Journal of Immunology Research

Journal of Immunology Research / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 325938 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/325938

Ija Talja, Anna-Liisa Kubo, Riitta Veijola, Mikael Knip, Olli Simell, Jorma Ilonen, Mari Vähä-Mäkilä, Epp Sepp, Marika Mikelsaar, Meeme Utt, Raivo Uibo, "Antibodies to Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria in Young Children with Different Propensity to Develop Islet Autoimmunity", Journal of Immunology Research, vol. 2014, Article ID 325938, 6 pages, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/325938

Antibodies to Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria in Young Children with Different Propensity to Develop Islet Autoimmunity

Academic Editor: Jacek Tabarkiewicz
Received18 Nov 2013
Revised16 Jan 2014
Accepted20 Jan 2014
Published04 Mar 2014

Abstract

The intestinal microbiota is essential to the maturation and homeostasis of the immune system. Immunoblot assays were used to establish the prevalence of serum IgG, IgM, and IgA antibodies specific for Bifidobacterium adolescentis, Bifidobacterium longum, and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG proteins in young children presenting with or without type 1 diabetes (T1D). We demonstrated that children between the ages of 6 and 12 months had a substantial increase in the frequency of IgG antibodies specific for L. rhamnosus GG proteins. We measured IgG, IgM, and IgA class antibody reactivity against B. adolescentis DSM 20083, B. adolescentis DSM 20086, and B. longum DSM 20088 proteins demonstrating significantly higher IgA responses against B. adolescentis DSM 20083 strain proteins in children who developed islet autoimmunity and T1D later in life. B. adolescentis strains showed more IgM type antibodies in children who developed T1D later in life, but the difference was not statistically significant. B. longum proteins were recognized by IgG and IgA antibodies to a higher extent compared to other bacteria studied. These results confirm that differences in immune reactivity against some commensal strains in young children may represent a different risk factor for developing T1D.

1. Introduction

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is characterized by immune-mediated destruction of the insulin-secreting β cells in the pancreatic islets as a result of an unknown trigger mechanism. It is, however, well known that development of clinical disease is preceded by an asymptomatic latent period during which immune reactions against the insulin-secreting cell autoantigens can be demonstrated [13]. In this context, biochemically detectable autoantibodies against insulin (IAA), glutamic acid decarboxylase (GADA), insulinoma-associated antigen 2 (IA-2A), and Zn-transporter 8 (ZnT8A) as well as their counterpart immunofluorescent anti-islet antibodies (ICA) serve as reliable biomarkers for T1D development. Specifically, Knip et al. [3] demonstrated that all children initially testing positive for both GADA and IA-2A progressed to clinical T1D over a 26-year followup.

Over the last few decades the incidence of T1D has dramatically increased in many countries particularly in early childhood, suggesting that an event associated with progression towards T1D disease was occurring early in life. An increasing number of studies have suggested that the composition of the intestinal microbiota might contribute significantly to the development of disorders such as T1D since changes to the microflora mirror changes in general life styles and the social system [46].

It is believed that intestinal colonization with certain bacteria strongly influences systemic immune responses early in life and may play a significant role in modulating the development of various chronic diseases [7]. Some of the most common constituents of the gastrointestinal tract microbiota include Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus species that have been shown to play a significant role in the development of immune-mediated disorders in humans [811]. That is, predominant colonization with B. adolescentis has been reported in patients with allergic disorders compared to colonization patterns observed in individuals with nonallergic disorders [1214]. Other Bifidobacterium species have been shown to have diverse effects, including variable associations of B. longum with immune-mediated and inflammatory diseases. Studies of rodent disease models [15, 16] have also identified differences in the ability of different Bifidobacterium species in modulating immune reactivity and inflammation. These observations are in line with study results showing that different Lactobacillus spp. may have diverse immunomodulating effects on different diseases [17]. Most well known are the effects of the probiotic strain L. rhamnosus GG in preventing atopic eczema among infants, possibly by modulating the immune response to allergens [18]. The recent identification of the L. rhamnosus GG p40 molecule as an immunomodulator [19] represents a significant step forward towards resolving problems related to the effects of probiotics in vivo.

Previously we demonstrated that the elicitation of antibodies against L. acidophilus antigenic components differed between children with various chronic diseases [20]. The current study describes experiments designed to extend these observations by investigating the prevalence of serum antibodies against B. adolescentis, B. longum, and L. rhamnosus GG in young children that developed or did not develop T1D.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Plasma Samples

Plasma samples () from 38 children participating in the Finnish Type 1 Diabetes Prediction and Prevention (DIPP) study and born between 1995 and 2003 were included in this study. Children were separated into 2 groups of 19 children (11 females) each matched for age and sex. One group was comprised of children who later developed at least 2 T1D-related autoantibodies and subsequently clinical T1D (islet autoimmunity [IA], i.e., the IA-positive group) and the other group was comprised of children that did not develop or present with signs of islet autoimmunity (IA-negative group) and without T1D during followup. Islet autoimmunity was defined in this context as detection of at least 2 antibodies out of GADA (assay sensitivity 82%, specificity 96%), IA-2A (assay sensitivity 72%, specificity 100%), and/or ICA. Levels of ICA were measured by an indirect immunofluorescence assay with a detection limit of 2.5 Juvenile Diabetes Foundation Units. All children in the IA-positive group later developed T1D (age at onset ranged between 2.4 and 10.3 years). Both groups were similar in their documented use of antibiotics (during the first 2 years of life 13/18 IA-positive children and 17/18 IA-negative children were treated with antibiotics; ; the data pertaining to one child from each group was not available). No differences in the use of probiotics between groups were observed (2 children from the IA-positive group; ).

2.2. Bacterial Strains and Cell Lysate Preparation

Wilkins-Chalgren agar (Oxoid, UK) was used to culture B. adolescentis DSM 20083 (ATCC 15703) and DSM 20086 (ATCC 15705) and B. longum DSM 20088 (ATCC 15697). Man-Rogosa-Sharpe agar (Oxoid, UK) was used to culture L. rhamnosus GG. Wilkins-Chalgren agar plates were incubated in an anaerobic cabinet (Concept, UK; with gas mixture of 5% CO2, 5% H2, and 90% N2) and Man-Rogosa-Sharpe agar in a microaerobic environment (Joan, France) with a gas mixture of 10% CO2 for 48 h.

Bacterial cells were collected, suspended in phosphate-buffered saline solution (PBS, pH = 7.4), and washed 3 times with the same buffer. Subsequently, cells were disrupted with 0.1 mm glass beads (Biospec Products, USA) in PBS in the presence of complete protease inhibitors (Boehringen Mannheim-Roche, Switzerland) on ice. The total protein concentration in lysates was determined using the Protein Assay solution (Bio-Rad, USA) using bovine serum albumin as a standard and kept in aliquots at −20°C until used.

2.3. Gradient Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and 1D Immunoblotting

Equal amounts of proteins from different Bifidobacteria spp. preparations were mixed with 300 μL SDS-PAGE sample buffer and heated for 15 min at 95°C. To each gel approximately 100 μg of protein was loaded.

The proteins in the bacterial cell lysate were loaded on a 5–20% gradient gel with a 5% concentrating gel with All Blue 10–250 kDa molecular weight (MW) markers (Bio-Rad, USA) as standards and separated by electrophoresis using a current of 40 mA and a voltage of 200 V for 6 h using a vertical electrophoresis system SE-600 (Hoefer, USA) connected to a thermostatic circulator. Separated proteins were transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (0.45 μm pore size) using a semidry electroblotter (Hoefer, USA) at a current density of 1 mA/cm2 for 1.5 h and membranes blocked as described by Nilsson et al. [21].

Five mm wide strips were cut from the membrane and incubated with plasma samples diluted to 1 : 50 for IgA and IgM and 1 : 100 for IgG in the incubating buffer [21] overnight at 4°C. Strips were then incubated with either secondary anti-human IgA, anti-human IgM, or anti-human IgG antibodies labelled with horse-radish peroxidase (HRP) (diluted 1 : 500; Dako, Denmark) for 1 h and subsequently developed in substrate solution comprised of 0.04% carbazole in 50 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH = 5.0) and hydrogen peroxide (0.015%) for 30 min at room temperature. All serum samples were screened in similar fashion. The strips were scanned using a Bio-Rad GS-710 Imaging densitometer (Bio-Rad, USA). The relative MW of the bands was estimated with the Bio-Rad Quantity One image analysis software (Bio-Rad, USA) according to the All Blue molecular weight markers.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The F-test was used to compare the frequency of antibodies in the two groups. values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. IgG Antibody Reactivity to L. rhamnosus GG Proteins

We first analyzed the dynamics of IgG antibodies that developed against L. rhamnosus GG target antigens in children between 3 and 24 months of age. This approach was chosen due to the frequent consumption of the probiotic L. rhamnosus GG-containing dairy products by children and adults in Finland. We discovered 25 clearly distinguishable L. rhamnosus GG antigenic proteins ranging between 11 and 86 kDa (Table 1). The number of L. rhamnosus GG proteins recognized by IgG increased steadily with age. Table 2 describes the 9 most frequently reactive proteins. Children between the ages of 12 and 24 months presented with significantly more antibodies against 5/9 (31, 42, 45, 47, and 49 kDa proteins) selected highly reactive proteins compared to reactivity observed in 3-month-old infants. However, no significant differences in IgG reactivity were observed in response to L. rhamnosus GG antigens between IA-positive and IA-negative children.


Antigenic protein MW rangesNumber of reactive antigenic proteins
IgGIgAIgGIgA

L. rhamnosus GG11–86 kDan.t.*25n.t.*
B. adolescentis DSM 200837–80 kDa7–72 kDa3120
B. adolescentis DSM 2008610–131 kDa10–92 kDa3624
B. longum DSM 2008810–127 kDa10–104 kDa5744

 *n.t.: not tested.

L. rhamnosus GG antigenic proteins3-month6-month12-month24-month
IA-positiveIA-negativeIA-positiveIA-negativeIA-positiveIA-negativeIA-positiveIA-negative
( ) ( )( )( )( )( )( )( )

65 kDa 8 (44) 14 (78)14 (74) * 17 (89)17 (94) 17 (94) 15 (100)17 (94)
58 kDa 8 (44)12 (67)18 (95) 19 (100) 17 (94)17 (94)15 (100)18 (100)
49 kDa 2 (11)2 (11)2 (10)4 (21)6 (33)8 (44)4 (27) 7 (39)
47 kDa 4 (22)4 (22)8 (42)7 (37)9 (50)12 (67)7 (47)8 (44)
45 kDa 9 (50)11 (61)11 (58) 11 (58) 16 (89)14 (78)15 (100)18 (100)
42 kDa 3 (17)4 (22)5 (26)7 (37)9 (50)7 (39)8 (53)9 (50)
38 kDa 1 (5)3 (17)2 (10) 2 (10) 5 (28)5 (28)8 (53)8 (44)
31 kDa 13 (72)9 (50)14 (74)11 (58) 17 (94)17 (94)15 (100)16 (89)
27 kDa 0 (0)4 (22)1 (5)2 (10) 2 (11) 2 (11) 5 (33)6 (33)

 *Number and % (in brackets) of children with positive reactions to this protein.

The average number of IgG-reactive L. rhamnosus GG protein bands was in IA-positive infants (between 5 and 17 bands) and in IA-negative children (between 5 and 20 bands) at 12 months of age. Based on these results the 12-month-old group was chosen for further analysis of immune reactivity against Bifidobacterium spp. antigens.

3.2. IgG Reactivity against B. adolescentis and B. longum Proteins

IgG bound to Bifidobacterium antigens in the molecular weight ranging from 7 kDa to 131 kDa. The number of proteins recognized varied between strains with the greatest number of reactive antigens observed for B. longum DSM 20088 (; Table 1). The average number of IgG-reactive proteins in assays with B. adolescentis DSM 20083, B. adolescentis DSM 20086, and B. longum DSM 20088 strains was not significantly different between IA-positive children and IA-negative subjects (Figures 13).

3.3. IgA Reactivity against B. adolescentis and B. longum Proteins

IgA bound to protein antigens in the molecular weight ranging from 7 kDa to 104 kDa (Table 1). Similar to the IgG antibody results, more B. longum DSM 20088 proteins were recognized by IgA than any other tested bacteria. The average number of B. adolescentis DSM 20083 proteins bound by IgA was lower than the number of proteins bound from other strains. There was a significant difference in the number of proteins reactive to antibodies between the 2 groups of children: reactive protein bands in IA-positive infants and reactive protein bands in IA-negative children (; Figure 1). Also in tests with Bifidobacterium strains the average number of reacting antigenic proteins tended to be at a higher frequency in the IA-positive group compared to the IA-negative group (Figures 2 and 3).

3.4. IgM Reactivity to B. adolescentis Proteins

IgM bound to bacterial proteins in the molecular weight ranging from 13 kDa to 84 kDa. The average number of IgM reacting protein bands in both assays either with B. adolescentis DSM 20083 or with B. adolescentis DSM 20086 was higher in IA-positive than in IA-negative infants, but this difference was not statistically significant ( and , resp.; Figures 1 and 2).

4. Discussion

This study investigated the reactivity of serum antibodies against the probiotic strain L. rhamnosus GG and selected natural Bifidobacterium spp. proteins in children 3, 6, 12, and 24 months of age using an immunoblot assay developed previously by our group [20]. L. rhamnosus GG is included into the most commonly used dairy products in Finland, whereas all chosen Bifidobacterium strains, B. adolescentis DSM 20083, B. adolescentis DSM 20086, and B. longum DSM 20088, are usual inhabitants of the intestinal microbiota. The colonization of newborns with microbes begins during delivery and by 2 months of age 91% of infants are colonized with B. longum, 75% with B. adolescentis, and 57% with Lactobacilli group I (L. rhamnosus, L. casei, and L. paracasei) [10]. A shift in colonization with B. adolescentis strains towards earlier life has been demonstrated recently [14] and this has also been observed at the age of 5 years [13].

The population studied here was obtained from the Finnish DIPP Study and divided into 2 groups based on the development of diabetes-associated autoantibodies and T1D over a 10-year followup. Immunoblot analyses of bacterial lysates demonstrated a substantial increase in the frequency of IgG antibody reactivity to L. rhamnosus GG proteins between 6 and 12 months of age, showing that the most conspicuous increase in antibody production occurred before the age of 12 months. In spite of these age-dependent changes, reactions against L. rhamnosus GG proteins were seen in IA-positive and IA-negative subjects at a similar frequency. This result indicated that IgG antibodies reactive to probiotic strain L. rhamnosus GG proteins were not suggestive of progression toward β-cell autoimmunity or development of T1D in children. The most important observation made from immunoblot assays testing antibody reactivity to L. rhamnosus GG proteins was the age-related dynamics associated with the development of circulating antibodies to microbial proteins. This emphasized how important it was to carry out these analyses using Bifidobacterium spp. proteins since these organisms are known to colonize the infant’s gut early in life. We assessed binding to different antigenic proteins from B. adolescentis DSM 20083, B. adolescentis DSM 20086, and B. longum DSM 20088 by IgG, IgA, and IgM class antibodies and observed that IgA bound significantly more B. adolescentis DSM 20083 strain antigens in children who developed islet autoimmunity and T1D later in life. At the same time we could not find any significant differences between the two groups of children in the frequencies of IgG or IgA antibodies against other bifidobacteria strains. It is noteworthy that we found that B. longum proteins were recognized by IgG and IgA antibodies to a substantially higher extent compared to other bacteria studied. This phenomenon may indicate a stronger stimulation of the infant’s immune system by B. longum protein antigens.

Some of the immunoreactive bands detected may be due to cross-reactive antibodies that developed in response to bacterial antigens from species not used in this study. It is however very difficult to make this distinction since we presently have no tools (monoclonal antibodies) to discriminate between strain-specific reactivity and cross-reactivity. Regardless, it was clear that differences in the development of IgA antibodies with reactivity against B. adolescentis DSM 20083 (ATCC 15703) antigens were present independent of the mechanism involved. It is of particular importance to note that differences between the 2 groups were associated with reactivity by IgA but not IgG or IgM class antibodies. IgA with reactivity against commensal intestinal microbes can develop as a consequence of colonization with high numbers of organisms at the mucosal surface [22]. It has been shown that oral administration of the probiotic mixture VSL#3 that includes 8 different probiotic strains (including 3 bifidobacteria strains) prevented the development of autoimmune diabetes in nonobese diabetic mice [23]. Different bifidobacteria strains have clearly been shown to have variable influences on immune responses [23, 24]. The species of B. adolescentis most commonly isolated from allergic children has been shown to more effectively trigger the production of proinflammatory cytokines compared to other strains of bifidobacteria [25, 26] supporting our results that demonstrated differences between children with and without signs of β-cell autoimmunity with regard to reactivity to B. adolescentis strain 20083 antigens which might impact T1D development. Whether these differences are in some way linked to differences in the microbiome needs further studies [27, 28].

In conclusion, during the first year of life the immune system starts to produce antibodies which recognize antigens produced by organisms comprising the normal microbiota. Although some of these proteins may contain common antigenic epitopes present on proteins produced by various bacteria, our current study showed that differences in antibody reactivities could be found even between the same species of B. adolescentis. These differences might reflect a propensity for developing T1D confirming recent findings regarding differences in the gut microbiome between children affected and unaffected by T1D. Further studies will be needed to verify how the presence of this particular B. adolescentis DSM 20083 strain in the intestine of children is involved in predisposing individuals to developing β-cell autoimmunity and T1D.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Grants from Estonian Ministry of Education and Research (SF0180035 and SF0180132) and the Sigrid Juselius Foundation. The DIPP study was supported by Special Public Grants for Medical Research at Oulu, Tampere, and Turku University Hospitals, the Academy of Finland, the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation International, the Novo-Nordisk Foundation, and European Union Biomed 2. European Union Regional Developmental Fund’s support to the Centre for Translational Medicine at the University of Tartu is gratefully appreciated.

References

  1. C. Taplin and J. Barker, “Autoantibodies in type 1 diabetes,” Autoimmunity, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 11–18, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. K. Vehik, M. J. Haller, C. A. Beam et al., “Islet autoantibody seroconversion in the DPT-1 study: justification for repeat screening throughout childhood,” Diabetes Care, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 358–362, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. M. Knip, S. Korhonen, P. Kulmala et al., “Prediction of type 1 diabetes in the general population,” Diabetes Care, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1206–1212, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. K. Salminen, K. Sadeharju, M. Lönnrot et al., “Enterovirus infections are associated with the induction of β-cell autoimmunity in a prospective birth cohort study,” Journal of Medical Virology, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 91–98, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. Wahlberg, J. Fredriksson, E. Nikolic et al., “Environmental factors related to the induction of beta-cell autoantibodies in 1-yr-old healthy children,” Pediatric Diabetes, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 199–205, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. A. T. Borchers, R. Uibo, and M. E. Gershwin, “The geoepidemiology of type 1 diabetes,” Autoimmunity Reviews, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. A355–A365, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. E. J. Schiffrin and S. Blum, “Interactions between the micrbiota and the intestinal mucosa,” European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 56, pp. 560–564, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  8. F. He, A. C. Ouwehand, E. Isolauri, H. Hashimoto, Y. Benno, and S. Salminen, “Comparison of mucosal adhesion and species identification of bifidobacteria isolated from healthy and allergic infants,” FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 43–47, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. E. Furrie, “Probiotics and allergy,” Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 465–469, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. Y. M. Sjögren, S. Tomicic, A. Lundberg et al., “Influence of early gut microbiota on the maturation of childhood mucosal and systemic immune responses: gut microbiota and immune responses,” Clinical and Experimental Allergy, vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 1842–1851, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. G. Hörmannsperger and D. Haller, “Molecular crosstalk of probiotic bacteria with the intestinal immune system: clinical relevance in the context of inflammatory bowel disease,” International Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 300, no. 1, pp. 63–73, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. A. C. Ouwehand, E. Isolauri, F. He, H. Hashimoto, Y. Benno, and S. Salminen, “Differences in Bifidobacterium flora composition in allergic and healthy infants,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 144–145, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  13. J. Štšepetova, E. Sepp, K. Julge, E. Vaughan, M. Mikelsaar, and W. M. De Vos, “Molecularly assessed shifts of Bifidobacterium ssp. and less diverse microbial communities are characteristic of 5-year-old allergic children,” FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 260–269, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. Y. M. Sjögren, M. C. Jenmalm, M. F. Böttcher, B. Björkstén, and E. Sverremark-Ekström, “Altered early infant gut microbiota in children developing allergy up to 5 years of age,” Clinical and Experimental Allergy, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 518–526, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. N. Takahashi, H. Kitazawa, N. Iwabuchi et al., “Immunostimulatory oligodeoxynucleotide from Bifidobacterium longum suppresses Th2 immune responses in a murine model,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 145, no. 1, pp. 130–138, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. Medina, E. Izquierdo, S. Ennahar, and Y. Sanz, “Differential immunomodulatory properties of Bifidobacterium logum strains: relevance to probiotic selection and clinical applications,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 150, no. 3, pp. 531–538, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. A. L. Hart, K. Lammers, P. Brigidi et al., “Modulation of human dendritic cell phenotype and function by probiotic bacteria,” Gut, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 1602–1609, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. Kalliomäki, S. Salminen, H. Arvilommi, P. Kero, P. Koskinen, and E. Isolauri, “Probiotics in primary prevention of atopic disease: a randomised placebo-controlled trial,” Lancet, vol. 357, no. 9262, pp. 1076–1079, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. F. Yan, H. Cao, T. L. Cover et al., “Colon-specific delivery of a probiotic-derived soluble protein ameliorates intestinal inflammation in mice through an EGFR-dependent mechanism,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 121, no. 6, pp. 2242–2253, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. A.-L. Prangli, M. Utt, I. Talja et al., “Antigenic proteins of Lactobacillus acidophilus that are recognised by serum IgG antibodies in children with type 1 diabetes and coeliac disease,” Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. e772–e779, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  21. I. Nilsson, I. Kornilovs'ka, S. Lindgren, Å. Ljungh, and T. Wadström, “Increased prevalence of seropositivity for non-gastric Helicobacter species in patients with autoimmune liver disease,” Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 949–953, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. A. J. Macpherson, M. B. Geuking, E. Slack, S. Hapfelmeier, and K. D. McCoy, “The habitat, double life, citizenship, and forgetfulness of IgA,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 245, no. 1, pp. 132–146, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. A. Aumeunier, F. Grela, A. Ramadan et al., “Systemic toll-like receptor stimulation suppresses experimental allergic asthma and autoimmune diabetes in NOD mice,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 7, Article ID e11484, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. P. López, M. Gueimonde, A. Margolles, and A. Suárez, “Distinct Bifidobacterium strains drive different immune responses in vitro,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 138, no. 1-2, pp. 157–165, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. D. R. Kramer, R. M. Sutherland, S. Bao, and A. J. Husband, “Cytokine mediated effects in mucosal immunity,” Immunology and Cell Biology, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 389–396, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  26. F. He, H. Morita, H. Hashimoto et al., “Intestinal Bifidobacterium species induce varying cytokine production,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 109, no. 6, pp. 1035–1036, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. A. Giongo, K. A. Gano, D. B. Crabb et al., “Toward defining the autoimmune microbiome for type 1 diabetes,” ISME Journal, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 82–91, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. C. T. Brown, A. G. Davis-Richardson, A. Giongo et al., “Gut microbiome metagenomics analysis suggests a functional model for the development of autoimmunity for type 1 diabetes,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 10, Article ID e25792, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Ija Talja et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

2172 Views | 619 Downloads | 7 Citations
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.