Journal of Immunology Research

Journal of Immunology Research / 2017 / Article
Special Issue

Immune System and Chronic Diseases

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 |Article ID 4218254 | 13 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4218254

Natural Killer Cells in the Orchestration of Chronic Inflammatory Diseases

Academic Editor: Margarete D. Bagatini
Received04 Oct 2016
Revised04 Jan 2017
Accepted18 Jan 2017
Published27 Mar 2017

Abstract

Inflammation, altered immune cell phenotype, and functions are key features shared by diverse chronic diseases, including cardiovascular, neurodegenerative diseases, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and cancer. Natural killer cells are innate lymphoid cells primarily involved in the immune system response to non-self-components but their plasticity is largely influenced by the pathological microenvironment. Altered NK phenotype and function have been reported in several pathological conditions, basically related to impaired or enhanced toxicity. Here we reviewed and discussed the role of NKs in selected, different, and “distant” chronic diseases, cancer, diabetes, periodontitis, and atherosclerosis, placing NK cells as crucial orchestrator of these pathologic conditions.

1. Introduction

Inflammation is now considered a crucial hallmark of chronic disorders, including cardiovascular [1], neurodegenerative diseases [24], diabetes [5, 6], metabolic syndrome [7, 8], and cancer [911]. Inflammation acts as a relevant orchestrator in their insurgence, development, and progression [1, 2, 6, 10]. Inflammatory cells, which comprise cells from innate ad adaptive immunity, are characterized by different phenotype and functions, which involve direct (by contact) or distant (by soluble factors) interaction with their target cells [1214]. Immune cells, form either innate or adaptive immunity, given their cellular plasticity, have been reported to acquire an altered phenotype upon different stimuli. This has been described for diverse immune cell type, including macrophages (M), neutrophils (N), myeloid-derive-suppressor cells (MDSC), dendritic cells (DC), natural killer (NK) cells, and T cells [1214]. Immune cell altered functions include attenuation of targeting/killing activities, tolerogenic/immunosuppressive behaviour, and the acquisition of proangiogenic functions. These alterations, occurring at both tissue levels and systemically, are finely tuned by the (chronic) pathological environment. Here, we focused on NKs as key orchestrator in inflammatory chronic diseases, such cancer, type 1 diabetes, periodontitis, and atherosclerosis. The aim was to discuss how such very different pathologies, with diverse aetiology and photogenic mechanisms, share a common and relevant hallmark, such inflammation, dissecting whether NK cells act as crucial orchestrators in the induction and progression of the conditions selected.

NKs are innate lymphoid cells, primarily involved in the host defence against infection and in the process of tumour immunosurveillance. A part from their crucial role in those processes, NK cells are involved in the graft-versus-host disease, the regulation of haematopoiesis, and exert regulatory effects on the adaptive immune cell counterpart [15]. Virus infected and tumour transforming cells share the feature of low/null expression of the MHC-I molecule, representing one of the mechanisms through which NK cells are able to recognize target/non-self-cells. Nevertheless, this mechanism alone does not trigger cytotoxicity, unless it is combined with the altered expression of other molecules on the target cell surface, acting as activatory ligands. NK cells are equipped with surface receptors that trigger cell activation (immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs (ITAM)) or inhibition (immune tyrosine-based inhibitory motifs (ITIM)) [16]. NK cells also directly contribute to adaptive immune responses, interacting with DCs and by triggering T cell responses. Induction of DC maturation to produce TNF-α and IL-12 and upregulation of costimulatory ligands are triggered by NK cells [17]. Moreover, NK cells proliferate and acquire cytotoxic activity and the capacity to produce IFN-γ through the interaction with DCs [18]. Apart from activation of other cells of innate immunity, NK cells also enhance induction of CD8+ T cell responses that is influenced by NK-released IFN-γ, which promotes antigen processing and presentation to T cells and T helper type 1 (Th1) cell polarization [19]. Two major circulating human NK cell subsets have been characterized based on the expression of surface antigens: CD56, an isoform of the human neural cell adhesion molecule, and CD16, the low-affinity Fc receptor necessary for the antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). Peripheral NK cells are predominantly CD16+ cytotoxic NK cells acting mainly through the release of perforin, a membrane pore-forming toxin, and granzyme which activates the apoptotic cascade on target cells. However, approximately 5% of circulating NK cells show a CD16 phenotype. These cells can produce high levels of some cytokines. Upon activation, CD16 NK cells release IFN-γ and TNF-α, and they kill target cells more efficiently [20]. Within the developing decidua, a third NK subset is found, the decidual NK cell (dNK). dNK cells display a CD16 phenotype [21] and are closely linked with vascularization of the decidua in both humans and mice. dNK cells physiologically produce VEGF, PlGF, and IL-8, are poorly cytotoxic, and are associated with the induction of CD4+ T regulatory (Treg) cells [22, 23] (Figure 1).

2. Natural Killer Cells and Cancer

Strong evidences suggest that the presence of inflammatory cells within the tumour microenvironment (TME) plays a crucial role in the development and/or progression of human cancers [10, 12, 2427]. Among the host-dependent biological features of the tumour hallmarks, defined by Hanahan and Weinberg [28], there are “evading immune destruction” and “tumour-promoting inflammation,” which together with the immune orchestration of angiogenesis point out the key role of the immune system in neoplastic diseases [9, 10, 12, 24].

Alterations in NK cell activity have been described in different type of cancer and are associated with the induction of a tolerogenic and less/poor cytotoxic functions with decreased expression of the activatory receptor NKG2D, altered degranulation, and release of perforin and granzyme. Recently, Bruno et al. identified a new NK cell subset in tissue and peripheral blood of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, termed, respectively, tumour infiltrating (TINKs) and tumour associated (TANKs) NKs, which are able to promote angiogenesis [29, 30]. NSCLC TINK/TANKs are characterized by a decidual like phenotype CD16IL-8+IFN-, able to promote endothelial cell migration and induction of capillary-like structures [29, 30].

Several TME released components, including TGF-β, hypoxia, and adenosine, mostly shared with the decidual tissues, are implicated in NK cell response against tumours [31] (Figure 2).

TGF-β is one of the numerous TME factors involved in the induction of immune cell polarization [32] and is expressed at high levels both in the tumour microenvironment and in the decidua [29]. During carcinogenesis, TGF-β acts as a tumour suppressor, by inhibiting tumour cell replication and favouring apoptosis [33, 34], while at later stages of tumour progression it exerts protumourigenic effects that include tumour survival, induction of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), enhanced tumour invasion, and immunosuppressive and proangiogenic activities [3234]. TGF-β has been found to polarize the CD16+ peripheral NK cells towards a decidual like phenotype, defined as CD16 and KIR+ CD9+ CD49a+ [29, 3537]. TGF-β has been shown to inhibit CD16 mediated human NK cell IFN-γ production and ADCC though SMAD3 [36]. Bruno et al. demonstrated that TGF-β significantly contributes in the induction of the angiogenic-switch of NK cells from healthy individuals [30], promoting the induction of the TINK/TANK CD16IL-8+INF phenotype in vitro.

A hypoxic microenvironment is another common feature shared between the decidua and the TME [38, 39]. A combination of TGF-β hypoxia and 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine, a demethylating agent, has been found to convert FACS sorted peripheral blood CD16+NK cells into dNKs, characterized by low cytotoxicity and high expression levels of VEGF, the CD9 dNK marker, and KIRs [36].

Adenosine is a soluble immunomodulatory molecule acting through adenosine receptors expressed on diverse immune cell type, including NK cells [40, 41]. Up to 20-fold increases in the adenosine content in extracellular fluid of solid carcinomas have been reported [42]. Adenosine accumulation is partially associated with hypoxia and its release in the extracellular environment and can impair NK cell cytolytic activities by decreasing TNF-α secretion (following IL-2 stimulation), decreasing cytotoxic granule exocytosis, and attenuating perforin and Fas ligand-mediated cytotoxic activity as far as cytokine release. Most of these effects are attributed to stimulation of the cyclic adenosine monophosphate/protein kinase A (PKA) pathway, following the binding of adenosine to A2A receptors on NK cells [43].

Recently, great interests arise on tumour released vesicles, including exosomes, in shaping immune cell response [44, 45]. Exosomes are small (40 to 110 nm) membrane vesicles of endocytic origin which are actively secreted from several cell types. Exosome content includes a variety of biologically active molecules such as proteins, mRNAs, and miRNAs reflecting the cell of origin. They probably mediate a range of local and systematic functions, including immune stimulation or suppression, cell-to-cell communication, delivery of proteins, and genetic material, including miRNA, tumour immune escape, and tumour cell communication [46, 47]. Tumour derived exosomes appear to regulate NK cells impairing their killing activity by downregulating perforin/granzyme production and/or NKG2D ligand expression [48, 49]. Exosome release could explain the effects of tumours on the polarization of peripheral NK cells towards TANK phenotype. The NKG2D/NKG2DL system plays an important role in tumour immune surveillance [42, 48, 49]. There are convincing evidences that exosomes derived from diverse cancer cell lines, including mesothelioma, breast, and prostate cancer cells, express NKG2D ligands, and thereby downregulate NKG2D expression on NK cells and CD8+ T cells, resulting in impaired cytotoxic effector functions [4850]. It has also been shown that leukaemia/lymphoma T and B cells secrete NKG2D ligand-expressing exosomes with the ability to impair the cytotoxic potency of NK and T cells from healthy donors [44, 45].

Recently, STAT5 has been proposed as a key regulator in NK cells and demonstrated that STAT5 acts as a molecular switch from tumour surveillance to tumour promotion [39]. Consistent with its function as the major STAT protein downstream of IL-7, IL-2, and IL-15, Gotthardt et al. reported STAT5 role in tumour angiogenesis showing that Stat5Δ/ΔNcr1--Vav-Bcl2 mice displayed an increased tumour growth compared with wild-type mice [51]. In addition, production of VEGF by NK cells is higher in STAT5-deficient mice compared with wt-mice. To elucidate the role of VEGF production in NKp46+ cells, Gotthardt and colleagues established Ncr1- mice, characterized by NKp46+VEGF cells. In v-abl+ tumour, RMA-S, and A-MuLV-induced leukaemia tumour models, they showed a significant reduction of tumour burden and fewer CD31+ blood vessels in tumours.

3. Natural Killer Cells in Type 1 Diabetes

Type 1 diabetes (T1D), an autoimmune disease characterized by almost complete beta cell destruction and hyperglycaemia, accounts for only about 5–10% of all cases of diabetes, whereas its incidence is dramatically increasing worldwide over the last 50 years [52]. Different immune cells, such macrophages and dendritic and T cells, have been suggested to play crucial roles in type 1 diabetes pathogenesis [5355]. The contribution of autoreactive T cells to the destruction of pancreatic β cells as a consequence of an immunologically mediated destruction of the pancreatic tissues has been proposed as the key pathogenic mechanisms in type 1 diabetes [56, 57]. Nevertheless, diverse inflammatory cells, from both innate and adaptive immunity, interact with the pancreatic parenchyma, supporting the overall inflammatory state in T1D. NKs cells represent the major source of IFN-γ, a Th1 proinflammatory cytokine acting as a master regulator of different immune cell response. High release of IFN-γ within the pancreatic tissues in T1D patients may significantly contribute to the excessive, uncontrolled, and unresolved autoimmune response mediated by autoreactive T cells. While NK cell response against autologous pancreatic islet has been reported in vitro [58], contrasting results have been reported in in vivo models.

Two in vivo studies correlate NK cells to diabetes progression. In the first study (Figure 3(a)), an in vivo model of coxsackievirus B4- (CVB4-) induced diabetes was employed, showing that NK antiviral defence, raised by beta cells in response to IFNs, resulted in a reduced permissiveness to infection and subsequent natural killer (NK) cell-dependent death [59]. Another in vivo study (Figure 3(b)), using a T cell receptor transgenic model where T1D was induced via anti-CTLA-4 mAb treatment, revealed that higher frequency of NK cells exited in aggressive insulitis, resulting in b-islet cell destruction [60].

Conversely, there are several reports supporting a protective role exerted by NK cells, in NOD mice undergoing complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA). In this work, NOD/SCID mice immunized with CFA recover its protective effects when CD3DX5+ NKs were adoptively transferred into animal recipients, by downregulating autoreactive T cell response [61] (Figure 3(c)).

Whether the murine model employed is relevant for the NK cell behaviour detected in the context of T1D is still debated. For example, NOD mice are characterized by an unusual genetic composition in the genomic regions that influence NK cell activity.

The NKG2D activatory receptor has been demonstrated to be overexpressed in NOD NKs due to the overexpression of its Rae-1 ligand. Further, diverse NK cell inhibitory receptors have been found to be differentially expressed in NOD mice as compared to C57BL/6 control animals [62]. Altogether, these genetic peculiarities may explain the low NKs activity detected in NOD mice [62, 63].

Moving to humans (Figure 3(d)), contrasting results have been reported as well (Figure 2). Most of them documented low number of circulating NK cells in T1D patients [6466] or a functional altered state [67, 68]. The major concern regarding these studies is that, even if NK cells were directly isolated from T1D patients, the detection of functional alteration was performed by assessing NK cell cytolysis on K562 tumour cells.

Rodacki et al. investigated the frequency and activatory state of peripheral blood NK cells in individuals with T1D at different stages (recent versus long-standing onset) [69, 70]. No significant difference between the activatory state, as detected by IFN-γ and perforin release, was observed between NK cells derived from either recent or long-standing T1D patients. In contrast, lower expression of the NCR NKp30 and NKp40 was detected in NK cell isolated from long-standing type 1 as compared with control subjects. Further, gene expression analysis revealed that type 1 diabetic patients display an increased frequency of KIR gene haplotypes, including the activating KIR2DS3 gene, with a genetic interaction between the KIR and HLA complexes [69, 70].

4. Natural Killer Cells in Periodontitis

Periodontitis, defined as the inflammation of the periodontium involving the supporting tissues of the teeth, affects as much as 80% of the middle-aged population; by comparison, the prevalence of aggressive periodontitis reaches up to 1–1.5% [71].

The role of NK cells in periodontitis has been poorly investigated; however decreased Th cells and upregulation of NK cells during CP have been documented [72].

The role of NKs in periodontitis represents a still debated issue. Indeed, contrasting results have been reported by using human specimens. While some of them showed a relationship between NK number, phenotype, and periodontal state [7376], others reported no significant correlation [73, 77].

Relevant increase of CD57 NK cells has been observed by Fujita et al. and related to periodontal diseases progression as a consequence of an unresolved immune response within periodontal tissues [7376].

Contrast studies conducted by Fujita et al. and Cobb et al. revealed relatively low numbers of natural killer cells in chronic gingivitis and periodontitis samples, as compared to healthy subjects’ correlation [73, 77].

Conversely, in vitro studies have focused on the interaction between NK cells and the main bacterial species involved in the pathogenesis of periodontitis (Figure 4), like A. actinomycetemcomitans, P. gingivalis, and F. nucleatum [78].

Direct recognition of Fusobacterium nucleatum, a gram-negative anaerobe microorganism ubiquitous to the oral cavity [79], by the NK cell natural cytotoxicity receptor NKp46, has been reported to aggravate periodontal disease [78] (Figure 4(A)).

Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, a gram-negative bacterium which has been associated with severe oral infections [80], has been shown to elicit rapid gamma interferon responses by natural killer cells, via dendritic cell stimulation [81] (Figure 4(B)). Increased type 1 cytokine production by both dendritic cells and NK cells, following exposition to P. gingivalis, has been described, resulting in increased P. gingivalis-specific IgG2 [81] (Figure 4(C)). Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, a gram-negative anaerobic bacterium strongly associated with localized aggressive periodontitis [82], has been reported to indirectly induces CD2-like receptor activating cytotoxic cells (CRACC) on NK cells, via activation of dendritic cells and subsequent IL-12 signalling [83]. CRACC induction was reported to be more significantly pronounced in aggressive than chronic periodontitis and positively correlated with periodontal disease severity, subgingival levels of specific periodontal pathogens, and NK cell activation in vivo [83] (Figure 4(D)).

Other relevant mechanisms driving NK cell contribution to periodontitis involve ncr1 receptor recognition of still unknown ligands on F. nucleatum surface. This interaction resulted in TNF-α secretion that on one hand leads to tissue damage by stimulating prostaglandin E2 release from monocytes and fibroblasts, secretion of metalloproteinases that degrade extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, and on the other hand induces osteoclast differentiation and activation by increasing RANKL expression and the suppression of osteoprotegerin, a cytokine receptor that belongs to tumour necrosis factor (TNF) receptor superfamily expression in osteoblasts, resulting in alveolar bone resorption [78] (Figure 4(E)).

Several conditions associated with periodontitis have been related to alteration in NK cells cytotoxicity. A part from those related to bacterial infections, T2DM [67], smoking habits [84] have been included as related conditions.

Fanconi anemia (FA), an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by progressive pancytopenia and congenital malformation of the skeleton [85], periodontitis, and gingivitis, represents common inflammatory states in patients with FA [85]. Natural killer (NK) cell numbers and function have been reported to be decreased in some FA patients and this was associated with impairment in the differentiation process of the NK cells subsets [85, 86]. Myers et al. showed perforin and granzyme reduced content in NK cells from children with FA as compared to controls [87].

Zeidel et al. reported that smokers without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) showed impaired NK cytotoxic activity in peripheral blood and alteration in systemic production of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines [84].

A study performed on Papillon-Lefèvre syndrome (PLS), an autosomal recessive disorder that exited in aggressive periodontitis [88], revealed NK cell anergy, as compared to healthy subjects with impairment of NK cell cytotoxic function [89].

5. Natural Killer Cells in Atherosclerosis

Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting elastic and large muscular arteries that are characterized by lesions containing cholesterol, immune cells, smooth muscle cells, and necrotic cores. Macrophages, dendritic cells, and T cells represent the major immune cells populations within developing lesions, even if other immune cell components are involved, including NK cells [90]. Indeed, NKs have been observed within atherosclerotic plaques in humans as far as in mice [91, 92] and it has been demonstrated that in advanced atherosclerotic lesions they mostly localized in the necrotic core adjacent tissues, deep within plaques, and in shoulder regions [90].

It has been suggested that several cytokines and chemokines within lesions may be directly involved in NK cell recruitment towards atherosclerotic plaque. Among all, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) [93] as well as fractalkine (CX3CL1) has been shown as relevant cytokines able to enhance NK cell migration and activation resulting in an increased IFN-γ release [94]. In addition, IL-15, IL-12, IL-18, and IFN-α, which represent major NK cell chemoattractants, have been shown to promote atherogenic process, potentially activating NK cells, or promoting their crosstalk with other immune cells, including DC and monocytes/macrophages [9597] (Figure 5(a)). NKs have been shown to participate in atherosclerosis via activatory receptors that recognize MHC-I molecules (MICA and MICB) [98] and by releasing IFN-γ, a proinflammatory cytokine [99]. In this context, it was demonstrated that oxidized low-density lipoprotein (LDL) can promote NK/dendritic cell crosstalk by activating the CD48-2B4 axis and inducing an increased production of IFN-γ by NKs [100] (Figure 5(a)).

To specifically confirm that NK cells infiltrate the vessel wall and contribute to atherosclerotic promotion and lesion development, several in vivo models have been employed. Whitman et al. create a chimeric atherosclerosis-susceptible LDL receptor null (ldl-r−/−) mouse model also characterized by the impairment of NK cell functionality through the expression of a transgene encoding for Ly49A. They demonstrated that, even if no difference in either serum total cholesterol concentrations or lipoprotein cholesterol distribution was observed between the two groups of mice, in Ly49A transgenic group the deficiency of functional NK cells significantly reduced the size of atherosclerosis by 70% in cross-sectional analysis of the aortic root and by 38% in the intimal surface of the aortic arch [92, 99] (Figure 5(b)).

Selathurai et al. demonstrated that treatments with anti-Asialo-GM1 in ApoE(−/−) mice resulted in NK cells depletion without affecting other lymphocytes ratios, associated with reduced atherosclerosis (Figure 5(c)). These effects have been shown to be independent from plasma lipids. Moreover NKs isolated from mouse spleens for adoptive transfer into lymphocyte-deficient ApoE(−/−)Rag2(−/−)IL2rg(−/−) mice confirmed the proatherogenic activity of NK cells. Further, the transfer of IFN-γ-deficient NK cells, but not granzyme B and perforin-deficient NK cells, resulted in an increased lesion size in the lymphocyte-deficient ApoE(−/−) mice as in wild-type NK cells. Necrotic core was increased by wild-type NK cells, whereas no changes were observed with perforin- and granzyme B-deficient NK cell transfer [98] (Figure 5(d)).

Cheng et al. showed that combined B, T, and NK cell deficiency accelerates atherosclerosis in BALB/c mice, demonstrating the impact of lymphocytes, including NKs, on lipoprotein metabolism along with the relevant contribution of lymphocyte subsets in plaque composition in atherosclerosis [101].

Recent studies have suggested that not only might the presence of NKs be considered in atherosclerosis progression, but also more importantly their ability to influence other immune cells should be evaluated. Several evidences demonstrated that NKs within atherosclerotic plaque are activated by dendritic cells. NK-released cytokines are able in turn to promote DC maturation, leading to an exacerbation inflammatory response. NK/DC crosstalk might be envisaged as a potential interaction occurring within atherosclerotic lesions, which might worsen disease progression [102] (Figure 5(a)). In fact, the crosstalk between activated dendritic cells/macrophages and NK cells induces IFN-γ release by NK cells that in turn promotes metalloproteinases (MMPs) secretion from cDCs and M. Activated M produce TNF-α increasing enhance endothelial cell adhesion molecules and MMPs can damage the extracellular matrix leading to atherosclerotic plaque destabilization [102] (Figure 5(a)).

Indirect evidence that NK cells might contribute to atherosclerotic disease is also provided by clinical observations in atherosclerotic patients. Recently, in a cohort of 124 patients it has been demonstrated that increased NK numbers were observed in the arm of the study including those patients with complications, suggesting NK cell direct contribution in atherosclerosis progression [103]. Similarly, in elderly atherosclerotic patients, an increased number of total circulating NKs characterized by an impaired cytotoxicity were shown [104]. According to these evidences, a significant reduction of NK cells and a concomitant loss of NK cell function in terms of cytolytic activity were also found in patients with unstable coronary artery disease (CAD) [105].

6. Conclusion

The contribution of natural killer cells to inflammatory disease insurgence and progression represent an intriguing topic for both basic scientists and clinicians. It is now clear that immune cell plasticity within the pathological microenvironment acts not only at local tissue but also at systemic levels. Several studies performed in different and distant pathologies like cancer, diabetes, and dental disorders that share an inflammatory state as a crucial hallmark showed altered NK cell activity at both local and systemic levels. This will be crucial to propose NK cells as potential circulating biomarkers to early detect diverse syndrome and/or predict further outcome.

Some studies, here discussed, supported the evidence that altered NK cell activities (enhanced/uncontrolled cytolysis versus impaired cytolytic functions) are associated with protective or deleterious effects. This knowledge suggests that further studies, requiring proper animal models and translation into human, are necessary to clarify the contribution of NK cells to the progression of inflammatory-related pathologies, aiming at identifying potential modulators able to shape NK cells, according to the pathological context. Finally, considering their direct and indirect (crosstalk with other arms on innate and adaptive immunity) contribution to inflammatory conditions, NK cells can be placed as relevant orchestrators in chronic diseases.

Abbreviations

ADCC:Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity
A-MuLV:Abelson murine leukaemia virus
CD:Cluster of differentiation
CFA:Complete Freund’s adjuvant
COPD:Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
CP:Chronic periodontitis
CRACC:CD2-like receptor activating cytotoxic cells
CTLA:Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen
CVB4:Coxsackievirus B4
CX3CL1:Fractalkine
DC:Dendritic cells
dNK:Decidual NK cell
ECM:Extracellular matrix
FA:Fanconi anemia
FACS:Fluorescence-activated cell sorting
HLA:Human leukocyte antigen
IFN:Interferon
IL:Interleukin
ITAM:Immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs
ITIM:Immune tyrosine-based inhibitory motifs
KIR:Killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor
LDL:Low-density lipoprotein
Ly49A:Killer cell lectin-like receptor subfamily A
M:Macrophages
MΦ:Naïve macrophages
MCP-1:Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1
MDSC:Myeloid-derive-suppressor cells
MHC:Major histocompatibility complex
MICA:MHC class I polypeptide-related sequence A
MICB:MHC class I polypeptide-related sequence B
MMPs:Metalloproteinases
miRNA:Micro-RNA
mRNA:Messenger RNA
N:Neutrophils
NCR:Natural cytotoxicity receptors
NK:Natural killer
NKG:Natural killer group
NOD:Nonobese diabetic
NOD/SCID:Nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficiency
NSCLC:Non-small-cell lung cancer
PKA:Protein kinase A
PlGF:Placental growth factor
PLS:Papillon-Lefèvre syndrome
Rae:Retinoic acid early inducible
RANKL:Receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand
RMA-S:Rejected an MHC class I-deficient tumour cell line
SMAD:Small mother against decapentaplegic
STAT:Signal transducers and activators of transcription
Th:T helper
TANKs:Tumour associated natural killer cells
TINKs:Tumour infiltrating natural killer cells
TGF:Transforming growth factor
TME:Tumour microenvironment
TNF:Tumour necrosis factor
Treg:T regulatory
T1D:Type 1 diabetes
T2DM:Type 2 diabetes mellitus
v-abl:Abelson murine leukaemia viral oncogene homolog 1
VEGF:Vascular endothelial growth factor.

Disclosure

Luca Parisi and Barbara Bassani are co-first authors and Giampietro Farronato and Antonino Bruno are co-last authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Luca Parisi, Barbara Bassani, Giampietro Farronato, and Antonino Bruno share equal contribution.

Acknowledgments

Barbara Bassani and Elisabetta Gini are students of the Ph.D. program in Biotechnology, Biosciences, and Surgical Technologies, School in Biological and Medical Sciences, University of Insubria. Antonino Bruno was a FIRC (Fondazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro) fellow and is currently a fellow for Fondazione Umberto Veronesi (FUV).

References

  1. P. Libby, “Inflammation and cardiovascular disease mechanisms,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 456S–460S, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  2. S. Amor, F. Puentes, D. Baker, and P. Van Der Valk, “Inflammation in neurodegenerative diseases,” Immunology, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 154–169, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. C. K. Glass, K. Saijo, B. Winner, M. C. Marchetto, and F. H. Gage, “Mechanisms underlying inflammation in neurodegeneration,” Cell, vol. 140, no. 6, pp. 918–934, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. T. Wyss-Coray and L. Mucke, “Inflammation in neurodegenerative disease—a double-edged sword,” Neuron, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 419–432, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. Y. Donath, “Targeting inflammation in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: time to start,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 465–476, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. N. Esser, S. Legrand-Poels, J. Piette, A. J. Scheen, and N. Paquot, “Inflammation as a link between obesity, metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes,” Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 141–150, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. K. Esposito and D. Giugliano, “The metabolic syndrome and inflammation: association or causation?” Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 228–232, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  8. R. Monteiro and I. Azevedo, “Chronic inflammation in obesity and the metabolic syndrome,” Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2010, Article ID 289645, 10 pages, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. F. R. Balkwill and A. Mantovani, “Cancer-related inflammation: common themes and therapeutic opportunities,” Seminars in Cancer Biology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 33–40, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. L. M. Coussens and Z. Werb, “Inflammation and cancer,” Nature, vol. 420, no. 6917, pp. 860–867, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. C. I. Diakos, K. A. Charles, D. C. McMillan, and S. J. Clarke, “Cancer-related inflammation and treatment effectiveness,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. e493–e503, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. A. Bruno, A. Pagani, L. Pulze et al., “Orchestration of angiogenesis by immune cells,” Frontiers in Oncology, vol. 4, article 131, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  13. A. Mantovani, M. A. Cassatella, C. Costantini, and S. Jaillon, “Neutrophils in the activation and regulation of innate and adaptive immunity,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 519–531, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. A. Sica and A. Mantovani, “Macrophage plasticity and polarization: In vivo veritas,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 122, no. 3, pp. 787–795, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. B. R. Blazar, W. J. Murphy, and M. Abedi, “Advances in graft-versus-host disease biology and therapy,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 443–458, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. L. L. Lanier, “Turning on natural killer cells,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 191, no. 8, pp. 1259–1262, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. F. Gerosa, B. Baldani-Guerra, C. Nisii, V. Marchesini, G. Carra, and G. Trinchieri, “Reciprocal activating interaction between natural killer cells and dendritic cells,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 195, no. 3, pp. 327–333, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. N. C. Fernandez, A. Lozier, C. Flament et al., “Dendritic cells directly trigger NK cell functions: cross-talk relevant in innate anti-tumor immune responses in vivo,” Nature Medicine, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 405–411, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. R. Mocikat, H. Braumüller, A. Gumy et al., “Natural killer cells activated by MHC class ILow targets prime dendritic cells to induce protective CD8 T cell responses,” Immunity, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 561–569, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. E. Vivier, E. Tomasello, M. Baratin, T. Walzer, and S. Ugolini, “Functions of natural killer cells,” Nature Immunology, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 503–510, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  21. P. Le Bouteiller, “Human decidual NK cells: unique and tightly regulated effector functions in healthy and pathogen-infected pregnancies,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 4, article 404, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. S. M. Blois, B. F. Klapp, and G. Barrientos, “Decidualization and angiogenesis in early pregnancy: unravelling the functions of DC and NK cells,” Journal of Reproductive Immunology, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 86–92, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. J. Hanna, D. Goldman-Wohl, Y. Hamani et al., “Decidual NK cells regulate key developmental processes at the human fetal-maternal interface,” Nature Medicine, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 1065–1074, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. F. R. Balkwill, M. Capasso, and T. Hagemann, “The tumor microenvironment at a glance,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 125, no. 23, pp. 5591–5596, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. A. Bruno, A. Pagani, E. Magnani et al., “Inflammatory angiogenesis and the tumor microenvironment as targets for cancer therapy and prevention,” Cancer Treatment and Research, vol. 159, pp. 401–426, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. S. M. Crusz and F. R. Balkwill, “Inflammation and cancer: advances and new agents,” Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 584–596, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  27. D. M. Noonan, A. De Lerma Barbaro, N. Vannini, L. Mortara, and A. Albini, “Inflammation, inflammatory cells and angiogenesis: decisions and indecisions,” Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 31–40, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. D. Hanahan and R. A. Weinberg, “Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation,” Cell, vol. 144, no. 5, pp. 646–674, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. A. Bruno, G. Ferlazzo, A. Albini, and D. M. Noonan, “A think tank of TINK/TANKs: tumor-infiltrating/tumor-associated natural killer cells in tumor progression and angiogenesis,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 106, no. 8, article dju200, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. A. Bruno, C. Focaccetti, A. Pagani et al., “The proangiogenic phenotype of natural killer cells in patients with non-small cell lung cancer,” Neoplasia, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 133–142, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. J. Baginska, E. Viry, J. Paggetti et al., “The critical role of the tumor microenvironment in shaping natural killer cell-mediated anti-tumor immunity,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 4, article 490, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. R. A. Flavell, S. Sanjabi, S. H. Wrzesinski, and P. Licona-Limón, “The polarization of immune cells in the tumour environment by TGFbeta,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 554–567, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  33. H. Ikushima and K. Miyazono, “TGFΒ 2 signalling: a complex web in cancer progression,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 415–424, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. L. Yang, Y. Pang, and H. L. Moses, “TGF-β and immune cells: an important regulatory axis in the tumor microenvironment and progression,” Trends in Immunology, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 220–227, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. D. S. Allan, B. Rybalov, G. Awong et al., “TGF-beta affects development and differentiation of human natural killer cell subsets,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 2289–2295, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  36. A. S. Cerdeira, A. Rajakumar, C. M. Royle et al., “Conversion of peripheral blood NK cells to a decidual NK-like phenotype by a cocktail of defined factors,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 190, no. 8, pp. 3939–3948, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. D. B. Keskin, D. S. J. Allan, B. Rybalov et al., “TGFβ promotes conversion of CD16+ peripheral blood NK cells into CD16- NK cells with similarities to decidual NK cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 9, pp. 3378–3383, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. K. D. Beaman, M. K. Jaiswal, G. K. Katara et al., “Pregnancy is a model for tumors, not transplantation,” American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 3–7, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  39. S. G. Holtan, D. J. Creedon, P. Haluska, and S. N. Markovic, “Cancer and pregnancy: parallels in growth, invasion, and immune modulation and implications for cancer therapeutic agents,” Mayo Clinic Proceedings, vol. 84, no. 11, pp. 985–1000, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. D. W. Hoskin, J. S. Mader, S. J. Furlong, D. M. Conrad, and J. Blay, “Inhibition of T cell and natural killer cell function by adenosine and its contribution to immune evasion by tumor cells (Review),” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 527–535, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  41. V. Kumar and A. Sharma, “Adenosine: an endogenous modulator of innate immune system with therapeutic potential,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 616, no. 1–3, pp. 7–15, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. G. Berchem, M. Z. Noman, M. Bosseler et al., “Hypoxic tumor-derived microvesicles negatively regulate NK cell function by a mechanism involving TGF-beta and miR23a transfer,” Oncoimmunology, vol. 5, no. 4, Article ID e1062968, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  43. L. Antonioli, C. Blandizzi, P. Pacher, and G. Haskó, “Immunity, inflammation and cancer: a leading role for adenosine,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 842–857, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. D. W. Greening, S. K. Gopal, R. Xu, R. J. Simpson, and W. Chen, “Exosomes and their roles in immune regulation and cancer,” Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 40, pp. 72–81, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  45. J. Webber, V. Yeung, and A. Clayton, “Extracellular vesicles as modulators of the cancer microenvironment,” Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 40, pp. 27–34, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  46. K. Denzer, M. J. Kleijmeer, H. F. G. Heijnen, W. Stoorvogel, and H. J. Geuze, “Exosome: from internal vesicle of the multivesicular body to intercellular signaling device,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 113, no. 19, pp. 3365–3374, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  47. H. Valadi, K. Ekström, A. Bossios, M. Sjöstrand, J. J. Lee, and J. O. Lötvall, “Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 654–659, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. A. Clayton, J. P. Mitchell, J. Court, S. Linnane, M. D. Mason, and Z. Tabi, “Human tumor-derived exosomes down-modulate NKG2D expression,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 180, no. 11, pp. 7249–7258, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  49. A. Clayton and Z. Tabi, “Exosomes and the MICA-NKG2D system in cancer,” Blood Cells, Molecules, and Diseases, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 206–213, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. L. Muller, M. Mitsuhashi, P. Simms, W. E. Gooding, and T. L. Whiteside, “Tumor-derived exosomes regulate expression of immune function-related genes in human T cell subsets,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, article 20254, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. D. Gotthardt, E. M. Putz, E. Grundschober et al., “STAT5 is a key regulator in NK cells and acts as a molecular switch from tumor surveillance to tumor promotion,” Cancer Discovery, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 414–429, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  52. J. E. Phillips, J. J. Couper, M. A. S. Penno et al., “Type 1 diabetes: a disease of developmental origins,” Pediatric Diabetes, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. J. Huang, Y. Xiao, A. Xu, and Z. Zhou, “Neutrophils in type 1 diabetes,” Journal of Diabetes Investigation, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 652–663, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  54. N. Van Gassen, W. Staels, E. Van Overmeire et al., “Concise review: macrophages: versatile gatekeepers during pancreatic beta-cell development, injury, and regeneration,” Stem Cells Translational Medicine, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 555–563, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  55. D. H. Wagner, “Of the multiple mechanisms leading to type 1 diabetes, T cell receptor revision may play a prominent role (is type 1 diabetes more than a single disease?),” Clinical & Experimental Immunology, vol. 185, no. 3, pp. 271–280, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  56. G. S. Eisenbarth, “Type I diabetes mellitus. A chronic autoimmune disease,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 314, no. 21, pp. 1360–1368, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  57. M. A. Kelly, M. L. Rayner, C. H. Mijovic, and A. H. Barnett, “Molecular aspects of type 1 diabetes,” Molecular Pathology, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  58. A. G. Baxter and M. J. Smyth, “The role of NK cells in autoimmune disease,” Autoimmunity, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. M. Flodstrom, A. Maday, D. Balakrishna, M. M. Cleary, A. Yoshimura, and N. Sarvetnick, “Target cell defense prevents the development of diabetes after viral infection,” Nature Immunology, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 373–382, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  60. L. Poirot, C. Benoist, and D. Mathis, “Natural killer cells distinguish innocuous and destructive forms of pancreatic islet autoimmunity,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 21, pp. 8102–8107, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. I. Lee, H. Qin, J. Trudeau, J. Dutz, and R. Tan, “Regulation of autoimmune diabetes by complete Freund's adjuvant is mediated by NK cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 172, no. 2, pp. 937–942, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  62. L. D. Poulton, M. J. Smyth, C. G. Hawke et al., “Cytometric and functional analyses of NK and NKT cell deficiencies in NOD mice,” International Immunology, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 887–896, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  63. S. E. Johansson, H. Hall, J. Björklund, and P. Höglund, “Broadly impaired NK cell function in non-obese diabetic mice is partially restored by NK cell activation in vivo and by IL-12/IL-18 in vitro,” International Immunology, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. M. J. Hussain, L. Alviggi, B. A. Millward, R. D. G. Leslie, D. A. Pyke, and D. Vergani, “Evidence that the reduced number of natural killer cells in Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes may be genetically determined,” Diabetologia, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 907–911, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. M. P. N. Nair, E. W. Lewis, and S. A. Schwartz, “Immunoregulatory dysfunctions in type I diabetes: natural and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxic activities,” Journal of Clinical Immunology, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 363–372, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. K. Negishi, N. Waldeck, G. Chandy et al., “Natural killer cell and islet killer cell activities in Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes,” Diabetologia, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 352–357, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. R. Lorini, A. Moretta, A. Valtorta et al., “Cytotoxic activity in children with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus,” Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 37–42, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. R. G. Wilson, J. Anderson, B. K. Shenton, M. D. White, R. M. R. Taylor, and G. Proud, “Natural killer cells in insulin dependent diabetes mellitus,” British Medical Journal, vol. 293, no. 6541, p. 244, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. M. Rodacki, A. Milech, and J. E. P. D. Oliveira, “NK cells and type 1 diabetes,” Clinical and Developmental Immunology, vol. 13, no. 2-4, pp. 101–107, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. M. Rodacki, B. Svoren, V. Butty et al., “Altered natural killer cells in type 1 diabetic patients,” Diabetes, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 177–185, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. G. Hajishengallis, “Periodontitis: from microbial immune subversion to systemic inflammation,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 30–44, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  72. O. A. Gonzalez, M. J. Novak, S. Kirakodu et al., “Comparative analysis of gingival tissue antigen presentation pathways in ageing and periodontitis,” Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 327–339, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. S. Fujita, H. Takahashi, H. Okabe, Y. Ozaki, Y. Hara, and I. Kato, “Distribution of natural killer cells in periodontal diseases: an immunohistochemical study.,” Journal of Periodontology, vol. 63, no. 8, pp. 686–689, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  74. W. Kopp, “Density and localization of lymphocytes with natural‐killer (NK) cell activity in periodontal biopsy specimens from patients with severe periodontitis,” Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 595–600, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. S. Stelin, H. Ramakrishan, A. Talwar, K. V. Arun, and T. S. Kumar, “Immunohistological analysis of CD1a langerhans cells and CD57 natural killer cells in healthy and diseased human gingival tissue: a comparative study,” Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 150–154, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  76. S. E. Wynne, L. J. Walsh, G. J. Seymour, and R. N. Powell, “In situ demonstration of natural killer (NK) cells in human gingival tissue.,” Journal of Periodontology, vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 699–702, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  77. C. M. Cobb, O. Singla, P. H. Feil, F. C. Theisen, and R. E. Schultz, “Comparison of NK-cell (Leu-7+ and Leu-11b+) populations in clinically healthy gingiva, chronic gingivitis and chronic adult periodontitis,” Journal of Periodontal Research, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  78. S. Chaushu, A. Wilensky, C. Gur et al., “Direct recognition of fusobacterium nucleatum by the NK cell natural cytotoxicity receptor NKp46 aggravates periodontal disease,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 8, no. 3, Article ID e1002601, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. Y. W. Han, R. W. Redline, M. Li, L. Yin, G. B. Hill, and T. S. McCormick, “Fusobacterium nucleatum Induces Premature and Term Stillbirths in Pregnant Mice: implication of oral bacteria in preterm birth,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 2272–2279, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. J. Slots, H. S. Reynolds, and R. J. Genco, “Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans in human periodontal disease: a cross-sectional microbiological investigation,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1013–1020, 1980. View at: Google Scholar
  81. T. Kikuchi, C. L. Hahn, S. Tanaka, S. E. Barbour, H. A. Schenkein, and J. G. Tew, “Dendritic cells stimulated with Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans elicit rapid gamma interferon responses by natural killer cells,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 72, no. 9, pp. 5089–5096, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. S. S. Socransky and A. D. Haffajee, “The bacterial etiology of destructive periodontal disease: current concepts,” Journal of Periodontology, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 322–331, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  83. B. Kramer, M. Kebschull, M. Nowak et al., “Role of the NK cell-activating receptor CRACC in periodontitis,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 690–696, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. A. Zeidel, B. Beilin, I. Yardeni, E. Mayburd, G. Smirnov, and H. Bessler, “Immune response in asymptomatic smokers,” Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 959–964, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. A. Acikgoz, F. O. Ozden, T. Fisgin et al., “Oral and dental findings in Fanconi's anemia,” Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 531–539, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  86. G. A. Justo, M. A. Bitencourt, R. Pasquini et al., “Immune status of Fanconi anemia patients: decrease in T CD8 and CD56 dim CD16+ NK lymphocytes,” Annals of Hematology, vol. 93, no. 5, pp. 761–767, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. K. C. Myers, J. J. Bleesing, S. M. Davies et al., “Impaired immune function in children with Fanconi anaemia,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 154, no. 2, pp. 234–240, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  88. V. J. Rathod and N. V. Joshi, “Papillon-Lefevre syndrome: a report of two cases,” Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 275–278, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  89. T. Lundgren, R. S. Parhar, S. Renvert, and D. N. Tatakis, “Impaired cytotoxicity in Papillon-Lefèvre syndrome,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 414–417, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. Y. Li, K. To, P. Kanellakis et al., “CD4+ natural killer T cells potently augment aortic root atherosclerosis by perforin-and granzyme b-dependent cytotoxicity,” Circulation Research, vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 245–254, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. Y. V. Bobryshev and R. S. A. Lord, “Identification of natural killer cells in human atherosclerotic plaque,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 180, no. 2, pp. 423–427, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. S. C. Whitman, D. L. Rateri, S. J. Szilvassy, W. Yokoyama, and A. Daugherty, “Depletion of natural killer cell function decreases atherosclerosis in low-density lipoprotein receptor null mice,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1049–1054, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. P. Allavena, G. Bianchi, D. Zhou et al., “Induction of natural killer cell migration by monocyte chemotactic protein−1, −2 and −3,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 3233–3236, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. H. Umehara, E. T. Bloom, T. Okazaki, Y. Nagano, O. Yoshie, and T. Imai, “Fractalkine in vascular biology: from basic research to clinical disease,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 34–40, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  95. D. A. Chistiakov, I. A. Sobenin, A. N. Orekhov, and Y. V. Bobryshev, “Dendritic cells in atherosclerotic inflammation: the complexity of functions and the peculiarities of pathophysiological effects,” Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 5, article 00196, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. Z. Mallat, A. Corbaz, A. Scoazec et al., “Interleukin-18/interleukin-18 binding protein signaling modulates atherosclerotic lesion development and stability.,” Circulation research, vol. 89, no. 7, pp. E41–E45, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  97. K. Uyemura, L. L. Demer, S. C. Castle et al., “Cross-regulatory roles of interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-10 in atherosclerosis,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 97, no. 9, pp. 2130–2138, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  98. A. Selathurai, V. Deswaerte, P. Kanellakis et al., “Natural killer (NK) cells augment atherosclerosis by cytotoxic-dependent mechanisms,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 128–137, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. M. F. Linton, A. S. Major, and S. Fazio, “Proatherogenic role for NK cells revealed,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 992–994, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. K. Dong, J. Ge, S. Gu et al., “Ox-LDL can enhance the interaction of mice natural killer cells and dendritic cells via the CD48-2B4 pathway,” Heart and Vessels, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 637–645, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. F. Cheng, L. Twardowski, K. Reifenberg et al., “Combined B, T and NK cell deficiency accelerates atherosclerosis in BALB/c mice,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 8, Article ID e0157311, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  102. I. Bonaccorsi, C. De Pasquale, S. Campana et al., “Natural killer cells in the innate immunity network of atherosclerosis,” Immunology Letters, vol. 168, no. 1, pp. 51–57, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  103. K. Kotfis, J. Biernawska, M. Zegan-Baranska, and M. Zukowski, “Peripheral Blood Lymphocyte Subsets (CD4+, CD8+ T Cells, NK Cells) in Patients with Cardiovascular and Neurological Complications after Carotid Endarterectomy,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 10077–10094, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  104. H. Bruunsgaard, A. N. Pedersen, M. Schroll, P. Skinhoj, and B. K. Pedersen, “Decreased natural killer cell activity is associated with atherosclerosis in elderly humans,” Experimental Gerontology, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 127–136, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  105. L. Jonasson, K. Backteman, and J. Ernerudh, “Loss of natural killer cell activity in patients with coronary artery disease,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 183, no. 2, pp. 316–321, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2017 Luca Parisi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

2171 Views | 673 Downloads | 15 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.