSC vs. polarizing microscope) should be taken into consideration when comparing data from different studies. Different DSC studies used different experimental conditions including starch-to-water ratio (1 : 2 to 1 : 3) and scanning rate (1–10 C/min) [19, 20]. These factors may have an impact on the thermal parameters of starch gelatinization. Comparative studies showed that the gelatinization temperatures of acorn starches were lower than those of cassava and corn starches and were high than those of chestnut starches [29, 43]. This differences in gelatinization properties among different starches could be ascribed to the factors like amylose content, crystallinity, and nonstarch content [36, 37]. The impact of the amylopectin chain length in acorn starch on starch gelatinization rests unclear. Therefore, future studies should be conducted to characterize the amylopectin distribution in acorn starch and determine the effect of the chain length distribution of amylopectin on its physicochemical properties.
7. Pasting Properties
Pasting is defined as state which follows gelatinization of starch. The starch paste can be described as a two-phase system consisting of a discontinuous phase of swollen granules and a continuous phase of solubilized amylose and/or amylopectin . The Brabender viscoamylograph (BVA) and rapid viscoanalyzer (RVA) have been widely applied to examine the pasting characteristics of acorn starches (Table 4). The pasting properties are investigated in terms of pasting temperatures and viscosities, which are characterized as peak, breakdown, setback, and final viscosities. The pasting properties of these starches have been determined at different experimental conditions and different concentrations and by employing different instruments. Hence, it is difficult to make a meaningful comparison of the data shown in Table 4. Peak viscosity, breakdown viscosity, setback viscosity, final viscosity, and pasting temperature of different acorn starches have been reported in the ranges of 183–3338 cP, 54–427 cP, 163–1630 cP, 260–3654 cP, and 70–96°C, respectively, as shown in Table 4. The difference in pasting properties of acorn starches is in general attributed to amylose content, amylose leaching, degree of crystallinity, granule size, amylopectin molecular structure, and nonstarch content (e.g., lipids, phosphorus-containing compounds, and proteins) [41, 44]. The pasting properties of starch are also influenced by hydrothermal treatments . The pasting properties of acorn starches have been compared with other starches [26, 28, 29]. The peak viscosity of acorn starch was higher than that of buckwheat, coix seed, black wheat kuzhu, longya lily, and naked oat starches and lower than that of jiaoyu and longya lily starches .The pasting temperature of acorn starch was higher than that of potato but considerably lower than that of corn, rice, and wheat starches .
8. Swelling and Solubility Index
When starch is heated in excessive amount of water, its crystalline structure is disrupted, and water molecules become linked by hydrogen bonding to the exposed hydroxyl groups of amylose and amylopectin, which results in the swelling and solubility of starch granule . The swelling of granules can be measured by swelling power (SP) or swelling factor (SF), while the granular solubilization is described by solubility (%) (S). SF measures only intragranular water. By contrast, SP measures both inter- and intragranular water . Diversity in swelling and solubility of acorn starch has been observed. For example, evaluation of solubility and swelling at temperature 90°C of acorn starches (four varieties) ranged from 4 to 14% and 11 to 13 g/g, respectively . Starch isolation method may have effect on property (SP) and solubility of starch. Acorn starch isolated using the ultrasonic-assisted ethanol soaking (UAES) showed a relatively higher value swelling power and solubility compared with other methods; they were about 24.99 g/100g and 15.22%, respectively, at temperature 90°C . Acorn starch has a low swelling power when compared to potato starch. This may be due to different factors. For example, the high phosphate monoester content in potato starch has been reported to contribute significantly to greater hydration and swelling of potato starch granules . A comparative study showed that swelling power and solubility of acorn starch at 90°C were higher than those of black wheat, buckwheat, coix, and naked oat starches and lower than those of corn, jiaoyu, kuzhu, and longya lily starches . Factors including amylose content, granule size, structure of starch granules, viscosity patterns, and presence of nonstarch compounds (e.g., lipids and proteins) contributed to their differences [45, 46, 51].
9. In Vitro Digestibility
Starch can be conveniently divided into three categories from a digestibility standpoint, depending on its propensity to be hydrolyzed during intestinal transit through digestive enzymes. These are rapidly digestible starch (RDS, hydrolyzed within 20 min), slowly digestible starch (SDS, hydrolyzed between 20 and 120 min), and resistant starch (RS, not hydrolyzed within 120 min) [47, 49]. The variation in the digestibility of native starches among and within species has been ascribed to the interplay of many factors such as degree of crystallinity, starch source, amylose-lipid complexes, amylose content, crystallinity, type of crystalline polymorphic (A, B, or C) form, amylose chain length, starch granule size, and amylose/amylopectin ratio [45, 46]. Diversity in resistant starch (RS) content of acorns has been observed (30.8–41.4%), and the RS content was correlated strongly to isolation method . Furthermore, Lin et al.  reported that hydrolysable tannins could be the main active compounds responsible for decreasing acorn digestibility. The high amount of RS in acorn starch indicates the potential of the acorns for preparation of low glycemic index foods.
10. Modifications and Uses of Starch
Native starch is usually modified to improve functionality and use in the industry . Starch modification may be achieved by physical, enzymatic, genetic, and chemical methods or through a combination of these methods [39, 41]. Physical starch modification methods including annealing and heat moisture treatment (HMT) are considered safe compared to chemical methods. HMT increased starch solubility, gelatinization temperatures, gelatinization enthalpy, peak time, and pasting temperature, making the starch more resistant against destructive conditions such as long heating or acidic conditions. But these changes were lower on ANN . The modification in the physiochemical properties of pulse starches following hydrothermal treatment has been attributed to interplay of several factors including increased interactions between starch chains, amylose content, formation of amylose lipid complexes, and arrangement of amylose within the amorphous domains of starch . Hydrothermal modifications reduced the viscosity of native acorn starch as follows: HMT > HMT-ANN > ANN-HMT > ANN. . Galactomannans (guar and locust bean gum) increased the transition temperatures (To, Tp, and Tc) and decreased the gelatinization enthalpy (DH) . The use of different hydrocolloids (Arabic gum, carrageenan, carboxymethyl cellulose, and xanthan gum) to improve the functionality of acorn starch has also been reported . According to this study, the addition of hydrocolloids significantly increased the flow behavior indices, consistency coefficient, gel strength, and pasting properties.
Zheng et al.  reported that acorn starch (AS) could improve the mechanical and barrier properties of chitosan- (CH-) based film, and the incorporation of eugenol (Eu) in the film significantly improved the flexibility, barrier, hydrophobicity, and antimicrobial and antioxidant properties. The optimized conditions for film preparation were obtained when the mass ratio of AS to CH was 0.9 and the content of Eu was 9% . Furthermore, Li et al.  reported that glycerol-based acorn nutlet/polycaprolactone composites had superior tensile properties and biodegradable properties, sufficient to partially replace the conventional thermoplastic plastics. It was also reported that the composites prepared with acorn powder and PLA had excellent mechanical and thermal properties . These authors reported also that the hygroscopicity, mechanical properties, and melt flow property of composites were promising even though the composites had a 70 wt% content of acorn powder.
Bioethanol production from sugar-based feedstocks promises to be a good replacement of fossil fuel, providing the opportunities for a cleaner and low carbon biofuel . Acorn starch was used as a novel feedstock for direct production bioethanol [56, 57]. Very high gravity (VHG) fermentation technology was conducted to achieve a high ethanol concentration at 86.4 g/L . Acorn starch could be also used as a new raw material for L(+)-lactic acid production , citric acid , and production of hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) .
So far, there have been rather limited studies on the modifications and applications of acorn starch even at the laboratory level. This is probably due to abundant and cheap supply of other starches such as maize, potato, and cassava. Another reason is the limited exploitation of acorn starch for various possible applications. The unique structures and properties of acorn starch may provide potential for diverse applications in some food and nonfood sectors. Comparative studies employing both the acorn starch and common starches (e.g., maize, cassava, and potato) for specific applications (e.g., polymer composite and thermoplastics) should be conducted.
11. Conclusions and Future Perspectives
Acorns are underutilized and represent a good alternative source of starch. The conclusions on acorn starch according to the majority of literature are the following: (1) starch yield is up to ∼55%; (2) amylose content ranges from 15 to 39%; (3) starch granules are most spherical and the size range of 2–24 μm was the most frequent; (4) polymorph of acorn starch has been reported mostly as A- and C-type with some reports as B- type; (5) peak gelatinization temperature measured by DSC ranges from ∼60 to 80°C; and (6) native acorn starch has been used in production of bioethanol, citric acid, and hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) as well as on biofilm production. Furthermore, acorn starch has potentials for preparation of low glycemic index foods, due to its high levels of RS.
In order to better utilize acorn starches, the following points should be addressed: (1) investigations into methods for increasing the yield and purity of acorn starches should be conducted; (2) more genetic resources could be assessed to discover genotypes with novel properties; (3) physicochemical properties of starch such as rheology, retrogradation, gelling, and freeze-thaw stability are to be further characterized; (4) the nonstarch contents (such as phosphorus, lipids, and proteins) of acorn starch should be studied; (5) chemical and molecular structures of amylose and amylopectin should be further studied; (6) the internal molecular structure of acorn starches in relation to physicochemical properties is to be studied; (7) comparative studies employing other starch (e.g., cassava, maize, and potato) as reference should be conducted to explore if there is any advantage of using acorn starches; (8) chemical, physical, and enzymatic modifications or their dual/triple combinations could be applied on acorn starch in the future; and (9) further research on acorn starch should be explored using advanced technologies such as nuclear magnetic resonance, atomic strength microscopy, and other improved characterization techniques.
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Y. R. Tantray, M. S. Wani, and A. Hussain, “Genus Quercus: an overview,” International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, vol. 6, pp. 1880–1886, 2017.View at: Google Scholar
A. F. Vinha, J. C. M. Barreira, A. S. G. Costa, and M. B. P. P. Oliveira, “A new age for Quercus spp. fruits: review on nutritional and phytochemical composition and related biological activities of acorns,” Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 947–981, 2016.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. M. Al-Rousan, R. Y. Ajo, K. M. Al-Ismail, A. Attlee, R. R. Shaker, and T. M. Osaili, “Characterization of acorn fruit oils extracted from selected mediterranean Quercus species,” Grasas y Aceites, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 554–560, 2013.View at: Google Scholar
K. Salajpal, D. Karolyi, M. Dikić, V. Kantura, G. Kiš, and Ž. Sinjer, “Influence of acorn intake on blood lipid profile and longisimus muscle characteristics of black slavonian pig,” Acta Agriculturae Slovenica, vol. 2, pp. 99–105, 2008.View at: Google Scholar
L. Custódio, J. Patarra, F. Alberício, N. d. R. Neng, J. M. F. Nogueira, and A. Romano, “Phenolic composition, antioxidant potential and in vitro inhibitory activity of leaves and acorns of Quercus suber on key enzymes relevant for hyperglycemia and Alzheimer’s disease,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 64, pp. 45–51, 2015.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Cantos, J. C. Espín, C. López-Bote, L. de la Hoz, J. A. Ordóñez, and F. A. Tomás-Barberán, “Phenolic compounds and fatty acids from acorns (Quercus spp.), the main dietary constituent of free-ranged iberian pigs,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 51, no. 21, pp. 6248–6255, 2003.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Korus, D. Gumul, M. Krystyjan, L. Juszczak, and J. Korus, “Evaluation of the quality, nutritional value and antioxidant activity of gluten-free biscuits made from corn-acorn flour or corn-hemp flour composites,” European Food Research and Technology, vol. 243, no. 8, pp. 1429–1438, 2017.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. P. Pereira and L. Oliveira, “Acorn: a fruit with applications in the food industry,” in Proceedings of the XVII Congresso De Nutrição e Alimentação/I Congresso Internacional De Nutrição e Alimentação da APN, Lisbon, Portugal, 2018.View at: Google Scholar
P. R. Correia, M. C. Nunes, and M. L. Beirão-da-Costa, “The effect of starch isolation method on physical and functional properties of Portuguese nut starches. II. Q. rotundifolia lam. and Q. suber lam. acorns starches,” Food Hydrocolloids, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 448–455, 2013.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Boukhelkhal and N. Moulai-Mostefa, “Physicochemical characterization of starch isolated from soft acorns of holm oak (Quercus ilex subsp. ballota (desf.) samp.) grown in Algeria,” Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1995–2005, 2017.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Irinislimane and N. Belhaneche-Bensemra, “Extraction and characterization of starch from oak acorn, sorghum, and potato and adsorption application for removal of maxilon red GRL from wastewater,” Chemical Engineering Communications, vol. 204, no. 8, pp. 897–906, 2017.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. R. Correia, A. S. Leitão, M. L. Beirão-da-Costa et al., “Effect of drying temperatures on chemical and morphological properties of acorn flours,” International Journal of Food Science & Technology, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 1729–1736, 2020.View at: Google Scholar
J. O. Kim and M. J. Lee, “Studies on some physico-chemical properties of the acorn starch,” Korean Journal of Food Science and Technology, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 230–235, 1976.View at: Google Scholar
H. N. Englyst, S. M. Kingman, and J. H. Cummings, “Classification and measurement of nutritionally important starch fractions,” European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 46, pp. S33–S50, 1992.View at: Google Scholar