Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Immunology Research
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 281287, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/281287
Review Article

Osteoimmunology: Major and Costimulatory Pathway Expression Associated with Chronic Inflammatory Induced Bone Loss

1Discipline of Anatomy and Pathology, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
2Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Yaacob Latif, Bandar Tun Razak, 56000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Received 17 October 2014; Accepted 10 December 2014

Academic Editor: Giorgio Mori

Copyright © 2015 Tania N. Crotti et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The field of osteoimmunology has emerged in response to the range of evidences demonstrating the close interrelationship between the immune system and bone metabolism. This is pertinent to immune-mediated diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis and periodontal disease, where there are chronic inflammation and local bone erosion. Periprosthetic osteolysis is another example of chronic inflammation with associated osteolysis. This may also involve immune mediation when occurring in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Similarities in the regulation and mechanisms of bone loss are likely to be related to the inflammatory cytokines expressed in these diseases. This review highlights the role of immune-related factors influencing bone loss particularly in diseases of chronic inflammation where there is associated localized bone loss. The importance of the balance of the RANKL-RANK-OPG axis is discussed as well as the more recently appreciated role that receptors and adaptor proteins involved in the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM) signaling pathway play. Although animal models are briefly discussed, the focus of this review is on the expression of ITAM associated molecules in relation to inflammation induced localized bone loss in RA, chronic periodontitis, and periprosthetic osteolysis, with an emphasis on the soluble and membrane bound factor osteoclast-associated receptor (OSCAR).

1. Introduction

The term osteoimmunology and the study of osteoimmunology have developed due to the close interrelationship between the immune system and bone metabolism [1]. This is evident in immune-mediated diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis and periodontal disease (periodontitis), where there are local bone erosion and inflammation as reviewed in detail in multiple publications [24]. Similarities in the mechanisms of bone loss in disease are likely related to the inflammatory cytokines expressed in a number of bone loss diseases. These cytokines are known to upregulate osteoclast activity via increased expression levels of receptor activator NF kappa B ligand (RANKL) relative to osteoprotegerin (OPG) (as explored below) and increase localized bone loss in diseases such as RA, periodontal disease, and periprosthetic osteolysis [510].

This review highlights the role of immune-related cells and factors in modulating bone loss, particularly in these diseases. While the importance of the RANKL-RANK-OPG axis has been appreciated for nearly two decades [1113], more recent studies have highlighted the importance of factors associated with immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM) signalling. This review will briefly discuss the RANKL-RANK-OPG axis but its major focus will be on the role of ITAM-associated factors, the more recently investigated pathway, and how it relates to inflammatory bone loss diseases, in particular osteoclast-associated receptor (OSCAR) [14].

2. Chronic Inflammation-Mediated Bone Loss

2.1. Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) affects 1-2% of the population and involves an autoimmune reaction with an autoantibody response to citrullinated proteins (and others such as rheumatoid factor and collagen type II) [15]. RA is characterized by synovitis involving angiogenesis, synovial proliferation, increased infiltration, survival, and decreased apoptosis of inflammatory cells [16]. Further to this there is an increase in osteoclast number and activity leading to focal bone erosions, juxta-articular osteopenia, and joint destruction [1720]. Animal models suggest that there may also be suppression of localised osteoblast formation of bone [21].

2.2. Periodontitis and Similarities to RA

Periodontitis is a chronic inflammatory disease of the gingival tissues, with an associated loss of the supporting structures including the periodontal ligament and alveolar bone. The aetiology involves an inflammatory response to bacterial infection such as P. gingivalis and possibly an autoimmune reaction, as reviewed [22]. Periodontitis is the most common and widespread bone loss pathology in humans with 64% of the US population aged 65 years and older reported as having moderate or severe periodontitis [23]. Despite the prevalence of this disease the most common treatment is either mechanical subgingival plaque removal or surgical debridement. Inevitably, in the absence of effective treatment, support structures (periodontium) are compromised and the affected teeth will loosen and fall out.

RA and periodontitis have a similar pathophysiology, characterized by destructive inflammation that culminates in localized bone loss. The citrullination of proteins by P. gingivalis and the subsequent generation of autoantigens that drive autoimmunity in RA have been proposed as a possible mechanism linking these two diseases [24]. Similarities in RA and periodontitis may relate to citrullinated enolase as the specific antigen involved as well as cross-reaction between the antibodies directed towards the immunodominant epitope of human citrullinated alpha-enolase and a conserved sequence on citrullinated P. gingivalis enolase [25].

New evidence suggests a relationship between the extent and severity of chronic periodontitis and RA [24, 25]. Individuals with advanced RA are more likely to experience more significant periodontal problems compared to their non-RA counterparts and vice versa. This is supported by findings in a study using a combined animal model of RA and periodontitis [26], which demonstrated more severe development of arthritis in mice with periodontitis. Further to this, mice in which periodontitis alone was induced had evidence of radiocarpal bone loss in the absence of arthritic disease [26]. Additionally, mice in which inflammatory arthritis was induced also had evidence of periodontitis [26]. This suggests presence of either RA or periodontitis places the individual at risk of developing the other disease. Both conditions involve an imbalance between proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines and increased bone-resorbing activity. Cantley et al. (2011) thus proposed that these two diseases are related through a common underlying dysfunction of fundamental inflammatory mechanisms [26]. New treatment strategies are needed for both diseases that target the inhibition of proinflammatory cytokines, destructive enzymes, and bone-resorbing activity. The clinical implications of the current research strongly suggest that patients with RA should be carefully screened for their periodontal status, as reviewed [27].

2.3. Peri-Prosthetic Osteolysis

Joint replacement surgery is used as a last resort in osteoarthritis (OA) and RA patients and is a relatively successful operation; however, a large proportion of implants fail within 10–20 years as a result of bone loss and implant loosening [4, 10, 28]. The pathogenesis behind prosthetic implant failure involves wear of prosthetic alloys, such as polyethylene (PE), cobalt chrome, and titanium liberated from the implant surface [2931]. These particles stimulate a chronic inflammatory response [29], which increases bone-resorbing activity of the osteoclasts [32] and suppresses bone formation by the osteoblast [33, 34] resulting in bone loss [25]. Periprosthetic tissues contain granulomatous lesions dominated by inflammatory cells, particularly macrophages, and foreign-body giant cells [2931, 35, 36]. It is believed that an inflammatory reaction is initiated within the tissues in an attempt at particle clearance. This then becomes a chronic reaction resulting in a granulomatous lesion. This granulomatous lesion in periprosthetic osteolysis often leads to the formation of pseudosynovium-like structure, in which cells are organized into lining layer, in the membranous tissues adjacent to the failed implant surface [35]. Juxtaposed to this pseudosynovium are fibrous and collagenous regions, possibly scar tissues, which could be indicative of late stage periprosthetic osteolysis. The plethora of factors release in this inflammatory reaction within the tissues contributes towards the promotion of osteoclast formation [9, 37].

Higher numbers of T lymphocytes have been observed in the periprosthetic tissues of human and mouse models containing polyethylene and metal particles compared with normal tissues [3840] and osteoarthritic tissues [41]. Sandhu et al. (1998) proposed that T cells are indirectly affected by the inflammatory cascade induced by wear particles [40]. It is however important to note that T cells make up less than 10% of total cell population [42] in periprosthetic tissues. Given the low levels of T lymphocytes, the general belief held is that lymphocyte infiltrates are not normally associated with wear-particle induced periprosthetic osteolysis, in particular, in the granulomatous region [29, 32, 42, 43]. The role of T cells may however be more pertinent in RA patients with implants. The prevalence of foreign-body giant cells in response to implant-derived wear debris in RA patients and non-RA patients does not differ but appears to be linked to the amount of polyethylene wear debris [36]. As would be expected, this study reported a high prevalence of plasma cells in lymphocytic infiltrates in untreated RA patients compared with non-RA patients with a different distribution [36]. Whether implant wear is inducing a different reaction in RA versus non-RA patients may potentially have implications for combination and immune targeted treatment of inflammation and osteolysis in these patients.

3. RANKL-RANK-OPG Axis

Receptor activator NF kappa B ligand- (RANKL-) RANK signalling has several important roles in the immune system and bone [13, 4446]. Physiologically, RANKL is required for normal development of lymph nodes [13], as evident in knockout mice. In bone, RANKL interaction with its receptor, RANK, expressed by the osteoclast, induces the transcription factor nuclear factor of activated T cells-1 (NFATc1) [4749]. NFATc1 is an essential factor for differentiation, multi-nucleation and activation [4749]. NFATc1 binds directly to and regulates osteoclast differentiation genes such as tartrate resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) [50], cathepsin K (Cath K) [51], osteoclast-associated receptor (OSCAR) [52], β3-integrin [53, 54], and calcitonin receptor (CTR) [50]. NFATc1 is also involved in autoregulation of itself, further enhancing gene expression and osteoclast differentiation [55].

RANK-RANKL interaction is inhibited by the decoy receptor OPG [12] and thus the ratio of RANKL to OPG has a crucial influence on bone resorption [56]. Interactions between RANK expressing cells of the lamina propria and T cells expressing RANKL also play a role in intestinal inflammation [57]. In the vasculature, RANKL interacts with RANK to promote survival of endothelial cells [58]. Additionally, RANKL is upregulated in the keratinocytes of inflamed skin [59]. Further to this, in an inflammatory arthritis model reminiscent of RA, activated T cells exacerbate joint destruction via RANKL upregulation [46].

3.1. RANKL-RANK-OPG in Bone Pathologies

The RANK-RANKL-OPG axis is known to regulate not only normal bone physiology but also alterations in RANK-RANKL-OPG interactions that play a role in bone disease. Uncoupling in the balance between the level and activity of these molecules culminates in osteoporotic or osteopetrotic phenotypes due to an increase or decrease in osteoclast formation and activity. This is particularly evident in focal bone loss associated with chronic inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, periodontal disease, and periprosthetic bone loss. In active RA, periodontal disease, and prosthetic loosening, elevated levels of RANKL relative to OPG are observed in the synovial-like soft tissue, gingival tissue, and soft tissues adjacent to sites of osteolysis [510]. Further to this the elevated ratio of RANKL : OPG expression is associated with increased differentiation and activity of the bone-resorbing osteoclasts [5, 79, 32, 60], suggesting RANKL : OPG ratio as an important indicator for bone erosion.

As RANKL and OPG are key molecules regulating bone loss in diseases, therapeutic interventions targeting these molecules and their signaling cascades are being investigated to treat a wide range of diseases.

3.2. RANKL-RANK-OPG in RA

Osteoclasts are the prominent cell eroding bone in inflammatory arthritis [20]. A seminal paper in the field of osteoimmunology used a RANKL knockout background to demonstrate that animals developed an osteopetrotic phenotype and a reduction in bone erosion, characterized by the absence of osteoclasts, whilst inflammation did not differ between wild-type and RANKL knockout mice [61]. In contrast, cartilage erosion was present in both control littermate and RANKL knockout mice [61], suggesting that the RANK-RANKL-OPG axis does not directly affect cartilage metabolism.

In human studies, the levels of soluble RANKL have been found to be higher than OPG in synovial fluids from patients with RA compared with osteoarthritis (OA) patients [62] suggesting a role in increased bone resorption. In support of this, a more recent large center study has reported the ratio of RANKL : OPG and markers of bone and cartilage degradation (such as collagen terminal 1 (CTX-1)) to be predictive of progression of radiological bone damage in RA [60].

In synovial tissues from patients with active RA, RANKL expression is predominantly located in sublining regions [62, 63] concentrated at focal sites of osteoclastic bone erosion in the pannus- bone interface [64]. In contrast, OPG has been described as being in regions of synovium some distance from the sites of bone erosion in RA [64]. We reported OPG is associated with endothelial cells and macrophages in the synovial lining layer of OA and normal tissues whilst absent in patients with active RA [63]. RANKL expressing cells have been detected in a subset of fibroblast-like synoviocytes and infiltrating mononuclear cells [62]. Further to this, activated synoviocytes from RA tissue express RANKL and have decreased OPG and are capable of supporting osteoclastogenesis in vitro [65]. RANKL expressing cells are also seen within areas of lymphocyte infiltration and dual immunostaining by ourselves, and others have shown that many of the RANKL-positive cells are a subset of CD3+ and CD4+ cells [6, 62, 63]. Activated T cells from RA patients have increased RANKL are able to induce osteoclast formation in vitro [62]. This study also reported a higher ratio of soluble RANKL relative to OPG suggesting T cells as a source of soluble RANKL in RA [62].

NFATc1 is a transcription factor crucial to RANKL-RANK signaling in the osteoclasts [47] and is initially identified as being expressed by T cells and involved in regulation of cytokine transcription [66]. We observed NFATc1 positive cells in lymphocyte aggregates in RA tissues [67]. Many of the NFATc1-immunostained mononuclear cells observed were single nucleated and thus could be either precursor cells of osteoclasts such as macrophages, or lymphocytes. Those with lymphocyte morphology are most likely activated T cells as most of them demonstrated NFATc1 positive staining localized mainly in nucleus [67]. These cells may promote osteoclastogenesis through the RANK/RANKL pathway [39] because as already mentioned, as activated T-cells demonstrate elevated expression of membrane-bound RANKL with the ability to support osteoclastogenesis in vitro [62].

3.3. RANKL-RANK-OPG in Periodontal Disease

The relative ratio of RANKL to OPG is also a significant indicator in bone loss associated with periodontal disease [5, 69]. Soluble RANKL is significantly higher in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) of periodontitis patients than in healthy GCF, while OPG is not [69]. Similar to RA, B and T lymphocytes express RANKL in gingival tissues associated with periodontitis [5, 69] with expression of more than 50 and 90% of T cells and B cells, respectively. Consistent with a role in osteoclast regulation, lymphocytes isolated from gingival tissues of patients induced differentiation of mature osteoclast cells in a RANKL-dependent manner in vitro [69]. These results suggest that activated T and B cells can be the cellular source of RANKL and an inducer of bone resorption in periodontal disease.

In a crude mRNA analysis of tissue from dental patients, those with periodontitis exhibited significantly higher NFATc1 gene expression, compared with healthy subjects. Interestingly, NFATc1 and RANKL expression levels strongly correlated with each other and with clinical periodontal parameters [70].

3.4. RANK-RANKL-OPG in Peri-Prosthetic Osteolysis

Aseptic bone loss adjacent to orthopedic joint implants is a common cause of joint implant failure in humans. RANK, RANKL, and tumour necrosis factor (TNF-α) are key modulators of bone turnover and their expression has been reported by ourselves and others in the tissues near periprosthetic osteolysis in patients undergoing revision of total hip prostheses [9, 71, 72]. These factors were strongly expressed by large multinucleated cells containing polyethylene wear debris in revision tissues [9]. More interestingly a strong statistical correlation was found between volume of bone loss, polyethylene wear debris, and RANK, RANKL, and TNF-α expression [9]. This was consistent with the earlier findings of Stea et al. (2000) [72] where immunohistochemical detection of TNF-α positively correlated with radiographic scores of osteolysis.

In periprosthetic osteolysis, elevated levels of RANKL, relative to its competitor OPG, are associated with increased differentiation and activity of the bone-resorbing osteoclasts [8, 32, 73]. An earlier study had shown that cells isolated from periprosthetic tissues containing wear particles expressed mRNA encoding for the proosteoclastogenic molecules, RANKL, its receptor RANK, monocyte colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF), interleukin- (IL-) 1 beta, TNF-α, IL-6, and soluble IL-6 receptor, as well as OPG [8]. Other studies showed that osteoclasts formed from cells isolated from periprosthetic tissues in the presence and absence of human osteoblastic cells in vitro [8, 74]. When osteoclasts formed in the absence of osteoblastic cells, markedly higher levels of RANKL mRNA relative to OPG mRNA were expressed. Particles of prosthetic materials also stimulated human monocytes to express both osteoclast-associated genes and osteoclast mediating factors in vitro [8]. These findings suggest that ingestion of prosthetic wear particles by macrophages results in expression of osteoclast-differentiating molecules and stimulation of macrophage differentiation into osteoclasts [8]. Subsequent immunohistochemical studies demonstrate significantly higher levels of RANKL in the periprosthetic tissues of patients with implant failure than in similar tissues from osteoarthritic and healthy subjects [32]. In contrast, OPG protein levels were similar in all tissues with the net result of higher RANKL : OPG ratio [32]. Of interest, RANKL protein and mRNA were predominantly associated with macrophage cells containing wear particles in the periprosthetic tissues [32]. These findings support the contention that high levels of RANKL in periprosthetic tissues of patients with prosthetic loosening may significantly contribute to aseptic implant loosening [32].

We observed both mRNA and protein expressions of NFATc1 to be higher in periprosthetic osteolysis than in OA tissues although levels did not reach significance [75]. This is consistent with low T lymphocyte numbers observed in these tissues. This may provide an explanation why lower than expected NFATc1 protein and mRNA levels are found in periprosthetic osteolytic tissues.

4. The ITAM Pathway in Osteoimmunology

The ITAM pathway regulates proliferation, survival, and differentiation of effector immune cells and provides osteoclasts with costimulatory signals [14, 7680]. In preosteoclasts and osteoclasts, innate immune receptors, TREM2 and OSCAR, associate with the ITAM adaptor proteins DAP12 and Fc receptor gamma-chain (FcRγ), respectively [80, 81]. DAP12 and TREM2 are required for differentiation into multinucleated, bone-resorbing osteoclasts in vitro via phosphorylation of the Syk tyrosine kinase [79]. OSCAR on the cell surface mediates signal transduction via FcRγ [82, 83] (Figure 1). The induction of intracellular calcium via this pathway is required in conjunction with RANKL-RANK interaction for NFATc1 induction [84].

Figure 1: RANGL-RANK-OPG axis and ITAM, the costimulatory pathway, in inflammation induced localised bone loss pathologies.
4.1. Mutations of ITAM-Associated Molecules and Bone Phenotypes In Vivo

In the context of human pathology the roles of TREM2 or DAP12 have only begun to be recognized. Studies in diseased tissues, particularly in Nasu-Hakola disease [8587] and very recently in Alzheimer’s disease [88], have shown that these molecules may be involved. Mutations in TREM2 or DAP12 have been associated with bone pathologies such as bone cysts and increased fractures (in addition to presenile dementia) in Nasu-Hakola disease [87, 89]. These studies support a role for DAP12 and a relationship between the skeletal and psychotic characteristics observed in Nasu-Hakola disease and for schizophrenia and presenile dementia [90]. In TREM2 deficient individuals the osteoclast precursors failed to differentiate into effective bone-resorbing cells [91]. Consistent with this, Paloneva et al. [87] demonstrated that function mutations in DAP12 and TREM2 result in an inefficient and delayed differentiation of osteoclasts in vitro. In postmenopausal osteoporosis a rare allele (G allele) of OSCAR-2322A> G (SNP in the 5′ flanking region) has been associated with lower bone mineral density [92].

Although animal models are not the focus of this review it is interesting to note the phenotypes of ITAM related molecules in single and combination knockouts. TREM−/− mice have an osteopenic phenotype similar to Nasu-Hakola disease. In vitro, lack of TREM2 impairs proliferation osteoclast precursors and affects the rate of osteoclastogenesis by accelerating differentiation into mature osteoclasts [93] suggesting different effects of knocking out TREM2 in vivo and in vitro. In DAP12 deficient mice (−/−) there are an increased bone mass (osteopetrosis) and impeded development of osteoclasts. Mice that are double knockout for the adaptors DAP12−/− and FcRγ−/− are severely osteopetrotic and bone marrow derived osteoclast precursors from these mice are unable to differentiate into mature osteoclasts in a RANKL- and M-CSF-mediated culture system [79, 82]. Although there is some redundancy, findings from these studies suggest that DAP12 is the predominant factor responsible for optimal osteoclast differentiation.

4.2. OSCAR Signalling and Function in Bone Regulation

OSCAR is an IgG-like receptor expressed by monocytes, macrophages monocyte-derived dendritic cells in humans, and is involved in antigen presentation as well as survival, maturation, and activation of dendritic cells [14, 76, 77, 83, 94, 95]. Ligation of human OSCAR on monocytes and neutrophils results in the induction of a proinflammatory cascade and the initiation of downstream immune responses [95]. Importantly, cell bound OSCAR on osteoclast precursors is an essential costimulatory factor in osteoclast formation but does not bypass the requirement of RANKL. RANKL-RANK induction of NFATc1 expression precedes that of OSCAR [96] and is crucial for induction of OSCAR gene expression [52]. In addition, ligand-activated OSCAR interacts with FcRγ to produce an increase in intracellular calcium [95] that augments NFATc1 expression [96]. This establishes a positive feedback loop that results in marked elevation of both OSCAR and NFATc1 expressions in terminal stages of osteoclast formation [52, 96]. These findings demonstrate a significant role for OSCAR in immune modulation as well as osteoclastogenesis.

In vitro studies demonstrate that addition of OSCAR-Fc to osteoblast-osteoclast cocultures results in the inhibition of osteoclast differentiation with Kim et al. (2002) suggesting that this was due to OSCAR-Fc blocking an osteoblast derived OSCAR ligand binding to OSCAR [14]. This may be in addition to the recent identification of the motifs within fibrillar collagens in the extracellular matrix (ECM) as OSCAR ligands [97]. The importance of OSCAR is further highlighted by the fact that soluble OSCAR (s)OSCAR, in the form of OSCAR-Fc, has also been shown to inhibit osteoclast differentiation from PBMCs in the presence of RANKL, M-CSF, and TGF-β [94].

Costimulatory immune pathways may further increase osteoclast differentiation and activity [81, 82], particularly in chronic inflammatory diseases with an immune component such as in RA, periprosthetic osteolysis, and periodontal disease. In fact, our studies [67, 75] and those of others suggest that deregulation of ITAM-associated molecules contributes to the pathogenesis and severity of rheumatoid arthritis, periodontal disease, periprosthetic osteolysis, and osteoporosis [10, 67, 75, 92, 94, 98, 99].

4.3. Expression of ITAM-Associated Molecules in Chronic Inflammation Induced Localised Osteolysis

We, and others, have demonstrated increased levels of ITAM-related factors, including TREM2, DAP12, OSCAR, and FcRγ in human periprosthetic tissues adjacent to sites of osteolysis [75] and in RA synovial tissues [67, 94]. Additionally, we have observed ITAM-related factors expressed in periodontitis tissue adjacent to bone loss (unpublished observations). Of these factors, soluble and membrane-bound OSCAR have been more extensively assessed in the context of RA and vascular disease (expanded on below).

4.4. Expression of ITAM-Associated Molecules in Rheumatoid Arthritis

We observed markedly higher levels of TREM2, DAP12, OSCAR, and FcRγ in active RA patients compared to synovial tissues from inactive RA, OA, or control healthy joint. Multiple cell types expressed TREM2 including mononuclear cells in lymphoid aggregates and fibroblasts [67]. In OA tissues, TREM2 immunostaining was noticed in monocyte/macrophage-like cells mainly around perivascular areas and on blood vessels (unpublished observations). The positive TREM2 immunostaining on the vasculature was consistent with the finding on expression of TREM2 in endothelial cells that has been documented earlier [100]. TREM2 immunostaining was also occasionally spotted on lymphocyte-like cells in some OA tissues; however, to date there has been no study indicating the expression of TREM2 in lymphocytes but further investigation is needed for confirmation.

Interestingly, DAP12 appeared predominantly associated with macrophage-like cells in the sublining of the synovial tissue, particularly in the macrophage-like cells in the lining of the OA group [67]. More recently, a study by Chen et al. (2014) [101] reported that mRNA expression levels of DAP12 in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of active RA patients were significantly higher in active RA patients than in inactive RA or OA patients. This is consistent with our observations [67] of higher levels of DAP12 protein expressed in the synovium in active RA patients than in inactive RA or OA patients. They also noted that the levels significantly decreased after effective therapy [101].

FcRγ protein associates with fibroblasts and monocytes of the synovial sublining whilst lymphoid aggregates and the vasculature do not express FcRγ [67]. Of note, similar to DAP12, FcRγ was associated with macrophage-like synoviocytes in the synovial lining with some scattered monocytes in the sublining of the OA tissue. This increased DAP12 and FcRγ expression might indicate a role in the pathogenesis of OA but this is yet to be determined [67].

4.5. Soluble and Synovial Tissue Levels of OSCAR in RA

Analysis of human synovial tissue, serum, plasma, and synovial fluid suggests that OSCAR expression is associated with disease activity in RA [67, 94, 98, 99]. Recent studies show that OSCAR protein expression is increased in monocytes from RA patients compared with healthy individuals, correlating with inflammatory disease activity (DAS28) [94]. OSCAR has also been noted to be expressed by mononuclear cells adjacent to synovial microvessels in RA tissues [94]. Consistent with these findings, our immunohistochemical studies show that high levels of OSCAR are associated with mono- and multinuclear cells in active RA tissues compared to tissues from OA and normal patients [67] (Figure 2). Furthermore, semiquantitative analysis confirmed that there is a significant elevation of OSCAR () in active RA synovial tissues compared to osteoarthritis synovial tissues. This increased expression of OSCAR in the synovial tissue of active RA suggests OSCAR regulation by inflammatory cytokines and supports a role for OSCAR in the pathogenesis of RA.

Figure 2: OSCAR positive cells (red) in synovial tissue. (a) OSCAR immunostaining in the lining cells of OA tissues. (b) Mononuclear OSCAR positive cells as indicated by arrow. The magnification was 400x.

A study investigating the clinical, radiological, and synovial immunopathological responses following antirheumatic treatment in RA proposed that high synovial tissue vascularity predicted favorable clinical and radiological responses to treatment [102]. Similar to this, we previously reported the increased OPG staining associated with the vasculature in synovial tissues retrieved from the patient in remission, OA and normal compared with active RA [63]. Furthermore, we have reported increased levels of OPG associated with vasculature following treatment with DMARDS [7].

More recently we have detected increased expression of OSCAR protein associated with the microvasculature of synovial tissue from all inactive and active RA patient tissues (9/9) compared to none in the normal synovial tissue group (0/9) [67]. Importantly, in diseased tissues OSCAR was expressed mostly on the luminal side of the microvasculature, consistent with OSCAR expression by endothelial cells [67, 103]. Our findings suggest that OSCAR is associated with the endothelial cells of the microvasculature and is either produced by endothelial cells or secreted by other cells and bound by the endothelial cells in inflammatory states. The marked reduction in the OSCAR associated with endothelial cells observed in OA and healthy synovial tissues compared with active RA indicates an immune modulatory mechanism [67], which may also signal back to the osteoclasts and regulate bone resorption.

Following observations of OSCAR association with blood vessels the expression of OSCAR was investigated in endothelial cell lines in vitro. Our analysis on bone marrow-derived endothelial cells (BMECs) challenged with IL-1β and TNF-α in vitro demonstrated that the inflammatory cytokines increased OSCAR expressed as both mRNA and secreted and membrane-bound proteins [67]. Together with in vivo observations on synovial tissues and serum levels these studies suggest that inflammatory cytokines in RA regulate cleavage or secretion of sOSCAR from preosteoclasts or the microvasculature.

The regulation by inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α, of OSCAR messenger RNA expression has also been observed in monocytes [94]. Interestingly, levels of OSCAR were found to increase in serum from RA patients following anti-TNF treatment [94]. Of note, these studies did not investigate gene or the release of protein OSCAR by human peripheral blood derived osteoclasts in response to TNF-α in conjunction with RANKL.

4.6. Expression of ITAM-Associated Molecules in Periodontal Disease

To our knowledge, very limited descriptive or functional studies have investigated ITAM factors in periodontitis and normal gingival tissues. An early study however reported that isolated polymorphonuclear neutrophils from GCF of adult periodontitis patients exhibited higher Fc alpha RI and Fc gamma RI levels and lower Fc gamma RIIa and Fc gamma RIIIb levels than peripheral blood polymorphonuclear neutrophils. They found that GCF derived polymorphonuclear neutrophils had a reduced ability to phagocytose and kill IgG1-opsonized P. gingivalis compared to peripheral blood polymorphonuclear neutrophils [104].

Our recent unpublished observations have identified OSCAR colocalizing with TRAP in cells in serial sections of mildly inflamed gingival tissue (Figure 3). Of note, these osteoclast markers are highly expressed in the multinucleated cells on the bone. Similar to the previous observations of expression of ITAM-associated molecules in active and inactive RA patients OSCAR expression was also noted in the microvasculature. Given the similarities in pathogenesis of RA and periodontitis [27] it is worth investigating expression of ITAM factors in periodontitis, gingivitis, and normal gingival tissues.

Figure 3: Expression of osteoclast and vascular-associated molecules in mildly inflamed gingival tissues. (a) TRAP (osteoclast marker), (b) OSCAR C. Von Willebrand factor to identify the microvasculature. The magnification was 200x.
4.7. Expression of ITAM-Associated Molecules in Peri-Prosthetic Osteolysis

We have reported a marked increase in the levels of TREM2 and DAP12, OSCAR, and FcRγ in tissues containing PE particles, compared with OA synovial control tissue when assessed by a semiquantitative scoring system [75]. Furthermore, the observed increased levels of these proteins in peri-prosthetic tissues were consistent with the finding that the corresponding mRNA levels were also increased [75]. Of interest, PE-containing osteoclast-like cells in these tissues were associated with high levels of TREM2 and OSCAR protein and their respective adaptor molecules DAP12 and FcRγ [75] (Figure 4). Consistent with these in vivo observations, PE particles added to human peripheral blood derived osteoclast cells in vitro upregulated ITAM expression [75].

Figure 4: Expression of ITAM-associated molecules in PE-containing tissues from sites of aseptic loosening due to osteolysis. (a) TREM2, (b) DAP12, (c) OSCAR, and (d) FcRγ immunostaining. The magnification was 400x.

It is important to also understand the role synovial fluid may play in modulating regulators of cartilage and bone destruction in the joint. Andersson et al. (2007) found that synovial fluid from patients with OA stimulated the mRNA expression of OSCAR and NFATc1 in mouse calvarial implants in vitro, while mRNA expressions of DAP12 and FcRγ were not affected by synovial fluid from either revision or OA patient groups. The authors suggested that perhaps OSCAR and NFATc1 mRNA might be regulated by soluble factors that are present in OA synovial fluid. However, expression of DAP12 and FcRγ was not regulated in the same way [105]. This is an area that could further be explored.

Considering that inflammation recruits osteoclast precursors and can induce the differentiation and activation of osteoclasts the enhanced expression of ITAM-related molecules in revision tissues could exacerbate bone loss in this disease.

4.8. Potential Role for OSCAR in the Clinic

Previous studies have demonstrated that soluble fusion (OSCAR-fc) protein, comprising the extracellular domain of OSCAR, could inhibit osteoclastogenesis in murine preosteoclast/osteoblast cocultures [14] and PBMCs cultured in the presence of RANKL, M-CSF, and TGF-β [94]. In this situation sOSCAR could compete with OSCAR ligand and reduce OSCAR signalling. The ability of soluble sOSCAR in vitro to impede osteoclast formation may prove useful in inhibiting osteoclast differentiation and may thus prevent bone damage in diseases such as RA.

There is conflicting data as to whether sOSCAR increases in healthy individuals or it increases as a result of erosive activity in RA. Soluble OSCAR has been detected in serum and reported to be higher in healthy compared to RA patients [94, 99]. Serum levels of sOSCAR were shown to inversely correlate with erosion and disease activity [99]. A recent study, however, reported higher levels of sOSCAR in the plasma of RA patients rather than healthy individuals [98]. We have also detected sOSCAR in the synovial fluid of OA and active RA patients with no significant difference between these diseases [67]. We believe that sOSCAR has the potential to act as decoy receptor for OSCAR ligand within the joint and affect osteoclast development in RA. It is possible that successful treatment results in increased cleavage of cell associated OSCAR resulting in increased sOSCAR levels in the joint. In this way sOSCAR regulates osteoclastic bone resorption and is an early marker that predicts joint damage. The biological effect of serum and synovial fluid-derived OSCAR on osteoclastogenesis is yet to be investigated.

Synovitis and erosion are not always linked with some patients having progressive erosive disease despite being in remission and it is unclear what factors drive this [106]. The discordance between clinical inflammatory disease activity and radiological outcomes emphasizes the need for a validated marker of bone damage in conjunction with current clinical parameters that are routinely assessed [107, 108]. The ability to monitor bone erosion will allow the clinician to make important decisions on therapy earlier [109] and reduce structural joint damage [110]. Currently unaddressed RA-induced joint damage affects mobility of patients later in life and predisposes to secondary osteoarthritis [110]. In addition, while we have numerous markers that reflect inflammation and related disease activity there are none that monitor joint erosion, other than X-rays which only indicate damage after it has occurred [111]. Therefore, it is essential that an accurate early marker of joint erosion is identified in order to guide effective treatment modalities in order to protect the joint of arthritic patients.

5. Conclusion

While the significance of ITAM-associated molecules has been largely established in the context of bone biology and an immunological point of view, limited studies have been carried out on osteoclast ITAM-related molecules in human bone pathologies. The increased levels of ITAM factors in inflamed tissues adjacent to sites of localized bone loss in RA, periodontal disease, and periprosthetic osteolysis may prove indicative of the disease progression. Further to this, levels of the soluble factor, OSCAR, in serum or local fluid, may provide us with a potential bone destructive marker and potential target for modulation of bone erosion.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, the Allan and Beryl Stephens grant from Arthritis Australia, and an ASBMR GAP grant. E. Alias was supported by Adelaide Fee Scholarship International of the University of Adelaide and the Malaysian Ministry of Higher Education. The authors would like to thank Tavik Morgenstern for designing the schematic used in Figure one.

References

  1. J. Rho, M. Takami, and Y. Choi, “Osteoimmunology: interactions of the immune and skeletal systems,” Molecules and Cells, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. R. Goldring, P. E. Purdue, T. N. Crotti et al., “Bone remodelling in inflammatory arthritis,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. ii52–ii55, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. K. Sato and H. Takayanagi, “Osteoclasts, rheumatoid arthritis, and osteoimmunology,” Current Opinion in Rheumatology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 419–426, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. A. Kayal, “The role of osteoimmunology in periodontal disease,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2013, Article ID 639368, 12 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. Crotti, M. D. Smith, R. Hirsch et al., “Receptor activator NF κB ligand (RANKL) and osteoprotegerin (OPG) protein expression in periodontitis,” Journal of Periodontal Research, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 380–387, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. T. N. Crotti, M. D. Smith, H. Weedon et al., “Receptor activator NF-κB ligand (RANKL) expression in synovial tissue from patients with rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthropathy, osteoarthritis, and from normal patients: semiquantitative and quantitative analysis,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 61, no. 12, pp. 1047–1054, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. Haynes, T. Crotti, H. Weedon et al., “Modulation of RANKL and osteoprotegerin expression in synovial tissue from patients with rheumatoid arthritis in response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drug treatment and correlation with radiologic outcome,” Arthritis Care and Research, vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 911–920, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. R. Haynes, T. N. Crotti, A. E. Potter et al., “The osteoclastogenic molecules RANKL and RANK are associated with periprosthetic osteolysis,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 902–911, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. A. Holding, D. M. Findlay, R. Stamenkov et al., “The correlation of RANK, RANKL and TNFα expression with bone loss volume and polyethylene wear debris around hip implants,” Biomaterials, vol. 27, no. 30, pp. 5212–5219, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. Jiang, Z. Li, H. Quan et al., “Osteoimmunology in orthodontic tooth movement,” Oral Diseases, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. W. S. Simonet, D. L. Lacey, C. R. Dunstan et al., “Osteoprotegerin: a novel secreted protein involved in the regulation of bone density,” Cell, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 309–319, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. L. Lacey, E. Timms, H.-L. Tan et al., “Osteoprotegerin ligand is a cytokine that regulates osteoclast differentiation and activation,” Cell, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 165–176, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. Y.-Y. Kong, H. Yoshida, I. Sarosi et al., “OPGL is a key regulator of osteoclastogenesis, lymphocyte development and lymph-node organogenesis,” Nature, vol. 397, no. 6717, pp. 315–323, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. N. Kim, M. Takami, J. Rho, R. Josien, and Y. Choi, “A novel member of the leukocyte receptor complex regulates osteoclast differentiation,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 195, no. 2, pp. 201–209, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. Aletaha, T. Neogi, A. J. Silman et al., “2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American college of rheumatology/European League against rheumatism collaborative initiative,” Arthritis & Rheumatism, vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 2569–2581, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. G. H. van de Sande, M. J. H. de Hair, C. van der Leij et al., “Different stages of rheumatoid arthritis: features of the synovium in the preclinical phase,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 772–777, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M.-M. Tǎmaş, E. Filippucci, A. Becciolini et al., “Bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis: ultrasound findings in the early stage of the disease,” Rheumatology, vol. 53, no. 6, Article ID ket484, pp. 1100–1107, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. R. J. Black, L. Spargo, C. Schultz et al., “Decline in hand bone mineral density indicates increased risk of erosive change in early rheumatoid arthritis,” Arthritis Care and Research, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 515–522, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Bromley and D. E. Woolley, “Chondroclasts and osteoclasts at subchondrial sites of erosion in the rheumatoid joint,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 968–975, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. E. M. Gravallese, Y. Harada, J.-T. Wang, A. H. Gorn, T. S. Thornhill, and S. R. Goldring, “Identification of cell types responsible for bone resorption in rheumatoid arthritis and juvenile rheumatoid arthritis,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 152, no. 4, pp. 943–951, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. N. C. Walsh, S. Reinwald, C. A. Manning et al., “Osteoblast function is compromised at sites of focal bone erosion in inflammatory arthritis,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 1572–1585, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. K. S. Kornman, R. C. Page, and M. S. Tonetti, “The host response to the microbial challenge in periodontitis: assembling the players,” Periodontology 2000, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 33–53, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. P. I. Eke, B. A. Dye, L. Wei, G. O. Thornton-Evans, and R. J. Genco, “Prevalence of periodontitis in adults in the united states: 2009 and 2010,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 91, no. 10, pp. 914–920, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. G. P. Harvey, T. R. Fitzsimmons, A. A. S. S. K. Dhamarpatni, C. Marchant, D. R. Haynes, and P. M. Bartold, “Expression of peptidylarginine deiminase-2 and -4, citrullinated proteins and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies in human gingiva,” Journal of Periodontal Research, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 252–261, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. K. Lundberg, N. Wegner, T. Yucel-Lindberg, and P. J. Venables, “Periodontitis in RA-the citrullinated enolase connection,” Nature Reviews Rheumatology, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 727–730, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. D. Cantley, D. R. Haynes, V. Marino, and P. M. Bartold, “Pre-existing periodontitis exacerbates experimental arthritis in a mouse model,” Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 532–541, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. P. M. Bartold, R. I. Marshall, and D. R. Haynes, “Periodontitis and rheumatoid arthritis: a review,” Journal of Periodontology, vol. 76, no. 11, supplement, pp. 2066–2074, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. D. T. Graves, T. Oates, and G. P. Garlet, “Review of osteoimmunology and the host response in endodontic and periodontal lesions,” Journal of Oral Microbiology, vol. 3, article 5304, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. D. W. Howie, “Tissue response in relation to type of wear particles around failed hip arthroplasties,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 337–348, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. H.-G. Willert, H. Bertram, and G. Hans Buchhorn, “Osteolysis in alloarthroplasty of the hip: the role of bone cement fragmentation,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, no. 258, pp. 108–121, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. H.-G. Willert and G. H. Buchhorn, “The significance of wear and material fatigue in loosening of hip prostheses,” Orthopade, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 350–369, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. T. N. Crotti, M. D. Smith, D. M. Findlay et al., “Factors regulating osteoclast formation in human tissues adjacent to peri-implant bone loss: Expression of receptor activator NFκB, RANK ligand and osteoprotegerin,” Biomaterials, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 565–573, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. G. J. Atkins, K. J. Welldon, C. A. Holding, D. R. Haynes, D. W. Howie, and D. M. Findlay, “The induction of a catabolic phenotype in human primary osteoblasts and osteocytes by polyethylene particles,” Biomaterials, vol. 30, no. 22, pp. 3672–3681, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. C. Vermes, K. A. Roebuck, R. Chandrasekaran, J. G. Dobai, J. J. Jacobs, and T. T. Glant, “Particulate wear debris activates protein tyrosine kinases and nuclear factor κB, which down-regulates type I collagen synthesis in human osteoblasts,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1756–1765, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. S. R. Goldring, A. L. Schiller, M. Roelke, C. M. Rourke, D. A. O'Neil, and W. H. Harris, “The synovial-like membrane at the bone-cement interference in loose total hip replacements and its proposed role in bone lysis,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery—Series A, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 575–584, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. A. Vasudevan, E. F. DiCarlo, T. Wright et al., “Cellular response to prosthetic wear debris differs in patients with and without rheumatoid arthritis,” Arthritis and rheumatism, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 1005–1014, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. E. M. Greenfield, Y. Bi, A. A. Ragab, V. M. Goldberg, and R. R. van De Motter, “The role of osteoclast differentiation in aseptic loosening,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. B. Hercus and P. A. Revell, “Phenotypic characteristics of T lymphocytes in the interfacial tissue of aseptically loosened prosthetic joints,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, vol. 12, no. 10–12, pp. 1063–1067, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. I. Roato, D. Caldo, L. D'Amico et al., “Osteoclastogenesis in peripheral blood mononuclear cell cultures of periprosthetic osteolysis patients and the phenotype of T cells localized in periprosthetic tissues,” Biomaterials, vol. 31, no. 29, pp. 7519–7525, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. J. Sandhu, J. E. Waddell, M. Henry, and E. L. Boynton, “The role of T cells in polyethylene particulate induce inflammation,” The Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1794–1799, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. S. Landgraeber, M. Toetsch, C. Wedemeyer et al., “Over-expression of p53/BAK in aseptic loosening after total hip replacement,” Biomaterials, vol. 27, no. 15, pp. 3010–3020, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. W. A. Jiranek, M. Machado, M. Jasty et al., “Production of cytokines around loosened cemented acetabular components: analysis with immunohistochemical techniques and in situ hybridization,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery—Series A, vol. 75, no. 6, pp. 863–879, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. F. F. Buechel, D. Drucker, M. Jasty, W. Jiranek, and W. H. Harris, “Osteolysis around uncemented acetabular components of cobalt-chrome surface replacement hip arthroplasty,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, no. 298, pp. 202–211, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. T. Nakashima and H. Takayanagi, “Osteoimmunology: crosstalk between the immune and bone systems,” Journal of Clinical Immunology, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 555–567, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. W. C. Dougall, M. Glaccum, K. Charrier et al., “RANK is essential for osteoclast and lymph node development,” Genes & Development, vol. 13, no. 18, pp. 2412–2424, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. Y.-Y. Kung, U. Felge, I. Sarosi et al., “Activated T cells regulate bone loss and joint destruction in adjuvant arthritis through osteoprotegerin ligand,” Nature, vol. 402, no. 6759, pp. 304–309, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. H. Takayanagi, S. Kim, T. Koga et al., “Induction and activation of the transcription factor NFATc1 (NFAT2) integrate RANKL signaling in terminal differentiation of osteoclasts,” Developmental Cell, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 889–901, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. H. Hirotani, N. A. Tuohy, J.-T. Woo, P. H. Stern, and N. A. Clipstone, “The calcineurin/nuclear factor of activated T cells signaling pathway regulates osteoclastogenesis in RAW264.7 cells,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 14, pp. 13984–13992, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. N. Ishida, K. Hayashi, M. Hoshijima et al., “Large scale gene expression analysis of osteoclastogenesis in vitro and elucidation of NFAT2 as a key regulator,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 43, pp. 41147–41156, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. K. Matsuo, D. L. Galson, C. Zhao et al., “Nuclear factor of activated T-cells (NFAT) rescues osteoclastogenesis in precursors lacking c-Fos,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 25, pp. 26475–26480, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. M. Matsumoto, M. Kogawa, S. Wada et al., “Essential role of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in cathepsin K gene expression during osteoclastogenesis through association of NFATc1 and PU.1,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 44, pp. 45969–45979, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. Y. Kim, K. Sato, M. Asagiri, I. Morita, K. Soma, and H. Takayanagi, “Contribution of nuclear factor of activated T cells c1 to the transcriptional control of immunoreceptor osteoclast-associated receptor but not triggering receptor expressed by myeloid cells-2 during osteoclastogenesis,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 38, pp. 32905–32913, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. T. N. Crotti, M. Flannery, N. C. Walsh, J. D. Fleming, S. R. Goldring, and K. P. McHugh, “NFATc1 regulation of the human β3 integrin promoter in osteoclast differentiation,” Gene, vol. 372, no. 1-2, pp. 92–102, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. T. N. Crotti, S. M. Sharma, J. D. Fleming et al., “PU.1 and NFATc1 mediate osteoclastic induction of the mouse β3 integrin promoter,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 215, no. 3, pp. 636–644, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. M. Asagiri, K. Sato, T. Usami et al., “Autoamplification of NFATc1 expression determines its essential role in bone homeostasis,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 202, no. 9, pp. 1261–1269, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. T.-Y. Ho, K. Santora, J. C. Chen, A.-L. Frankshun, and C. A. Bagnell, “Effects of relaxin and estrogens on bone remodeling markers, receptor activator of NF-kB ligand (RANKL) and osteoprotegerin (OPG), in rat adjuvant-induced arthritis,” Bone, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1346–1353, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. T. Totsuka, T. Kanai, Y. Nemoto et al., “Rank-rankl signaling pathway is critically involved in the function of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells in chronic colitis,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 182, no. 10, pp. 6079–6087, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. H.-H. Kim, H. S. Shin, H. J. Kwak et al., “RANKL regulates endothelial cell survival through the phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase/Akt signal transduction pathway,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 17, no. 14, pp. 2163–2165, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. K. Loser, A. Mehling, S. Loeser et al., “Epidermal RANKL controls regulatory T-cell numbers via activation of dendritic cells,” Nature Medicine, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 1372–1379, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. L. H. D. van Tuyl, A. E. Voskuyl, M. Boers et al., “Baseline RANKL:OPG ratio and markers of bone and cartilage degradation predict annual radiological progression over 11 years in rheumatoid arthritis,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 69, no. 9, pp. 1623–1628, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. A. R. Pettit, H. Ji, D. Von Stechow et al., “TRANCE/RANKL knockout mice are protected from bone erosion in a serum transfer model of arthritis,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 159, no. 5, pp. 1689–1699, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. S. Kotake, N. Udagawa, M. Hakoda et al., “Activated human T cells directly induce osteoclastogenesis from human monocytes: possible role of T cells in bone destruction in rheumatoid arthritis patients,” Arthritis & Rheumatism, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 1003–1012, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  63. D. R. Haynes, E. Barg, T. N. Crotti et al., “Osteoprotegerin expression in synovial tissue from patients with rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthropathies and osteoarthritis and normal controls,” Rheumatology, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 123–134, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. A. R. Pettit, N. C. Walsh, C. Manning, S. R. Goldring, and E. M. Gravallese, “RANKL protein is expressed at the pannus-bone interface at sites of articular bone erosion in rheumatoid arthritis,” Rheumatology, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 1068–1076, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. H. Takayanagi, H. Iizuka, T. Juji et al., “Involvement of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand/osteoclast differentiation factor in osteoclastogenesis from synoviocytes in rheumatoid arthritis,” Arthritis & Rheumatism, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 259–269, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  66. S. Monticelli and A. Rao, “NFAT1 and NFAT2 are positive regulators of IL-4 gene transcription,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 2971–2978, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  67. T. N. Crotti, A. A. S. S. K. Dharmapatni, E. Alias, A. C. W. Zannettino, M. D. Smith, and D. R. Haynes, “The immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM)-related factors are increased in synovial tissue and vasculature of rheumatoid arthritic joints,” Arthritis Research & Therapy, vol. 14, no. 6, article R245, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. N. J. Horwood, V. Kartsogiannis, J. M. W. Quinn, E. Romas, T. J. Martin, and M. T. Gillespie, “Activated T lymphocytes support osteoclast formation in vitro,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 265, no. 1, pp. 144–150, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. T. Kawai, T. Matsuyama, Y. Hosokawa et al., “B and T lymphocytes are the primary sources of RANKL in the bone resorptive lesion of periodontal disease,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 169, no. 3, pp. 987–998, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. G. N. Belibasakis, G. Emingil, B. Saygan, O. Turkoglu, G. Atilla, and N. Bostanci, “Gene expression of transcription factor NFATc1 in periodontal diseases,” APMIS, vol. 119, no. 3, pp. 167–172, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. J. Chiba, H. E. Rubash, and Y. Iwaki, “The characterization of cytokines in the interface tissue obtained from failed cementless total hip arthroplasty with and without femoral osteolysis,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, no. 300, pp. 304–312, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. S. Stea, M. Visentin, D. Granchi et al., “Cytokines and osteolysis around total hip prostheses,” Cytokine, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1575–1579, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. D. R. Haynes, T. N. Crotti, and H. Zreiqat, “Regulation of osteoclast activity in peri-implant tissues,” Biomaterials, vol. 25, no. 20, pp. 4877–4885, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. A. Sabokbar, O. Kudo, and N. A. Athanasou, “Two distinct cellular mechanisms of osteoclast formation and bone resorption in periprosthetic osteolysis,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 73–80, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. E. Alias, A. S. S. K. Dharmapatni, A. C. Holding et al., “Polyethylene particles stimulate expression of ITAM-related molecules in peri-implant tissues and when stimulating osteoclastogenesis in vitro,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 3104–3112, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. E. Merck, B. De Saint-Vis, M. Scuiller et al., “Fc receptor γ-chain activation via hOSCAR induces survival and maturation of dendritic cells and modulates Toll-like receptor responses,” Blood, vol. 105, no. 9, pp. 3623–3632, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. E. Merck, C. Gaillard, D. M. Gorman et al., “OSCAR is an FcRγ-associated receptor that is expressed by myeloid cells and is involved in antigen presentation and activation of human dendritic cells,” Blood, vol. 104, no. 5, pp. 1386–1395, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. K. Nemeth, M. Schoppet, N. Al-Fakhri et al., “The role of osteoclast-associated receptor in osteoimmunology,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 186, no. 1, pp. 13–18, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. A. Mócsai, M. B. Humphrey, J. A. G. van Ziffle et al., “The immunomodulatory adapter proteins DAP12 and Fc receptor γ-chain (FcRγ) regulate development of functional osteoclasts through the Syk tyrosine kinase,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 16, pp. 6158–6163, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. M. B. Humphrey, L. L. Lanier, and M. C. Nakamura, “Role of ITAM-containing adapter proteins and their receptors in the immune system and bone,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 208, no. 1, pp. 50–65, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. H. Takayanagi, “Mechanistic insight into osteoclast differentiation in osteoimmunology,” Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 170–179, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. T. Koga, M. Inui, K. Inoue et al., “Costimulatory signals mediated by the ITAM motif cooperate with RANKL for bone homeostasis,” Nature, vol. 428, no. 6984, pp. 758–763, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. S. Ishikawa, N. Arase, T. Suenaga et al., “Involvement of FcRγ in signal transduction of osteoclast-associated receptor (OSCAR),” International Immunology, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 1019–1025, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. K. Kim, J. H. Kim, J. Lee et al., “Nuclear factor of activated T cells c1 induces osteoclast-associated receptor gene expression during tumor necrosis factor-related activation-induced cytokine-mediated osteoclastogenesis,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 42, pp. 35209–35216, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. Y. Numasawa, C. Yamaura, S. Ishihara et al., “Nasu-Hakola disease with a splicing mutation of TREM2 in a Japanese family,” European Journal of Neurology, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 1179–1183, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. J. Paloneva, T. Manninen, G. Christman et al., “Mutations in two genes encoding different subunits of a receptor signaling complex result in an identical disease phenotype,” American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 656–662, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. J. Paloneva, J. Mandelin, A. Kiialainen et al., “DAP12/TREM2 deficiency results in impaired osteoclast differentiation and osteoporotic features,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 198, no. 4, pp. 669–675, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. B. Melchior, A. E. Garcia, B.-K. Hsiung et al., “Dual induction of TREM2 and tolerance-related transcript, Tmem176b, in amyloid transgenic mice: implications for vaccine-based therapies for Alzheimer's disease,” ASN Neuro, vol. 2, no. 3, Article ID e00037, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. J. Paloneva, M. Kestilä, J. Wu et al., “Loss-of-function mutations in TYROBP (DAP12) result in a presenile dementia with bone cysts,” Nature Genetics, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 357–361, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. T. Kaifu, J. Nakahara, M. Inui et al., “Osteopetrosis and thalamic hypomyelinosis with synaptic degeneration in DAP12-deficient mice,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 323–332, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. M. Cella, C. Buonsanti, C. Strader, T. Kondo, A. Salmaggi, and M. Colonna, “Impaired differentiation of osteoclasts in TREM-2-deficient individuals,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 198, no. 4, pp. 645–651, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. G. S. Kim, J.-M. Koh, J. S. Chang et al., “Association of the OSCAR promoter polymorphism with BMD in postmenopausal women,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 1342–1348, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. K. Otero, M. Shinohara, H. Zhao et al., “TREM2 and beta-catenin regulate bone homeostasis by controlling the rate of osteoclastogenesis,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 188, no. 6, pp. 2612–2621, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  94. S. Herman, R. B. Müller, G. Krönke et al., “Induction of osteoclast-associated receptor, a key osteoclast costimulation molecule, in rheumatoid arthritis,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 3041–3050, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. E. Merck, C. Gaillard, M. Scuiller et al., “Ligation of the FcRγ chain-associated human osteoclast-associated receptor enhances the proinflammatory responses of human monocytes and neutrophils,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 176, no. 5, pp. 3149–3156, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. K. Kim, J. H. Kim, J. Lee et al., “Nuclear factor of activated T cells c1 induces osteoclast-associated receptor gene expression during tumor necrosis factor-related activation-induced cytokine-mediated osteoclastogenesis,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 42, pp. 35209–35216, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. A. D. Barrow, N. Raynal, T. L. Andersen et al., “OSCAR is a collagen receptor that costimulates osteoclastogenesis in DAP12-deficient humans and mice,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 121, no. 9, pp. 3505–3516, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. N. Ndongo-Thiam, G. de Sallmard, J. Kastrup, and P. Miossec, “Levels of soluble osteoclast-associated receptor (sOSCAR) in rheumatoid arthritis: Link to disease severity and cardiovascular risk,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 1276–1277, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. S. Zhao, Y.-Y. Guo, N. Ding, L.-L. Yang, and N. Zhang, “Changes in serum levels of soluble osteoclast-associated receptor in human rheumatoid arthritis,” Chinese Medical Journal, vol. 124, no. 19, pp. 3058–3060, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. L. C. Chen, J. D. Laskin, M. K. Gordon, and D. L. Laskin, “Regulation of TREM expression in hepatic macrophages and endothelial cells during acute endotoxemia,” Experimental and Molecular Pathology, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 145–155, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. D.-Y. Chen, L. Yao, Y.-M. Chen et al., “A potential role of myeloid DAP12-associating lectin (MDL)-1 in the regulation of inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis patients,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 1, Article ID e86105, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  102. A. R. Pettit, H. Weedon, M. Ahern et al., “Association of clinical, radiological and synovial immunopathological responses to anti-rheumatic treatment in rheumatoid arthritis,” Rheumatology, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 1243–1255, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  103. C. Goettsch, M. Rauner, K. Sinningen et al., “The Osteoclast-Associated Receptor (OSCAR) is a novel receptor regulated by oxidized low-density lipoprotein in human endothelial cells,” Endocrinology, vol. 152, no. 12, pp. 4915–4926, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. T. Kobayashi, K. Yamamoto, N. Sugita et al., “Effective in vitro clearance of Porphyromonas gingivalis by Fcα receptor I (CD89) on gingival crevicular neutrophils,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 2935–2942, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. M. K. Andersson, P. Lundberg, A. Ohlin et al., “Effects on osteoclast and osteoblast activities in cultured mouse calvarial bones by synovial fluids from patients with a loose joint prosthesis and from osteoarthritis patients,” Arthritis Research and Therapy, vol. 9, no. 1, article R18, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. F. McQueen and E. Naredo, “The “disconnect” between synovitis and erosion in rheumatoid arthritis: a result of treatment or intrinsic to the disease process itself?” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 241–244, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. E. Villeneuve and B. Haraoui, “Uncoupling of disease activity and structural damage. Does it matter clinically?” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 1–2, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. E. M. Ruderman, “Defining the value of structural inhibition: is low-dose etanercept inferior to the standard dose?” Rheumatology, vol. 51, no. 12, Article ID kes263, pp. 2118–2119, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. E. M. Shanahan, M. Smith, L. Roberts-Thomson, A. Esterman, and M. Ahern, “Influence of rheumatoid arthritis on work participation in Australia,” Internal Medicine Journal, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 166–173, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  110. A. Finckh, N. Bansback, C. A. Marra et al., “Treatment of very early rheumatoid arthritis with symptomatic therapy, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, or biologic agents: a cost-effectiveness analysis,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 151, no. 9, pp. 612–621, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  111. J. S. Smolen and D. Aletaha, “Forget personalised medicine and focus on abating disease activity,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 3–6, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus