Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Immunology Research
Volume 2017, Article ID 4645701, 8 pages
Research Article

Bactericide, Immunomodulating, and Wound Healing Properties of Transgenic Kalanchoe pinnata Synergize with Antimicrobial Peptide Cecropin P1 In Vivo

1Russian Academy of Sciences, Branch of Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Pushchino, Moscow Region, Russia
2Kursk State University, Kursk, Russia
3Kursk State Medical University, Kursk, Russia
4National Institute for Health Development, Tallinn, Estonia
5Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia
6Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics, Moscow, Russia

Correspondence should be addressed to T. V. Kuznetsova; ee.iat@avostenzuk.anaitat

Received 3 December 2016; Accepted 23 January 2017; Published 23 February 2017

Academic Editor: Sergey Morzunov

Copyright © 2017 A. A. Lebedeva et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Procedure of manufacturing K. pinnata water extracts containing cecropin P1 (CecP1) from the formerly described transgenic plants is established. It included incubation of leaves at +4°C for 7 days, mechanical homogenization of leaves using water as extraction solvent, and heating at +70°C for inactivating plant enzymes. Yield of CecP1 (after heating and sterilizing filtration) was 0.3% of total protein in the extract. The water extract of K. pinnata + CecP1 exhibits favorable effect on healing of wounds infected with S. aureus (equal to Cefazolin) and with a combination of S. aureus with P. aeruginosa (better than Cefazolin). Wild-type K. pinnata extract exhibited evident microbicide activity against S. aureus with P. aeruginosa but it was substantially strengthened in K. pinnata + CecP1 extract. K. pinnata extracts (both wild-type and transgenic) did not exhibit general toxicity and accelerated wound recovery. Due to immunomodulating activity, wild-type K. pinnata extract accelerated granulation of the wound bed and marginal epithelialization even better than K. pinnata + CecP1 extract. Immunomodulating and microbicide activity of K. pinnata synergizes with microbicide activity of CecP1 accelerating elimination of bacteria.

1. Introduction

Due to a broad use of antibiotics, drug resistance of microbial pathogens became one of the greatest problems of the modern medicine [1]. It is of a particular importance in complicated chronic conditions, for example, in trophic ulcers in patients with diabetes mellitus where long-term antimicrobial therapy is mandatory [2]. Due to a peculiar mechanism of action, antimicrobial peptides (AMP) are considered to be a promising alternative to the traditional antibiotics [3]. Data about velocity of rising resistance to them in microbial pathogens in comparison to the antibiotics is contradictory since practical application of AMP is much narrower than one of the antibiotics [4]. A high side toxicity and low proteolytic stability often figure as a general reason of a poor AMP (e.g., magainins/bombinins and defensins) applicability in pharmaceutics [5].

AMP cecropin P1 (CecP1) was found for the first time in a swine intestine [6]. Then it was reattributed to a swine helminth Ascaris suis abundant in the gut of pigs [7]. In contrast to most other known AMP, CecP1 is naturally adapted to act in a medium with a high level proteolytic activity exhibited by duodenal enzymes. Ubiquitous abundance of A. suis in pigs provides an evidence that CecP1 does not impair viability of the mammalian host even when accumulated in a high dosage [8]. Therefore application of CecP1 in pharmacy looks promising. However, for a long time, CecP1 was not available for clinical trials due to absence of an appropriate way for its producing. Solid-phase chemical synthesis is too expensive, liquid-phase synthesis has not been established, and biosynthesis is precluded by a toxicity of CecP1 to potential producers (bacteria, yeast, and micellar fungi). Sophisticated methods of its producing by recombinant strains within fused proteins with decreased toxicity are expensive and difficult for technological implementation [9]. However, there is a broad range of data about microbicide activity of CecP1 towards bacterial and fungal phytopathogens [10] and human/animal pathogens [11]. Virucide and antitumor activity was also attributed to CecP1 [12, 13].

Recently engineering transgenic plants of Kalanchoe pinnata expressing CecP1 synthetic gene and accumulating the recombinant AMP in cytoplasm was reported [10]. Bactericide efficiency of pure CecP1 and the wild-type K. pinnata extract against model bacterial strains is described [14]. However, data about antimicrobial efficiency of the recombinant CecP1 in vivo and its possible side toxicity are not available. Here we report results of testing medicinal activity of K. pinnata extracts containing CecP1 (compared with an extract of a wild-type K. pinnata) in a rat model of wounds infected with Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains recently isolated from patients with a purulent infection. Antisuppurative, wound healing, and antimicrobial effect were assessed and used as criteria for comparison of antimicrobial and toxic effects of CecP1 within K. pinnata extract in vivo.

K. pinnata seems to be a promising bioreactor for CecP1 production since its extract may be used for epicutaneous application without special purification. K. pinnata (Lam.) Pers. (syn. Bryophyllum pinnatum; family Crassulaceae) is a popular plant used in traditional medicine in many temperate regions of the world and particularly in South America [15]. There are a number of reports about activity of K. pinnata extracts against bacteria [16, 17], Leishmania [18], insects [19], and even viruses [20, 21].

Wild-type K. pinnata extracts harbor a number of bioactive compounds, for example, bufadienolides [22], flavonols (polyphenols and glycosides of syringe acid) [23], and hemagglutinating lectins [24, 25]. They confer complex immunomodulatory [26, 27], lymphoproliferative [18], antioxidant [28, 29], microbicide [30], and cytotoxic [22, 31, 32] properties on the extracts. Some of these effects look directed oppositely. For instance, Da Silva et al.   [18] reported activation of Th1-type response (IL-2 and IFN-γ overproduction) and suppression of Th2-type response (downregulation of IL-4) by a juice of Kalanchoe brasiliensis upon a systemic administration to mice, whereas Umbuzeiro-Valent et al. [33] and El Abdellaoui et al. [22] found an anti-inflammatory (antihistamine) effect in the same preparation. Shirobokov et al. [20] described induction of a blast-transformation in lymphocytes of peripheral blood by a lectin from Kalanchoe blossfeldiana likely due to concanavalin A whereas Costa et al. [34] described an antiproliferative effect of patuletin acetylrhamnosides from Kalanchoe brasiliensis on human lymphocytes. Taken together, these data do not allow a comprehensive prediction of a synergistic or antagonistic effect of antimicrobial effects of CecP1 and K. pinnata juice natural ingredients towards bacterial pathogens in vivo (with involvement of innate immune mechanisms of the animal).

We addressed a problem of producing a highly stable K. pinnata extract bearing CecP1 and testing its therapeutic activity towards Staphylococcus aureus purulent mono infection and its combination with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (as an example of typical nosocomial infection). The experiment was carried out in a model of infected planar wounds in rats. Experimental samples of K. pinnata extracts bearing CecP1 were compared with a wild-type K. pinnata extract and with a commonly used antibiotic Cefazolin (first-generation semisynthetic cephalosporin with a predominant activity towards Gram-positive bacteria) [35]. A subgroup of nontreated rats infected with the same bacterial pathogens was used as a negative control. The therapeutic effect was estimated by wound healing activity (planimetric method) and by microbicide activity (microbiological study of tissue samples in the wound cavity).

2. Methods

2.1. Producing K. pinnata Extracts

K. pinnata extracts were prepared from leaves of K. pinnata transgenic plants bearing a binary vector for Agrobacterium tumefaciens vector with T-element randomly integrated to a plant genome. The vector did not contain a drug resistance marker. The plants selected by a direct immunological testing exhibited a highly stable yield of CecP1 for at least two years as proved by immunoblotting, antimicrobial plate test, and HPLC combined with mass-spectroscopy detection. 5.07 L of extract was produced from 3 kg of recombinant plant leaves using deionized water as an extracting solvent. After sterilizing filtration through nylon membrane with 0.22 μm pores the extract contained 1 mg/mL total protein and 0.7 μg/mL CecP1. The extract of wild-type K. pinnata was produced by the same method and adjusted to the same concentration of the total protein. Synthetic CecP1 peptide described previously [14] was used as a standard for quantification of CecP1 in the recombinant K. pinnata extracts.

2.2. Animals

This experimental study in vivo was organized according to European Convention about defense of the vertebrates used for experiments or for another scientific aims (Strasbourg, Mar 18, 1986) of ETS N123. 240 adult male Wistar rats weighing  g and aged 3-4 months were totally allocated for the experiment. After quarantine they were placed into individual cages. All animals were contained in equal terms on a standard diet: twelve hours of darkness and 12 hours of light were available. They had a ready access to water and food.

The animals were randomly divided into groups (60 animal each) treated with wild-type K. pinnata extract, recombinant K. pinnata extract containing CecP1 (K. pinnata + CecP1), Cefazolin (positive control), respectively, and a negative control group (mock treatment with a saline). Each group was randomly divided into two subgroups (30 animals each) infected with (1) S. aureus and (2) S. aureus + P. aeruginosa. Each subgroup was divided into three echelons withdrawn from the experiment at 3rd, 10th, and, 14th day after beginning of curing.

2.3. Bacterial Strains

Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora ATCC 15713 (type strain) was cultivated at plates with LB medium (peptone bacto (Difco) 10 g/L, yeast extract (Difco) 5 g/L, NaCl 10 g/L, and agar 15 g/L) at 25°C.

The bacterial pathogens Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) isolated from clinical specimens were purchased from type strain collection of Tarasevich Research Institute for Standardization and Control of Medical Biological Preparations. The strains were grown for 18–20 h at slant IPA (meat-peptone nutrient agar) supplemented with 0.1% glucose. The fresh cultures were rinsed out with a sterile saline, thoroughly suspended, adjusted to a concentration ~109 CFU per mL by using an optical turbidity standard CCA 42-28-29-85, and used for inoculation of wounds.

2.4. Surgical Manipulations, Treatment, and Planimetry Assay of the Wounds

A purulent infection was modeled in rat using a method described previously [36]. The animals were anesthetized with ether. A square shape 20 × 20 cm skin area at the animal back was thoroughly shaved and treated by a disinfectant (70% ethanol); derma and epidermis were surgically removed. 1 mL of bacterial suspension containing 109 CFU/mL S. aureus ATCC 25923 or 109 CFU/mL S. aureus ATCC 25923 and 109 CFU/mL P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 was distributed at the surface of the wound. For standardizing the wound healing conditions the wound cavity was closed with a gauze bandage coupled to the skin.

36 h after wounding and infection all animals exhibited clear symptoms of suppuration and inflammation. In this moment the stitches and the bandage were removed, and the wound cavity was thoroughly washed from the pus. The wound area was determined by its lineation at a sterile transparent film. Then the wounds were treated with 3% hydrogen peroxide and subjected to a specific treatment. The described wound treatment was repeated daily for 14 days after beginning of the curing.

The wounds in the control subgroup were treated with 3% hydrogen peroxide and with a sterile saline. Other subgroups instead of the saline were treated with 10% Cefazolin or with undiluted K. pinnata extract containing 1 mg/mL total protein (experimental preparation contained 0.7 μg/mL CecP1).

The animals were examined daily and stages of wound healing (inflammation, granulation, and maturation (marginal epithelialization)) were fixed.

The planimetric analysis of the wound recovery percentage was carried out at 3rd, 10th, and 14th day after beginning of curing. After this one echelon (10 animals from each subgroup) was withdrawn from the experiment. The animals were sacrificed with overdose of the ether anesthesia.

Wounds on different days were measured as described formerly [37] by transparent sheet which was scanned at resolution 200 pcs/inch. The image was acquired in a format Adobe Photoshop CS5 Extended. The object was selected and its square was automatically calculated by selecting a menu command “Analysis.” An average mean and a standard error () were calculated. The recovery percentage was evaluated with following formula:

recovery percentage = (wound surface on the day zero of curing − wound surface on day )/wound surface on the day zero of curing × 100, where = day of wound surface measurement.

2.5. Bacteriological Analysis of Microbial Load in Wound Cavity Tissue

0,1–0,5 g tissue (fibrous mass, infiltrate, and underlying derma) was sampled from a sacrificed animal under aseptic conditions, weighed at analytical grade balances (accuracy 0.1 mg), placed in a sterile porcelain mortar, mixed with a sterile saline in a ratio 1 : 10, and homogenized with a sterile pestle for 3 min. The homogenate was diluted 1000 times with a sterile saline (with three consequent steps 1 : 10 using 1 mL samples) and 100 μL aliquot of each dilution was inoculated to Petri dishes with IPA (meat-peptone nutrient agar) supplemented with 0.1% glucose. The inoculated dishes were incubated at °С for 20 h and then 1 day more at a room temperature. The colonies were counted and number of CFU recalculated per 1 g tissue. The count was suggested to be valid if number of colonies was between 30 and 300.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis of research results was performed by Microsoft Excel 2007 and program “Statistics” 8.0 StatSoft. The averages of quantitative indexes and standard errors of mean were calculated. Authenticity of distinctions of averages between the series of comparison and other series was estimated by the Mann–Whitney test ().

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Producing K. pinnata Extracts

Three independent K. pinnata transgenic lines (~1-year-old plants height 2–2,5 m) and a wild-type parental K. pinnata of the same age cultivated in a green-house under a constant light/darkness and temperature regime were used for producing the extracts. Middle tier leaves were used for preliminary testing of CecP1 yield. 200–300 mg specimens were sampled, placed in Eppendorf tubes, and weighed and mixed with NEB buffer (10% glycerol, 4 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 100 mM NH4Cl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.2 mg/mL leupeptin, and 0.2 mg/mL trypsin inhibitor) in ratio 20 μL per 100 mg leaf tissue. The leaf specimens were homogenized with a glass stick in the Eppendorf tubes and total protein was measured by Bradford method (Sigma-Aldrich B6916 ready-to-use kit was used following instructions of manufacturer). The extracts were adjusted to the total protein concentration 1 mg/mL with NEB buffer and used for determination of antimicrobial activity by diffusion in agar against E. carotovora subsp. сarotovora. 108 CFU/plate were distributed at 90 mm Petri dishes with LB medium using top agarose method. Wells with diameter 5 mm were pierced in the agar and 100 μL aliquots of the plant extracts were dripped to each well. A synthetic CecP1 (1 μg/mL) in amount 100 μL per well was used as a standard. Results of the testing are shown at Figure 1.

Figure 1: Agar diffusion test for determination of antibacterial activity towards E. carotovora in extracts of K. pinnata transgenic lines. (1) K. pinnata, line #1, halo 29 mm; (2) synthetic CecP1 (1 μg/mL), halo 34 mm; (3) K. pinnata, line #2, halo 26 mm; (4) K. pinnata line #3, halo 28 mm.

Data of Figure 1 allow estimating yield of CecP1 contents in the leaves of K. pinnata transgenic lines ~0.3–0.5 of the total soluble protein. Transgenic line (1) was chosen for preparative manufacturing of the extract. An extract of the wild-type parental K. pinnata was prepared in parallel. 3.0 kg cut leaves were incubated at +4°С for 7 days in darkness. The leaves were mixed with the ice-cold water (1.0 L water per 1 kg leaves) and homogenized with a hand electric blender. The homogenate was dark-green. It was clarified by centrifugation at for 30 min. The green pallet was discarded. The straw-yellow extract was placed in 0.5 L glass flasks and incubated at +70°C in a water bath for inactivating enzymes. The extract was clarified by centrifugation at for 30 min and sterilized by filtration through a 0.22 μm filtering cartridge (Hydrophilic PNN Membrane Filter, Hangzhou Kosma Membrane Technology Co., PRC) under aseptic conditions. The extracts were stored at +4°C in culture flasks of nominal volume 0.5 L hermetically closed with rubber plugs and aluminum caps until used for biological testing.

Presence of CecP1 in the extracts was tested using immunoblotting as described formerly [10] (Figure 2). Briefly, 10.0 μL of extract and 30.0 μL of the control synthetic CecP1 (1 μg/mL) were pelleted with 10% trichloroacetic acid, denatured and separated in 15% polyacrylamide gel, blotted to nitrocellulose membrane, and stained with rabbit polyclonal antibodies.

Figure 2: Immunoblotting analysis of K. pinnata extracts. (+) synthetic CecР1,  kDa (30 ng); (1) K. pinnata transgenic line 1 after the cold stress; (2) K. pinnata transgenic line 2 after the cold stress; (3) K. pinnata transgenic line 2 before the cold stress; (4) K. pinnata transgenic line 2 before the cold stress.

The immunoblotting demonstrated upregulation of CecP1 expression in K. pinnata leaves under cold stress conditions. Further antimicrobial activity of the extracts was confirmed in the agar diffusion test at E. carotovora model as described above. Overall report about manufacturing K. pinnata extracts containing CecP1 is shown in Table 1.

Table 1: Reproducibility of manufacturing K. pinnata extracts containing CecP1.
3.2. Testing Healing of the Wounds Infected with S. aureus

S. aureus is the most common causative agent of the nosocomial purulent infections. It is prone to raising multiple drug resistance. As found in 3-month epidemiological study to determine the prevalence and antibiotic resistance of S. aureus nosocomial infections in 52 centers throughout Italy in 2012, the prevalence of S. aureus among all nosocomial pathogens isolated in that period was 11.6% (), whilst the prevalence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) among the S. aureus was 35.8% () [38]. However, the collection S. aureus strain ATCC 25923 exhibited a high susceptibility to Cefazolin in vitro and was chosen as a model object for in vivo studies of efficiency of K. pinnata extracts which was compared with this antibiotic. Data at Figure 3 demonstrate that the wound recovery percentage is significantly higher in K. pinnata + CecP1 subgroup than in the control subgroup (mock treatment): the difference is characterized with the third threshold of validity () at 10th and 14th days. The final wound healing activity of K. pinnata + CecP1 did not differ from one of Cefazolin groups: at days 10 and 14 when two subgroups were compared. Wild-type K. pinnata extract exhibited a certain efficiency (difference with the negative control was characterized with the first threshold of significance at 10th and 14th days after beginning of curing). However, the wound healing activity of K. pinnata + CecP1 extract was significantly higher than in the wild-type K. pinnata extract ( at 10th day and at 14th day). This gives an evidence of a clear CecP1 contribution to the own K. pinnata extract therapeutic efficiency.

Figure 3: Testing healing of the wounds infected with S. aureus. Wound recovery percentage at 10th and 14th days after beginning of curing () is shown.

Positive results were obtained when timing of wound recovery phases was compared between the animal subgroups. Data of Figure 4 demonstrate that the inflammation phase ends about 2 times faster in all three experimental subgroups than in the control subgroup without specific treatment. However, start of granulation phase in K. pinnata subgroup (but not in K. pinnata + CecP1) was found about 1 day earlier than in Cefazolin subgroup (difference between the subgroups first threshold is characterized with the first threshold of significance, ). Marginal epithelialization (maturation phase) was found almost 2 days faster in K. pinnata and K. pinnata + CecP1 subgroups than in Cefazolin subgroup (). Taken together these data prove a favorable effect of K. pinnata extract components for healing of the infected wounds which cannot be substituted with antibiotic and strengthening the antimicrobial activity.

Figure 4: Testing healing of the wounds infected with S. aureus. Timing of wound recovery phases after beginning of curing (.) is shown.
3.3. Testing Healing of Wound Infected with a Combination of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa

Mixed purulent infections usually are heavier and difficult for curing than mono infections. Men’shikov et al. [39] reported that complex infection of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa is associated with the most unfavorable prognosis in patients with burns. In contrast to S. aureus, P. aeruginosa is usually resistant to Cefazolin [35]; therefore outcome of treatment of a mixed infection of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa is poorly predictable.

Experimental study of wounds infected with equal doses of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa demonstrated that their recovery in the control subgroups (without treatment) does not differ significantly from S. aureus mono infection and even goes somewhat faster (Figure 5). However, treatment of S. aureus + P. aeruginosa with Cefazolin is significantly less efficient than S. aureus mono infection (). Comparison of the control and Cefazolin subgroups within the mixed infection group demonstrated no significant difference (). Therefore, Cefazolin can be acknowledged to be inefficient for treatment of the mixed purulent infection.

Figure 5: Testing healing of the wounds infected with combination of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa. Wound recovery percentage at 10th and 14th days after beginning of curing () is shown.

Using the wild-type K. pinnata extract gives somewhat better results than Cefazolin for curing the mixed infection. Difference between K. pinnata and the control subgroups is characterized with for 14th day ( for 10th day). At this background, efficiency of K. pinnata + CecP1 extract with the control looks highly promising: for 10th day and for 14th day after beginning of curing.

When timing of the wound healing was compared in the mixed infection group of animals, Cefazolin was found to be much more efficient than for the wound recovery percentage (Figure 6). Difference between Cefazolin and the control subgroups was characterized with for all three parameters (end of inflammation, start of granulation, and start of marginal epithelialization).

Figure 6: Testing healing of the wounds infected with combination of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa. Timing of wound recovery phases after beginning of curing () is shown.

On the other hand, comparison of K. pinnata and P. pinnata + CecP1 subgroups demonstrated no difference in timing of end of inflammation (), whereas granulation and marginal epithelialization were found to start earlier in K. pinnata subgroup. This ambiguous result cannot be explained by effect of CecP1 only. Apparently, immunomodulating effect of own K. pinnata biologically active compounds (flavonoids or lectins) for granulation and epithelialization was more pronounced than antimicrobial; effect of CecP1 and production of these compounds was higher in the control K. pinnata plants than on the transgenic plants expressing CecP1. In turn, this hypothesis is not in a good agreement with an evident impact of Cefazolin on the timing of the wound healing phases but not on the wound recovery rate.

3.4. Testing Microbicide Activity of K. pinnata Extracts In Vivo

Planimetrical studies of wound healing provide key information about therapeutically efficiency of the antimicrobial means. However, they must be supplemented with direct data about survival of the microbial agents in the wound bed. These data are important for optimization of the treatment scheme.

Data at Figure 7 demonstrate collapsing bacterial load of S. aureus along with the wound healing. This phenomenon is evident even in the control subgroup (without treatment); however it is much greater in the experimental subgroups. On the other hand, residual bacteria are found in all subgroups even at 14th day of the experiment. All four subgroups exhibit statistically significant differences between each other in the bacterial load at 3rd and 10th day of the experiment () following in the order: control > Cefazolin > K. pinnata > K. pinnata + CecP1. In contrast, no valid differences between the subgroups in the bacterial load are found at 14th days after beginning of curing. This observation proves existence of refugees in vivo where the pathogen can take a cover even against drugs with high microbicide potency. This effect may contribute to rising drug resistance in bacteria by providing time necessary to the pathogen for adaptation to the therapy.

Figure 7: Testing microbicide activity of K. pinnata extracts against S. aureus mono infection in vivo.

Picture of the microbicide activity of K. pinnata extracts against combination of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa roughly repeat the picture of the microbicide activity against S. aureus mono infection (Figure 8). There is a statistical significance of the bacterial load between all groups () at 10th (not 3rd) day of experiment. Microbicide effect of Cefazolin against the mixed infection was weak but not zero. Extract of the wild-type K. pinnata was less efficient than K. pinnata + CecP1 () at 10th and 14th days of experiment. However, residual bacterial load at 14th day of the experiment was much higher in the mixed infection than in S. aureus mono infection.

Figure 8: Testing microbicide activity of K. pinnata extracts against combination of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa in vivo.

4. Conclusions

Transgenic line of K. pinnata with the highest CecP1 was selected 1 year after its obtaining. A cold stress induction of CecP1 synthesis in cut K. pinnata leaves incubated at +4°C for 7 days allowed increased yield of CecP1 1.5–2 times. A simple and efficient procedure of water extraction CecP1 from K. pinnata leaves was established. In contrast to the commonly used ethanol extraction [21, 22], it allowed preservation of hemagglutinating lectins described in Kalanchoe [25] and exhibiting lymphoproliferative activity [20]. However, these proteins may be lost due to denaturation in the course of the extract heating at +70°C. Heating the extract was mandatory for inactivation of proteases which otherwise degraded CecP1 under the storage for 7 days at +4°C.

Following our data, the extracts of K. pinnata (wild and transgenic) did not exhibit any cytotoxic activity towards the wound bed or general toxicity at animals in the applied concentration (1 mL of the extract per dose, total protein concentration 1 mg/mL) although such toxicity was previously ascribed to both K. pinnata extracts [19] and synthetic CecP1 [3]. Water extract of wild-type K. pinnata exhibited both microbicide and wound healing activity, although its own microbicide activity was lower than in Cefazolin. In contrast, K. pinnata + CecP1 extract exhibited the same microbicide activity against S. aureus mono infection as Cefazolin. Activity of K. pinnata + CecP1 extract against combination of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa was much better than in Cefazolin.

Noteworthily, none of the examined preparations did provide complete elimination of bacteria in the wound bed even on the 14th day of the experiment. Residual bacterial load at this period was close for all three microbicides. This effect, despite a low number of the residual alive bacteria, may contribute to rising drug resistance in pathogens and should be controlled.

Taken together, the extract of K. pinnata transgenic plants containing 0.7 μg/mL CecP1 obtained following the described method may be suggested to be promising for external use. First of all, it should be tested as a candidate drug for treatment of trophic ulceration in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interests.


This work is supported by a grant by Ministry of Education and Science of Russian Federation (Agreement no. 14.607.21.0016, Unique Identifier RFMEFI60714X0016).


  1. A. Ebbensgaard, H. Mordhorst, M. T. Overgaard, C. G. Nielsen, F. M. Aarestrup, and E. B. Hansen, “Comparative evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of different antimicrobial peptides against a range of pathogenic Bacteria,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 12, Article ID e0144611, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. Y. Zhou and Y. Peng, “Synergistic effect of clinically used antibiotics and peptide antibiotics against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria,” Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1000–1004, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. Eckert, “Road to clinical efficacy: challenges and novel strategies for antimicrobial peptide development,” Future Microbiology, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 635–651, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. K. C. De Almeida, T. B. Lima, D. O. Motta et al., “Investigating specific bacterial resistance to AMPs by using a magainin I-resistant Escherichia coli model,” The Journal of Antibiotics, vol. 67, no. 10, pp. 681–687, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. Y. Ge, D. MacDonald, M. M. Henry et al., “In vitro susceptibility to pexiganan of bacteria isolated from infected diabetic foot ulcers,” Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 45–53, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J.-Y. Lee, A. Boman, S. Chuanxin et al., “Antibacterial peptides from pig intestine: isolation of a mammalian cecropin,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 86, no. 23, pp. 9159–9162, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Andersson, A. Boman, and H. G. Boman, “Ascaris nematodes from pig and human make three antibacterial peptides: isolation of cecropin P1 and two ASABF peptides,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences: CMLS, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 599–606, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. Pillai, S. Ueno, H. Zhang, J. M. Lee, and Y. Kato, “Cecropin P1 and novel nematode cecropins: a bacteria-inducible antimicrobial peptide family in the nematode Ascaris suum,” The Biochemical Journal, vol. 390, no. 1, pp. 207–214, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. Xu, F. Zhong, Y. Zhang et al., “Construction of Bacillus subtilis strain engineered for expression of porcine β-defensin-2/cecropin P1 fusion antimicrobial peptides and its growth-promoting effect and antimicrobial activity,” Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. N. S. Zakharchenko, A. A. Lebedeva, O. V. Furs et al., “Producing marker-free Kalanchoe plants expressing antimicrobial peptide cecropin P1 gene,” Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 273–282, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Giacometti, O. Cirioni, R. Ghiselli et al., “Effect of mono-dose intraperitoneal cecropins in experimental septic shock,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 1666–1669, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. J. Moore, D. A. Devine, and M. C. Bibby, “Preliminary experimental anticancer activity of cecropins,” Peptide Research, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 265–269, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. C. Guo, Y. Huang, P. Cong, X. Liu, Y. Chen, and Z. He, “Cecropin P1 inhibits porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus by blocking attachment,” BMC Microbiology, vol. 14, article no. 273, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. T. V. Shevchuk, N. S. Zakharchenko, S. V. Tarlachkov, O. V. Furs, O. V. Dyachenko, and Y. I. Buryanov, “35S promoter methylation in kanamycin-resistant kalanchoe (Kalanchoe pinnata L.) plants expressing the antimicrobial peptide cecropin P1 transgene,” Biochemistry (Moscow), vol. 81, no. 9, pp. 968–971, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. B. S. Nayak, M. R. Marshall, and G. Isitor, “Wound healing potential of ethanolic extract of Kalanchoe pinnata (Lam.) leaf—a preliminary study,” Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 572–576, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. M. Bass, A. A. Fedorovs'kiǐ, L. V. Kobernichenko, E. F. Salivon, and V. I. Pins'kiǐ, “New drug preparation—kalanchoe juice,” Farmatsevtychnyĭ zhurnal, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 89–93, 1970. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. I. Radchenko and L. N. Danilov, “Treatment of chronic subatrophic and atrophic rhinitis,” The Journal of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngologie, no. 3, article no. 64, 1979. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. A. G. Da Silva, S. S. Costa, S. C. F. Mendonça, E. M. Silva, V. L. G. Moraes, and B. Rossi-Bergmann, “Therapeutic effect of oral Kalanchoe pinnata leaf extract in murine leishmaniasis,” Acta Tropica, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 201–210, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. U. Supratman, T. Fujita, K. Akiyama, and H. Hayashi, “New insecticidal bufadienolide, bryophyllin C, from Kalanchoe pinnata,” Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 1310–1312, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. V. P. Shirobokov, A. I. Evtushenko, V. F. Lapchik, D. N. Shirobokova, and E. A. Suptel', “Antiviral activity of representatives of the family Crassulaceae,” Antibiotiki, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 897–900, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. R. Jaeger Greer, R. G. Cates, F. B. Johnson, D. Lamnaouer, and L. Ohai, “Activity of acetone and methanol extracts from thirty-one medicinal plant species against herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2,” Pharmaceutical Biology, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 1031–1037, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. El Abdellaoui, E. Destandau, A. Toribio et al., “Bioactive molecules in Kalanchoe pinnata leaves: extraction, purification, and identification,” Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, vol. 398, no. 3, pp. 1329–1338, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. F. Muzitano, M. C. Bergonzi, G. O. De Melo et al., “Influence of cultivation conditions, season of collection and extraction method on the content of antileishmanial flavonoids from Kalanchoe pinnata,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 133, no. 1, pp. 132–137, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. I. Evtushenko, “Lectins in virology,” Voprosy Virusologii, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 132–137, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. K. Adenike and O. B. Eretan, “Purification and partial characterization of a lectin from the fresh leaves of Kalanchoe crenata (Andr.) Haw,” Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 229–233, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. R. H. V. Mourão, F. O. Santos, E. M. Franzotti, M. P. N. Moreno, and A. R. Antoniolli, “Antiinflammatory activity and acute toxicity (LD50) of the juice of Kalanchoe brasiliensis (Comb.) leaves picked before and during blooming,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 352–354, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. T. Ibrahim, J. M. T. Cunha, K. Madi, L. M. B. Da Fonseca, S. S. Costa, and V. L. Gonçalves Koatz, “Immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects of Kalanchoe brasiliensis,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 875–883, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. A. C. F. Ferreira, D. Rosenthal, and D. P. Carvalho, “Thyroid peroxidase inhibition by Kalanchoe brasiliensis aqueous extract,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 417–421, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. L. B. S. Nascimento, M. V. Leal-Costa, M. A. S. Coutinho et al., “Increased antioxidant activity and changes in phenolic profile of kalanchoe pinnata (Lamarck) persoon (crassulaceae) specimens grown under supplemental blue light,” Photochemistry and Photobiology, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 391–399, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. Zh. I. Kirilyuk, “Experimental grounds for the use of St. John's wort and Kalanchoe pinnata preparations in the treatment of infected wounds,” Vestnik Khirurgii Imeni I.I.Grekova, vol. 120, no. 4, pp. 126–130, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. T. Yamagishi, X.-Z. Yan, R.-Y. Wu, D. R. McPhail, A. T. McPhail, and K.-H. Lee, “Structure and stereochemistry of bryophyllin-A, a novel potent cytotoxic bufadienolide orthoacetate from Bryophyllum pnnatum,” Chemical & Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1615–1617, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. T. Yamagishi, M. Haruna, X.-Z. Yan, J.-J. Chang, and K.-H. Lee, “Antitumor agents, 110. Bryophyllin B, a novel potent cytotoxic bufadienolide from Bryophyllum pinnatum,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 1071–1079, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. G. Umbuzeiro-Valent, D. A. Roubicek, and E. M. A. B. Haebisch, “Mutagenic and antimutagenic evaluation of the juice of the leaves of Bryophyllum calycinum (Kalanchoe pinnata), a plant with antihistamine activity,” Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 325–327, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. S. S. Costa, A. Jossang, B. Bodo, M. L. M. Souza, and V. L. G. Moraes, “Patuletin acetylrhamnosides from Kalanchoe brasiliensis as inhibitors of human lymphocyte proliferative activity,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 1503–1510, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. L. B. Reller, W. W. Karney, H. N. Beaty, K. K. Holmes, and M. Turck, “Evaluation of cefazolin, a new cephalosporin antibiotic,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 488–497, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. A. G. Khanin, P. I. Tolstykh, L. F. Mulyaev, and A. P. Levshenko, “Healing of suppurative wounds treated with hygrolytin—a proteolytic enzyme of bacterial origin,” Sovetskaya Meditsina, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 119–124, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. N. Takzaree, A. Hadjiakhondi, G. Hassanzadeh, M. R. Rouini, and A. Manayi, “Synergistic effect of honey and propolis on cutaneous wound healing in rats,” Acta Medica Iranica, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 233–239, 2016. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. F. Campanile, D. Bongiorno, M. Perez et al., “Epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus in Italy: first nationwide survey, 2012,” Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 247–254, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. D. D. Men'shikov, M. A. Godkov, T. V. Chernen'kaia et al., “Mono- and associated microflora during wound infection in patients with burns,” Zhurnal Mikrobiologii, Epidemiologii, I Immunobiologii, no. 6, pp. 3–7, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus