Journal of Immunology Research

Journal of Immunology Research / 2015 / Article
Special Issue

Cellular Immunity-Pathogen Interactions in Infectious Diseases

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 178947 | 7 pages |

Immune Evasion Strategies of Trypanosoma cruzi

Academic Editor: Oguz Kul
Received24 Nov 2014
Accepted31 Dec 2014
Published09 Jul 2015


Microbes have evolved a diverse range of strategies to subvert the host immune system. The protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, the causative agent of Chagas disease, provides a good example of such adaptations. This parasite targets a broad spectrum of host tissues including both peripheral and central lymphoid tissues. Rapid colonization of the host gives rise to a systemic acute response which the parasite must overcome. The parasite in fact undermines both innate and adaptive immunity. It interferes with the antigen presenting function of dendritic cells via an action on host sialic acid-binding Ig-like lectin receptors. These receptors also induce suppression of CD4+ T cells responses, and we presented evidence that the sialylation of parasite-derived mucins is required for the inhibitory effects on CD4 T cells. In this review we highlight the major mechanisms used by Trypanosoma cruzi to overcome host immunity and discuss the role of parasite colonization of the central thymic lymphoid tissue in chronic disease.

1. Introduction

Trypanosoma cruzi (T. cruzi) is a protozoan parasite that causes Chagas disease, which affects nearly 20 million people in the Americas [1, 2]. The disease progresses to a symptomatic chronic phase in which about 30% of patients develop cardiomyopathy or neuropathies and dilatations of the colon or esophagus at some time during their lifetimes [3]. Distinct hypotheses have been considered for the pathogenesis of Chagas disease, including autoimmune effects and parasite-driven tissue damage [46]. T. cruzi is a hemoflagellate parasite with a complex life cycle in which it enters vertebrates through the bite of a haematophagous triatomine (reduviid) insect. The life cycle has distinct stages involving epimastigotes and metacyclic trypomastigotes in the insect vector and blood-form trypomastigotes and intracellular amastigotes in vertebrate hosts [7]. In vertebrates, the parasite confronts a sophisticated immune system involving circulating cells and molecules as well as specialized tissues and organs [812].

To overcome host immunity, the trypanosome has an arsenal of evasion strategies linked to alternation between intracellular proliferative forms and nonproliferative, infective extracellular trypomastigotes. The different morphological life cycle forms are associated with adaptive changes in gene expression [13]. Genomic analysis has predicted the protein-coding sequences of T. cruzi and has annotated gene clusters/virulence factors implicated in evading host cell immunity. These factors are responsible for the wide range of host cells targeted by the parasite, mainly nonphagocytic cells [14]. Immune evasion by T. cruzi relies primarily on subverting the complement system and inhibitory effects on the mononuclear phagocyte system [15, 16].

Downregulation of phagocytic activity is also seen in other protozoan infections such as leishmaniasis and African trypanosomiasis, pointing to evolutionary convergence in the phylogeny of the protozoan parasites [1719]. However, in contrast to other protozoan parasites that inhibit the maturation of phagolysosomes, T. cruzi evades macrophage microbicidal activity by escaping from the phagolysosome to the host cell cytoplasm where it replicates [20]. Moreover, it also interferes with the transcription of cytokines secreted by infected macrophages [21]. TLR activation by the parasite is weak and a major parasite cysteine-protease prevents macrophage activation by blocking the NF-κB P65 pathway and shutting down the express ion of the proinflammatory cytokine, IL-12 [22]. In this scenario, the infection of macrophages favors the secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10 and TGF-β that impair the development of protective immune responses and favor the spread of infection [23, 24].

However, there are a variety of natural strains of T. cruzi and it appears that their immune modulatory effects are strain-dependent, a feature that may influence parasite-host interactions [25]. Phylogenetic reconstructions by comparative analysis of the RNA sequences of the various strains suggest that they diverged about 100 million years ago [26]. The different strains coexist dynamically in natural reservoirs. In fact, different combinations of T. cruzi strains have been found in the triatomine bugs from domestic and peridomestic areas [27]. Moreover, immune evasion may occur at the population level rather than at the level of a single strain. The CD8+ T cell immunodominant epitopes encoded by the large trans-sialidase family of genes vary depending on the parasite strain [28]. As CD8+ T cells are crucial for controlling the intracellular parasite, the T cell-mediated cytotoxic mechanisms that prevent parasite growth inside the host also vary.

2. Parasite-Associated Acute Phase Virulence Factors Can Overcome the Host Resistance Mechanisms and Establish Persistent Infections

The acute phase of Chagas disease is characterized by strong inhibition of the host immune response by the T. cruzi virulence factors, which are crucial for creating a persistent infection and establishing the chronic disease [5, 29, 30]. In both humans and experimental models, the acute phase is marked by a state of immunosuppression [5, 3139] involving, among other things, the induction of anergy and clonal deletion in the T cell compartment, together with strong polyclonal B cell stimulation which ultimately restricts the development of antigen-specific lymphocytes [40, 41].

In fact T. cruzi provides a striking example of an immunosuppression strategy: thus, T cells from infected mice respond poorly to mitogens [33, 34, 37] and they also undergo enhanced apoptosis when the T cell receptor (TCR) is activated, hence increasing the unresponsiveness of host immunity [4244]. T. cruzi membrane glycoproteins are critical for damping host protective immunity. The parasite surface is covered by mucin-like molecules with, attached to their terminal β-galactosyl residues, sialic acid residues which are transferred from host glycoconjugates by the parasite trans-sialidase [4548]. These T. cruzi mucins are O-glycosylated Thr/Ser/Pro-rich proteins; they are the predominant glycoproteins on the parasite surface and are encoded by more than 800 genes comprising approximately 1% of the parasite genome [4951].

The T. cruzi mucin-like molecules are key players in the host-parasite interplay, including invasion of the host and subversion of its immune system. Their sialylated forms are able to protect parasite antigenic determinants from host attack mediated by anti-galactosyl antibodies and complement factor B [5255]. They also impair host dendritic cell function as demonstrated by inhibition of the production of IL-12 [56]. This inhibition may occur at the transcriptional level, since the T. cruzi-derived mucins are able to inhibit transcription of the IL-2 gene in T cells [33, 34], which also occurs when T cell activation and proliferation are blocked in response to mitogens and antigens [57]. The parasite sialoglycoproteins also inhibit early events in T cell activation, in particular tyrosine phosphorylation of the adapter protein SLP-76 and the tyrosine kinase ZAP-70 [37].

We have recently examined the inhibitory effects of the T. cruzi mucins in vivo. After exposure to these mucins during experimental infection in a murine model of Chagas disease, the mice displayed increased susceptibility to infection, with enhanced parasitemia and heart damage. These effects were associated with a reduction in IFN-γ-producing CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses, together with decreased levels of both splenic IFN-γ and TNF-α [57]. With regard to the molecular mechanisms underlying these effects it has been shown that parasite-derived mucins bind to the mammalian acid-binding Tg-like lectin, Siglec-E (CD33) [58, 59], and our data suggest that binding of Siglec-E by T. cruzi mucins inhibits mitogenic responses in CD4+ T cells. We showed that the impairment of TCR/CD3-mediated activation of CD4+ T cells was correlated with arrest in the G1/S transition of the cell cycle and that interaction of the terminal sialyl residues of the T. cruzi mucins with CD4+ T cells led to the induction of p27/Kip1, a cell cycle regulator that blocks the transition from G1 to S phase of the cell cycle [57].

The limited T cell responses contrast with the extensive polyclonal expansion of B cell lymphocytes in the acute phase of Chagas disease [41]. During infection an increased frequency of IgG2a- and IgG2b-secreting B cells can be observed in peripheral lymphoid organs. The majority of these cells are nonspecific and secrete antibodies with low affinity for T. cruzi antigens [60]; some cross-react with heart and neural tissue [6163]. These autoantibodies are believed to play secondary roles in the pathogenesis of Chagas disease; they do not induce autoimmune effects because negative selection in the thymus during the process of central tolerance creates a peripheral lymphocyte repertoire with low affinity for cross-reacting autoantigens [6466].

However, the polyclonal activation of the B cell compartment could restrict the size of the niche needed for optimal development of antigen-specific lymphocytes involved in protective responses to the infection by increasing competition for activation and survival signals in the lymphoid tissues [67, 68]. This phenomenon could have a role in the immunosuppression seen in both mice and humans in the acute phase of Chagas disease [5, 3239]. Alteration of the homeostasis of the B cell compartment by the parasite has been attributed, at least in part, to parasite-derived glycoinositolphospholipids (GIPLs) [69], which are components of the dense glycolipid layer covering the parasite cell surface [70]. These GIPLs act as virulence factors that function as TLR4 agonists with proinflammatory effect [71]. There is also evidence that the proline racemase encoded by T. cruzi, which participates in arginine and proline metabolism, functions as a potent mitogen for B cells and may therefore play a role in immune evasion by the parasite and its persistence in the vertebrate host [72, 73].

3. The Impact of Central Tolerance of Parasite-Specific T Cells Targeting the Thymus on Persistent Infection in Chronic Chagas Disease

Pathogens are able to interfere with vertebrate homeostasis at several levels. One important level involves the intersection between the three regulatory systems, neural, endocrine, and immune. These physiological networks can work together to recognize the danger of pathogen invasion. In most vertebrates threatened by a pathogen, acute short-term stress signals induce host responses that enhance innate defense mechanism [74]. A race between the pathogen-mediated evasion mechanisms and host immune responses then determines whether the invader will be rapidly eliminated or establish a persistent infection. In the latter case, the stress signals continue to suppress the host immune response, a scenario that favors the infection. It has been shown, for instance, that chronic stress causes a shift from T helper 1-mediated cellular immunity towards T helper 2-mediated humoral immunity, and this can influence the course of an infection and the susceptibility of the host to intracellular pathogens [75].

In infections caused by T. cruzi, TNF-α induces an inflammatory syndrome during the acute phase which activates the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis leading to release of corticosterone. This stress hormone affects the disease outcome by its effect on the host immune system [76, 77]. Endogenous glucocorticoids also have an impact on the thymus, the central lymphoid organ controlling the continuous formation of T cells which are released to the periphery to form the host immunological repertoire [78]. The complex developmental processes in the thymus depend on direct contact between stromal cells and the thymocytes undergoing maturation, and disturbance of the thymic microenvironment can affect the T cell repertoire and thus the adaptive immune response [79].

Alterations of the thymic environment occur in infections involving many distinct pathogens (bacteria, viruses, parasites, and fungi) [8088]. In most cases, disruption of thymic homeostasis can cause atrophy of the organ due to the apoptotic death of thymocytes [79]. This is the case in experimental models of T. cruzi infection, in which an imbalance between intrathymic and systemic stress-related endocrine circuits gives rise to high levels of intrathymic glucocorticoid hormones that mainly affect the viability of CD4+CD8+ thymocytes, but the populations of other subtypes such as double-negative (DN) T cells and SP cells are also reduced [76, 89]. This death mechanism is associated with the activation of thymocyte caspases 8 and 9, which promote apoptotic cell death [90].

Another contribution to thymic atrophy in Chagas disease is the premature export of immature thymocytes to the periphery. We have shown that the infection results in premature release of immature CD4CD8 double-negative thymocytes, as well as CD4+CD8+ double-positive thymocytes that have a proinflammatory activation profile [9193]. We also found elevated levels of undifferentiated T lymphocytes in the peripheral blood of patients with severe cardiac forms of chronic Chagas disease and obtained evidence that the migration of very immature thymocytes from the infected thymus is due to sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor-1-dependent chemotaxis [94]; this points to an important role for sphingolipid signaling in the escape of undifferentiated thymocytes to the periphery in Chagas disease.

Although many pathogens induce thymic atrophy, until recently it was not clear whether negative selection eliminating T cells bearing TCRs against self-antigens was affected in the atrophic thymus. We answered this question by showing that the expression of peripheral antigens in the infected thymus is sufficient to promote negative selection in tolerance induction [93]. We provided evidence that immature thymocytes undergoing intrathymic maturation can be negatively selected during thymic atrophy. This corroborates the evidence that mature single-positive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells exiting the thymus do not harbor forbidden TCR genes [93, 95].

Although our data strengthen the notion that the infected thymus undergoing atrophy is still able to carry out negative selection, this matter should be thought of in the context of host-pathogen interactions. In Chagas infections, the parasites can colonize the thymus [96]. As a consequence, their antigens may be presented to recycling memory parasite-specific T cells moving from the periphery to the thymic microenvironment. The activation of these cells within the thymus could render them susceptible to the process of clonal deletion promoted by the thymic recognition of cognate antigens.

In addition, there is an alternative pathway in the thymus leading to the development of regulatory T cells recognizing specific antigens with high affinity TCRs [97]. Hence, the presence of T. cruzi antigens in the thymus could lead to the generation of parasite-specific regulatory T cells contributing to tolerance to parasites that target the thymus. If that process in fact occurs, it could induce central tolerance to the parasite antigens, thus undermining the establishment of protective immunity during the course of chronic disease. These issues are relevant to all host-pathogen interactions involving the thymus.

4. Concluding Remarks

The protozoa are the most ancient members of the animal kingdom and they have evolved to become one of the most dominant forms of life on earth. This evolutionary branch gave rise to the Trypanosome cruzi, a member of the kinetoplastid protozoa [98]. The survival of these parasitic unicellular organisms to the present day owes much to their efficient reproductive mechanism, with its short generation times and rapid developmental sequence producing large numbers of progeny [27]. These attributes lead to powerful infections, with an acute phase that strongly activates the host immune response. However, the acute phase involves complex molecular and cellular interactions between the pathogen and its host that can be exploited to the parasite’s benefit [5, 29, 30].

The systematic study of experimental T. cruzi infection models reveals that the parasite has ways to subverting immune defenses, and genomic studies have disclosed that it has evolved many genes devoted to this purpose [99]. However, important recent investigations focus on a new aspect of the parasite’s evasion mechanism that may favor its chronic persistence in the host. These studies have shown that different parasite strains coexist in their natural reservoirs [27]. This creates a situation where the dynamics of antigen variation within a parasite population expressing distinct subdominant T cell epitopes with low binding affinity to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules could subvert host adaptive immune responses.

In addition, our studies have raised important questions about how the parasite undermines the host immune system at a more profound level and so increases its chance of persisting chronically. The finding that the parasite targets the thymus but does not alter the capacity of the organ to induce clonal deletion of antigen-specific T cells highlights the relevant issues to be approached [93]. It is reasonable to consider that the presence of pathogen antigens in the thymus may induce the recirculation of activated T cells from the periphery to the thymus in an attempt to prevent colonization of the organ. This scenario may induce clonal deletion of pathogen-specific T cells that recognize antigens via thymic dendritic cells involved in negative selection. Alternatively, it could lead to the generation of pathogen-specific regulatory T cells that induce tolerance to persistent infection. These possibilities are important for our understanding of the establishment of T cell protective immunity and the host’s ability to control chronic persistent pathogen infections.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


This work was supported by grants from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico do Brasil (CNPq), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAP ERJ). Alexandre Morrot and Célio Geraldo Freire-de-Lima are recipients of fellowships from CNPq.


  1. A. L. Ribeiro, M. P. Nunes, M. M. Teixeira, and M. O. Rocha, “Diagnosis and management of Chagas disease and cardiomyopathy,” Nature Reviews Cardiology, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 576–589, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. M. A. Barry, J. E. Weatherhead, P. J. Hotez, and L. Woc-Colburn, “Childhood parasitic infections endemic to the United States,” Pediatric Clinics of North America, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 471–485, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. A. Prata, “Clinical and epidemiological aspects of chagas disease,” The Lancet Infectious Diseases, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 92–100, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. N. Gironès, H. Cuervo, and M. Fresno, “Trypanosoma cruzi-induced molecular mimicry and Chagas' disease,” Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 296, pp. 89–123, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  5. F. R. S. Gutierrez, P. M. M. Guedes, R. T. Gazzinelli, and J. S. Silva, “The role of parasite persistence in pathogenesis of Chagas heart disease,” Parasite Immunology, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 673–685, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. E. Cunha-Neto, P. C. Teixeira, L. G. Nogueira, and J. Kalil, “Autoimmunity,” Advances in Parasitology, vol. 76, pp. 129–152, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. E. S. Garcia, F. A. Genta, P. de Azambuja, and G. A. Schaub, “Interactions between intestinal compounds of triatomines and Trypanosoma cruzi,” Trends in Parasitology, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 499–505, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. H. B. Tanowitz, J. P. Gumprecht, D. Spurr et al., “Cytokine gene expression of endothelial cells infected with Trypanosoma cruzi,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 166, no. 3, pp. 598–603, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. H. Huang, T. M. Calderon, J. W. Berman et al., “Infection of endothelial cells with Trypanosoma cruzi activates NF-κB and induces vascular adhesion molecule expression,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 67, no. 10, pp. 5434–5440, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  10. B. Chandrasekar, P. C. Melby, D. A. Troyer, and G. L. Freeman, “Differential regulation of nitric oxide synthase isoforms in experimental acute Chagasic cardiomyopathy,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 112–119, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. M. Teixeira, R. T. Gazzinelli, and J. S. Silva, “Chemokines, inflammation and Trypanosoma cruzi infection,” Trends in Parasitology, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 262–265, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. S. Mukherjee, H. Huang, S. B. Petkova et al., “Trypanosoma cruizi infection activates extracellular signal-regulated kinase in cultured endothelial and smooth muscle cells,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 72, no. 9, pp. 5274–5282, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. K. M. Tyler, C. L. Olson, and D. M. Engman, “The life cycle of Trypanosoma cruzi,” in American Trypanosomiasis, vol. 7 of World Class Parasites, pp. 1–11, Springer, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. L. M. de Pablos and A. Osuna, “Multigene families in Trypanosoma cruzi and their role in infectivity,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 80, no. 7, pp. 2258–2264, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. K. A. Norris, B. Bradt, N. R. Cooper, and S. O. Magdalene, “Characterization of a Trypanosoma cruzi C3 binding protein with functional and genetic similarities to the human complement regulatory protein, decay-accelerating factor,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 147, no. 7, pp. 2240–2247, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  16. S. Zambrano-Villa, D. Rosales-Borjas, J. C. Carrero, and L. Ortiz-Ortiz, “How protozoan parasites evade the immune response,” Trends in Parasitology, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 272–278, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. D. M. Paulnock and S. P. Coller, “Analysis of macrophage activation in African trypanosomiasis,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 685–690, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  18. M. Desjardins and A. Descoteaux, “Inhibition of phagolysosomal biogenesis by the Leishmania lipophosphoglycan,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 185, no. 12, pp. 2061–2068, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. A. L. Sorensen, A. S. Hey, and A. Kharazmi, “Leishmania major surface protease Gp63 interferes with the function of human monocytes and neutrophils in vitro,” Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 265–271, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. C. Bogdan and M. Röllinghoff, “How do protozoan parasites survive inside macrophages?” Parasitology Today, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 22–28, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. J. de Diego, C. Punzón, M. Duarte, and M. Fresno, “Alteration of macrophage function by a Trypanosoma cruzi membrane mucin,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 159, no. 10, pp. 4983–4989, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  22. P. S. Doyle, Y. M. Zhou, I. Hsieh, D. C. Greenbaum, J. H. McKerrow, and J. C. Engel, “The trypanosoma cruzi protease cruzain mediates immune evasion,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 7, no. 9, Article ID e1002139, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. C. A. Hunter, L. A. Ellis-Neyes, T. Slifer et al., “IL-10 is required to prevent immune hyperactivity during infection with Trypanosoma cruzi,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 158, no. 7, pp. 3311–3316, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  24. J. S. Silva, D. R. Twardzik, and S. G. Reed, “Regulation of Trypanosoma cruzi infections in vitro and in vivo by transforming growth factor β (TGF-β),” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 174, no. 3, pp. 539–545, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. L. Lauria-Pires and A. R. L. Teixeira, “Virulence and pathogenicity associated with diversity of Trypanosoma cruzi stocks and clones derived from Chagas' disease patients,” The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 304–310, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  26. M. R. S. Briones, R. P. Souto, B. S. Stolf, and B. Zingales, “The evolution of two Trypanosoma cruzi subgroups inferred from rRNA genes can be correlated with the interchange of American mammalian faunas in the Cenozoic and has implications to pathogenicity and host specificity,” Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 219–232, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. F. Noireau, P. Diosque, and A. M. Jansen, “Trypanosoma cruzi: adaptation to its vectors and its hosts,” Veterinary Research, vol. 40, no. 2, article 26, pp. 1–23, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. D. L. Martin, D. B. Weatherly, S. A. Laucella et al., “CD8+ T-Cell responses to Trypanosoma cruzi are highly focused on strain-variant trans-sialidase epitopes,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 2, no. 8, article e77, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. G. A. DosReis, C. G. Freire-De-Lima, M. P. Nunes, and M. F. Lopes, “The importance of aberrant T-cell responses in Chagas disease,” Trends in Parasitology, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 237–243, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. F. Nagajyothi, F. S. Machado, B. A. Burleigh et al., “Mechanisms of Trypanosoma cruzi persistence in Chagas disease,” Cellular Microbiology, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 634–643, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. A. Oladiran and M. Belosevic, “Immune evasion strategies of trypanosomes: a review,” Journal of Parasitology, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 284–292, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. F. Y. Liew, M. T. Scott, D. S. Liu, and S. L. Croft, “Suppressive substance produced by T cells from mice chronically infected with Trypanosoma cruzi. I. Preferential inhibition of the induction of delayed-type hypersensitivity,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 139, no. 7, pp. 2452–2457, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  33. F. Kierszenbaum, J. L. de Diego, M. Fresno, and M. B. Sztein, “Inhibitory effects of the Trypanosoma cruzi membrane glycoprotein AGC10 on the expression of IL-2 receptor chains and secretion of cytokines by subpopulations of activated human T lymphocytes,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1684–1691, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. F. Kierszenbaum, M. Fresno, and M. B. Sztein, “The Trypanosoma cruzi membrane glycoprotein AGC10 inhibits human lymphocyte activation by a mechanism preceding translation of both, interleukin-2 and its high-affinity receptor subunits,” Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology, vol. 125, no. 1-2, pp. 91–101, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. L. van Overtvelt, M. Andrieu, V. Verhasselt et al., “Trypanosoma cruzi down-regulates lipopolysaccharide-induced MHC class I on human dendritic cells and impairs antigen presentation to specific CD8+ T lymphocytes,” International Immunology, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1135–1144, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. G. A. DosReis, “Evasion of immune responses by Trypanosoma cruzi, the etiological agent of Chagas disease,” Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 84–90, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. P. Alcaide and M. Fresno, “The Trypanosoma cruzi membrane mucin AgC10 inhibits T cell activation and IL-2 transcription through L-selectin,” International Immunology, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 1365–1375, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. A. M. Padilla, L. J. Simpson, and R. L. Tarleton, “Insufficient TLR activation contributes to the slow development of CD8+ T cell responses in Trypanosoma cruzi infection,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 183, no. 2, pp. 1245–1252, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. M. J. Pinazo, G. Espinosa, C. Cortes-Lletget et al., “Immunosuppression and chagas disease: a management challenge,” PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 7, no. 1, Article ID e1965, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. J. R. Maleckar and F. Kierszenbaum, “Inhibition of mitogen-induced proliferation of mouse T and B lymphocytes by bloodstream forms of Trypanosoma cruzi,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 130, no. 2, pp. 908–911, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
  41. L. Ortiz-Ortiz, D. E. Parks, M. Rodriguez, and W. O. Weigle, “Polyclonal B lymphocyte activation during Trypanosoma cruzi infection,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 121–126, 1980. View at: Google Scholar
  42. I. A. Abrahamsohn and R. L. Coffman, “Cytokine and nitric oxide regulation of the immunosuppression in Trypanosoma cruzi infection,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 155, no. 8, pp. 3955–3963, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  43. G. A. Martins, M. A. G. Cardoso, J. C. S. Aliberti, and J. S. Silva, “Nitric oxide-induced apoptotic cell death in the acute phase of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in mice,” Immunology Letters, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 113–120, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. M. P. Nunes, R. M. Andrade, M. F. Lopes, and G. A. DosReis, “Activation-induced T cell death exacerbates Trypanosoma cruzi replication in macrophages cocultured with CD4+ T lymphocytes from infected hosts,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 160, no. 3, pp. 1313–1319, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  45. S. Schenkman, M.-S. Jiang, G. W. Hart, and V. Nussenzweig, “A novel cell surface trans-sialidase of Trypanosoma cruzi generates a stage-specific epitope required for invasion of mammalian cells,” Cell, vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 1117–1125, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. S. Schenkman, D. Eichinger, M. E. A. Pereira, and V. Nussenzweig, “Structural and functional properties of Trypanosoma trans-sialidase,” Annual Review of Microbiology, vol. 48, pp. 499–523, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. J. O. Previato, C. Jones, M. T. Xavier et al., “Structural characterization of the major glycosylphosphatidylinositol membrane-anchored glycoprotein from epimastigote forms of Trypanosoma cruzi Y-strain,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 270, no. 13, pp. 7241–7250, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. M. Eugenia Giorgi and R. M. de Lederkremer, “Trans-sialidase and mucins of Trypanosoma cruzi: an important interplay for the parasite,” Carbohydrate Research, vol. 346, no. 12, pp. 1389–1393, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. J. M. Di Noia, D. O. Sanchez, and A. C. C. Frasch, “The protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi has a family of genes resembling the mucin genes of mammalian cells,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 270, no. 41, pp. 24146–24149, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. C. A. Buscaglia, V. A. Campo, A. C. C. Frasch, and J. M. di Noia, “Trypanosoma cruzi surface mucins: host-dependent coat diversity,” Nature reviews. Microbiology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 229–236, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. L. Mendonça-Previato, L. Penha, T. C. Garcez, C. Jones, and J. O. Previato, “Addition of α-O-GlcNAc to threonine residues define the post-translational modification of mucin-like molecules in Trypanosoma cruzi,” Glycoconjugate Journal, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 659–666, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. K. Joiner, A. Sher, T. Gaither, and C. Hammer, “Evasion of alternative complement pathway by Trypanosoma cruzi results from inefficient binding of factor B,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 83, no. 17, pp. 6593–6597, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. R. T. Gazzinelli, M. E. S. Pereira, A. Romanha, G. Gazzinelli, and Z. Brener, “Direct lysis of Trypanosoma cruzi: a novel effector mechanism of protection mediated by human anti-gal antibodies,” Parasite Immunology, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 345–356, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. T. L. Kipnis, J. R. David, C. A. Alper, A. Sher, and W. D. da Silva, “Enzymatic treatment transforms trypomastigotes of Trypanosoma cruzi into activators of alternative complement pathway and potentiates their uptake by macrophages,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 602–605, 1981. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. V. L. Pereira-Chioccola, A. Acosta-Serrano, I. C. De Almeida et al., “Mucin-like molecules form a negatively charged coat that protects Trypanosoma cruzi trypomastigotes from killing by human anti-α-galactosyl antibodies,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 113, no. 7, pp. 1299–1307, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  56. H. Erdmann, C. Steeg, F. Koch-Nolte, B. Fleischer, and T. Jacobs, “Sialylated ligands on pathogenic Trypanosoma cruzi interact with Siglec-E (sialic acid-binding Ig-like lectin-E),” Cellular Microbiology, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 1600–1611, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. M. P. Nunes, B. Fortes, J. L. Silva-Filho et al., “Inhibitory effects of Trypanosoma cruzi sialoglycoproteins on C D4+ T Cells are associated with increased susceptibility to infection,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 10, Article ID e77568, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  58. H. Erdmann, C. Steeg, F. Koch-Nolte, B. Fleischer, and T. Jacobs, “Sialylated ligands on pathogenic Trypanosoma cruzi interact with Siglec-E (sialic acid-binding Ig-like lectin-E),” Cellular Microbiology, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 1600–1611, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. T. Jacobs, H. Erdmann, and B. Fleischer, “Molecular interaction of Siglecs (sialic acid-binding Ig-like lectins) with sialylated ligands on Trypanosoma cruzi,” European Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 113–116, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. A. Ouaissi, A. C. da Silva, A. G. Guevara, M. Borges, and E. Guilvard, “Trypanosoma cruzi-induced host immune system dysfunction: a rationale for parasite immunosuppressive factor(s) encoding gene targeting,” Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 11–17, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. A. M. Acosta and C. A. Santos-Buch, “Autoimmune myocarditis induced by Trypanosoma cruzi,” Circulation, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 1255–1261, 1985. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. F. Kierszenbaum, “Chagas' disease and the autoimmunity hypothesis,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 210–223, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  63. D. M. Engman and J. S. Leon, “Pathogenesis of Chagas heart disease: role of autoimmunity,” Acta Tropica, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 123–132, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. L. Klein, M. Hinterberger, G. Wirnsberger, and B. Kyewski, “Antigen presentation in the thymus for positive selection and central tolerance induction,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 833–844, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. A. Basten and P. A. Silveira, “B-cell tolerance: mechanisms and implications,” Current Opinion in Immunology, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 566–574, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. K. Pieper, B. Grimbacher, and H. Eibel, “B-cell biology and development,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 131, no. 4, pp. 959–971, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. A. A. Freitas and B. Rocha, “Population biology of lymphocytes: the flight for survival,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 18, pp. 83–111, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. C. Montaudouin, M. Anson, Y. Hao et al., “Quorum sensing contributes to activated IgM-secreting B cell homeostasis,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 190, no. 1, pp. 106–114, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. C. A. M. Bento, M. B. Melo, J. O. Previato, L. Mendonça-Previato, and L. M. T. Peçanha, “Glycoinositolphospholipids purified from Trypanosoma cruzi stimulate Ig production in vitro,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 157, no. 11, pp. 4996–5001, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  70. J. O. Previato, R. Wait, C. Jones et al., “Glycoinositolphospholipid from Trypanosoma cruzi: structure, biosynthesis and immunobiology,” Advances in Parasitology, vol. 56, pp. 1–41, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. A.-C. Oliveira, J. R. Peixoto, L. B. De Arrada et al., “Expression of functional TLR4 confers proinflammatory responsiveness to Trypanosoma cruzi glycoinositolphospholipids and higher resistance to infection with T. cruzi,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 173, no. 9, pp. 5688–5696, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. B. Reina-San-Martín, W. Degrave, C. Rougeot et al., “A B-cell mitogen from a pathogenic trypanosome is a eukaryotic proline racemase,” Nature Medicine, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 890–897, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. N. Chamond, C. Grégoire, N. Coatnoan et al., “Biochemical characterization of proline racemases from the human protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi and definition of putative protein signatures,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 18, pp. 15484–15494, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. F. S. Dhabhar, “A hassle a day may keep the pathogens away: the fight-or-flight stress response and the augmentation of immune function,” Integrative and Comparative Biology, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 215–236, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. E. Calcagni and I. Elenkov, “Stress system activity, innate and T helper cytokines, and susceptibility to immune-related diseases,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1069, pp. 62–76, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. E. Roggero, A. R. Pérez, M. Tamae-Kakazu et al., “Edogenous glucocorticoids cause thymus atrophy but are protective during acute Trypanosoma cruzi infection,” Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 190, no. 2, pp. 495–503, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. A. R. Pérez, L. R. Berbert, A. Lepletier et al., “TNF-α is involved in the abnormal thymocyte migration during experimental Trypanosoma cruzi infection and favors the export of immature cells,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 3, Article ID e34360, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. W. Savino and M. Dardenne, “Neuroendocrine control of thymus physiology,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 412–443, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. W. Savino, “The thymus is a common target organ in infectious diseases,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 2, no. 6, article e62, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. W. Savino, M. Dardenne, C. Marche et al., “Thymic epithelium in AIDS. An immunohistologic study,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 122, no. 2, pp. 302–307, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  81. H. Suzuki, M. Motohara, A. Miyake et al., “Intrathymic effect of acute pathogenic SHIV infection on T-lineage cells in newborn macaques,” Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 667–679, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. C. Godfraind, K. V. Holmes, and J.-P. Coutelier, “Thymus involution induced by mouse hepatitis virus A59 in BALB/c mice,” Journal of Virology, vol. 69, no. 10, pp. 6541–6547, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  83. W. Chen, R. Kuolee, J. W. Austin, H. Shen, Y. Che, and J. W. Conlan, “Low dose aerosol infection of mice with virulent type A Francisella tularensis induces severe thymus atrophy and CD4+CD8+ thymocyte depletion,” Microbial Pathogenesis, vol. 39, no. 5-6, pp. 189–196, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. S. R. Watson, T. J. Redington, T. B. Miller, and W. E. Bullock, “Flow microfluorometry analysis of alterations in T-lymphocyte subsets during murine listeriosis,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 372–377, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  85. M. C. Leite de Moraes, M. Hontebeyrie-Joskowicz, F. Leboulenger, W. Savino, M. Dardenne, and F. Lepault, “Studies on the thymus in Chagas' disease. II. Thymocyte subset fluctuations in Trypanosoma cruzi-infected mice: relationship to stress,” Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 267–275, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. E. Seixas and D. Ostler, “Plasmodium chabaudi chabaudi (AS): differential cellular responses to infection in resistant and susceptible mice,” Experimental Parasitology, vol. 110, no. 4, pp. 394–405, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. V. N. Brito, P. C. S. Souto, M. A. Cruz-Höfling, L. C. Ricci, and L. Verinaud, “Thymus invasion and atrophy induced by Paracoccidioides brasiliensis in BALB/c mice,” Medical Mycology, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 83–87, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  88. S. R. Watson, T. B. Miller, T. J. Redington, and W. E. Bullock, “Immunoregulation in experimental disseminated histoplasmosis: flow microfluorometry (FMF) of the Thy and Lyt phenotypes of T lymphocytes from infected mice,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 131, no. 2, pp. 984–990, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
  89. A. R. Pérez, E. Roggero, A. Nicora et al., “Thymus atrophy during Trypanosoma cruzi infection is caused by an immuno-endocrine imbalance,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 890–900, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. D. A. Farias-de-Oliveira, D. M. S. Villa-Verde, P. H. N. Panzenhagen et al., “Caspase-8 and caspase-9 mediate thymocyte apoptosis in Trypanosoma cruzi acutely infected mice,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 227–234, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. M. C. Leite-de-Moraes, M. Hontebeyrie-Joskowicz, M. Dardenne, and W. Savino, “Modulation of thymocyte subsets during acute and chronic phases of experimental Trypanosoma cruzi infection,” Immunology, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 95–98, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  92. J. de Meis, A. Morrot, D. A. Farias-de-Oliveira, D. M. S. Villa-Verde, and W. Savino, “Differential regional immune response in Chagas disease,” PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 3, no. 7, article e417, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. A. Morrot, E. Terra-Granado, A. R. Pérez et al., “Chagasic thymic atrophy does not affect negative selection but results in the export of activated CD4+CD8+ T cells in severe forms of human disease,” PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 5, no. 8, Article ID e1268, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. A. Lepletier, L. de Almeida, L. Santos et al., “Early double-negative thymocyte export in Trypanosoma cruzi infection is restricted by sphingosine receptors and associated with human chagas disease,” PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 8, no. 10, Article ID e3203, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. D. A. Mendes-da-Cruz, J. de Meis, V. Cotta-de-Almeida, and W. Savino, “Experimental Trypanosoma cruzi infection alters the shaping of the central and peripheral T-cell repertoire,” Microbes and Infection, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 825–832, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. W. Savino, M. Do Carmo Leite-de-Moraes, M. Hontebeyrie-Joskowicz, and M. Dardenne, “Studies on the thymus in Chagas' disease. I. Changes in the thymic microenvironment in mice acutely infected with Trypanosoma cruzi,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1727–1733, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. R. Pacholczyk and J. Kern, “The T-cell receptor repertoire of regulatory T cells,” Immunology, vol. 125, no. 4, pp. 450–458, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. A. P. Jackson, “Genome evolution in trypanosomatid parasites,” Parasitology, pp. 1–17, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. A. M. Macedo, C. R. Machado, R. P. Oliveira, and S. D. J. Pena, “Trypanosoma cruzi: genetic structure of populations and relevance of genetic variability to the pathogenesis of chagas disease,” Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2004. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Ana Flávia Nardy et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

4949 Views | 1382 Downloads | 29 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.