Journal of Control Science and Engineering

Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 7849841, 9 pages

https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7849841

## Detection of Intermittent Fault for Discrete-Time Systems with Output Dead-Zone: A Variant Tobit Kalman Filtering Approach

Department of Automation, TNList, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Xiao He

Received 10 September 2016; Accepted 9 January 2017; Published 7 February 2017

Academic Editor: William MacKunis

Copyright © 2017 Jie Huang and Xiao He. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

This paper is concerned with the intermittent fault detection problem for a class of discrete-time linear systems with output dead-zone. Dead-zone phenomenon exists in many real practical systems due to the employment of low-cost commercial off-the-shelf sensors. Two Bernoulli random variables are utilized to model the dead-zone effect and a variant formation of Tobit Kalman filter is brought forward to generate a residual that can indicate the occurrence of an intermittent fault. A numerical example is presented to demonstrate the effectiveness and applicability of the proposed technique. The statistical performance of the technique is illustrated as well.

#### 1. Introduction

Due to the uncertainties in the external environment or the abrupt changes in signals, there may exist different kinds of faults yielding unacceptable or intolerable behaviors for the whole system. Since a fault can lead to bad influences or even disastrous consequences on the performance of systems, an accurate fault detection plays a significant role in designing a safe and reliable system. For the past years, many researchers have been investigating this problem and they have established numerous methods, including the model-free fault detection approaches [1–7] and model-based fault detection approaches [8]. Since system mathematical mode indicating evaluation of the system state can be acquired, model-based fault detection approaches occupy an important place in the practical application of diagnosis technology. The mode-based fault detection approaches can be further classified as observer-based approaches [9–13], parity equations approaches [14, 15], and parameter estimation methods [16, 17]. For the model-based approaches, a fault detection observer or filter is designed to detect the fault signal through generating a residual signal and then comparing the residual signal with a threshold [18–20]. The Kalman filter [21] is frequently used for residual signal generation by estimating the states to study the differences between predicted measurements and actual measurements.

At present, most researchers focus on detection of permanent faults and transient faults. Nevertheless, as the electronic technology and computer science have been rapidly developing, a special kind of faults, intermittent faults, comes into sight. Compared with permanent faults, the occurrence of intermittent faults is periodic, intermittent, and recurrent. Differed from transient faults, the intermittent faults can recur in the same component and disappear after changing component. With the cumulative effect, intermittent faults will turn to permanent faults, which are menaces for system performance and equipment safety [22]. There are a few literatures using quantitative analysis methods to investigate the detection problem of intermittent faults. Reference [23] considered the detection of scalar intermittent faults in continuous linear stochastic dynamic systems. Reference [24] looked into the intermittent fault detection problem for networked systems with unknown input and multiple state delays. In [25], a robust fault detection method was proposed to detect intermittent faults for linear stochastic systems in the presence of time-varying parametric perturbations and noises.

In real control systems, especially those making use of low-cost commercial sensors with poor calibration, dead-zone is one of the common sources of measurement nonlinearity. It can seriously limit the performance of systems and bring challenges to engineers. The model of dead-zone with input and output can be described bywhere and are the left and right slopes with and ; and are the left and right break points with and . The researches on the approaches to control the dead-zone can be traced back to Tao and Kokotovic [26] who constructed a continuous-time adaptive dead-zone inverse. Then, they extended it to a discrete-time formulation for linear systems with measurable dead-zone output [27]. After that, [28] presented an asymptotically adaptive elimination of an unknown dead-zone whose input and output are available. Around the beginning of the 21st century, a fuzzy dead-zone precompensator was established in [29] and neural network was applied to the construction of a precompensator in [30].

The Tobit model was first coming forward in [31] as a hybrid of probit analysis and multiple regression for household expenditure with censoring data. Although this model has been widely used in the fields of economics and medicine, it has not been well concerned in control engineering. Reference [32] presented a formulation of Kalman filter, named Tobit Kalman filter, which provided an efficient method to tackle the system with censoring data. In [32], a new definition of innovation was introduced by employing the Tobit regression.

A lot of methods have been proposed for estimation of nonlinear systems with censoring measurements. The extended Kalman filter (EKF) is a commonly used substitution of the Kalman filter when the nonlinear systems are encountered. However, when EKF is not convergent, its performance will deteriorate and become unstable [33]. The unscented Kalman filter (UKF) was devised to be an alternative of the EKF by improving convergence and linearization. Nevertheless, while data are censored, discontinuities will locate between the sigma points resulting in the biased measurement noise covariance [33]. Among those approaches, the particle filter in [34] is accurate but also most computationally expensive. It can cause difficulty in implement of the systems with limitations on computational power, like embedded systems [32]. Another defect is that the posterior weights will go to “collapse” as the particle filter is employed in some very large scale systems [35]. Some methods on fault-tolerant control of systems with dead-zone have been proposed recently [36, 37]. Compared with the aforementioned methods, the Tobit Kalman filter not only has less computational burden, but also has good performance while operating in the nonlinear system, which makes it more practical. This paper considers the fault detection for the discrete-time systems with output dead-zone. Since the dead-zone model does not fall under the category of Tobit model types, the Tobit Kalman filter here is a variant formulation which still maintains the performance of the original one. This variant Tobit Kalman filter will be used for designing the fault detection filter.

So far, there exist fairly rare researches on fault detection, especially the intermittent fault detection, for systems with output dead-zone. This paper has first proposed an intermittent fault detection method for a class of discrete-time systems with output dead-zone via the Tobit Kalman filtering approach, which has less computational expense and higher practicability. Also, the statistical performance will be illustrated in this paper. The remainder of this paper will be divided into five sections. Section 2 states the problem under consideration and the preliminaries of Tobit regression for the data with dead-zone. In Section 3, the variant Tobit Kalman filter will be derived. Section 4 is the part of designing the fault detection filter. Section 5 presents the simulation results and statistical performance. Finally, the conclusion is drawn in Section 6.

#### 2. Problem Formulation and Preliminaries

##### 2.1. Problem Formulation

The discrete-time system with faults to be detected is described aswhere is the state vector; is the latent measurement vector; is the observed measurement vector with a dead-zone; is the fault vector; and represent the Gaussian random vectors with zero mean and covariance and , respectively. The system matrices , , and are constant and deterministic with proper dimensions.

The measurement with dead-zone is to be defined aswhere is a negative vector with elements s, representing the left breakpoint; is a positive vector with elements s, representing the right breakpoint; and are positive constants, representing the left and right slopes, separately. As the statement in [26], the above dead-zone model is a static simplification of different physical phenomena with ignorable fast dynamics.

In order to model the occurrence of dead-zone, two Bernoulli random variables are introduced.

At any time step, the measurement can be expressed as a combination of with probability or . When or , the latent measurements can be observed. When and , the data become latent values. Here, is the index of elements in the measurement vector, where .

It should be noticed that the Bernoulli random matrices should be diagonal; that is, .

Consequently, the measurements can be rewritten as

##### 2.2. Preliminaries

The fault detection filter in this paper is designed by using a variant Tobit Kalman filter. One of the significant points of the Tobit Kalman filter is introducing the innovation through the Tobit regression. As the Tobit regression is used for reference in the design of the fault detection filter with output dead-zone, some preliminaries will be introduced in this section. Notice that all the equations and values are scalars in this section.

Let represent the value of cumulative probability density function of unit-normal distribution at .

Suppose that the values of and the limits , are known, and follows the normal distribution with zero mean and standard deviation, ; then

The cumulative density function of can be obtained according to (6):

The corresponding probability density function iswhere is the value of probability density function at .

The expected value of with a dead-zone is

The variance of with a dead-zone iswhere

#### 3. Variant Tobit Kalman Filter

##### 3.1. Time Update

With the updating of the time indices, the estimation of state before taken into account is expressed aswhere is the estimate of state at time with all the measurements up to time being given.

The state error covariance matrix can be written as where is corresponding state error covariance matrix of and is the true value of the state at time .

##### 3.2. Measurement Update

The stage of measurement update is to rectify the estimate of state using the new information. As all measurements up to time are given, the equation of the state is written as

The state error covariance matrix iswhere is the expectation of measurement at time , whose scalar value can be calculated by (8). In the rest of this paper, will be denoted as for convenience.

The state error covariance matrix can be written by substituting (5) into (15).where

Take the trace of the state error covariance matrix described in (16) and then set the deviation of the trace equal to zero. Then, the optimal Kalman gain can be found so as to minimize the state error covariance.

Substituting (17) into (18) leads to

Since the expected value of a Bernoulli random variable equals success probability, then

In principle, the value of true state should be applied in the calculation. The assumptions in [32] will be used to reduce the constraints.

*Assumption 1 (see [32]). *For small estimation errors, the prediction of state can be used to obtain a sufficiently accurate estimate of the success probability; that is,

*Remark 2. *As Assumption 1 holds true, the state can be considered as independent of the Bernoulli variables and .

*Assumption 3 (see [32]). *In most applications, the matrices are diagonal, which means that the measurement noise is independent in the measurements.

According to the assumptions above, can be written in terms of Assumption 1:Compute by Assumptions 1 and 3.whereSubstituting (27), (28), and (21) into (16) yields

The full view of the variant Tobit Kalman filter iswhere , , , and are defined as (27), (28), (25), and (26), respectively.

#### 4. Fault Detection

In the fault detection, it is expected that the reconstructed process variables derived by the filter will follow the corresponding real values of the fault-free operating states. To get information on whether a fault occurs, the measured variables will be compared with their estimates delivered by the filter. The difference between the measurements and their estimates is defined as a residual. Therefore, a residual generation is the most significant procedure for a successful fault detection [8].

After the estimation of the states, the estimates of outputs are created as shown in

Then, the residual vector is built as the difference between the measurements and their estimates:

The residual evaluation function is used for differentiating the fault from disturbance and uncertainties. This procedure of postprocessing the residuals takes out the information about the fault of interest from the residual signals. After calculating the residual vector, substitute it into the specified evaluation function and compare the evaluation value with the preset threshold. If the residual evaluation value is larger than the threshold, an alarm of fault will be built.

Consider the time-windowed root-mean-square (RMS) norm as the evaluation function:

Then, choose a threshold of the following form:

*Remark 4. *In the practical applications, the threshold is considered as the maximum value of the residual evaluation function in the fault-free case through the Monte Carlo method.

*Remark 5. *Making choice of the threshold should be compromised based on the actual situation. As the value of threshold is increasing, the false alarm rate will reduce whereas the missing alarm rate will rise up. With the decrease of the threshold value, the false alarm rate will go up but the missing alarm rate will be lower. Hence, to choose a threshold needs to consider overall interests.

The relationship between the value of residual evaluation function and the threshold should be satisfied as

The algorithm of the fault detection filter is summarized as follows.

*Algorithm 6 (fault detection using a variant Kalman filter). *The initial conditions and are given.

*Step 1. *Compute and using (12) and (13).

*Step 2. *Compute , , , and using (25), (26), (9), and (10).

*Step 3. *Compute and using (27) and (28).

*Step 4. *Compute using (21).

*Step 5. *Compute and using (14) and (30).

*Step 6. *Compute using (32) and then obtain through (33).

*Step 7. *Evaluate using (34) and then compare it with the threshold using the rule (36).

*Step 8. *Return to Step 1.

#### 5. Simulation Results

In this section, the simulation result will illustrate the applicability of the fault detection filter using the variant Tobit Kalman filtering.

Consider the tracking system of ballistic roll rates explored in [32], which has the dynamic model of (2) with the state-space matrices:

In this example, ; the frequency ; the standard deviation of process noise is ; the variance of measurement noise is .

The dead-zone of measurement is given asthat is, , , , and .

The initial conditions are set as

Then, an intermittent fault is added to the system, which is described as follows:with coefficient matrix

The simulation results are shown in Figures 1, 2, and 3.